Implant versus tooth‐implant supported prostheses in the posterior maxilla: a 2‐year report
Identifieur interne : 008984 ( Main/Curation ); précédent : 008983; suivant : 008985Implant versus tooth‐implant supported prostheses in the posterior maxilla: a 2‐year report
Auteurs : Tomas Lindh [Suède] ; Johan Gunne ; Elisabeth Nyström ; Tomas B Ck [Suède]Source :
- Clinical Oral Implants Research [ 0905-7161 ] ; 2001-10.
Descripteurs français
- KwdFr :
- Adulte d'âge moyen, Analyse de survie, Conception d'appareil de prothèse dentaire, Contrainte mécanique, Dent, Femelle, Humains, Implants dentaires, Maladies du maxillaire supérieur (étiologie), Maxillaire (), Mise en charge, Mâchoire partiellement édentée (), Mâchoire partiellement édentée (rééducation et réadaptation), Mâle, Piliers dentaires, Prothèse dentaire implanto-portée, Prothèse partielle fixe, Résorption osseuse (étiologie), Statistique non paramétrique, Statistiques comme sujet, Sujet âgé, Sujet âgé de 80 ans ou plus, Tables de survie, Taille d'échantillon, Échec de restauration dentaire, Études de suivi, Études longitudinales.
- MESH :
- rééducation et réadaptation : Mâchoire partiellement édentée.
- étiologie : Maladies du maxillaire supérieur, Résorption osseuse.
- Adulte d'âge moyen, Analyse de survie, Conception d'appareil de prothèse dentaire, Contrainte mécanique, Dent, Femelle, Humains, Implants dentaires, Maxillaire, Mise en charge, Mâchoire partiellement édentée, Mâle, Piliers dentaires, Prothèse dentaire implanto-portée, Prothèse partielle fixe, Statistique non paramétrique, Statistiques comme sujet, Sujet âgé, Sujet âgé de 80 ans ou plus, Tables de survie, Taille d'échantillon, Échec de restauration dentaire, Études de suivi, Études longitudinales.
English descriptors
- KwdEn :
- Abutment, Abutment screws, Abutment teeth, Abutment tooth, Aged, Aged, 80 and over, Anterior implant, Baseline, Biocare, Biological factors, Bone Resorption (etiology), Bone density, Bone loss, Bone quality, Bone response, Bone volume, Clin, Clinical dentistry, Clinical periodontology, Contralateral side, Cumulative survival rate, Dental Abutments, Dental Implants, Dental Prosthesis, Implant-Supported, Dental Restoration Failure, Dentistry, Dentition, Denture Design, Denture, Partial, Fixed, Different prosthesis designs, Edentulous, Edentulous jaws, European journal, Excessive occlusal, Failure rate, Female, Follow-Up Studies, Fracture, Functional loads, Gunne, Healing period, Healing time, Humans, Impl, Implant, Implant losses, Implant placement, Implant site, Implant sites, Implant success, Implant treatment, Implantes, Implants research, Individual patient, International journal, Intraoral radiographs, Jaw, Edentulous, Partially (rehabilitation), Jaw, Edentulous, Partially (surgery), Lekholm, Lekholm zarb, Life Tables, Lindh, Longitudinal Studies, Longitudinal study, Male, Many patients, Marginal bone, Marginal bone height, Marginal bone level, Marginal mucosa, Maxilla, Maxilla (surgery), Maxillary, Maxillary Diseases (etiology), Maxillary sinus, Maxillofacial, Maxillofacial implants, Mechanical consequences, Middle Aged, Modeles differents, More implants, Mucosal margin, Natural abutment, Natural abutments, Natural teeth, Natural tooth, Nobel biocare, Oral impl, Osseointegrated, Osseointegrated implants, Partial edentulism, Partial prostheses, Patient selection, Periodontal probe, Pocket depth, Posterior implants, Posterior maxilla, Posterior maxilla table, Present study, Primary response, Prosthesis, Prosthesis design, Prosthesis designs, Prosthesis insertion, Prosthetic, Prosthetic dentistry, Pterygomaxillary implants, Quintessence publishing company, Radiograph, Residual, Residual dentition, Resistance measurements, Sample Size, Second premolar, Statistics as Topic, Statistics, Nonparametric, Stress, Mechanical, Study period, Success criteria, Survival Analysis, Survival rate, Survival rates, Temporary cement, Tisp, Tomas lindh, Tooth, Tooth intrusion, Tooth mobility, Torque values, Upplands vasby, Weight-Bearing, Zarb.
- MESH :
- chemical : Dental Implants.
- etiology : Bone Resorption, Maxillary Diseases.
- rehabilitation : Jaw, Edentulous, Partially.
- surgery : Jaw, Edentulous, Partially, Maxilla.
- Teeft :
- Abutment, Abutment screws, Abutment teeth, Abutment tooth, Aged, Aged, 80 and over, Anterior implant, Baseline, Biocare, Biological factors, Bone density, Bone loss, Bone quality, Bone response, Bone volume, Clin, Clinical dentistry, Clinical periodontology, Contralateral side, Cumulative survival rate, Dental Abutments, Dental Prosthesis, Implant-Supported, Dental Restoration Failure, Dentistry, Dentition, Denture Design, Denture, Partial, Fixed, Different prosthesis designs, Edentulous, Edentulous jaws, European journal, Excessive occlusal, Failure rate, Female, Follow-Up Studies, Fracture, Functional loads, Gunne, Healing period, Healing time, Humans, Impl, Implant, Implant losses, Implant placement, Implant site, Implant sites, Implant success, Implant treatment, Implantes, Implants research, Individual patient, International journal, Intraoral radiographs, Lekholm, Lekholm zarb, Life Tables, Lindh, Longitudinal Studies, Longitudinal study, Male, Many patients, Marginal bone, Marginal bone height, Marginal bone level, Marginal mucosa, Maxilla, Maxillary, Maxillary sinus, Maxillofacial, Maxillofacial implants, Mechanical consequences, Middle Aged, Modeles differents, More implants, Mucosal margin, Natural abutment, Natural abutments, Natural teeth, Natural tooth, Nobel biocare, Oral impl, Osseointegrated, Osseointegrated implants, Partial edentulism, Partial prostheses, Patient selection, Periodontal probe, Pocket depth, Posterior implants, Posterior maxilla, Posterior maxilla table, Present study, Primary response, Prosthesis, Prosthesis design, Prosthesis designs, Prosthesis insertion, Prosthetic, Prosthetic dentistry, Pterygomaxillary implants, Quintessence publishing company, Radiograph, Residual, Residual dentition, Resistance measurements, Sample Size, Second premolar, Statistics as Topic, Statistics, Nonparametric, Stress, Mechanical, Study period, Success criteria, Survival Analysis, Survival rate, Survival rates, Temporary cement, Tisp, Tomas lindh, Tooth, Tooth intrusion, Tooth mobility, Torque values, Upplands vasby, Weight-Bearing, Zarb.
Abstract
Abstract: When implants are used for restoration of a jaw with a residual dentition, the possibility of combining implants with natural abutments may be considered. In a longitudinal comparative study, 26 patients (15 women & 11 men, age 49–84 years) with residual anterior dentitions were treated with two different designs of fixed partial dentures bilaterally in the posterior maxilla. On one side the reconstruction was supported by implants only, while on the contralateral side an implant and a tooth in combination were used. The patients were followed at intervals of 3, 6, 12 and 24 months after loading of the implants. 95 implants were placed, of which 11 non‐loaded. A total of 10 implants failed, 7 prior to loading and three within the first three months of service (88.0±SE 6.7% cumulative survival for tested implants after two years’ follow‐up). There was no difference in failure rate for the implants in the two different prosthesis designs. The total mean loss of marginal bone height close to the implants was within acceptable standards, but was more pronounced at the implants not combined with teeth. The results indicate a correlation between the prosthesis design and the loss of marginal bone.
Url:
DOI: 10.1034/j.1600-0501.2001.120503.x
Links toward previous steps (curation, corpus...)
- to stream Istex, to step Corpus: Pour aller vers cette notice dans l'étape Curation :000559
- to stream Istex, to step Curation: Pour aller vers cette notice dans l'étape Curation :000559
- to stream Istex, to step Checkpoint: Pour aller vers cette notice dans l'étape Curation :003C01
- to stream Main, to step Merge: Pour aller vers cette notice dans l'étape Curation :008D15
- to stream PubMed, to step Corpus: Pour aller vers cette notice dans l'étape Curation :003376
- to stream PubMed, to step Curation: Pour aller vers cette notice dans l'étape Curation :003376
- to stream PubMed, to step Checkpoint: Pour aller vers cette notice dans l'étape Curation :003376
- to stream Ncbi, to step Merge: Pour aller vers cette notice dans l'étape Curation :000694
- to stream Ncbi, to step Curation: Pour aller vers cette notice dans l'étape Curation :000694
- to stream Ncbi, to step Checkpoint: Pour aller vers cette notice dans l'étape Curation :000694
- to stream Main, to step Merge: Pour aller vers cette notice dans l'étape Curation :008A20
Links to Exploration step
ISTEX:0BD040A7105D9C6891767264E7FE940E09ED881ACuration
No country items
Johan Gunne<affiliation><wicri:noCountry code="subField">Umeå.</wicri:noCountry></affiliation><affiliation><wicri:noCountry code="subField">Umeå.</wicri:noCountry></affiliation>Le document en format XML
<record><TEI wicri:istexFullTextTei="biblStruct"><teiHeader><fileDesc><titleStmt><title xml:lang="en">Implant versus tooth‐implant supported prostheses in the posterior maxilla: a 2‐year report</title><author><name sortKey="Lindh, Tomas" sort="Lindh, Tomas" uniqKey="Lindh T" first="Tomas" last="Lindh">Tomas Lindh</name></author><author><name sortKey="Gunne, Johan" sort="Gunne, Johan" uniqKey="Gunne J" first="Johan" last="Gunne">Johan Gunne</name></author><author><name sortKey="Nystrom, Elisabeth" sort="Nystrom, Elisabeth" uniqKey="Nystrom E" first="Elisabeth" last="Nyström">Elisabeth Nyström</name></author><author><name sortKey="B Ck, Tomas" sort="B Ck, Tomas" uniqKey="B Ck T" first="Tomas" last="B Ck">Tomas B Ck</name></author></titleStmt><publicationStmt><idno type="wicri:source">ISTEX</idno><idno type="RBID">ISTEX:0BD040A7105D9C6891767264E7FE940E09ED881A</idno><date when="2001" year="2001">2001</date><idno type="doi">10.1034/j.1600-0501.2001.120503.x</idno><idno type="url">https://api.istex.fr/document/0BD040A7105D9C6891767264E7FE940E09ED881A/fulltext/pdf</idno><idno type="wicri:Area/Istex/Corpus">000559</idno><idno type="wicri:explorRef" wicri:stream="Istex" wicri:step="Corpus" wicri:corpus="ISTEX">000559</idno><idno type="wicri:Area/Istex/Curation">000559</idno><idno type="wicri:Area/Istex/Checkpoint">003C01</idno><idno type="wicri:explorRef" wicri:stream="Istex" wicri:step="Checkpoint">003C01</idno><idno type="wicri:doubleKey">0905-7161:2001:Lindh T:implant:versus:tooth</idno><idno type="wicri:Area/Main/Merge">008D15</idno><idno type="wicri:source">PubMed</idno><idno type="RBID">pubmed:11564103</idno><idno type="wicri:Area/PubMed/Corpus">003376</idno><idno type="wicri:explorRef" wicri:stream="PubMed" wicri:step="Corpus" wicri:corpus="PubMed">003376</idno><idno type="wicri:Area/PubMed/Curation">003376</idno><idno type="wicri:explorRef" wicri:stream="PubMed" wicri:step="Curation">003376</idno><idno type="wicri:Area/PubMed/Checkpoint">003376</idno><idno type="wicri:explorRef" wicri:stream="Checkpoint" wicri:step="PubMed">003376</idno><idno type="wicri:Area/Ncbi/Merge">000694</idno><idno type="wicri:Area/Ncbi/Curation">000694</idno><idno type="wicri:Area/Ncbi/Checkpoint">000694</idno><idno type="wicri:doubleKey">0905-7161:2001:Lindh T:implant:versus:tooth</idno><idno type="wicri:Area/Main/Merge">008A20</idno><idno type="wicri:Area/Main/Curation">008984</idno></publicationStmt><sourceDesc><biblStruct><analytic><title level="a" type="main">Implant versus tooth‐implant supported prostheses in the posterior maxilla: a 2‐year report</title><author><name sortKey="Lindh, Tomas" sort="Lindh, Tomas" uniqKey="Lindh T" first="Tomas" last="Lindh">Tomas Lindh</name><affiliation></affiliation><affiliation wicri:level="1"><country wicri:rule="url">Suède</country></affiliation></author><author><name sortKey="Gunne, Johan" sort="Gunne, Johan" uniqKey="Gunne J" first="Johan" last="Gunne">Johan Gunne</name><affiliation><wicri:noCountry code="subField">Umeå.</wicri:noCountry></affiliation></author><author><name sortKey="Nystrom, Elisabeth" sort="Nystrom, Elisabeth" uniqKey="Nystrom E" first="Elisabeth" last="Nyström">Elisabeth Nyström</name><affiliation><wicri:noCountry code="subField">Umeå.</wicri:noCountry></affiliation></author><author><name sortKey="B Ck, Tomas" sort="B Ck, Tomas" uniqKey="B Ck T" first="Tomas" last="B Ck">Tomas B Ck</name><affiliation wicri:level="1"><country xml:lang="fr">Suède</country><wicri:regionArea>Nobel Biocare AB, Gothenburg</wicri:regionArea><wicri:noRegion>Gothenburg</wicri:noRegion></affiliation></author></analytic><monogr></monogr><series><title level="j" type="main">Clinical Oral Implants Research</title><title level="j" type="alt">CLINICAL ORAL IMPLANTS RESEARCH</title><idno type="ISSN">0905-7161</idno><idno type="eISSN">1600-0501</idno><imprint><biblScope unit="vol">12</biblScope><biblScope unit="issue">5</biblScope><biblScope unit="page" from="441">441</biblScope><biblScope unit="page" to="449">449</biblScope><biblScope unit="page-count">9</biblScope><publisher>Munksgaard International Publishers</publisher><pubPlace>Copenhagen</pubPlace><date type="published" when="2001-10">2001-10</date></imprint><idno type="ISSN">0905-7161</idno></series></biblStruct></sourceDesc><seriesStmt><idno type="ISSN">0905-7161</idno></seriesStmt></fileDesc><profileDesc><textClass><keywords scheme="KwdEn" xml:lang="en"><term>Abutment</term><term>Abutment screws</term><term>Abutment teeth</term><term>Abutment tooth</term><term>Aged</term><term>Aged, 80 and over</term><term>Anterior implant</term><term>Baseline</term><term>Biocare</term><term>Biological factors</term><term>Bone Resorption (etiology)</term><term>Bone density</term><term>Bone loss</term><term>Bone quality</term><term>Bone response</term><term>Bone volume</term><term>Clin</term><term>Clinical dentistry</term><term>Clinical periodontology</term><term>Contralateral side</term><term>Cumulative survival rate</term><term>Dental Abutments</term><term>Dental Implants</term><term>Dental Prosthesis, Implant-Supported</term><term>Dental Restoration Failure</term><term>Dentistry</term><term>Dentition</term><term>Denture Design</term><term>Denture, Partial, Fixed</term><term>Different prosthesis designs</term><term>Edentulous</term><term>Edentulous jaws</term><term>European journal</term><term>Excessive occlusal</term><term>Failure rate</term><term>Female</term><term>Follow-Up Studies</term><term>Fracture</term><term>Functional loads</term><term>Gunne</term><term>Healing period</term><term>Healing time</term><term>Humans</term><term>Impl</term><term>Implant</term><term>Implant losses</term><term>Implant placement</term><term>Implant site</term><term>Implant sites</term><term>Implant success</term><term>Implant treatment</term><term>Implantes</term><term>Implants research</term><term>Individual patient</term><term>International journal</term><term>Intraoral radiographs</term><term>Jaw, Edentulous, Partially (rehabilitation)</term><term>Jaw, Edentulous, Partially (surgery)</term><term>Lekholm</term><term>Lekholm zarb</term><term>Life Tables</term><term>Lindh</term><term>Longitudinal Studies</term><term>Longitudinal study</term><term>Male</term><term>Many patients</term><term>Marginal bone</term><term>Marginal bone height</term><term>Marginal bone level</term><term>Marginal mucosa</term><term>Maxilla</term><term>Maxilla (surgery)</term><term>Maxillary</term><term>Maxillary Diseases (etiology)</term><term>Maxillary sinus</term><term>Maxillofacial</term><term>Maxillofacial implants</term><term>Mechanical consequences</term><term>Middle Aged</term><term>Modeles differents</term><term>More implants</term><term>Mucosal margin</term><term>Natural abutment</term><term>Natural abutments</term><term>Natural teeth</term><term>Natural tooth</term><term>Nobel biocare</term><term>Oral impl</term><term>Osseointegrated</term><term>Osseointegrated implants</term><term>Partial edentulism</term><term>Partial prostheses</term><term>Patient selection</term><term>Periodontal probe</term><term>Pocket depth</term><term>Posterior implants</term><term>Posterior maxilla</term><term>Posterior maxilla table</term><term>Present study</term><term>Primary response</term><term>Prosthesis</term><term>Prosthesis design</term><term>Prosthesis designs</term><term>Prosthesis insertion</term><term>Prosthetic</term><term>Prosthetic dentistry</term><term>Pterygomaxillary implants</term><term>Quintessence publishing company</term><term>Radiograph</term><term>Residual</term><term>Residual dentition</term><term>Resistance measurements</term><term>Sample Size</term><term>Second premolar</term><term>Statistics as Topic</term><term>Statistics, Nonparametric</term><term>Stress, Mechanical</term><term>Study period</term><term>Success criteria</term><term>Survival Analysis</term><term>Survival rate</term><term>Survival rates</term><term>Temporary cement</term><term>Tisp</term><term>Tomas lindh</term><term>Tooth</term><term>Tooth intrusion</term><term>Tooth mobility</term><term>Torque values</term><term>Upplands vasby</term><term>Weight-Bearing</term><term>Zarb</term></keywords><keywords scheme="KwdFr" xml:lang="fr"><term>Adulte d'âge moyen</term><term>Analyse de survie</term><term>Conception d'appareil de prothèse dentaire</term><term>Contrainte mécanique</term><term>Dent</term><term>Femelle</term><term>Humains</term><term>Implants dentaires</term><term>Maladies du maxillaire supérieur (étiologie)</term><term>Maxillaire ()</term><term>Mise en charge</term><term>Mâchoire partiellement édentée ()</term><term>Mâchoire partiellement édentée (rééducation et réadaptation)</term><term>Mâle</term><term>Piliers dentaires</term><term>Prothèse dentaire implanto-portée</term><term>Prothèse partielle fixe</term><term>Résorption osseuse (étiologie)</term><term>Statistique non paramétrique</term><term>Statistiques comme sujet</term><term>Sujet âgé</term><term>Sujet âgé de 80 ans ou plus</term><term>Tables de survie</term><term>Taille d'échantillon</term><term>Échec de restauration dentaire</term><term>Études de suivi</term><term>Études longitudinales</term></keywords><keywords scheme="MESH" type="chemical" xml:lang="en"><term>Dental Implants</term></keywords><keywords scheme="MESH" qualifier="etiology" xml:lang="en"><term>Bone Resorption</term><term>Maxillary Diseases</term></keywords><keywords scheme="MESH" qualifier="rehabilitation" xml:lang="en"><term>Jaw, Edentulous, Partially</term></keywords><keywords scheme="MESH" qualifier="rééducation et réadaptation" xml:lang="fr"><term>Mâchoire partiellement édentée</term></keywords><keywords scheme="MESH" qualifier="surgery" xml:lang="en"><term>Jaw, Edentulous, Partially</term><term>Maxilla</term></keywords><keywords scheme="MESH" qualifier="étiologie" xml:lang="fr"><term>Maladies du maxillaire supérieur</term><term>Résorption osseuse</term></keywords><keywords scheme="Teeft" xml:lang="en"><term>Abutment</term><term>Abutment screws</term><term>Abutment teeth</term><term>Abutment tooth</term><term>Aged</term><term>Aged, 80 and over</term><term>Anterior implant</term><term>Baseline</term><term>Biocare</term><term>Biological factors</term><term>Bone density</term><term>Bone loss</term><term>Bone quality</term><term>Bone response</term><term>Bone volume</term><term>Clin</term><term>Clinical dentistry</term><term>Clinical periodontology</term><term>Contralateral side</term><term>Cumulative survival rate</term><term>Dental Abutments</term><term>Dental Prosthesis, Implant-Supported</term><term>Dental Restoration Failure</term><term>Dentistry</term><term>Dentition</term><term>Denture Design</term><term>Denture, Partial, Fixed</term><term>Different prosthesis designs</term><term>Edentulous</term><term>Edentulous jaws</term><term>European journal</term><term>Excessive occlusal</term><term>Failure rate</term><term>Female</term><term>Follow-Up Studies</term><term>Fracture</term><term>Functional loads</term><term>Gunne</term><term>Healing period</term><term>Healing time</term><term>Humans</term><term>Impl</term><term>Implant</term><term>Implant losses</term><term>Implant placement</term><term>Implant site</term><term>Implant sites</term><term>Implant success</term><term>Implant treatment</term><term>Implantes</term><term>Implants research</term><term>Individual patient</term><term>International journal</term><term>Intraoral radiographs</term><term>Lekholm</term><term>Lekholm zarb</term><term>Life Tables</term><term>Lindh</term><term>Longitudinal Studies</term><term>Longitudinal study</term><term>Male</term><term>Many patients</term><term>Marginal bone</term><term>Marginal bone height</term><term>Marginal bone level</term><term>Marginal mucosa</term><term>Maxilla</term><term>Maxillary</term><term>Maxillary sinus</term><term>Maxillofacial</term><term>Maxillofacial implants</term><term>Mechanical consequences</term><term>Middle Aged</term><term>Modeles differents</term><term>More implants</term><term>Mucosal margin</term><term>Natural abutment</term><term>Natural abutments</term><term>Natural teeth</term><term>Natural tooth</term><term>Nobel biocare</term><term>Oral impl</term><term>Osseointegrated</term><term>Osseointegrated implants</term><term>Partial edentulism</term><term>Partial prostheses</term><term>Patient selection</term><term>Periodontal probe</term><term>Pocket depth</term><term>Posterior implants</term><term>Posterior maxilla</term><term>Posterior maxilla table</term><term>Present study</term><term>Primary response</term><term>Prosthesis</term><term>Prosthesis design</term><term>Prosthesis designs</term><term>Prosthesis insertion</term><term>Prosthetic</term><term>Prosthetic dentistry</term><term>Pterygomaxillary implants</term><term>Quintessence publishing company</term><term>Radiograph</term><term>Residual</term><term>Residual dentition</term><term>Resistance measurements</term><term>Sample Size</term><term>Second premolar</term><term>Statistics as Topic</term><term>Statistics, Nonparametric</term><term>Stress, Mechanical</term><term>Study period</term><term>Success criteria</term><term>Survival Analysis</term><term>Survival rate</term><term>Survival rates</term><term>Temporary cement</term><term>Tisp</term><term>Tomas lindh</term><term>Tooth</term><term>Tooth intrusion</term><term>Tooth mobility</term><term>Torque values</term><term>Upplands vasby</term><term>Weight-Bearing</term><term>Zarb</term></keywords><keywords scheme="MESH" xml:lang="fr"><term>Adulte d'âge moyen</term><term>Analyse de survie</term><term>Conception d'appareil de prothèse dentaire</term><term>Contrainte mécanique</term><term>Dent</term><term>Femelle</term><term>Humains</term><term>Implants dentaires</term><term>Maxillaire</term><term>Mise en charge</term><term>Mâchoire partiellement édentée</term><term>Mâle</term><term>Piliers dentaires</term><term>Prothèse dentaire implanto-portée</term><term>Prothèse partielle fixe</term><term>Statistique non paramétrique</term><term>Statistiques comme sujet</term><term>Sujet âgé</term><term>Sujet âgé de 80 ans ou plus</term><term>Tables de survie</term><term>Taille d'échantillon</term><term>Échec de restauration dentaire</term><term>Études de suivi</term><term>Études longitudinales</term></keywords></textClass></profileDesc></teiHeader><front><div type="abstract">Abstract: When implants are used for restoration of a jaw with a residual dentition, the possibility of combining implants with natural abutments may be considered. In a longitudinal comparative study, 26 patients (15 women & 11 men, age 49–84 years) with residual anterior dentitions were treated with two different designs of fixed partial dentures bilaterally in the posterior maxilla. On one side the reconstruction was supported by implants only, while on the contralateral side an implant and a tooth in combination were used. The patients were followed at intervals of 3, 6, 12 and 24 months after loading of the implants. 95 implants were placed, of which 11 non‐loaded. A total of 10 implants failed, 7 prior to loading and three within the first three months of service (88.0±SE 6.7% cumulative survival for tested implants after two years’ follow‐up). There was no difference in failure rate for the implants in the two different prosthesis designs. The total mean loss of marginal bone height close to the implants was within acceptable standards, but was more pronounced at the implants not combined with teeth. The results indicate a correlation between the prosthesis design and the loss of marginal bone.</div></front></TEI><double idat="0905-7161:2001:Lindh T:implant:versus:tooth"><ISTEX><TEI wicri:istexFullTextTei="biblStruct"><teiHeader><fileDesc><titleStmt><title xml:lang="en">Implant versus tooth‐implant supported prostheses in the posterior maxilla: a 2‐year report</title><author><name sortKey="Lindh, Tomas" sort="Lindh, Tomas" uniqKey="Lindh T" first="Tomas" last="Lindh">Tomas Lindh</name></author><author><name sortKey="Gunne, Johan" sort="Gunne, Johan" uniqKey="Gunne J" first="Johan" last="Gunne">Johan Gunne</name></author><author><name sortKey="Nystrom, Elisabeth" sort="Nystrom, Elisabeth" uniqKey="Nystrom E" first="Elisabeth" last="Nyström">Elisabeth Nyström</name></author><author><name sortKey="B Ck, Tomas" sort="B Ck, Tomas" uniqKey="B Ck T" first="Tomas" last="B Ck">Tomas B Ck</name></author></titleStmt><publicationStmt><idno type="wicri:source">ISTEX</idno><idno type="RBID">ISTEX:0BD040A7105D9C6891767264E7FE940E09ED881A</idno><date when="2001" year="2001">2001</date><idno type="doi">10.1034/j.1600-0501.2001.120503.x</idno><idno type="url">https://api.istex.fr/document/0BD040A7105D9C6891767264E7FE940E09ED881A/fulltext/pdf</idno><idno type="wicri:Area/Istex/Corpus">000559</idno><idno type="wicri:explorRef" wicri:stream="Istex" wicri:step="Corpus" wicri:corpus="ISTEX">000559</idno><idno type="wicri:Area/Istex/Curation">000559</idno><idno type="wicri:Area/Istex/Checkpoint">003C01</idno><idno type="wicri:explorRef" wicri:stream="Istex" wicri:step="Checkpoint">003C01</idno><idno type="wicri:doubleKey">0905-7161:2001:Lindh T:implant:versus:tooth</idno><idno type="wicri:Area/Main/Merge">008D15</idno></publicationStmt><sourceDesc><biblStruct><analytic><title level="a" type="main">Implant versus tooth‐implant supported prostheses in the posterior maxilla: a 2‐year report</title><author><name sortKey="Lindh, Tomas" sort="Lindh, Tomas" uniqKey="Lindh T" first="Tomas" last="Lindh">Tomas Lindh</name><affiliation></affiliation><affiliation wicri:level="1"><country wicri:rule="url">Suède</country></affiliation></author><author><name sortKey="Gunne, Johan" sort="Gunne, Johan" uniqKey="Gunne J" first="Johan" last="Gunne">Johan Gunne</name><affiliation><wicri:noCountry code="subField">Umeå.</wicri:noCountry></affiliation></author><author><name sortKey="Nystrom, Elisabeth" sort="Nystrom, Elisabeth" uniqKey="Nystrom E" first="Elisabeth" last="Nyström">Elisabeth Nyström</name><affiliation><wicri:noCountry code="subField">Umeå.</wicri:noCountry></affiliation></author><author><name sortKey="B Ck, Tomas" sort="B Ck, Tomas" uniqKey="B Ck T" first="Tomas" last="B Ck">Tomas B Ck</name><affiliation wicri:level="1"><country xml:lang="fr">Suède</country><wicri:regionArea>Nobel Biocare AB, Gothenburg</wicri:regionArea><wicri:noRegion>Gothenburg</wicri:noRegion></affiliation></author></analytic><monogr></monogr><series><title level="j" type="main">Clinical Oral Implants Research</title><title level="j" type="alt">CLINICAL ORAL IMPLANTS RESEARCH</title><idno type="ISSN">0905-7161</idno><idno type="eISSN">1600-0501</idno><imprint><biblScope unit="vol">12</biblScope><biblScope unit="issue">5</biblScope><biblScope unit="page" from="441">441</biblScope><biblScope unit="page" to="449">449</biblScope><biblScope unit="page-count">9</biblScope><publisher>Munksgaard International Publishers</publisher><pubPlace>Copenhagen</pubPlace><date type="published" when="2001-10">2001-10</date></imprint><idno type="ISSN">0905-7161</idno></series></biblStruct></sourceDesc><seriesStmt><idno type="ISSN">0905-7161</idno></seriesStmt></fileDesc><profileDesc><textClass><keywords scheme="KwdEn" xml:lang="en"><term>Abutment</term><term>Abutment screws</term><term>Abutment teeth</term><term>Abutment tooth</term><term>Anterior implant</term><term>Baseline</term><term>Biocare</term><term>Biological factors</term><term>Bone density</term><term>Bone loss</term><term>Bone quality</term><term>Bone response</term><term>Bone volume</term><term>Clin</term><term>Clinical dentistry</term><term>Clinical periodontology</term><term>Contralateral side</term><term>Cumulative survival rate</term><term>Dentistry</term><term>Dentition</term><term>Different prosthesis designs</term><term>Edentulous</term><term>Edentulous jaws</term><term>European journal</term><term>Excessive occlusal</term><term>Failure rate</term><term>Fracture</term><term>Functional loads</term><term>Gunne</term><term>Healing period</term><term>Healing time</term><term>Impl</term><term>Implant</term><term>Implant losses</term><term>Implant placement</term><term>Implant site</term><term>Implant sites</term><term>Implant success</term><term>Implant treatment</term><term>Implantes</term><term>Implants research</term><term>Individual patient</term><term>International journal</term><term>Intraoral radiographs</term><term>Lekholm</term><term>Lekholm zarb</term><term>Lindh</term><term>Longitudinal study</term><term>Many patients</term><term>Marginal bone</term><term>Marginal bone height</term><term>Marginal bone level</term><term>Marginal mucosa</term><term>Maxilla</term><term>Maxillary</term><term>Maxillary sinus</term><term>Maxillofacial</term><term>Maxillofacial implants</term><term>Mechanical consequences</term><term>Modeles differents</term><term>More implants</term><term>Mucosal margin</term><term>Natural abutment</term><term>Natural abutments</term><term>Natural teeth</term><term>Natural tooth</term><term>Nobel biocare</term><term>Oral impl</term><term>Osseointegrated</term><term>Osseointegrated implants</term><term>Partial edentulism</term><term>Partial prostheses</term><term>Patient selection</term><term>Periodontal probe</term><term>Pocket depth</term><term>Posterior implants</term><term>Posterior maxilla</term><term>Posterior maxilla table</term><term>Present study</term><term>Primary response</term><term>Prosthesis</term><term>Prosthesis design</term><term>Prosthesis designs</term><term>Prosthesis insertion</term><term>Prosthetic</term><term>Prosthetic dentistry</term><term>Pterygomaxillary implants</term><term>Quintessence publishing company</term><term>Radiograph</term><term>Residual</term><term>Residual dentition</term><term>Resistance measurements</term><term>Second premolar</term><term>Study period</term><term>Success criteria</term><term>Survival rate</term><term>Survival rates</term><term>Temporary cement</term><term>Tisp</term><term>Tomas lindh</term><term>Tooth intrusion</term><term>Tooth mobility</term><term>Torque values</term><term>Upplands vasby</term><term>Zarb</term></keywords><keywords scheme="Teeft" xml:lang="en"><term>Abutment</term><term>Abutment screws</term><term>Abutment teeth</term><term>Abutment tooth</term><term>Anterior implant</term><term>Baseline</term><term>Biocare</term><term>Biological factors</term><term>Bone density</term><term>Bone loss</term><term>Bone quality</term><term>Bone response</term><term>Bone volume</term><term>Clin</term><term>Clinical dentistry</term><term>Clinical periodontology</term><term>Contralateral side</term><term>Cumulative survival rate</term><term>Dentistry</term><term>Dentition</term><term>Different prosthesis designs</term><term>Edentulous</term><term>Edentulous jaws</term><term>European journal</term><term>Excessive occlusal</term><term>Failure rate</term><term>Fracture</term><term>Functional loads</term><term>Gunne</term><term>Healing period</term><term>Healing time</term><term>Impl</term><term>Implant</term><term>Implant losses</term><term>Implant placement</term><term>Implant site</term><term>Implant sites</term><term>Implant success</term><term>Implant treatment</term><term>Implantes</term><term>Implants research</term><term>Individual patient</term><term>International journal</term><term>Intraoral radiographs</term><term>Lekholm</term><term>Lekholm zarb</term><term>Lindh</term><term>Longitudinal study</term><term>Many patients</term><term>Marginal bone</term><term>Marginal bone height</term><term>Marginal bone level</term><term>Marginal mucosa</term><term>Maxilla</term><term>Maxillary</term><term>Maxillary sinus</term><term>Maxillofacial</term><term>Maxillofacial implants</term><term>Mechanical consequences</term><term>Modeles differents</term><term>More implants</term><term>Mucosal margin</term><term>Natural abutment</term><term>Natural abutments</term><term>Natural teeth</term><term>Natural tooth</term><term>Nobel biocare</term><term>Oral impl</term><term>Osseointegrated</term><term>Osseointegrated implants</term><term>Partial edentulism</term><term>Partial prostheses</term><term>Patient selection</term><term>Periodontal probe</term><term>Pocket depth</term><term>Posterior implants</term><term>Posterior maxilla</term><term>Posterior maxilla table</term><term>Present study</term><term>Primary response</term><term>Prosthesis</term><term>Prosthesis design</term><term>Prosthesis designs</term><term>Prosthesis insertion</term><term>Prosthetic</term><term>Prosthetic dentistry</term><term>Pterygomaxillary implants</term><term>Quintessence publishing company</term><term>Radiograph</term><term>Residual</term><term>Residual dentition</term><term>Resistance measurements</term><term>Second premolar</term><term>Study period</term><term>Success criteria</term><term>Survival rate</term><term>Survival rates</term><term>Temporary cement</term><term>Tisp</term><term>Tomas lindh</term><term>Tooth intrusion</term><term>Tooth mobility</term><term>Torque values</term><term>Upplands vasby</term><term>Zarb</term></keywords></textClass></profileDesc></teiHeader><front><div type="abstract">Abstract: When implants are used for restoration of a jaw with a residual dentition, the possibility of combining implants with natural abutments may be considered. In a longitudinal comparative study, 26 patients (15 women & 11 men, age 49–84 years) with residual anterior dentitions were treated with two different designs of fixed partial dentures bilaterally in the posterior maxilla. On one side the reconstruction was supported by implants only, while on the contralateral side an implant and a tooth in combination were used. The patients were followed at intervals of 3, 6, 12 and 24 months after loading of the implants. 95 implants were placed, of which 11 non‐loaded. A total of 10 implants failed, 7 prior to loading and three within the first three months of service (88.0±SE 6.7% cumulative survival for tested implants after two years’ follow‐up). There was no difference in failure rate for the implants in the two different prosthesis designs. The total mean loss of marginal bone height close to the implants was within acceptable standards, but was more pronounced at the implants not combined with teeth. The results indicate a correlation between the prosthesis design and the loss of marginal bone.</div></front></TEI></ISTEX><PubMed><TEI><teiHeader><fileDesc><titleStmt><title xml:lang="en">Implant versus tooth-implant supported prostheses in the posterior maxilla: a 2-year report.</title><author><name sortKey="Lindh, T" sort="Lindh, T" uniqKey="Lindh T" first="T" last="Lindh">T. Lindh</name><affiliation wicri:level="1"><nlm:affiliation>Department of Prosthetic Dentistry, Faculty of Medicine and Odontology, Umeå University, SE-901 85 Umeå, Sweden. tomas.lindh@odont.umu.se</nlm:affiliation><country xml:lang="fr">Suède</country><wicri:regionArea>Department of Prosthetic Dentistry, Faculty of Medicine and Odontology, Umeå University, SE-901 85 Umeå</wicri:regionArea><wicri:noRegion>SE-901 85 Umeå</wicri:noRegion></affiliation></author><author><name sortKey="B Ck, T" sort="B Ck, T" uniqKey="B Ck T" first="T" last="B Ck">T. B Ck</name></author><author><name sortKey="Nystrom, E" sort="Nystrom, E" uniqKey="Nystrom E" first="E" last="Nyström">E. Nyström</name></author><author><name sortKey="Gunne, J" sort="Gunne, J" uniqKey="Gunne J" first="J" last="Gunne">J. Gunne</name></author></titleStmt><publicationStmt><idno type="wicri:source">PubMed</idno><date when="2001">2001</date><idno type="RBID">pubmed:11564103</idno><idno type="pmid">11564103</idno><idno type="wicri:Area/PubMed/Corpus">003376</idno><idno type="wicri:explorRef" wicri:stream="PubMed" wicri:step="Corpus" wicri:corpus="PubMed">003376</idno><idno type="wicri:Area/PubMed/Curation">003376</idno><idno type="wicri:explorRef" wicri:stream="PubMed" wicri:step="Curation">003376</idno><idno type="wicri:Area/PubMed/Checkpoint">003376</idno><idno type="wicri:explorRef" wicri:stream="Checkpoint" wicri:step="PubMed">003376</idno><idno type="wicri:Area/Ncbi/Merge">000694</idno><idno type="wicri:Area/Ncbi/Curation">000694</idno><idno type="wicri:Area/Ncbi/Checkpoint">000694</idno><idno type="wicri:doubleKey">0905-7161:2001:Lindh T:implant:versus:tooth</idno><idno type="wicri:Area/Main/Merge">008A20</idno></publicationStmt><sourceDesc><biblStruct><analytic><title xml:lang="en">Implant versus tooth-implant supported prostheses in the posterior maxilla: a 2-year report.</title><author><name sortKey="Lindh, T" sort="Lindh, T" uniqKey="Lindh T" first="T" last="Lindh">T. Lindh</name><affiliation wicri:level="1"><nlm:affiliation>Department of Prosthetic Dentistry, Faculty of Medicine and Odontology, Umeå University, SE-901 85 Umeå, Sweden. tomas.lindh@odont.umu.se</nlm:affiliation><country xml:lang="fr">Suède</country><wicri:regionArea>Department of Prosthetic Dentistry, Faculty of Medicine and Odontology, Umeå University, SE-901 85 Umeå</wicri:regionArea><wicri:noRegion>SE-901 85 Umeå</wicri:noRegion></affiliation></author><author><name sortKey="B Ck, T" sort="B Ck, T" uniqKey="B Ck T" first="T" last="B Ck">T. B Ck</name></author><author><name sortKey="Nystrom, E" sort="Nystrom, E" uniqKey="Nystrom E" first="E" last="Nyström">E. Nyström</name></author><author><name sortKey="Gunne, J" sort="Gunne, J" uniqKey="Gunne J" first="J" last="Gunne">J. Gunne</name></author></analytic><series><title level="j">Clinical oral implants research</title><idno type="ISSN">0905-7161</idno><imprint><date when="2001" type="published">2001</date></imprint></series></biblStruct></sourceDesc></fileDesc><profileDesc><textClass><keywords scheme="KwdEn" xml:lang="en"><term>Aged</term><term>Aged, 80 and over</term><term>Bone Resorption (etiology)</term><term>Dental Abutments</term><term>Dental Implants</term><term>Dental Prosthesis, Implant-Supported</term><term>Dental Restoration Failure</term><term>Denture Design</term><term>Denture, Partial, Fixed</term><term>Female</term><term>Follow-Up Studies</term><term>Humans</term><term>Jaw, Edentulous, Partially (rehabilitation)</term><term>Jaw, Edentulous, Partially (surgery)</term><term>Life Tables</term><term>Longitudinal Studies</term><term>Male</term><term>Maxilla (surgery)</term><term>Maxillary Diseases (etiology)</term><term>Middle Aged</term><term>Sample Size</term><term>Statistics as Topic</term><term>Statistics, Nonparametric</term><term>Stress, Mechanical</term><term>Survival Analysis</term><term>Tooth</term><term>Weight-Bearing</term></keywords><keywords scheme="KwdFr" xml:lang="fr"><term>Adulte d'âge moyen</term><term>Analyse de survie</term><term>Conception d'appareil de prothèse dentaire</term><term>Contrainte mécanique</term><term>Dent</term><term>Femelle</term><term>Humains</term><term>Implants dentaires</term><term>Maladies du maxillaire supérieur (étiologie)</term><term>Maxillaire ()</term><term>Mise en charge</term><term>Mâchoire partiellement édentée ()</term><term>Mâchoire partiellement édentée (rééducation et réadaptation)</term><term>Mâle</term><term>Piliers dentaires</term><term>Prothèse dentaire implanto-portée</term><term>Prothèse partielle fixe</term><term>Résorption osseuse (étiologie)</term><term>Statistique non paramétrique</term><term>Statistiques comme sujet</term><term>Sujet âgé</term><term>Sujet âgé de 80 ans ou plus</term><term>Tables de survie</term><term>Taille d'échantillon</term><term>Échec de restauration dentaire</term><term>Études de suivi</term><term>Études longitudinales</term></keywords><keywords scheme="MESH" type="chemical" xml:lang="en"><term>Dental Implants</term></keywords><keywords scheme="MESH" qualifier="etiology" xml:lang="en"><term>Bone Resorption</term><term>Maxillary Diseases</term></keywords><keywords scheme="MESH" qualifier="rehabilitation" xml:lang="en"><term>Jaw, Edentulous, Partially</term></keywords><keywords scheme="MESH" qualifier="rééducation et réadaptation" xml:lang="fr"><term>Mâchoire partiellement édentée</term></keywords><keywords scheme="MESH" qualifier="surgery" xml:lang="en"><term>Jaw, Edentulous, Partially</term><term>Maxilla</term></keywords><keywords scheme="MESH" qualifier="étiologie" xml:lang="fr"><term>Maladies du maxillaire supérieur</term><term>Résorption osseuse</term></keywords><keywords scheme="MESH" xml:lang="en"><term>Aged</term><term>Aged, 80 and over</term><term>Dental Abutments</term><term>Dental Prosthesis, Implant-Supported</term><term>Dental Restoration Failure</term><term>Denture Design</term><term>Denture, Partial, Fixed</term><term>Female</term><term>Follow-Up Studies</term><term>Humans</term><term>Life Tables</term><term>Longitudinal Studies</term><term>Male</term><term>Middle Aged</term><term>Sample Size</term><term>Statistics as Topic</term><term>Statistics, Nonparametric</term><term>Stress, Mechanical</term><term>Survival Analysis</term><term>Tooth</term><term>Weight-Bearing</term></keywords><keywords scheme="MESH" xml:lang="fr"><term>Adulte d'âge moyen</term><term>Analyse de survie</term><term>Conception d'appareil de prothèse dentaire</term><term>Contrainte mécanique</term><term>Dent</term><term>Femelle</term><term>Humains</term><term>Implants dentaires</term><term>Maxillaire</term><term>Mise en charge</term><term>Mâchoire partiellement édentée</term><term>Mâle</term><term>Piliers dentaires</term><term>Prothèse dentaire implanto-portée</term><term>Prothèse partielle fixe</term><term>Statistique non paramétrique</term><term>Statistiques comme sujet</term><term>Sujet âgé</term><term>Sujet âgé de 80 ans ou plus</term><term>Tables de survie</term><term>Taille d'échantillon</term><term>Échec de restauration dentaire</term><term>Études de suivi</term><term>Études longitudinales</term></keywords></textClass></profileDesc></teiHeader><front><div type="abstract" xml:lang="en">When implants are used for restoration of a jaw with a residual dentition, the possibility of combining implants with natural abutments may be considered. In a longitudinal comparative study, 26 patients (15 women & 11 men, age 49-84 years) with residual anterior dentitions were treated with two different designs of fixed partial dentures bilaterally in the posterior maxilla. On one side the reconstruction was supported by implants only, while on the contralateral side an implant and a tooth in combination were used. The patients were followed at intervals of 3, 6, 12 and 24 months after loading of the implants. 95 implants were placed, of which 11 non-loaded. A total of 10 implants failed, 7 prior to loading and three within the first three months of service (88.0+/-SE 6.7% cumulative survival for tested implants after two years' follow-up). There was no difference in failure rate for the implants in the two different prosthesis designs. The total mean loss of marginal bone height close to the implants was within acceptable standards, but was more pronounced at the implants not combined with teeth. The results indicate a correlation between the prosthesis design and the loss of marginal bone.</div></front></TEI></PubMed></double></record>Pour manipuler ce document sous Unix (Dilib)
EXPLOR_STEP=$WICRI_ROOT/Wicri/Santé/explor/EdenteV2/Data/Main/Curation
HfdSelect -h $EXPLOR_STEP/biblio.hfd -nk 008984 | SxmlIndent | more
Ou
HfdSelect -h $EXPLOR_AREA/Data/Main/Curation/biblio.hfd -nk 008984 | SxmlIndent | more
Pour mettre un lien sur cette page dans le réseau Wicri
{{Explor lien
|wiki= Wicri/Santé
|area= EdenteV2
|flux= Main
|étape= Curation
|type= RBID
|clé= ISTEX:0BD040A7105D9C6891767264E7FE940E09ED881A
|texte= Implant versus tooth‐implant supported prostheses in the posterior maxilla: a 2‐year report
}}
| This area was generated with Dilib version V0.6.32. |  |