EdenteV2, Main, Exploration, bibRecord, 002842

The publication of Australian Press Council Adjudication 1468: a failure to meet ‘due prominence’ requirements

Identifieur interne : 002842 ( Main/Exploration ); précédent : 002841; suivant : 002843

The publication of Australian Press Council Adjudication 1468: a failure to meet ‘due prominence’ requirements

Auteurs : Robert John Donovan [Australie] ; Edward Wilkes [Australie] ; Lynda Fielder [Australie] ; Geoffrey Jalleh [Australie]

Source :

Journal of Public Affairs [ 1472-3891 ] ; 2013-02.

RBID : ISTEX:F39F66BAA8E3A805850E0459180712351B6F5B8F

Descripteurs français

Wicri :
- topic : Droit d'auteur.

English descriptors

Abstract

The Australian Press Council, the print media self‐regulation body in Australia that receives and adjudicates complaints by the public, states that upheld adjudications are to be published with ‘due prominence’. The Council defines ‘due prominence’ as publishing the adjudication such that it is ‘likely to be read by those who saw the offending material’. In 2010 the Council upheld a complaint about misleading material that occurred on the front page of a newspaper. The complaint included that the misleading front page material triggered a large number of insulting letters about the person in that story which the newspaper published the following day. The newspaper published the upheld adjudication (no. 1468) on the letters page even though the primary offending material occurred on the front page. Rather than seek re‐publication in a more prominent location, the Australian Press Council accepted the newspaper's placement as satisfying their ‘due prominence’ requirement. Given the apparent inconsistency between publication of the adjudication on the letters page and the ‘likely to be read by’ definition of due prominence, we provided 100 adult newspaper readers with brief details of the upheld complaint and the definition of due prominence and asked where in the paper the adjudication should be published. Contrary to the Council's acceptance of the location of the newspaper's publication of the adjudication, the vast majority of newspaper readers (88%) responded with the front page (62%) or the first three pages (26%). This discrepancy is discussed in the context of the efficacy of self‐regulation and the ethical standards of bodies charged with ethical governance. Copyright © 2012 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.

Url:

https://api.istex.fr/document/F39F66BAA8E3A805850E0459180712351B6F5B8F/fulltext/pdf

DOI: 10.1002/pa.1424

Affiliations:

Australie

Links toward previous steps (curation, corpus...)

to stream Istex, to step Corpus: 007876
to stream Istex, to step Curation: 007876
to stream Istex, to step Checkpoint: 000395
to stream Main, to step Merge: 002854
to stream Main, to step Curation: 002842

Le document en format XML

<record><TEI wicri:istexFullTextTei="biblStruct"><teiHeader><fileDesc><titleStmt><title xml:lang="en">The publication of Australian Press Council Adjudication 1468: a failure to meet ‘due prominence’ requirements</title>
<author><name sortKey="Donovan, Robert John" sort="Donovan, Robert John" uniqKey="Donovan R" first="Robert John" last="Donovan">Robert John Donovan</name>
</author>
<author><name sortKey="Wilkes, Edward" sort="Wilkes, Edward" uniqKey="Wilkes E" first="Edward" last="Wilkes">Edward Wilkes</name>
</author>
<author><name sortKey="Fielder, Lynda" sort="Fielder, Lynda" uniqKey="Fielder L" first="Lynda" last="Fielder">Lynda Fielder</name>
</author>
<author><name sortKey="Jalleh, Geoffrey" sort="Jalleh, Geoffrey" uniqKey="Jalleh G" first="Geoffrey" last="Jalleh">Geoffrey Jalleh</name>
</author>
</titleStmt>
<publicationStmt><idno type="wicri:source">ISTEX</idno>
<idno type="RBID">ISTEX:F39F66BAA8E3A805850E0459180712351B6F5B8F</idno>
<date when="2013" year="2013">2013</date>
<idno type="doi">10.1002/pa.1424</idno>
<idno type="url">https://api.istex.fr/document/F39F66BAA8E3A805850E0459180712351B6F5B8F/fulltext/pdf</idno>
<idno type="wicri:Area/Istex/Corpus">007876</idno>
<idno type="wicri:explorRef" wicri:stream="Istex" wicri:step="Corpus" wicri:corpus="ISTEX">007876</idno>
<idno type="wicri:Area/Istex/Curation">007876</idno>
<idno type="wicri:Area/Istex/Checkpoint">000395</idno>
<idno type="wicri:explorRef" wicri:stream="Istex" wicri:step="Checkpoint">000395</idno>
<idno type="wicri:doubleKey">1472-3891:2013:Donovan R:the:publication:of</idno>
<idno type="wicri:Area/Main/Merge">002854</idno>
<idno type="wicri:Area/Main/Curation">002842</idno>
<idno type="wicri:Area/Main/Exploration">002842</idno>
</publicationStmt>
<sourceDesc><biblStruct><analytic><title level="a" type="main">The publication of Australian Press Council Adjudication 1468: a failure to meet ‘due prominence’ requirements</title>
<author><name sortKey="Donovan, Robert John" sort="Donovan, Robert John" uniqKey="Donovan R" first="Robert John" last="Donovan">Robert John Donovan</name>
<affiliation wicri:level="1"><country xml:lang="fr">Australie</country>
<wicri:regionArea>Centre for Behavioural Research in Cancer Control, Curtin University, WA, Perth</wicri:regionArea>
<wicri:noRegion>Perth</wicri:noRegion>
</affiliation>
<affiliation></affiliation>
<affiliation wicri:level="1"><country wicri:rule="url">Australie</country>
</affiliation>
</author>
<author><name sortKey="Wilkes, Edward" sort="Wilkes, Edward" uniqKey="Wilkes E" first="Edward" last="Wilkes">Edward Wilkes</name>
<affiliation wicri:level="1"><country xml:lang="fr">Australie</country>
<wicri:regionArea>National Drug Research Institute (NDRI), Curtin University, WA, Perth</wicri:regionArea>
<wicri:noRegion>Perth</wicri:noRegion>
</affiliation>
</author>
<author><name sortKey="Fielder, Lynda" sort="Fielder, Lynda" uniqKey="Fielder L" first="Lynda" last="Fielder">Lynda Fielder</name>
<affiliation wicri:level="1"><country xml:lang="fr">Australie</country>
<wicri:regionArea>Social Marketing Research Unit, Curtin University, WA, Perth</wicri:regionArea>
<wicri:noRegion>Perth</wicri:noRegion>
</affiliation>
</author>
<author><name sortKey="Jalleh, Geoffrey" sort="Jalleh, Geoffrey" uniqKey="Jalleh G" first="Geoffrey" last="Jalleh">Geoffrey Jalleh</name>
<affiliation wicri:level="1"><country xml:lang="fr">Australie</country>
<wicri:regionArea>Centre for Behavioural Research in Cancer Control, Curtin University, WA, Perth</wicri:regionArea>
<wicri:noRegion>Perth</wicri:noRegion>
</affiliation>
</author>
</analytic>
<monogr></monogr>
<series><title level="j" type="main">Journal of Public Affairs</title>
<title level="j" type="alt">JOURNAL OF PUBLIC AFFAIRS</title>
<idno type="ISSN">1472-3891</idno>
<idno type="eISSN">1479-1854</idno>
<imprint><biblScope unit="vol">13</biblScope>
<biblScope unit="issue">1</biblScope>
<biblScope unit="page" from="23">23</biblScope>
<biblScope unit="page" to="32">32</biblScope>
<biblScope unit="page-count">10</biblScope>
<date type="published" when="2013-02">2013-02</date>
</imprint>
<idno type="ISSN">1472-3891</idno>
</series>
</biblStruct>
</sourceDesc>
<seriesStmt><idno type="ISSN">1472-3891</idno>
</seriesStmt>
</fileDesc>
<profileDesc><textClass><keywords scheme="KwdEn" xml:lang="en"><term>Adjudication</term>
<term>Adult newspaper readers</term>
<term>Apology</term>
<term>Australian</term>
<term>Australian press</term>
<term>Australian press council</term>
<term>Australian press council adjudication</term>
<term>Banda</term>
<term>Behavioural research</term>
<term>Business section</term>
<term>Cancer control</term>
<term>Caption</term>
<term>Code breaches</term>
<term>Common sense</term>
<term>Complainant</term>
<term>Complaint</term>
<term>Complaints commission</term>
<term>Copyright</term>
<term>Corrections column</term>
<term>Council members</term>
<term>Curtin university</term>
<term>Editor page</term>
<term>Editorial pages</term>
<term>Equal proportions</term>
<term>Food marketing</term>
<term>Front page</term>
<term>Front page picture</term>
<term>Front page picture caption</term>
<term>Full knowledge</term>
<term>General conditions</term>
<term>Government regulation</term>
<term>Headline</term>
<term>Independent members</term>
<term>Independent reviews</term>
<term>Industry members</term>
<term>Insulting letters</term>
<term>John banda</term>
<term>John wiley sons</term>
<term>Large number</term>
<term>Letters page</term>
<term>Letters pages</term>
<term>Lthy kitchen</term>
<term>Many respondents</term>
<term>Mass media ethics</term>
<term>Media accountability</term>
<term>Misleading picture caption</term>
<term>Motor vehicle advertising</term>
<term>Neutralising</term>
<term>Newspaper headlines</term>
<term>Newspaper readers</term>
<term>Original article</term>
<term>Original publication</term>
<term>Other hand</term>
<term>Picture caption</term>
<term>Potential complainants</term>
<term>Press complaints commission</term>
<term>Press council</term>
<term>Press councils</term>
<term>Print media</term>
<term>Prominence</term>
<term>Prominence requirement</term>
<term>Prominence requirements</term>
<term>Public affairs</term>
<term>Public members</term>
<term>Public prosecutions</term>
<term>Readership</term>
<term>Same page</term>
<term>Same section</term>
<term>Scenario</term>
<term>Scenario page</term>
<term>Section readership</term>
<term>Serious inaccuracy</term>
<term>Such conditions</term>
<term>Toothless tiger</term>
<term>Valuable contribution</term>
<term>Vast majority</term>
<term>West australian</term>
<term>Zealand press council</term>
</keywords>
<keywords scheme="Teeft" xml:lang="en"><term>Adjudication</term>
<term>Adult newspaper readers</term>
<term>Apology</term>
<term>Australian</term>
<term>Australian press</term>
<term>Australian press council</term>
<term>Australian press council adjudication</term>
<term>Banda</term>
<term>Behavioural research</term>
<term>Business section</term>
<term>Cancer control</term>
<term>Caption</term>
<term>Code breaches</term>
<term>Common sense</term>
<term>Complainant</term>
<term>Complaint</term>
<term>Complaints commission</term>
<term>Copyright</term>
<term>Corrections column</term>
<term>Council members</term>
<term>Curtin university</term>
<term>Editor page</term>
<term>Editorial pages</term>
<term>Equal proportions</term>
<term>Food marketing</term>
<term>Front page</term>
<term>Front page picture</term>
<term>Front page picture caption</term>
<term>Full knowledge</term>
<term>General conditions</term>
<term>Government regulation</term>
<term>Headline</term>
<term>Independent members</term>
<term>Independent reviews</term>
<term>Industry members</term>
<term>Insulting letters</term>
<term>John banda</term>
<term>John wiley sons</term>
<term>Large number</term>
<term>Letters page</term>
<term>Letters pages</term>
<term>Lthy kitchen</term>
<term>Many respondents</term>
<term>Mass media ethics</term>
<term>Media accountability</term>
<term>Misleading picture caption</term>
<term>Motor vehicle advertising</term>
<term>Neutralising</term>
<term>Newspaper headlines</term>
<term>Newspaper readers</term>
<term>Original article</term>
<term>Original publication</term>
<term>Other hand</term>
<term>Picture caption</term>
<term>Potential complainants</term>
<term>Press complaints commission</term>
<term>Press council</term>
<term>Press councils</term>
<term>Print media</term>
<term>Prominence</term>
<term>Prominence requirement</term>
<term>Prominence requirements</term>
<term>Public affairs</term>
<term>Public members</term>
<term>Public prosecutions</term>
<term>Readership</term>
<term>Same page</term>
<term>Same section</term>
<term>Scenario</term>
<term>Scenario page</term>
<term>Section readership</term>
<term>Serious inaccuracy</term>
<term>Such conditions</term>
<term>Toothless tiger</term>
<term>Valuable contribution</term>
<term>Vast majority</term>
<term>West australian</term>
<term>Zealand press council</term>
</keywords>
<keywords scheme="Wicri" type="topic" xml:lang="fr"><term>Droit d'auteur</term>
</keywords>
</textClass>
</profileDesc>
</teiHeader>
<front><div type="abstract">The Australian Press Council, the print media self‐regulation body in Australia that receives and adjudicates complaints by the public, states that upheld adjudications are to be published with ‘due prominence’. The Council defines ‘due prominence’ as publishing the adjudication such that it is ‘likely to be read by those who saw the offending material’. In 2010 the Council upheld a complaint about misleading material that occurred on the front page of a newspaper. The complaint included that the misleading front page material triggered a large number of insulting letters about the person in that story which the newspaper published the following day. The newspaper published the upheld adjudication (no. 1468) on the letters page even though the primary offending material occurred on the front page. Rather than seek re‐publication in a more prominent location, the Australian Press Council accepted the newspaper's placement as satisfying their ‘due prominence’ requirement. Given the apparent inconsistency between publication of the adjudication on the letters page and the ‘likely to be read by’ definition of due prominence, we provided 100 adult newspaper readers with brief details of the upheld complaint and the definition of due prominence and asked where in the paper the adjudication should be published. Contrary to the Council's acceptance of the location of the newspaper's publication of the adjudication, the vast majority of newspaper readers (88%) responded with the front page (62%) or the first three pages (26%). This discrepancy is discussed in the context of the efficacy of self‐regulation and the ethical standards of bodies charged with ethical governance. Copyright © 2012 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.</div>
</front>
</TEI>
<affiliations><list><country><li>Australie</li>
</country>
</list>
<tree><country name="Australie"><noRegion><name sortKey="Donovan, Robert John" sort="Donovan, Robert John" uniqKey="Donovan R" first="Robert John" last="Donovan">Robert John Donovan</name>
</noRegion>
<name sortKey="Donovan, Robert John" sort="Donovan, Robert John" uniqKey="Donovan R" first="Robert John" last="Donovan">Robert John Donovan</name>
<name sortKey="Fielder, Lynda" sort="Fielder, Lynda" uniqKey="Fielder L" first="Lynda" last="Fielder">Lynda Fielder</name>
<name sortKey="Jalleh, Geoffrey" sort="Jalleh, Geoffrey" uniqKey="Jalleh G" first="Geoffrey" last="Jalleh">Geoffrey Jalleh</name>
<name sortKey="Wilkes, Edward" sort="Wilkes, Edward" uniqKey="Wilkes E" first="Edward" last="Wilkes">Edward Wilkes</name>
</country>
</tree>
</affiliations>
</record>

Pour manipuler ce document sous Unix (Dilib)

EXPLOR_STEP=$WICRI_ROOT/Wicri/Santé/explor/EdenteV2/Data/Main/Exploration

HfdSelect -h $EXPLOR_STEP/biblio.hfd -nk 002842 | SxmlIndent | more

HfdSelect -h $EXPLOR_AREA/Data/Main/Exploration/biblio.hfd -nk 002842 | SxmlIndent | more

Pour mettre un lien sur cette page dans le réseau Wicri

{{Explor lien
   |wiki=    Wicri/Santé
   |area=    EdenteV2
   |flux=    Main
   |étape=   Exploration
   |type=    RBID
   |clé=     ISTEX:F39F66BAA8E3A805850E0459180712351B6F5B8F
   |texte=   The publication of Australian Press Council Adjudication 1468: a failure to meet ‘due prominence’ requirements
}}

This area was generated with Dilib version V0.6.32.
Data generation: Thu Nov 30 15:26:48 2017. Site generation: Tue Mar 8 16:36:20 2022

	Serveur d'exploration sur le patient édenté
	Attention, ce site est en cours de développement ! Attention, site généré par des moyens informatiques à partir de corpus bruts. Les informations ne sont donc pas validées.

Serveur d'exploration sur le patient édenté

The publication of Australian Press Council Adjudication 1468: a failure to meet ‘due prominence’ requirements

The publication of Australian Press Council Adjudication 1468: a failure to meet ‘due prominence’ requirements

Source :

Descripteurs français

English descriptors

Abstract

Links toward previous steps (curation, corpus...)

Le document en format XML

Pour manipuler ce document sous Unix (Dilib)

Pour mettre un lien sur cette page dans le réseau Wicri