The Campaign That Changed Everything and Still Did Not Matter? The Liberal Democrat Campaign and Performance
Identifieur interne : 004E77 ( Main/Curation ); précédent : 004E76; suivant : 004E78The Campaign That Changed Everything and Still Did Not Matter? The Liberal Democrat Campaign and Performance
Auteurs : David Cutts [Royaume-Uni] ; Edward Fieldhouse [Royaume-Uni] ; Andrew Russell [Royaume-Uni]Source :
- Parliamentary Affairs [ 0031-2290 ] ; 2010-10.
Abstract
This contribution examines the Liberal Democrat campaign and their subsequent performance in the 2010 General Election. Despite what appeared to be a ground-breaking campaign, the Liberal Democrat performance in the 2010 election was—as Clegg acknowledged—disappointing for the party. Here we argue that the story of the 2010 Liberal Democrat election was the remarkable similarity with 2005, with even the geographical variations in support part of a long tradition of local upsets reflecting local issues, campaigns and personalities. Moreover, we suggest that the Liberal Democrats failure to break the mould of British politics reflected the age-old problem of electoral credibility. Put simply, despite the cataclysmic events of the election campaign, the surge subsided because too many people either did not want a Liberal Democrat government or did not believe a Liberal Democrat could win the national or local constituency contest.
Url:
DOI: 10.1093/pa/gsq025
Links toward previous steps (curation, corpus...)
- to stream Istex, to step Corpus: Pour aller vers cette notice dans l'étape Curation :001F05
- to stream Istex, to step Curation: Pour aller vers cette notice dans l'étape Curation :001F05
- to stream Istex, to step Checkpoint: Pour aller vers cette notice dans l'étape Curation :001979
- to stream Main, to step Merge: Pour aller vers cette notice dans l'étape Curation :004F18
Links to Exploration step
ISTEX:3F38CD9B5D9785A90080B2B8842F96A5CB6C20F2Le document en format XML
<record><TEI wicri:istexFullTextTei="biblStruct"><teiHeader><fileDesc><titleStmt><title>The Campaign That Changed Everything and Still Did Not Matter? The Liberal Democrat Campaign and Performance</title>
<author wicri:is="90%"><name sortKey="Cutts, David" sort="Cutts, David" uniqKey="Cutts D" first="David" last="Cutts">David Cutts</name>
</author>
<author wicri:is="90%"><name sortKey="Fieldhouse, Edward" sort="Fieldhouse, Edward" uniqKey="Fieldhouse E" first="Edward" last="Fieldhouse">Edward Fieldhouse</name>
</author>
<author wicri:is="90%"><name sortKey="Russell, Andrew" sort="Russell, Andrew" uniqKey="Russell A" first="Andrew" last="Russell">Andrew Russell</name>
</author>
</titleStmt>
<publicationStmt><idno type="wicri:source">ISTEX</idno>
<idno type="RBID">ISTEX:3F38CD9B5D9785A90080B2B8842F96A5CB6C20F2</idno>
<date when="2010" year="2010">2010</date>
<idno type="doi">10.1093/pa/gsq025</idno>
<idno type="url">https://api.istex.fr/document/3F38CD9B5D9785A90080B2B8842F96A5CB6C20F2/fulltext/pdf</idno>
<idno type="wicri:Area/Istex/Corpus">001F05</idno>
<idno type="wicri:explorRef" wicri:stream="Istex" wicri:step="Corpus" wicri:corpus="ISTEX">001F05</idno>
<idno type="wicri:Area/Istex/Curation">001F05</idno>
<idno type="wicri:Area/Istex/Checkpoint">001979</idno>
<idno type="wicri:explorRef" wicri:stream="Istex" wicri:step="Checkpoint">001979</idno>
<idno type="wicri:doubleKey">0031-2290:2010:Cutts D:the:campaign:that</idno>
<idno type="wicri:Area/Main/Merge">004F18</idno>
<idno type="wicri:Area/Main/Curation">004E77</idno>
</publicationStmt>
<sourceDesc><biblStruct><analytic><title level="a">The Campaign That Changed Everything and Still Did Not Matter? The Liberal Democrat Campaign and Performance</title>
<author wicri:is="90%"><name sortKey="Cutts, David" sort="Cutts, David" uniqKey="Cutts D" first="David" last="Cutts">David Cutts</name>
<affiliation wicri:level="4"><country>Royaume-Uni</country>
<placeName><settlement type="city">Manchester</settlement>
<region type="nation">Angleterre</region>
<region nuts="2" type="region">Grand Manchester</region>
</placeName>
<orgName type="university">Université de Manchester</orgName>
</affiliation>
<affiliation wicri:level="1"><country wicri:rule="url">Royaume-Uni</country>
</affiliation>
</author>
<author wicri:is="90%"><name sortKey="Fieldhouse, Edward" sort="Fieldhouse, Edward" uniqKey="Fieldhouse E" first="Edward" last="Fieldhouse">Edward Fieldhouse</name>
<affiliation wicri:level="4"><country>Royaume-Uni</country>
<placeName><settlement type="city">Manchester</settlement>
<region type="nation">Angleterre</region>
<region nuts="2" type="region">Grand Manchester</region>
</placeName>
<orgName type="university">Université de Manchester</orgName>
</affiliation>
<affiliation wicri:level="1"><country wicri:rule="url">Royaume-Uni</country>
</affiliation>
</author>
<author wicri:is="90%"><name sortKey="Russell, Andrew" sort="Russell, Andrew" uniqKey="Russell A" first="Andrew" last="Russell">Andrew Russell</name>
<affiliation wicri:level="4"><country>Royaume-Uni</country>
<placeName><settlement type="city">Manchester</settlement>
<region type="nation">Angleterre</region>
<region nuts="2" type="region">Grand Manchester</region>
</placeName>
<orgName type="university">Université de Manchester</orgName>
</affiliation>
<affiliation wicri:level="1"><country wicri:rule="url">Royaume-Uni</country>
</affiliation>
</author>
</analytic>
<monogr></monogr>
<series><title level="j">Parliamentary Affairs</title>
<idno type="ISSN">0031-2290</idno>
<idno type="eISSN">1460-2482</idno>
<imprint><publisher>Oxford University Press</publisher>
<date type="published" when="2010-10">2010-10</date>
<biblScope unit="volume">63</biblScope>
<biblScope unit="issue">4</biblScope>
<biblScope unit="page" from="689">689</biblScope>
<biblScope unit="page" to="707">707</biblScope>
</imprint>
<idno type="ISSN">0031-2290</idno>
</series>
</biblStruct>
</sourceDesc>
<seriesStmt><idno type="ISSN">0031-2290</idno>
</seriesStmt>
</fileDesc>
<profileDesc><textClass></textClass>
</profileDesc>
</teiHeader>
<front><div type="abstract">This contribution examines the Liberal Democrat campaign and their subsequent performance in the 2010 General Election. Despite what appeared to be a ground-breaking campaign, the Liberal Democrat performance in the 2010 election was—as Clegg acknowledged—disappointing for the party. Here we argue that the story of the 2010 Liberal Democrat election was the remarkable similarity with 2005, with even the geographical variations in support part of a long tradition of local upsets reflecting local issues, campaigns and personalities. Moreover, we suggest that the Liberal Democrats failure to break the mould of British politics reflected the age-old problem of electoral credibility. Put simply, despite the cataclysmic events of the election campaign, the surge subsided because too many people either did not want a Liberal Democrat government or did not believe a Liberal Democrat could win the national or local constituency contest.</div>
</front>
</TEI>
</record>
Pour manipuler ce document sous Unix (Dilib)
EXPLOR_STEP=$WICRI_ROOT/Wicri/Santé/explor/EdenteV2/Data/Main/Curation
HfdSelect -h $EXPLOR_STEP/biblio.hfd -nk 004E77 | SxmlIndent | more
Ou
HfdSelect -h $EXPLOR_AREA/Data/Main/Curation/biblio.hfd -nk 004E77 | SxmlIndent | more
Pour mettre un lien sur cette page dans le réseau Wicri
{{Explor lien |wiki= Wicri/Santé |area= EdenteV2 |flux= Main |étape= Curation |type= RBID |clé= ISTEX:3F38CD9B5D9785A90080B2B8842F96A5CB6C20F2 |texte= The Campaign That Changed Everything and Still Did Not Matter? The Liberal Democrat Campaign and Performance }}
![]() | This area was generated with Dilib version V0.6.32. | ![]() |