Comparing Peer Reviews: The Universal Periodic Review of the UN Human Rights Council and the African Peer Review Mechanism

Comparing Peer Reviews: The Universal Periodic Review of the UN Human Rights Council and the African Peer Review Mechanism

Source :

• African and Asian Studies [ 1569-2094 ] ; 2013.

Descripteurs français

• Wicri :
  • geographic : Rwanda.
  • topic : Société civile, Gouvernement d'entreprise, Peine de mort, Développement économique, Gouvernance, Droits de l'homme, Politique internationale, Entreprise privée.

English descriptors

• KwdEn :
  • Addis ababa, African countries, African governance problems, African institute, African leaders, African mechanism, African ownership, African peer review mechanism, African states, African union, African unity, Aprm, Aprm member state, Aprm panel, Aprm process, Aprm reports, Arab emirates, Asian studies, Best practices, Broader range, Burkina faso, Cambridge university press, Civil society, Common initiative, Comparative assessment, Corporate governance, Council council, Country reports, Country review, Country review mission, Country reviews, Country visits, Critical assessment, Critical review, Death penalty, Democratic norms, Democratic quilt, Economic development, Expert answer, External african experts, Final adoption, Final country review report, First cycle, Foreign relations, Friedrich ebert stiftung, General assembly, General assembly resolution, General guidelines, Good governance, Governance, Governance areas, Governance system, Governance systems, Group session, Human rights, Human rights council, Human rights performance, Human rights performance november, Human rights situation, Interactive dialogue, International affairs, International instruments, International norms, International organizations, International service, June, Kumerian press, Land resource management, Latin america, Major stages, Many ideas, Many states, Many ways, Mcmahon, Member states, Method oecd, Monitoring implementation, National report, Nations office, Necessary reforms, Necessary steps, Nepad, Oecd, Other countries, Other states, Palgrave macmillan, Para, Peer review, Peer reviews, Plenary session, Political governance, Positive statements, Poverty reduction, Private sector, Recent years, Regional organizations, Relevant stakeholders, Review mechanism, Review mechanisms, Review process, Rights institutions, Rights situations, Rigorous examination, Rwanda, Second cycle, Stakeholder, State peer review, Steve grudz, Structural issues, Systemic issues, Troubles plague, Universal norms, Voluntary commitments.
• Teeft :
  • Addis ababa, African countries, African governance problems, African institute, African leaders, African mechanism, African ownership, African peer review mechanism, African states, African union, African unity, Aprm, Aprm member state, Aprm panel, Aprm process, Aprm reports, Arab emirates, Asian studies, Best practices, Broader range, Burkina faso, Cambridge university press, Civil society, Common initiative, Comparative assessment, Corporate governance, Council council, Country reports, Country review, Country review mission, Country reviews, Country visits, Critical assessment, Critical review, Death penalty, Democratic norms, Democratic quilt, Economic development, Expert answer, External african experts, Final adoption, Final country review report, First cycle, Foreign relations, Friedrich ebert stiftung, General assembly, General assembly resolution, General guidelines, Good governance, Governance, Governance areas, Governance system, Governance systems, Group session, Human rights, Human rights council, Human rights performance, Human rights performance november, Human rights situation, Interactive dialogue, International affairs, International instruments, International norms, International organizations, International service, June, Kumerian press, Land resource management, Latin america, Major stages, Many ideas, Many states, Many ways, Mcmahon, Member states, Method oecd, Monitoring implementation, National report, Nations office, Necessary reforms, Necessary steps, Nepad, Oecd, Other countries, Other states, Palgrave macmillan, Para, Peer review, Peer reviews, Plenary session, Political governance, Positive statements, Poverty reduction, Private sector, Recent years, Regional organizations, Relevant stakeholders, Review mechanism, Review mechanisms, Review process, Rights institutions, Rights situations, Rigorous examination, Rwanda, Second cycle, Stakeholder, State peer review, Steve grudz, Structural issues, Systemic issues, Troubles plague, Universal norms, Voluntary commitments.

Abstract

• https://api.istex.fr/document/A19FC4EB49F495CBE0DFDC538E6C6DA489996BA8/fulltext/pdf

Links toward previous steps (curation, corpus...)

• to stream Istex, to step Corpus: Pour aller vers cette notice dans l'étape Curation :005091

Links to Exploration step

Le document en format XML

Pour manipuler ce document sous Unix (Dilib)

EXPLOR_STEP=$WICRI_ROOT/Wicri/Santé/explor/EdenteV2/Data/Istex/Curation

HfdSelect -h $EXPLOR_STEP/biblio.hfd -nk 005091 | SxmlIndent | more

Ou

HfdSelect -h $EXPLOR_AREA/Data/Istex/Curation/biblio.hfd -nk 005091 | SxmlIndent | more

Pour mettre un lien sur cette page dans le réseau Wicri

{{Explor lien
   |wiki=    Wicri/Santé
   |area=    EdenteV2
   |flux=    Istex
   |étape=   Curation
   |type=    RBID
   |clé=     ISTEX:A19FC4EB49F495CBE0DFDC538E6C6DA489996BA8
   |texte=   Comparing Peer Reviews: The Universal Periodic Review of the UN Human Rights Council and the African Peer Review Mechanism
}}

This area was generated with Dilib version V0.6.32. Data generation: Thu Nov 30 15:26:48 2017. Site generation: Tue Mar 8 16:36:20 2022