Successful outcome of splinted implants supporting a ‘planned’ maxillary overdenture: a retrospective evaluation and comparison with fixed full dental prostheses
Identifieur interne : 007D25 ( Istex/Corpus ); précédent : 007D24; suivant : 007D26Successful outcome of splinted implants supporting a ‘planned’ maxillary overdenture: a retrospective evaluation and comparison with fixed full dental prostheses
Auteurs : A. Sanna ; P. Nuytens ; I. Naert ; M. QuirynenSource :
- Clinical Oral Implants Research [ 0905-7161 ] ; 2009-04.
English descriptors
- KwdEn :
- Abutment, Abutment connection, Annual bone loss, Bergendal engquist, Bone level, Bone loss, Branemark implants, Catholic university leuven, Clin, Control group, Cumulative survival rate, Dental prostheses, Dental research, Dentistry, Denture, Edentulous, Engquist, Feine, Frequency distribution, General satisfaction, Heydecke, Impl, Implant, Implants research, International journal, Jemt, John wiley sons, Journal compilation, Last visit, Leuven, Loading time, Mandibular, Maxilla, Maxillary, Maxillary implants, Maxillary overdenture, Maxillary overdentures, Maxillofacial, Naert, Nobel biocare, Oral impl, Oral maxillofacial implants, Osseointegrated implants, Overdenture, Overdenture maxilla, Overdentures, Prosthesis, Prosthetic, Prosthetic dentistry, Quirynen, Removable, Removable overdentures, Retrospective, Retrospective evaluation, Retrospective study, Sanna, Site level, Splinted, Splinted implants, Steenberghe, Subgroup.
- Teeft :
- Abutment, Abutment connection, Annual bone loss, Bergendal engquist, Bone level, Bone loss, Branemark implants, Catholic university leuven, Clin, Control group, Cumulative survival rate, Dental prostheses, Dental research, Dentistry, Denture, Edentulous, Engquist, Feine, Frequency distribution, General satisfaction, Heydecke, Impl, Implant, Implants research, International journal, Jemt, John wiley sons, Journal compilation, Last visit, Leuven, Loading time, Mandibular, Maxilla, Maxillary, Maxillary implants, Maxillary overdenture, Maxillary overdentures, Maxillofacial, Naert, Nobel biocare, Oral impl, Oral maxillofacial implants, Osseointegrated implants, Overdenture, Overdenture maxilla, Overdentures, Prosthesis, Prosthetic, Prosthetic dentistry, Quirynen, Removable, Removable overdentures, Retrospective, Retrospective evaluation, Retrospective study, Sanna, Site level, Splinted, Splinted implants, Steenberghe, Subgroup.
Abstract
Objective: Whereas an overdenture concept is generally accepted for the mandible, the outcome of this therapy for the maxilla remains less documented. This retrospective analysis evaluated the peri‐implant parameters of implants supporting a ‘planned’ overdenture in the maxilla, and compared these data with those of an age‐matched control group, with a fixed full dental prosthesis.
Url:
DOI: 10.1111/j.1600-0501.2008.01664.x
Links to Exploration step
ISTEX:FD13B9FB7C3F64D5450288B6C019FA2A0AB58B3ALe document en format XML
<record><TEI wicri:istexFullTextTei="biblStruct"><teiHeader><fileDesc><titleStmt><title xml:lang="en">Successful outcome of splinted implants supporting a ‘planned’ maxillary overdenture: a retrospective evaluation and comparison with fixed full dental prostheses</title><author><name sortKey="Sanna, A" sort="Sanna, A" uniqKey="Sanna A" first="A." last="Sanna">A. Sanna</name><affiliation><mods:affiliation>Department of Periodontology, Catholic University Leuven, Leuven, Belgium</mods:affiliation></affiliation></author><author><name sortKey="Nuytens, P" sort="Nuytens, P" uniqKey="Nuytens P" first="P." last="Nuytens">P. Nuytens</name><affiliation><mods:affiliation>Department of Prosthetic Dentistry, Catholic University Leuven, Leuven, Belgium</mods:affiliation></affiliation></author><author><name sortKey="Naert, I" sort="Naert, I" uniqKey="Naert I" first="I." last="Naert">I. Naert</name><affiliation><mods:affiliation>Department of Prosthetic Dentistry, Catholic University Leuven, Leuven, Belgium</mods:affiliation></affiliation></author><author><name sortKey="Quirynen, M" sort="Quirynen, M" uniqKey="Quirynen M" first="M." last="Quirynen">M. Quirynen</name><affiliation><mods:affiliation>Department of Periodontology, Catholic University Leuven, Leuven, Belgium</mods:affiliation></affiliation></author></titleStmt><publicationStmt><idno type="wicri:source">ISTEX</idno><idno type="RBID">ISTEX:FD13B9FB7C3F64D5450288B6C019FA2A0AB58B3A</idno><date when="2009" year="2009">2009</date><idno type="doi">10.1111/j.1600-0501.2008.01664.x</idno><idno type="url">https://api.istex.fr/document/FD13B9FB7C3F64D5450288B6C019FA2A0AB58B3A/fulltext/pdf</idno><idno type="wicri:Area/Istex/Corpus">007D25</idno><idno type="wicri:explorRef" wicri:stream="Istex" wicri:step="Corpus" wicri:corpus="ISTEX">007D25</idno></publicationStmt><sourceDesc><biblStruct><analytic><title level="a" type="main">Successful outcome of splinted implants supporting a ‘planned’ maxillary overdenture: a retrospective evaluation and comparison with fixed full dental prostheses</title><author><name sortKey="Sanna, A" sort="Sanna, A" uniqKey="Sanna A" first="A." last="Sanna">A. Sanna</name><affiliation><mods:affiliation>Department of Periodontology, Catholic University Leuven, Leuven, Belgium</mods:affiliation></affiliation></author><author><name sortKey="Nuytens, P" sort="Nuytens, P" uniqKey="Nuytens P" first="P." last="Nuytens">P. Nuytens</name><affiliation><mods:affiliation>Department of Prosthetic Dentistry, Catholic University Leuven, Leuven, Belgium</mods:affiliation></affiliation></author><author><name sortKey="Naert, I" sort="Naert, I" uniqKey="Naert I" first="I." last="Naert">I. Naert</name><affiliation><mods:affiliation>Department of Prosthetic Dentistry, Catholic University Leuven, Leuven, Belgium</mods:affiliation></affiliation></author><author><name sortKey="Quirynen, M" sort="Quirynen, M" uniqKey="Quirynen M" first="M." last="Quirynen">M. Quirynen</name><affiliation><mods:affiliation>Department of Periodontology, Catholic University Leuven, Leuven, Belgium</mods:affiliation></affiliation></author></analytic><monogr></monogr><series><title level="j" type="main">Clinical Oral Implants Research</title><title level="j" type="alt">CLINICAL ORAL IMPLANTS RESEARCH</title><idno type="ISSN">0905-7161</idno><idno type="eISSN">1600-0501</idno><imprint><biblScope unit="vol">20</biblScope><biblScope unit="issue">4</biblScope><biblScope unit="page" from="406">406</biblScope><biblScope unit="page" to="413">413</biblScope><biblScope unit="page-count">8</biblScope><publisher>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</publisher><pubPlace>Oxford, UK</pubPlace><date type="published" when="2009-04">2009-04</date></imprint><idno type="ISSN">0905-7161</idno></series></biblStruct></sourceDesc><seriesStmt><idno type="ISSN">0905-7161</idno></seriesStmt></fileDesc><profileDesc><textClass><keywords scheme="KwdEn" xml:lang="en"><term>Abutment</term><term>Abutment connection</term><term>Annual bone loss</term><term>Bergendal engquist</term><term>Bone level</term><term>Bone loss</term><term>Branemark implants</term><term>Catholic university leuven</term><term>Clin</term><term>Control group</term><term>Cumulative survival rate</term><term>Dental prostheses</term><term>Dental research</term><term>Dentistry</term><term>Denture</term><term>Edentulous</term><term>Engquist</term><term>Feine</term><term>Frequency distribution</term><term>General satisfaction</term><term>Heydecke</term><term>Impl</term><term>Implant</term><term>Implants research</term><term>International journal</term><term>Jemt</term><term>John wiley sons</term><term>Journal compilation</term><term>Last visit</term><term>Leuven</term><term>Loading time</term><term>Mandibular</term><term>Maxilla</term><term>Maxillary</term><term>Maxillary implants</term><term>Maxillary overdenture</term><term>Maxillary overdentures</term><term>Maxillofacial</term><term>Naert</term><term>Nobel biocare</term><term>Oral impl</term><term>Oral maxillofacial implants</term><term>Osseointegrated implants</term><term>Overdenture</term><term>Overdenture maxilla</term><term>Overdentures</term><term>Prosthesis</term><term>Prosthetic</term><term>Prosthetic dentistry</term><term>Quirynen</term><term>Removable</term><term>Removable overdentures</term><term>Retrospective</term><term>Retrospective evaluation</term><term>Retrospective study</term><term>Sanna</term><term>Site level</term><term>Splinted</term><term>Splinted implants</term><term>Steenberghe</term><term>Subgroup</term></keywords><keywords scheme="Teeft" xml:lang="en"><term>Abutment</term><term>Abutment connection</term><term>Annual bone loss</term><term>Bergendal engquist</term><term>Bone level</term><term>Bone loss</term><term>Branemark implants</term><term>Catholic university leuven</term><term>Clin</term><term>Control group</term><term>Cumulative survival rate</term><term>Dental prostheses</term><term>Dental research</term><term>Dentistry</term><term>Denture</term><term>Edentulous</term><term>Engquist</term><term>Feine</term><term>Frequency distribution</term><term>General satisfaction</term><term>Heydecke</term><term>Impl</term><term>Implant</term><term>Implants research</term><term>International journal</term><term>Jemt</term><term>John wiley sons</term><term>Journal compilation</term><term>Last visit</term><term>Leuven</term><term>Loading time</term><term>Mandibular</term><term>Maxilla</term><term>Maxillary</term><term>Maxillary implants</term><term>Maxillary overdenture</term><term>Maxillary overdentures</term><term>Maxillofacial</term><term>Naert</term><term>Nobel biocare</term><term>Oral impl</term><term>Oral maxillofacial implants</term><term>Osseointegrated implants</term><term>Overdenture</term><term>Overdenture maxilla</term><term>Overdentures</term><term>Prosthesis</term><term>Prosthetic</term><term>Prosthetic dentistry</term><term>Quirynen</term><term>Removable</term><term>Removable overdentures</term><term>Retrospective</term><term>Retrospective evaluation</term><term>Retrospective study</term><term>Sanna</term><term>Site level</term><term>Splinted</term><term>Splinted implants</term><term>Steenberghe</term><term>Subgroup</term></keywords></textClass></profileDesc></teiHeader><front><div type="abstract">Objective: Whereas an overdenture concept is generally accepted for the mandible, the outcome of this therapy for the maxilla remains less documented. This retrospective analysis evaluated the peri‐implant parameters of implants supporting a ‘planned’ overdenture in the maxilla, and compared these data with those of an age‐matched control group, with a fixed full dental prosthesis.</div></front></TEI><istex><corpusName>wiley</corpusName><keywords><teeft><json:string>implant</json:string><json:string>prosthesis</json:string><json:string>overdenture</json:string><json:string>overdentures</json:string><json:string>maxilla</json:string><json:string>abutment</json:string><json:string>maxillary</json:string><json:string>international journal</json:string><json:string>naert</json:string><json:string>oral maxillofacial implants</json:string><json:string>denture</json:string><json:string>maxillofacial</json:string><json:string>jemt</json:string><json:string>leuven</json:string><json:string>sanna</json:string><json:string>feine</json:string><json:string>mandibular</json:string><json:string>maxillary overdentures</json:string><json:string>engquist</json:string><json:string>bone loss</json:string><json:string>subgroup</json:string><json:string>prosthetic</json:string><json:string>clin</json:string><json:string>impl</json:string><json:string>oral impl</json:string><json:string>john wiley sons</json:string><json:string>journal compilation</json:string><json:string>quirynen</json:string><json:string>splinted</json:string><json:string>heydecke</json:string><json:string>steenberghe</json:string><json:string>abutment connection</json:string><json:string>general satisfaction</json:string><json:string>retrospective study</json:string><json:string>dentistry</json:string><json:string>retrospective</json:string><json:string>dental research</json:string><json:string>control group</json:string><json:string>annual bone loss</json:string><json:string>osseointegrated implants</json:string><json:string>removable</json:string><json:string>removable overdentures</json:string><json:string>frequency distribution</json:string><json:string>overdenture maxilla</json:string><json:string>cumulative survival rate</json:string><json:string>site level</json:string><json:string>splinted implants</json:string><json:string>last visit</json:string><json:string>edentulous</json:string><json:string>prosthetic dentistry</json:string><json:string>nobel biocare</json:string><json:string>maxillary overdenture</json:string><json:string>maxillary implants</json:string><json:string>bergendal engquist</json:string><json:string>retrospective evaluation</json:string><json:string>bone level</json:string><json:string>loading time</json:string><json:string>catholic university leuven</json:string><json:string>dental prostheses</json:string><json:string>implants research</json:string><json:string>branemark implants</json:string></teeft></keywords><author><json:item><name>A. Sanna</name><affiliations><json:string>Department of Periodontology, Catholic University Leuven, Leuven, Belgium</json:string></affiliations></json:item><json:item><name>P. Nuytens</name><affiliations><json:string>Department of Prosthetic Dentistry, Catholic University Leuven, Leuven, Belgium</json:string></affiliations></json:item><json:item><name>I. Naert</name><affiliations><json:string>Department of Prosthetic Dentistry, Catholic University Leuven, Leuven, Belgium</json:string></affiliations></json:item><json:item><name>M. Quirynen</name><affiliations><json:string>Department of Periodontology, Catholic University Leuven, Leuven, Belgium</json:string></affiliations></json:item></author><subject><json:item><lang><json:string>eng</json:string></lang><value>attachment loss</value></json:item><json:item><lang><json:string>eng</json:string></lang><value>bone loss</value></json:item><json:item><lang><json:string>eng</json:string></lang><value>implants</value></json:item><json:item><lang><json:string>eng</json:string></lang><value>implant success</value></json:item><json:item><lang><json:string>eng</json:string></lang><value>maxilla</value></json:item><json:item><lang><json:string>eng</json:string></lang><value>overdenture</value></json:item><json:item><lang><json:string>eng</json:string></lang><value>peri‐implantitis</value></json:item><json:item><lang><json:string>eng</json:string></lang><value>survival</value></json:item><json:item><lang><json:string>eng</json:string></lang><value>susceptibility</value></json:item></subject><articleId><json:string>CLR1664</json:string></articleId><arkIstex>ark:/67375/WNG-TLPPQ411-K</arkIstex><language><json:string>eng</json:string></language><originalGenre><json:string>article</json:string></originalGenre><abstract>Objective: Whereas an overdenture concept is generally accepted for the mandible, the outcome of this therapy for the maxilla remains less documented. This retrospective analysis evaluated the peri‐implant parameters of implants supporting a ‘planned’ overdenture in the maxilla, and compared these data with those of an age‐matched control group, with a fixed full dental prosthesis.</abstract><qualityIndicators><score>7.66</score><pdfWordCount>5888</pdfWordCount><pdfCharCount>37241</pdfCharCount><pdfVersion>1.3</pdfVersion><pdfPageCount>8</pdfPageCount><pdfPageSize>595.276 x 782.362 pts</pdfPageSize><refBibsNative>true</refBibsNative><abstractWordCount>55</abstractWordCount><abstractCharCount>384</abstractCharCount><keywordCount>9</keywordCount></qualityIndicators><title>Successful outcome of splinted implants supporting a ‘planned’ maxillary overdenture: a retrospective evaluation and comparison with fixed full dental prostheses</title><pmid><json:string>19298295</json:string></pmid><genre><json:string>article</json:string></genre><host><title>Clinical Oral Implants Research</title><language><json:string>unknown</json:string></language><doi><json:string>10.1111/(ISSN)1600-0501</json:string></doi><issn><json:string>0905-7161</json:string></issn><eissn><json:string>1600-0501</json:string></eissn><publisherId><json:string>CLR</json:string></publisherId><volume>20</volume><issue>4</issue><pages><first>406</first><last>413</last><total>8</total></pages><genre><json:string>journal</json:string></genre></host><namedEntities><unitex><date><json:string>2009</json:string><json:string>5</json:string><json:string>3</json:string></date><geogName><json:string>Sanna</json:string></geogName><orgName><json:string>Department of Prosthetic Dentistry, Catholic University Leuven, Leuven, Belgium Successful</json:string><json:string>Ethical Committee of the University Hospital Leuven</json:string><json:string>Quirynen Department of Periodontology Catholic University Leuven Kapucijnenvoer</json:string><json:string>Hospital of the Catholic University Leuven</json:string><json:string>Leuven University</json:string><json:string>University Hospital Leuven</json:string><json:string>Leuven Belgium Tel</json:string></orgName><orgName_funder></orgName_funder><orgName_provider></orgName_provider><persName><json:string>John Wiley</json:string><json:string>Dentistry</json:string><json:string>G.T. Jr</json:string><json:string>I. Naert</json:string></persName><placeName><json:string>Lund</json:string><json:string>Germany</json:string><json:string>Antwerp</json:string><json:string>Heidelberg</json:string><json:string>Montreal</json:string><json:string>Canada</json:string><json:string>Albuquerque</json:string><json:string>Leuven</json:string><json:string>Quebec</json:string><json:string>Belgium</json:string></placeName><ref_url></ref_url><ref_bibl><json:string>Heydecke et al. 2003</json:string><json:string>Schwartz-Arad et al. 2005</json:string><json:string>Awad et al. 2000</json:string><json:string>Kramer et al. 1992</json:string><json:string>Zitzmann & Marinello 2000</json:string><json:string>Awad et al. (2000)</json:string><json:string>Palmqvist et al. (1994)</json:string><json:string>MericskeStern et al. 2002</json:string><json:string>Quirynen et al. 1992</json:string><json:string>de Grandmont et al. 1994</json:string><json:string>Jemt et al. 1992, 1996</json:string><json:string>Lekholm and Zarb (1985)</json:string><json:string>Hooghe & Naert 1997</json:string><json:string>Naert et al. 2004</json:string><json:string>Feine et al. 2002</json:string><json:string>Johns et al. 1992</json:string><json:string>Jemt et al. 1992</json:string><json:string>Smedberg et al. 1999</json:string><json:string>Morais et al. 2003</json:string><json:string>Berglundh et al. 2002</json:string><json:string>Engquist et al. 1988</json:string><json:string>Widbom et al. 2005</json:string><json:string>Feine et al. 1994a</json:string><json:string>SchwartzArad et al. 2005</json:string><json:string>Bergendal & Engquist 1998</json:string><json:string>Smedberg et al. 1993</json:string><json:string>Kronstrom et al. 2006</json:string><json:string>Feine et al. 1994a, 1994b</json:string><json:string>Hutton et al. 1995</json:string><json:string>Lothigius et al. (1991)</json:string><json:string>Hutton et al. (1995)</json:string><json:string>Sanna et al</json:string><json:string>Heydecke et al. 2004</json:string><json:string>Lothigius et al. 1991</json:string><json:string>Mericske-Stern et al. 2002</json:string><json:string>Heydecke et al. (2003)</json:string><json:string>Eckert & Carr 2004</json:string><json:string>van Steenberghe et al. 2001</json:string><json:string>Naert et al. 1998</json:string><json:string>Narhi et al. 2001</json:string><json:string>Jemt & Book 1996</json:string><json:string>Kiener et al. 2001</json:string></ref_bibl><bibl></bibl></unitex></namedEntities><ark><json:string>ark:/67375/WNG-TLPPQ411-K</json:string></ark><categories><wos><json:string>1 - science</json:string><json:string>2 - engineering, biomedical</json:string><json:string>2 - dentistry, oral surgery & medicine</json:string></wos><scienceMetrix><json:string>1 - health sciences</json:string><json:string>2 - clinical medicine</json:string><json:string>3 - dentistry</json:string></scienceMetrix><scopus><json:string>1 - Health Sciences</json:string><json:string>2 - Dentistry</json:string><json:string>3 - Oral Surgery</json:string></scopus></categories><publicationDate>2009</publicationDate><copyrightDate>2009</copyrightDate><doi><json:string>10.1111/j.1600-0501.2008.01664.x</json:string></doi><id>FD13B9FB7C3F64D5450288B6C019FA2A0AB58B3A</id><score>1</score><fulltext><json:item><extension>pdf</extension><original>true</original><mimetype>application/pdf</mimetype><uri>https://api.istex.fr/document/FD13B9FB7C3F64D5450288B6C019FA2A0AB58B3A/fulltext/pdf</uri></json:item><json:item><extension>zip</extension><original>false</original><mimetype>application/zip</mimetype><uri>https://api.istex.fr/document/FD13B9FB7C3F64D5450288B6C019FA2A0AB58B3A/fulltext/zip</uri></json:item><istex:fulltextTEI uri="https://api.istex.fr/document/FD13B9FB7C3F64D5450288B6C019FA2A0AB58B3A/fulltext/tei"><teiHeader><fileDesc><titleStmt><title level="a" type="main">Successful outcome of splinted implants supporting a ‘planned’ maxillary overdenture: a retrospective evaluation and comparison with fixed full dental prostheses</title></titleStmt><publicationStmt><authority>ISTEX</authority><publisher>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</publisher><pubPlace>Oxford, UK</pubPlace><availability><licence>© 2009 The Authors. Journal compilation © 2009 John Wiley & Sons A/S</licence></availability><date type="published" when="2009-04"></date></publicationStmt><notesStmt><note type="content-type" subtype="article" source="article" scheme="https://content-type.data.istex.fr/ark:/67375/XTP-6N5SZHKN-D">article</note><note type="publication-type" subtype="journal" scheme="https://publication-type.data.istex.fr/ark:/67375/JMC-0GLKJH51-B">journal</note></notesStmt><sourceDesc><biblStruct type="article"><analytic><title level="a" type="main">Successful outcome of splinted implants supporting a ‘planned’ maxillary overdenture: a retrospective evaluation and comparison with fixed full dental prostheses</title><title level="a" type="short">Implants supporting overdenture maxilla</title><author xml:id="author-0000"><persName><forename type="first">A.</forename><surname>Sanna</surname></persName><affiliation>Department of Periodontology, Catholic University Leuven, Leuven, Belgium<address><country key="BE"></country></address></affiliation></author><author xml:id="author-0001"><persName><forename type="first">P.</forename><surname>Nuytens</surname></persName><affiliation>Department of Prosthetic Dentistry, Catholic University Leuven, Leuven, Belgium<address><country key="BE"></country></address></affiliation></author><author xml:id="author-0002"><persName><forename type="first">I.</forename><surname>Naert</surname></persName><affiliation>Department of Prosthetic Dentistry, Catholic University Leuven, Leuven, Belgium<address><country key="BE"></country></address></affiliation></author><author xml:id="author-0003"><persName><forename type="first">M.</forename><surname>Quirynen</surname></persName><affiliation>Department of Periodontology, Catholic University Leuven, Leuven, Belgium<address><country key="BE"></country></address></affiliation></author><idno type="istex">FD13B9FB7C3F64D5450288B6C019FA2A0AB58B3A</idno><idno type="ark">ark:/67375/WNG-TLPPQ411-K</idno><idno type="DOI">10.1111/j.1600-0501.2008.01664.x</idno><idno type="unit">CLR1664</idno><idno type="supplier">1664</idno><idno type="toTypesetVersion">file:CLR.CLR1664.pdf</idno></analytic><monogr><title level="j" type="main">Clinical Oral Implants Research</title><title level="j" type="alt">CLINICAL ORAL IMPLANTS RESEARCH</title><idno type="pISSN">0905-7161</idno><idno type="eISSN">1600-0501</idno><idno type="book-DOI">10.1111/(ISSN)1600-0501</idno><idno type="book-part-DOI">10.1111/clr.2009.20.issue-4</idno><idno type="product">CLR</idno><idno type="publisherDivision">ST</idno><imprint><biblScope unit="vol">20</biblScope><biblScope unit="issue">4</biblScope><biblScope unit="page" from="406">406</biblScope><biblScope unit="page" to="413">413</biblScope><biblScope unit="page-count">8</biblScope><publisher>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</publisher><pubPlace>Oxford, UK</pubPlace><date type="published" when="2009-04"></date></imprint></monogr></biblStruct></sourceDesc></fileDesc><profileDesc><abstract xml:lang="en" style="main"><head>Abstract</head><p><hi rend="bold">Objective: </hi> Whereas an overdenture concept is generally accepted for the mandible, the outcome of this therapy for the maxilla remains less documented. This retrospective analysis evaluated the peri‐implant parameters of implants supporting a ‘planned’ overdenture in the maxilla, and compared these data with those of an age‐matched control group, with a fixed full dental prosthesis.</p><p><hi rend="bold">Material and methods: </hi> All patients with an implant‐supported overdenture in the maxilla from the Leuven University Hospital (at least 12 months in function) were recalled for a thorough examination. Forty‐four patients (162 implants, Brånemark type) could be enrolled.</p><p><hi rend="bold">Results: </hi> The mean loading time was 9 years (range: >1 to >20 years). The cumulative survival rate after 10 years of function was 99.3% if four to six interconnected implants supported the overdenture, but only 85.7% in case two non‐connected implants were used as support. The marginal bone level in the former group remained stable, with changes comparable with those observed for implants supporting fixed full dental prostheses.</p><p><hi rend="bold">Conclusions: </hi> These results fully support the overdenture treatment concept for the maxilla, at least when ≥4 splinted implants are used.</p></abstract><textClass><keywords xml:lang="en"><term xml:id="k1">attachment loss</term><term xml:id="k2">bone loss</term><term xml:id="k3">implants</term><term xml:id="k4">implant success</term><term xml:id="k5">maxilla</term><term xml:id="k6">overdenture</term><term xml:id="k7">peri‐implantitis</term><term xml:id="k8">survival</term><term xml:id="k9">susceptibility</term></keywords><keywords rend="tocHeading1"><term>Original Articles</term></keywords></textClass><langUsage><language ident="en"></language></langUsage></profileDesc></teiHeader></istex:fulltextTEI><json:item><extension>txt</extension><original>false</original><mimetype>text/plain</mimetype><uri>https://api.istex.fr/document/FD13B9FB7C3F64D5450288B6C019FA2A0AB58B3A/fulltext/txt</uri></json:item></fulltext><metadata><istex:metadataXml wicri:clean="Wiley, elements deleted: body"><istex:xmlDeclaration>version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" standalone="yes"</istex:xmlDeclaration><istex:document><component version="2.0" type="serialArticle" xml:lang="en"><header><publicationMeta level="product"><publisherInfo><publisherName>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</publisherName><publisherLoc>Oxford, UK</publisherLoc></publisherInfo><doi origin="wiley" registered="yes">10.1111/(ISSN)1600-0501</doi><issn type="print">0905-7161</issn><issn type="electronic">1600-0501</issn><idGroup><id type="product" value="CLR"></id><id type="publisherDivision" value="ST"></id></idGroup><titleGroup><title type="main" sort="CLINICAL ORAL IMPLANTS RESEARCH">Clinical Oral Implants Research</title></titleGroup></publicationMeta><publicationMeta level="part" position="04004"><doi origin="wiley">10.1111/clr.2009.20.issue-4</doi><numberingGroup><numbering type="journalVolume" number="20">20</numbering><numbering type="journalIssue" number="4">4</numbering></numberingGroup><coverDate startDate="2009-04">April 2009</coverDate></publicationMeta><publicationMeta level="unit" type="article" position="12" status="forIssue"><doi origin="wiley">10.1111/j.1600-0501.2008.01664.x</doi><idGroup><id type="unit" value="CLR1664"></id><id type="supplier" value="1664"></id></idGroup><countGroup><count type="pageTotal" number="8"></count></countGroup><titleGroup><title type="tocHeading1">Original Articles</title></titleGroup><copyright>© 2009 The Authors. Journal compilation © 2009 John Wiley & Sons A/S</copyright><eventGroup><event type="firstOnline" date="2009-03-11"></event><event type="publishedOnlineFinalForm" date="2009-03-11"></event><event type="xmlConverted" agent="Converter:BPG_TO_WML3G version:2.3.2 mode:FullText source:FullText result:FullText" date="2010-03-15"></event><event type="xmlConverted" agent="Converter:WILEY_ML3G_TO_WILEY_ML3GV2 version:4.0.1" date="2014-03-12"></event><event type="xmlConverted" agent="Converter:WML3G_To_WML3G version:4.1.7 mode:FullText,remove_FC" date="2014-10-17"></event></eventGroup><numberingGroup><numbering type="pageFirst" number="406">406</numbering><numbering type="pageLast" number="413">413</numbering></numberingGroup><correspondenceTo><b>Correspondence to:</b>
<i>M. Quirynen</i>
Department of Periodontology
Catholic University Leuven
Kapucijnenvoer 33
B‐3000 Leuven
Belgium
Tel.: +32 16 33 2485
Fax: +32 16 33 2484
e‐mail: <email normalForm="marc.quirynen@med.kuleuven.ac.be">marc.quirynen@med.kuleuven.ac.be</email></correspondenceTo><linkGroup><link type="toTypesetVersion" href="file:CLR.CLR1664.pdf"></link></linkGroup></publicationMeta><contentMeta><unparsedEditorialHistory><b>Date:</b> Accepted 29 September 2008</unparsedEditorialHistory><countGroup><count type="figureTotal" number="4"></count><count type="tableTotal" number="2"></count><count type="formulaTotal" number="0"></count><count type="referenceTotal" number="36"></count><count type="wordTotal" number="7639"></count><count type="linksCrossRef" number="39"></count></countGroup><titleGroup><title type="main">Successful outcome of splinted implants supporting a ‘planned’ maxillary overdenture: a retrospective evaluation and comparison with fixed full dental prostheses</title><title type="shortAuthors">Sanna et al.</title><title type="short">Implants supporting overdenture maxilla</title></titleGroup><creators><creator creatorRole="author" xml:id="cr1" affiliationRef="#a1"><personName><givenNames>A.</givenNames><familyName>Sanna</familyName></personName></creator><creator creatorRole="author" xml:id="cr2" affiliationRef="#a2"><personName><givenNames>P.</givenNames><familyName>Nuytens</familyName></personName></creator><creator creatorRole="author" xml:id="cr3" affiliationRef="#a2"><personName><givenNames>I.</givenNames><familyName>Naert</familyName></personName></creator><creator creatorRole="author" xml:id="cr4" affiliationRef="#a1"><personName><givenNames>M.</givenNames><familyName>Quirynen</familyName></personName></creator></creators><affiliationGroup><affiliation xml:id="a1" countryCode="BE"><unparsedAffiliation>Department of Periodontology, Catholic University Leuven, Leuven, Belgium</unparsedAffiliation></affiliation><affiliation xml:id="a2" countryCode="BE"><unparsedAffiliation>Department of Prosthetic Dentistry, Catholic University Leuven, Leuven, Belgium</unparsedAffiliation></affiliation></affiliationGroup><keywordGroup xml:lang="en"><keyword xml:id="k1">attachment loss</keyword><keyword xml:id="k2">bone loss</keyword><keyword xml:id="k3">implants</keyword><keyword xml:id="k4">implant success</keyword><keyword xml:id="k5">maxilla</keyword><keyword xml:id="k6">overdenture</keyword><keyword xml:id="k7">peri‐implantitis</keyword><keyword xml:id="k8">survival</keyword><keyword xml:id="k9">susceptibility</keyword></keywordGroup><abstractGroup><abstract type="main" xml:lang="en"><title type="main">Abstract</title><p><b>Objective: </b> Whereas an overdenture concept is generally accepted for the mandible, the outcome of this therapy for the maxilla remains less documented. This retrospective analysis evaluated the peri‐implant parameters of implants supporting a ‘planned’ overdenture in the maxilla, and compared these data with those of an age‐matched control group, with a fixed full dental prosthesis.</p><p><b>Material and methods: </b> All patients with an implant‐supported overdenture in the maxilla from the Leuven University Hospital (at least 12 months in function) were recalled for a thorough examination. Forty‐four patients (162 implants, Brånemark type) could be enrolled.</p><p><b>Results: </b> The mean loading time was 9 years (range: >1 to >20 years). The cumulative survival rate after 10 years of function was 99.3% if four to six interconnected implants supported the overdenture, but only 85.7% in case two non‐connected implants were used as support. The marginal bone level in the former group remained stable, with changes comparable with those observed for implants supporting fixed full dental prostheses.</p><p><b>Conclusions: </b> These results fully support the overdenture treatment concept for the maxilla, at least when ≥4 splinted implants are used.</p><!--
To cite this article:
Sanna A, Nuytens P, Naert I, Quirynen M. Successful outcome of splinted implants supporting ‘planned’ maxillary overdenture: a retrospective evaluation and comparison with fixed full dental prostheses.
Clin. Oral Impl. Res. 20, 2009; 406–413.
doi: 10.1111/j.1600-0501.2008.01664.x
--></abstract></abstractGroup></contentMeta></header></component></istex:document></istex:metadataXml><mods version="3.6"><titleInfo lang="en"><title>Successful outcome of splinted implants supporting a ‘planned’ maxillary overdenture: a retrospective evaluation and comparison with fixed full dental prostheses</title></titleInfo><titleInfo type="abbreviated" lang="en"><title>Implants supporting overdenture maxilla</title></titleInfo><titleInfo type="alternative" contentType="CDATA" lang="en"><title>Successful outcome of splinted implants supporting a ‘planned’ maxillary overdenture: a retrospective evaluation and comparison with fixed full dental prostheses</title></titleInfo><name type="personal"><namePart type="given">A.</namePart><namePart type="family">Sanna</namePart><affiliation>Department of Periodontology, Catholic University Leuven, Leuven, Belgium</affiliation><role><roleTerm type="text">author</roleTerm></role></name><name type="personal"><namePart type="given">P.</namePart><namePart type="family">Nuytens</namePart><affiliation>Department of Prosthetic Dentistry, Catholic University Leuven, Leuven, Belgium</affiliation><role><roleTerm type="text">author</roleTerm></role></name><name type="personal"><namePart type="given">I.</namePart><namePart type="family">Naert</namePart><affiliation>Department of Prosthetic Dentistry, Catholic University Leuven, Leuven, Belgium</affiliation><role><roleTerm type="text">author</roleTerm></role></name><name type="personal"><namePart type="given">M.</namePart><namePart type="family">Quirynen</namePart><affiliation>Department of Periodontology, Catholic University Leuven, Leuven, Belgium</affiliation><role><roleTerm type="text">author</roleTerm></role></name><typeOfResource>text</typeOfResource><genre type="article" displayLabel="article" authority="ISTEX" authorityURI="https://content-type.data.istex.fr" valueURI="https://content-type.data.istex.fr/ark:/67375/XTP-6N5SZHKN-D">article</genre><originInfo><publisher>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</publisher><place><placeTerm type="text">Oxford, UK</placeTerm></place><dateIssued encoding="w3cdtf">2009-04</dateIssued><edition>Date: Accepted 29 September 2008</edition><copyrightDate encoding="w3cdtf">2009</copyrightDate></originInfo><language><languageTerm type="code" authority="rfc3066">en</languageTerm><languageTerm type="code" authority="iso639-2b">eng</languageTerm></language><physicalDescription><extent unit="figures">4</extent><extent unit="tables">2</extent><extent unit="formulas">0</extent><extent unit="references">36</extent><extent unit="linksCrossRef">39</extent><extent unit="words">7639</extent></physicalDescription><abstract>Objective: Whereas an overdenture concept is generally accepted for the mandible, the outcome of this therapy for the maxilla remains less documented. This retrospective analysis evaluated the peri‐implant parameters of implants supporting a ‘planned’ overdenture in the maxilla, and compared these data with those of an age‐matched control group, with a fixed full dental prosthesis.</abstract><abstract>Material and methods: All patients with an implant‐supported overdenture in the maxilla from the Leuven University Hospital (at least 12 months in function) were recalled for a thorough examination. Forty‐four patients (162 implants, Brånemark type) could be enrolled.</abstract><abstract>Results: The mean loading time was 9 years (range: >1 to >20 years). The cumulative survival rate after 10 years of function was 99.3% if four to six interconnected implants supported the overdenture, but only 85.7% in case two non‐connected implants were used as support. The marginal bone level in the former group remained stable, with changes comparable with those observed for implants supporting fixed full dental prostheses.</abstract><abstract>Conclusions: These results fully support the overdenture treatment concept for the maxilla, at least when ≥4 splinted implants are used.</abstract><subject lang="en"><genre>keywords</genre><topic>attachment loss</topic><topic>bone loss</topic><topic>implants</topic><topic>implant success</topic><topic>maxilla</topic><topic>overdenture</topic><topic>peri‐implantitis</topic><topic>survival</topic><topic>susceptibility</topic></subject><relatedItem type="host"><titleInfo><title>Clinical Oral Implants Research</title></titleInfo><genre type="journal" authority="ISTEX" authorityURI="https://publication-type.data.istex.fr" valueURI="https://publication-type.data.istex.fr/ark:/67375/JMC-0GLKJH51-B">journal</genre><identifier type="ISSN">0905-7161</identifier><identifier type="eISSN">1600-0501</identifier><identifier type="DOI">10.1111/(ISSN)1600-0501</identifier><identifier type="PublisherID">CLR</identifier><part><date>2009</date><detail type="volume"><caption>vol.</caption><number>20</number></detail><detail type="issue"><caption>no.</caption><number>4</number></detail><extent unit="pages"><start>406</start><end>413</end><total>8</total></extent></part></relatedItem><identifier type="istex">FD13B9FB7C3F64D5450288B6C019FA2A0AB58B3A</identifier><identifier type="ark">ark:/67375/WNG-TLPPQ411-K</identifier><identifier type="DOI">10.1111/j.1600-0501.2008.01664.x</identifier><identifier type="ArticleID">CLR1664</identifier><accessCondition type="use and reproduction" contentType="copyright">© 2009 The Authors. Journal compilation © 2009 John Wiley & Sons A/S</accessCondition><recordInfo><recordContentSource authority="ISTEX" authorityURI="https://loaded-corpus.data.istex.fr" valueURI="https://loaded-corpus.data.istex.fr/ark:/67375/XBH-L0C46X92-X">wiley</recordContentSource><recordOrigin>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</recordOrigin></recordInfo></mods><json:item><extension>json</extension><original>false</original><mimetype>application/json</mimetype><uri>https://api.istex.fr/document/FD13B9FB7C3F64D5450288B6C019FA2A0AB58B3A/metadata/json</uri></json:item></metadata><serie></serie></istex></record>Pour manipuler ce document sous Unix (Dilib)
EXPLOR_STEP=$WICRI_ROOT/Wicri/Santé/explor/EdenteV2/Data/Istex/Corpus
HfdSelect -h $EXPLOR_STEP/biblio.hfd -nk 007D25 | SxmlIndent | more
Ou
HfdSelect -h $EXPLOR_AREA/Data/Istex/Corpus/biblio.hfd -nk 007D25 | SxmlIndent | more
Pour mettre un lien sur cette page dans le réseau Wicri
{{Explor lien
|wiki= Wicri/Santé
|area= EdenteV2
|flux= Istex
|étape= Corpus
|type= RBID
|clé= ISTEX:FD13B9FB7C3F64D5450288B6C019FA2A0AB58B3A
|texte= Successful outcome of splinted implants supporting a ‘planned’ maxillary overdenture: a retrospective evaluation and comparison with fixed full dental prostheses
}}
| This area was generated with Dilib version V0.6.32. |  |