Section 28: law, myth and paradox
Identifieur interne : 00BC82 ( Main/Curation ); précédent : 00BC81; suivant : 00BC83Section 28: law, myth and paradox
Auteurs : David T. Evans [Royaume-Uni]Source :
- CSP. Critical social policy [ 0261-0183 ] ; 1989-12.
Descripteurs français
- Wicri :
English descriptors
- KwdEn :
- Apparent endeavour, Basic problem, Bureaucratised intelligentsia, Clause, Conservative party conference, Council housing, Family life, Family relationship, First anniversary, Full sense, Glamorise homosexuality, Heterosexual, Heterosexual community, Homosexual, Homosexual behaviour, Homosexuality, Howard league, Ibid, Individual consent, January, John marshall, July, June, Labour campaign, Labour councils, Legal judgements, Lesbian, Lesbian clubs, Local authorities, Local authority, Local education authorities, Local education committees, Local government, Local government bill, London effect, London lesbian, Longford report, Lord gifford, Male homosexuality, Marriage amendment, Moral community, Moral panic, Norrie, Objective discussion, Other ways, Pink paper, Positive images, Private enterprise, Public money, Public morality, Real concern, Salisbury review, Same basis, Scruton, Sexual behaviour, Sexual offences, Specific reference, Spectator editorial, Sunday times, Thatcher, Whilst, Whilst homosexuality, Wide range, Young people.
- Teeft :
- Apparent endeavour, Basic problem, Bureaucratised intelligentsia, Clause, Conservative party conference, Council housing, Family life, Family relationship, First anniversary, Full sense, Glamorise homosexuality, Heterosexual, Heterosexual community, Homosexual, Homosexual behaviour, Homosexuality, Howard league, Ibid, Individual consent, January, John marshall, July, June, Labour campaign, Labour councils, Legal judgements, Lesbian, Lesbian clubs, Local authorities, Local authority, Local education authorities, Local education committees, Local government, Local government bill, London effect, London lesbian, Longford report, Lord gifford, Male homosexuality, Marriage amendment, Moral community, Moral panic, Norrie, Objective discussion, Other ways, Pink paper, Positive images, Private enterprise, Public money, Public morality, Real concern, Salisbury review, Same basis, Scruton, Sexual behaviour, Sexual offences, Specific reference, Spectator editorial, Sunday times, Thatcher, Whilst, Whilst homosexuality, Wide range, Young people.
Abstract
Section 28 of the Local Government Act 1988, which states that local authorities may not 'intentionally promote homosexuality' , enjoyed a rela tively quiet first anniversary at the end of May this year which was in marked contrast to the intense political debate and heightened media inter est which attended its birth. This article seeks to explain why, through an examination of Section 28 as law, by an assessment of its ideological locus within neo-conservatism, and by an evaluation of its somewhat ambiguous effects on gay politics and representations of homosexuality.
Url:
DOI: 10.1177/026101838900902705
Links toward previous steps (curation, corpus...)
- to stream Istex, to step Corpus: Pour aller vers cette notice dans l'étape Curation :004D09
- to stream Istex, to step Curation: Pour aller vers cette notice dans l'étape Curation :004D09
- to stream Istex, to step Checkpoint: Pour aller vers cette notice dans l'étape Curation :005856
- to stream Main, to step Merge: Pour aller vers cette notice dans l'étape Curation :00C434
Links to Exploration step
ISTEX:9A3A5319CDECE17E69178ADFB509C216BD60830BLe document en format XML
<record><TEI wicri:istexFullTextTei="biblStruct"><teiHeader><fileDesc><titleStmt><title xml:lang="en">Section 28: law, myth and paradox</title>
<author wicri:is="90%"><name sortKey="Evans, David T" sort="Evans, David T" uniqKey="Evans D" first="David T." last="Evans">David T. Evans</name>
</author>
</titleStmt>
<publicationStmt><idno type="wicri:source">ISTEX</idno>
<idno type="RBID">ISTEX:9A3A5319CDECE17E69178ADFB509C216BD60830B</idno>
<date when="1989" year="1989">1989</date>
<idno type="doi">10.1177/026101838900902705</idno>
<idno type="url">https://api.istex.fr/document/9A3A5319CDECE17E69178ADFB509C216BD60830B/fulltext/pdf</idno>
<idno type="wicri:Area/Istex/Corpus">004D09</idno>
<idno type="wicri:explorRef" wicri:stream="Istex" wicri:step="Corpus" wicri:corpus="ISTEX">004D09</idno>
<idno type="wicri:Area/Istex/Curation">004D09</idno>
<idno type="wicri:Area/Istex/Checkpoint">005856</idno>
<idno type="wicri:explorRef" wicri:stream="Istex" wicri:step="Checkpoint">005856</idno>
<idno type="wicri:doubleKey">0261-0183:1989:Evans D:section:law:myth</idno>
<idno type="wicri:Area/Main/Merge">00C434</idno>
<idno type="wicri:Area/Main/Curation">00BC82</idno>
</publicationStmt>
<sourceDesc><biblStruct><analytic><title level="a" type="main" xml:lang="en">Section 28: law, myth and paradox</title>
<author wicri:is="90%"><name sortKey="Evans, David T" sort="Evans, David T" uniqKey="Evans D" first="David T." last="Evans">David T. Evans</name>
<affiliation wicri:level="4"><country>Royaume-Uni</country>
<placeName><settlement type="city">Glasgow</settlement>
<region type="country">Écosse</region>
</placeName>
<orgName type="university">Université de Glasgow</orgName>
</affiliation>
</author>
</analytic>
<monogr></monogr>
<series><title level="j">CSP. Critical social policy</title>
<idno type="ISSN">0261-0183</idno>
<idno type="eISSN">1461-703X</idno>
<imprint><publisher>Sage Publications</publisher>
<pubPlace>Sage CA: Thousand Oaks, CA</pubPlace>
<date type="published" when="1989-12">1989-12</date>
<biblScope unit="volume">9</biblScope>
<biblScope unit="issue">27</biblScope>
<biblScope unit="page" from="73">73</biblScope>
<biblScope unit="page" to="95">95</biblScope>
</imprint>
<idno type="ISSN">0261-0183</idno>
</series>
</biblStruct>
</sourceDesc>
<seriesStmt><idno type="ISSN">0261-0183</idno>
</seriesStmt>
</fileDesc>
<profileDesc><textClass><keywords scheme="KwdEn" xml:lang="en"><term>Apparent endeavour</term>
<term>Basic problem</term>
<term>Bureaucratised intelligentsia</term>
<term>Clause</term>
<term>Conservative party conference</term>
<term>Council housing</term>
<term>Family life</term>
<term>Family relationship</term>
<term>First anniversary</term>
<term>Full sense</term>
<term>Glamorise homosexuality</term>
<term>Heterosexual</term>
<term>Heterosexual community</term>
<term>Homosexual</term>
<term>Homosexual behaviour</term>
<term>Homosexuality</term>
<term>Howard league</term>
<term>Ibid</term>
<term>Individual consent</term>
<term>January</term>
<term>John marshall</term>
<term>July</term>
<term>June</term>
<term>Labour campaign</term>
<term>Labour councils</term>
<term>Legal judgements</term>
<term>Lesbian</term>
<term>Lesbian clubs</term>
<term>Local authorities</term>
<term>Local authority</term>
<term>Local education authorities</term>
<term>Local education committees</term>
<term>Local government</term>
<term>Local government bill</term>
<term>London effect</term>
<term>London lesbian</term>
<term>Longford report</term>
<term>Lord gifford</term>
<term>Male homosexuality</term>
<term>Marriage amendment</term>
<term>Moral community</term>
<term>Moral panic</term>
<term>Norrie</term>
<term>Objective discussion</term>
<term>Other ways</term>
<term>Pink paper</term>
<term>Positive images</term>
<term>Private enterprise</term>
<term>Public money</term>
<term>Public morality</term>
<term>Real concern</term>
<term>Salisbury review</term>
<term>Same basis</term>
<term>Scruton</term>
<term>Sexual behaviour</term>
<term>Sexual offences</term>
<term>Specific reference</term>
<term>Spectator editorial</term>
<term>Sunday times</term>
<term>Thatcher</term>
<term>Whilst</term>
<term>Whilst homosexuality</term>
<term>Wide range</term>
<term>Young people</term>
</keywords>
<keywords scheme="Teeft" xml:lang="en"><term>Apparent endeavour</term>
<term>Basic problem</term>
<term>Bureaucratised intelligentsia</term>
<term>Clause</term>
<term>Conservative party conference</term>
<term>Council housing</term>
<term>Family life</term>
<term>Family relationship</term>
<term>First anniversary</term>
<term>Full sense</term>
<term>Glamorise homosexuality</term>
<term>Heterosexual</term>
<term>Heterosexual community</term>
<term>Homosexual</term>
<term>Homosexual behaviour</term>
<term>Homosexuality</term>
<term>Howard league</term>
<term>Ibid</term>
<term>Individual consent</term>
<term>January</term>
<term>John marshall</term>
<term>July</term>
<term>June</term>
<term>Labour campaign</term>
<term>Labour councils</term>
<term>Legal judgements</term>
<term>Lesbian</term>
<term>Lesbian clubs</term>
<term>Local authorities</term>
<term>Local authority</term>
<term>Local education authorities</term>
<term>Local education committees</term>
<term>Local government</term>
<term>Local government bill</term>
<term>London effect</term>
<term>London lesbian</term>
<term>Longford report</term>
<term>Lord gifford</term>
<term>Male homosexuality</term>
<term>Marriage amendment</term>
<term>Moral community</term>
<term>Moral panic</term>
<term>Norrie</term>
<term>Objective discussion</term>
<term>Other ways</term>
<term>Pink paper</term>
<term>Positive images</term>
<term>Private enterprise</term>
<term>Public money</term>
<term>Public morality</term>
<term>Real concern</term>
<term>Salisbury review</term>
<term>Same basis</term>
<term>Scruton</term>
<term>Sexual behaviour</term>
<term>Sexual offences</term>
<term>Specific reference</term>
<term>Spectator editorial</term>
<term>Sunday times</term>
<term>Thatcher</term>
<term>Whilst</term>
<term>Whilst homosexuality</term>
<term>Wide range</term>
<term>Young people</term>
</keywords>
<keywords scheme="Wicri" type="topic" xml:lang="fr"><term>Collectivité locale</term>
<term>Administration locale</term>
<term>Moralité publique</term>
</keywords>
</textClass>
<langUsage><language ident="en">en</language>
</langUsage>
</profileDesc>
</teiHeader>
<front><div type="abstract" xml:lang="en">Section 28 of the Local Government Act 1988, which states that local authorities may not 'intentionally promote homosexuality' , enjoyed a rela tively quiet first anniversary at the end of May this year which was in marked contrast to the intense political debate and heightened media inter est which attended its birth. This article seeks to explain why, through an examination of Section 28 as law, by an assessment of its ideological locus within neo-conservatism, and by an evaluation of its somewhat ambiguous effects on gay politics and representations of homosexuality.</div>
</front>
</TEI>
</record>
Pour manipuler ce document sous Unix (Dilib)
EXPLOR_STEP=$WICRI_ROOT/Wicri/Santé/explor/EdenteV2/Data/Main/Curation
HfdSelect -h $EXPLOR_STEP/biblio.hfd -nk 00BC82 | SxmlIndent | more
Ou
HfdSelect -h $EXPLOR_AREA/Data/Main/Curation/biblio.hfd -nk 00BC82 | SxmlIndent | more
Pour mettre un lien sur cette page dans le réseau Wicri
{{Explor lien |wiki= Wicri/Santé |area= EdenteV2 |flux= Main |étape= Curation |type= RBID |clé= ISTEX:9A3A5319CDECE17E69178ADFB509C216BD60830B |texte= Section 28: law, myth and paradox }}
![]() | This area was generated with Dilib version V0.6.32. | ![]() |