The Role of Science in Environmental Regimes: The Case of LRTAP
Identifieur interne : 000C73 ( Istex/Curation ); précédent : 000C72; suivant : 000C74The Role of Science in Environmental Regimes: The Case of LRTAP
Auteurs : Rolf Lidskog [Suède] ; Göran Sundqvist [Suède]Source :
- European journal of international relations [ 1354-0661 ] ; 2002-03.
Descripteurs français
- Wicri :
English descriptors
- KwdEn :
- Acid rain, Airborne pollutants, Behavioral mechanisms, Boundary object, Boundary objects, Boundary work, Cambridge university press, Case study, Causal connections, Chicago press, Climate change, Conceptual lenses, Consensual, Consensual knowledge, Convergent state policies, Cornell university press, Cosmopolitan democracy, Critical loads, Critical loads approach, Critical loads concept, Deeper understanding, Different institutions, Discursive democracy, Effective regimes, Emep, Emep programme, Enrp discussion paper kennedy school, Environmental, Environmental governance, Environmental issues, Environmental policy, Environmental problems, Environmental protection, Environmental regimes, Epistemic, Epistemic communities, Epistemic community, Epistemic community approach, Epistemic community model, European journal, Explanatory power, Factual evidence, Global, Global economy, Good example, Governance, Grant college, Haas, Harvard university, Harvard university press, Human environment, Human health, Important factor, Important role, Institutional approach, Institutional model, Institutionalism, Institutionalists, International cooperation, International governance, International organization haas, International policy coordination, International regimes, International relations, Jasanoff, Latour, Lidskog, Lidskog sundqvist, Lrtap, Lrtap convention, Lrtap regime, Many cases, Many scholars, Monitoring programme, Move science, Natural ecosystems, Nitrogen oxides, Other hand, Oxford university press, Ozone layer, Pivotal role, Policy context, Policy process, Policy work, Political calculations, Political community, Political cooperation, Political interests, Political negotiations, Political order, Political parties, Polity press, Pollutant, Pollution, Power relations, Programme, Protocol, Rains model, Regime, Regime analysis, Regime analysts, Regime effectiveness, Regime formation, Regime theory, Same time, Shape regimes, Sheila jasanoff, Social conditions, Social order, Social project, Social scientists, Social studies, Soviet union, Sulphur dioxide, Sulphur emissions, Sundqvist, Support cooperation, Sustainable society, Transboundary, Transboundary fluxes, Uncritical view, Unece, Urban environment, Vandeveer, Wettestad, Widespread idea, World government, World order, World politics.
- Teeft :
- Acid rain, Airborne pollutants, Behavioral mechanisms, Boundary object, Boundary objects, Boundary work, Cambridge university press, Case study, Causal connections, Chicago press, Climate change, Conceptual lenses, Consensual, Consensual knowledge, Convergent state policies, Cornell university press, Cosmopolitan democracy, Critical loads, Critical loads approach, Critical loads concept, Deeper understanding, Different institutions, Discursive democracy, Effective regimes, Emep, Emep programme, Enrp discussion paper kennedy school, Environmental, Environmental governance, Environmental issues, Environmental policy, Environmental problems, Environmental protection, Environmental regimes, Epistemic, Epistemic communities, Epistemic community, Epistemic community approach, Epistemic community model, European journal, Explanatory power, Factual evidence, Global, Global economy, Good example, Governance, Grant college, Haas, Harvard university, Harvard university press, Human environment, Human health, Important factor, Important role, Institutional approach, Institutional model, Institutionalism, Institutionalists, International cooperation, International governance, International organization haas, International policy coordination, International regimes, International relations, Jasanoff, Latour, Lidskog, Lidskog sundqvist, Lrtap, Lrtap convention, Lrtap regime, Many cases, Many scholars, Monitoring programme, Move science, Natural ecosystems, Nitrogen oxides, Other hand, Oxford university press, Ozone layer, Pivotal role, Policy context, Policy process, Policy work, Political calculations, Political community, Political cooperation, Political interests, Political negotiations, Political order, Political parties, Polity press, Pollutant, Pollution, Power relations, Programme, Protocol, Rains model, Regime, Regime analysis, Regime analysts, Regime effectiveness, Regime formation, Regime theory, Same time, Shape regimes, Sheila jasanoff, Social conditions, Social order, Social project, Social scientists, Social studies, Soviet union, Sulphur dioxide, Sulphur emissions, Sundqvist, Support cooperation, Sustainable society, Transboundary, Transboundary fluxes, Uncritical view, Unece, Urban environment, Vandeveer, Wettestad, Widespread idea, World government, World order, World politics.
Abstract
The aim of this article is to analyse the role of science in environmental regimes. The focus is on through which conceptual lenses social scientists should judge the role of science in this area. In answering this question, the article takes as its point of departure the sociology of scientific knowledge (SSK). Three key findings of SSK are central to understanding the role of science in environmental regimes, namely that knowledge never moves freely, that the value of science is the result of negotiations and that science and policy are co-produced. The usefulness and explanatory power of this perspective is illustrated by a case study of one of the most science-based regimes that exist today, the Convention on Long-Range Transboundary Air Pollution (LRTAP). By way of conclusion, it is stated that science has no strength in itself but is given strength by different institutions and actors, and this has to be explained by social scientists.
Url:
DOI: 10.1177/1354066102008001003
Links toward previous steps (curation, corpus...)
- to stream Istex, to step Corpus: Pour aller vers cette notice dans l'étape Curation :000C73
Links to Exploration step
ISTEX:19FA2082F980786DF5384E969AB8FEC9920BDE6FLe document en format XML
<record><TEI wicri:istexFullTextTei="biblStruct"><teiHeader><fileDesc><titleStmt><title xml:lang="en">The Role of Science in Environmental Regimes: The Case of LRTAP</title>
<author><name sortKey="Lidskog, Rolf" sort="Lidskog, Rolf" uniqKey="Lidskog R" first="Rolf" last="Lidskog">Rolf Lidskog</name>
<affiliation wicri:level="1"><mods:affiliation>Göteborg University, Sweden</mods:affiliation>
<country xml:lang="fr">Suède</country>
<wicri:regionArea>Göteborg University</wicri:regionArea>
</affiliation>
<affiliation wicri:level="1"><mods:affiliation>Göteborg University, Sweden</mods:affiliation>
<country xml:lang="fr">Suède</country>
<wicri:regionArea>Göteborg University</wicri:regionArea>
</affiliation>
</author>
<author><name sortKey="Sundqvist, Goran" sort="Sundqvist, Goran" uniqKey="Sundqvist G" first="Göran" last="Sundqvist">Göran Sundqvist</name>
<affiliation wicri:level="1"><mods:affiliation>Göteborg University, Sweden</mods:affiliation>
<country xml:lang="fr">Suède</country>
<wicri:regionArea>Göteborg University</wicri:regionArea>
</affiliation>
<affiliation wicri:level="1"><mods:affiliation>Göteborg University, Sweden</mods:affiliation>
<country xml:lang="fr">Suède</country>
<wicri:regionArea>Göteborg University</wicri:regionArea>
</affiliation>
</author>
</titleStmt>
<publicationStmt><idno type="wicri:source">ISTEX</idno>
<idno type="RBID">ISTEX:19FA2082F980786DF5384E969AB8FEC9920BDE6F</idno>
<date when="2002" year="2002">2002</date>
<idno type="doi">10.1177/1354066102008001003</idno>
<idno type="url">https://api.istex.fr/document/19FA2082F980786DF5384E969AB8FEC9920BDE6F/fulltext/pdf</idno>
<idno type="wicri:Area/Istex/Corpus">000C73</idno>
<idno type="wicri:explorRef" wicri:stream="Istex" wicri:step="Corpus" wicri:corpus="ISTEX">000C73</idno>
<idno type="wicri:Area/Istex/Curation">000C73</idno>
</publicationStmt>
<sourceDesc><biblStruct><analytic><title level="a" type="main" xml:lang="en">The Role of Science in Environmental Regimes: The Case of LRTAP</title>
<author><name sortKey="Lidskog, Rolf" sort="Lidskog, Rolf" uniqKey="Lidskog R" first="Rolf" last="Lidskog">Rolf Lidskog</name>
<affiliation wicri:level="1"><mods:affiliation>Göteborg University, Sweden</mods:affiliation>
<country xml:lang="fr">Suède</country>
<wicri:regionArea>Göteborg University</wicri:regionArea>
</affiliation>
<affiliation wicri:level="1"><mods:affiliation>Göteborg University, Sweden</mods:affiliation>
<country xml:lang="fr">Suède</country>
<wicri:regionArea>Göteborg University</wicri:regionArea>
</affiliation>
</author>
<author><name sortKey="Sundqvist, Goran" sort="Sundqvist, Goran" uniqKey="Sundqvist G" first="Göran" last="Sundqvist">Göran Sundqvist</name>
<affiliation wicri:level="1"><mods:affiliation>Göteborg University, Sweden</mods:affiliation>
<country xml:lang="fr">Suède</country>
<wicri:regionArea>Göteborg University</wicri:regionArea>
</affiliation>
<affiliation wicri:level="1"><mods:affiliation>Göteborg University, Sweden</mods:affiliation>
<country xml:lang="fr">Suède</country>
<wicri:regionArea>Göteborg University</wicri:regionArea>
</affiliation>
</author>
</analytic>
<monogr></monogr>
<series><title level="j">European journal of international relations</title>
<idno type="ISSN">1354-0661</idno>
<idno type="eISSN">1460-3713</idno>
<imprint><publisher>Sage Publications</publisher>
<pubPlace>London</pubPlace>
<date type="published" when="2002-03">2002-03</date>
<biblScope unit="volume">8</biblScope>
<biblScope unit="issue">1</biblScope>
<biblScope unit="page" from="77">77</biblScope>
<biblScope unit="page" to="101">101</biblScope>
</imprint>
<idno type="ISSN">1354-0661</idno>
</series>
</biblStruct>
</sourceDesc>
<seriesStmt><idno type="ISSN">1354-0661</idno>
</seriesStmt>
</fileDesc>
<profileDesc><textClass><keywords scheme="KwdEn" xml:lang="en"><term>Acid rain</term>
<term>Airborne pollutants</term>
<term>Behavioral mechanisms</term>
<term>Boundary object</term>
<term>Boundary objects</term>
<term>Boundary work</term>
<term>Cambridge university press</term>
<term>Case study</term>
<term>Causal connections</term>
<term>Chicago press</term>
<term>Climate change</term>
<term>Conceptual lenses</term>
<term>Consensual</term>
<term>Consensual knowledge</term>
<term>Convergent state policies</term>
<term>Cornell university press</term>
<term>Cosmopolitan democracy</term>
<term>Critical loads</term>
<term>Critical loads approach</term>
<term>Critical loads concept</term>
<term>Deeper understanding</term>
<term>Different institutions</term>
<term>Discursive democracy</term>
<term>Effective regimes</term>
<term>Emep</term>
<term>Emep programme</term>
<term>Enrp discussion paper kennedy school</term>
<term>Environmental</term>
<term>Environmental governance</term>
<term>Environmental issues</term>
<term>Environmental policy</term>
<term>Environmental problems</term>
<term>Environmental protection</term>
<term>Environmental regimes</term>
<term>Epistemic</term>
<term>Epistemic communities</term>
<term>Epistemic community</term>
<term>Epistemic community approach</term>
<term>Epistemic community model</term>
<term>European journal</term>
<term>Explanatory power</term>
<term>Factual evidence</term>
<term>Global</term>
<term>Global economy</term>
<term>Good example</term>
<term>Governance</term>
<term>Grant college</term>
<term>Haas</term>
<term>Harvard university</term>
<term>Harvard university press</term>
<term>Human environment</term>
<term>Human health</term>
<term>Important factor</term>
<term>Important role</term>
<term>Institutional approach</term>
<term>Institutional model</term>
<term>Institutionalism</term>
<term>Institutionalists</term>
<term>International cooperation</term>
<term>International governance</term>
<term>International organization haas</term>
<term>International policy coordination</term>
<term>International regimes</term>
<term>International relations</term>
<term>Jasanoff</term>
<term>Latour</term>
<term>Lidskog</term>
<term>Lidskog sundqvist</term>
<term>Lrtap</term>
<term>Lrtap convention</term>
<term>Lrtap regime</term>
<term>Many cases</term>
<term>Many scholars</term>
<term>Monitoring programme</term>
<term>Move science</term>
<term>Natural ecosystems</term>
<term>Nitrogen oxides</term>
<term>Other hand</term>
<term>Oxford university press</term>
<term>Ozone layer</term>
<term>Pivotal role</term>
<term>Policy context</term>
<term>Policy process</term>
<term>Policy work</term>
<term>Political calculations</term>
<term>Political community</term>
<term>Political cooperation</term>
<term>Political interests</term>
<term>Political negotiations</term>
<term>Political order</term>
<term>Political parties</term>
<term>Polity press</term>
<term>Pollutant</term>
<term>Pollution</term>
<term>Power relations</term>
<term>Programme</term>
<term>Protocol</term>
<term>Rains model</term>
<term>Regime</term>
<term>Regime analysis</term>
<term>Regime analysts</term>
<term>Regime effectiveness</term>
<term>Regime formation</term>
<term>Regime theory</term>
<term>Same time</term>
<term>Shape regimes</term>
<term>Sheila jasanoff</term>
<term>Social conditions</term>
<term>Social order</term>
<term>Social project</term>
<term>Social scientists</term>
<term>Social studies</term>
<term>Soviet union</term>
<term>Sulphur dioxide</term>
<term>Sulphur emissions</term>
<term>Sundqvist</term>
<term>Support cooperation</term>
<term>Sustainable society</term>
<term>Transboundary</term>
<term>Transboundary fluxes</term>
<term>Uncritical view</term>
<term>Unece</term>
<term>Urban environment</term>
<term>Vandeveer</term>
<term>Wettestad</term>
<term>Widespread idea</term>
<term>World government</term>
<term>World order</term>
<term>World politics</term>
</keywords>
<keywords scheme="Teeft" xml:lang="en"><term>Acid rain</term>
<term>Airborne pollutants</term>
<term>Behavioral mechanisms</term>
<term>Boundary object</term>
<term>Boundary objects</term>
<term>Boundary work</term>
<term>Cambridge university press</term>
<term>Case study</term>
<term>Causal connections</term>
<term>Chicago press</term>
<term>Climate change</term>
<term>Conceptual lenses</term>
<term>Consensual</term>
<term>Consensual knowledge</term>
<term>Convergent state policies</term>
<term>Cornell university press</term>
<term>Cosmopolitan democracy</term>
<term>Critical loads</term>
<term>Critical loads approach</term>
<term>Critical loads concept</term>
<term>Deeper understanding</term>
<term>Different institutions</term>
<term>Discursive democracy</term>
<term>Effective regimes</term>
<term>Emep</term>
<term>Emep programme</term>
<term>Enrp discussion paper kennedy school</term>
<term>Environmental</term>
<term>Environmental governance</term>
<term>Environmental issues</term>
<term>Environmental policy</term>
<term>Environmental problems</term>
<term>Environmental protection</term>
<term>Environmental regimes</term>
<term>Epistemic</term>
<term>Epistemic communities</term>
<term>Epistemic community</term>
<term>Epistemic community approach</term>
<term>Epistemic community model</term>
<term>European journal</term>
<term>Explanatory power</term>
<term>Factual evidence</term>
<term>Global</term>
<term>Global economy</term>
<term>Good example</term>
<term>Governance</term>
<term>Grant college</term>
<term>Haas</term>
<term>Harvard university</term>
<term>Harvard university press</term>
<term>Human environment</term>
<term>Human health</term>
<term>Important factor</term>
<term>Important role</term>
<term>Institutional approach</term>
<term>Institutional model</term>
<term>Institutionalism</term>
<term>Institutionalists</term>
<term>International cooperation</term>
<term>International governance</term>
<term>International organization haas</term>
<term>International policy coordination</term>
<term>International regimes</term>
<term>International relations</term>
<term>Jasanoff</term>
<term>Latour</term>
<term>Lidskog</term>
<term>Lidskog sundqvist</term>
<term>Lrtap</term>
<term>Lrtap convention</term>
<term>Lrtap regime</term>
<term>Many cases</term>
<term>Many scholars</term>
<term>Monitoring programme</term>
<term>Move science</term>
<term>Natural ecosystems</term>
<term>Nitrogen oxides</term>
<term>Other hand</term>
<term>Oxford university press</term>
<term>Ozone layer</term>
<term>Pivotal role</term>
<term>Policy context</term>
<term>Policy process</term>
<term>Policy work</term>
<term>Political calculations</term>
<term>Political community</term>
<term>Political cooperation</term>
<term>Political interests</term>
<term>Political negotiations</term>
<term>Political order</term>
<term>Political parties</term>
<term>Polity press</term>
<term>Pollutant</term>
<term>Pollution</term>
<term>Power relations</term>
<term>Programme</term>
<term>Protocol</term>
<term>Rains model</term>
<term>Regime</term>
<term>Regime analysis</term>
<term>Regime analysts</term>
<term>Regime effectiveness</term>
<term>Regime formation</term>
<term>Regime theory</term>
<term>Same time</term>
<term>Shape regimes</term>
<term>Sheila jasanoff</term>
<term>Social conditions</term>
<term>Social order</term>
<term>Social project</term>
<term>Social scientists</term>
<term>Social studies</term>
<term>Soviet union</term>
<term>Sulphur dioxide</term>
<term>Sulphur emissions</term>
<term>Sundqvist</term>
<term>Support cooperation</term>
<term>Sustainable society</term>
<term>Transboundary</term>
<term>Transboundary fluxes</term>
<term>Uncritical view</term>
<term>Unece</term>
<term>Urban environment</term>
<term>Vandeveer</term>
<term>Wettestad</term>
<term>Widespread idea</term>
<term>World government</term>
<term>World order</term>
<term>World politics</term>
</keywords>
<keywords scheme="Wicri" type="topic" xml:lang="fr"><term>Pluie acide</term>
<term>étude de cas</term>
<term>Changement climatique</term>
<term>Politique de l'environnement</term>
<term>Protection de l'environnement</term>
<term>Gouvernance</term>
<term>Coopération internationale</term>
<term>Relation internationale</term>
<term>Coopération politique</term>
<term>Partis politiques</term>
<term>Polluant</term>
<term>Pollution</term>
<term>Protocole</term>
</keywords>
</textClass>
<langUsage><language ident="en">en</language>
</langUsage>
</profileDesc>
</teiHeader>
<front><div type="abstract" xml:lang="en">The aim of this article is to analyse the role of science in environmental regimes. The focus is on through which conceptual lenses social scientists should judge the role of science in this area. In answering this question, the article takes as its point of departure the sociology of scientific knowledge (SSK). Three key findings of SSK are central to understanding the role of science in environmental regimes, namely that knowledge never moves freely, that the value of science is the result of negotiations and that science and policy are co-produced. The usefulness and explanatory power of this perspective is illustrated by a case study of one of the most science-based regimes that exist today, the Convention on Long-Range Transboundary Air Pollution (LRTAP). By way of conclusion, it is stated that science has no strength in itself but is given strength by different institutions and actors, and this has to be explained by social scientists.</div>
</front>
</TEI>
</record>
Pour manipuler ce document sous Unix (Dilib)
EXPLOR_STEP=$WICRI_ROOT/Wicri/Santé/explor/EdenteV2/Data/Istex/Curation
HfdSelect -h $EXPLOR_STEP/biblio.hfd -nk 000C73 | SxmlIndent | more
Ou
HfdSelect -h $EXPLOR_AREA/Data/Istex/Curation/biblio.hfd -nk 000C73 | SxmlIndent | more
Pour mettre un lien sur cette page dans le réseau Wicri
{{Explor lien |wiki= Wicri/Santé |area= EdenteV2 |flux= Istex |étape= Curation |type= RBID |clé= ISTEX:19FA2082F980786DF5384E969AB8FEC9920BDE6F |texte= The Role of Science in Environmental Regimes: The Case of LRTAP }}
This area was generated with Dilib version V0.6.32. |