EdenteV2, Istex, Curation, bibRecord, 003F19

In the lion's den? Experiences of interaction with research ethics committees

Identifieur interne : 003F19 ( Istex/Curation ); précédent : 003F18; suivant : 003F20

In the lion's den? Experiences of interaction with research ethics committees

Auteurs : Elizabeth Fistein [Royaume-Uni] ; Sally Quilligan [Royaume-Uni]

Source :

Journal of Medical Ethics [ 0306-6800 ] ; 2012-04.

RBID : ISTEX:7F7ED1F46DF4FA6D4D6D02130A53B031A59C8DA1

Descripteurs français

Wicri :
- topic : Protocole.

English descriptors

Abstract

Research ethics review is an important process, designed to protect participants in medical research. However, it is increasingly criticised for failing to meet its aims. Here, two researchers reflect on their experiences of applying for ethical approval of observational research in clinical settings. They highlight some problems faced by reviewers and researchers and propose a two-stage ethical review process that would alert researchers to the committee's concerns and allow them to give a more considered response.

Url:

https://api.istex.fr/document/7F7ED1F46DF4FA6D4D6D02130A53B031A59C8DA1/fulltext/pdf

DOI: 10.1136/medethics-2011-100124

Links toward previous steps (curation, corpus...)

to stream Istex, to step Corpus: Pour aller vers cette notice dans l'étape Curation :003F19

Links to Exploration step

ISTEX:7F7ED1F46DF4FA6D4D6D02130A53B031A59C8DA1

Le document en format XML

<record><TEI wicri:istexFullTextTei="biblStruct"><teiHeader><fileDesc><titleStmt><title>In the lion's den? Experiences of interaction with research ethics committees</title>
<author><name sortKey="Fistein, Elizabeth" sort="Fistein, Elizabeth" uniqKey="Fistein E" first="Elizabeth" last="Fistein">Elizabeth Fistein</name>
<affiliation wicri:level="1"><mods:affiliation>General Practice Education Group, Institute of Public Health, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK</mods:affiliation>
<country xml:lang="fr">Royaume-Uni</country>
<wicri:regionArea>General Practice Education Group, Institute of Public Health, University of Cambridge, Cambridge</wicri:regionArea>
</affiliation>
<affiliation wicri:level="1"><mods:affiliation>E-mail: ecf22@medschl.cam.ac.uk</mods:affiliation>
<country wicri:rule="url">Royaume-Uni</country>
</affiliation>
</author>
<author><name sortKey="Quilligan, Sally" sort="Quilligan, Sally" uniqKey="Quilligan S" first="Sally" last="Quilligan">Sally Quilligan</name>
<affiliation wicri:level="1"><mods:affiliation>Office of the School of Clinical Medicine, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK</mods:affiliation>
<country xml:lang="fr">Royaume-Uni</country>
<wicri:regionArea>Office of the School of Clinical Medicine, University of Cambridge, Cambridge</wicri:regionArea>
</affiliation>
</author>
</titleStmt>
<publicationStmt><idno type="wicri:source">ISTEX</idno>
<idno type="RBID">ISTEX:7F7ED1F46DF4FA6D4D6D02130A53B031A59C8DA1</idno>
<date when="2011" year="2011">2011</date>
<idno type="doi">10.1136/medethics-2011-100124</idno>
<idno type="url">https://api.istex.fr/document/7F7ED1F46DF4FA6D4D6D02130A53B031A59C8DA1/fulltext/pdf</idno>
<idno type="wicri:Area/Istex/Corpus">003F19</idno>
<idno type="wicri:explorRef" wicri:stream="Istex" wicri:step="Corpus" wicri:corpus="ISTEX">003F19</idno>
<idno type="wicri:Area/Istex/Curation">003F19</idno>
</publicationStmt>
<sourceDesc><biblStruct><analytic><title level="a">In the lion's den? Experiences of interaction with research ethics committees</title>
<author><name sortKey="Fistein, Elizabeth" sort="Fistein, Elizabeth" uniqKey="Fistein E" first="Elizabeth" last="Fistein">Elizabeth Fistein</name>
<affiliation wicri:level="1"><mods:affiliation>General Practice Education Group, Institute of Public Health, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK</mods:affiliation>
<country xml:lang="fr">Royaume-Uni</country>
<wicri:regionArea>General Practice Education Group, Institute of Public Health, University of Cambridge, Cambridge</wicri:regionArea>
</affiliation>
<affiliation wicri:level="1"><mods:affiliation>E-mail: ecf22@medschl.cam.ac.uk</mods:affiliation>
<country wicri:rule="url">Royaume-Uni</country>
</affiliation>
</author>
<author><name sortKey="Quilligan, Sally" sort="Quilligan, Sally" uniqKey="Quilligan S" first="Sally" last="Quilligan">Sally Quilligan</name>
<affiliation wicri:level="1"><mods:affiliation>Office of the School of Clinical Medicine, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK</mods:affiliation>
<country xml:lang="fr">Royaume-Uni</country>
<wicri:regionArea>Office of the School of Clinical Medicine, University of Cambridge, Cambridge</wicri:regionArea>
</affiliation>
</author>
</analytic>
<monogr></monogr>
<series><title level="j">Journal of Medical Ethics</title>
<title level="j" type="abbrev">J Med Ethics</title>
<idno type="ISSN">0306-6800</idno>
<idno type="eISSN">1473-4257</idno>
<imprint><publisher>BMJ Publishing Group Ltd and Institute of Medical Ethics</publisher>
<date type="published" when="2012-04">2012-04</date>
<biblScope unit="volume">38</biblScope>
<biblScope unit="issue">4</biblScope>
<biblScope unit="page" from="224">224</biblScope>
</imprint>
<idno type="ISSN">0306-6800</idno>
</series>
</biblStruct>
</sourceDesc>
<seriesStmt><idno type="ISSN">0306-6800</idno>
</seriesStmt>
</fileDesc>
<profileDesc><textClass><keywords scheme="KwdEn" xml:lang="en"><term>Appointment letters</term>
<term>Clinical encounters</term>
<term>Clinical medicine</term>
<term>Committee members</term>
<term>Consent process</term>
<term>Conversation analysis</term>
<term>Ethical approval</term>
<term>Ethical research</term>
<term>Ethical review process</term>
<term>Ethics committees</term>
<term>Ethics review</term>
<term>Good practice</term>
<term>Governance arrangements</term>
<term>Information sheets</term>
<term>Institutional discourse</term>
<term>Mental capacity</term>
<term>National health service</term>
<term>National patient safety agency</term>
<term>Novice researchers</term>
<term>Observational research</term>
<term>Participant</term>
<term>Pilot study</term>
<term>Potential harm</term>
<term>Potential participants</term>
<term>Protocol</term>
<term>Research ethics committees</term>
<term>Research questions</term>
<term>Researcher</term>
<term>Service users</term>
</keywords>
<keywords scheme="Teeft" xml:lang="en"><term>Appointment letters</term>
<term>Clinical encounters</term>
<term>Clinical medicine</term>
<term>Committee members</term>
<term>Consent process</term>
<term>Conversation analysis</term>
<term>Ethical approval</term>
<term>Ethical research</term>
<term>Ethical review process</term>
<term>Ethics committees</term>
<term>Ethics review</term>
<term>Good practice</term>
<term>Governance arrangements</term>
<term>Information sheets</term>
<term>Institutional discourse</term>
<term>Mental capacity</term>
<term>National health service</term>
<term>National patient safety agency</term>
<term>Novice researchers</term>
<term>Observational research</term>
<term>Participant</term>
<term>Pilot study</term>
<term>Potential harm</term>
<term>Potential participants</term>
<term>Protocol</term>
<term>Research ethics committees</term>
<term>Research questions</term>
<term>Researcher</term>
<term>Service users</term>
</keywords>
<keywords scheme="Wicri" type="topic" xml:lang="fr"><term>Protocole</term>
</keywords>
</textClass>
<langUsage><language ident="en">en</language>
</langUsage>
</profileDesc>
</teiHeader>
<front><div type="abstract">Research ethics review is an important process, designed to protect participants in medical research. However, it is increasingly criticised for failing to meet its aims. Here, two researchers reflect on their experiences of applying for ethical approval of observational research in clinical settings. They highlight some problems faced by reviewers and researchers and propose a two-stage ethical review process that would alert researchers to the committee's concerns and allow them to give a more considered response.</div>
</front>
</TEI>
</record>

Pour manipuler ce document sous Unix (Dilib)

EXPLOR_STEP=$WICRI_ROOT/Wicri/Santé/explor/EdenteV2/Data/Istex/Curation

HfdSelect -h $EXPLOR_STEP/biblio.hfd -nk 003F19 | SxmlIndent | more

HfdSelect -h $EXPLOR_AREA/Data/Istex/Curation/biblio.hfd -nk 003F19 | SxmlIndent | more

Pour mettre un lien sur cette page dans le réseau Wicri

{{Explor lien
   |wiki=    Wicri/Santé
   |area=    EdenteV2
   |flux=    Istex
   |étape=   Curation
   |type=    RBID
   |clé=     ISTEX:7F7ED1F46DF4FA6D4D6D02130A53B031A59C8DA1
   |texte=   In the lion's den? Experiences of interaction with research ethics committees
}}

This area was generated with Dilib version V0.6.32.
Data generation: Thu Nov 30 15:26:48 2017. Site generation: Tue Mar 8 16:36:20 2022

	Serveur d'exploration sur le patient édenté
	Attention, ce site est en cours de développement ! Attention, site généré par des moyens informatiques à partir de corpus bruts. Les informations ne sont donc pas validées.

Serveur d'exploration sur le patient édenté

In the lion's den? Experiences of interaction with research ethics committees

In the lion's den? Experiences of interaction with research ethics committees

Source :

Descripteurs français

English descriptors

Abstract

Links toward previous steps (curation, corpus...)

Links to Exploration step

Le document en format XML

Pour manipuler ce document sous Unix (Dilib)

Pour mettre un lien sur cette page dans le réseau Wicri