Serveur d'exploration sur le patient édenté

Attention, ce site est en cours de développement !
Attention, site généré par des moyens informatiques à partir de corpus bruts.
Les informations ne sont donc pas validées.

Regulation and the Role of Trust: Reflections from the Mining Industry

Identifieur interne : 004D30 ( Istex/Curation ); précédent : 004D29; suivant : 004D31

Regulation and the Role of Trust: Reflections from the Mining Industry

Auteurs : Neil Gunningham [Royaume-Uni] ; Darren Sinclair [Australie]

Source :

RBID : ISTEX:9A936464DEE76BDB42AC1F7142D3A571A7254941

Descripteurs français

English descriptors

Abstract

The role of prosecution in achieving compliance with social regulation is a highly contentious issue, nowhere more so than with regard to work‐related injury and death in the New South Wales mining industry. Following a mining disaster, political pressure prompted the mines inspectorate to abandon its traditional ‘advise and persuade’ approach in favour of a much tougher, deterrence‐oriented approach. Our field‐work suggests that while the former approach can result in regulatory capture, the latter can be equally counterproductive. In the mining industry, interactions between inspectors and the regulated industry are frequent and ongoing and trust is central to constructive relations. When those relations break down (as under an inappropriate prosecution policy) then dialogue ceases, information is withheld rather than shared, in‐firm accident investigation, prevention, and remedial action are inhibited and both sides retreat to a form of adversarialism that undermines regulatory effectiveness. Through a 20‐year case study of the mines inspectorate, the article demonstrates the centrality of trust to regulatory effectiveness, how it can be lost, and how it can best be regained.

Url:
DOI: 10.1111/j.1467-6478.2009.00462.x

Links toward previous steps (curation, corpus...)


Links to Exploration step

ISTEX:9A936464DEE76BDB42AC1F7142D3A571A7254941

Le document en format XML

<record>
<TEI wicri:istexFullTextTei="biblStruct">
<teiHeader>
<fileDesc>
<titleStmt>
<title xml:lang="en">Regulation and the Role of Trust: Reflections from the Mining Industry</title>
<author>
<name sortKey="Gunningham, Neil" sort="Gunningham, Neil" uniqKey="Gunningham N" first="Neil" last="Gunningham">Neil Gunningham</name>
<affiliation wicri:level="1">
<mods:affiliation>Fenner School of Environment and Society and Regulatory Institutions Network, The Australian National University, Canberra, ACT 0200, Australia and ESRC Centre for Business Relationships, Accountability, Sustainability and Society (BRASS), Cardiff University, 55 Park Place, Cardiff CF 10 3AT, WalesNeil.Gunningham@anu.edu.auGunninghamN@cardiff.ac.uk</mods:affiliation>
<country wicri:rule="url">Royaume-Uni</country>
<wicri:regionArea>Fenner School of Environment and Society and Regulatory Institutions Network, The Australian National University, Canberra, ACT 0200, Australia and ESRC Centre for Business Relationships, Accountability, Sustainability and Society (BRASS), Cardiff University, 55 Park Place, Cardiff CF 10 3AT</wicri:regionArea>
</affiliation>
</author>
<author>
<name sortKey="Sinclair, Darren" sort="Sinclair, Darren" uniqKey="Sinclair D" first="Darren" last="Sinclair">Darren Sinclair</name>
<affiliation wicri:level="1">
<mods:affiliation>Fenner School of Environment and Society, ANU, Canberra, ACT 0200, Australiadarren.sinclair@anu.edu.au</mods:affiliation>
<country wicri:rule="url">Australie</country>
<wicri:regionArea>Fenner School of Environment and Society, ANU, Canberra, ACT 0200</wicri:regionArea>
</affiliation>
</author>
</titleStmt>
<publicationStmt>
<idno type="wicri:source">ISTEX</idno>
<idno type="RBID">ISTEX:9A936464DEE76BDB42AC1F7142D3A571A7254941</idno>
<date when="2009" year="2009">2009</date>
<idno type="doi">10.1111/j.1467-6478.2009.00462.x</idno>
<idno type="url">https://api.istex.fr/document/9A936464DEE76BDB42AC1F7142D3A571A7254941/fulltext/pdf</idno>
<idno type="wicri:Area/Istex/Corpus">004D30</idno>
<idno type="wicri:explorRef" wicri:stream="Istex" wicri:step="Corpus" wicri:corpus="ISTEX">004D30</idno>
<idno type="wicri:Area/Istex/Curation">004D30</idno>
</publicationStmt>
<sourceDesc>
<biblStruct>
<analytic>
<title level="a" type="main">Regulation and the Role of Trust: Reflections from the Mining Industry</title>
<author>
<name sortKey="Gunningham, Neil" sort="Gunningham, Neil" uniqKey="Gunningham N" first="Neil" last="Gunningham">Neil Gunningham</name>
<affiliation wicri:level="1">
<mods:affiliation>Fenner School of Environment and Society and Regulatory Institutions Network, The Australian National University, Canberra, ACT 0200, Australia and ESRC Centre for Business Relationships, Accountability, Sustainability and Society (BRASS), Cardiff University, 55 Park Place, Cardiff CF 10 3AT, WalesNeil.Gunningham@anu.edu.auGunninghamN@cardiff.ac.uk</mods:affiliation>
<country wicri:rule="url">Royaume-Uni</country>
<wicri:regionArea>Fenner School of Environment and Society and Regulatory Institutions Network, The Australian National University, Canberra, ACT 0200, Australia and ESRC Centre for Business Relationships, Accountability, Sustainability and Society (BRASS), Cardiff University, 55 Park Place, Cardiff CF 10 3AT</wicri:regionArea>
</affiliation>
</author>
<author>
<name sortKey="Sinclair, Darren" sort="Sinclair, Darren" uniqKey="Sinclair D" first="Darren" last="Sinclair">Darren Sinclair</name>
<affiliation wicri:level="1">
<mods:affiliation>Fenner School of Environment and Society, ANU, Canberra, ACT 0200, Australiadarren.sinclair@anu.edu.au</mods:affiliation>
<country wicri:rule="url">Australie</country>
<wicri:regionArea>Fenner School of Environment and Society, ANU, Canberra, ACT 0200</wicri:regionArea>
</affiliation>
</author>
</analytic>
<monogr></monogr>
<series>
<title level="j" type="main">Journal of Law and Society</title>
<title level="j" type="alt">JOURNAL OF LAW SOCIETY</title>
<idno type="ISSN">0263-323X</idno>
<idno type="eISSN">1467-6478</idno>
<imprint>
<biblScope unit="vol">36</biblScope>
<biblScope unit="issue">2</biblScope>
<biblScope unit="page" from="167">167</biblScope>
<biblScope unit="page" to="194">194</biblScope>
<biblScope unit="page-count">28</biblScope>
<publisher>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</publisher>
<pubPlace>Oxford, UK</pubPlace>
<date type="published" when="2009-06">2009-06</date>
</imprint>
<idno type="ISSN">0263-323X</idno>
</series>
</biblStruct>
</sourceDesc>
<seriesStmt>
<idno type="ISSN">0263-323X</idno>
</seriesStmt>
</fileDesc>
<profileDesc>
<textClass>
<keywords scheme="KwdEn" xml:lang="en">
<term>Accident investigation</term>
<term>Audit tools</term>
<term>Balanced approach</term>
<term>Baryulgil report</term>
<term>Braithwaite</term>
<term>Cardiff</term>
<term>Cardiff university</term>
<term>Case study</term>
<term>Company officers</term>
<term>Comparable degree</term>
<term>Compliance</term>
<term>Compliance trap</term>
<term>Consensus view</term>
<term>Constructive dialogue</term>
<term>Constructive relations</term>
<term>Contentious issue</term>
<term>Corporate management</term>
<term>Corporate managers</term>
<term>Culpability</term>
<term>Current grievances</term>
<term>Direct contact</term>
<term>Dramatic change</term>
<term>Duty holders</term>
<term>Effective inspection</term>
<term>Employer groups</term>
<term>Enforcement activity</term>
<term>Enforcement policy</term>
<term>Enforcement pyramid</term>
<term>Enforcement style</term>
<term>Engineering inspectors</term>
<term>Fatality</term>
<term>General approach</term>
<term>Good actors</term>
<term>Good faith</term>
<term>Gretley</term>
<term>Gretley case</term>
<term>Gretley disaster</term>
<term>Gunningham</term>
<term>High degree</term>
<term>Higher penalties</term>
<term>Human behavior</term>
<term>Important role</term>
<term>Inappropriate prosecution policy</term>
<term>Individual manager</term>
<term>Individual managers</term>
<term>Industry associations</term>
<term>Injury results</term>
<term>Inspector</term>
<term>Inspectorate</term>
<term>International research</term>
<term>Investigation training</term>
<term>Investigation unit</term>
<term>Investigations unit</term>
<term>John braithwaite</term>
<term>Journal compilation</term>
<term>Large majority</term>
<term>Legitimacy</term>
<term>Many inspectors</term>
<term>Mechanical engineering inspectors</term>
<term>Middle ground</term>
<term>Middle path</term>
<term>Mine management</term>
<term>Mine manager</term>
<term>Mine managers</term>
<term>Mine safety</term>
<term>Mine site</term>
<term>Mine sites</term>
<term>Mineral resources</term>
<term>Mines inspectorate</term>
<term>Mines inspectors</term>
<term>Mines safety review</term>
<term>Mining</term>
<term>Mining companies</term>
<term>Mining disaster</term>
<term>Mining industries</term>
<term>Mining industry</term>
<term>Mistrust</term>
<term>More resources</term>
<term>Muscular prosecution policy</term>
<term>Newcastle wallsend coal company</term>
<term>Occupational health</term>
<term>Offence</term>
<term>Organizational trust</term>
<term>Other hand</term>
<term>Parliamentary inquiry</term>
<term>Past experience</term>
<term>Political pressure</term>
<term>Present purposes</term>
<term>Preventative terms</term>
<term>Primary industries</term>
<term>Procedural justice</term>
<term>Prosecution</term>
<term>Prosecution policy</term>
<term>Prosecution process</term>
<term>Public sympathy</term>
<term>Pyramid</term>
<term>Regulator</term>
<term>Regulatory</term>
<term>Regulatory conversations</term>
<term>Regulatory effectiveness</term>
<term>Regulatory enforcement</term>
<term>Regulatory outcomes</term>
<term>Regulatory requirements</term>
<term>Regulatory style</term>
<term>Remedial action</term>
<term>Report incidents</term>
<term>Representative sample</term>
<term>Responsive</term>
<term>Responsive regulation</term>
<term>Restorative justice</term>
<term>Risk analysis</term>
<term>Risk management</term>
<term>Safety culture</term>
<term>Safety regulation</term>
<term>Same time</term>
<term>Senior management</term>
<term>Serious breaches</term>
<term>Serious injury</term>
<term>Sides retreat</term>
<term>Small minority</term>
<term>Social control</term>
<term>Social regulation</term>
<term>Stakeholder</term>
<term>Statutory positions</term>
<term>Strict liability</term>
<term>Substantial penalties</term>
<term>Target failures</term>
<term>Tough stance</term>
<term>Trade unions</term>
<term>Tyler</term>
<term>Unilateral imposition</term>
<term>Voluntary compliance</term>
<term>Wales department</term>
<term>Wales government mine safety review</term>
<term>Wales mine safety review</term>
<term>Wales minerals council</term>
<term>Wales mining industry</term>
<term>Workplace</term>
<term>Workplace safety</term>
</keywords>
<keywords scheme="Teeft" xml:lang="en">
<term>Accident investigation</term>
<term>Audit tools</term>
<term>Balanced approach</term>
<term>Baryulgil report</term>
<term>Braithwaite</term>
<term>Cardiff</term>
<term>Cardiff university</term>
<term>Case study</term>
<term>Company officers</term>
<term>Comparable degree</term>
<term>Compliance</term>
<term>Compliance trap</term>
<term>Consensus view</term>
<term>Constructive dialogue</term>
<term>Constructive relations</term>
<term>Contentious issue</term>
<term>Corporate management</term>
<term>Corporate managers</term>
<term>Culpability</term>
<term>Current grievances</term>
<term>Direct contact</term>
<term>Dramatic change</term>
<term>Duty holders</term>
<term>Effective inspection</term>
<term>Employer groups</term>
<term>Enforcement activity</term>
<term>Enforcement policy</term>
<term>Enforcement pyramid</term>
<term>Enforcement style</term>
<term>Engineering inspectors</term>
<term>Fatality</term>
<term>General approach</term>
<term>Good actors</term>
<term>Good faith</term>
<term>Gretley</term>
<term>Gretley case</term>
<term>Gretley disaster</term>
<term>Gunningham</term>
<term>High degree</term>
<term>Higher penalties</term>
<term>Human behavior</term>
<term>Important role</term>
<term>Inappropriate prosecution policy</term>
<term>Individual manager</term>
<term>Individual managers</term>
<term>Industry associations</term>
<term>Injury results</term>
<term>Inspector</term>
<term>Inspectorate</term>
<term>International research</term>
<term>Investigation training</term>
<term>Investigation unit</term>
<term>Investigations unit</term>
<term>John braithwaite</term>
<term>Journal compilation</term>
<term>Large majority</term>
<term>Legitimacy</term>
<term>Many inspectors</term>
<term>Mechanical engineering inspectors</term>
<term>Middle ground</term>
<term>Middle path</term>
<term>Mine management</term>
<term>Mine manager</term>
<term>Mine managers</term>
<term>Mine safety</term>
<term>Mine site</term>
<term>Mine sites</term>
<term>Mineral resources</term>
<term>Mines inspectorate</term>
<term>Mines inspectors</term>
<term>Mines safety review</term>
<term>Mining</term>
<term>Mining companies</term>
<term>Mining disaster</term>
<term>Mining industries</term>
<term>Mining industry</term>
<term>Mistrust</term>
<term>More resources</term>
<term>Muscular prosecution policy</term>
<term>Newcastle wallsend coal company</term>
<term>Occupational health</term>
<term>Offence</term>
<term>Organizational trust</term>
<term>Other hand</term>
<term>Parliamentary inquiry</term>
<term>Past experience</term>
<term>Political pressure</term>
<term>Present purposes</term>
<term>Preventative terms</term>
<term>Primary industries</term>
<term>Procedural justice</term>
<term>Prosecution</term>
<term>Prosecution policy</term>
<term>Prosecution process</term>
<term>Public sympathy</term>
<term>Pyramid</term>
<term>Regulator</term>
<term>Regulatory</term>
<term>Regulatory conversations</term>
<term>Regulatory effectiveness</term>
<term>Regulatory enforcement</term>
<term>Regulatory outcomes</term>
<term>Regulatory requirements</term>
<term>Regulatory style</term>
<term>Remedial action</term>
<term>Report incidents</term>
<term>Representative sample</term>
<term>Responsive</term>
<term>Responsive regulation</term>
<term>Restorative justice</term>
<term>Risk analysis</term>
<term>Risk management</term>
<term>Safety culture</term>
<term>Safety regulation</term>
<term>Same time</term>
<term>Senior management</term>
<term>Serious breaches</term>
<term>Serious injury</term>
<term>Sides retreat</term>
<term>Small minority</term>
<term>Social control</term>
<term>Social regulation</term>
<term>Stakeholder</term>
<term>Statutory positions</term>
<term>Strict liability</term>
<term>Substantial penalties</term>
<term>Target failures</term>
<term>Tough stance</term>
<term>Trade unions</term>
<term>Tyler</term>
<term>Unilateral imposition</term>
<term>Voluntary compliance</term>
<term>Wales department</term>
<term>Wales government mine safety review</term>
<term>Wales mine safety review</term>
<term>Wales minerals council</term>
<term>Wales mining industry</term>
<term>Workplace</term>
<term>Workplace safety</term>
</keywords>
<keywords scheme="Wicri" type="topic" xml:lang="fr">
<term>étude de cas</term>
<term>Légitimité</term>
<term>Ressource minérale</term>
<term>Industrie minière</term>
<term>Santé au travail</term>
<term>Infraction</term>
<term>Enquête parlementaire</term>
<term>Justice réparatrice</term>
<term>Cadre supérieur</term>
<term>Lieu de travail</term>
</keywords>
</textClass>
</profileDesc>
</teiHeader>
<front>
<div type="abstract" xml:lang="en">The role of prosecution in achieving compliance with social regulation is a highly contentious issue, nowhere more so than with regard to work‐related injury and death in the New South Wales mining industry. Following a mining disaster, political pressure prompted the mines inspectorate to abandon its traditional ‘advise and persuade’ approach in favour of a much tougher, deterrence‐oriented approach. Our field‐work suggests that while the former approach can result in regulatory capture, the latter can be equally counterproductive. In the mining industry, interactions between inspectors and the regulated industry are frequent and ongoing and trust is central to constructive relations. When those relations break down (as under an inappropriate prosecution policy) then dialogue ceases, information is withheld rather than shared, in‐firm accident investigation, prevention, and remedial action are inhibited and both sides retreat to a form of adversarialism that undermines regulatory effectiveness. Through a 20‐year case study of the mines inspectorate, the article demonstrates the centrality of trust to regulatory effectiveness, how it can be lost, and how it can best be regained.</div>
</front>
</TEI>
</record>

Pour manipuler ce document sous Unix (Dilib)

EXPLOR_STEP=$WICRI_ROOT/Wicri/Santé/explor/EdenteV2/Data/Istex/Curation
HfdSelect -h $EXPLOR_STEP/biblio.hfd -nk 004D30 | SxmlIndent | more

Ou

HfdSelect -h $EXPLOR_AREA/Data/Istex/Curation/biblio.hfd -nk 004D30 | SxmlIndent | more

Pour mettre un lien sur cette page dans le réseau Wicri

{{Explor lien
   |wiki=    Wicri/Santé
   |area=    EdenteV2
   |flux=    Istex
   |étape=   Curation
   |type=    RBID
   |clé=     ISTEX:9A936464DEE76BDB42AC1F7142D3A571A7254941
   |texte=   Regulation and the Role of Trust: Reflections from the Mining Industry
}}

Wicri

This area was generated with Dilib version V0.6.32.
Data generation: Thu Nov 30 15:26:48 2017. Site generation: Tue Mar 8 16:36:20 2022