Serveur d'exploration sur le patient édenté

Attention, ce site est en cours de développement !
Attention, site généré par des moyens informatiques à partir de corpus bruts.
Les informations ne sont donc pas validées.

Quality matters junior doctors perceptions

Identifieur interne : 005B94 ( Istex/Curation ); précédent : 005B93; suivant : 005B95

Quality matters junior doctors perceptions

Auteurs : Karin Newman [Royaume-Uni] ; Tanya Pyne [Royaume-Uni]

Source :

RBID : ISTEX:B8921181D76819C10F1EC26285097309FA88AC73

Descripteurs français

English descriptors

Abstract

Presents the results of an empirical study of junior doctors views on quality and clinical audit in health care. Claims that the requirement for annual efficiency gains and rising patient expectations, together with the realization that the costs of quality can consume between 30 and 50 per cent of costs, has brought quality in health care to the forefront. In this context, and because much of the medical care is delivered by junior doctors, studies their perceptions on dimensions of quality in health care, their knowledge of, and participation in, clinical audit and the obstacles to providing quality care. Makes a striking finding the low priority given to patient satisfaction a perspective which is out of alignment with the priorities of government policy, and the whole philosophy of quality in service. Asserts that the role, significance and outcome of clinical audit as a quality improvement tool is cast into doubt by these consultants of tomorrow.

Url:
DOI: 10.1108/02689239610127770

Links toward previous steps (curation, corpus...)


Links to Exploration step

ISTEX:B8921181D76819C10F1EC26285097309FA88AC73

Le document en format XML

<record>
<TEI wicri:istexFullTextTei="biblStruct">
<teiHeader>
<fileDesc>
<titleStmt>
<title xml:lang="en">Quality matters junior doctors perceptions</title>
<author>
<name sortKey="Newman, Karin" sort="Newman, Karin" uniqKey="Newman K" first="Karin" last="Newman">Karin Newman</name>
<affiliation wicri:level="1">
<mods:affiliation>Middlesex University Business School, London, UK</mods:affiliation>
<country xml:lang="fr">Royaume-Uni</country>
<wicri:regionArea>Middlesex University Business School, London</wicri:regionArea>
</affiliation>
</author>
<author>
<name sortKey="Pyne, Tanya" sort="Pyne, Tanya" uniqKey="Pyne T" first="Tanya" last="Pyne">Tanya Pyne</name>
<affiliation wicri:level="1">
<mods:affiliation>Middlesex University Business School, London, UK</mods:affiliation>
<country xml:lang="fr">Royaume-Uni</country>
<wicri:regionArea>Middlesex University Business School, London</wicri:regionArea>
</affiliation>
</author>
</titleStmt>
<publicationStmt>
<idno type="wicri:source">ISTEX</idno>
<idno type="RBID">ISTEX:B8921181D76819C10F1EC26285097309FA88AC73</idno>
<date when="1996" year="1996">1996</date>
<idno type="doi">10.1108/02689239610127770</idno>
<idno type="url">https://api.istex.fr/document/B8921181D76819C10F1EC26285097309FA88AC73/fulltext/pdf</idno>
<idno type="wicri:Area/Istex/Corpus">005B94</idno>
<idno type="wicri:explorRef" wicri:stream="Istex" wicri:step="Corpus" wicri:corpus="ISTEX">005B94</idno>
<idno type="wicri:Area/Istex/Curation">005B94</idno>
</publicationStmt>
<sourceDesc>
<biblStruct>
<analytic>
<title level="a" type="main" xml:lang="en">Quality matters junior doctors perceptions</title>
<author>
<name sortKey="Newman, Karin" sort="Newman, Karin" uniqKey="Newman K" first="Karin" last="Newman">Karin Newman</name>
<affiliation wicri:level="1">
<mods:affiliation>Middlesex University Business School, London, UK</mods:affiliation>
<country xml:lang="fr">Royaume-Uni</country>
<wicri:regionArea>Middlesex University Business School, London</wicri:regionArea>
</affiliation>
</author>
<author>
<name sortKey="Pyne, Tanya" sort="Pyne, Tanya" uniqKey="Pyne T" first="Tanya" last="Pyne">Tanya Pyne</name>
<affiliation wicri:level="1">
<mods:affiliation>Middlesex University Business School, London, UK</mods:affiliation>
<country xml:lang="fr">Royaume-Uni</country>
<wicri:regionArea>Middlesex University Business School, London</wicri:regionArea>
</affiliation>
</author>
</analytic>
<monogr></monogr>
<series>
<title level="j">Journal of Management in Medicine</title>
<idno type="ISSN">0268-9235</idno>
<imprint>
<publisher>MCB UP Ltd</publisher>
<date type="published" when="1996-08-01">1996-08-01</date>
<biblScope unit="volume">10</biblScope>
<biblScope unit="issue">4</biblScope>
<biblScope unit="page" from="12">12</biblScope>
<biblScope unit="page" to="23">23</biblScope>
</imprint>
<idno type="ISSN">0268-9235</idno>
</series>
</biblStruct>
</sourceDesc>
<seriesStmt>
<idno type="ISSN">0268-9235</idno>
</seriesStmt>
</fileDesc>
<profileDesc>
<textClass>
<keywords scheme="KwdEn" xml:lang="en">
<term>Audit</term>
<term>Audit meetings</term>
<term>Audit process</term>
<term>Audit processes</term>
<term>Cent figure</term>
<term>Cent note</term>
<term>Client satisfaction</term>
<term>Client values</term>
<term>Clinical audit</term>
<term>Clinical practice</term>
<term>Data collection</term>
<term>Effective treatments</term>
<term>Exploratory interviews</term>
<term>Fundamental importance</term>
<term>Health care</term>
<term>Health service quality</term>
<term>Health services</term>
<term>House officer</term>
<term>House officers</term>
<term>Junior doctors</term>
<term>Major obstacle</term>
<term>Many tasks</term>
<term>Medical audit</term>
<term>Medical care</term>
<term>Medical quality</term>
<term>Other comments</term>
<term>Patient care</term>
<term>Patient management</term>
<term>Patient satisfaction</term>
<term>Poor organization</term>
<term>Professional quality</term>
<term>Quality care</term>
<term>Quality health care</term>
<term>Quality matters</term>
<term>Quality methods</term>
<term>Quality patient care</term>
<term>Questionnaire respondent group</term>
<term>Questionnaire respondents</term>
<term>Same time</term>
<term>Senior registrar</term>
<term>Social science medicine</term>
<term>Technical competence</term>
<term>Workload</term>
</keywords>
<keywords scheme="Teeft" xml:lang="en">
<term>Audit</term>
<term>Audit meetings</term>
<term>Audit process</term>
<term>Audit processes</term>
<term>Cent figure</term>
<term>Cent note</term>
<term>Client satisfaction</term>
<term>Client values</term>
<term>Clinical audit</term>
<term>Clinical practice</term>
<term>Data collection</term>
<term>Effective treatments</term>
<term>Exploratory interviews</term>
<term>Fundamental importance</term>
<term>Health care</term>
<term>Health service quality</term>
<term>Health services</term>
<term>House officer</term>
<term>House officers</term>
<term>Junior doctors</term>
<term>Major obstacle</term>
<term>Many tasks</term>
<term>Medical audit</term>
<term>Medical care</term>
<term>Medical quality</term>
<term>Other comments</term>
<term>Patient care</term>
<term>Patient management</term>
<term>Patient satisfaction</term>
<term>Poor organization</term>
<term>Professional quality</term>
<term>Quality care</term>
<term>Quality health care</term>
<term>Quality matters</term>
<term>Quality methods</term>
<term>Quality patient care</term>
<term>Questionnaire respondent group</term>
<term>Questionnaire respondents</term>
<term>Same time</term>
<term>Senior registrar</term>
<term>Social science medicine</term>
<term>Technical competence</term>
<term>Workload</term>
</keywords>
<keywords scheme="Wicri" type="topic" xml:lang="fr">
<term>Audit</term>
<term>Collecte de données</term>
<term>Soins de santé</term>
</keywords>
</textClass>
<langUsage>
<language ident="en">en</language>
</langUsage>
</profileDesc>
</teiHeader>
<front>
<div type="abstract" xml:lang="en">Presents the results of an empirical study of junior doctors views on quality and clinical audit in health care. Claims that the requirement for annual efficiency gains and rising patient expectations, together with the realization that the costs of quality can consume between 30 and 50 per cent of costs, has brought quality in health care to the forefront. In this context, and because much of the medical care is delivered by junior doctors, studies their perceptions on dimensions of quality in health care, their knowledge of, and participation in, clinical audit and the obstacles to providing quality care. Makes a striking finding the low priority given to patient satisfaction a perspective which is out of alignment with the priorities of government policy, and the whole philosophy of quality in service. Asserts that the role, significance and outcome of clinical audit as a quality improvement tool is cast into doubt by these consultants of tomorrow.</div>
</front>
</TEI>
</record>

Pour manipuler ce document sous Unix (Dilib)

EXPLOR_STEP=$WICRI_ROOT/Wicri/Santé/explor/EdenteV2/Data/Istex/Curation
HfdSelect -h $EXPLOR_STEP/biblio.hfd -nk 005B94 | SxmlIndent | more

Ou

HfdSelect -h $EXPLOR_AREA/Data/Istex/Curation/biblio.hfd -nk 005B94 | SxmlIndent | more

Pour mettre un lien sur cette page dans le réseau Wicri

{{Explor lien
   |wiki=    Wicri/Santé
   |area=    EdenteV2
   |flux=    Istex
   |étape=   Curation
   |type=    RBID
   |clé=     ISTEX:B8921181D76819C10F1EC26285097309FA88AC73
   |texte=   Quality matters junior doctors perceptions
}}

Wicri

This area was generated with Dilib version V0.6.32.
Data generation: Thu Nov 30 15:26:48 2017. Site generation: Tue Mar 8 16:36:20 2022