Implant‐retained mandibular overdentures compared with complete dentures; a 5‐years' follow‐up study of clinical aspects and patient satisfaction
Identifieur interne : 003405 ( Istex/Curation ); précédent : 003404; suivant : 003406Implant‐retained mandibular overdentures compared with complete dentures; a 5‐years' follow‐up study of clinical aspects and patient satisfaction
Auteurs : Henny J. A. Meijer [Pays-Bas] ; Gerry M. Raghoebar [Pays-Bas] ; Martin A. Van'T Hof [Pays-Bas] ; Mariëlle E. Geertman [Pays-Bas] ; Robert P. Van Oort [Pays-Bas]Source :
- Clinical Oral Implants Research [ 0905-7161 ] ; 1999-06.
Abstract
The aim of this prospective randomized controlled clinical trial was to evaluate and compare clinical aspects and satisfaction during the first year following treatment and consecutively the change in treatment during the next 4 years of follow‐up. Patients were allocated to one of the following treatment modalities: an implant‐retained overdenture (IRO‐group, 2 endosseous implants, n=61) or a complete denture (CD‐group, n=60). One year after placement of the denture, unsatisfied patients of the CD‐group got the opportunity for a retreatment including an implant‐retained overdenture. In the IRO‐group 4 implants were lost during the first year and again 4 implants were lost during the next 4 years (survival rate: 93%). All patients could be re‐operated successfully. In the CD‐group 14 patients (23%) chose an implant‐retained overdenture after 1 year. Patients of the IRO‐group were significantly more satisfied than patients of the CD‐group after 1 year (satisfaction score 8.3 versus 6.6, scale l–10) and after 5 years (7.4 versus 6.4). From this study it can be concluded that endosseous implants have a high survival rate after 5‐years' follow‐up. Satisfaction score of the IRO‐group is diminishing in time, probably because patients get used to an improved situation. After 5 years, the mean satisfaction score of the CD‐group (including patients who got implants) was still lower than of the IRO‐group, in spite of the opportunity to a retreatment and have implant‐retained overdentures.
Url:
DOI: 10.1034/j.1600-0501.1999.100307.x
Links toward previous steps (curation, corpus...)
- to stream Istex, to step Corpus: Pour aller vers cette notice dans l'étape Curation :003405
Links to Exploration step
ISTEX:692A753C1F760944973625CA9BC479CB0FBA4DA6Le document en format XML
<record><TEI wicri:istexFullTextTei="biblStruct"><teiHeader><fileDesc><titleStmt><title xml:lang="en">Implant‐retained mandibular overdentures compared with complete dentures; a 5‐years' follow‐up study of clinical aspects and patient satisfaction</title>
<author><name sortKey="Meijer, Henny J A" sort="Meijer, Henny J A" uniqKey="Meijer H" first="Henny J. A." last="Meijer">Henny J. A. Meijer</name>
<affiliation wicri:level="1"><mods:affiliation>Department of Oral‐Maxillofacial Surgery and Maxillofacial Prosthodontics, University Hospital Groningen, the Netherlands;</mods:affiliation>
<country xml:lang="fr" wicri:curation="lc">Pays-Bas</country>
<wicri:regionArea>Department of Oral‐Maxillofacial Surgery and Maxillofacial Prosthodontics, University Hospital Groningen</wicri:regionArea>
</affiliation>
</author>
<author><name sortKey="Raghoebar, Gerry M" sort="Raghoebar, Gerry M" uniqKey="Raghoebar G" first="Gerry M." last="Raghoebar">Gerry M. Raghoebar</name>
<affiliation wicri:level="1"><mods:affiliation>Department of Oral‐Maxillofacial Surgery and Maxillofacial Prosthodontics, University Hospital Groningen, the Netherlands;</mods:affiliation>
<country xml:lang="fr" wicri:curation="lc">Pays-Bas</country>
<wicri:regionArea>Department of Oral‐Maxillofacial Surgery and Maxillofacial Prosthodontics, University Hospital Groningen</wicri:regionArea>
</affiliation>
</author>
<author><name sortKey="Van T Hof, Martin A" sort="Van T Hof, Martin A" uniqKey="Van T Hof M" first="Martin A." last="Van'T Hof">Martin A. Van'T Hof</name>
<affiliation wicri:level="1"><mods:affiliation>Department of Medical Statistics, University of Nijmegen. the Netherlands;</mods:affiliation>
<country xml:lang="fr" wicri:curation="lc">Pays-Bas</country>
<wicri:regionArea>Department of Medical Statistics</wicri:regionArea>
</affiliation>
</author>
<author><name sortKey="Geertman, Marielle E" sort="Geertman, Marielle E" uniqKey="Geertman M" first="Mariëlle E." last="Geertman">Mariëlle E. Geertman</name>
<affiliation wicri:level="1"><mods:affiliation>3Depaitment of Oral Function and Prosthetic Dentistry University of Nijmegen, the Netherlands</mods:affiliation>
<country xml:lang="fr" wicri:curation="lc">Pays-Bas</country>
<wicri:regionArea>3Depaitment of Oral Function and Prosthetic Dentistry University of Nijmegen</wicri:regionArea>
</affiliation>
</author>
<author><name sortKey="Van Oort, Robert P" sort="Van Oort, Robert P" uniqKey="Van Oort R" first="Robert P." last="Van Oort">Robert P. Van Oort</name>
<affiliation wicri:level="1"><mods:affiliation>Department of Oral‐Maxillofacial Surgery and Maxillofacial Prosthodontics, University Hospital Groningen, the Netherlands;</mods:affiliation>
<country xml:lang="fr" wicri:curation="lc">Pays-Bas</country>
<wicri:regionArea>Department of Oral‐Maxillofacial Surgery and Maxillofacial Prosthodontics, University Hospital Groningen</wicri:regionArea>
</affiliation>
</author>
</titleStmt>
<publicationStmt><idno type="wicri:source">ISTEX</idno>
<idno type="RBID">ISTEX:692A753C1F760944973625CA9BC479CB0FBA4DA6</idno>
<date when="1999" year="1999">1999</date>
<idno type="doi">10.1034/j.1600-0501.1999.100307.x</idno>
<idno type="url">https://api.istex.fr/document/692A753C1F760944973625CA9BC479CB0FBA4DA6/fulltext/pdf</idno>
<idno type="wicri:Area/Istex/Corpus">003405</idno>
<idno type="wicri:explorRef" wicri:stream="Istex" wicri:step="Corpus" wicri:corpus="ISTEX">003405</idno>
<idno type="wicri:Area/Istex/Curation">003405</idno>
</publicationStmt>
<sourceDesc><biblStruct><analytic><title level="a" type="main">Implant‐retained mandibular overdentures compared with complete dentures; a 5‐years' follow‐up study of clinical aspects and patient satisfaction</title>
<author><name sortKey="Meijer, Henny J A" sort="Meijer, Henny J A" uniqKey="Meijer H" first="Henny J. A." last="Meijer">Henny J. A. Meijer</name>
<affiliation wicri:level="1"><mods:affiliation>Department of Oral‐Maxillofacial Surgery and Maxillofacial Prosthodontics, University Hospital Groningen, the Netherlands;</mods:affiliation>
<country xml:lang="fr" wicri:curation="lc">Pays-Bas</country>
<wicri:regionArea>Department of Oral‐Maxillofacial Surgery and Maxillofacial Prosthodontics, University Hospital Groningen</wicri:regionArea>
</affiliation>
</author>
<author><name sortKey="Raghoebar, Gerry M" sort="Raghoebar, Gerry M" uniqKey="Raghoebar G" first="Gerry M." last="Raghoebar">Gerry M. Raghoebar</name>
<affiliation wicri:level="1"><mods:affiliation>Department of Oral‐Maxillofacial Surgery and Maxillofacial Prosthodontics, University Hospital Groningen, the Netherlands;</mods:affiliation>
<country xml:lang="fr" wicri:curation="lc">Pays-Bas</country>
<wicri:regionArea>Department of Oral‐Maxillofacial Surgery and Maxillofacial Prosthodontics, University Hospital Groningen</wicri:regionArea>
</affiliation>
</author>
<author><name sortKey="Van T Hof, Martin A" sort="Van T Hof, Martin A" uniqKey="Van T Hof M" first="Martin A." last="Van'T Hof">Martin A. Van'T Hof</name>
<affiliation wicri:level="1"><mods:affiliation>Department of Medical Statistics, University of Nijmegen. the Netherlands;</mods:affiliation>
<country xml:lang="fr" wicri:curation="lc">Pays-Bas</country>
<wicri:regionArea>Department of Medical Statistics</wicri:regionArea>
</affiliation>
</author>
<author><name sortKey="Geertman, Marielle E" sort="Geertman, Marielle E" uniqKey="Geertman M" first="Mariëlle E." last="Geertman">Mariëlle E. Geertman</name>
<affiliation wicri:level="1"><mods:affiliation>3Depaitment of Oral Function and Prosthetic Dentistry University of Nijmegen, the Netherlands</mods:affiliation>
<country xml:lang="fr" wicri:curation="lc">Pays-Bas</country>
<wicri:regionArea>3Depaitment of Oral Function and Prosthetic Dentistry University of Nijmegen</wicri:regionArea>
</affiliation>
</author>
<author><name sortKey="Van Oort, Robert P" sort="Van Oort, Robert P" uniqKey="Van Oort R" first="Robert P." last="Van Oort">Robert P. Van Oort</name>
<affiliation wicri:level="1"><mods:affiliation>Department of Oral‐Maxillofacial Surgery and Maxillofacial Prosthodontics, University Hospital Groningen, the Netherlands;</mods:affiliation>
<country xml:lang="fr" wicri:curation="lc">Pays-Bas</country>
<wicri:regionArea>Department of Oral‐Maxillofacial Surgery and Maxillofacial Prosthodontics, University Hospital Groningen</wicri:regionArea>
</affiliation>
</author>
</analytic>
<monogr></monogr>
<series><title level="j" type="main">Clinical Oral Implants Research</title>
<title level="j" type="alt">CLINICAL ORAL IMPLANTS RESEARCH</title>
<idno type="ISSN">0905-7161</idno>
<idno type="eISSN">1600-0501</idno>
<imprint><biblScope unit="vol">10</biblScope>
<biblScope unit="issue">3</biblScope>
<biblScope unit="page" from="238">238</biblScope>
<biblScope unit="page" to="244">244</biblScope>
<publisher>Munksgaard International Publishers</publisher>
<pubPlace>Copenhagen</pubPlace>
<date type="published" when="1999-06">1999-06</date>
</imprint>
<idno type="ISSN">0905-7161</idno>
</series>
</biblStruct>
</sourceDesc>
<seriesStmt><idno type="ISSN">0905-7161</idno>
</seriesStmt>
</fileDesc>
<profileDesc><textClass></textClass>
</profileDesc>
</teiHeader>
<front><div type="abstract" xml:lang="en">The aim of this prospective randomized controlled clinical trial was to evaluate and compare clinical aspects and satisfaction during the first year following treatment and consecutively the change in treatment during the next 4 years of follow‐up. Patients were allocated to one of the following treatment modalities: an implant‐retained overdenture (IRO‐group, 2 endosseous implants, n=61) or a complete denture (CD‐group, n=60). One year after placement of the denture, unsatisfied patients of the CD‐group got the opportunity for a retreatment including an implant‐retained overdenture. In the IRO‐group 4 implants were lost during the first year and again 4 implants were lost during the next 4 years (survival rate: 93%). All patients could be re‐operated successfully. In the CD‐group 14 patients (23%) chose an implant‐retained overdenture after 1 year. Patients of the IRO‐group were significantly more satisfied than patients of the CD‐group after 1 year (satisfaction score 8.3 versus 6.6, scale l–10) and after 5 years (7.4 versus 6.4). From this study it can be concluded that endosseous implants have a high survival rate after 5‐years' follow‐up. Satisfaction score of the IRO‐group is diminishing in time, probably because patients get used to an improved situation. After 5 years, the mean satisfaction score of the CD‐group (including patients who got implants) was still lower than of the IRO‐group, in spite of the opportunity to a retreatment and have implant‐retained overdentures.</div>
</front>
</TEI>
</record>
Pour manipuler ce document sous Unix (Dilib)
EXPLOR_STEP=$WICRI_ROOT/Wicri/Santé/explor/EdenteV2/Data/Istex/Curation
HfdSelect -h $EXPLOR_STEP/biblio.hfd -nk 003405 | SxmlIndent | more
Ou
HfdSelect -h $EXPLOR_AREA/Data/Istex/Curation/biblio.hfd -nk 003405 | SxmlIndent | more
Pour mettre un lien sur cette page dans le réseau Wicri
{{Explor lien |wiki= Wicri/Santé |area= EdenteV2 |flux= Istex |étape= Curation |type= RBID |clé= ISTEX:692A753C1F760944973625CA9BC479CB0FBA4DA6 |texte= Implant‐retained mandibular overdentures compared with complete dentures; a 5‐years' follow‐up study of clinical aspects and patient satisfaction }}
![]() | This area was generated with Dilib version V0.6.32. | ![]() |