Serveur d'exploration sur le patient édenté

Attention, ce site est en cours de développement !
Attention, site généré par des moyens informatiques à partir de corpus bruts.
Les informations ne sont donc pas validées.

Assessing fit at the implant-abutment junction with a radiographic device that does not require access to the implant body

Identifieur interne : 001C81 ( Main/Exploration ); précédent : 001C80; suivant : 001C82

Assessing fit at the implant-abutment junction with a radiographic device that does not require access to the implant body

Auteurs : Kevin C. Lin ; Chandur P. K. Wadhwani ; Jing Cheng ; Arun Sharma ; Frederick Finzen

Source :

RBID : PMC:5567837

Abstract

Statement of problem

Radiograph paralleling devices provide an excellent means of obtaining orthogonal radiographs for the evaluation of the fit of implant restorations. Unfortunately, the clinical applicability of such devices is a significant issue because access to the implant body must be obtained at each radiographic appointment.

Purpose

The purpose of the study was to investigate whether the fit or microgap at the implant-abutment junction could be more accurately and confidently assessed with a novel radiograph paralleling device that did not require access to the implant body once a proper registration index was made.

Material and methods

Microgaps of 0, 50, and 100 μm were introduced at the implant-abutment junction of a provisional implant crown in a manikin-typodont assembly. Dental assistants made 54 radiographs (18 per microgap) of the crown with and without a radiograph paralleling device; 9 clinicians then evaluated the standardized radiographs for the presence of misfit. The Cochran-Mantel-Haenszel test and the corresponding odds ratios were used to evaluate the effectiveness of the paralleling device in helping clinicians better assess misfit from the radiographs made.

Results

The use of the device led to a higher percentage of accuracy under all conditions (79.0% vs 70.4% at the 0-μm gap, 77.8% vs 16.1% at the 50-μm gap, and 100% vs 92.6% at the 100-μm gap); the improvement was statistically significant at the 50-μm gap (P<.001) and 100-μm gap (P=.049) but not at the 0-μm gap (P=.364). The odds ratio (95% confidence interval) of obtaining correct versus wrong answers with the device compared with without the device was 18.64 (7.94–43.77) at the 50-μm gap and 5.40 (0.25–114.25) at the 100-μm gap.

Conclusions

The study indicated that the paralleling device helped the clinician more accurately assess the implant-abutment junction with the 50- and 100-μm gaps.


Url:
DOI: 10.1016/j.prosdent.2014.03.016
PubMed: 24836280
PubMed Central: 5567837


Affiliations:


Links toward previous steps (curation, corpus...)


Le document en format XML

<record>
<TEI>
<teiHeader>
<fileDesc>
<titleStmt>
<title xml:lang="en">Assessing fit at the implant-abutment junction with a radiographic device that does not require access to the implant body</title>
<author>
<name sortKey="Lin, Kevin C" sort="Lin, Kevin C" uniqKey="Lin K" first="Kevin C." last="Lin">Kevin C. Lin</name>
</author>
<author>
<name sortKey="Wadhwani, Chandur P K" sort="Wadhwani, Chandur P K" uniqKey="Wadhwani C" first="Chandur P. K." last="Wadhwani">Chandur P. K. Wadhwani</name>
</author>
<author>
<name sortKey="Cheng, Jing" sort="Cheng, Jing" uniqKey="Cheng J" first="Jing" last="Cheng">Jing Cheng</name>
</author>
<author>
<name sortKey="Sharma, Arun" sort="Sharma, Arun" uniqKey="Sharma A" first="Arun" last="Sharma">Arun Sharma</name>
</author>
<author>
<name sortKey="Finzen, Frederick" sort="Finzen, Frederick" uniqKey="Finzen F" first="Frederick" last="Finzen">Frederick Finzen</name>
</author>
</titleStmt>
<publicationStmt>
<idno type="wicri:source">PMC</idno>
<idno type="pmid">24836280</idno>
<idno type="pmc">5567837</idno>
<idno type="url">http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5567837</idno>
<idno type="RBID">PMC:5567837</idno>
<idno type="doi">10.1016/j.prosdent.2014.03.016</idno>
<date when="2014">2014</date>
<idno type="wicri:Area/Pmc/Corpus">002602</idno>
<idno type="wicri:explorRef" wicri:stream="Pmc" wicri:step="Corpus" wicri:corpus="PMC">002602</idno>
<idno type="wicri:Area/Pmc/Curation">002602</idno>
<idno type="wicri:explorRef" wicri:stream="Pmc" wicri:step="Curation">002602</idno>
<idno type="wicri:Area/Pmc/Checkpoint">001612</idno>
<idno type="wicri:explorRef" wicri:stream="Pmc" wicri:step="Checkpoint">001612</idno>
<idno type="wicri:Area/Ncbi/Merge">005088</idno>
<idno type="wicri:Area/Ncbi/Curation">005088</idno>
<idno type="wicri:Area/Ncbi/Checkpoint">005088</idno>
<idno type="wicri:doubleKey">0022-3913:2014:Lin K:assessing:fit:at</idno>
<idno type="wicri:Area/Main/Merge">001C88</idno>
<idno type="wicri:Area/Main/Curation">001C81</idno>
<idno type="wicri:Area/Main/Exploration">001C81</idno>
</publicationStmt>
<sourceDesc>
<biblStruct>
<analytic>
<title xml:lang="en" level="a" type="main">Assessing fit at the implant-abutment junction with a radiographic device that does not require access to the implant body</title>
<author>
<name sortKey="Lin, Kevin C" sort="Lin, Kevin C" uniqKey="Lin K" first="Kevin C." last="Lin">Kevin C. Lin</name>
</author>
<author>
<name sortKey="Wadhwani, Chandur P K" sort="Wadhwani, Chandur P K" uniqKey="Wadhwani C" first="Chandur P. K." last="Wadhwani">Chandur P. K. Wadhwani</name>
</author>
<author>
<name sortKey="Cheng, Jing" sort="Cheng, Jing" uniqKey="Cheng J" first="Jing" last="Cheng">Jing Cheng</name>
</author>
<author>
<name sortKey="Sharma, Arun" sort="Sharma, Arun" uniqKey="Sharma A" first="Arun" last="Sharma">Arun Sharma</name>
</author>
<author>
<name sortKey="Finzen, Frederick" sort="Finzen, Frederick" uniqKey="Finzen F" first="Frederick" last="Finzen">Frederick Finzen</name>
</author>
</analytic>
<series>
<title level="j">The Journal of prosthetic dentistry</title>
<idno type="ISSN">0022-3913</idno>
<idno type="eISSN">1097-6841</idno>
<imprint>
<date when="2014">2014</date>
</imprint>
</series>
</biblStruct>
</sourceDesc>
</fileDesc>
<profileDesc>
<textClass></textClass>
</profileDesc>
</teiHeader>
<front>
<div type="abstract" xml:lang="en">
<sec id="S1">
<title>Statement of problem</title>
<p id="P1">Radiograph paralleling devices provide an excellent means of obtaining orthogonal radiographs for the evaluation of the fit of implant restorations. Unfortunately, the clinical applicability of such devices is a significant issue because access to the implant body must be obtained at each radiographic appointment.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="S2">
<title>Purpose</title>
<p id="P2">The purpose of the study was to investigate whether the fit or microgap at the implant-abutment junction could be more accurately and confidently assessed with a novel radiograph paralleling device that did not require access to the implant body once a proper registration index was made.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="S3">
<title>Material and methods</title>
<p id="P3">Microgaps of 0, 50, and 100 μm were introduced at the implant-abutment junction of a provisional implant crown in a manikin-typodont assembly. Dental assistants made 54 radiographs (18 per microgap) of the crown with and without a radiograph paralleling device; 9 clinicians then evaluated the standardized radiographs for the presence of misfit. The Cochran-Mantel-Haenszel test and the corresponding odds ratios were used to evaluate the effectiveness of the paralleling device in helping clinicians better assess misfit from the radiographs made.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="S4">
<title>Results</title>
<p id="P4">The use of the device led to a higher percentage of accuracy under all conditions (79.0% vs 70.4% at the 0-μm gap, 77.8% vs 16.1% at the 50-μm gap, and 100% vs 92.6% at the 100-μm gap); the improvement was statistically significant at the 50-μm gap (
<italic>P</italic>
<.001) and 100-μm gap (
<italic>P</italic>
=.049) but not at the 0-μm gap (
<italic>P</italic>
=.364). The odds ratio (95% confidence interval) of obtaining correct versus wrong answers with the device compared with without the device was 18.64 (7.94–43.77) at the 50-μm gap and 5.40 (0.25–114.25) at the 100-μm gap.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="S5">
<title>Conclusions</title>
<p id="P5">The study indicated that the paralleling device helped the clinician more accurately assess the implant-abutment junction with the 50- and 100-μm gaps.</p>
</sec>
</div>
</front>
</TEI>
<affiliations>
<list></list>
<tree>
<noCountry>
<name sortKey="Cheng, Jing" sort="Cheng, Jing" uniqKey="Cheng J" first="Jing" last="Cheng">Jing Cheng</name>
<name sortKey="Finzen, Frederick" sort="Finzen, Frederick" uniqKey="Finzen F" first="Frederick" last="Finzen">Frederick Finzen</name>
<name sortKey="Lin, Kevin C" sort="Lin, Kevin C" uniqKey="Lin K" first="Kevin C." last="Lin">Kevin C. Lin</name>
<name sortKey="Sharma, Arun" sort="Sharma, Arun" uniqKey="Sharma A" first="Arun" last="Sharma">Arun Sharma</name>
<name sortKey="Wadhwani, Chandur P K" sort="Wadhwani, Chandur P K" uniqKey="Wadhwani C" first="Chandur P. K." last="Wadhwani">Chandur P. K. Wadhwani</name>
</noCountry>
</tree>
</affiliations>
</record>

Pour manipuler ce document sous Unix (Dilib)

EXPLOR_STEP=$WICRI_ROOT/Wicri/Santé/explor/EdenteV2/Data/Main/Exploration
HfdSelect -h $EXPLOR_STEP/biblio.hfd -nk 001C81 | SxmlIndent | more

Ou

HfdSelect -h $EXPLOR_AREA/Data/Main/Exploration/biblio.hfd -nk 001C81 | SxmlIndent | more

Pour mettre un lien sur cette page dans le réseau Wicri

{{Explor lien
   |wiki=    Wicri/Santé
   |area=    EdenteV2
   |flux=    Main
   |étape=   Exploration
   |type=    RBID
   |clé=     PMC:5567837
   |texte=   Assessing fit at the implant-abutment junction with a radiographic device that does not require access to the implant body
}}

Pour générer des pages wiki

HfdIndexSelect -h $EXPLOR_AREA/Data/Main/Exploration/RBID.i   -Sk "pubmed:24836280" \
       | HfdSelect -Kh $EXPLOR_AREA/Data/Main/Exploration/biblio.hfd   \
       | NlmPubMed2Wicri -a EdenteV2 

Wicri

This area was generated with Dilib version V0.6.32.
Data generation: Thu Nov 30 15:26:48 2017. Site generation: Tue Mar 8 16:36:20 2022