Comparing Peer Reviews: The Universal Periodic Review of the UN Human Rights Council and the African Peer Review Mechanism
Identifieur interne : 005091 ( Istex/Curation ); précédent : 005090; suivant : 005092Comparing Peer Reviews: The Universal Periodic Review of the UN Human Rights Council and the African Peer Review Mechanism
Auteurs : Edward R. Mcmahon [États-Unis] ; Kojo Busia [États-Unis] ; Marta Ascherio [États-Unis]Source :
- African and Asian Studies [ 1569-2094 ] ; 2013.
Descripteurs français
- Wicri :
- geographic : Rwanda.
- topic : Société civile, Gouvernement d'entreprise, Peine de mort, Développement économique, Gouvernance, Droits de l'homme, Politique internationale, Entreprise privée.
English descriptors
- KwdEn :
- Addis ababa, African countries, African governance problems, African institute, African leaders, African mechanism, African ownership, African peer review mechanism, African states, African union, African unity, Aprm, Aprm member state, Aprm panel, Aprm process, Aprm reports, Arab emirates, Asian studies, Best practices, Broader range, Burkina faso, Cambridge university press, Civil society, Common initiative, Comparative assessment, Corporate governance, Council council, Country reports, Country review, Country review mission, Country reviews, Country visits, Critical assessment, Critical review, Death penalty, Democratic norms, Democratic quilt, Economic development, Expert answer, External african experts, Final adoption, Final country review report, First cycle, Foreign relations, Friedrich ebert stiftung, General assembly, General assembly resolution, General guidelines, Good governance, Governance, Governance areas, Governance system, Governance systems, Group session, Human rights, Human rights council, Human rights performance, Human rights performance november, Human rights situation, Interactive dialogue, International affairs, International instruments, International norms, International organizations, International service, June, Kumerian press, Land resource management, Latin america, Major stages, Many ideas, Many states, Many ways, Mcmahon, Member states, Method oecd, Monitoring implementation, National report, Nations office, Necessary reforms, Necessary steps, Nepad, Oecd, Other countries, Other states, Palgrave macmillan, Para, Peer review, Peer reviews, Plenary session, Political governance, Positive statements, Poverty reduction, Private sector, Recent years, Regional organizations, Relevant stakeholders, Review mechanism, Review mechanisms, Review process, Rights institutions, Rights situations, Rigorous examination, Rwanda, Second cycle, Stakeholder, State peer review, Steve grudz, Structural issues, Systemic issues, Troubles plague, Universal norms, Voluntary commitments.
- Teeft :
- Addis ababa, African countries, African governance problems, African institute, African leaders, African mechanism, African ownership, African peer review mechanism, African states, African union, African unity, Aprm, Aprm member state, Aprm panel, Aprm process, Aprm reports, Arab emirates, Asian studies, Best practices, Broader range, Burkina faso, Cambridge university press, Civil society, Common initiative, Comparative assessment, Corporate governance, Council council, Country reports, Country review, Country review mission, Country reviews, Country visits, Critical assessment, Critical review, Death penalty, Democratic norms, Democratic quilt, Economic development, Expert answer, External african experts, Final adoption, Final country review report, First cycle, Foreign relations, Friedrich ebert stiftung, General assembly, General assembly resolution, General guidelines, Good governance, Governance, Governance areas, Governance system, Governance systems, Group session, Human rights, Human rights council, Human rights performance, Human rights performance november, Human rights situation, Interactive dialogue, International affairs, International instruments, International norms, International organizations, International service, June, Kumerian press, Land resource management, Latin america, Major stages, Many ideas, Many states, Many ways, Mcmahon, Member states, Method oecd, Monitoring implementation, National report, Nations office, Necessary reforms, Necessary steps, Nepad, Oecd, Other countries, Other states, Palgrave macmillan, Para, Peer review, Peer reviews, Plenary session, Political governance, Positive statements, Poverty reduction, Private sector, Recent years, Regional organizations, Relevant stakeholders, Review mechanism, Review mechanisms, Review process, Rights institutions, Rights situations, Rigorous examination, Rwanda, Second cycle, Stakeholder, State peer review, Steve grudz, Structural issues, Systemic issues, Troubles plague, Universal norms, Voluntary commitments.
Abstract
Abstract The Universal Periodic Review Mechanism (UPR) of the UN Human Rights Council and the African Peer Review Mechanism (APRM) reflect a growing trend in international organizations to utilize peer review processes to assess and improve member state governance and human rights performance. The two mechanisms are distinct in many ways. For example, the APRM undertakes a more in-depth and rigorous examination of a broader range of issues. Both review mechanisms, however, also have similarities e.g. they emphasize follow-up and actions to be taken as a result of the reviews and are products of a consensus decision-making process based on voluntary engagement. They represent an evolutionary process by which international norms can be integrated in a national context.
Url:
DOI: 10.1163/15692108-12341265
Links toward previous steps (curation, corpus...)
- to stream Istex, to step Corpus: Pour aller vers cette notice dans l'étape Curation :005091
Links to Exploration step
ISTEX:A19FC4EB49F495CBE0DFDC538E6C6DA489996BA8Le document en format XML
<record><TEI wicri:istexFullTextTei="biblStruct"><teiHeader><fileDesc><titleStmt><title>Comparing Peer Reviews: The Universal Periodic Review of the UN Human Rights Council and the African Peer Review Mechanism</title>
<author><name sortKey="Mcmahon, Edward R" sort="Mcmahon, Edward R" uniqKey="Mcmahon E" first="Edward R." last="Mcmahon">Edward R. Mcmahon</name>
<affiliation wicri:level="1"><mods:affiliation>Department of Community Development and Applied Economics Department of Political Science, University of Vermont emcmahon@uvm.edu</mods:affiliation>
<country wicri:rule="url">États-Unis</country>
<wicri:regionArea>Department of Community Development and Applied Economics Department of Political Science</wicri:regionArea>
</affiliation>
<affiliation wicri:level="1"><mods:affiliation>E-mail: emcmahon@uvm.edu</mods:affiliation>
<country wicri:rule="url">États-Unis</country>
</affiliation>
</author>
<author><name sortKey="Busia, Kojo" sort="Busia, Kojo" uniqKey="Busia K" first="Kojo" last="Busia">Kojo Busia</name>
<affiliation><mods:affiliation>Governance and Public Admnistration Division United Nations Economic Commission for Africa Addis Ababa Ethiopia kBusia@uneca.org</mods:affiliation>
<wicri:noCountry code="no comma">Governance and Public Admnistration Division United Nations Economic Commission for Africa Addis Ababa Ethiopia kBusia@uneca.org</wicri:noCountry>
</affiliation>
<affiliation wicri:level="1"><mods:affiliation>E-mail: emcmahon@uvm.edu</mods:affiliation>
<country wicri:rule="url">États-Unis</country>
</affiliation>
</author>
<author><name sortKey="Ascherio, Marta" sort="Ascherio, Marta" uniqKey="Ascherio M" first="Marta" last="Ascherio">Marta Ascherio</name>
<affiliation><mods:affiliation>University of Vermont</mods:affiliation>
<wicri:noCountry code="no comma">University of Vermont</wicri:noCountry>
</affiliation>
<affiliation wicri:level="1"><mods:affiliation>E-mail: emcmahon@uvm.edu</mods:affiliation>
<country wicri:rule="url">États-Unis</country>
</affiliation>
</author>
</titleStmt>
<publicationStmt><idno type="wicri:source">ISTEX</idno>
<idno type="RBID">ISTEX:A19FC4EB49F495CBE0DFDC538E6C6DA489996BA8</idno>
<date when="2013" year="2013">2013</date>
<idno type="doi">10.1163/15692108-12341265</idno>
<idno type="url">https://api.istex.fr/document/A19FC4EB49F495CBE0DFDC538E6C6DA489996BA8/fulltext/pdf</idno>
<idno type="wicri:Area/Istex/Corpus">005091</idno>
<idno type="wicri:explorRef" wicri:stream="Istex" wicri:step="Corpus" wicri:corpus="ISTEX">005091</idno>
<idno type="wicri:Area/Istex/Curation">005091</idno>
</publicationStmt>
<sourceDesc><biblStruct><analytic><title level="a">Comparing Peer Reviews: The Universal Periodic Review of the UN Human Rights Council and the African Peer Review Mechanism</title>
<author><name sortKey="Mcmahon, Edward R" sort="Mcmahon, Edward R" uniqKey="Mcmahon E" first="Edward R." last="Mcmahon">Edward R. Mcmahon</name>
<affiliation wicri:level="1"><mods:affiliation>Department of Community Development and Applied Economics Department of Political Science, University of Vermont emcmahon@uvm.edu</mods:affiliation>
<country wicri:rule="url">États-Unis</country>
<wicri:regionArea>Department of Community Development and Applied Economics Department of Political Science</wicri:regionArea>
</affiliation>
<affiliation wicri:level="1"><mods:affiliation>E-mail: emcmahon@uvm.edu</mods:affiliation>
<country wicri:rule="url">États-Unis</country>
</affiliation>
</author>
<author><name sortKey="Busia, Kojo" sort="Busia, Kojo" uniqKey="Busia K" first="Kojo" last="Busia">Kojo Busia</name>
<affiliation><mods:affiliation>Governance and Public Admnistration Division United Nations Economic Commission for Africa Addis Ababa Ethiopia kBusia@uneca.org</mods:affiliation>
</affiliation>
<affiliation wicri:level="1"><mods:affiliation>E-mail: emcmahon@uvm.edu</mods:affiliation>
<country wicri:rule="url">États-Unis</country>
</affiliation>
</author>
<author><name sortKey="Ascherio, Marta" sort="Ascherio, Marta" uniqKey="Ascherio M" first="Marta" last="Ascherio">Marta Ascherio</name>
<affiliation><mods:affiliation>University of Vermont</mods:affiliation>
</affiliation>
<affiliation wicri:level="1"><mods:affiliation>E-mail: emcmahon@uvm.edu</mods:affiliation>
<country wicri:rule="url">États-Unis</country>
</affiliation>
</author>
</analytic>
<monogr></monogr>
<series><title level="j">African and Asian Studies</title>
<title level="j" type="abbrev">AAS</title>
<idno type="ISSN">1569-2094</idno>
<idno type="eISSN">1569-2108</idno>
<imprint><publisher>Brill</publisher>
<pubPlace>Netherlands</pubPlace>
<date type="published" when="2013">2013</date>
<biblScope unit="volume">12</biblScope>
<biblScope unit="issue">3</biblScope>
<biblScope unit="page" from="266">266</biblScope>
<biblScope unit="page" to="289">289</biblScope>
</imprint>
<idno type="ISSN">1569-2094</idno>
</series>
</biblStruct>
</sourceDesc>
<seriesStmt><idno type="ISSN">1569-2094</idno>
</seriesStmt>
</fileDesc>
<profileDesc><textClass><keywords scheme="KwdEn" xml:lang="en"><term>Addis ababa</term>
<term>African countries</term>
<term>African governance problems</term>
<term>African institute</term>
<term>African leaders</term>
<term>African mechanism</term>
<term>African ownership</term>
<term>African peer review mechanism</term>
<term>African states</term>
<term>African union</term>
<term>African unity</term>
<term>Aprm</term>
<term>Aprm member state</term>
<term>Aprm panel</term>
<term>Aprm process</term>
<term>Aprm reports</term>
<term>Arab emirates</term>
<term>Asian studies</term>
<term>Best practices</term>
<term>Broader range</term>
<term>Burkina faso</term>
<term>Cambridge university press</term>
<term>Civil society</term>
<term>Common initiative</term>
<term>Comparative assessment</term>
<term>Corporate governance</term>
<term>Council council</term>
<term>Country reports</term>
<term>Country review</term>
<term>Country review mission</term>
<term>Country reviews</term>
<term>Country visits</term>
<term>Critical assessment</term>
<term>Critical review</term>
<term>Death penalty</term>
<term>Democratic norms</term>
<term>Democratic quilt</term>
<term>Economic development</term>
<term>Expert answer</term>
<term>External african experts</term>
<term>Final adoption</term>
<term>Final country review report</term>
<term>First cycle</term>
<term>Foreign relations</term>
<term>Friedrich ebert stiftung</term>
<term>General assembly</term>
<term>General assembly resolution</term>
<term>General guidelines</term>
<term>Good governance</term>
<term>Governance</term>
<term>Governance areas</term>
<term>Governance system</term>
<term>Governance systems</term>
<term>Group session</term>
<term>Human rights</term>
<term>Human rights council</term>
<term>Human rights performance</term>
<term>Human rights performance november</term>
<term>Human rights situation</term>
<term>Interactive dialogue</term>
<term>International affairs</term>
<term>International instruments</term>
<term>International norms</term>
<term>International organizations</term>
<term>International service</term>
<term>June</term>
<term>Kumerian press</term>
<term>Land resource management</term>
<term>Latin america</term>
<term>Major stages</term>
<term>Many ideas</term>
<term>Many states</term>
<term>Many ways</term>
<term>Mcmahon</term>
<term>Member states</term>
<term>Method oecd</term>
<term>Monitoring implementation</term>
<term>National report</term>
<term>Nations office</term>
<term>Necessary reforms</term>
<term>Necessary steps</term>
<term>Nepad</term>
<term>Oecd</term>
<term>Other countries</term>
<term>Other states</term>
<term>Palgrave macmillan</term>
<term>Para</term>
<term>Peer review</term>
<term>Peer reviews</term>
<term>Plenary session</term>
<term>Political governance</term>
<term>Positive statements</term>
<term>Poverty reduction</term>
<term>Private sector</term>
<term>Recent years</term>
<term>Regional organizations</term>
<term>Relevant stakeholders</term>
<term>Review mechanism</term>
<term>Review mechanisms</term>
<term>Review process</term>
<term>Rights institutions</term>
<term>Rights situations</term>
<term>Rigorous examination</term>
<term>Rwanda</term>
<term>Second cycle</term>
<term>Stakeholder</term>
<term>State peer review</term>
<term>Steve grudz</term>
<term>Structural issues</term>
<term>Systemic issues</term>
<term>Troubles plague</term>
<term>Universal norms</term>
<term>Voluntary commitments</term>
</keywords>
<keywords scheme="Teeft" xml:lang="en"><term>Addis ababa</term>
<term>African countries</term>
<term>African governance problems</term>
<term>African institute</term>
<term>African leaders</term>
<term>African mechanism</term>
<term>African ownership</term>
<term>African peer review mechanism</term>
<term>African states</term>
<term>African union</term>
<term>African unity</term>
<term>Aprm</term>
<term>Aprm member state</term>
<term>Aprm panel</term>
<term>Aprm process</term>
<term>Aprm reports</term>
<term>Arab emirates</term>
<term>Asian studies</term>
<term>Best practices</term>
<term>Broader range</term>
<term>Burkina faso</term>
<term>Cambridge university press</term>
<term>Civil society</term>
<term>Common initiative</term>
<term>Comparative assessment</term>
<term>Corporate governance</term>
<term>Council council</term>
<term>Country reports</term>
<term>Country review</term>
<term>Country review mission</term>
<term>Country reviews</term>
<term>Country visits</term>
<term>Critical assessment</term>
<term>Critical review</term>
<term>Death penalty</term>
<term>Democratic norms</term>
<term>Democratic quilt</term>
<term>Economic development</term>
<term>Expert answer</term>
<term>External african experts</term>
<term>Final adoption</term>
<term>Final country review report</term>
<term>First cycle</term>
<term>Foreign relations</term>
<term>Friedrich ebert stiftung</term>
<term>General assembly</term>
<term>General assembly resolution</term>
<term>General guidelines</term>
<term>Good governance</term>
<term>Governance</term>
<term>Governance areas</term>
<term>Governance system</term>
<term>Governance systems</term>
<term>Group session</term>
<term>Human rights</term>
<term>Human rights council</term>
<term>Human rights performance</term>
<term>Human rights performance november</term>
<term>Human rights situation</term>
<term>Interactive dialogue</term>
<term>International affairs</term>
<term>International instruments</term>
<term>International norms</term>
<term>International organizations</term>
<term>International service</term>
<term>June</term>
<term>Kumerian press</term>
<term>Land resource management</term>
<term>Latin america</term>
<term>Major stages</term>
<term>Many ideas</term>
<term>Many states</term>
<term>Many ways</term>
<term>Mcmahon</term>
<term>Member states</term>
<term>Method oecd</term>
<term>Monitoring implementation</term>
<term>National report</term>
<term>Nations office</term>
<term>Necessary reforms</term>
<term>Necessary steps</term>
<term>Nepad</term>
<term>Oecd</term>
<term>Other countries</term>
<term>Other states</term>
<term>Palgrave macmillan</term>
<term>Para</term>
<term>Peer review</term>
<term>Peer reviews</term>
<term>Plenary session</term>
<term>Political governance</term>
<term>Positive statements</term>
<term>Poverty reduction</term>
<term>Private sector</term>
<term>Recent years</term>
<term>Regional organizations</term>
<term>Relevant stakeholders</term>
<term>Review mechanism</term>
<term>Review mechanisms</term>
<term>Review process</term>
<term>Rights institutions</term>
<term>Rights situations</term>
<term>Rigorous examination</term>
<term>Rwanda</term>
<term>Second cycle</term>
<term>Stakeholder</term>
<term>State peer review</term>
<term>Steve grudz</term>
<term>Structural issues</term>
<term>Systemic issues</term>
<term>Troubles plague</term>
<term>Universal norms</term>
<term>Voluntary commitments</term>
</keywords>
<keywords scheme="Wicri" type="geographic" xml:lang="fr"><term>Rwanda</term>
</keywords>
<keywords scheme="Wicri" type="topic" xml:lang="fr"><term>Société civile</term>
<term>Gouvernement d'entreprise</term>
<term>Peine de mort</term>
<term>Développement économique</term>
<term>Gouvernance</term>
<term>Droits de l'homme</term>
<term>Politique internationale</term>
<term>Entreprise privée</term>
</keywords>
</textClass>
<langUsage><language ident="en">en</language>
</langUsage>
</profileDesc>
</teiHeader>
<front><div type="abstract">Abstract The Universal Periodic Review Mechanism (UPR) of the UN Human Rights Council and the African Peer Review Mechanism (APRM) reflect a growing trend in international organizations to utilize peer review processes to assess and improve member state governance and human rights performance. The two mechanisms are distinct in many ways. For example, the APRM undertakes a more in-depth and rigorous examination of a broader range of issues. Both review mechanisms, however, also have similarities e.g. they emphasize follow-up and actions to be taken as a result of the reviews and are products of a consensus decision-making process based on voluntary engagement. They represent an evolutionary process by which international norms can be integrated in a national context.</div>
</front>
</TEI>
</record>
Pour manipuler ce document sous Unix (Dilib)
EXPLOR_STEP=$WICRI_ROOT/Wicri/Santé/explor/EdenteV2/Data/Istex/Curation
HfdSelect -h $EXPLOR_STEP/biblio.hfd -nk 005091 | SxmlIndent | more
Ou
HfdSelect -h $EXPLOR_AREA/Data/Istex/Curation/biblio.hfd -nk 005091 | SxmlIndent | more
Pour mettre un lien sur cette page dans le réseau Wicri
{{Explor lien |wiki= Wicri/Santé |area= EdenteV2 |flux= Istex |étape= Curation |type= RBID |clé= ISTEX:A19FC4EB49F495CBE0DFDC538E6C6DA489996BA8 |texte= Comparing Peer Reviews: The Universal Periodic Review of the UN Human Rights Council and the African Peer Review Mechanism }}
![]() | This area was generated with Dilib version V0.6.32. | ![]() |