Serveur d'exploration sur le patient édenté

Attention, ce site est en cours de développement !
Attention, site généré par des moyens informatiques à partir de corpus bruts.
Les informations ne sont donc pas validées.

A comparative study of tracheal intubation using an intubating laryngeal mask (Fastrach) alone or together with a lightwand (Trachlight)

Identifieur interne : 009045 ( Main/Curation ); précédent : 009044; suivant : 009046

A comparative study of tracheal intubation using an intubating laryngeal mask (Fastrach) alone or together with a lightwand (Trachlight)

Auteurs : Kathy H. Fan [Canada] ; Orlando R. Hung [Canada] ; Felice Agro [Italie]

Source :

RBID : ISTEX:93F24FD12D522A8A9C22CEA527026FD05EA3A6C3

Descripteurs français

English descriptors

Abstract

Abstract: Study Objective: To determine if the TrachlightTM lightwand can facilitate FastrachTM intubation by guiding the tip of the endotracheal tube into the trachea. Design: Open-label, prospective, randomized, comparative study. Setting: General operating suites of a tertiary teaching hospital. Patients: 172 elective surgical patients requiring general anesthesia with endotracheal intubation. Interventions: With general anesthesia, the Fastrach™, which is a new intubating laryngeal mask airway, was inserted into the oropharynx. Ventilation was ensured before the insertion of an endotracheal tube via the Fastrach™. Tracheal intubation was then performed randomly (coin toss) using either the endotracheal tube alone (Fastrach™ group), or endotracheal tube with the Trachlight, a lightwand (Fastrach/Trachlight™ group). The time to place the Fastrach™ and endotracheal tube, to remove the Fastrach™, and the total time to intubate were recorded. The number of attempts, failures, trauma, sore throats, and hemodynamic changes were also recorded. Data were analyzed using unpaired t-test, ANOVA with repeated measures, or Chi-squares contingency table where appropriate. Measurements and Main Results: Although there were no differences in the times to place the Fastrach™, and endotracheal tube, the hemodynamic changes, and postoperative complications, there were significantly more attempts and failures in the Fastrach™ group compared to the Fastrach™/Trachlight™ group. There were no differences in the incidence of sore throat and trauma in between the groups. Conclusions: Although tracheal intubation is effective using a Fastrach™ alone (76% success rate), it is more effective when the Fastrach™ is used in conjunction with the Trachlight™ (95%). These results suggest that the lightwand is a useful adjunct for Fastrach™ intubation. However, the role of Fastrach™ intubation together with the Trachlight™ in the management of patients with a potential difficult airway remains to be determined.

Url:
DOI: 10.1016/S0952-8180(00)00219-1

Links toward previous steps (curation, corpus...)


Links to Exploration step

ISTEX:93F24FD12D522A8A9C22CEA527026FD05EA3A6C3

Le document en format XML

<record>
<TEI wicri:istexFullTextTei="biblStruct">
<teiHeader>
<fileDesc>
<titleStmt>
<title xml:lang="en">A comparative study of tracheal intubation using an intubating laryngeal mask (Fastrach) alone or together with a lightwand (Trachlight)</title>
<author>
<name sortKey="Fan, Kathy H" sort="Fan, Kathy H" uniqKey="Fan K" first="Kathy H" last="Fan">Kathy H. Fan</name>
</author>
<author>
<name sortKey="Hung, Orlando R" sort="Hung, Orlando R" uniqKey="Hung O" first="Orlando R" last="Hung">Orlando R. Hung</name>
</author>
<author>
<name sortKey="Agro, Felice" sort="Agro, Felice" uniqKey="Agro F" first="Felice" last="Agro">Felice Agro</name>
</author>
</titleStmt>
<publicationStmt>
<idno type="wicri:source">ISTEX</idno>
<idno type="RBID">ISTEX:93F24FD12D522A8A9C22CEA527026FD05EA3A6C3</idno>
<date when="2000" year="2000">2000</date>
<idno type="doi">10.1016/S0952-8180(00)00219-1</idno>
<idno type="url">https://api.istex.fr/document/93F24FD12D522A8A9C22CEA527026FD05EA3A6C3/fulltext/pdf</idno>
<idno type="wicri:Area/Istex/Corpus">004992</idno>
<idno type="wicri:explorRef" wicri:stream="Istex" wicri:step="Corpus" wicri:corpus="ISTEX">004992</idno>
<idno type="wicri:Area/Istex/Curation">004992</idno>
<idno type="wicri:Area/Istex/Checkpoint">004090</idno>
<idno type="wicri:explorRef" wicri:stream="Istex" wicri:step="Checkpoint">004090</idno>
<idno type="wicri:doubleKey">0952-8180:2000:Fan K:a:comparative:study</idno>
<idno type="wicri:Area/Main/Merge">009431</idno>
<idno type="wicri:Area/Main/Curation">009045</idno>
</publicationStmt>
<sourceDesc>
<biblStruct>
<analytic>
<title level="a" type="main" xml:lang="en">A comparative study of tracheal intubation using an intubating laryngeal mask (Fastrach) alone or together with a lightwand (Trachlight)</title>
<author>
<name sortKey="Fan, Kathy H" sort="Fan, Kathy H" uniqKey="Fan K" first="Kathy H" last="Fan">Kathy H. Fan</name>
<affiliation wicri:level="1">
<country xml:lang="fr">Canada</country>
<wicri:regionArea>Departments of Anesthesia and Pharmacology, Dalhousie University, Halifax, Nova Scotia</wicri:regionArea>
<wicri:noRegion>Nova Scotia</wicri:noRegion>
</affiliation>
</author>
<author>
<name sortKey="Hung, Orlando R" sort="Hung, Orlando R" uniqKey="Hung O" first="Orlando R" last="Hung">Orlando R. Hung</name>
<affiliation wicri:level="1">
<country wicri:rule="url">Canada</country>
</affiliation>
<affiliation wicri:level="1">
<country xml:lang="fr">Canada</country>
<wicri:regionArea>Departments of Anesthesia and Pharmacology, Dalhousie University, Halifax, Nova Scotia</wicri:regionArea>
<wicri:noRegion>Nova Scotia</wicri:noRegion>
</affiliation>
</author>
<author>
<name sortKey="Agro, Felice" sort="Agro, Felice" uniqKey="Agro F" first="Felice" last="Agro">Felice Agro</name>
<affiliation wicri:level="3">
<country xml:lang="fr">Italie</country>
<wicri:regionArea>Department of Anaesthesiology, University School of Medicine, Campus BioMedico, Rome</wicri:regionArea>
<placeName>
<settlement type="city">Rome</settlement>
<region nuts="2">Latium</region>
</placeName>
</affiliation>
</author>
</analytic>
<monogr></monogr>
<series>
<title level="j">Journal of Clinical Anesthesia</title>
<title level="j" type="abbrev">JCA</title>
<idno type="ISSN">0952-8180</idno>
<imprint>
<publisher>ELSEVIER</publisher>
<date type="published" when="2000">2000</date>
<biblScope unit="volume">12</biblScope>
<biblScope unit="issue">8</biblScope>
<biblScope unit="page" from="581">581</biblScope>
<biblScope unit="page" to="585">585</biblScope>
</imprint>
<idno type="ISSN">0952-8180</idno>
</series>
</biblStruct>
</sourceDesc>
<seriesStmt>
<idno type="ISSN">0952-8180</idno>
</seriesStmt>
</fileDesc>
<profileDesc>
<textClass>
<keywords scheme="KwdEn" xml:lang="en">
<term>Airway</term>
<term>Anaesth</term>
<term>Anesth</term>
<term>Anesthesia</term>
<term>Anesthetic equipment</term>
<term>Baseline</term>
<term>Blind technique</term>
<term>Blind tracheal intubation</term>
<term>Difficult airway</term>
<term>Endotracheal</term>
<term>Endotracheal tube</term>
<term>Endotracheal unit</term>
<term>Fastrach</term>
<term>General anesthesia</term>
<term>Hemodynamic</term>
<term>Hemodynamic changes</term>
<term>Intubate</term>
<term>Intubating</term>
<term>Intubating laryngeal mask</term>
<term>Intubating laryngeal mask airway</term>
<term>Intubation</term>
<term>Laryngeal</term>
<term>Lightwand</term>
<term>Manual ventilation</term>
<term>Sore throat</term>
<term>Success rate</term>
<term>Total time</term>
<term>Tracheal</term>
<term>Tracheal intubation</term>
<term>Trachlight</term>
<term>Trauma</term>
<term>anesthetic techniques</term>
<term>intubating laryngeal mask airway</term>
<term>lightwand</term>
<term>tracheal intubation</term>
</keywords>
<keywords scheme="Teeft" xml:lang="en">
<term>Airway</term>
<term>Anaesth</term>
<term>Anesth</term>
<term>Anesthesia</term>
<term>Baseline</term>
<term>Blind technique</term>
<term>Blind tracheal intubation</term>
<term>Difficult airway</term>
<term>Endotracheal</term>
<term>Endotracheal tube</term>
<term>Endotracheal unit</term>
<term>Fastrach</term>
<term>General anesthesia</term>
<term>Hemodynamic</term>
<term>Hemodynamic changes</term>
<term>Intubate</term>
<term>Intubating</term>
<term>Intubating laryngeal mask</term>
<term>Intubating laryngeal mask airway</term>
<term>Intubation</term>
<term>Laryngeal</term>
<term>Lightwand</term>
<term>Manual ventilation</term>
<term>Sore throat</term>
<term>Success rate</term>
<term>Total time</term>
<term>Tracheal</term>
<term>Tracheal intubation</term>
<term>Trachlight</term>
<term>Trauma</term>
</keywords>
<keywords scheme="Wicri" type="topic" xml:lang="fr">
<term>Traumatisme</term>
</keywords>
</textClass>
<langUsage>
<language ident="en">en</language>
</langUsage>
</profileDesc>
</teiHeader>
<front>
<div type="abstract" xml:lang="en">Abstract: Study Objective: To determine if the TrachlightTM lightwand can facilitate FastrachTM intubation by guiding the tip of the endotracheal tube into the trachea. Design: Open-label, prospective, randomized, comparative study. Setting: General operating suites of a tertiary teaching hospital. Patients: 172 elective surgical patients requiring general anesthesia with endotracheal intubation. Interventions: With general anesthesia, the Fastrach™, which is a new intubating laryngeal mask airway, was inserted into the oropharynx. Ventilation was ensured before the insertion of an endotracheal tube via the Fastrach™. Tracheal intubation was then performed randomly (coin toss) using either the endotracheal tube alone (Fastrach™ group), or endotracheal tube with the Trachlight, a lightwand (Fastrach/Trachlight™ group). The time to place the Fastrach™ and endotracheal tube, to remove the Fastrach™, and the total time to intubate were recorded. The number of attempts, failures, trauma, sore throats, and hemodynamic changes were also recorded. Data were analyzed using unpaired t-test, ANOVA with repeated measures, or Chi-squares contingency table where appropriate. Measurements and Main Results: Although there were no differences in the times to place the Fastrach™, and endotracheal tube, the hemodynamic changes, and postoperative complications, there were significantly more attempts and failures in the Fastrach™ group compared to the Fastrach™/Trachlight™ group. There were no differences in the incidence of sore throat and trauma in between the groups. Conclusions: Although tracheal intubation is effective using a Fastrach™ alone (76% success rate), it is more effective when the Fastrach™ is used in conjunction with the Trachlight™ (95%). These results suggest that the lightwand is a useful adjunct for Fastrach™ intubation. However, the role of Fastrach™ intubation together with the Trachlight™ in the management of patients with a potential difficult airway remains to be determined.</div>
</front>
</TEI>
</record>

Pour manipuler ce document sous Unix (Dilib)

EXPLOR_STEP=$WICRI_ROOT/Wicri/Santé/explor/EdenteV2/Data/Main/Curation
HfdSelect -h $EXPLOR_STEP/biblio.hfd -nk 009045 | SxmlIndent | more

Ou

HfdSelect -h $EXPLOR_AREA/Data/Main/Curation/biblio.hfd -nk 009045 | SxmlIndent | more

Pour mettre un lien sur cette page dans le réseau Wicri

{{Explor lien
   |wiki=    Wicri/Santé
   |area=    EdenteV2
   |flux=    Main
   |étape=   Curation
   |type=    RBID
   |clé=     ISTEX:93F24FD12D522A8A9C22CEA527026FD05EA3A6C3
   |texte=   A comparative study of tracheal intubation using an intubating laryngeal mask (Fastrach) alone or together with a lightwand (Trachlight)
}}

Wicri

This area was generated with Dilib version V0.6.32.
Data generation: Thu Nov 30 15:26:48 2017. Site generation: Tue Mar 8 16:36:20 2022