A systematic review of the survival and complication rates of fixed partial dentures (FPDs) after an observation period of at least 5 years
Identifieur interne : 007C41 ( Istex/Corpus ); précédent : 007C40; suivant : 007C42A systematic review of the survival and complication rates of fixed partial dentures (FPDs) after an observation period of at least 5 years
Auteurs : Ken Tan ; Bjarni E. Pjetursson ; Niklaus P. Lang ; Edwin S. Y. ChanSource :
- Clinical Oral Implants Research [ 0905-7161 ] ; 2004-12.
English descriptors
- KwdEn :
- Abutment, Abutment fracture, Abutment teeth, Abutment vitality, Abutment years, Acta odontologica scandinavica, Available data, Bergenholtz, Bergenholtz nyman, Biological complications, Bridge prostheses, Cantilever fpds, Caries, Clin, Clinical evaluation, Cohort, Complication, Complication rate, Complication rates, Control teeth, Dental bridges, Dentistry, Denture, Ericsson, Ericsson marken, Exposure time, Exposure times, Failure rate, Failure rates, Fayyad, Fpd, Fpds exposure time, Fpds table, Fracture, Glantz, Gustavsen, Gustavsen silness, High occurrence, Hochman, Impl, Inclusion criteria, Institutional patients, International journal, Jokstad, Jokstad mjor, Karlsson, Lang, Libby, Lindhe, Longitudinal study, Marken, Material complications, Material fractures, Maximum time, Mjor, Napankangas, Nyman, Nyman lindhe, Observation period, Odman, Oral impl, Oral rehabilitation, Palmqvist, Palmqvist swartz, Partial dentures, Patient cohort, Periodontal, Periodontal disease, Periodontitis, Pjetursson, Present analysis, Present review, Private patients, Prosthesis, Prosthetic, Prosthetic dentistry, Prosthodontics, Pulpal necrosis, Random selection, Recurrent periodontitis, Retainer, Retrospective, Retrospective cohort studies, Search strategy, Selection data, Silness, Singapore, Success rates, Sundh, Sundh odman, Swartz, Systematic review, Technical complications, Technical failures, Total exposure time, Valderhaug, Veneer.
- Teeft :
- Abutment, Abutment fracture, Abutment teeth, Abutment vitality, Abutment years, Acta odontologica scandinavica, Available data, Bergenholtz, Bergenholtz nyman, Biological complications, Bridge prostheses, Cantilever fpds, Caries, Clin, Clinical evaluation, Cohort, Complication, Complication rate, Complication rates, Control teeth, Dental bridges, Dentistry, Denture, Ericsson, Ericsson marken, Exposure time, Exposure times, Failure rate, Failure rates, Fayyad, Fpd, Fpds exposure time, Fpds table, Fracture, Glantz, Gustavsen, Gustavsen silness, High occurrence, Hochman, Impl, Inclusion criteria, Institutional patients, International journal, Jokstad, Jokstad mjor, Karlsson, Lang, Libby, Lindhe, Longitudinal study, Marken, Material complications, Material fractures, Maximum time, Mjor, Napankangas, Nyman, Nyman lindhe, Observation period, Odman, Oral impl, Oral rehabilitation, Palmqvist, Palmqvist swartz, Partial dentures, Patient cohort, Periodontal, Periodontal disease, Periodontitis, Pjetursson, Present analysis, Present review, Private patients, Prosthesis, Prosthetic, Prosthetic dentistry, Prosthodontics, Pulpal necrosis, Random selection, Recurrent periodontitis, Retainer, Retrospective, Retrospective cohort studies, Search strategy, Selection data, Silness, Singapore, Success rates, Sundh, Sundh odman, Swartz, Systematic review, Technical complications, Technical failures, Total exposure time, Valderhaug, Veneer.
Abstract
Abstract: The present study was done to determine the long‐term success and survival of fixed partial dentures (FPDs) and to evaluate the risks for failures due to specific biological and technical complications. A MEDLINE search (PubMed) from 1966 up to March 2004 was conducted, as well as hand searching of bibliographies from relevant articles. Nineteen studies from an initial yield of 3658 titles were finally selected and data were extracted independently by three reviewers. Prospective and retrospective cohort studies with a mean follow‐up time of at least 5 years in which patients had been examined clinically at the follow‐up visits were included in the meta‐analysis. Publications only based on patients records, questionnaires or interviews were excluded. Survival of the FPDs was analyzed according to in situ and intact failure risks. Specific biological and technical complications such as caries, loss of vitality and periodontal disease recurrence as well as loss of retention, loss of vitality, tooth and material fractures were also analyzed. The 10‐year probability of survival for fixed partial dentures was 89.1% (95% confidence interval (CI): 81–93.8%) while the probability of success was 71.1% (95% CI: 47.7–85.2%). The 10‐year risk for caries and periodontitis leading to FPD loss was 2.6% and 0.7%, respectively. The 10‐year risk for loss of retention was 6.4%, for abutment fracture 2.1% and for material fractures 3.2%.
Url:
DOI: 10.1111/j.1600-0501.2004.01119.x
Links to Exploration step
ISTEX:FB7F3B5F4BC0D2A2CAE3C9FB3532B91A288308C4Le document en format XML
<record><TEI wicri:istexFullTextTei="biblStruct"><teiHeader><fileDesc><titleStmt><title xml:lang="en">A systematic review of the survival and complication rates of fixed partial dentures (FPDs) after an observation period of at least 5 years</title><author><name sortKey="Tan, Ken" sort="Tan, Ken" uniqKey="Tan K" first="Ken" last="Tan">Ken Tan</name><affiliation><mods:affiliation>National Dental Center, Singapore, Singapore</mods:affiliation></affiliation></author><author><name sortKey="Pjetursson, Bjarni E" sort="Pjetursson, Bjarni E" uniqKey="Pjetursson B" first="Bjarni E." last="Pjetursson">Bjarni E. Pjetursson</name><affiliation><mods:affiliation>School of Dental Medicine, University of Berne, Berne, Switzerland</mods:affiliation></affiliation></author><author><name sortKey="Lang, Niklaus P" sort="Lang, Niklaus P" uniqKey="Lang N" first="Niklaus P." last="Lang">Niklaus P. Lang</name><affiliation><mods:affiliation>School of Dental Medicine, University of Berne, Berne, Switzerland</mods:affiliation></affiliation></author><author><name sortKey="Chan, Edwin S Y" sort="Chan, Edwin S Y" uniqKey="Chan E" first="Edwin S. Y." last="Chan">Edwin S. Y. Chan</name><affiliation><mods:affiliation>Clinical Trials and Epidemiology Research Unit, Singapore, Singapore</mods:affiliation></affiliation></author></titleStmt><publicationStmt><idno type="wicri:source">ISTEX</idno><idno type="RBID">ISTEX:FB7F3B5F4BC0D2A2CAE3C9FB3532B91A288308C4</idno><date when="2004" year="2004">2004</date><idno type="doi">10.1111/j.1600-0501.2004.01119.x</idno><idno type="url">https://api.istex.fr/document/FB7F3B5F4BC0D2A2CAE3C9FB3532B91A288308C4/fulltext/pdf</idno><idno type="wicri:Area/Istex/Corpus">007C41</idno><idno type="wicri:explorRef" wicri:stream="Istex" wicri:step="Corpus" wicri:corpus="ISTEX">007C41</idno></publicationStmt><sourceDesc><biblStruct><analytic><title level="a" type="main" xml:lang="en">A systematic review of the survival and complication rates of fixed partial dentures (FPDs) after an observation period of at least 5 years</title><author><name sortKey="Tan, Ken" sort="Tan, Ken" uniqKey="Tan K" first="Ken" last="Tan">Ken Tan</name><affiliation><mods:affiliation>National Dental Center, Singapore, Singapore</mods:affiliation></affiliation></author><author><name sortKey="Pjetursson, Bjarni E" sort="Pjetursson, Bjarni E" uniqKey="Pjetursson B" first="Bjarni E." last="Pjetursson">Bjarni E. Pjetursson</name><affiliation><mods:affiliation>School of Dental Medicine, University of Berne, Berne, Switzerland</mods:affiliation></affiliation></author><author><name sortKey="Lang, Niklaus P" sort="Lang, Niklaus P" uniqKey="Lang N" first="Niklaus P." last="Lang">Niklaus P. Lang</name><affiliation><mods:affiliation>School of Dental Medicine, University of Berne, Berne, Switzerland</mods:affiliation></affiliation></author><author><name sortKey="Chan, Edwin S Y" sort="Chan, Edwin S Y" uniqKey="Chan E" first="Edwin S. Y." last="Chan">Edwin S. Y. Chan</name><affiliation><mods:affiliation>Clinical Trials and Epidemiology Research Unit, Singapore, Singapore</mods:affiliation></affiliation></author></analytic><monogr></monogr><series><title level="j" type="main">Clinical Oral Implants Research</title><title level="j" type="alt">CLINICAL ORAL IMPLANTS RESEARCH</title><idno type="ISSN">0905-7161</idno><idno type="eISSN">1600-0501</idno><imprint><biblScope unit="vol">15</biblScope><biblScope unit="issue">6</biblScope><biblScope unit="page" from="654">654</biblScope><biblScope unit="page" to="666">666</biblScope><biblScope unit="page-count">13</biblScope><publisher>Munksgaard International Publishers</publisher><pubPlace>Oxford, UK</pubPlace><date type="published" when="2004-12">2004-12</date></imprint><idno type="ISSN">0905-7161</idno></series></biblStruct></sourceDesc><seriesStmt><idno type="ISSN">0905-7161</idno></seriesStmt></fileDesc><profileDesc><textClass><keywords scheme="KwdEn" xml:lang="en"><term>Abutment</term><term>Abutment fracture</term><term>Abutment teeth</term><term>Abutment vitality</term><term>Abutment years</term><term>Acta odontologica scandinavica</term><term>Available data</term><term>Bergenholtz</term><term>Bergenholtz nyman</term><term>Biological complications</term><term>Bridge prostheses</term><term>Cantilever fpds</term><term>Caries</term><term>Clin</term><term>Clinical evaluation</term><term>Cohort</term><term>Complication</term><term>Complication rate</term><term>Complication rates</term><term>Control teeth</term><term>Dental bridges</term><term>Dentistry</term><term>Denture</term><term>Ericsson</term><term>Ericsson marken</term><term>Exposure time</term><term>Exposure times</term><term>Failure rate</term><term>Failure rates</term><term>Fayyad</term><term>Fpd</term><term>Fpds exposure time</term><term>Fpds table</term><term>Fracture</term><term>Glantz</term><term>Gustavsen</term><term>Gustavsen silness</term><term>High occurrence</term><term>Hochman</term><term>Impl</term><term>Inclusion criteria</term><term>Institutional patients</term><term>International journal</term><term>Jokstad</term><term>Jokstad mjor</term><term>Karlsson</term><term>Lang</term><term>Libby</term><term>Lindhe</term><term>Longitudinal study</term><term>Marken</term><term>Material complications</term><term>Material fractures</term><term>Maximum time</term><term>Mjor</term><term>Napankangas</term><term>Nyman</term><term>Nyman lindhe</term><term>Observation period</term><term>Odman</term><term>Oral impl</term><term>Oral rehabilitation</term><term>Palmqvist</term><term>Palmqvist swartz</term><term>Partial dentures</term><term>Patient cohort</term><term>Periodontal</term><term>Periodontal disease</term><term>Periodontitis</term><term>Pjetursson</term><term>Present analysis</term><term>Present review</term><term>Private patients</term><term>Prosthesis</term><term>Prosthetic</term><term>Prosthetic dentistry</term><term>Prosthodontics</term><term>Pulpal necrosis</term><term>Random selection</term><term>Recurrent periodontitis</term><term>Retainer</term><term>Retrospective</term><term>Retrospective cohort studies</term><term>Search strategy</term><term>Selection data</term><term>Silness</term><term>Singapore</term><term>Success rates</term><term>Sundh</term><term>Sundh odman</term><term>Swartz</term><term>Systematic review</term><term>Technical complications</term><term>Technical failures</term><term>Total exposure time</term><term>Valderhaug</term><term>Veneer</term></keywords><keywords scheme="Teeft" xml:lang="en"><term>Abutment</term><term>Abutment fracture</term><term>Abutment teeth</term><term>Abutment vitality</term><term>Abutment years</term><term>Acta odontologica scandinavica</term><term>Available data</term><term>Bergenholtz</term><term>Bergenholtz nyman</term><term>Biological complications</term><term>Bridge prostheses</term><term>Cantilever fpds</term><term>Caries</term><term>Clin</term><term>Clinical evaluation</term><term>Cohort</term><term>Complication</term><term>Complication rate</term><term>Complication rates</term><term>Control teeth</term><term>Dental bridges</term><term>Dentistry</term><term>Denture</term><term>Ericsson</term><term>Ericsson marken</term><term>Exposure time</term><term>Exposure times</term><term>Failure rate</term><term>Failure rates</term><term>Fayyad</term><term>Fpd</term><term>Fpds exposure time</term><term>Fpds table</term><term>Fracture</term><term>Glantz</term><term>Gustavsen</term><term>Gustavsen silness</term><term>High occurrence</term><term>Hochman</term><term>Impl</term><term>Inclusion criteria</term><term>Institutional patients</term><term>International journal</term><term>Jokstad</term><term>Jokstad mjor</term><term>Karlsson</term><term>Lang</term><term>Libby</term><term>Lindhe</term><term>Longitudinal study</term><term>Marken</term><term>Material complications</term><term>Material fractures</term><term>Maximum time</term><term>Mjor</term><term>Napankangas</term><term>Nyman</term><term>Nyman lindhe</term><term>Observation period</term><term>Odman</term><term>Oral impl</term><term>Oral rehabilitation</term><term>Palmqvist</term><term>Palmqvist swartz</term><term>Partial dentures</term><term>Patient cohort</term><term>Periodontal</term><term>Periodontal disease</term><term>Periodontitis</term><term>Pjetursson</term><term>Present analysis</term><term>Present review</term><term>Private patients</term><term>Prosthesis</term><term>Prosthetic</term><term>Prosthetic dentistry</term><term>Prosthodontics</term><term>Pulpal necrosis</term><term>Random selection</term><term>Recurrent periodontitis</term><term>Retainer</term><term>Retrospective</term><term>Retrospective cohort studies</term><term>Search strategy</term><term>Selection data</term><term>Silness</term><term>Singapore</term><term>Success rates</term><term>Sundh</term><term>Sundh odman</term><term>Swartz</term><term>Systematic review</term><term>Technical complications</term><term>Technical failures</term><term>Total exposure time</term><term>Valderhaug</term><term>Veneer</term></keywords></textClass></profileDesc></teiHeader><front><div type="abstract">Abstract: The present study was done to determine the long‐term success and survival of fixed partial dentures (FPDs) and to evaluate the risks for failures due to specific biological and technical complications. A MEDLINE search (PubMed) from 1966 up to March 2004 was conducted, as well as hand searching of bibliographies from relevant articles. Nineteen studies from an initial yield of 3658 titles were finally selected and data were extracted independently by three reviewers. Prospective and retrospective cohort studies with a mean follow‐up time of at least 5 years in which patients had been examined clinically at the follow‐up visits were included in the meta‐analysis. Publications only based on patients records, questionnaires or interviews were excluded. Survival of the FPDs was analyzed according to in situ and intact failure risks. Specific biological and technical complications such as caries, loss of vitality and periodontal disease recurrence as well as loss of retention, loss of vitality, tooth and material fractures were also analyzed. The 10‐year probability of survival for fixed partial dentures was 89.1% (95% confidence interval (CI): 81–93.8%) while the probability of success was 71.1% (95% CI: 47.7–85.2%). The 10‐year risk for caries and periodontitis leading to FPD loss was 2.6% and 0.7%, respectively. The 10‐year risk for loss of retention was 6.4%, for abutment fracture 2.1% and for material fractures 3.2%.</div></front></TEI><istex><corpusName>wiley</corpusName><keywords><teeft><json:string>fpd</json:string><json:string>abutment</json:string><json:string>caries</json:string><json:string>denture</json:string><json:string>partial dentures</json:string><json:string>karlsson</json:string><json:string>nyman</json:string><json:string>hochman</json:string><json:string>fracture</json:string><json:string>odman</json:string><json:string>periodontal</json:string><json:string>palmqvist</json:string><json:string>systematic review</json:string><json:string>valderhaug</json:string><json:string>cohort</json:string><json:string>sundh</json:string><json:string>napankangas</json:string><json:string>periodontitis</json:string><json:string>palmqvist swartz</json:string><json:string>oral rehabilitation</json:string><json:string>libby</json:string><json:string>fayyad</json:string><json:string>sundh odman</json:string><json:string>gustavsen</json:string><json:string>clin</json:string><json:string>ericsson</json:string><json:string>impl</json:string><json:string>technical complications</json:string><json:string>oral impl</json:string><json:string>silness</json:string><json:string>prosthodontics</json:string><json:string>jokstad</json:string><json:string>gustavsen silness</json:string><json:string>lang</json:string><json:string>mjor</json:string><json:string>lindhe</json:string><json:string>bergenholtz</json:string><json:string>abutment teeth</json:string><json:string>complication rates</json:string><json:string>nyman lindhe</json:string><json:string>marken</json:string><json:string>glantz</json:string><json:string>bergenholtz nyman</json:string><json:string>failure rate</json:string><json:string>complication rate</json:string><json:string>prosthesis</json:string><json:string>complication</json:string><json:string>swartz</json:string><json:string>pjetursson</json:string><json:string>abutment fracture</json:string><json:string>abutment vitality</json:string><json:string>jokstad mjor</json:string><json:string>material complications</json:string><json:string>observation period</json:string><json:string>retainer</json:string><json:string>failure rates</json:string><json:string>ericsson marken</json:string><json:string>prosthetic</json:string><json:string>singapore</json:string><json:string>institutional patients</json:string><json:string>periodontal disease</json:string><json:string>international journal</json:string><json:string>prosthetic dentistry</json:string><json:string>acta odontologica scandinavica</json:string><json:string>recurrent periodontitis</json:string><json:string>exposure times</json:string><json:string>dentistry</json:string><json:string>retrospective</json:string><json:string>private patients</json:string><json:string>total exposure time</json:string><json:string>present review</json:string><json:string>material fractures</json:string><json:string>exposure time</json:string><json:string>clinical evaluation</json:string><json:string>longitudinal study</json:string><json:string>veneer</json:string><json:string>control teeth</json:string><json:string>technical failures</json:string><json:string>fpds exposure time</json:string><json:string>fpds table</json:string><json:string>success rates</json:string><json:string>present analysis</json:string><json:string>available data</json:string><json:string>high occurrence</json:string><json:string>biological complications</json:string><json:string>pulpal necrosis</json:string><json:string>abutment years</json:string><json:string>random selection</json:string><json:string>selection data</json:string><json:string>patient cohort</json:string><json:string>search strategy</json:string><json:string>dental bridges</json:string><json:string>inclusion criteria</json:string><json:string>cantilever fpds</json:string><json:string>retrospective cohort studies</json:string><json:string>bridge prostheses</json:string><json:string>maximum time</json:string></teeft></keywords><author><json:item><name>Ken Tan</name><affiliations><json:string>National Dental Center, Singapore, Singapore</json:string></affiliations></json:item><json:item><name>Bjarni E. Pjetursson</name><affiliations><json:string>School of Dental Medicine, University of Berne, Berne, Switzerland</json:string></affiliations></json:item><json:item><name>Niklaus P. Lang</name><affiliations><json:string>School of Dental Medicine, University of Berne, Berne, Switzerland</json:string></affiliations></json:item><json:item><name>Edwin S.Y. Chan</name><affiliations><json:string>Clinical Trials and Epidemiology Research Unit, Singapore, Singapore</json:string></affiliations></json:item></author><subject><json:item><lang><json:string>eng</json:string></lang><value>abutment fractures</value></json:item><json:item><lang><json:string>eng</json:string></lang><value>biological</value></json:item><json:item><lang><json:string>eng</json:string></lang><value>caries</value></json:item><json:item><lang><json:string>eng</json:string></lang><value>fixed partial dentures</value></json:item><json:item><lang><json:string>eng</json:string></lang><value>loss of retention</value></json:item><json:item><lang><json:string>eng</json:string></lang><value>loss of vitality</value></json:item><json:item><lang><json:string>eng</json:string></lang><value>material fractures</value></json:item><json:item><lang><json:string>eng</json:string></lang><value>periodontitis</value></json:item><json:item><lang><json:string>eng</json:string></lang><value>success</value></json:item><json:item><lang><json:string>eng</json:string></lang><value>survival</value></json:item><json:item><lang><json:string>eng</json:string></lang><value>systematic review</value></json:item><json:item><lang><json:string>eng</json:string></lang><value>technical complications</value></json:item></subject><articleId><json:string>CLR1119</json:string></articleId><arkIstex>ark:/67375/WNG-1RW1RCWD-S</arkIstex><language><json:string>eng</json:string></language><originalGenre><json:string>article</json:string></originalGenre><abstract>Abstract: The present study was done to determine the long‐term success and survival of fixed partial dentures (FPDs) and to evaluate the risks for failures due to specific biological and technical complications. A MEDLINE search (PubMed) from 1966 up to March 2004 was conducted, as well as hand searching of bibliographies from relevant articles. Nineteen studies from an initial yield of 3658 titles were finally selected and data were extracted independently by three reviewers. Prospective and retrospective cohort studies with a mean follow‐up time of at least 5 years in which patients had been examined clinically at the follow‐up visits were included in the meta‐analysis. Publications only based on patients records, questionnaires or interviews were excluded. Survival of the FPDs was analyzed according to in situ and intact failure risks. Specific biological and technical complications such as caries, loss of vitality and periodontal disease recurrence as well as loss of retention, loss of vitality, tooth and material fractures were also analyzed. The 10‐year probability of survival for fixed partial dentures was 89.1% (95% confidence interval (CI): 81–93.8%) while the probability of success was 71.1% (95% CI: 47.7–85.2%). The 10‐year risk for caries and periodontitis leading to FPD loss was 2.6% and 0.7%, respectively. The 10‐year risk for loss of retention was 6.4%, for abutment fracture 2.1% and for material fractures 3.2%.</abstract><qualityIndicators><score>9.652</score><pdfWordCount>8041</pdfWordCount><pdfCharCount>54900</pdfCharCount><pdfVersion>1.3</pdfVersion><pdfPageCount>13</pdfPageCount><pdfPageSize>595 x 782 pts</pdfPageSize><refBibsNative>true</refBibsNative><abstractWordCount>221</abstractWordCount><abstractCharCount>1451</abstractCharCount><keywordCount>12</keywordCount></qualityIndicators><title>A systematic review of the survival and complication rates of fixed partial dentures (FPDs) after an observation period of at least 5 years</title><pmid><json:string>15533126</json:string></pmid><genre><json:string>article</json:string></genre><host><title>Clinical Oral Implants Research</title><language><json:string>unknown</json:string></language><doi><json:string>10.1111/(ISSN)1600-0501</json:string></doi><issn><json:string>0905-7161</json:string></issn><eissn><json:string>1600-0501</json:string></eissn><publisherId><json:string>CLR</json:string></publisherId><volume>15</volume><issue>6</issue><pages><first>654</first><last>666</last><total>13</total></pages><genre><json:string>journal</json:string></genre></host><namedEntities><unitex><date><json:string>1990s</json:string><json:string>1080</json:string><json:string>1207</json:string><json:string>1994</json:string><json:string>2881</json:string><json:string>1966</json:string><json:string>1307</json:string><json:string>1984</json:string><json:string>3548</json:string><json:string>1980s</json:string><json:string>3658</json:string><json:string>2004</json:string><json:string>1996</json:string></date><geogName></geogName><orgName><json:string>Department of Restorative Dentistry National Dental Center Singapore</json:string><json:string>Switzerland Edwin S</json:string><json:string>University of Berne</json:string><json:string>Singapore Tel</json:string><json:string>Epidemiology Research Unit, Singapore, Singapore Correspondence</json:string><json:string>Hospital Avenue Singapore</json:string></orgName><orgName_funder></orgName_funder><orgName_provider></orgName_provider><persName><json:string>Studies</json:string><json:string>Ken</json:string><json:string>Systematic</json:string><json:string>Y. Chan</json:string><json:string>Dental</json:string><json:string>Institutional</json:string><json:string>Caries</json:string><json:string>Present</json:string></persName><placeName><json:string>Jokstad</json:string></placeName><ref_url></ref_url><ref_bibl><json:string>Maryniuk & Kaplan 1986</json:string><json:string>Hochman et al. (1992)</json:string><json:string>Ericsson & Marken 1968</json:string><json:string>Nyman & Lindhe 1979</json:string><json:string>Valderhaug et al. 1997</json:string><json:string>Fayyad & al-Rafee 1996a, 1996b</json:string><json:string>Yi et al. (1996)</json:string><json:string>Randow et al. 1986</json:string><json:string>Karlsson 1986</json:string><json:string>Napankangas et al. 2002</json:string><json:string>Langeland & Langeland 1968</json:string><json:string>Gustavsen & Silness 1986</json:string><json:string>Hume & Massey 1990</json:string><json:string>1970a, 1970b</json:string><json:string>Odman & Karlsson 1988</json:string><json:string>Owall et al. 1992</json:string><json:string>Karlsson (1986)</json:string><json:string>Roberts 1970a, 1970b</json:string><json:string>1996a, 1996b</json:string><json:string>Libby et al. 1997</json:string><json:string>Foster 1990a, 1990b</json:string><json:string>Izikowitz 1985</json:string><json:string>Palmqvist & Swartz 1993</json:string><json:string>Napankangas et al. (2002)</json:string><json:string>Jokstad & Mjor 1996</json:string><json:string>Creugers et al. (1994)</json:string><json:string>Walton 2003</json:string><json:string>Hochman et al. 1992</json:string><json:string>Pjetursson et al. 2004a, 2004b</json:string><json:string>Aquilino et al. 2001</json:string><json:string>Hochman et al. (2003)</json:string><json:string>Scurria et al. (1998)</json:string><json:string>Glantz et al. 2002</json:string><json:string>Glantz et al. (2002)</json:string><json:string>Leempoel et al. 1985</json:string><json:string>Cheung et al. 1990</json:string><json:string>Tan et al</json:string><json:string>Walton 2002</json:string><json:string>Scurria et al. 1998</json:string><json:string>Yi et al. 1996</json:string><json:string>Kelsey et al. 1996</json:string><json:string>Reuter & Brose 1984</json:string><json:string>Rene et al. 1991</json:string><json:string>Nyman & Lindhe 1979; Bergenholtz & Nyman 1984; Fayyad & al-Rafee 1996a, 1996b</json:string><json:string>Djemal et al. 1999</json:string><json:string>Bergenholtz & Nyman 1984</json:string><json:string>Leempoel et al. 1995</json:string><json:string>Libby et al. (1997)</json:string><json:string>Nyman & Ericsson 1982</json:string><json:string>Glantz et al. 1993</json:string><json:string>Swartz et al. 1996</json:string><json:string>Sundh & Odman 1997</json:string><json:string>Creugers et al. 1994</json:string><json:string>Schwartz et al. 1970</json:string><json:string>Shugars et al. 1998</json:string><json:string>Hochman et al. 2003</json:string><json:string>Reichen-Graden & Lang 1989</json:string></ref_bibl><bibl></bibl></unitex></namedEntities><ark><json:string>ark:/67375/WNG-1RW1RCWD-S</json:string></ark><categories><wos><json:string>1 - science</json:string><json:string>2 - engineering, biomedical</json:string><json:string>2 - dentistry, oral surgery & medicine</json:string></wos><scienceMetrix><json:string>1 - health sciences</json:string><json:string>2 - clinical medicine</json:string><json:string>3 - dentistry</json:string></scienceMetrix><scopus><json:string>1 - Health Sciences</json:string><json:string>2 - Dentistry</json:string><json:string>3 - Oral Surgery</json:string></scopus></categories><publicationDate>2004</publicationDate><copyrightDate>2004</copyrightDate><doi><json:string>10.1111/j.1600-0501.2004.01119.x</json:string></doi><id>FB7F3B5F4BC0D2A2CAE3C9FB3532B91A288308C4</id><score>1</score><fulltext><json:item><extension>pdf</extension><original>true</original><mimetype>application/pdf</mimetype><uri>https://api.istex.fr/document/FB7F3B5F4BC0D2A2CAE3C9FB3532B91A288308C4/fulltext/pdf</uri></json:item><json:item><extension>zip</extension><original>false</original><mimetype>application/zip</mimetype><uri>https://api.istex.fr/document/FB7F3B5F4BC0D2A2CAE3C9FB3532B91A288308C4/fulltext/zip</uri></json:item><istex:fulltextTEI uri="https://api.istex.fr/document/FB7F3B5F4BC0D2A2CAE3C9FB3532B91A288308C4/fulltext/tei"><teiHeader><fileDesc><titleStmt><title level="a" type="main" xml:lang="en">A systematic review of the survival and complication rates of fixed partial dentures (FPDs) after an observation period of at least 5 years</title><title level="a" type="main" xml:lang="de">Eine systematische Uebersicht der Ueberlebens‐ und Komplikationsraten bei festsitzenden Brückenrekonstruktionen (FPDs) über eine Beobachtungszeit von mindestens 5 Jahren III. Konventionelle FPDs</title></titleStmt><publicationStmt><authority>ISTEX</authority><publisher>Munksgaard International Publishers</publisher><pubPlace>Oxford, UK</pubPlace><date type="published" when="2004-12"></date></publicationStmt><notesStmt><note type="content-type" subtype="article" source="article" scheme="https://content-type.data.istex.fr/ark:/67375/XTP-6N5SZHKN-D">article</note><note type="publication-type" subtype="journal" scheme="https://publication-type.data.istex.fr/ark:/67375/JMC-0GLKJH51-B">journal</note></notesStmt><sourceDesc><biblStruct type="article"><analytic><title level="a" type="main" xml:lang="en">A systematic review of the survival and complication rates of fixed partial dentures (FPDs) after an observation period of at least 5 years</title><title level="a" type="main" xml:lang="de">Eine systematische Uebersicht der Ueberlebens‐ und Komplikationsraten bei festsitzenden Brückenrekonstruktionen (FPDs) über eine Beobachtungszeit von mindestens 5 Jahren III. Konventionelle FPDs</title><title level="a" type="sub" xml:lang="en">III. Conventional FPDs</title><title level="a" type="short" xml:lang="en">Systematic review of FPDs</title><author xml:id="author-0000"><persName><forename type="first">Ken</forename><surname>Tan</surname></persName><affiliation>National Dental Center, Singapore, Singapore<address><country key="SG"></country></address></affiliation></author><author xml:id="author-0001"><persName><forename type="first">Bjarni E.</forename><surname>Pjetursson</surname></persName><affiliation>School of Dental Medicine, University of Berne, Berne, Switzerland<address><country key="CH"></country></address></affiliation></author><author xml:id="author-0002"><persName><forename type="first">Niklaus P.</forename><surname>Lang</surname></persName><affiliation>School of Dental Medicine, University of Berne, Berne, Switzerland<address><country key="CH"></country></address></affiliation></author><author xml:id="author-0003"><persName><forename type="first">Edwin S.Y.</forename><surname>Chan</surname></persName><affiliation>Clinical Trials and Epidemiology Research Unit, Singapore, Singapore<address><country key="SG"></country></address></affiliation></author><idno type="istex">FB7F3B5F4BC0D2A2CAE3C9FB3532B91A288308C4</idno><idno type="ark">ark:/67375/WNG-1RW1RCWD-S</idno><idno type="DOI">10.1111/j.1600-0501.2004.01119.x</idno><idno type="unit">CLR1119</idno><idno type="supplier">1119</idno><idno type="toTypesetVersion">file:CLR.CLR1119.pdf</idno></analytic><monogr><title level="j" type="main">Clinical Oral Implants Research</title><title level="j" type="alt">CLINICAL ORAL IMPLANTS RESEARCH</title><idno type="pISSN">0905-7161</idno><idno type="eISSN">1600-0501</idno><idno type="book-DOI">10.1111/(ISSN)1600-0501</idno><idno type="book-part-DOI">10.1111/clr.2004.15.issue-6</idno><idno type="product">CLR</idno><idno type="publisherDivision">ST</idno><imprint><biblScope unit="vol">15</biblScope><biblScope unit="issue">6</biblScope><biblScope unit="page" from="654">654</biblScope><biblScope unit="page" to="666">666</biblScope><biblScope unit="page-count">13</biblScope><publisher>Munksgaard International Publishers</publisher><pubPlace>Oxford, UK</pubPlace><date type="published" when="2004-12"></date></imprint></monogr></biblStruct></sourceDesc></fileDesc><profileDesc><abstract xml:lang="en" style="main"><p><hi rend="bold">Abstract: </hi> The present study was done to determine the long‐term success and survival of fixed partial dentures (FPDs) and to evaluate the risks for failures due to specific biological and technical complications. A MEDLINE search (PubMed) from 1966 up to March 2004 was conducted, as well as hand searching of bibliographies from relevant articles. Nineteen studies from an initial yield of 3658 titles were finally selected and data were extracted independently by three reviewers. Prospective and retrospective cohort studies with a mean follow‐up time of at least 5 years in which patients had been examined clinically at the follow‐up visits were included in the meta‐analysis. Publications only based on patients records, questionnaires or interviews were excluded. Survival of the FPDs was analyzed according to <hi rend="italic">in situ</hi> and intact failure risks. Specific biological and technical complications such as caries, loss of vitality and periodontal disease recurrence as well as loss of retention, loss of vitality, tooth and material fractures were also analyzed. The 10‐year probability of survival for fixed partial dentures was 89.1% (95% confidence interval (CI): 81–93.8%) while the probability of success was 71.1% (95% CI: 47.7–85.2%). The 10‐year risk for caries and periodontitis leading to FPD loss was 2.6% and 0.7%, respectively. The 10‐year risk for loss of retention was 6.4%, for abutment fracture 2.1% and for material fractures 3.2%.</p></abstract><abstract xml:lang="fr" style="main"><head>Résumé</head><p>L'étude présente a été effectuée pour déterminer le succès à long terme et la survie des prothèses fixées et d'évaluer les risques d'échecs dûà des complications biologiques et techniques. Une recherche Medline de 1966 à mars 2004 a été effectuée ainsi que manuelle pour les bibliographies des articles pouvant répondre à cette question. Dix‐neuf études ont été tirées à partir de 3 658 titres et les données ont été extraites indépendamment par deux personnes. Les études prospectives et rétrospectives avec un temps de suivi de minimum cinq années dans lesquelles les patients avaient été examinés cliniquement lors du suivi ont été incluses dans cette méta‐analyse. Les publications uniquement basées sur les dossiers des patients, les questionnaires et les interviews ont été exclues. La survie des prothèses a été analysée suivant les risques d'échec et de succès <hi rend="italic">in situ</hi>. Des complications techniques et biologiques spécifiques telle que les caries, la perte de vitalité et la réapparition de la maladie parodontale ainsi que la perte de rétention, la perte de vitalité, les fractures dentaires et de matériaux ont également été analysées. La survie à 10 ans pour les prothèses fixées était de 89,1% (intervalle de confiance de 95% : 81,0 à 93,8%) tandis que le succès était de 71,1% (52,2 à 83,6%). Le risque à dix ans pour des caries ou de la parodontite entraînant la perte de la prothèse était respectivement de 2,6 et 0,7%. Le risque à dix années pour la perte de rétention était de 6,4%, de fracture du pilier de 2,1% et de fracture de matériaux de 3,2%.</p></abstract><abstract xml:lang="de" style="main"><head>Zusammenfassung</head><p>Die vorliegende Studie wurde unternommen, um die Langzeiterfolgs‐ und Ueberlebensraten von festsitzenden Brückenrekonstruktionen (FPDs) zu bestimmen und die Risiken für Misserfolge aufgrund spezifischer biologischer und technischer Komplikationen auszuwerten.</p><p>Es wurde eine Medline Suche (PubMed) über einen Zeitraum von 1966 bis März 2004 durchgeführt und die Bibliographien von relevanten Artikeln wurden manuell durchsucht. Von einer anfänglichen Auswahl von 3658 Artikeln wurden schlussendlich 19 ausgewählt und die Daten wurden von drei Rezensenten unabhängig herausgelesen. Es wurden prospektive und retrospektive Kohorten‐Studien mit einer mittleren Beobachtungszeit von mindestens 5 Jahren, in welchen Patienten klinisch nachuntersucht worden waren, in die Meta‐Analyse einbezogen. Publikationen, welche nur auf Einträgen in Krankengeschichten, Fragebogen oder Interviews basierten, wurden ausgeschlossen. Das Ueberleben der FPDs wurde entsprechend des <hi rend="italic">in situ</hi> und intakten Misserfolgsrisikos analysiert. Spezifische biologische und technische Komplikationen wie Karies, Vitalitätsverlust und das Auftreten von Parodontalproblemen sowie Retentionsverlust, Zahn‐ und Materialfrakturen wurden ebenfalls analysiert.</p><p>Die Ueberlebensrate von festsitzenden Brückenrekonstruktionen über 10 Jahre betrug 89.1% (95% Vertrauensintervall (CI): 81–93.8%), während die Erfolgsrate 71.1% betrug (95% CI: 52.2–83.6%). Das 10‐Jahres Risiko für Karies und Parodontitis, welche zum Verlust der FPD führen, betrug 2.6% bzw. 0.7%. Das 10‐Jahres Risiko für Retentionsverlust betrug 6.4%, für die Pfeilerfrakturen 2.1% und für Materialfrakturen 3.2%.</p></abstract><abstract xml:lang="es" style="main"><head>Resumen</head><p>El presente estudio se llevó a cabo para determinar el éxito y supervivencia a largo plazo de dentaduras fijas parciales (FPDs) y evaluar los riesgos de fracasos debido a complicaciones biológicas y técnicas específicas.</p><p>Se llevó a cabo una búsqueda por Medline (PubMed) desde 1996 hasta Marzo de 2004 al igual que una búsqueda a mano de bibliografías de artículos relevantes. Finalmente se seleccionaron diecinueve artículos de una cantidad inicial de 3,658 títulos y se extrajeron los datos independientemente por tres revisores. Se incluyeron en este meta‐análisis estudios cohorte prospectivos y retrospectivos con un tiempo de seguimiento medio de 5 años en los que los pacientes se examinaron clínicamente en las visitas de mantenimiento. Se excluyeron publicaciones basadas solamente en las fichas de los pacientes, cuestionarios o entrevistas. Se analizó la supervivencia de los FPDs de acuerdo con los riesgos de fracaso <hi rend="italic">in situ</hi> e intacto. También se analizaron las complicaciones biológicas específicas tales como caries, pérdida de vitalidad y recurrencia de enfermedad periodontal al igual que la pérdida de retención, pérdida de vitalidad, fracturas dentales y del material.</p><p>La supervivencia a los diez años para las dentaduras parciales fijas fue del 89.1% (95% intervalo de confianza (CI): 81–93.8%) mientras que el éxito fue del 71.1% (95% CI: 52.2–83.6%). El riesgo de caries a los 10 años y periodontitis que condujo a la pérdida del FPD fue del 2.6% y del 0.7% respectivamente. El riesgo de pérdida de retención a los 10 años fue del 6.4%, para la fractura del pilar del 2.1% y para la fractura del material del 3.2%.</p><p>
<graphic url="image_n/CLR_1119_fu1.gif" rend="inline image"></graphic>
</p></abstract><textClass><keywords xml:lang="en"><term xml:id="k1">abutment fractures</term><term xml:id="k2">biological</term><term xml:id="k3">caries</term><term xml:id="k4">fixed partial dentures</term><term xml:id="k5">loss of retention</term><term xml:id="k6">loss of vitality</term><term xml:id="k7">material fractures</term><term xml:id="k8">periodontitis</term><term xml:id="k9">success</term><term xml:id="k10">survival</term><term xml:id="k11">systematic review</term><term xml:id="k12">technical complications</term></keywords><keywords rend="tocHeading1"><term>Original articles</term></keywords></textClass><langUsage><language ident="en"></language></langUsage></profileDesc></teiHeader></istex:fulltextTEI><json:item><extension>txt</extension><original>false</original><mimetype>text/plain</mimetype><uri>https://api.istex.fr/document/FB7F3B5F4BC0D2A2CAE3C9FB3532B91A288308C4/fulltext/txt</uri></json:item></fulltext><metadata><istex:metadataXml wicri:clean="Wiley, elements deleted: body"><istex:xmlDeclaration>version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" standalone="yes"</istex:xmlDeclaration><istex:document><component version="2.0" type="serialArticle" xml:lang="en"><header><publicationMeta level="product"><publisherInfo><publisherName>Munksgaard International Publishers</publisherName><publisherLoc>Oxford, UK</publisherLoc></publisherInfo><doi origin="wiley" registered="yes">10.1111/(ISSN)1600-0501</doi><issn type="print">0905-7161</issn><issn type="electronic">1600-0501</issn><idGroup><id type="product" value="CLR"></id><id type="publisherDivision" value="ST"></id></idGroup><titleGroup><title type="main" sort="CLINICAL ORAL IMPLANTS RESEARCH">Clinical Oral Implants Research</title></titleGroup></publicationMeta><publicationMeta level="part" position="12006"><doi origin="wiley">10.1111/clr.2004.15.issue-6</doi><numberingGroup><numbering type="journalVolume" number="15">15</numbering><numbering type="journalIssue" number="6">6</numbering></numberingGroup><coverDate startDate="2004-12">December 2004</coverDate></publicationMeta><publicationMeta level="unit" type="article" position="3" status="forIssue"><doi origin="wiley">10.1111/j.1600-0501.2004.01119.x</doi><idGroup><id type="unit" value="CLR1119"></id><id type="supplier" value="1119"></id></idGroup><countGroup><count type="pageTotal" number="13"></count></countGroup><titleGroup><title type="tocHeading1">Original articles</title></titleGroup><eventGroup><event type="firstOnline" date="2004-10-12"></event><event type="publishedOnlineFinalForm" date="2004-10-12"></event><event type="xmlConverted" agent="Converter:BPG_TO_WML3G version:2.3.2 mode:FullText source:FullText result:FullText" date="2010-03-15"></event><event type="xmlConverted" agent="Converter:WML3G_To_WML3G version:3.9.2 mode:FullText,remove_FC" date="2013-12-10"></event><event type="xmlConverted" agent="Converter:WILEY_ML3G_TO_WILEY_ML3GV2 version:4.0.5" date="2014-05-19"></event><event type="xmlConverted" agent="Converter:WML3G_To_WML3G version:4.1.7 mode:FullText,remove_FC" date="2014-10-16"></event></eventGroup><numberingGroup><numbering type="pageFirst" number="654">654</numbering><numbering type="pageLast" number="666">666</numbering></numberingGroup><correspondenceTo><b>Correspondence to:</b>
<i>Dr Ken Tan</i>,
Department of Restorative Dentistry
National Dental Center Singapore
5 Second Hospital Avenue
Singapore 168938
Singapore
Tel.: (65)‐63248947
Fax: (65)‐63248900
e‐mail: <email normalForm="tken@pacific.net.sg">tken@pacific.net.sg</email></correspondenceTo><linkGroup><link type="toTypesetVersion" href="file:CLR.CLR1119.pdf"></link></linkGroup></publicationMeta><contentMeta><unparsedEditorialHistory><b>Date:</b> Accepted 30 June 2004</unparsedEditorialHistory><countGroup><count type="figureTotal" number="3"></count><count type="tableTotal" number="11"></count><count type="formulaTotal" number="0"></count><count type="referenceTotal" number="52"></count><count type="wordTotal" number="12732"></count><count type="linksCrossRef" number="204"></count></countGroup><titleGroup><title type="main" xml:lang="en">A systematic review of the survival and complication rates of fixed partial dentures (FPDs) after an observation period of at least 5 years</title><title type="subtitle" xml:lang="en">III. Conventional FPDs</title><title type="shortAuthors">Tan et al.</title><title type="short" xml:lang="en">Systematic review of FPDs</title><title type="main" xml:lang="de">Eine systematische Uebersicht der Ueberlebens‐ und Komplikationsraten bei festsitzenden Brückenrekonstruktionen (FPDs) über eine Beobachtungszeit von mindestens 5 Jahren III. Konventionelle FPDs</title></titleGroup><creators><creator creatorRole="author" xml:id="cr1" affiliationRef="#a1"><personName><givenNames>Ken</givenNames><familyName>Tan</familyName></personName></creator><creator creatorRole="author" xml:id="cr2" affiliationRef="#a2"><personName><givenNames>Bjarni E.</givenNames><familyName>Pjetursson</familyName></personName></creator><creator creatorRole="author" xml:id="cr3" affiliationRef="#a2"><personName><givenNames>Niklaus P.</givenNames><familyName>Lang</familyName></personName></creator><creator creatorRole="author" xml:id="cr4" affiliationRef="#a3"><personName><givenNames>Edwin S.Y.</givenNames><familyName>Chan</familyName></personName></creator></creators><affiliationGroup><affiliation xml:id="a1" countryCode="SG"><unparsedAffiliation>National Dental Center, Singapore, Singapore</unparsedAffiliation></affiliation><affiliation xml:id="a2" countryCode="CH"><unparsedAffiliation>School of Dental Medicine, University of Berne, Berne, Switzerland</unparsedAffiliation></affiliation><affiliation xml:id="a3" countryCode="SG"><unparsedAffiliation>Clinical Trials and Epidemiology Research Unit, Singapore, Singapore</unparsedAffiliation></affiliation></affiliationGroup><keywordGroup xml:lang="en"><keyword xml:id="k1">abutment fractures</keyword><keyword xml:id="k2">biological</keyword><keyword xml:id="k3">caries</keyword><keyword xml:id="k4">fixed partial dentures</keyword><keyword xml:id="k5">loss of retention</keyword><keyword xml:id="k6">loss of vitality</keyword><keyword xml:id="k7">material fractures</keyword><keyword xml:id="k8">periodontitis</keyword><keyword xml:id="k9">success</keyword><keyword xml:id="k10">survival</keyword><keyword xml:id="k11">systematic review</keyword><keyword xml:id="k12">technical complications</keyword></keywordGroup><abstractGroup><abstract type="main" xml:lang="en"><p><b>Abstract: </b> The present study was done to determine the long‐term success and survival of fixed partial dentures (FPDs) and to evaluate the risks for failures due to specific biological and technical complications. A MEDLINE search (PubMed) from 1966 up to March 2004 was conducted, as well as hand searching of bibliographies from relevant articles. Nineteen studies from an initial yield of 3658 titles were finally selected and data were extracted independently by three reviewers. Prospective and retrospective cohort studies with a mean follow‐up time of at least 5 years in which patients had been examined clinically at the follow‐up visits were included in the meta‐analysis. Publications only based on patients records, questionnaires or interviews were excluded. Survival of the FPDs was analyzed according to <i>in situ</i> and intact failure risks. Specific biological and technical complications such as caries, loss of vitality and periodontal disease recurrence as well as loss of retention, loss of vitality, tooth and material fractures were also analyzed. The 10‐year probability of survival for fixed partial dentures was 89.1% (95% confidence interval (CI): 81–93.8%) while the probability of success was 71.1% (95% CI: 47.7–85.2%). The 10‐year risk for caries and periodontitis leading to FPD loss was 2.6% and 0.7%, respectively. The 10‐year risk for loss of retention was 6.4%, for abutment fracture 2.1% and for material fractures 3.2%.</p></abstract><abstract type="main" xml:lang="fr"><title type="main">Résumé</title><p>L'étude présente a été effectuée pour déterminer le succès à long terme et la survie des prothèses fixées et d'évaluer les risques d'échecs dûà des complications biologiques et techniques. Une recherche Medline de 1966 à mars 2004 a été effectuée ainsi que manuelle pour les bibliographies des articles pouvant répondre à cette question. Dix‐neuf études ont été tirées à partir de 3 658 titres et les données ont été extraites indépendamment par deux personnes. Les études prospectives et rétrospectives avec un temps de suivi de minimum cinq années dans lesquelles les patients avaient été examinés cliniquement lors du suivi ont été incluses dans cette méta‐analyse. Les publications uniquement basées sur les dossiers des patients, les questionnaires et les interviews ont été exclues. La survie des prothèses a été analysée suivant les risques d'échec et de succès <i>in situ</i>. Des complications techniques et biologiques spécifiques telle que les caries, la perte de vitalité et la réapparition de la maladie parodontale ainsi que la perte de rétention, la perte de vitalité, les fractures dentaires et de matériaux ont également été analysées. La survie à 10 ans pour les prothèses fixées était de 89,1% (intervalle de confiance de 95% : 81,0 à 93,8%) tandis que le succès était de 71,1% (52,2 à 83,6%). Le risque à dix ans pour des caries ou de la parodontite entraînant la perte de la prothèse était respectivement de 2,6 et 0,7%. Le risque à dix années pour la perte de rétention était de 6,4%, de fracture du pilier de 2,1% et de fracture de matériaux de 3,2%.</p></abstract><abstract type="main" xml:lang="de"><title type="main">Zusammenfassung</title><p>Die vorliegende Studie wurde unternommen, um die Langzeiterfolgs‐ und Ueberlebensraten von festsitzenden Brückenrekonstruktionen (FPDs) zu bestimmen und die Risiken für Misserfolge aufgrund spezifischer biologischer und technischer Komplikationen auszuwerten.</p><p>Es wurde eine Medline Suche (PubMed) über einen Zeitraum von 1966 bis März 2004 durchgeführt und die Bibliographien von relevanten Artikeln wurden manuell durchsucht. Von einer anfänglichen Auswahl von 3658 Artikeln wurden schlussendlich 19 ausgewählt und die Daten wurden von drei Rezensenten unabhängig herausgelesen. Es wurden prospektive und retrospektive Kohorten‐Studien mit einer mittleren Beobachtungszeit von mindestens 5 Jahren, in welchen Patienten klinisch nachuntersucht worden waren, in die Meta‐Analyse einbezogen. Publikationen, welche nur auf Einträgen in Krankengeschichten, Fragebogen oder Interviews basierten, wurden ausgeschlossen. Das Ueberleben der FPDs wurde entsprechend des <i>in situ</i> und intakten Misserfolgsrisikos analysiert. Spezifische biologische und technische Komplikationen wie Karies, Vitalitätsverlust und das Auftreten von Parodontalproblemen sowie Retentionsverlust, Zahn‐ und Materialfrakturen wurden ebenfalls analysiert.</p><p>Die Ueberlebensrate von festsitzenden Brückenrekonstruktionen über 10 Jahre betrug 89.1% (95% Vertrauensintervall (CI): 81–93.8%), während die Erfolgsrate 71.1% betrug (95% CI: 52.2–83.6%). Das 10‐Jahres Risiko für Karies und Parodontitis, welche zum Verlust der FPD führen, betrug 2.6% bzw. 0.7%. Das 10‐Jahres Risiko für Retentionsverlust betrug 6.4%, für die Pfeilerfrakturen 2.1% und für Materialfrakturen 3.2%.</p></abstract><abstract type="main" xml:lang="es"><title type="main">Resumen</title><p>El presente estudio se llevó a cabo para determinar el éxito y supervivencia a largo plazo de dentaduras fijas parciales (FPDs) y evaluar los riesgos de fracasos debido a complicaciones biológicas y técnicas específicas.</p><p>Se llevó a cabo una búsqueda por Medline (PubMed) desde 1996 hasta Marzo de 2004 al igual que una búsqueda a mano de bibliografías de artículos relevantes. Finalmente se seleccionaron diecinueve artículos de una cantidad inicial de 3,658 títulos y se extrajeron los datos independientemente por tres revisores. Se incluyeron en este meta‐análisis estudios cohorte prospectivos y retrospectivos con un tiempo de seguimiento medio de 5 años en los que los pacientes se examinaron clínicamente en las visitas de mantenimiento. Se excluyeron publicaciones basadas solamente en las fichas de los pacientes, cuestionarios o entrevistas. Se analizó la supervivencia de los FPDs de acuerdo con los riesgos de fracaso <i>in situ</i> e intacto. También se analizaron las complicaciones biológicas específicas tales como caries, pérdida de vitalidad y recurrencia de enfermedad periodontal al igual que la pérdida de retención, pérdida de vitalidad, fracturas dentales y del material.</p><p>La supervivencia a los diez años para las dentaduras parciales fijas fue del 89.1% (95% intervalo de confianza (CI): 81–93.8%) mientras que el éxito fue del 71.1% (95% CI: 52.2–83.6%). El riesgo de caries a los 10 años y periodontitis que condujo a la pérdida del FPD fue del 2.6% y del 0.7% respectivamente. El riesgo de pérdida de retención a los 10 años fue del 6.4%, para la fractura del pilar del 2.1% y para la fractura del material del 3.2%.</p><p> <inlineGraphic alt="inline image" location="image_n/CLR_1119_fu1.gif" href=""></inlineGraphic> </p></abstract></abstractGroup></contentMeta></header></component></istex:document></istex:metadataXml><mods version="3.6"><titleInfo lang="en"><title>A systematic review of the survival and complication rates of fixed partial dentures (FPDs) after an observation period of at least 5 years</title><subTitle lang="en">III. Conventional FPDs</subTitle></titleInfo><titleInfo lang="de"><title>Eine systematische Uebersicht der Ueberlebens‐ und Komplikationsraten bei festsitzenden Brückenrekonstruktionen (FPDs) über eine Beobachtungszeit von mindestens 5 Jahren III. Konventionelle FPDs</title><subTitle lang="en">III. Conventional FPDs</subTitle></titleInfo><titleInfo type="abbreviated" lang="en"><title>Systematic review of FPDs</title></titleInfo><titleInfo type="alternative" contentType="CDATA" lang="en"><title>A systematic review of the survival and complication rates of fixed partial dentures (FPDs) after an observation period of at least 5 years</title></titleInfo><titleInfo type="alternative" contentType="CDATA" lang="de"><title>Eine systematische Uebersicht der Ueberlebens‐ und Komplikationsraten bei festsitzenden Brückenrekonstruktionen (FPDs) über eine Beobachtungszeit von mindestens 5 Jahren III. Konventionelle FPDs</title></titleInfo><name type="personal"><namePart type="given">Ken</namePart><namePart type="family">Tan</namePart><affiliation>National Dental Center, Singapore, Singapore</affiliation><role><roleTerm type="text">author</roleTerm></role></name><name type="personal"><namePart type="given">Bjarni E.</namePart><namePart type="family">Pjetursson</namePart><affiliation>School of Dental Medicine, University of Berne, Berne, Switzerland</affiliation><role><roleTerm type="text">author</roleTerm></role></name><name type="personal"><namePart type="given">Niklaus P.</namePart><namePart type="family">Lang</namePart><affiliation>School of Dental Medicine, University of Berne, Berne, Switzerland</affiliation><role><roleTerm type="text">author</roleTerm></role></name><name type="personal"><namePart type="given">Edwin S.Y.</namePart><namePart type="family">Chan</namePart><affiliation>Clinical Trials and Epidemiology Research Unit, Singapore, Singapore</affiliation><role><roleTerm type="text">author</roleTerm></role></name><typeOfResource>text</typeOfResource><genre type="article" displayLabel="article" authority="ISTEX" authorityURI="https://content-type.data.istex.fr" valueURI="https://content-type.data.istex.fr/ark:/67375/XTP-6N5SZHKN-D">article</genre><originInfo><publisher>Munksgaard International Publishers</publisher><place><placeTerm type="text">Oxford, UK</placeTerm></place><dateIssued encoding="w3cdtf">2004-12</dateIssued><edition>Date: Accepted 30 June 2004</edition><copyrightDate encoding="w3cdtf">2004</copyrightDate></originInfo><language><languageTerm type="code" authority="rfc3066">en</languageTerm><languageTerm type="code" authority="iso639-2b">eng</languageTerm></language><physicalDescription><extent unit="figures">3</extent><extent unit="tables">11</extent><extent unit="formulas">0</extent><extent unit="references">52</extent><extent unit="linksCrossRef">204</extent><extent unit="words">12732</extent></physicalDescription><abstract>Abstract: The present study was done to determine the long‐term success and survival of fixed partial dentures (FPDs) and to evaluate the risks for failures due to specific biological and technical complications. A MEDLINE search (PubMed) from 1966 up to March 2004 was conducted, as well as hand searching of bibliographies from relevant articles. Nineteen studies from an initial yield of 3658 titles were finally selected and data were extracted independently by three reviewers. Prospective and retrospective cohort studies with a mean follow‐up time of at least 5 years in which patients had been examined clinically at the follow‐up visits were included in the meta‐analysis. Publications only based on patients records, questionnaires or interviews were excluded. Survival of the FPDs was analyzed according to in situ and intact failure risks. Specific biological and technical complications such as caries, loss of vitality and periodontal disease recurrence as well as loss of retention, loss of vitality, tooth and material fractures were also analyzed. The 10‐year probability of survival for fixed partial dentures was 89.1% (95% confidence interval (CI): 81–93.8%) while the probability of success was 71.1% (95% CI: 47.7–85.2%). The 10‐year risk for caries and periodontitis leading to FPD loss was 2.6% and 0.7%, respectively. The 10‐year risk for loss of retention was 6.4%, for abutment fracture 2.1% and for material fractures 3.2%.</abstract><abstract lang="fr">L'étude présente a été effectuée pour déterminer le succès à long terme et la survie des prothèses fixées et d'évaluer les risques d'échecs dûà des complications biologiques et techniques. Une recherche Medline de 1966 à mars 2004 a été effectuée ainsi que manuelle pour les bibliographies des articles pouvant répondre à cette question. Dix‐neuf études ont été tirées à partir de 3 658 titres et les données ont été extraites indépendamment par deux personnes. Les études prospectives et rétrospectives avec un temps de suivi de minimum cinq années dans lesquelles les patients avaient été examinés cliniquement lors du suivi ont été incluses dans cette méta‐analyse. Les publications uniquement basées sur les dossiers des patients, les questionnaires et les interviews ont été exclues. La survie des prothèses a été analysée suivant les risques d'échec et de succès in situ. Des complications techniques et biologiques spécifiques telle que les caries, la perte de vitalité et la réapparition de la maladie parodontale ainsi que la perte de rétention, la perte de vitalité, les fractures dentaires et de matériaux ont également été analysées. La survie à 10 ans pour les prothèses fixées était de 89,1% (intervalle de confiance de 95% : 81,0 à 93,8%) tandis que le succès était de 71,1% (52,2 à 83,6%). Le risque à dix ans pour des caries ou de la parodontite entraînant la perte de la prothèse était respectivement de 2,6 et 0,7%. Le risque à dix années pour la perte de rétention était de 6,4%, de fracture du pilier de 2,1% et de fracture de matériaux de 3,2%.</abstract><abstract lang="de">Die vorliegende Studie wurde unternommen, um die Langzeiterfolgs‐ und Ueberlebensraten von festsitzenden Brückenrekonstruktionen (FPDs) zu bestimmen und die Risiken für Misserfolge aufgrund spezifischer biologischer und technischer Komplikationen auszuwerten. Es wurde eine Medline Suche (PubMed) über einen Zeitraum von 1966 bis März 2004 durchgeführt und die Bibliographien von relevanten Artikeln wurden manuell durchsucht. Von einer anfänglichen Auswahl von 3658 Artikeln wurden schlussendlich 19 ausgewählt und die Daten wurden von drei Rezensenten unabhängig herausgelesen. Es wurden prospektive und retrospektive Kohorten‐Studien mit einer mittleren Beobachtungszeit von mindestens 5 Jahren, in welchen Patienten klinisch nachuntersucht worden waren, in die Meta‐Analyse einbezogen. Publikationen, welche nur auf Einträgen in Krankengeschichten, Fragebogen oder Interviews basierten, wurden ausgeschlossen. Das Ueberleben der FPDs wurde entsprechend des in situ und intakten Misserfolgsrisikos analysiert. Spezifische biologische und technische Komplikationen wie Karies, Vitalitätsverlust und das Auftreten von Parodontalproblemen sowie Retentionsverlust, Zahn‐ und Materialfrakturen wurden ebenfalls analysiert. Die Ueberlebensrate von festsitzenden Brückenrekonstruktionen über 10 Jahre betrug 89.1% (95% Vertrauensintervall (CI): 81–93.8%), während die Erfolgsrate 71.1% betrug (95% CI: 52.2–83.6%). Das 10‐Jahres Risiko für Karies und Parodontitis, welche zum Verlust der FPD führen, betrug 2.6% bzw. 0.7%. Das 10‐Jahres Risiko für Retentionsverlust betrug 6.4%, für die Pfeilerfrakturen 2.1% und für Materialfrakturen 3.2%.</abstract><abstract lang="es">El presente estudio se llevó a cabo para determinar el éxito y supervivencia a largo plazo de dentaduras fijas parciales (FPDs) y evaluar los riesgos de fracasos debido a complicaciones biológicas y técnicas específicas. Se llevó a cabo una búsqueda por Medline (PubMed) desde 1996 hasta Marzo de 2004 al igual que una búsqueda a mano de bibliografías de artículos relevantes. Finalmente se seleccionaron diecinueve artículos de una cantidad inicial de 3,658 títulos y se extrajeron los datos independientemente por tres revisores. Se incluyeron en este meta‐análisis estudios cohorte prospectivos y retrospectivos con un tiempo de seguimiento medio de 5 años en los que los pacientes se examinaron clínicamente en las visitas de mantenimiento. Se excluyeron publicaciones basadas solamente en las fichas de los pacientes, cuestionarios o entrevistas. Se analizó la supervivencia de los FPDs de acuerdo con los riesgos de fracaso in situ e intacto. También se analizaron las complicaciones biológicas específicas tales como caries, pérdida de vitalidad y recurrencia de enfermedad periodontal al igual que la pérdida de retención, pérdida de vitalidad, fracturas dentales y del material. La supervivencia a los diez años para las dentaduras parciales fijas fue del 89.1% (95% intervalo de confianza (CI): 81–93.8%) mientras que el éxito fue del 71.1% (95% CI: 52.2–83.6%). El riesgo de caries a los 10 años y periodontitis que condujo a la pérdida del FPD fue del 2.6% y del 0.7% respectivamente. El riesgo de pérdida de retención a los 10 años fue del 6.4%, para la fractura del pilar del 2.1% y para la fractura del material del 3.2%.</abstract><subject lang="en"><genre>keywords</genre><topic>abutment fractures</topic><topic>biological</topic><topic>caries</topic><topic>fixed partial dentures</topic><topic>loss of retention</topic><topic>loss of vitality</topic><topic>material fractures</topic><topic>periodontitis</topic><topic>success</topic><topic>survival</topic><topic>systematic review</topic><topic>technical complications</topic></subject><relatedItem type="host"><titleInfo><title>Clinical Oral Implants Research</title></titleInfo><genre type="journal" authority="ISTEX" authorityURI="https://publication-type.data.istex.fr" valueURI="https://publication-type.data.istex.fr/ark:/67375/JMC-0GLKJH51-B">journal</genre><identifier type="ISSN">0905-7161</identifier><identifier type="eISSN">1600-0501</identifier><identifier type="DOI">10.1111/(ISSN)1600-0501</identifier><identifier type="PublisherID">CLR</identifier><part><date>2004</date><detail type="volume"><caption>vol.</caption><number>15</number></detail><detail type="issue"><caption>no.</caption><number>6</number></detail><extent unit="pages"><start>654</start><end>666</end><total>13</total></extent></part></relatedItem><identifier type="istex">FB7F3B5F4BC0D2A2CAE3C9FB3532B91A288308C4</identifier><identifier type="ark">ark:/67375/WNG-1RW1RCWD-S</identifier><identifier type="DOI">10.1111/j.1600-0501.2004.01119.x</identifier><identifier type="ArticleID">CLR1119</identifier><recordInfo><recordContentSource authority="ISTEX" authorityURI="https://loaded-corpus.data.istex.fr" valueURI="https://loaded-corpus.data.istex.fr/ark:/67375/XBH-L0C46X92-X">wiley</recordContentSource><recordOrigin>Munksgaard International Publishers</recordOrigin></recordInfo></mods><json:item><extension>json</extension><original>false</original><mimetype>application/json</mimetype><uri>https://api.istex.fr/document/FB7F3B5F4BC0D2A2CAE3C9FB3532B91A288308C4/metadata/json</uri></json:item></metadata><serie></serie></istex></record>Pour manipuler ce document sous Unix (Dilib)
EXPLOR_STEP=$WICRI_ROOT/Wicri/Santé/explor/EdenteV2/Data/Istex/Corpus
HfdSelect -h $EXPLOR_STEP/biblio.hfd -nk 007C41 | SxmlIndent | more
Ou
HfdSelect -h $EXPLOR_AREA/Data/Istex/Corpus/biblio.hfd -nk 007C41 | SxmlIndent | more
Pour mettre un lien sur cette page dans le réseau Wicri
{{Explor lien
|wiki= Wicri/Santé
|area= EdenteV2
|flux= Istex
|étape= Corpus
|type= RBID
|clé= ISTEX:FB7F3B5F4BC0D2A2CAE3C9FB3532B91A288308C4
|texte= A systematic review of the survival and complication rates of fixed partial dentures (FPDs) after an observation period of at least 5 years
}}
| This area was generated with Dilib version V0.6.32. |  |