Discriminant analysis of patients’ reasons for choosing or refusing treatments for partial edentulism
Identifieur interne : 004797 ( Istex/Curation ); précédent : 004796; suivant : 004798Discriminant analysis of patients’ reasons for choosing or refusing treatments for partial edentulism
Auteurs : C. R. Leles ; R. R. Martins ; E. T. Silva ; M. F. Nunes [Brésil]Source :
- Journal of Oral Rehabilitation [ 0305-182X ] ; 2009-12.
Descripteurs français
- Wicri :
- topic : Analyse comparative, Situation de famille.
English descriptors
- KwdEn :
- Absolute size, Appropriate treatment, Blackwell publishing, Brazilian version, Clinical decisions, Clinical trial, Clinical trials, Common reason, Community dent, Comparative analysis, Conceptual analysis, Dent, Dental encounter, Denture, Denture construction, Discriminant, Discriminant analysis, Discriminant function, Discriminant functions, Discriminant models, Discriminant scores, Edentulous, Edentulous arch, Edentulous patients, Federal university, General health, Gingival problems, Great impact, Higher education levels, Implant, Implant therapy, Independent variables, Individualized teeth, Life impacts, Life measures, Main reason, Mandible, Mandibular, Mandibular arches, Mandibular dentures, Marital status, Maxilla, Maxilla mandible, Natural appearance, Oral quality, Oral rehabil, Oral rehabilitation, Overall agreement, Partial denture, Partial dentures, Partial edentulism, Patient satisfaction, Potential outcomes, Predictor, Predictor variables, Preferred option, Prosthesis, Prosthet dent, Prosthodont, Prosthodontic, Prosthodontic treatment, Prosthodontic treatments, Removable, Structure matrix, Successful outcomes, Tooth loss, Tooth structure, Treatment decisions, Treatment options, Treatment outcomes, Treatment preferences.
- Teeft :
- Absolute size, Appropriate treatment, Blackwell publishing, Brazilian version, Clinical decisions, Clinical trial, Clinical trials, Common reason, Community dent, Comparative analysis, Conceptual analysis, Dent, Dental encounter, Denture, Denture construction, Discriminant, Discriminant analysis, Discriminant function, Discriminant functions, Discriminant models, Discriminant scores, Edentulous, Edentulous arch, Edentulous patients, Federal university, General health, Gingival problems, Great impact, Higher education levels, Implant, Implant therapy, Independent variables, Individualized teeth, Life impacts, Life measures, Main reason, Mandible, Mandibular, Mandibular arches, Mandibular dentures, Marital status, Maxilla, Maxilla mandible, Natural appearance, Oral quality, Oral rehabil, Oral rehabilitation, Overall agreement, Partial denture, Partial dentures, Partial edentulism, Patient satisfaction, Potential outcomes, Predictor, Predictor variables, Preferred option, Prosthesis, Prosthet dent, Prosthodont, Prosthodontic, Prosthodontic treatment, Prosthodontic treatments, Removable, Structure matrix, Successful outcomes, Tooth loss, Tooth structure, Treatment decisions, Treatment options, Treatment outcomes, Treatment preferences.
Abstract
Summary The aim of the study was to explore partially edentulous patients’ reasons for choosing or refusing prosthodontic treatment with removable partial dentures (RPD), fixed partial dentures (FPD) and implant partial dentures (IPD). Clinical and oral health‐related quality of life measures were collected from 165 partially edentulous patients undergoing treatment. Patients’ preferences were recorded and reasons for choosing or refusing treatments were measured with 32 questions using a five‐point Likert scale. Descriptive statistics, chi‐square and multiple logistic regression were used to compare patients’ preferences according to clinical variables. Discriminant analysis was used to examine the impact of each reason for a patient’s decision to choose or refuse treatment options. Results showed that older patients (P < 0·001) and with greater oral‐related quality of life impacts (P < 0·05) were more likely to choose RPD. IPD were preferred by patients with higher education levels (P < 0·01). Discriminant functions revealed that the desire to have a fixed or removable denture had great impact on preferences. Removal of tooth structure was the main reason for refusing FPD and financial cost had a great impact on refusing IPD. Overall agreement between observed patients’ decisions and those predicted by the discriminant function was >90% for all treatments. Reasons vary greatly among patients, and the role of individual perception of potential reasons for treatment selection was the most important determinants of patients’ decisions. The main reasons for choosing or refusing treatments focused in this study can be used to guide shared decision‐making, providing treatments that better match patients’ expectations and desires.
Url:
DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2842.2009.02018.x
Links toward previous steps (curation, corpus...)
- to stream Istex, to step Corpus: Pour aller vers cette notice dans l'étape Curation :004797
Links to Exploration step
ISTEX:903661829620F64E8092A7B8CCA700433E38FBF6Curation
No country items
C. R. Leles<affiliation><mods:affiliation>Departments of Prevention and Oral Rehabilitation</mods:affiliation>
<wicri:noCountry code="no comma">Departments of Prevention and Oral Rehabilitation</wicri:noCountry>
</affiliation>
<affiliation><mods:affiliation>Departments of Prevention and Oral Rehabilitation</mods:affiliation>
<wicri:noCountry code="no comma">Departments of Prevention and Oral Rehabilitation</wicri:noCountry>
</affiliation>
<affiliation><mods:affiliation>Departments of Prevention and Oral Rehabilitation</mods:affiliation>
<wicri:noCountry code="no comma">Departments of Prevention and Oral Rehabilitation</wicri:noCountry>
</affiliation>
Le document en format XML
<record><TEI wicri:istexFullTextTei="biblStruct"><teiHeader><fileDesc><titleStmt><title xml:lang="en">Discriminant analysis of patients’ reasons for choosing or refusing treatments for partial edentulism</title>
<author><name sortKey="Leles, C R" sort="Leles, C R" uniqKey="Leles C" first="C. R." last="Leles">C. R. Leles</name>
<affiliation><mods:affiliation>Departments of Prevention and Oral Rehabilitation</mods:affiliation>
<wicri:noCountry code="no comma">Departments of Prevention and Oral Rehabilitation</wicri:noCountry>
</affiliation>
</author>
<author><name sortKey="Martins, R R" sort="Martins, R R" uniqKey="Martins R" first="R. R." last="Martins">R. R. Martins</name>
<affiliation><mods:affiliation>Departments of Prevention and Oral Rehabilitation</mods:affiliation>
<wicri:noCountry code="no comma">Departments of Prevention and Oral Rehabilitation</wicri:noCountry>
</affiliation>
</author>
<author><name sortKey="Silva, E T" sort="Silva, E T" uniqKey="Silva E" first="E. T." last="Silva">E. T. Silva</name>
<affiliation><mods:affiliation>Departments of Prevention and Oral Rehabilitation</mods:affiliation>
<wicri:noCountry code="no comma">Departments of Prevention and Oral Rehabilitation</wicri:noCountry>
</affiliation>
</author>
<author><name sortKey="Nunes, M F" sort="Nunes, M F" uniqKey="Nunes M" first="M. F." last="Nunes">M. F. Nunes</name>
<affiliation wicri:level="1"><mods:affiliation>Stomatological Sciences, School of Dentistry, Federal University of Goias, Goiania, Goias, Brazil</mods:affiliation>
<country xml:lang="fr">Brésil</country>
<wicri:regionArea>Stomatological Sciences, School of Dentistry, Federal University of Goias, Goiania, Goias</wicri:regionArea>
</affiliation>
</author>
</titleStmt>
<publicationStmt><idno type="wicri:source">ISTEX</idno>
<idno type="RBID">ISTEX:903661829620F64E8092A7B8CCA700433E38FBF6</idno>
<date when="2009" year="2009">2009</date>
<idno type="doi">10.1111/j.1365-2842.2009.02018.x</idno>
<idno type="url">https://api.istex.fr/document/903661829620F64E8092A7B8CCA700433E38FBF6/fulltext/pdf</idno>
<idno type="wicri:Area/Istex/Corpus">004797</idno>
<idno type="wicri:explorRef" wicri:stream="Istex" wicri:step="Corpus" wicri:corpus="ISTEX">004797</idno>
<idno type="wicri:Area/Istex/Curation">004797</idno>
</publicationStmt>
<sourceDesc><biblStruct><analytic><title level="a" type="main">Discriminant analysis of patients’ reasons for choosing or refusing treatments for partial edentulism</title>
<author><name sortKey="Leles, C R" sort="Leles, C R" uniqKey="Leles C" first="C. R." last="Leles">C. R. Leles</name>
<affiliation><mods:affiliation>Departments of Prevention and Oral Rehabilitation</mods:affiliation>
<wicri:noCountry code="no comma">Departments of Prevention and Oral Rehabilitation</wicri:noCountry>
</affiliation>
</author>
<author><name sortKey="Martins, R R" sort="Martins, R R" uniqKey="Martins R" first="R. R." last="Martins">R. R. Martins</name>
<affiliation><mods:affiliation>Departments of Prevention and Oral Rehabilitation</mods:affiliation>
<wicri:noCountry code="no comma">Departments of Prevention and Oral Rehabilitation</wicri:noCountry>
</affiliation>
</author>
<author><name sortKey="Silva, E T" sort="Silva, E T" uniqKey="Silva E" first="E. T." last="Silva">E. T. Silva</name>
<affiliation><mods:affiliation>Departments of Prevention and Oral Rehabilitation</mods:affiliation>
<wicri:noCountry code="no comma">Departments of Prevention and Oral Rehabilitation</wicri:noCountry>
</affiliation>
</author>
<author><name sortKey="Nunes, M F" sort="Nunes, M F" uniqKey="Nunes M" first="M. F." last="Nunes">M. F. Nunes</name>
<affiliation wicri:level="1"><mods:affiliation>Stomatological Sciences, School of Dentistry, Federal University of Goias, Goiania, Goias, Brazil</mods:affiliation>
<country xml:lang="fr">Brésil</country>
<wicri:regionArea>Stomatological Sciences, School of Dentistry, Federal University of Goias, Goiania, Goias</wicri:regionArea>
</affiliation>
</author>
</analytic>
<monogr></monogr>
<series><title level="j" type="main">Journal of Oral Rehabilitation</title>
<title level="j" type="alt">JOURNAL ORAL REHABILITATION</title>
<idno type="ISSN">0305-182X</idno>
<idno type="eISSN">1365-2842</idno>
<imprint><biblScope unit="vol">36</biblScope>
<biblScope unit="issue">12</biblScope>
<biblScope unit="page" from="909">909</biblScope>
<biblScope unit="page" to="915">915</biblScope>
<biblScope unit="page-count">7</biblScope>
<publisher>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</publisher>
<pubPlace>Oxford, UK</pubPlace>
<date type="published" when="2009-12">2009-12</date>
</imprint>
<idno type="ISSN">0305-182X</idno>
</series>
</biblStruct>
</sourceDesc>
<seriesStmt><idno type="ISSN">0305-182X</idno>
</seriesStmt>
</fileDesc>
<profileDesc><textClass><keywords scheme="KwdEn" xml:lang="en"><term>Absolute size</term>
<term>Appropriate treatment</term>
<term>Blackwell publishing</term>
<term>Brazilian version</term>
<term>Clinical decisions</term>
<term>Clinical trial</term>
<term>Clinical trials</term>
<term>Common reason</term>
<term>Community dent</term>
<term>Comparative analysis</term>
<term>Conceptual analysis</term>
<term>Dent</term>
<term>Dental encounter</term>
<term>Denture</term>
<term>Denture construction</term>
<term>Discriminant</term>
<term>Discriminant analysis</term>
<term>Discriminant function</term>
<term>Discriminant functions</term>
<term>Discriminant models</term>
<term>Discriminant scores</term>
<term>Edentulous</term>
<term>Edentulous arch</term>
<term>Edentulous patients</term>
<term>Federal university</term>
<term>General health</term>
<term>Gingival problems</term>
<term>Great impact</term>
<term>Higher education levels</term>
<term>Implant</term>
<term>Implant therapy</term>
<term>Independent variables</term>
<term>Individualized teeth</term>
<term>Life impacts</term>
<term>Life measures</term>
<term>Main reason</term>
<term>Mandible</term>
<term>Mandibular</term>
<term>Mandibular arches</term>
<term>Mandibular dentures</term>
<term>Marital status</term>
<term>Maxilla</term>
<term>Maxilla mandible</term>
<term>Natural appearance</term>
<term>Oral quality</term>
<term>Oral rehabil</term>
<term>Oral rehabilitation</term>
<term>Overall agreement</term>
<term>Partial denture</term>
<term>Partial dentures</term>
<term>Partial edentulism</term>
<term>Patient satisfaction</term>
<term>Potential outcomes</term>
<term>Predictor</term>
<term>Predictor variables</term>
<term>Preferred option</term>
<term>Prosthesis</term>
<term>Prosthet dent</term>
<term>Prosthodont</term>
<term>Prosthodontic</term>
<term>Prosthodontic treatment</term>
<term>Prosthodontic treatments</term>
<term>Removable</term>
<term>Structure matrix</term>
<term>Successful outcomes</term>
<term>Tooth loss</term>
<term>Tooth structure</term>
<term>Treatment decisions</term>
<term>Treatment options</term>
<term>Treatment outcomes</term>
<term>Treatment preferences</term>
</keywords>
<keywords scheme="Teeft" xml:lang="en"><term>Absolute size</term>
<term>Appropriate treatment</term>
<term>Blackwell publishing</term>
<term>Brazilian version</term>
<term>Clinical decisions</term>
<term>Clinical trial</term>
<term>Clinical trials</term>
<term>Common reason</term>
<term>Community dent</term>
<term>Comparative analysis</term>
<term>Conceptual analysis</term>
<term>Dent</term>
<term>Dental encounter</term>
<term>Denture</term>
<term>Denture construction</term>
<term>Discriminant</term>
<term>Discriminant analysis</term>
<term>Discriminant function</term>
<term>Discriminant functions</term>
<term>Discriminant models</term>
<term>Discriminant scores</term>
<term>Edentulous</term>
<term>Edentulous arch</term>
<term>Edentulous patients</term>
<term>Federal university</term>
<term>General health</term>
<term>Gingival problems</term>
<term>Great impact</term>
<term>Higher education levels</term>
<term>Implant</term>
<term>Implant therapy</term>
<term>Independent variables</term>
<term>Individualized teeth</term>
<term>Life impacts</term>
<term>Life measures</term>
<term>Main reason</term>
<term>Mandible</term>
<term>Mandibular</term>
<term>Mandibular arches</term>
<term>Mandibular dentures</term>
<term>Marital status</term>
<term>Maxilla</term>
<term>Maxilla mandible</term>
<term>Natural appearance</term>
<term>Oral quality</term>
<term>Oral rehabil</term>
<term>Oral rehabilitation</term>
<term>Overall agreement</term>
<term>Partial denture</term>
<term>Partial dentures</term>
<term>Partial edentulism</term>
<term>Patient satisfaction</term>
<term>Potential outcomes</term>
<term>Predictor</term>
<term>Predictor variables</term>
<term>Preferred option</term>
<term>Prosthesis</term>
<term>Prosthet dent</term>
<term>Prosthodont</term>
<term>Prosthodontic</term>
<term>Prosthodontic treatment</term>
<term>Prosthodontic treatments</term>
<term>Removable</term>
<term>Structure matrix</term>
<term>Successful outcomes</term>
<term>Tooth loss</term>
<term>Tooth structure</term>
<term>Treatment decisions</term>
<term>Treatment options</term>
<term>Treatment outcomes</term>
<term>Treatment preferences</term>
</keywords>
<keywords scheme="Wicri" type="topic" xml:lang="fr"><term>Analyse comparative</term>
<term>Situation de famille</term>
</keywords>
</textClass>
</profileDesc>
</teiHeader>
<front><div type="abstract">Summary The aim of the study was to explore partially edentulous patients’ reasons for choosing or refusing prosthodontic treatment with removable partial dentures (RPD), fixed partial dentures (FPD) and implant partial dentures (IPD). Clinical and oral health‐related quality of life measures were collected from 165 partially edentulous patients undergoing treatment. Patients’ preferences were recorded and reasons for choosing or refusing treatments were measured with 32 questions using a five‐point Likert scale. Descriptive statistics, chi‐square and multiple logistic regression were used to compare patients’ preferences according to clinical variables. Discriminant analysis was used to examine the impact of each reason for a patient’s decision to choose or refuse treatment options. Results showed that older patients (P < 0·001) and with greater oral‐related quality of life impacts (P < 0·05) were more likely to choose RPD. IPD were preferred by patients with higher education levels (P < 0·01). Discriminant functions revealed that the desire to have a fixed or removable denture had great impact on preferences. Removal of tooth structure was the main reason for refusing FPD and financial cost had a great impact on refusing IPD. Overall agreement between observed patients’ decisions and those predicted by the discriminant function was >90% for all treatments. Reasons vary greatly among patients, and the role of individual perception of potential reasons for treatment selection was the most important determinants of patients’ decisions. The main reasons for choosing or refusing treatments focused in this study can be used to guide shared decision‐making, providing treatments that better match patients’ expectations and desires.</div>
</front>
</TEI>
</record>
Pour manipuler ce document sous Unix (Dilib)
EXPLOR_STEP=$WICRI_ROOT/Wicri/Santé/explor/EdenteV2/Data/Istex/Curation
HfdSelect -h $EXPLOR_STEP/biblio.hfd -nk 004797 | SxmlIndent | more
Ou
HfdSelect -h $EXPLOR_AREA/Data/Istex/Curation/biblio.hfd -nk 004797 | SxmlIndent | more
Pour mettre un lien sur cette page dans le réseau Wicri
{{Explor lien |wiki= Wicri/Santé |area= EdenteV2 |flux= Istex |étape= Curation |type= RBID |clé= ISTEX:903661829620F64E8092A7B8CCA700433E38FBF6 |texte= Discriminant analysis of patients’ reasons for choosing or refusing treatments for partial edentulism }}
This area was generated with Dilib version V0.6.32. |