Strategies for restoration of single implants and use of cross‐pin retained restorations by Australian prosthodontists
Identifieur interne : 003719 ( Main/Curation ); précédent : 003718; suivant : 003720Strategies for restoration of single implants and use of cross‐pin retained restorations by Australian prosthodontists
Auteurs : Rj Sambrook ; Rb Judge ; Ma AbuzaarSource :
- Australian Dental Journal [ 0045-0421 ] ; 2012-12.
Descripteurs français
- Wicri :
- topic : Ciment.
English descriptors
- KwdEn :
- Abutment, Abutment screw, Abutment screw cavittm, Accessory screws, Aust dent, Australian prosthodontists, Biologic complications, Cement, Cement retention, Clinical practices, Complication rates, Crosspinned isrs, Current practices, Gasket, Gasket placement, Gasket type, Gasket types, Gingival recession, Implant, Implant restorations, Implantsupported prostheses, Inner surface, Isrs, Malodour, Maxillofac, Multiple answers, Multiple parts, Oral maxillofac implants, Oral maxillofac surg, Percentage response, Plaque control, Prosthesis, Prosthodontist, Queensland prosthodontists, Ranking cement, Regional differences, Restoration, Retention, Retention choice, Retention type, Retrievability, Screw retention, Seal crown, Single crowns, Single implant, Single implants, Single isrs, State level, Stula formation, Systematic review, Technical complications, Void space.
- Teeft :
- Abutment, Abutment screw, Abutment screw cavittm, Accessory screws, Aust dent, Australian prosthodontists, Biologic complications, Cement, Cement retention, Clinical practices, Complication rates, Crosspinned isrs, Current practices, Gasket, Gasket placement, Gasket type, Gasket types, Gingival recession, Implant, Implant restorations, Implantsupported prostheses, Inner surface, Isrs, Malodour, Maxillofac, Multiple answers, Multiple parts, Oral maxillofac implants, Oral maxillofac surg, Percentage response, Plaque control, Prosthesis, Prosthodontist, Queensland prosthodontists, Ranking cement, Regional differences, Restoration, Retention, Retention choice, Retention type, Retrievability, Screw retention, Seal crown, Single crowns, Single implant, Single implants, Single isrs, State level, Stula formation, Systematic review, Technical complications, Void space.
Abstract
Background: Implant supported restorations (ISRs) for the single implant may be cement retained or screw retained. Limited scientific evidence exists to support the superiority of a retention type for either implant or prosthetic success. The aim of this study was to assess preferences of Australian prosthodontists when restoring single implants. In particular, clinical practices for cross‐pin retained implant supported restorations for a single implant were investigated.
Url:
DOI: 10.1111/j.1834-7819.2012.01731.x
Links toward previous steps (curation, corpus...)
- to stream Istex, to step Corpus: Pour aller vers cette notice dans l'étape Curation :003161
- to stream Istex, to step Curation: Pour aller vers cette notice dans l'étape Curation :003161
- to stream Istex, to step Checkpoint: Pour aller vers cette notice dans l'étape Curation :000B89
- to stream Main, to step Merge: Pour aller vers cette notice dans l'étape Curation :003736
Links to Exploration step
ISTEX:649D11E1702FF62F3AEA2E9A94600A231CEE64F3Curation
No country items
Rj Sambrook<affiliation><wicri:noCountry code="subField">Victoria.</wicri:noCountry>
</affiliation>
<affiliation><wicri:noCountry code="subField">Victoria.</wicri:noCountry>
</affiliation>
<affiliation><wicri:noCountry code="subField">Victoria.</wicri:noCountry>
</affiliation>
Le document en format XML
<record><TEI wicri:istexFullTextTei="biblStruct"><teiHeader><fileDesc><titleStmt><title xml:lang="en">Strategies for restoration of single implants and use of cross‐pin retained restorations by Australian prosthodontists</title>
<author><name sortKey="Sambrook, Rj" sort="Sambrook, Rj" uniqKey="Sambrook R" first="Rj" last="Sambrook">Rj Sambrook</name>
</author>
<author><name sortKey="Judge, Rb" sort="Judge, Rb" uniqKey="Judge R" first="Rb" last="Judge">Rb Judge</name>
</author>
<author><name sortKey="Abuzaar, Ma" sort="Abuzaar, Ma" uniqKey="Abuzaar M" first="Ma" last="Abuzaar">Ma Abuzaar</name>
</author>
</titleStmt>
<publicationStmt><idno type="wicri:source">ISTEX</idno>
<idno type="RBID">ISTEX:649D11E1702FF62F3AEA2E9A94600A231CEE64F3</idno>
<date when="2012" year="2012">2012</date>
<idno type="doi">10.1111/j.1834-7819.2012.01731.x</idno>
<idno type="url">https://api.istex.fr/document/649D11E1702FF62F3AEA2E9A94600A231CEE64F3/fulltext/pdf</idno>
<idno type="wicri:Area/Istex/Corpus">003161</idno>
<idno type="wicri:explorRef" wicri:stream="Istex" wicri:step="Corpus" wicri:corpus="ISTEX">003161</idno>
<idno type="wicri:Area/Istex/Curation">003161</idno>
<idno type="wicri:Area/Istex/Checkpoint">000B89</idno>
<idno type="wicri:explorRef" wicri:stream="Istex" wicri:step="Checkpoint">000B89</idno>
<idno type="wicri:doubleKey">0045-0421:2012:Sambrook R:strategies:for:restoration</idno>
<idno type="wicri:Area/Main/Merge">003736</idno>
<idno type="wicri:Area/Main/Curation">003719</idno>
</publicationStmt>
<sourceDesc><biblStruct><analytic><title level="a" type="main">Strategies for restoration of single implants and use of cross‐pin retained restorations by Australian prosthodontists</title>
<author><name sortKey="Sambrook, Rj" sort="Sambrook, Rj" uniqKey="Sambrook R" first="Rj" last="Sambrook">Rj Sambrook</name>
<affiliation><wicri:noCountry code="subField">Victoria.</wicri:noCountry>
</affiliation>
</author>
<author><name sortKey="Judge, Rb" sort="Judge, Rb" uniqKey="Judge R" first="Rb" last="Judge">Rb Judge</name>
<affiliation><wicri:noCountry code="subField">Victoria.</wicri:noCountry>
</affiliation>
</author>
<author><name sortKey="Abuzaar, Ma" sort="Abuzaar, Ma" uniqKey="Abuzaar M" first="Ma" last="Abuzaar">Ma Abuzaar</name>
<affiliation><wicri:noCountry code="subField">Victoria.</wicri:noCountry>
</affiliation>
</author>
</analytic>
<monogr></monogr>
<series><title level="j" type="main">Australian Dental Journal</title>
<title level="j" type="alt">AUSTRALIAN DENTAL JOURNAL</title>
<idno type="ISSN">0045-0421</idno>
<idno type="eISSN">1834-7819</idno>
<imprint><biblScope unit="vol">57</biblScope>
<biblScope unit="issue">4</biblScope>
<biblScope unit="page" from="409">409</biblScope>
<biblScope unit="page" to="414">414</biblScope>
<biblScope unit="page-count">6</biblScope>
<publisher>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</publisher>
<pubPlace>Oxford, UK</pubPlace>
<date type="published" when="2012-12">2012-12</date>
</imprint>
<idno type="ISSN">0045-0421</idno>
</series>
</biblStruct>
</sourceDesc>
<seriesStmt><idno type="ISSN">0045-0421</idno>
</seriesStmt>
</fileDesc>
<profileDesc><textClass><keywords scheme="KwdEn" xml:lang="en"><term>Abutment</term>
<term>Abutment screw</term>
<term>Abutment screw cavittm</term>
<term>Accessory screws</term>
<term>Aust dent</term>
<term>Australian prosthodontists</term>
<term>Biologic complications</term>
<term>Cement</term>
<term>Cement retention</term>
<term>Clinical practices</term>
<term>Complication rates</term>
<term>Crosspinned isrs</term>
<term>Current practices</term>
<term>Gasket</term>
<term>Gasket placement</term>
<term>Gasket type</term>
<term>Gasket types</term>
<term>Gingival recession</term>
<term>Implant</term>
<term>Implant restorations</term>
<term>Implantsupported prostheses</term>
<term>Inner surface</term>
<term>Isrs</term>
<term>Malodour</term>
<term>Maxillofac</term>
<term>Multiple answers</term>
<term>Multiple parts</term>
<term>Oral maxillofac implants</term>
<term>Oral maxillofac surg</term>
<term>Percentage response</term>
<term>Plaque control</term>
<term>Prosthesis</term>
<term>Prosthodontist</term>
<term>Queensland prosthodontists</term>
<term>Ranking cement</term>
<term>Regional differences</term>
<term>Restoration</term>
<term>Retention</term>
<term>Retention choice</term>
<term>Retention type</term>
<term>Retrievability</term>
<term>Screw retention</term>
<term>Seal crown</term>
<term>Single crowns</term>
<term>Single implant</term>
<term>Single implants</term>
<term>Single isrs</term>
<term>State level</term>
<term>Stula formation</term>
<term>Systematic review</term>
<term>Technical complications</term>
<term>Void space</term>
</keywords>
<keywords scheme="Teeft" xml:lang="en"><term>Abutment</term>
<term>Abutment screw</term>
<term>Abutment screw cavittm</term>
<term>Accessory screws</term>
<term>Aust dent</term>
<term>Australian prosthodontists</term>
<term>Biologic complications</term>
<term>Cement</term>
<term>Cement retention</term>
<term>Clinical practices</term>
<term>Complication rates</term>
<term>Crosspinned isrs</term>
<term>Current practices</term>
<term>Gasket</term>
<term>Gasket placement</term>
<term>Gasket type</term>
<term>Gasket types</term>
<term>Gingival recession</term>
<term>Implant</term>
<term>Implant restorations</term>
<term>Implantsupported prostheses</term>
<term>Inner surface</term>
<term>Isrs</term>
<term>Malodour</term>
<term>Maxillofac</term>
<term>Multiple answers</term>
<term>Multiple parts</term>
<term>Oral maxillofac implants</term>
<term>Oral maxillofac surg</term>
<term>Percentage response</term>
<term>Plaque control</term>
<term>Prosthesis</term>
<term>Prosthodontist</term>
<term>Queensland prosthodontists</term>
<term>Ranking cement</term>
<term>Regional differences</term>
<term>Restoration</term>
<term>Retention</term>
<term>Retention choice</term>
<term>Retention type</term>
<term>Retrievability</term>
<term>Screw retention</term>
<term>Seal crown</term>
<term>Single crowns</term>
<term>Single implant</term>
<term>Single implants</term>
<term>Single isrs</term>
<term>State level</term>
<term>Stula formation</term>
<term>Systematic review</term>
<term>Technical complications</term>
<term>Void space</term>
</keywords>
<keywords scheme="Wicri" type="topic" xml:lang="fr"><term>Ciment</term>
</keywords>
</textClass>
</profileDesc>
</teiHeader>
<front><div type="abstract">Background: Implant supported restorations (ISRs) for the single implant may be cement retained or screw retained. Limited scientific evidence exists to support the superiority of a retention type for either implant or prosthetic success. The aim of this study was to assess preferences of Australian prosthodontists when restoring single implants. In particular, clinical practices for cross‐pin retained implant supported restorations for a single implant were investigated.</div>
</front>
</TEI>
</record>
Pour manipuler ce document sous Unix (Dilib)
EXPLOR_STEP=$WICRI_ROOT/Wicri/Santé/explor/EdenteV2/Data/Main/Curation
HfdSelect -h $EXPLOR_STEP/biblio.hfd -nk 003719 | SxmlIndent | more
Ou
HfdSelect -h $EXPLOR_AREA/Data/Main/Curation/biblio.hfd -nk 003719 | SxmlIndent | more
Pour mettre un lien sur cette page dans le réseau Wicri
{{Explor lien |wiki= Wicri/Santé |area= EdenteV2 |flux= Main |étape= Curation |type= RBID |clé= ISTEX:649D11E1702FF62F3AEA2E9A94600A231CEE64F3 |texte= Strategies for restoration of single implants and use of cross‐pin retained restorations by Australian prosthodontists }}
![]() | This area was generated with Dilib version V0.6.32. | ![]() |