Reconceptualizing resistance: sociology and the affective dimension of resistance
Identifieur interne : 002940 ( Main/Exploration ); précédent : 002939; suivant : 002941Reconceptualizing resistance: sociology and the affective dimension of resistance
Auteurs : Maria Hynes [Australie]Source :
- The British Journal of Sociology [ 0007-1315 ] ; 2013-12.
Descripteurs français
- Wicri :
English descriptors
- KwdEn :
- Active behaviour, Adkins, Affective, Affective capacities, Affective dimension, Affective dynamics, Affective event, Affective events, Affective labour, Affective power, Affective resistance, Affective transitions, Analytical autonomy, Analytical tool, Blackwell publishing, Bodily potentials, British journal, Clough, Collective action, Collective struggles, Conscious intent, Conscious perception, Contemporary power, Cultural politics, Cultural studies, Deleuze, Deleuzian approach, Deleuzian reading, Dominant modes, Duke university press, Einwohner, Emotional investment, Empiricism, European journal, Everyday forms, Everyday resistance, Hollander, Hynes, Immaterial labour, Important role, London school, Lury, Macropolitical, Macropolitical struggles, Maria hynes, Mass protests, Massumi, Micropolitics, Oppositional model, Original emphasis, Paradigm shift, Performative approach, Political action, Political leaders, Political science, Potential impact, Recent decades, Recent years, Reconceptualizing, Representational tradition, Resistance, Resistance today, Same events, Social actors, Social change, Social character, Social context, Social experience, Social movements, Social relations, Social sciences, Social theory, Sociological, Sociological analysis, Sociological empiricism, Sociological literature, Sociological study, Sociology, Sociology london school, Sociology reconceptualizing resistance, Structural categories, Subjective experience, Systemic structures, Trans, Virtual, Virtual forces, Virtual reality.
- Teeft :
- Active behaviour, Adkins, Affective, Affective capacities, Affective dimension, Affective dynamics, Affective event, Affective events, Affective labour, Affective power, Affective resistance, Affective transitions, Analytical autonomy, Analytical tool, Blackwell publishing, Bodily potentials, British journal, Clough, Collective action, Collective struggles, Conscious intent, Conscious perception, Contemporary power, Cultural politics, Cultural studies, Deleuze, Deleuzian approach, Deleuzian reading, Dominant modes, Duke university press, Einwohner, Emotional investment, Empiricism, European journal, Everyday forms, Everyday resistance, Hollander, Hynes, Immaterial labour, Important role, London school, Lury, Macropolitical, Macropolitical struggles, Maria hynes, Mass protests, Massumi, Micropolitics, Oppositional model, Original emphasis, Paradigm shift, Performative approach, Political action, Political leaders, Political science, Potential impact, Recent decades, Recent years, Reconceptualizing, Representational tradition, Resistance, Resistance today, Same events, Social actors, Social change, Social character, Social context, Social experience, Social movements, Social relations, Social sciences, Social theory, Sociological, Sociological analysis, Sociological empiricism, Sociological literature, Sociological study, Sociology, Sociology london school, Sociology reconceptualizing resistance, Structural categories, Subjective experience, Systemic structures, Trans, Virtual, Virtual forces, Virtual reality.
Abstract
This paper re‐examines the sociological study of resistance in light of growing interest in the concept of affect. Recent claims that we are witness to an ‘affective turn’ and calls for a ‘new sociological empiricism’ sensitive to affect indicate an emerging paradigm shift in sociology. Yet, mainstream sociological study of resistance tends to have been largely unaffected by this shift. To this end, this paper presents a case for the significance of affect as a lens by which to approach the study of resistance. My claim is not simply that the forms of actions we would normally recognize as resistance have an affective dimension. Rather, it is that the theory of affect broadens ‘resistance’ beyond the purview of the two dominant modes of analysis in sociology; namely, the study of macropolitical forms, on the one hand, and the micropolitics of everyday resistance on the other. This broadened perspective challenges the persistent assumption that ideological forms of power and resistance are the most pertinent to the contemporary world, suggesting that much power and resistance today is of a more affective nature. In making this argument, it is a Deleuzian reading of affect that is pursued, which opens up to a level of analysis beyond the common understanding of affect as emotion. I argue that an affective approach to resistance would pay attention to those barely perceptible transitions in power and mobilizations of bodily potential that operate below the conscious perceptions and subjective emotions of social actors. These affective transitions constitute a new site at which both power and resistance operate.
Url:
DOI: 10.1111/1468-4446.12038
Affiliations:
Links toward previous steps (curation, corpus...)
- to stream Istex, to step Corpus: 003A77
- to stream Istex, to step Curation: 003A77
- to stream Istex, to step Checkpoint: 000493
- to stream Main, to step Merge: 002952
- to stream Main, to step Curation: 002940
Le document en format XML
<record><TEI wicri:istexFullTextTei="biblStruct"><teiHeader><fileDesc><titleStmt><title xml:lang="en">Reconceptualizing resistance: sociology and the affective dimension of resistance</title><author><name sortKey="Hynes, Maria" sort="Hynes, Maria" uniqKey="Hynes M" first="Maria" last="Hynes">Maria Hynes</name></author></titleStmt><publicationStmt><idno type="wicri:source">ISTEX</idno><idno type="RBID">ISTEX:76FA99A4250083A401EF11F0CA4ECEA8116595F8</idno><date when="2013" year="2013">2013</date><idno type="doi">10.1111/1468-4446.12038</idno><idno type="url">https://api.istex.fr/document/76FA99A4250083A401EF11F0CA4ECEA8116595F8/fulltext/pdf</idno><idno type="wicri:Area/Istex/Corpus">003A77</idno><idno type="wicri:explorRef" wicri:stream="Istex" wicri:step="Corpus" wicri:corpus="ISTEX">003A77</idno><idno type="wicri:Area/Istex/Curation">003A77</idno><idno type="wicri:Area/Istex/Checkpoint">000493</idno><idno type="wicri:explorRef" wicri:stream="Istex" wicri:step="Checkpoint">000493</idno><idno type="wicri:doubleKey">0007-1315:2013:Hynes M:reconceptualizing:resistance:sociology</idno><idno type="wicri:Area/Main/Merge">002952</idno><idno type="wicri:Area/Main/Curation">002940</idno><idno type="wicri:Area/Main/Exploration">002940</idno></publicationStmt><sourceDesc><biblStruct><analytic><title level="a" type="main">Reconceptualizing resistance: sociology and the affective dimension of resistance<ref type="bibl" target="#bjos12038-note-0001"></ref></title><author><name sortKey="Hynes, Maria" sort="Hynes, Maria" uniqKey="Hynes M" first="Maria" last="Hynes">Maria Hynes</name><affiliation></affiliation><affiliation wicri:level="1"><country wicri:rule="url">Australie</country></affiliation></author></analytic><monogr></monogr><series><title level="j" type="main">The British Journal of Sociology</title><title level="j" type="alt">THE BRITISH JOURNAL OF SOCIOLOGY</title><idno type="ISSN">0007-1315</idno><idno type="eISSN">1468-4446</idno><imprint><biblScope unit="vol">64</biblScope><biblScope unit="issue">4</biblScope><biblScope unit="page" from="559">559</biblScope><biblScope unit="page" to="577">577</biblScope><biblScope unit="page-count">19</biblScope><date type="published" when="2013-12">2013-12</date></imprint><idno type="ISSN">0007-1315</idno></series></biblStruct></sourceDesc><seriesStmt><idno type="ISSN">0007-1315</idno></seriesStmt></fileDesc><profileDesc><textClass><keywords scheme="KwdEn" xml:lang="en"><term>Active behaviour</term><term>Adkins</term><term>Affective</term><term>Affective capacities</term><term>Affective dimension</term><term>Affective dynamics</term><term>Affective event</term><term>Affective events</term><term>Affective labour</term><term>Affective power</term><term>Affective resistance</term><term>Affective transitions</term><term>Analytical autonomy</term><term>Analytical tool</term><term>Blackwell publishing</term><term>Bodily potentials</term><term>British journal</term><term>Clough</term><term>Collective action</term><term>Collective struggles</term><term>Conscious intent</term><term>Conscious perception</term><term>Contemporary power</term><term>Cultural politics</term><term>Cultural studies</term><term>Deleuze</term><term>Deleuzian approach</term><term>Deleuzian reading</term><term>Dominant modes</term><term>Duke university press</term><term>Einwohner</term><term>Emotional investment</term><term>Empiricism</term><term>European journal</term><term>Everyday forms</term><term>Everyday resistance</term><term>Hollander</term><term>Hynes</term><term>Immaterial labour</term><term>Important role</term><term>London school</term><term>Lury</term><term>Macropolitical</term><term>Macropolitical struggles</term><term>Maria hynes</term><term>Mass protests</term><term>Massumi</term><term>Micropolitics</term><term>Oppositional model</term><term>Original emphasis</term><term>Paradigm shift</term><term>Performative approach</term><term>Political action</term><term>Political leaders</term><term>Political science</term><term>Potential impact</term><term>Recent decades</term><term>Recent years</term><term>Reconceptualizing</term><term>Representational tradition</term><term>Resistance</term><term>Resistance today</term><term>Same events</term><term>Social actors</term><term>Social change</term><term>Social character</term><term>Social context</term><term>Social experience</term><term>Social movements</term><term>Social relations</term><term>Social sciences</term><term>Social theory</term><term>Sociological</term><term>Sociological analysis</term><term>Sociological empiricism</term><term>Sociological literature</term><term>Sociological study</term><term>Sociology</term><term>Sociology london school</term><term>Sociology reconceptualizing resistance</term><term>Structural categories</term><term>Subjective experience</term><term>Systemic structures</term><term>Trans</term><term>Virtual</term><term>Virtual forces</term><term>Virtual reality</term></keywords><keywords scheme="Teeft" xml:lang="en"><term>Active behaviour</term><term>Adkins</term><term>Affective</term><term>Affective capacities</term><term>Affective dimension</term><term>Affective dynamics</term><term>Affective event</term><term>Affective events</term><term>Affective labour</term><term>Affective power</term><term>Affective resistance</term><term>Affective transitions</term><term>Analytical autonomy</term><term>Analytical tool</term><term>Blackwell publishing</term><term>Bodily potentials</term><term>British journal</term><term>Clough</term><term>Collective action</term><term>Collective struggles</term><term>Conscious intent</term><term>Conscious perception</term><term>Contemporary power</term><term>Cultural politics</term><term>Cultural studies</term><term>Deleuze</term><term>Deleuzian approach</term><term>Deleuzian reading</term><term>Dominant modes</term><term>Duke university press</term><term>Einwohner</term><term>Emotional investment</term><term>Empiricism</term><term>European journal</term><term>Everyday forms</term><term>Everyday resistance</term><term>Hollander</term><term>Hynes</term><term>Immaterial labour</term><term>Important role</term><term>London school</term><term>Lury</term><term>Macropolitical</term><term>Macropolitical struggles</term><term>Maria hynes</term><term>Mass protests</term><term>Massumi</term><term>Micropolitics</term><term>Oppositional model</term><term>Original emphasis</term><term>Paradigm shift</term><term>Performative approach</term><term>Political action</term><term>Political leaders</term><term>Political science</term><term>Potential impact</term><term>Recent decades</term><term>Recent years</term><term>Reconceptualizing</term><term>Representational tradition</term><term>Resistance</term><term>Resistance today</term><term>Same events</term><term>Social actors</term><term>Social change</term><term>Social character</term><term>Social context</term><term>Social experience</term><term>Social movements</term><term>Social relations</term><term>Social sciences</term><term>Social theory</term><term>Sociological</term><term>Sociological analysis</term><term>Sociological empiricism</term><term>Sociological literature</term><term>Sociological study</term><term>Sociology</term><term>Sociology london school</term><term>Sociology reconceptualizing resistance</term><term>Structural categories</term><term>Subjective experience</term><term>Systemic structures</term><term>Trans</term><term>Virtual</term><term>Virtual forces</term><term>Virtual reality</term></keywords><keywords scheme="Wicri" type="topic" xml:lang="fr"><term>Science politique</term><term>Changement social</term><term>Sciences sociales</term><term>Sociologie</term><term>Réalité virtuelle</term></keywords></textClass></profileDesc></teiHeader><front><div type="abstract">This paper re‐examines the sociological study of resistance in light of growing interest in the concept of affect. Recent claims that we are witness to an ‘affective turn’ and calls for a ‘new sociological empiricism’ sensitive to affect indicate an emerging paradigm shift in sociology. Yet, mainstream sociological study of resistance tends to have been largely unaffected by this shift. To this end, this paper presents a case for the significance of affect as a lens by which to approach the study of resistance. My claim is not simply that the forms of actions we would normally recognize as resistance have an affective dimension. Rather, it is that the theory of affect broadens ‘resistance’ beyond the purview of the two dominant modes of analysis in sociology; namely, the study of macropolitical forms, on the one hand, and the micropolitics of everyday resistance on the other. This broadened perspective challenges the persistent assumption that ideological forms of power and resistance are the most pertinent to the contemporary world, suggesting that much power and resistance today is of a more affective nature. In making this argument, it is a Deleuzian reading of affect that is pursued, which opens up to a level of analysis beyond the common understanding of affect as emotion. I argue that an affective approach to resistance would pay attention to those barely perceptible transitions in power and mobilizations of bodily potential that operate below the conscious perceptions and subjective emotions of social actors. These affective transitions constitute a new site at which both power and resistance operate.</div></front></TEI><affiliations><list><country><li>Australie</li></country></list><tree><country name="Australie"><noRegion><name sortKey="Hynes, Maria" sort="Hynes, Maria" uniqKey="Hynes M" first="Maria" last="Hynes">Maria Hynes</name></noRegion></country></tree></affiliations></record>Pour manipuler ce document sous Unix (Dilib)
EXPLOR_STEP=$WICRI_ROOT/Wicri/Santé/explor/EdenteV2/Data/Main/Exploration
HfdSelect -h $EXPLOR_STEP/biblio.hfd -nk 002940 | SxmlIndent | more
Ou
HfdSelect -h $EXPLOR_AREA/Data/Main/Exploration/biblio.hfd -nk 002940 | SxmlIndent | more
Pour mettre un lien sur cette page dans le réseau Wicri
{{Explor lien
|wiki= Wicri/Santé
|area= EdenteV2
|flux= Main
|étape= Exploration
|type= RBID
|clé= ISTEX:76FA99A4250083A401EF11F0CA4ECEA8116595F8
|texte= Reconceptualizing resistance: sociology and the affective dimension of resistance
}}
| This area was generated with Dilib version V0.6.32. |  |