Serveur d'exploration sur le patient édenté

Attention, ce site est en cours de développement !
Attention, site généré par des moyens informatiques à partir de corpus bruts.
Les informations ne sont donc pas validées.

The optimal degree of competition and dynamic efficiency in Japan and Korea

Identifieur interne : 003860 ( Istex/Curation ); précédent : 003859; suivant : 003861

The optimal degree of competition and dynamic efficiency in Japan and Korea

Auteurs : Alice H. Amsden [États-Unis] ; Ajit Singh [Royaume-Uni]

Source :

RBID : ISTEX:725D104876F643D83E46AB3AFD99D81A94E3CB57

Descripteurs français

English descriptors

Abstract

Abstract: This paper is concerned with the neglected role of competition policy in East Asian development. Michael Porter considers Japan's development to have benefitted from intense competition among firms. By contrast. Caves and Uekusa criticize MITI's role in creating recession cartels and entry barriers, which are thought to have resulted in allocative inefficiency. This paper argues that competition policy in both Japan and Korea was oriented towards creating dynamic efficiency (the highest long term productivity growth rate). It did so by measures, operating at both the industry and firm level, which sometimes restricted competition and sometimes encouraged it.

Url:
DOI: 10.1016/0014-2921(94)90130-9

Links toward previous steps (curation, corpus...)


Links to Exploration step

ISTEX:725D104876F643D83E46AB3AFD99D81A94E3CB57

Le document en format XML

<record>
<TEI wicri:istexFullTextTei="biblStruct">
<teiHeader>
<fileDesc>
<titleStmt>
<title>The optimal degree of competition and dynamic efficiency in Japan and Korea</title>
<author>
<name sortKey="Amsden, Alice H" sort="Amsden, Alice H" uniqKey="Amsden A" first="Alice H." last="Amsden">Alice H. Amsden</name>
<affiliation wicri:level="1">
<mods:affiliation>New School for Social Research, 66 West 12th St., New York, NY 10011, USA</mods:affiliation>
<country xml:lang="fr">États-Unis</country>
<wicri:regionArea>New School for Social Research, 66 West 12th St., New York, NY 10011</wicri:regionArea>
</affiliation>
</author>
<author>
<name sortKey="Singh, Ajit" sort="Singh, Ajit" uniqKey="Singh A" first="Ajit" last="Singh">Ajit Singh</name>
<affiliation wicri:level="1">
<mods:affiliation>Faculty of Economics, University of Cambridge, Austin Robinson Building, Sidgwick Ave., Cambridge CB3 9DD, UK</mods:affiliation>
<country xml:lang="fr">Royaume-Uni</country>
<wicri:regionArea>Faculty of Economics, University of Cambridge, Austin Robinson Building, Sidgwick Ave., Cambridge CB3 9DD</wicri:regionArea>
</affiliation>
<affiliation>
<mods:affiliation>∗ Corresponding author. We are greatly indebted to Mr. Takashi Hikino for many helpful suggestions, and for drawing our attention to important sources of data on industrial concentration in Japan. The usual disclaimer applies.</mods:affiliation>
<wicri:noCountry code="subField">applies.</wicri:noCountry>
</affiliation>
</author>
</titleStmt>
<publicationStmt>
<idno type="wicri:source">ISTEX</idno>
<idno type="RBID">ISTEX:725D104876F643D83E46AB3AFD99D81A94E3CB57</idno>
<date when="1994" year="1994">1994</date>
<idno type="doi">10.1016/0014-2921(94)90130-9</idno>
<idno type="url">https://api.istex.fr/document/725D104876F643D83E46AB3AFD99D81A94E3CB57/fulltext/pdf</idno>
<idno type="wicri:Area/Istex/Corpus">003860</idno>
<idno type="wicri:explorRef" wicri:stream="Istex" wicri:step="Corpus" wicri:corpus="ISTEX">003860</idno>
<idno type="wicri:Area/Istex/Curation">003860</idno>
</publicationStmt>
<sourceDesc>
<biblStruct>
<analytic>
<title level="a">The optimal degree of competition and dynamic efficiency in Japan and Korea</title>
<author>
<name sortKey="Amsden, Alice H" sort="Amsden, Alice H" uniqKey="Amsden A" first="Alice H." last="Amsden">Alice H. Amsden</name>
<affiliation wicri:level="1">
<mods:affiliation>New School for Social Research, 66 West 12th St., New York, NY 10011, USA</mods:affiliation>
<country xml:lang="fr">États-Unis</country>
<wicri:regionArea>New School for Social Research, 66 West 12th St., New York, NY 10011</wicri:regionArea>
</affiliation>
</author>
<author>
<name sortKey="Singh, Ajit" sort="Singh, Ajit" uniqKey="Singh A" first="Ajit" last="Singh">Ajit Singh</name>
<affiliation wicri:level="1">
<mods:affiliation>Faculty of Economics, University of Cambridge, Austin Robinson Building, Sidgwick Ave., Cambridge CB3 9DD, UK</mods:affiliation>
<country xml:lang="fr">Royaume-Uni</country>
<wicri:regionArea>Faculty of Economics, University of Cambridge, Austin Robinson Building, Sidgwick Ave., Cambridge CB3 9DD</wicri:regionArea>
</affiliation>
<affiliation>
<mods:affiliation>∗ Corresponding author. We are greatly indebted to Mr. Takashi Hikino for many helpful suggestions, and for drawing our attention to important sources of data on industrial concentration in Japan. The usual disclaimer applies.</mods:affiliation>
</affiliation>
</author>
</analytic>
<monogr></monogr>
<series>
<title level="j">European Economic Review</title>
<title level="j" type="abbrev">EER</title>
<idno type="ISSN">0014-2921</idno>
<imprint>
<publisher>ELSEVIER</publisher>
<date type="published" when="1994">1994</date>
<biblScope unit="volume">38</biblScope>
<biblScope unit="issue">3–4</biblScope>
<biblScope unit="page" from="941">941</biblScope>
<biblScope unit="page" to="951">951</biblScope>
</imprint>
<idno type="ISSN">0014-2921</idno>
</series>
</biblStruct>
</sourceDesc>
<seriesStmt>
<idno type="ISSN">0014-2921</idno>
</seriesStmt>
</fileDesc>
<profileDesc>
<textClass>
<keywords scheme="KwdEn" xml:lang="en">
<term>Administrative guidance</term>
<term>Aggregate concentration</term>
<term>Amsden</term>
<term>Antitrust</term>
<term>Antitrust bulletin</term>
<term>Antitrust enforcement</term>
<term>Antitrust laws</term>
<term>Apparent paradox</term>
<term>Business groups</term>
<term>Cambridge university press</term>
<term>Cartel</term>
<term>Competition policy</term>
<term>Competitive advantage</term>
<term>Concentration ratios</term>
<term>Conventional paradigm</term>
<term>Domestic competition</term>
<term>Dynamic efficiency</term>
<term>East asian development</term>
<term>Economic analysis</term>
<term>Economic development</term>
<term>Economic growth</term>
<term>Economic openness</term>
<term>Fair trade commission</term>
<term>Foreign competition</term>
<term>Game theoretic models</term>
<term>General trading company</term>
<term>High growth period</term>
<term>High rates</term>
<term>Industrial concentration</term>
<term>Industrial organisation</term>
<term>Industrial organization</term>
<term>Industrial policies</term>
<term>Industrial policy</term>
<term>International competitiveness</term>
<term>International trade</term>
<term>Japanese companies</term>
<term>Japanese economy</term>
<term>Japanese experience</term>
<term>Japanese firms</term>
<term>Japanese government</term>
<term>Korean automobile industry</term>
<term>Korean case</term>
<term>Korean government</term>
<term>Large firms</term>
<term>Largest manufacturing firms</term>
<term>Machine tools</term>
<term>Market competition</term>
<term>Maximum competition</term>
<term>Michael porter</term>
<term>Miracle years</term>
<term>Mit1</term>
<term>Oligopolistic rivalry</term>
<term>Optimal degree</term>
<term>Oxford university press</term>
<term>Performance standards</term>
<term>Plausible capitalism</term>
<term>Rapid growth</term>
<term>Singh</term>
<term>Small firms</term>
<term>Static allocative efficiency</term>
<term>Successful combination</term>
<term>Takashi hikino</term>
<term>Technical change</term>
<term>Technological progress</term>
<term>Trade policy</term>
<term>Uekusa</term>
<term>Unfettered competition</term>
<term>World bank</term>
<term>World development report</term>
</keywords>
<keywords scheme="Teeft" xml:lang="en">
<term>Administrative guidance</term>
<term>Aggregate concentration</term>
<term>Amsden</term>
<term>Antitrust</term>
<term>Antitrust bulletin</term>
<term>Antitrust enforcement</term>
<term>Antitrust laws</term>
<term>Apparent paradox</term>
<term>Business groups</term>
<term>Cambridge university press</term>
<term>Cartel</term>
<term>Competition policy</term>
<term>Competitive advantage</term>
<term>Concentration ratios</term>
<term>Conventional paradigm</term>
<term>Domestic competition</term>
<term>Dynamic efficiency</term>
<term>East asian development</term>
<term>Economic analysis</term>
<term>Economic development</term>
<term>Economic growth</term>
<term>Economic openness</term>
<term>Fair trade commission</term>
<term>Foreign competition</term>
<term>Game theoretic models</term>
<term>General trading company</term>
<term>High growth period</term>
<term>High rates</term>
<term>Industrial concentration</term>
<term>Industrial organisation</term>
<term>Industrial organization</term>
<term>Industrial policies</term>
<term>Industrial policy</term>
<term>International competitiveness</term>
<term>International trade</term>
<term>Japanese companies</term>
<term>Japanese economy</term>
<term>Japanese experience</term>
<term>Japanese firms</term>
<term>Japanese government</term>
<term>Korean automobile industry</term>
<term>Korean case</term>
<term>Korean government</term>
<term>Large firms</term>
<term>Largest manufacturing firms</term>
<term>Machine tools</term>
<term>Market competition</term>
<term>Maximum competition</term>
<term>Michael porter</term>
<term>Miracle years</term>
<term>Mit1</term>
<term>Oligopolistic rivalry</term>
<term>Optimal degree</term>
<term>Oxford university press</term>
<term>Performance standards</term>
<term>Plausible capitalism</term>
<term>Rapid growth</term>
<term>Singh</term>
<term>Small firms</term>
<term>Static allocative efficiency</term>
<term>Successful combination</term>
<term>Takashi hikino</term>
<term>Technical change</term>
<term>Technological progress</term>
<term>Trade policy</term>
<term>Uekusa</term>
<term>Unfettered competition</term>
<term>World bank</term>
<term>World development report</term>
</keywords>
<keywords scheme="Wicri" type="topic" xml:lang="fr">
<term>Cartel</term>
<term>Politique de la concurrence</term>
<term>Analyse économique</term>
<term>Développement économique</term>
<term>Croissance économique</term>
<term>Concentration industrielle</term>
<term>Politique industrielle</term>
<term>Commerce international</term>
<term>Politique commerciale</term>
</keywords>
</textClass>
<langUsage>
<language ident="en">en</language>
</langUsage>
</profileDesc>
</teiHeader>
<front>
<div type="abstract" xml:lang="en">Abstract: This paper is concerned with the neglected role of competition policy in East Asian development. Michael Porter considers Japan's development to have benefitted from intense competition among firms. By contrast. Caves and Uekusa criticize MITI's role in creating recession cartels and entry barriers, which are thought to have resulted in allocative inefficiency. This paper argues that competition policy in both Japan and Korea was oriented towards creating dynamic efficiency (the highest long term productivity growth rate). It did so by measures, operating at both the industry and firm level, which sometimes restricted competition and sometimes encouraged it.</div>
</front>
</TEI>
</record>

Pour manipuler ce document sous Unix (Dilib)

EXPLOR_STEP=$WICRI_ROOT/Wicri/Santé/explor/EdenteV2/Data/Istex/Curation
HfdSelect -h $EXPLOR_STEP/biblio.hfd -nk 003860 | SxmlIndent | more

Ou

HfdSelect -h $EXPLOR_AREA/Data/Istex/Curation/biblio.hfd -nk 003860 | SxmlIndent | more

Pour mettre un lien sur cette page dans le réseau Wicri

{{Explor lien
   |wiki=    Wicri/Santé
   |area=    EdenteV2
   |flux=    Istex
   |étape=   Curation
   |type=    RBID
   |clé=     ISTEX:725D104876F643D83E46AB3AFD99D81A94E3CB57
   |texte=   The optimal degree of competition and dynamic efficiency in Japan and Korea
}}

Wicri

This area was generated with Dilib version V0.6.32.
Data generation: Thu Nov 30 15:26:48 2017. Site generation: Tue Mar 8 16:36:20 2022