World view: Not by experts alone
Identifieur interne : 001316 ( Istex/Curation ); précédent : 001315; suivant : 001317World view: Not by experts alone
Auteurs : Daniel SarewitzSource :
- Nature [ 0028-0836 ] ; 2010-08-05.
Descripteurs français
- Wicri :
English descriptors
- KwdEn :
- Agrarian cultures, Aids patients, Arizona state university, Best thing, Better choices, Bush radi, Complex technology, Conspicuous groups, Daniel sarewitz, Designer pathogens, Development enterprise, Early efforts, Energy policy, English sheep farmers, Ethics panel, Faustian bargain, Federal research budget, Fossil fuels, General movement, Global warming, Good signal, Government accountability office, Government laboratories, Green revolution, Human subjects, Innovating species, Innovation fuelled, Logical futures, Macmillan publishers, Many scientists, Medical research programmes, Ment research programmes, More columns, More inclu, More paths, Nanotechnology revolution, National commission, Nological frontier, Nuclear annihilation, Nuclear power, Nuclear waste, Open talks, Other countries, Other speakers, Painful progress, Past decade, Past frontier, Poisoning soil, Potential downsides, Power plant, President barack obama, President bioethics panel, President george, Presidential commis, Public deliberation, Public discussions, Public funding, Public involvement, Reactor disas, Regulatory regimes, Research laboratories, Research universi, Right direction, Safe disposal, Science museums, Scientific approaches, Second world, Single patient, Sive discussions, Small tithe, Social benefits, Social implications, Social outcomes, Standard hype, Stark contrast, Synthetic biofuels, Synthetic biology, Technological change, Troubling question, Vicious debate, Wealth creation, Whole nanotechnology programme, Wider range, Worst effects.
- Teeft :
- Agrarian cultures, Aids patients, Arizona state university, Best thing, Better choices, Bush radi, Complex technology, Conspicuous groups, Daniel sarewitz, Designer pathogens, Development enterprise, Early efforts, Energy policy, English sheep farmers, Ethics panel, Faustian bargain, Federal research budget, Fossil fuels, General movement, Global warming, Good signal, Government accountability office, Government laboratories, Green revolution, Human subjects, Innovating species, Innovation fuelled, Logical futures, Macmillan publishers, Many scientists, Medical research programmes, Ment research programmes, More columns, More inclu, More paths, Nanotechnology revolution, National commission, Nological frontier, Nuclear annihilation, Nuclear power, Nuclear waste, Open talks, Other countries, Other speakers, Painful progress, Past decade, Past frontier, Poisoning soil, Potential downsides, Power plant, President barack obama, President bioethics panel, President george, Presidential commis, Public deliberation, Public discussions, Public funding, Public involvement, Reactor disas, Regulatory regimes, Research laboratories, Research universi, Right direction, Safe disposal, Science museums, Scientific approaches, Second world, Single patient, Sive discussions, Small tithe, Social benefits, Social implications, Social outcomes, Standard hype, Stark contrast, Synthetic biofuels, Synthetic biology, Technological change, Troubling question, Vicious debate, Wealth creation, Whole nanotechnology programme, Wider range, Worst effects.
Abstract
More and earlier public involvement is required to steer powerful new technologies wisely, says Daniel Sarewitz.
Url:
DOI: 10.1038/466688a
Links toward previous steps (curation, corpus...)
- to stream Istex, to step Corpus: Pour aller vers cette notice dans l'étape Curation :001316
Links to Exploration step
ISTEX:270ED2E3CDFD62B66F2FFF830FDC3C551CA6FF8FLe document en format XML
<record><TEI wicri:istexFullTextTei="biblStruct"><teiHeader><fileDesc><titleStmt><title xml:lang="en">World view: Not by experts alone</title>
<author><name sortKey="Sarewitz, Daniel" sort="Sarewitz, Daniel" uniqKey="Sarewitz D" first="Daniel" last="Sarewitz">Daniel Sarewitz</name>
</author>
</titleStmt>
<publicationStmt><idno type="wicri:source">ISTEX</idno>
<idno type="RBID">ISTEX:270ED2E3CDFD62B66F2FFF830FDC3C551CA6FF8F</idno>
<date when="2010" year="2010">2010</date>
<idno type="doi">10.1038/466688a</idno>
<idno type="url">https://api.istex.fr/document/270ED2E3CDFD62B66F2FFF830FDC3C551CA6FF8F/fulltext/pdf</idno>
<idno type="wicri:Area/Istex/Corpus">001316</idno>
<idno type="wicri:explorRef" wicri:stream="Istex" wicri:step="Corpus" wicri:corpus="ISTEX">001316</idno>
<idno type="wicri:Area/Istex/Curation">001316</idno>
</publicationStmt>
<sourceDesc><biblStruct><analytic><title level="a" type="main" xml:lang="en">World view: Not by experts alone</title>
<author><name sortKey="Sarewitz, Daniel" sort="Sarewitz, Daniel" uniqKey="Sarewitz D" first="Daniel" last="Sarewitz">Daniel Sarewitz</name>
</author>
</analytic>
<monogr></monogr>
<series><title level="j">Nature</title>
<idno type="ISSN">0028-0836</idno>
<idno type="eISSN">1476-4687</idno>
<imprint><publisher>Nature Publishing Group</publisher>
<date type="published" when="2010-08-05">2010-08-05</date>
<biblScope unit="volume">466</biblScope>
<biblScope unit="issue">7307</biblScope>
<biblScope unit="page" from="688">688</biblScope>
<biblScope unit="page" to="688">688</biblScope>
</imprint>
<idno type="ISSN">0028-0836</idno>
</series>
</biblStruct>
</sourceDesc>
<seriesStmt><idno type="ISSN">0028-0836</idno>
</seriesStmt>
</fileDesc>
<profileDesc><textClass><keywords scheme="KwdEn" xml:lang="en"><term>Agrarian cultures</term>
<term>Aids patients</term>
<term>Arizona state university</term>
<term>Best thing</term>
<term>Better choices</term>
<term>Bush radi</term>
<term>Complex technology</term>
<term>Conspicuous groups</term>
<term>Daniel sarewitz</term>
<term>Designer pathogens</term>
<term>Development enterprise</term>
<term>Early efforts</term>
<term>Energy policy</term>
<term>English sheep farmers</term>
<term>Ethics panel</term>
<term>Faustian bargain</term>
<term>Federal research budget</term>
<term>Fossil fuels</term>
<term>General movement</term>
<term>Global warming</term>
<term>Good signal</term>
<term>Government accountability office</term>
<term>Government laboratories</term>
<term>Green revolution</term>
<term>Human subjects</term>
<term>Innovating species</term>
<term>Innovation fuelled</term>
<term>Logical futures</term>
<term>Macmillan publishers</term>
<term>Many scientists</term>
<term>Medical research programmes</term>
<term>Ment research programmes</term>
<term>More columns</term>
<term>More inclu</term>
<term>More paths</term>
<term>Nanotechnology revolution</term>
<term>National commission</term>
<term>Nological frontier</term>
<term>Nuclear annihilation</term>
<term>Nuclear power</term>
<term>Nuclear waste</term>
<term>Open talks</term>
<term>Other countries</term>
<term>Other speakers</term>
<term>Painful progress</term>
<term>Past decade</term>
<term>Past frontier</term>
<term>Poisoning soil</term>
<term>Potential downsides</term>
<term>Power plant</term>
<term>President barack obama</term>
<term>President bioethics panel</term>
<term>President george</term>
<term>Presidential commis</term>
<term>Public deliberation</term>
<term>Public discussions</term>
<term>Public funding</term>
<term>Public involvement</term>
<term>Reactor disas</term>
<term>Regulatory regimes</term>
<term>Research laboratories</term>
<term>Research universi</term>
<term>Right direction</term>
<term>Safe disposal</term>
<term>Science museums</term>
<term>Scientific approaches</term>
<term>Second world</term>
<term>Single patient</term>
<term>Sive discussions</term>
<term>Small tithe</term>
<term>Social benefits</term>
<term>Social implications</term>
<term>Social outcomes</term>
<term>Standard hype</term>
<term>Stark contrast</term>
<term>Synthetic biofuels</term>
<term>Synthetic biology</term>
<term>Technological change</term>
<term>Troubling question</term>
<term>Vicious debate</term>
<term>Wealth creation</term>
<term>Whole nanotechnology programme</term>
<term>Wider range</term>
<term>Worst effects</term>
</keywords>
<keywords scheme="Teeft" xml:lang="en"><term>Agrarian cultures</term>
<term>Aids patients</term>
<term>Arizona state university</term>
<term>Best thing</term>
<term>Better choices</term>
<term>Bush radi</term>
<term>Complex technology</term>
<term>Conspicuous groups</term>
<term>Daniel sarewitz</term>
<term>Designer pathogens</term>
<term>Development enterprise</term>
<term>Early efforts</term>
<term>Energy policy</term>
<term>English sheep farmers</term>
<term>Ethics panel</term>
<term>Faustian bargain</term>
<term>Federal research budget</term>
<term>Fossil fuels</term>
<term>General movement</term>
<term>Global warming</term>
<term>Good signal</term>
<term>Government accountability office</term>
<term>Government laboratories</term>
<term>Green revolution</term>
<term>Human subjects</term>
<term>Innovating species</term>
<term>Innovation fuelled</term>
<term>Logical futures</term>
<term>Macmillan publishers</term>
<term>Many scientists</term>
<term>Medical research programmes</term>
<term>Ment research programmes</term>
<term>More columns</term>
<term>More inclu</term>
<term>More paths</term>
<term>Nanotechnology revolution</term>
<term>National commission</term>
<term>Nological frontier</term>
<term>Nuclear annihilation</term>
<term>Nuclear power</term>
<term>Nuclear waste</term>
<term>Open talks</term>
<term>Other countries</term>
<term>Other speakers</term>
<term>Painful progress</term>
<term>Past decade</term>
<term>Past frontier</term>
<term>Poisoning soil</term>
<term>Potential downsides</term>
<term>Power plant</term>
<term>President barack obama</term>
<term>President bioethics panel</term>
<term>President george</term>
<term>Presidential commis</term>
<term>Public deliberation</term>
<term>Public discussions</term>
<term>Public funding</term>
<term>Public involvement</term>
<term>Reactor disas</term>
<term>Regulatory regimes</term>
<term>Research laboratories</term>
<term>Research universi</term>
<term>Right direction</term>
<term>Safe disposal</term>
<term>Science museums</term>
<term>Scientific approaches</term>
<term>Second world</term>
<term>Single patient</term>
<term>Sive discussions</term>
<term>Small tithe</term>
<term>Social benefits</term>
<term>Social implications</term>
<term>Social outcomes</term>
<term>Standard hype</term>
<term>Stark contrast</term>
<term>Synthetic biofuels</term>
<term>Synthetic biology</term>
<term>Technological change</term>
<term>Troubling question</term>
<term>Vicious debate</term>
<term>Wealth creation</term>
<term>Whole nanotechnology programme</term>
<term>Wider range</term>
<term>Worst effects</term>
</keywords>
<keywords scheme="Wicri" type="topic" xml:lang="fr"><term>Politique énergétique</term>
<term>Réchauffement climatique</term>
<term>Station énergétique</term>
<term>Changement technologique</term>
</keywords>
</textClass>
<langUsage><language ident="en">en</language>
</langUsage>
</profileDesc>
</teiHeader>
<front><div type="abstract" xml:lang="eng">More and earlier public involvement is required to steer powerful new technologies wisely, says Daniel Sarewitz.</div>
</front>
</TEI>
</record>
Pour manipuler ce document sous Unix (Dilib)
EXPLOR_STEP=$WICRI_ROOT/Wicri/Santé/explor/EdenteV2/Data/Istex/Curation
HfdSelect -h $EXPLOR_STEP/biblio.hfd -nk 001316 | SxmlIndent | more
Ou
HfdSelect -h $EXPLOR_AREA/Data/Istex/Curation/biblio.hfd -nk 001316 | SxmlIndent | more
Pour mettre un lien sur cette page dans le réseau Wicri
{{Explor lien |wiki= Wicri/Santé |area= EdenteV2 |flux= Istex |étape= Curation |type= RBID |clé= ISTEX:270ED2E3CDFD62B66F2FFF830FDC3C551CA6FF8F |texte= World view: Not by experts alone }}
This area was generated with Dilib version V0.6.32. |