Do Gender Quotas Foster Women’s Political Engagement?
Identifieur interne : 004836 ( Istex/Curation ); précédent : 004835; suivant : 004837Do Gender Quotas Foster Women’s Political Engagement?
Auteurs : P R Zetterberg [Suède]Source :
- Political research quarterly [ 1065-9129 ] ; 2009-12.
Descripteurs français
- Wicri :
- geographic : Argentine.
- topic : Exécutif, Participation politique, Partis politiques, Représentation politique, Science politique, Politique publique, Démocratie représentative.
English descriptors
- KwdEn :
- Additional analyses, Additive index, Affirmative action measure, Affirmative action measures, Affirmative action policies, Analysis addresses, Argentina, Behavioral effects, Best data, Cambridge university press, Campaign activities, Candidate lists, Candidate selection, Case studies, Certain quota, Common traits, Contextual, Contextual analyses, Contextual analysis, Control variables, Country level, Dahlerup, Deletion, Democratic development, Dependent variables, Descriptive representation, Descriptive statistics, Development index, Different levels, Different quota systems, Different results, Dissemination process, Drude dahlerup, Empirical focus, Ethnic quotas, Exact wording, Executive body, Explanatory factors, External efficacy, Extraparliamentarian activities, Female candidates, Female constituents, Female representation, Female representatives, First place, Freedom house, Further light, Gender, Gender equality, Gender quota legislation, Gender quotas, Gender role attitudes, Harvard university press, Higher level, Htun, Human development report, Individual level, Latin america, Latin american, Latin american countries, Latin american women, Legal quotas, Legislative bodies, Lehman schlozman, Listwise, Listwise deletion, Longitudinal data, Main religion, Mass publics, Mettler, Mona lena, More consequences, Multicollinearity problems, Multivariate analysis, National level, National quota laws, Nations development program, Noncompliance, Nonquota countries, Nonsignificant relationships, Ordinal, Ordinal scale variables, Other countries, Other factors, Other hand, Other latin american countries, Other respondents, Other responses, Other sources, Other values, Other women, Particular leaders, Party campaign activities, Party quotas, Policy feedback, Political action, Political activities, Political attitudes, Political beliefs, Political contact, Political contacts, Political elites, Political engagement, Political interest, Political involvement, Political knowledge, Political life, Political participation, Political parties, Political party, Political representation, Political research, Political role models, Political science, Political trust, Positive effects, Positive impact, Positive impacts, Positive relationship, Possible effects, Possible impact, Possible links, Protest activities, Public life, Public policy, Quota, Quota adoption, Quota laws, Quota legislation, Quota policies, Quota project, Quota regime, Quota system, Quota systems, Random intercept model, Rank order, Representative democracy, Role model effects, Rules development index, Rules quota, Schlozman, Schram, Science association, Signal effects, Significant relationship, Similar results, Single item, Socioeconomic development, Socioeconomic modernization, Sos, State structure, Statistical analyses, Statistical model, Substantial impact, Substantive representation, Such data, Such measures, Such quotas, Such rules, Supplemental materials, Symbolic representation, Theoretical framework, Unstandardized regression coefficients, Variable specification, Variance inflation factor statistics, Verba, Women citizens, Women representatives, Zetterberg, Zetterberg gender quotas.
- Teeft :
- Additional analyses, Additive index, Affirmative action measure, Affirmative action measures, Affirmative action policies, Analysis addresses, Argentina, Behavioral effects, Best data, Cambridge university press, Campaign activities, Candidate lists, Candidate selection, Case studies, Certain quota, Common traits, Contextual, Contextual analyses, Contextual analysis, Control variables, Country level, Dahlerup, Deletion, Democratic development, Dependent variables, Descriptive representation, Descriptive statistics, Development index, Different levels, Different quota systems, Different results, Dissemination process, Drude dahlerup, Empirical focus, Ethnic quotas, Exact wording, Executive body, Explanatory factors, External efficacy, Extraparliamentarian activities, Female candidates, Female constituents, Female representation, Female representatives, First place, Freedom house, Further light, Gender, Gender equality, Gender quota legislation, Gender quotas, Gender role attitudes, Harvard university press, Higher level, Htun, Human development report, Individual level, Latin america, Latin american, Latin american countries, Latin american women, Legal quotas, Legislative bodies, Lehman schlozman, Listwise, Listwise deletion, Longitudinal data, Main religion, Mass publics, Mettler, Mona lena, More consequences, Multicollinearity problems, Multivariate analysis, National level, National quota laws, Nations development program, Noncompliance, Nonquota countries, Nonsignificant relationships, Ordinal, Ordinal scale variables, Other countries, Other factors, Other hand, Other latin american countries, Other respondents, Other responses, Other sources, Other values, Other women, Particular leaders, Party campaign activities, Party quotas, Policy feedback, Political action, Political activities, Political attitudes, Political beliefs, Political contact, Political contacts, Political elites, Political engagement, Political interest, Political involvement, Political knowledge, Political life, Political participation, Political parties, Political party, Political representation, Political research, Political role models, Political science, Political trust, Positive effects, Positive impact, Positive impacts, Positive relationship, Possible effects, Possible impact, Possible links, Protest activities, Public life, Public policy, Quota, Quota adoption, Quota laws, Quota legislation, Quota policies, Quota project, Quota regime, Quota system, Quota systems, Random intercept model, Rank order, Representative democracy, Role model effects, Rules development index, Rules quota, Schlozman, Schram, Science association, Signal effects, Significant relationship, Similar results, Single item, Socioeconomic development, Socioeconomic modernization, Sos, State structure, Statistical analyses, Statistical model, Substantial impact, Substantive representation, Such data, Such measures, Such quotas, Such rules, Supplemental materials, Symbolic representation, Theoretical framework, Unstandardized regression coefficients, Variable specification, Variance inflation factor statistics, Verba, Women citizens, Women representatives, Zetterberg, Zetterberg gender quotas.
Abstract
Gender quotas have been held to have more far-reaching consequences than increasing women’s political representation. Some scholars claim that they foster women’s overall political engagement. After elaborating a theoretical framework on how affirmative action policies to legislative bodies might be beneficial to constituents of the targeted group, the author tests this hypothesis on women in seventeen Latin American countries. Contrasting previous claims, the author shows that there is no general proof of attitudinal or behavioral effects. The analysis represents an initial attempt to theorize and use large-scale data to examine the more long-term consequences of quota policies on female constituents’ political involvement.
Url:
DOI: 10.1177/1065912908322411
Links toward previous steps (curation, corpus...)
- to stream Istex, to step Corpus: Pour aller vers cette notice dans l'étape Curation :004836
Links to Exploration step
ISTEX:90CF7A17AC5F15ABE4BC30566274E1E29D1CDE6ELe document en format XML
<record><TEI wicri:istexFullTextTei="biblStruct"><teiHeader><fileDesc><titleStmt><title xml:lang="en">Do Gender Quotas Foster Women’s Political Engagement?</title>
<author wicri:is="90%"><name sortKey="Zetterberg, P R" sort="Zetterberg, P R" uniqKey="Zetterberg P" first="P R" last="Zetterberg">P R Zetterberg</name>
<affiliation wicri:level="1"><mods:affiliation>Uppsala University, Sweden</mods:affiliation>
<country xml:lang="fr">Suède</country>
<wicri:regionArea>Uppsala University</wicri:regionArea>
</affiliation>
</author>
</titleStmt>
<publicationStmt><idno type="wicri:source">ISTEX</idno>
<idno type="RBID">ISTEX:90CF7A17AC5F15ABE4BC30566274E1E29D1CDE6E</idno>
<date when="2009" year="2009">2009</date>
<idno type="doi">10.1177/1065912908322411</idno>
<idno type="url">https://api.istex.fr/document/90CF7A17AC5F15ABE4BC30566274E1E29D1CDE6E/fulltext/pdf</idno>
<idno type="wicri:Area/Istex/Corpus">004836</idno>
<idno type="wicri:explorRef" wicri:stream="Istex" wicri:step="Corpus" wicri:corpus="ISTEX">004836</idno>
<idno type="wicri:Area/Istex/Curation">004836</idno>
</publicationStmt>
<sourceDesc><biblStruct><analytic><title level="a" type="main" xml:lang="en">Do Gender Quotas Foster Women’s Political Engagement?</title>
<author wicri:is="90%"><name sortKey="Zetterberg, P R" sort="Zetterberg, P R" uniqKey="Zetterberg P" first="P R" last="Zetterberg">P R Zetterberg</name>
<affiliation wicri:level="1"><mods:affiliation>Uppsala University, Sweden</mods:affiliation>
<country xml:lang="fr">Suède</country>
<wicri:regionArea>Uppsala University</wicri:regionArea>
</affiliation>
</author>
</analytic>
<monogr></monogr>
<series><title level="j">Political research quarterly</title>
<idno type="ISSN">1065-9129</idno>
<idno type="eISSN">1938-2758</idno>
<imprint><publisher>SAGE Publications</publisher>
<pubPlace>Sage CA: Los Angeles, CA</pubPlace>
<date type="published" when="2009-12">2009-12</date>
<biblScope unit="volume">62</biblScope>
<biblScope unit="issue">4</biblScope>
<biblScope unit="page" from="715">715</biblScope>
<biblScope unit="page" to="730">730</biblScope>
</imprint>
<idno type="ISSN">1065-9129</idno>
</series>
</biblStruct>
</sourceDesc>
<seriesStmt><idno type="ISSN">1065-9129</idno>
</seriesStmt>
</fileDesc>
<profileDesc><textClass><keywords scheme="KwdEn" xml:lang="en"><term>Additional analyses</term>
<term>Additive index</term>
<term>Affirmative action measure</term>
<term>Affirmative action measures</term>
<term>Affirmative action policies</term>
<term>Analysis addresses</term>
<term>Argentina</term>
<term>Behavioral effects</term>
<term>Best data</term>
<term>Cambridge university press</term>
<term>Campaign activities</term>
<term>Candidate lists</term>
<term>Candidate selection</term>
<term>Case studies</term>
<term>Certain quota</term>
<term>Common traits</term>
<term>Contextual</term>
<term>Contextual analyses</term>
<term>Contextual analysis</term>
<term>Control variables</term>
<term>Country level</term>
<term>Dahlerup</term>
<term>Deletion</term>
<term>Democratic development</term>
<term>Dependent variables</term>
<term>Descriptive representation</term>
<term>Descriptive statistics</term>
<term>Development index</term>
<term>Different levels</term>
<term>Different quota systems</term>
<term>Different results</term>
<term>Dissemination process</term>
<term>Drude dahlerup</term>
<term>Empirical focus</term>
<term>Ethnic quotas</term>
<term>Exact wording</term>
<term>Executive body</term>
<term>Explanatory factors</term>
<term>External efficacy</term>
<term>Extraparliamentarian activities</term>
<term>Female candidates</term>
<term>Female constituents</term>
<term>Female representation</term>
<term>Female representatives</term>
<term>First place</term>
<term>Freedom house</term>
<term>Further light</term>
<term>Gender</term>
<term>Gender equality</term>
<term>Gender quota legislation</term>
<term>Gender quotas</term>
<term>Gender role attitudes</term>
<term>Harvard university press</term>
<term>Higher level</term>
<term>Htun</term>
<term>Human development report</term>
<term>Individual level</term>
<term>Latin america</term>
<term>Latin american</term>
<term>Latin american countries</term>
<term>Latin american women</term>
<term>Legal quotas</term>
<term>Legislative bodies</term>
<term>Lehman schlozman</term>
<term>Listwise</term>
<term>Listwise deletion</term>
<term>Longitudinal data</term>
<term>Main religion</term>
<term>Mass publics</term>
<term>Mettler</term>
<term>Mona lena</term>
<term>More consequences</term>
<term>Multicollinearity problems</term>
<term>Multivariate analysis</term>
<term>National level</term>
<term>National quota laws</term>
<term>Nations development program</term>
<term>Noncompliance</term>
<term>Nonquota countries</term>
<term>Nonsignificant relationships</term>
<term>Ordinal</term>
<term>Ordinal scale variables</term>
<term>Other countries</term>
<term>Other factors</term>
<term>Other hand</term>
<term>Other latin american countries</term>
<term>Other respondents</term>
<term>Other responses</term>
<term>Other sources</term>
<term>Other values</term>
<term>Other women</term>
<term>Particular leaders</term>
<term>Party campaign activities</term>
<term>Party quotas</term>
<term>Policy feedback</term>
<term>Political action</term>
<term>Political activities</term>
<term>Political attitudes</term>
<term>Political beliefs</term>
<term>Political contact</term>
<term>Political contacts</term>
<term>Political elites</term>
<term>Political engagement</term>
<term>Political interest</term>
<term>Political involvement</term>
<term>Political knowledge</term>
<term>Political life</term>
<term>Political participation</term>
<term>Political parties</term>
<term>Political party</term>
<term>Political representation</term>
<term>Political research</term>
<term>Political role models</term>
<term>Political science</term>
<term>Political trust</term>
<term>Positive effects</term>
<term>Positive impact</term>
<term>Positive impacts</term>
<term>Positive relationship</term>
<term>Possible effects</term>
<term>Possible impact</term>
<term>Possible links</term>
<term>Protest activities</term>
<term>Public life</term>
<term>Public policy</term>
<term>Quota</term>
<term>Quota adoption</term>
<term>Quota laws</term>
<term>Quota legislation</term>
<term>Quota policies</term>
<term>Quota project</term>
<term>Quota regime</term>
<term>Quota system</term>
<term>Quota systems</term>
<term>Random intercept model</term>
<term>Rank order</term>
<term>Representative democracy</term>
<term>Role model effects</term>
<term>Rules development index</term>
<term>Rules quota</term>
<term>Schlozman</term>
<term>Schram</term>
<term>Science association</term>
<term>Signal effects</term>
<term>Significant relationship</term>
<term>Similar results</term>
<term>Single item</term>
<term>Socioeconomic development</term>
<term>Socioeconomic modernization</term>
<term>Sos</term>
<term>State structure</term>
<term>Statistical analyses</term>
<term>Statistical model</term>
<term>Substantial impact</term>
<term>Substantive representation</term>
<term>Such data</term>
<term>Such measures</term>
<term>Such quotas</term>
<term>Such rules</term>
<term>Supplemental materials</term>
<term>Symbolic representation</term>
<term>Theoretical framework</term>
<term>Unstandardized regression coefficients</term>
<term>Variable specification</term>
<term>Variance inflation factor statistics</term>
<term>Verba</term>
<term>Women citizens</term>
<term>Women representatives</term>
<term>Zetterberg</term>
<term>Zetterberg gender quotas</term>
</keywords>
<keywords scheme="Teeft" xml:lang="en"><term>Additional analyses</term>
<term>Additive index</term>
<term>Affirmative action measure</term>
<term>Affirmative action measures</term>
<term>Affirmative action policies</term>
<term>Analysis addresses</term>
<term>Argentina</term>
<term>Behavioral effects</term>
<term>Best data</term>
<term>Cambridge university press</term>
<term>Campaign activities</term>
<term>Candidate lists</term>
<term>Candidate selection</term>
<term>Case studies</term>
<term>Certain quota</term>
<term>Common traits</term>
<term>Contextual</term>
<term>Contextual analyses</term>
<term>Contextual analysis</term>
<term>Control variables</term>
<term>Country level</term>
<term>Dahlerup</term>
<term>Deletion</term>
<term>Democratic development</term>
<term>Dependent variables</term>
<term>Descriptive representation</term>
<term>Descriptive statistics</term>
<term>Development index</term>
<term>Different levels</term>
<term>Different quota systems</term>
<term>Different results</term>
<term>Dissemination process</term>
<term>Drude dahlerup</term>
<term>Empirical focus</term>
<term>Ethnic quotas</term>
<term>Exact wording</term>
<term>Executive body</term>
<term>Explanatory factors</term>
<term>External efficacy</term>
<term>Extraparliamentarian activities</term>
<term>Female candidates</term>
<term>Female constituents</term>
<term>Female representation</term>
<term>Female representatives</term>
<term>First place</term>
<term>Freedom house</term>
<term>Further light</term>
<term>Gender</term>
<term>Gender equality</term>
<term>Gender quota legislation</term>
<term>Gender quotas</term>
<term>Gender role attitudes</term>
<term>Harvard university press</term>
<term>Higher level</term>
<term>Htun</term>
<term>Human development report</term>
<term>Individual level</term>
<term>Latin america</term>
<term>Latin american</term>
<term>Latin american countries</term>
<term>Latin american women</term>
<term>Legal quotas</term>
<term>Legislative bodies</term>
<term>Lehman schlozman</term>
<term>Listwise</term>
<term>Listwise deletion</term>
<term>Longitudinal data</term>
<term>Main religion</term>
<term>Mass publics</term>
<term>Mettler</term>
<term>Mona lena</term>
<term>More consequences</term>
<term>Multicollinearity problems</term>
<term>Multivariate analysis</term>
<term>National level</term>
<term>National quota laws</term>
<term>Nations development program</term>
<term>Noncompliance</term>
<term>Nonquota countries</term>
<term>Nonsignificant relationships</term>
<term>Ordinal</term>
<term>Ordinal scale variables</term>
<term>Other countries</term>
<term>Other factors</term>
<term>Other hand</term>
<term>Other latin american countries</term>
<term>Other respondents</term>
<term>Other responses</term>
<term>Other sources</term>
<term>Other values</term>
<term>Other women</term>
<term>Particular leaders</term>
<term>Party campaign activities</term>
<term>Party quotas</term>
<term>Policy feedback</term>
<term>Political action</term>
<term>Political activities</term>
<term>Political attitudes</term>
<term>Political beliefs</term>
<term>Political contact</term>
<term>Political contacts</term>
<term>Political elites</term>
<term>Political engagement</term>
<term>Political interest</term>
<term>Political involvement</term>
<term>Political knowledge</term>
<term>Political life</term>
<term>Political participation</term>
<term>Political parties</term>
<term>Political party</term>
<term>Political representation</term>
<term>Political research</term>
<term>Political role models</term>
<term>Political science</term>
<term>Political trust</term>
<term>Positive effects</term>
<term>Positive impact</term>
<term>Positive impacts</term>
<term>Positive relationship</term>
<term>Possible effects</term>
<term>Possible impact</term>
<term>Possible links</term>
<term>Protest activities</term>
<term>Public life</term>
<term>Public policy</term>
<term>Quota</term>
<term>Quota adoption</term>
<term>Quota laws</term>
<term>Quota legislation</term>
<term>Quota policies</term>
<term>Quota project</term>
<term>Quota regime</term>
<term>Quota system</term>
<term>Quota systems</term>
<term>Random intercept model</term>
<term>Rank order</term>
<term>Representative democracy</term>
<term>Role model effects</term>
<term>Rules development index</term>
<term>Rules quota</term>
<term>Schlozman</term>
<term>Schram</term>
<term>Science association</term>
<term>Signal effects</term>
<term>Significant relationship</term>
<term>Similar results</term>
<term>Single item</term>
<term>Socioeconomic development</term>
<term>Socioeconomic modernization</term>
<term>Sos</term>
<term>State structure</term>
<term>Statistical analyses</term>
<term>Statistical model</term>
<term>Substantial impact</term>
<term>Substantive representation</term>
<term>Such data</term>
<term>Such measures</term>
<term>Such quotas</term>
<term>Such rules</term>
<term>Supplemental materials</term>
<term>Symbolic representation</term>
<term>Theoretical framework</term>
<term>Unstandardized regression coefficients</term>
<term>Variable specification</term>
<term>Variance inflation factor statistics</term>
<term>Verba</term>
<term>Women citizens</term>
<term>Women representatives</term>
<term>Zetterberg</term>
<term>Zetterberg gender quotas</term>
</keywords>
<keywords scheme="Wicri" type="geographic" xml:lang="fr"><term>Argentine</term>
</keywords>
<keywords scheme="Wicri" type="topic" xml:lang="fr"><term>Exécutif</term>
<term>Participation politique</term>
<term>Partis politiques</term>
<term>Représentation politique</term>
<term>Science politique</term>
<term>Politique publique</term>
<term>Démocratie représentative</term>
</keywords>
</textClass>
<langUsage><language ident="en">en</language>
</langUsage>
</profileDesc>
</teiHeader>
<front><div type="abstract" xml:lang="en">Gender quotas have been held to have more far-reaching consequences than increasing women’s political representation. Some scholars claim that they foster women’s overall political engagement. After elaborating a theoretical framework on how affirmative action policies to legislative bodies might be beneficial to constituents of the targeted group, the author tests this hypothesis on women in seventeen Latin American countries. Contrasting previous claims, the author shows that there is no general proof of attitudinal or behavioral effects. The analysis represents an initial attempt to theorize and use large-scale data to examine the more long-term consequences of quota policies on female constituents’ political involvement.</div>
</front>
</TEI>
</record>
Pour manipuler ce document sous Unix (Dilib)
EXPLOR_STEP=$WICRI_ROOT/Wicri/Santé/explor/EdenteV2/Data/Istex/Curation
HfdSelect -h $EXPLOR_STEP/biblio.hfd -nk 004836 | SxmlIndent | more
Ou
HfdSelect -h $EXPLOR_AREA/Data/Istex/Curation/biblio.hfd -nk 004836 | SxmlIndent | more
Pour mettre un lien sur cette page dans le réseau Wicri
{{Explor lien |wiki= Wicri/Santé |area= EdenteV2 |flux= Istex |étape= Curation |type= RBID |clé= ISTEX:90CF7A17AC5F15ABE4BC30566274E1E29D1CDE6E |texte= Do Gender Quotas Foster Women’s Political Engagement? }}
This area was generated with Dilib version V0.6.32. |