The Effects of Superficial Roughness and Design on the Primary Stability of Dental Implants
Identifieur interne : 007C53 ( Istex/Corpus ); précédent : 007C52; suivant : 007C54The Effects of Superficial Roughness and Design on the Primary Stability of Dental Implants
Auteurs : Mychelle Vianna Dos Santos ; Carlos Nelson Elias ; Jose Henrique Cavalcanti LimaSource :
- Clinical Implant Dentistry and Related Research [ 1523-0899 ] ; 2011-09.
English descriptors
- KwdEn :
- Anodized, Bone density, Carlos nelson elias, Clinical implant dentistry, Conical, Conical implant, Contact area, Cortical bone, Cylindrical drill, Cylindrical implant, Cylindrical implants, Dental implant, Dental implants, Fastening screws, Greater roughness, Higher friction, Highest insertion torque, Hmwpe, Hmwpe cylinder, Hmwpe cylinders, Homogeneous material, Immediate loading, Implant, Implant design, Implant geometry, Implant insertion, Implant placement, Implant stability, Implant stability quotient, Implant stabilization, Implant surface, Implant surface morphology, Implant surface treatment, Implant surface treatments, Implant surfaces, Implant thread geometry, Insertion, Insertion torque, Insertion torque increases, Insertion torques, Instituto militar, Integration diagnostics, Larger insertion torque, Machined, Machined implants, Maxillofac, Maximum implant insertion torque, Mechanical properties, More parts, Morphology, Nishing, Nishing surface, Nobel biocare, Oral maxillofac implants, Osstell mentor, Pilot drill, Present work, Primary stability, Resonance frequency, Resonance frequency analysis, Resonance frequency measurements, Roughness, Roughness parameters, Statistical analysis, Surface area, Surface morphology, Surface roughness, Surface treatment, Surface treatments, Surgical, Surgical protocol, Thread form, Thread geometry, Torque, Weight polyethylene.
- Teeft :
- Anodized, Bone density, Carlos nelson elias, Clinical implant dentistry, Conical, Conical implant, Contact area, Cortical bone, Cylindrical drill, Cylindrical implant, Cylindrical implants, Dental implant, Dental implants, Fastening screws, Greater roughness, Higher friction, Highest insertion torque, Hmwpe, Hmwpe cylinder, Hmwpe cylinders, Homogeneous material, Immediate loading, Implant, Implant design, Implant geometry, Implant insertion, Implant placement, Implant stability, Implant stability quotient, Implant stabilization, Implant surface, Implant surface morphology, Implant surface treatment, Implant surface treatments, Implant surfaces, Implant thread geometry, Insertion, Insertion torque, Insertion torque increases, Insertion torques, Instituto militar, Integration diagnostics, Larger insertion torque, Machined, Machined implants, Maxillofac, Maximum implant insertion torque, Mechanical properties, More parts, Morphology, Nishing, Nishing surface, Nobel biocare, Oral maxillofac implants, Osstell mentor, Pilot drill, Present work, Primary stability, Resonance frequency, Resonance frequency analysis, Resonance frequency measurements, Roughness, Roughness parameters, Statistical analysis, Surface area, Surface morphology, Surface roughness, Surface treatment, Surface treatments, Surgical, Surgical protocol, Thread form, Thread geometry, Torque, Weight polyethylene.
Abstract
Background: Primary implant stability has been used as an indicator for future osseointegration and whether an immediate/early loading protocol should be applied. Implant stability is the key to clinical success.
Url:
DOI: 10.1111/j.1708-8208.2009.00202.x
Links to Exploration step
ISTEX:FBBCB3694511D235E27CF4114620017CDA5D5D7DLe document en format XML
<record><TEI wicri:istexFullTextTei="biblStruct"><teiHeader><fileDesc><titleStmt><title xml:lang="en">The Effects of Superficial Roughness and Design on the Primary Stability of Dental Implants</title><author><name sortKey="Dos Santos, Mychelle Vianna" sort="Dos Santos, Mychelle Vianna" uniqKey="Dos Santos M" first="Mychelle Vianna" last="Dos Santos">Mychelle Vianna Dos Santos</name><affiliation><mods:affiliation>Biomaterials Laboratory, Instituto Militar de Engenharia, Rio de Janeiro, RJ, Brazil;</mods:affiliation></affiliation></author><author><name sortKey="Elias, Carlos Nelson" sort="Elias, Carlos Nelson" uniqKey="Elias C" first="Carlos Nelson" last="Elias">Carlos Nelson Elias</name><affiliation><mods:affiliation>Biomaterials Laboratory, Instituto Militar de Engenharia, Rio de Janeiro, RJ, Brazil;</mods:affiliation></affiliation><affiliation><mods:affiliation>E-mail: elias@ime.eb.br</mods:affiliation></affiliation></author><author><name sortKey="Cavalcanti Lima, Jose Henrique" sort="Cavalcanti Lima, Jose Henrique" uniqKey="Cavalcanti Lima J" first="Jose Henrique" last="Cavalcanti Lima">Jose Henrique Cavalcanti Lima</name><affiliation><mods:affiliation>INCO25 Av Rio Branco 124, Rio de Janeiro, RJ, Brazil</mods:affiliation></affiliation></author></titleStmt><publicationStmt><idno type="wicri:source">ISTEX</idno><idno type="RBID">ISTEX:FBBCB3694511D235E27CF4114620017CDA5D5D7D</idno><date when="2011" year="2011">2011</date><idno type="doi">10.1111/j.1708-8208.2009.00202.x</idno><idno type="url">https://api.istex.fr/document/FBBCB3694511D235E27CF4114620017CDA5D5D7D/fulltext/pdf</idno><idno type="wicri:Area/Istex/Corpus">007C53</idno><idno type="wicri:explorRef" wicri:stream="Istex" wicri:step="Corpus" wicri:corpus="ISTEX">007C53</idno></publicationStmt><sourceDesc><biblStruct><analytic><title level="a" type="main">The Effects of Superficial Roughness and Design on the Primary Stability of Dental Implants</title><author><name sortKey="Dos Santos, Mychelle Vianna" sort="Dos Santos, Mychelle Vianna" uniqKey="Dos Santos M" first="Mychelle Vianna" last="Dos Santos">Mychelle Vianna Dos Santos</name><affiliation><mods:affiliation>Biomaterials Laboratory, Instituto Militar de Engenharia, Rio de Janeiro, RJ, Brazil;</mods:affiliation></affiliation></author><author><name sortKey="Elias, Carlos Nelson" sort="Elias, Carlos Nelson" uniqKey="Elias C" first="Carlos Nelson" last="Elias">Carlos Nelson Elias</name><affiliation><mods:affiliation>Biomaterials Laboratory, Instituto Militar de Engenharia, Rio de Janeiro, RJ, Brazil;</mods:affiliation></affiliation><affiliation><mods:affiliation>E-mail: elias@ime.eb.br</mods:affiliation></affiliation></author><author><name sortKey="Cavalcanti Lima, Jose Henrique" sort="Cavalcanti Lima, Jose Henrique" uniqKey="Cavalcanti Lima J" first="Jose Henrique" last="Cavalcanti Lima">Jose Henrique Cavalcanti Lima</name><affiliation><mods:affiliation>INCO25 Av Rio Branco 124, Rio de Janeiro, RJ, Brazil</mods:affiliation></affiliation></author></analytic><monogr></monogr><series><title level="j" type="main">Clinical Implant Dentistry and Related Research</title><title level="j" type="alt">CLINICAL IMPLANT DENTISTRY RELATED RESEARCH</title><idno type="ISSN">1523-0899</idno><idno type="eISSN">1708-8208</idno><imprint><biblScope unit="vol">13</biblScope><biblScope unit="issue">3</biblScope><biblScope unit="page" from="215">215</biblScope><biblScope unit="page" to="223">223</biblScope><biblScope unit="page-count">9</biblScope><publisher>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</publisher><pubPlace>Oxford, UK</pubPlace><date type="published" when="2011-09">2011-09</date></imprint><idno type="ISSN">1523-0899</idno></series></biblStruct></sourceDesc><seriesStmt><idno type="ISSN">1523-0899</idno></seriesStmt></fileDesc><profileDesc><textClass><keywords scheme="KwdEn" xml:lang="en"><term>Anodized</term><term>Bone density</term><term>Carlos nelson elias</term><term>Clinical implant dentistry</term><term>Conical</term><term>Conical implant</term><term>Contact area</term><term>Cortical bone</term><term>Cylindrical drill</term><term>Cylindrical implant</term><term>Cylindrical implants</term><term>Dental implant</term><term>Dental implants</term><term>Fastening screws</term><term>Greater roughness</term><term>Higher friction</term><term>Highest insertion torque</term><term>Hmwpe</term><term>Hmwpe cylinder</term><term>Hmwpe cylinders</term><term>Homogeneous material</term><term>Immediate loading</term><term>Implant</term><term>Implant design</term><term>Implant geometry</term><term>Implant insertion</term><term>Implant placement</term><term>Implant stability</term><term>Implant stability quotient</term><term>Implant stabilization</term><term>Implant surface</term><term>Implant surface morphology</term><term>Implant surface treatment</term><term>Implant surface treatments</term><term>Implant surfaces</term><term>Implant thread geometry</term><term>Insertion</term><term>Insertion torque</term><term>Insertion torque increases</term><term>Insertion torques</term><term>Instituto militar</term><term>Integration diagnostics</term><term>Larger insertion torque</term><term>Machined</term><term>Machined implants</term><term>Maxillofac</term><term>Maximum implant insertion torque</term><term>Mechanical properties</term><term>More parts</term><term>Morphology</term><term>Nishing</term><term>Nishing surface</term><term>Nobel biocare</term><term>Oral maxillofac implants</term><term>Osstell mentor</term><term>Pilot drill</term><term>Present work</term><term>Primary stability</term><term>Resonance frequency</term><term>Resonance frequency analysis</term><term>Resonance frequency measurements</term><term>Roughness</term><term>Roughness parameters</term><term>Statistical analysis</term><term>Surface area</term><term>Surface morphology</term><term>Surface roughness</term><term>Surface treatment</term><term>Surface treatments</term><term>Surgical</term><term>Surgical protocol</term><term>Thread form</term><term>Thread geometry</term><term>Torque</term><term>Weight polyethylene</term></keywords><keywords scheme="Teeft" xml:lang="en"><term>Anodized</term><term>Bone density</term><term>Carlos nelson elias</term><term>Clinical implant dentistry</term><term>Conical</term><term>Conical implant</term><term>Contact area</term><term>Cortical bone</term><term>Cylindrical drill</term><term>Cylindrical implant</term><term>Cylindrical implants</term><term>Dental implant</term><term>Dental implants</term><term>Fastening screws</term><term>Greater roughness</term><term>Higher friction</term><term>Highest insertion torque</term><term>Hmwpe</term><term>Hmwpe cylinder</term><term>Hmwpe cylinders</term><term>Homogeneous material</term><term>Immediate loading</term><term>Implant</term><term>Implant design</term><term>Implant geometry</term><term>Implant insertion</term><term>Implant placement</term><term>Implant stability</term><term>Implant stability quotient</term><term>Implant stabilization</term><term>Implant surface</term><term>Implant surface morphology</term><term>Implant surface treatment</term><term>Implant surface treatments</term><term>Implant surfaces</term><term>Implant thread geometry</term><term>Insertion</term><term>Insertion torque</term><term>Insertion torque increases</term><term>Insertion torques</term><term>Instituto militar</term><term>Integration diagnostics</term><term>Larger insertion torque</term><term>Machined</term><term>Machined implants</term><term>Maxillofac</term><term>Maximum implant insertion torque</term><term>Mechanical properties</term><term>More parts</term><term>Morphology</term><term>Nishing</term><term>Nishing surface</term><term>Nobel biocare</term><term>Oral maxillofac implants</term><term>Osstell mentor</term><term>Pilot drill</term><term>Present work</term><term>Primary stability</term><term>Resonance frequency</term><term>Resonance frequency analysis</term><term>Resonance frequency measurements</term><term>Roughness</term><term>Roughness parameters</term><term>Statistical analysis</term><term>Surface area</term><term>Surface morphology</term><term>Surface roughness</term><term>Surface treatment</term><term>Surface treatments</term><term>Surgical</term><term>Surgical protocol</term><term>Thread form</term><term>Thread geometry</term><term>Torque</term><term>Weight polyethylene</term></keywords></textClass></profileDesc></teiHeader><front><div type="abstract">Background: Primary implant stability has been used as an indicator for future osseointegration and whether an immediate/early loading protocol should be applied. Implant stability is the key to clinical success.</div></front></TEI><istex><corpusName>wiley</corpusName><keywords><teeft><json:string>implant</json:string><json:string>insertion</json:string><json:string>insertion torque</json:string><json:string>primary stability</json:string><json:string>conical</json:string><json:string>machined</json:string><json:string>hmwpe</json:string><json:string>resonance frequency</json:string><json:string>implant design</json:string><json:string>dental implants</json:string><json:string>anodized</json:string><json:string>maxillofac</json:string><json:string>oral maxillofac implants</json:string><json:string>nishing</json:string><json:string>cylindrical implant</json:string><json:string>torque</json:string><json:string>conical implant</json:string><json:string>present work</json:string><json:string>implant insertion</json:string><json:string>surface roughness</json:string><json:string>surface morphology</json:string><json:string>surface treatment</json:string><json:string>implant geometry</json:string><json:string>implant stability</json:string><json:string>dental implant</json:string><json:string>machined implants</json:string><json:string>clinical implant dentistry</json:string><json:string>immediate loading</json:string><json:string>maximum implant insertion torque</json:string><json:string>implant stability quotient</json:string><json:string>resonance frequency analysis</json:string><json:string>surgical</json:string><json:string>roughness</json:string><json:string>osstell mentor</json:string><json:string>thread geometry</json:string><json:string>higher friction</json:string><json:string>integration diagnostics</json:string><json:string>hmwpe cylinder</json:string><json:string>hmwpe cylinders</json:string><json:string>resonance frequency measurements</json:string><json:string>homogeneous material</json:string><json:string>morphology</json:string><json:string>larger insertion torque</json:string><json:string>highest insertion torque</json:string><json:string>greater roughness</json:string><json:string>implant surface morphology</json:string><json:string>surface treatments</json:string><json:string>surgical protocol</json:string><json:string>cortical bone</json:string><json:string>mechanical properties</json:string><json:string>implant surface treatments</json:string><json:string>thread form</json:string><json:string>roughness parameters</json:string><json:string>implant surface</json:string><json:string>implant stabilization</json:string><json:string>insertion torque increases</json:string><json:string>pilot drill</json:string><json:string>cylindrical drill</json:string><json:string>nobel biocare</json:string><json:string>nishing surface</json:string><json:string>implant placement</json:string><json:string>statistical analysis</json:string><json:string>instituto militar</json:string><json:string>surface area</json:string><json:string>cylindrical implants</json:string><json:string>implant thread geometry</json:string><json:string>implant surfaces</json:string><json:string>weight polyethylene</json:string><json:string>implant surface treatment</json:string><json:string>insertion torques</json:string><json:string>contact area</json:string><json:string>fastening screws</json:string><json:string>more parts</json:string><json:string>carlos nelson elias</json:string><json:string>bone density</json:string></teeft></keywords><author><json:item><name>Mychelle Vianna dos Santos MSc</name><affiliations><json:string>Biomaterials Laboratory, Instituto Militar de Engenharia, Rio de Janeiro, RJ, Brazil;</json:string></affiliations></json:item><json:item><name>Carlos Nelson Elias DSc</name><affiliations><json:string>Biomaterials Laboratory, Instituto Militar de Engenharia, Rio de Janeiro, RJ, Brazil;</json:string><json:string>E-mail: elias@ime.eb.br</json:string></affiliations></json:item><json:item><name>Jose Henrique Cavalcanti Lima DDS</name><affiliations><json:string>INCO25 Av Rio Branco 124, Rio de Janeiro, RJ, Brazil</json:string></affiliations></json:item></author><subject><json:item><lang><json:string>eng</json:string></lang><value>implants</value></json:item><json:item><lang><json:string>eng</json:string></lang><value>insertion torque</value></json:item><json:item><lang><json:string>eng</json:string></lang><value>primary stability</value></json:item><json:item><lang><json:string>eng</json:string></lang><value>resonance frequency analysis</value></json:item></subject><articleId><json:string>CID202</json:string></articleId><arkIstex>ark:/67375/WNG-PX4NTLFD-R</arkIstex><language><json:string>eng</json:string></language><originalGenre><json:string>article</json:string></originalGenre><abstract>Background: Primary implant stability has been used as an indicator for future osseointegration and whether an immediate/early loading protocol should be applied. Implant stability is the key to clinical success.</abstract><qualityIndicators><score>6.104</score><pdfWordCount>3744</pdfWordCount><pdfCharCount>23772</pdfCharCount><pdfVersion>1.3</pdfVersion><pdfPageCount>9</pdfPageCount><pdfPageSize>585 x 783 pts</pdfPageSize><refBibsNative>true</refBibsNative><abstractWordCount>30</abstractWordCount><abstractCharCount>212</abstractCharCount><keywordCount>4</keywordCount></qualityIndicators><title>The Effects of Superficial Roughness and Design on the Primary Stability of Dental Implants</title><pmid><json:string>19744197</json:string></pmid><genre><json:string>article</json:string></genre><host><title>Clinical Implant Dentistry and Related Research</title><language><json:string>unknown</json:string></language><doi><json:string>10.1111/(ISSN)1708-8208</json:string></doi><issn><json:string>1523-0899</json:string></issn><eissn><json:string>1708-8208</json:string></eissn><publisherId><json:string>CID</json:string></publisherId><volume>13</volume><issue>3</issue><pages><first>215</first><last>223</last><total>9</total></pages><genre><json:string>journal</json:string></genre></host><namedEntities><unitex><date><json:string>2011</json:string></date><geogName></geogName><orgName><json:string>Lutron Electronic Enterprise Co., Taipei, Taiwan</json:string><json:string>Related Research, Volume</json:string><json:string>Integration Diagnostics</json:string></orgName><orgName_funder></orgName_funder><orgName_provider></orgName_provider><persName><json:string>Jose Henrique</json:string><json:string>Meredith</json:string><json:string>Elias</json:string><json:string>Huang</json:string></persName><placeName><json:string>Germany</json:string><json:string>Brazil</json:string><json:string>Rio de Janeiro</json:string><json:string>France</json:string><json:string>Sweden</json:string><json:string>São Paulo</json:string></placeName><ref_url></ref_url><ref_bibl></ref_bibl><bibl></bibl></unitex></namedEntities><ark><json:string>ark:/67375/WNG-PX4NTLFD-R</json:string></ark><categories><wos><json:string>1 - science</json:string><json:string>2 - dentistry, oral surgery & medicine</json:string></wos><scienceMetrix><json:string>1 - health sciences</json:string><json:string>2 - clinical medicine</json:string><json:string>3 - dentistry</json:string></scienceMetrix><scopus><json:string>1 - Health Sciences</json:string><json:string>2 - Dentistry</json:string><json:string>3 - General Dentistry</json:string><json:string>1 - Health Sciences</json:string><json:string>2 - Dentistry</json:string><json:string>3 - Oral Surgery</json:string></scopus></categories><publicationDate>2011</publicationDate><copyrightDate>2011</copyrightDate><doi><json:string>10.1111/j.1708-8208.2009.00202.x</json:string></doi><id>FBBCB3694511D235E27CF4114620017CDA5D5D7D</id><score>1</score><fulltext><json:item><extension>pdf</extension><original>true</original><mimetype>application/pdf</mimetype><uri>https://api.istex.fr/document/FBBCB3694511D235E27CF4114620017CDA5D5D7D/fulltext/pdf</uri></json:item><json:item><extension>zip</extension><original>false</original><mimetype>application/zip</mimetype><uri>https://api.istex.fr/document/FBBCB3694511D235E27CF4114620017CDA5D5D7D/fulltext/zip</uri></json:item><istex:fulltextTEI uri="https://api.istex.fr/document/FBBCB3694511D235E27CF4114620017CDA5D5D7D/fulltext/tei"><teiHeader><fileDesc><titleStmt><title level="a" type="main">The Effects of Superficial Roughness and Design on the Primary Stability of Dental Implants</title></titleStmt><publicationStmt><authority>ISTEX</authority><publisher>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</publisher><pubPlace>Oxford, UK</pubPlace><availability><licence>© 2009 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.</licence></availability><date type="published" when="2011-09"></date></publicationStmt><notesStmt><note type="content-type" subtype="article" source="article" scheme="https://content-type.data.istex.fr/ark:/67375/XTP-6N5SZHKN-D">article</note><note type="publication-type" subtype="journal" scheme="https://publication-type.data.istex.fr/ark:/67375/JMC-0GLKJH51-B">journal</note></notesStmt><sourceDesc><biblStruct type="article"><analytic><title level="a" type="main">The Effects of Superficial Roughness and Design on the Primary Stability of Dental Implants</title><title level="a" type="short">Primary Stability of Dental Implant</title><author xml:id="author-0000"><persName><forename type="first">Mychelle Vianna</forename><surname>dos Santos</surname><roleName type="degree">MSc</roleName></persName><affiliation>Biomaterials Laboratory, Instituto Militar de Engenharia, Rio de Janeiro, RJ, Brazil;<address><country key="BR"></country></address></affiliation></author><author xml:id="author-0001" role="corresp"><persName><forename type="first">Carlos Nelson</forename><surname>Elias</surname><roleName type="degree">DSc</roleName></persName><affiliation>Biomaterials Laboratory, Instituto Militar de Engenharia, Rio de Janeiro, RJ, Brazil;<address><country key="BR"></country></address></affiliation><affiliation>Dr. Carlos Nelson Elias, Biomaterials Laboratory, Instituto Militar de Engenharia, Pr Gen Tibúrcio 80, Rio de Janeiro 22290 270, RJ, Brazil; e‐mail: elias@ime.eb.br</affiliation></author><author xml:id="author-0002"><persName><forename type="first">Jose Henrique</forename><surname>Cavalcanti Lima</surname><roleName type="degree">DDS</roleName></persName><affiliation>INCO25 Av Rio Branco 124, Rio de Janeiro, RJ, Brazil<address><country key="BR"></country></address></affiliation></author><idno type="istex">FBBCB3694511D235E27CF4114620017CDA5D5D7D</idno><idno type="ark">ark:/67375/WNG-PX4NTLFD-R</idno><idno type="DOI">10.1111/j.1708-8208.2009.00202.x</idno><idno type="unit">CID202</idno><idno type="toTypesetVersion">file:CID.CID202.pdf</idno></analytic><monogr><title level="j" type="main">Clinical Implant Dentistry and Related Research</title><title level="j" type="alt">CLINICAL IMPLANT DENTISTRY RELATED RESEARCH</title><idno type="pISSN">1523-0899</idno><idno type="eISSN">1708-8208</idno><idno type="book-DOI">10.1111/(ISSN)1708-8208</idno><idno type="book-part-DOI">10.1111/cid.2011.13.issue-3</idno><idno type="product">CID</idno><idno type="publisherDivision">ST</idno><imprint><biblScope unit="vol">13</biblScope><biblScope unit="issue">3</biblScope><biblScope unit="page" from="215">215</biblScope><biblScope unit="page" to="223">223</biblScope><biblScope unit="page-count">9</biblScope><publisher>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</publisher><pubPlace>Oxford, UK</pubPlace><date type="published" when="2011-09"></date></imprint></monogr></biblStruct></sourceDesc></fileDesc><profileDesc><abstract xml:lang="en" style="main"><head>ABSTRACT</head><p><hi rend="bold">Background:</hi> Primary implant stability has been used as an indicator for future osseointegration and whether an immediate/early loading protocol should be applied. Implant stability is the key to clinical success.</p><p><hi rend="bold">Purpose:</hi> The aim of this work was to analyze the influence of the design and surface morphology on the primary stability of dental implants. The insertion torque and resonance frequency analysis (RFA) were the parameters used to measure the primary stability of the implants.</p><p><hi rend="bold">Materials and Methods:</hi> Thirty implants, divided in six groups of five samples were placed in cylinder of high molecular weight polyethylene. The groups were different upon two designs (cylindrical and conic) and three implant surfaces finishing (machined, acid etched, and anodized). The insertion torque was quantified by a digital torque driver (Lutron Electronic Enterprise Co., Taipei, Taiwan) and the resonance frequency was measured by Osstell mentor™ (Integration Diagnostics AB, Göteborg, Sweden). The implant surface morphology was characterized by scanning electron microscopy, roughness measurement, and friction coefficient.</p><p><hi rend="bold">Results:</hi> The machined implants showed smaller insertion torques than treated implant surfaces. There were no differences between the RFA measurements in all tested surfaces. Statistical analyses demonstrated no correlation between the dental implant insertion torque and primary stability measured by the RFA. The implants with treated surfaces showed greater roughness, a higher friction coefficient, and demanded a larger insertion torque than machined implants. The results of the surface roughness and friction coefficients are in accordance with the results of the insertion torque. The difference, across the insertion torque values, between conical and cylindrical implants, can be explained by the different contact surface area among the thread geometry of these implants.</p><p><hi rend="bold">Conclusion:</hi> The maximum implant insertion torque depends on the implant geometry, thread form, and implant surface morphology. The placement of conical implants with treated surfaces required the highest insertion torque. There was no correlation between RFA and insertion torque implant.</p></abstract><textClass><keywords xml:lang="en"><term xml:id="k1">implants</term><term xml:id="k2">insertion torque</term><term xml:id="k3">primary stability</term><term xml:id="k4">resonance frequency analysis</term></keywords><keywords rend="tocHeading1"><term>ARTICLES</term></keywords></textClass><langUsage><language ident="en"></language></langUsage></profileDesc></teiHeader></istex:fulltextTEI><json:item><extension>txt</extension><original>false</original><mimetype>text/plain</mimetype><uri>https://api.istex.fr/document/FBBCB3694511D235E27CF4114620017CDA5D5D7D/fulltext/txt</uri></json:item></fulltext><metadata><istex:metadataXml wicri:clean="Wiley, elements deleted: body"><istex:xmlDeclaration>version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" standalone="yes"</istex:xmlDeclaration><istex:document><component version="2.0" type="serialArticle" xml:lang="en"><header><publicationMeta level="product"><publisherInfo><publisherName>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</publisherName><publisherLoc>Oxford, UK</publisherLoc></publisherInfo><doi origin="wiley" registered="yes">10.1111/(ISSN)1708-8208</doi><issn type="print">1523-0899</issn><issn type="electronic">1708-8208</issn><idGroup><id type="product" value="CID"></id><id type="publisherDivision" value="ST"></id></idGroup><titleGroup><title type="main" sort="CLINICAL IMPLANT DENTISTRY RELATED RESEARCH">Clinical Implant Dentistry and Related Research</title></titleGroup></publicationMeta><publicationMeta level="part" position="09103"><doi origin="wiley">10.1111/cid.2011.13.issue-3</doi><numberingGroup><numbering type="journalVolume" number="13">13</numbering><numbering type="journalIssue" number="3">3</numbering></numberingGroup><coverDate startDate="2011-09">September 2011</coverDate></publicationMeta><publicationMeta level="unit" type="article" position="5" status="forIssue"><doi origin="wiley">10.1111/j.1708-8208.2009.00202.x</doi><idGroup><id type="unit" value="CID202"></id></idGroup><countGroup><count type="pageTotal" number="9"></count></countGroup><titleGroup><title type="tocHeading1">ARTICLES</title></titleGroup><copyright>© 2009 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.</copyright><eventGroup><event type="firstOnline" date="2009-09-09"></event><event type="publishedOnlineAcceptedOrEarlyUnpaginated" date="2009-09-09"></event><event type="xmlConverted" agent="Converter:BPG_TO_WML3G version:2.5.2 mode:FullText" date="2011-08-01"></event><event type="publishedOnlineFinalForm" date="2011-08-01"></event><event type="xmlConverted" agent="Converter:WILEY_ML3G_TO_WILEY_ML3GV2 version:3.8.8" date="2014-01-15"></event><event type="xmlConverted" agent="Converter:WML3G_To_WML3G version:4.1.7 mode:FullText,remove_FC" date="2014-10-16"></event></eventGroup><numberingGroup><numbering type="pageFirst" number="215">215</numbering><numbering type="pageLast" number="223">223</numbering></numberingGroup><correspondenceTo>Dr. Carlos Nelson Elias, Biomaterials Laboratory, Instituto Militar de Engenharia, Pr Gen Tibúrcio 80, Rio de Janeiro 22290 270, RJ, Brazil; e‐mail: <email>elias@ime.eb.br</email></correspondenceTo><linkGroup><link type="toTypesetVersion" href="file:CID.CID202.pdf"></link></linkGroup></publicationMeta><contentMeta><countGroup><count type="figureTotal" number="7"></count><count type="tableTotal" number="3"></count><count type="formulaTotal" number="0"></count><count type="referenceTotal" number="20"></count><count type="wordTotal" number="4268"></count><count type="linksPubMed" number="0"></count><count type="linksCrossRef" number="0"></count></countGroup><titleGroup><title type="main">The Effects of Superficial Roughness and Design on the Primary Stability of Dental Implants</title><title type="shortAuthors">Clinical Implant Dentistry and Related Research, Volume 13, Number 3, 2011</title><title type="short">Primary Stability of Dental Implant</title></titleGroup><creators><creator creatorRole="author" xml:id="cr1" affiliationRef="#a1"><personName><givenNames>Mychelle Vianna</givenNames><familyName>dos Santos</familyName><degrees>MSc</degrees></personName></creator><creator creatorRole="author" xml:id="cr2" affiliationRef="#a1" corresponding="yes"><personName><givenNames>Carlos Nelson</givenNames><familyName>Elias</familyName><degrees>DSc</degrees></personName></creator><creator creatorRole="author" xml:id="cr3" affiliationRef="#a2"><personName><givenNames>Jose Henrique</givenNames><familyName>Cavalcanti Lima</familyName><degrees>DDS</degrees></personName></creator></creators><affiliationGroup><affiliation xml:id="a1" countryCode="BR"><unparsedAffiliation>Biomaterials Laboratory, Instituto Militar de Engenharia, Rio de Janeiro, RJ, Brazil;</unparsedAffiliation></affiliation><affiliation xml:id="a2" countryCode="BR"><unparsedAffiliation>INCO25 Av Rio Branco 124, Rio de Janeiro, RJ, Brazil</unparsedAffiliation></affiliation></affiliationGroup><keywordGroup xml:lang="en"><keyword xml:id="k1">implants</keyword><keyword xml:id="k2">insertion torque</keyword><keyword xml:id="k3">primary stability</keyword><keyword xml:id="k4">resonance frequency analysis</keyword></keywordGroup><abstractGroup><abstract type="main" xml:lang="en"><title type="main">ABSTRACT</title><p><b>Background:</b> Primary implant stability has been used as an indicator for future osseointegration and whether an immediate/early loading protocol should be applied. Implant stability is the key to clinical success.</p><p><b>Purpose:</b> The aim of this work was to analyze the influence of the design and surface morphology on the primary stability of dental implants. The insertion torque and resonance frequency analysis (RFA) were the parameters used to measure the primary stability of the implants.</p><p><b>Materials and Methods:</b> Thirty implants, divided in six groups of five samples were placed in cylinder of high molecular weight polyethylene. The groups were different upon two designs (cylindrical and conic) and three implant surfaces finishing (machined, acid etched, and anodized). The insertion torque was quantified by a digital torque driver (Lutron Electronic Enterprise Co., Taipei, Taiwan) and the resonance frequency was measured by Osstell mentor™ (Integration Diagnostics AB, Göteborg, Sweden). The implant surface morphology was characterized by scanning electron microscopy, roughness measurement, and friction coefficient.</p><p><b>Results:</b> The machined implants showed smaller insertion torques than treated implant surfaces. There were no differences between the RFA measurements in all tested surfaces. Statistical analyses demonstrated no correlation between the dental implant insertion torque and primary stability measured by the RFA. The implants with treated surfaces showed greater roughness, a higher friction coefficient, and demanded a larger insertion torque than machined implants. The results of the surface roughness and friction coefficients are in accordance with the results of the insertion torque. The difference, across the insertion torque values, between conical and cylindrical implants, can be explained by the different contact surface area among the thread geometry of these implants.</p><p><b>Conclusion:</b> The maximum implant insertion torque depends on the implant geometry, thread form, and implant surface morphology. The placement of conical implants with treated surfaces required the highest insertion torque. There was no correlation between RFA and insertion torque implant.</p></abstract></abstractGroup></contentMeta></header></component></istex:document></istex:metadataXml><mods version="3.6"><titleInfo lang="en"><title>The Effects of Superficial Roughness and Design on the Primary Stability of Dental Implants</title></titleInfo><titleInfo type="abbreviated" lang="en"><title>Primary Stability of Dental Implant</title></titleInfo><titleInfo type="alternative" contentType="CDATA" lang="en"><title>The Effects of Superficial Roughness and Design on the Primary Stability of Dental Implants</title></titleInfo><name type="personal"><namePart type="given">Mychelle Vianna</namePart><namePart type="family">dos Santos</namePart><namePart type="termsOfAddress">MSc</namePart><affiliation>Biomaterials Laboratory, Instituto Militar de Engenharia, Rio de Janeiro, RJ, Brazil;</affiliation><role><roleTerm type="text">author</roleTerm></role></name><name type="personal"><namePart type="given">Carlos Nelson</namePart><namePart type="family">Elias</namePart><namePart type="termsOfAddress">DSc</namePart><affiliation>Biomaterials Laboratory, Instituto Militar de Engenharia, Rio de Janeiro, RJ, Brazil;</affiliation><affiliation>E-mail: elias@ime.eb.br</affiliation><role><roleTerm type="text">author</roleTerm></role></name><name type="personal"><namePart type="given">Jose Henrique</namePart><namePart type="family">Cavalcanti Lima</namePart><namePart type="termsOfAddress">DDS</namePart><affiliation>INCO25 Av Rio Branco 124, Rio de Janeiro, RJ, Brazil</affiliation><role><roleTerm type="text">author</roleTerm></role></name><typeOfResource>text</typeOfResource><genre type="article" displayLabel="article" authority="ISTEX" authorityURI="https://content-type.data.istex.fr" valueURI="https://content-type.data.istex.fr/ark:/67375/XTP-6N5SZHKN-D">article</genre><originInfo><publisher>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</publisher><place><placeTerm type="text">Oxford, UK</placeTerm></place><dateIssued encoding="w3cdtf">2011-09</dateIssued><copyrightDate encoding="w3cdtf">2011</copyrightDate></originInfo><language><languageTerm type="code" authority="rfc3066">en</languageTerm><languageTerm type="code" authority="iso639-2b">eng</languageTerm></language><physicalDescription><extent unit="figures">7</extent><extent unit="tables">3</extent><extent unit="formulas">0</extent><extent unit="references">20</extent><extent unit="linksCrossRef">0</extent><extent unit="words">4268</extent></physicalDescription><abstract>Background: Primary implant stability has been used as an indicator for future osseointegration and whether an immediate/early loading protocol should be applied. Implant stability is the key to clinical success.</abstract><abstract>Purpose: The aim of this work was to analyze the influence of the design and surface morphology on the primary stability of dental implants. The insertion torque and resonance frequency analysis (RFA) were the parameters used to measure the primary stability of the implants.</abstract><abstract>Materials and Methods: Thirty implants, divided in six groups of five samples were placed in cylinder of high molecular weight polyethylene. The groups were different upon two designs (cylindrical and conic) and three implant surfaces finishing (machined, acid etched, and anodized). The insertion torque was quantified by a digital torque driver (Lutron Electronic Enterprise Co., Taipei, Taiwan) and the resonance frequency was measured by Osstell mentor™ (Integration Diagnostics AB, Göteborg, Sweden). The implant surface morphology was characterized by scanning electron microscopy, roughness measurement, and friction coefficient.</abstract><abstract>Results: The machined implants showed smaller insertion torques than treated implant surfaces. There were no differences between the RFA measurements in all tested surfaces. Statistical analyses demonstrated no correlation between the dental implant insertion torque and primary stability measured by the RFA. The implants with treated surfaces showed greater roughness, a higher friction coefficient, and demanded a larger insertion torque than machined implants. The results of the surface roughness and friction coefficients are in accordance with the results of the insertion torque. The difference, across the insertion torque values, between conical and cylindrical implants, can be explained by the different contact surface area among the thread geometry of these implants.</abstract><abstract>Conclusion: The maximum implant insertion torque depends on the implant geometry, thread form, and implant surface morphology. The placement of conical implants with treated surfaces required the highest insertion torque. There was no correlation between RFA and insertion torque implant.</abstract><subject lang="en"><genre>keywords</genre><topic>implants</topic><topic>insertion torque</topic><topic>primary stability</topic><topic>resonance frequency analysis</topic></subject><relatedItem type="host"><titleInfo><title>Clinical Implant Dentistry and Related Research</title></titleInfo><genre type="journal" authority="ISTEX" authorityURI="https://publication-type.data.istex.fr" valueURI="https://publication-type.data.istex.fr/ark:/67375/JMC-0GLKJH51-B">journal</genre><identifier type="ISSN">1523-0899</identifier><identifier type="eISSN">1708-8208</identifier><identifier type="DOI">10.1111/(ISSN)1708-8208</identifier><identifier type="PublisherID">CID</identifier><part><date>2011</date><detail type="volume"><caption>vol.</caption><number>13</number></detail><detail type="issue"><caption>no.</caption><number>3</number></detail><extent unit="pages"><start>215</start><end>223</end><total>9</total></extent></part></relatedItem><identifier type="istex">FBBCB3694511D235E27CF4114620017CDA5D5D7D</identifier><identifier type="ark">ark:/67375/WNG-PX4NTLFD-R</identifier><identifier type="DOI">10.1111/j.1708-8208.2009.00202.x</identifier><identifier type="ArticleID">CID202</identifier><accessCondition type="use and reproduction" contentType="copyright">© 2009 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.</accessCondition><recordInfo><recordContentSource authority="ISTEX" authorityURI="https://loaded-corpus.data.istex.fr" valueURI="https://loaded-corpus.data.istex.fr/ark:/67375/XBH-L0C46X92-X">wiley</recordContentSource><recordOrigin>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</recordOrigin></recordInfo></mods><json:item><extension>json</extension><original>false</original><mimetype>application/json</mimetype><uri>https://api.istex.fr/document/FBBCB3694511D235E27CF4114620017CDA5D5D7D/metadata/json</uri></json:item></metadata><serie></serie></istex></record>Pour manipuler ce document sous Unix (Dilib)
EXPLOR_STEP=$WICRI_ROOT/Wicri/Santé/explor/EdenteV2/Data/Istex/Corpus
HfdSelect -h $EXPLOR_STEP/biblio.hfd -nk 007C53 | SxmlIndent | more
Ou
HfdSelect -h $EXPLOR_AREA/Data/Istex/Corpus/biblio.hfd -nk 007C53 | SxmlIndent | more
Pour mettre un lien sur cette page dans le réseau Wicri
{{Explor lien
|wiki= Wicri/Santé
|area= EdenteV2
|flux= Istex
|étape= Corpus
|type= RBID
|clé= ISTEX:FBBCB3694511D235E27CF4114620017CDA5D5D7D
|texte= The Effects of Superficial Roughness and Design on the Primary Stability of Dental Implants
}}
| This area was generated with Dilib version V0.6.32. |  |