Developing congruent children's services to improve child well‐being
Identifieur interne : 005C15 ( Main/Curation ); précédent : 005C14; suivant : 005C16Developing congruent children's services to improve child well‐being
Auteurs : Nick Axford [Royaume-Uni]Source :
- Child & Family Social Work [ 1356-7500 ] ; 2009-02.
Descripteurs français
- Wicri :
English descriptors
- KwdEn :
- Author journal compilation, Axford, Best interests, Blackwell, Blackwell publishing, Child maltreatment, Child poverty, Children society, Combat exclusion, Congruent, Congruent pattern, Congruent services, Developmental impairment, Different concepts, Different discourses, Different emphases, Different service styles, Different types, Empirical manifestations, Exclusion, Family life, Family support, Greater congruence, Inclusion, International journal, Labour market, Lower hood barn, Moral rights, Objective circumstances, Oxford university press, Policy press, Potential contradictions, Practitioner, Previous paper, Research unit, Rights perspective, Rightsorientated approach, Same child, Same time, Service style, Service styles, Social care, Social exclusion, Social policy, Social services, Social ties, Social work, State support, Such contradictions, Systematic review, Third part, Useful lenses, Welfare state, Wider community, Young people.
- Teeft :
- Author journal compilation, Axford, Best interests, Blackwell, Blackwell publishing, Child maltreatment, Child poverty, Children society, Combat exclusion, Congruent, Congruent pattern, Congruent services, Developmental impairment, Different concepts, Different discourses, Different emphases, Different service styles, Different types, Empirical manifestations, Exclusion, Family life, Family support, Greater congruence, Inclusion, International journal, Labour market, Lower hood barn, Moral rights, Objective circumstances, Oxford university press, Policy press, Potential contradictions, Practitioner, Previous paper, Research unit, Rights perspective, Rightsorientated approach, Same child, Same time, Service style, Service styles, Social care, Social exclusion, Social policy, Social services, Social ties, Social work, State support, Such contradictions, Systematic review, Third part, Useful lenses, Welfare state, Wider community, Young people.
Abstract
This paper explores whether different concepts of child well‐being call for different ‘service styles’ and, if so, whether these styles can dovetail together to form a congruent pattern of children's services. The first part draws on the distinguishing features of five approaches to conceptualizing well‐being – need, rights, poverty, quality of life and social exclusion – and their empirical manifestations (‘conditions’) to identify different emphases or ‘styles’ in service provision. The second, more discursive part of the paper explores potential contradictions between these service styles, for example, between needs‐led and rights‐based approaches or between policies to tackle poverty and combat social exclusion. The third part examines whether and how such contradictions can be minimized to achieve greater congruence and discusses the need to consider the orientation of children's services in respect of interpretations of child well‐being.
Url:
DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2206.2008.00579.x
Links toward previous steps (curation, corpus...)
- to stream Istex, to step Corpus: Pour aller vers cette notice dans l'étape Curation :003656
- to stream Istex, to step Curation: Pour aller vers cette notice dans l'étape Curation :003656
- to stream Istex, to step Checkpoint: Pour aller vers cette notice dans l'étape Curation :002292
- to stream Main, to step Merge: Pour aller vers cette notice dans l'étape Curation :005C79
Links to Exploration step
ISTEX:6E35C449482A153A857809D67B47731A5E488331Le document en format XML
<record><TEI wicri:istexFullTextTei="biblStruct"><teiHeader><fileDesc><titleStmt><title xml:lang="en">Developing congruent children's services to improve child well‐being</title>
<author><name sortKey="Axford, Nick" sort="Axford, Nick" uniqKey="Axford N" first="Nick" last="Axford">Nick Axford</name>
</author>
</titleStmt>
<publicationStmt><idno type="wicri:source">ISTEX</idno>
<idno type="RBID">ISTEX:6E35C449482A153A857809D67B47731A5E488331</idno>
<date when="2009" year="2009">2009</date>
<idno type="doi">10.1111/j.1365-2206.2008.00579.x</idno>
<idno type="url">https://api.istex.fr/document/6E35C449482A153A857809D67B47731A5E488331/fulltext/pdf</idno>
<idno type="wicri:Area/Istex/Corpus">003656</idno>
<idno type="wicri:explorRef" wicri:stream="Istex" wicri:step="Corpus" wicri:corpus="ISTEX">003656</idno>
<idno type="wicri:Area/Istex/Curation">003656</idno>
<idno type="wicri:Area/Istex/Checkpoint">002292</idno>
<idno type="wicri:explorRef" wicri:stream="Istex" wicri:step="Checkpoint">002292</idno>
<idno type="wicri:doubleKey">1356-7500:2009:Axford N:developing:congruent:children</idno>
<idno type="wicri:Area/Main/Merge">005C79</idno>
<idno type="wicri:Area/Main/Curation">005C15</idno>
</publicationStmt>
<sourceDesc><biblStruct><analytic><title level="a" type="main">Developing congruent children's services to improve child well‐being</title>
<author><name sortKey="Axford, Nick" sort="Axford, Nick" uniqKey="Axford N" first="Nick" last="Axford">Nick Axford</name>
<affiliation wicri:level="1"><country xml:lang="fr">Royaume-Uni</country>
<wicri:regionArea>Researcher, Dartington Social Research Unit, Lower Hood Barn, Dartington</wicri:regionArea>
<wicri:noRegion>Dartington</wicri:noRegion>
</affiliation>
</author>
</analytic>
<monogr></monogr>
<series><title level="j" type="main">Child & Family Social Work</title>
<title level="j" type="alt">CHILD FAMILY SOCIAL WORK</title>
<idno type="ISSN">1356-7500</idno>
<idno type="eISSN">1365-2206</idno>
<imprint><biblScope unit="vol">14</biblScope>
<biblScope unit="issue">1</biblScope>
<biblScope unit="page" from="35">35</biblScope>
<biblScope unit="page" to="44">44</biblScope>
<biblScope unit="page-count">10</biblScope>
<publisher>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</publisher>
<pubPlace>Oxford, UK</pubPlace>
<date type="published" when="2009-02">2009-02</date>
</imprint>
<idno type="ISSN">1356-7500</idno>
</series>
</biblStruct>
</sourceDesc>
<seriesStmt><idno type="ISSN">1356-7500</idno>
</seriesStmt>
</fileDesc>
<profileDesc><textClass><keywords scheme="KwdEn" xml:lang="en"><term>Author journal compilation</term>
<term>Axford</term>
<term>Best interests</term>
<term>Blackwell</term>
<term>Blackwell publishing</term>
<term>Child maltreatment</term>
<term>Child poverty</term>
<term>Children society</term>
<term>Combat exclusion</term>
<term>Congruent</term>
<term>Congruent pattern</term>
<term>Congruent services</term>
<term>Developmental impairment</term>
<term>Different concepts</term>
<term>Different discourses</term>
<term>Different emphases</term>
<term>Different service styles</term>
<term>Different types</term>
<term>Empirical manifestations</term>
<term>Exclusion</term>
<term>Family life</term>
<term>Family support</term>
<term>Greater congruence</term>
<term>Inclusion</term>
<term>International journal</term>
<term>Labour market</term>
<term>Lower hood barn</term>
<term>Moral rights</term>
<term>Objective circumstances</term>
<term>Oxford university press</term>
<term>Policy press</term>
<term>Potential contradictions</term>
<term>Practitioner</term>
<term>Previous paper</term>
<term>Research unit</term>
<term>Rights perspective</term>
<term>Rightsorientated approach</term>
<term>Same child</term>
<term>Same time</term>
<term>Service style</term>
<term>Service styles</term>
<term>Social care</term>
<term>Social exclusion</term>
<term>Social policy</term>
<term>Social services</term>
<term>Social ties</term>
<term>Social work</term>
<term>State support</term>
<term>Such contradictions</term>
<term>Systematic review</term>
<term>Third part</term>
<term>Useful lenses</term>
<term>Welfare state</term>
<term>Wider community</term>
<term>Young people</term>
</keywords>
<keywords scheme="Teeft" xml:lang="en"><term>Author journal compilation</term>
<term>Axford</term>
<term>Best interests</term>
<term>Blackwell</term>
<term>Blackwell publishing</term>
<term>Child maltreatment</term>
<term>Child poverty</term>
<term>Children society</term>
<term>Combat exclusion</term>
<term>Congruent</term>
<term>Congruent pattern</term>
<term>Congruent services</term>
<term>Developmental impairment</term>
<term>Different concepts</term>
<term>Different discourses</term>
<term>Different emphases</term>
<term>Different service styles</term>
<term>Different types</term>
<term>Empirical manifestations</term>
<term>Exclusion</term>
<term>Family life</term>
<term>Family support</term>
<term>Greater congruence</term>
<term>Inclusion</term>
<term>International journal</term>
<term>Labour market</term>
<term>Lower hood barn</term>
<term>Moral rights</term>
<term>Objective circumstances</term>
<term>Oxford university press</term>
<term>Policy press</term>
<term>Potential contradictions</term>
<term>Practitioner</term>
<term>Previous paper</term>
<term>Research unit</term>
<term>Rights perspective</term>
<term>Rightsorientated approach</term>
<term>Same child</term>
<term>Same time</term>
<term>Service style</term>
<term>Service styles</term>
<term>Social care</term>
<term>Social exclusion</term>
<term>Social policy</term>
<term>Social services</term>
<term>Social ties</term>
<term>Social work</term>
<term>State support</term>
<term>Such contradictions</term>
<term>Systematic review</term>
<term>Third part</term>
<term>Useful lenses</term>
<term>Welfare state</term>
<term>Wider community</term>
<term>Young people</term>
</keywords>
<keywords scheme="Wicri" type="topic" xml:lang="fr"><term>Marché du travail</term>
<term>Politique sociale</term>
<term>Service social</term>
<term>Travail social</term>
</keywords>
</textClass>
</profileDesc>
</teiHeader>
<front><div type="abstract" xml:lang="en">This paper explores whether different concepts of child well‐being call for different ‘service styles’ and, if so, whether these styles can dovetail together to form a congruent pattern of children's services. The first part draws on the distinguishing features of five approaches to conceptualizing well‐being – need, rights, poverty, quality of life and social exclusion – and their empirical manifestations (‘conditions’) to identify different emphases or ‘styles’ in service provision. The second, more discursive part of the paper explores potential contradictions between these service styles, for example, between needs‐led and rights‐based approaches or between policies to tackle poverty and combat social exclusion. The third part examines whether and how such contradictions can be minimized to achieve greater congruence and discusses the need to consider the orientation of children's services in respect of interpretations of child well‐being.</div>
</front>
</TEI>
</record>
Pour manipuler ce document sous Unix (Dilib)
EXPLOR_STEP=$WICRI_ROOT/Wicri/Santé/explor/EdenteV2/Data/Main/Curation
HfdSelect -h $EXPLOR_STEP/biblio.hfd -nk 005C15 | SxmlIndent | more
Ou
HfdSelect -h $EXPLOR_AREA/Data/Main/Curation/biblio.hfd -nk 005C15 | SxmlIndent | more
Pour mettre un lien sur cette page dans le réseau Wicri
{{Explor lien |wiki= Wicri/Santé |area= EdenteV2 |flux= Main |étape= Curation |type= RBID |clé= ISTEX:6E35C449482A153A857809D67B47731A5E488331 |texte= Developing congruent children's services to improve child well‐being }}
![]() | This area was generated with Dilib version V0.6.32. | ![]() |