Serveur d'exploration sur le patient édenté

Attention, ce site est en cours de développement !
Attention, site généré par des moyens informatiques à partir de corpus bruts.
Les informations ne sont donc pas validées.

Strategies for restoration of single implants and use of cross‐pin retained restorations by Australian prosthodontists

Identifieur interne : 003719 ( Main/Curation ); précédent : 003718; suivant : 003720

Strategies for restoration of single implants and use of cross‐pin retained restorations by Australian prosthodontists

Auteurs : Rj Sambrook ; Rb Judge ; Ma Abuzaar

Source :

RBID : ISTEX:649D11E1702FF62F3AEA2E9A94600A231CEE64F3

Descripteurs français

English descriptors

Abstract

Background:  Implant supported restorations (ISRs) for the single implant may be cement retained or screw retained. Limited scientific evidence exists to support the superiority of a retention type for either implant or prosthetic success. The aim of this study was to assess preferences of Australian prosthodontists when restoring single implants. In particular, clinical practices for cross‐pin retained implant supported restorations for a single implant were investigated.

Url:
DOI: 10.1111/j.1834-7819.2012.01731.x

Links toward previous steps (curation, corpus...)


Links to Exploration step

ISTEX:649D11E1702FF62F3AEA2E9A94600A231CEE64F3

Curation

No country items

Rj Sambrook
<affiliation>
<wicri:noCountry code="subField">Victoria.</wicri:noCountry>
</affiliation>
Rb Judge
<affiliation>
<wicri:noCountry code="subField">Victoria.</wicri:noCountry>
</affiliation>
Ma Abuzaar
<affiliation>
<wicri:noCountry code="subField">Victoria.</wicri:noCountry>
</affiliation>

Le document en format XML

<record>
<TEI wicri:istexFullTextTei="biblStruct">
<teiHeader>
<fileDesc>
<titleStmt>
<title xml:lang="en">Strategies for restoration of single implants and use of cross‐pin retained restorations by Australian prosthodontists</title>
<author>
<name sortKey="Sambrook, Rj" sort="Sambrook, Rj" uniqKey="Sambrook R" first="Rj" last="Sambrook">Rj Sambrook</name>
</author>
<author>
<name sortKey="Judge, Rb" sort="Judge, Rb" uniqKey="Judge R" first="Rb" last="Judge">Rb Judge</name>
</author>
<author>
<name sortKey="Abuzaar, Ma" sort="Abuzaar, Ma" uniqKey="Abuzaar M" first="Ma" last="Abuzaar">Ma Abuzaar</name>
</author>
</titleStmt>
<publicationStmt>
<idno type="wicri:source">ISTEX</idno>
<idno type="RBID">ISTEX:649D11E1702FF62F3AEA2E9A94600A231CEE64F3</idno>
<date when="2012" year="2012">2012</date>
<idno type="doi">10.1111/j.1834-7819.2012.01731.x</idno>
<idno type="url">https://api.istex.fr/document/649D11E1702FF62F3AEA2E9A94600A231CEE64F3/fulltext/pdf</idno>
<idno type="wicri:Area/Istex/Corpus">003161</idno>
<idno type="wicri:explorRef" wicri:stream="Istex" wicri:step="Corpus" wicri:corpus="ISTEX">003161</idno>
<idno type="wicri:Area/Istex/Curation">003161</idno>
<idno type="wicri:Area/Istex/Checkpoint">000B89</idno>
<idno type="wicri:explorRef" wicri:stream="Istex" wicri:step="Checkpoint">000B89</idno>
<idno type="wicri:doubleKey">0045-0421:2012:Sambrook R:strategies:for:restoration</idno>
<idno type="wicri:Area/Main/Merge">003736</idno>
<idno type="wicri:Area/Main/Curation">003719</idno>
</publicationStmt>
<sourceDesc>
<biblStruct>
<analytic>
<title level="a" type="main">Strategies for restoration of single implants and use of cross‐pin retained restorations by Australian prosthodontists</title>
<author>
<name sortKey="Sambrook, Rj" sort="Sambrook, Rj" uniqKey="Sambrook R" first="Rj" last="Sambrook">Rj Sambrook</name>
<affiliation>
<wicri:noCountry code="subField">Victoria.</wicri:noCountry>
</affiliation>
</author>
<author>
<name sortKey="Judge, Rb" sort="Judge, Rb" uniqKey="Judge R" first="Rb" last="Judge">Rb Judge</name>
<affiliation>
<wicri:noCountry code="subField">Victoria.</wicri:noCountry>
</affiliation>
</author>
<author>
<name sortKey="Abuzaar, Ma" sort="Abuzaar, Ma" uniqKey="Abuzaar M" first="Ma" last="Abuzaar">Ma Abuzaar</name>
<affiliation>
<wicri:noCountry code="subField">Victoria.</wicri:noCountry>
</affiliation>
</author>
</analytic>
<monogr></monogr>
<series>
<title level="j" type="main">Australian Dental Journal</title>
<title level="j" type="alt">AUSTRALIAN DENTAL JOURNAL</title>
<idno type="ISSN">0045-0421</idno>
<idno type="eISSN">1834-7819</idno>
<imprint>
<biblScope unit="vol">57</biblScope>
<biblScope unit="issue">4</biblScope>
<biblScope unit="page" from="409">409</biblScope>
<biblScope unit="page" to="414">414</biblScope>
<biblScope unit="page-count">6</biblScope>
<publisher>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</publisher>
<pubPlace>Oxford, UK</pubPlace>
<date type="published" when="2012-12">2012-12</date>
</imprint>
<idno type="ISSN">0045-0421</idno>
</series>
</biblStruct>
</sourceDesc>
<seriesStmt>
<idno type="ISSN">0045-0421</idno>
</seriesStmt>
</fileDesc>
<profileDesc>
<textClass>
<keywords scheme="KwdEn" xml:lang="en">
<term>Abutment</term>
<term>Abutment screw</term>
<term>Abutment screw cavittm</term>
<term>Accessory screws</term>
<term>Aust dent</term>
<term>Australian prosthodontists</term>
<term>Biologic complications</term>
<term>Cement</term>
<term>Cement retention</term>
<term>Clinical practices</term>
<term>Complication rates</term>
<term>Crosspinned isrs</term>
<term>Current practices</term>
<term>Gasket</term>
<term>Gasket placement</term>
<term>Gasket type</term>
<term>Gasket types</term>
<term>Gingival recession</term>
<term>Implant</term>
<term>Implant restorations</term>
<term>Implantsupported prostheses</term>
<term>Inner surface</term>
<term>Isrs</term>
<term>Malodour</term>
<term>Maxillofac</term>
<term>Multiple answers</term>
<term>Multiple parts</term>
<term>Oral maxillofac implants</term>
<term>Oral maxillofac surg</term>
<term>Percentage response</term>
<term>Plaque control</term>
<term>Prosthesis</term>
<term>Prosthodontist</term>
<term>Queensland prosthodontists</term>
<term>Ranking cement</term>
<term>Regional differences</term>
<term>Restoration</term>
<term>Retention</term>
<term>Retention choice</term>
<term>Retention type</term>
<term>Retrievability</term>
<term>Screw retention</term>
<term>Seal crown</term>
<term>Single crowns</term>
<term>Single implant</term>
<term>Single implants</term>
<term>Single isrs</term>
<term>State level</term>
<term>Stula formation</term>
<term>Systematic review</term>
<term>Technical complications</term>
<term>Void space</term>
</keywords>
<keywords scheme="Teeft" xml:lang="en">
<term>Abutment</term>
<term>Abutment screw</term>
<term>Abutment screw cavittm</term>
<term>Accessory screws</term>
<term>Aust dent</term>
<term>Australian prosthodontists</term>
<term>Biologic complications</term>
<term>Cement</term>
<term>Cement retention</term>
<term>Clinical practices</term>
<term>Complication rates</term>
<term>Crosspinned isrs</term>
<term>Current practices</term>
<term>Gasket</term>
<term>Gasket placement</term>
<term>Gasket type</term>
<term>Gasket types</term>
<term>Gingival recession</term>
<term>Implant</term>
<term>Implant restorations</term>
<term>Implantsupported prostheses</term>
<term>Inner surface</term>
<term>Isrs</term>
<term>Malodour</term>
<term>Maxillofac</term>
<term>Multiple answers</term>
<term>Multiple parts</term>
<term>Oral maxillofac implants</term>
<term>Oral maxillofac surg</term>
<term>Percentage response</term>
<term>Plaque control</term>
<term>Prosthesis</term>
<term>Prosthodontist</term>
<term>Queensland prosthodontists</term>
<term>Ranking cement</term>
<term>Regional differences</term>
<term>Restoration</term>
<term>Retention</term>
<term>Retention choice</term>
<term>Retention type</term>
<term>Retrievability</term>
<term>Screw retention</term>
<term>Seal crown</term>
<term>Single crowns</term>
<term>Single implant</term>
<term>Single implants</term>
<term>Single isrs</term>
<term>State level</term>
<term>Stula formation</term>
<term>Systematic review</term>
<term>Technical complications</term>
<term>Void space</term>
</keywords>
<keywords scheme="Wicri" type="topic" xml:lang="fr">
<term>Ciment</term>
</keywords>
</textClass>
</profileDesc>
</teiHeader>
<front>
<div type="abstract">Background:  Implant supported restorations (ISRs) for the single implant may be cement retained or screw retained. Limited scientific evidence exists to support the superiority of a retention type for either implant or prosthetic success. The aim of this study was to assess preferences of Australian prosthodontists when restoring single implants. In particular, clinical practices for cross‐pin retained implant supported restorations for a single implant were investigated.</div>
</front>
</TEI>
</record>

Pour manipuler ce document sous Unix (Dilib)

EXPLOR_STEP=$WICRI_ROOT/Wicri/Santé/explor/EdenteV2/Data/Main/Curation
HfdSelect -h $EXPLOR_STEP/biblio.hfd -nk 003719 | SxmlIndent | more

Ou

HfdSelect -h $EXPLOR_AREA/Data/Main/Curation/biblio.hfd -nk 003719 | SxmlIndent | more

Pour mettre un lien sur cette page dans le réseau Wicri

{{Explor lien
   |wiki=    Wicri/Santé
   |area=    EdenteV2
   |flux=    Main
   |étape=   Curation
   |type=    RBID
   |clé=     ISTEX:649D11E1702FF62F3AEA2E9A94600A231CEE64F3
   |texte=   Strategies for restoration of single implants and use of cross‐pin retained restorations by Australian prosthodontists
}}

Wicri

This area was generated with Dilib version V0.6.32.
Data generation: Thu Nov 30 15:26:48 2017. Site generation: Tue Mar 8 16:36:20 2022