Relative contribution of restorative treatment to tooth extraction in a teaching institution
Identifieur interne : 007B91 ( Istex/Corpus ); précédent : 007B90; suivant : 007B92Relative contribution of restorative treatment to tooth extraction in a teaching institution
Auteurs : Q. D. Alomari ; M. E. Khalaf ; N. M. Al-ShawafSource :
- Journal of Oral Rehabilitation [ 0305-182X ] ; 2013-06.
English descriptors
- KwdEn :
- Background variables, Caries, Dent, Dentistry, Education level, Educational level, Endodontically, Ethical review committee, Extraction, Gender, General model, General modelling, High school, High school diploma, Interval parameter estimate, Irreversible pulpitis, John wiley sons, Kuwait, Kuwait university, Large amalgam restorations, Lower anteriors, Lower molars, Lower premolars, Main reason, Mandibular molars, Molar, Necrotic pulps, Odds ratios, Oral pathol, Oral surg, Orthodontic reasons, Patient records, Periodontal, Periodontal disease, Permanent teeth, Premolar, Previous studies, Prospective study, Pulp status, Radiol endod, Relative contribution, Restorative, Restorative failure, Restorative failures, Restorative sciences, Restorative treatment, Restorative treatment type, Restorative treatments, Root canal, Root canal treatment, Sample size, Secondary caries, Similar results, Step model, Tooth, Tooth extraction, Tooth extraction table, Tooth loss, Tooth loss effects, Tooth loss prevention, Tooth type, Upper anteriors, Upper molars, Upper premolars.
- Teeft :
- Background variables, Caries, Dent, Dentistry, Education level, Educational level, Endodontically, Ethical review committee, Extraction, Gender, General model, General modelling, High school, High school diploma, Interval parameter estimate, Irreversible pulpitis, John wiley sons, Kuwait, Kuwait university, Large amalgam restorations, Lower anteriors, Lower molars, Lower premolars, Main reason, Mandibular molars, Molar, Necrotic pulps, Odds ratios, Oral pathol, Oral surg, Orthodontic reasons, Patient records, Periodontal, Periodontal disease, Permanent teeth, Premolar, Previous studies, Prospective study, Pulp status, Radiol endod, Relative contribution, Restorative, Restorative failure, Restorative failures, Restorative sciences, Restorative treatment, Restorative treatment type, Restorative treatments, Root canal, Root canal treatment, Sample size, Secondary caries, Similar results, Step model, Tooth, Tooth extraction, Tooth extraction table, Tooth loss, Tooth loss effects, Tooth loss prevention, Tooth type, Upper anteriors, Upper molars, Upper premolars.
Abstract
Teeth can be extracted due to multiple factors. The aim of this retrospective cross‐sectional study was to identify the relative contribution of restorative treatments to tooth loss. The study reviewed records of 826 patients (1102 teeth). Patient's gender, age and education were obtained. In addition to the main reason for extraction (caries, periodontal disease, pre‐prosthetic extraction, restorative failure and remaining root), the following information was collected about each extracted tooth: type, the status of caries if any (primary or secondary) and pulpal status (normal or reversible pulpitis, irreversible pulpitis, necrotic or root canal treated) and type and size of restoration, if present. Following data collection, descriptive analysis was performed. A log‐linear model was used to examine the association between restorative treatment and tooth loss and between reasons for tooth loss and type of tooth. Lower molars followed by upper molars were the most commonly extracted teeth. Teeth with no restorations or with crowns were less likely to be extracted (P < 0·001). Lower and upper molars and lower premolars were more likely to be extracted due to restorative failure, while lower anterior teeth were more likely to be extracted due to periodontal disease (P < 0·05). Twenty two per cent of the extractions was due to restorative failure, and at least 65·9% of these teeth had secondary caries. Gender, age and educational level were factors that affect tooth loss. In conclusion, teeth receiving multiple restorative therapies were more likely to be extracted.
Url:
DOI: 10.1111/joor.12056
Links to Exploration step
ISTEX:FA4D6E5227AC963A5C5424D898B559BBCEA3B96ALe document en format XML
<record><TEI wicri:istexFullTextTei="biblStruct"><teiHeader><fileDesc><titleStmt><title xml:lang="en">Relative contribution of restorative treatment to tooth extraction in a teaching institution</title><author><name sortKey="Alomari, Q D" sort="Alomari, Q D" uniqKey="Alomari Q" first="Q. D." last="Alomari">Q. D. Alomari</name><affiliation><mods:affiliation>Department of Restorative Sciences, Faculty of Dentistry, Kuwait University, Safat, Kuwait</mods:affiliation></affiliation><affiliation><mods:affiliation>E-mail: qalomari@hsc.edu.kw</mods:affiliation></affiliation></author><author><name sortKey="Khalaf, M E" sort="Khalaf, M E" uniqKey="Khalaf M" first="M. E." last="Khalaf">M. E. Khalaf</name><affiliation><mods:affiliation>Department of Restorative Sciences, Faculty of Dentistry, Kuwait University, Safat, Kuwait</mods:affiliation></affiliation></author><author><name sortKey="Al Hawaf, N M" sort="Al Hawaf, N M" uniqKey="Al Hawaf N" first="N. M." last="Al-Shawaf">N. M. Al-Shawaf</name><affiliation><mods:affiliation>Department of Restorative Sciences, Faculty of Dentistry, Kuwait University, Safat, Kuwait</mods:affiliation></affiliation></author></titleStmt><publicationStmt><idno type="wicri:source">ISTEX</idno><idno type="RBID">ISTEX:FA4D6E5227AC963A5C5424D898B559BBCEA3B96A</idno><date when="2013" year="2013">2013</date><idno type="doi">10.1111/joor.12056</idno><idno type="url">https://api.istex.fr/document/FA4D6E5227AC963A5C5424D898B559BBCEA3B96A/fulltext/pdf</idno><idno type="wicri:Area/Istex/Corpus">007B91</idno><idno type="wicri:explorRef" wicri:stream="Istex" wicri:step="Corpus" wicri:corpus="ISTEX">007B91</idno></publicationStmt><sourceDesc><biblStruct><analytic><title level="a" type="main">Relative contribution of restorative treatment to tooth extraction in a teaching institution</title><author><name sortKey="Alomari, Q D" sort="Alomari, Q D" uniqKey="Alomari Q" first="Q. D." last="Alomari">Q. D. Alomari</name><affiliation><mods:affiliation>Department of Restorative Sciences, Faculty of Dentistry, Kuwait University, Safat, Kuwait</mods:affiliation></affiliation><affiliation><mods:affiliation>E-mail: qalomari@hsc.edu.kw</mods:affiliation></affiliation></author><author><name sortKey="Khalaf, M E" sort="Khalaf, M E" uniqKey="Khalaf M" first="M. E." last="Khalaf">M. E. Khalaf</name><affiliation><mods:affiliation>Department of Restorative Sciences, Faculty of Dentistry, Kuwait University, Safat, Kuwait</mods:affiliation></affiliation></author><author><name sortKey="Al Hawaf, N M" sort="Al Hawaf, N M" uniqKey="Al Hawaf N" first="N. M." last="Al-Shawaf">N. M. Al-Shawaf</name><affiliation><mods:affiliation>Department of Restorative Sciences, Faculty of Dentistry, Kuwait University, Safat, Kuwait</mods:affiliation></affiliation></author></analytic><monogr></monogr><series><title level="j" type="main">Journal of Oral Rehabilitation</title><title level="j" type="alt">JOURNAL OF ORAL REHABILITATION</title><idno type="ISSN">0305-182X</idno><idno type="eISSN">1365-2842</idno><imprint><biblScope unit="vol">40</biblScope><biblScope unit="issue">6</biblScope><biblScope unit="page" from="464">464</biblScope><biblScope unit="page" to="471">471</biblScope><biblScope unit="page-count">8</biblScope><date type="published" when="2013-06">2013-06</date></imprint><idno type="ISSN">0305-182X</idno></series></biblStruct></sourceDesc><seriesStmt><idno type="ISSN">0305-182X</idno></seriesStmt></fileDesc><profileDesc><textClass><keywords scheme="KwdEn" xml:lang="en"><term>Background variables</term><term>Caries</term><term>Dent</term><term>Dentistry</term><term>Education level</term><term>Educational level</term><term>Endodontically</term><term>Ethical review committee</term><term>Extraction</term><term>Gender</term><term>General model</term><term>General modelling</term><term>High school</term><term>High school diploma</term><term>Interval parameter estimate</term><term>Irreversible pulpitis</term><term>John wiley sons</term><term>Kuwait</term><term>Kuwait university</term><term>Large amalgam restorations</term><term>Lower anteriors</term><term>Lower molars</term><term>Lower premolars</term><term>Main reason</term><term>Mandibular molars</term><term>Molar</term><term>Necrotic pulps</term><term>Odds ratios</term><term>Oral pathol</term><term>Oral surg</term><term>Orthodontic reasons</term><term>Patient records</term><term>Periodontal</term><term>Periodontal disease</term><term>Permanent teeth</term><term>Premolar</term><term>Previous studies</term><term>Prospective study</term><term>Pulp status</term><term>Radiol endod</term><term>Relative contribution</term><term>Restorative</term><term>Restorative failure</term><term>Restorative failures</term><term>Restorative sciences</term><term>Restorative treatment</term><term>Restorative treatment type</term><term>Restorative treatments</term><term>Root canal</term><term>Root canal treatment</term><term>Sample size</term><term>Secondary caries</term><term>Similar results</term><term>Step model</term><term>Tooth</term><term>Tooth extraction</term><term>Tooth extraction table</term><term>Tooth loss</term><term>Tooth loss effects</term><term>Tooth loss prevention</term><term>Tooth type</term><term>Upper anteriors</term><term>Upper molars</term><term>Upper premolars</term></keywords><keywords scheme="Teeft" xml:lang="en"><term>Background variables</term><term>Caries</term><term>Dent</term><term>Dentistry</term><term>Education level</term><term>Educational level</term><term>Endodontically</term><term>Ethical review committee</term><term>Extraction</term><term>Gender</term><term>General model</term><term>General modelling</term><term>High school</term><term>High school diploma</term><term>Interval parameter estimate</term><term>Irreversible pulpitis</term><term>John wiley sons</term><term>Kuwait</term><term>Kuwait university</term><term>Large amalgam restorations</term><term>Lower anteriors</term><term>Lower molars</term><term>Lower premolars</term><term>Main reason</term><term>Mandibular molars</term><term>Molar</term><term>Necrotic pulps</term><term>Odds ratios</term><term>Oral pathol</term><term>Oral surg</term><term>Orthodontic reasons</term><term>Patient records</term><term>Periodontal</term><term>Periodontal disease</term><term>Permanent teeth</term><term>Premolar</term><term>Previous studies</term><term>Prospective study</term><term>Pulp status</term><term>Radiol endod</term><term>Relative contribution</term><term>Restorative</term><term>Restorative failure</term><term>Restorative failures</term><term>Restorative sciences</term><term>Restorative treatment</term><term>Restorative treatment type</term><term>Restorative treatments</term><term>Root canal</term><term>Root canal treatment</term><term>Sample size</term><term>Secondary caries</term><term>Similar results</term><term>Step model</term><term>Tooth</term><term>Tooth extraction</term><term>Tooth extraction table</term><term>Tooth loss</term><term>Tooth loss effects</term><term>Tooth loss prevention</term><term>Tooth type</term><term>Upper anteriors</term><term>Upper molars</term><term>Upper premolars</term></keywords></textClass></profileDesc></teiHeader><front><div type="abstract" xml:lang="en">Teeth can be extracted due to multiple factors. The aim of this retrospective cross‐sectional study was to identify the relative contribution of restorative treatments to tooth loss. The study reviewed records of 826 patients (1102 teeth). Patient's gender, age and education were obtained. In addition to the main reason for extraction (caries, periodontal disease, pre‐prosthetic extraction, restorative failure and remaining root), the following information was collected about each extracted tooth: type, the status of caries if any (primary or secondary) and pulpal status (normal or reversible pulpitis, irreversible pulpitis, necrotic or root canal treated) and type and size of restoration, if present. Following data collection, descriptive analysis was performed. A log‐linear model was used to examine the association between restorative treatment and tooth loss and between reasons for tooth loss and type of tooth. Lower molars followed by upper molars were the most commonly extracted teeth. Teeth with no restorations or with crowns were less likely to be extracted (P < 0·001). Lower and upper molars and lower premolars were more likely to be extracted due to restorative failure, while lower anterior teeth were more likely to be extracted due to periodontal disease (P < 0·05). Twenty two per cent of the extractions was due to restorative failure, and at least 65·9% of these teeth had secondary caries. Gender, age and educational level were factors that affect tooth loss. In conclusion, teeth receiving multiple restorative therapies were more likely to be extracted.</div></front></TEI><istex><corpusName>wiley</corpusName><keywords><teeft><json:string>tooth loss</json:string><json:string>caries</json:string><json:string>restorative treatment</json:string><json:string>periodontal disease</json:string><json:string>periodontal</json:string><json:string>tooth extraction</json:string><json:string>restorative failure</json:string><json:string>endodontically</json:string><json:string>premolar</json:string><json:string>kuwait</json:string><json:string>molar</json:string><json:string>john wiley sons</json:string><json:string>background variables</json:string><json:string>main reason</json:string><json:string>extraction</json:string><json:string>kuwait university</json:string><json:string>educational level</json:string><json:string>step model</json:string><json:string>root canal treatment</json:string><json:string>upper molars</json:string><json:string>lower molars</json:string><json:string>education level</json:string><json:string>high school</json:string><json:string>restorative failures</json:string><json:string>similar results</json:string><json:string>relative contribution</json:string><json:string>dentistry</json:string><json:string>restorative</json:string><json:string>irreversible pulpitis</json:string><json:string>pulp status</json:string><json:string>restorative treatments</json:string><json:string>lower anteriors</json:string><json:string>permanent teeth</json:string><json:string>orthodontic reasons</json:string><json:string>odds ratios</json:string><json:string>gender</json:string><json:string>dent</json:string><json:string>tooth</json:string><json:string>tooth extraction table</json:string><json:string>sample size</json:string><json:string>ethical review committee</json:string><json:string>large amalgam restorations</json:string><json:string>secondary caries</json:string><json:string>necrotic pulps</json:string><json:string>lower premolars</json:string><json:string>general model</json:string><json:string>restorative treatment type</json:string><json:string>general modelling</json:string><json:string>root canal</json:string><json:string>upper premolars</json:string><json:string>tooth type</json:string><json:string>interval parameter estimate</json:string><json:string>tooth loss effects</json:string><json:string>high school diploma</json:string><json:string>restorative sciences</json:string><json:string>upper anteriors</json:string><json:string>mandibular molars</json:string><json:string>previous studies</json:string><json:string>tooth loss prevention</json:string><json:string>prospective study</json:string><json:string>patient records</json:string><json:string>oral surg</json:string><json:string>oral pathol</json:string><json:string>radiol endod</json:string></teeft></keywords><author><json:item><name>Q. D. Alomari</name><affiliations><json:string>Department of Restorative Sciences, Faculty of Dentistry, Kuwait University, Safat, Kuwait</json:string><json:string>E-mail: qalomari@hsc.edu.kw</json:string></affiliations></json:item><json:item><name>M. E. Khalaf</name><affiliations><json:string>Department of Restorative Sciences, Faculty of Dentistry, Kuwait University, Safat, Kuwait</json:string></affiliations></json:item><json:item><name>N. M. Al‐Shawaf</name><affiliations><json:string>Department of Restorative Sciences, Faculty of Dentistry, Kuwait University, Safat, Kuwait</json:string></affiliations></json:item></author><subject><json:item><lang><json:string>eng</json:string></lang><value>dentistry</value></json:item><json:item><lang><json:string>eng</json:string></lang><value>restorative</value></json:item><json:item><lang><json:string>eng</json:string></lang><value>tooth extraction</value></json:item><json:item><lang><json:string>eng</json:string></lang><value>cross‐sectional</value></json:item><json:item><lang><json:string>eng</json:string></lang><value>reasons</value></json:item><json:item><lang><json:string>eng</json:string></lang><value>teaching hospital</value></json:item></subject><articleId><json:string>JOOR12056</json:string></articleId><arkIstex>ark:/67375/WNG-T4WSFGRJ-2</arkIstex><language><json:string>eng</json:string></language><originalGenre><json:string>article</json:string></originalGenre><abstract>Teeth can be extracted due to multiple factors. The aim of this retrospective cross‐sectional study was to identify the relative contribution of restorative treatments to tooth loss. The study reviewed records of 826 patients (1102 teeth). Patient's gender, age and education were obtained. In addition to the main reason for extraction (caries, periodontal disease, pre‐prosthetic extraction, restorative failure and remaining root), the following information was collected about each extracted tooth: type, the status of caries if any (primary or secondary) and pulpal status (normal or reversible pulpitis, irreversible pulpitis, necrotic or root canal treated) and type and size of restoration, if present. Following data collection, descriptive analysis was performed. A log‐linear model was used to examine the association between restorative treatment and tooth loss and between reasons for tooth loss and type of tooth. Lower molars followed by upper molars were the most commonly extracted teeth. Teeth with no restorations or with crowns were less likely to be extracted (P > 0·001). Lower and upper molars and lower premolars were more likely to be extracted due to restorative failure, while lower anterior teeth were more likely to be extracted due to periodontal disease (P > 0·05). Twenty two per cent of the extractions was due to restorative failure, and at least 65·9% of these teeth had secondary caries. Gender, age and educational level were factors that affect tooth loss. In conclusion, teeth receiving multiple restorative therapies were more likely to be extracted.</abstract><qualityIndicators><score>8.758</score><pdfWordCount>3902</pdfWordCount><pdfCharCount>25850</pdfCharCount><pdfVersion>1.7</pdfVersion><pdfPageCount>8</pdfPageCount><pdfPageSize>595.276 x 782.362 pts</pdfPageSize><refBibsNative>true</refBibsNative><abstractWordCount>238</abstractWordCount><abstractCharCount>1590</abstractCharCount><keywordCount>6</keywordCount></qualityIndicators><title>Relative contribution of restorative treatment to tooth extraction in a teaching institution</title><pmid><json:string>23600993</json:string></pmid><genre><json:string>article</json:string></genre><host><title>Journal of Oral Rehabilitation</title><language><json:string>unknown</json:string></language><doi><json:string>10.1111/(ISSN)1365-2842</json:string></doi><issn><json:string>0305-182X</json:string></issn><eissn><json:string>1365-2842</json:string></eissn><publisherId><json:string>JOOR</json:string></publisherId><volume>40</volume><issue>6</issue><pages><first>464</first><last>471</last><total>8</total></pages><genre><json:string>journal</json:string></genre><subject><json:item><value>Original Article</value></json:item></subject></host><namedEntities><unitex><date><json:string>1102</json:string><json:string>2013-04-04</json:string></date><geogName></geogName><orgName><json:string>SPSS Inc., Chicago</json:string><json:string>Sons Ltd</json:string><json:string>Kuwait University, Faculty of Dentistry Comprehensive Dental Care Clinics</json:string><json:string>KUDC</json:string><json:string>Kuwait University Dental Center</json:string><json:string>Ethical Review Committee of the Faculty of Dentistry, Kuwait University</json:string><json:string>CDC</json:string></orgName><orgName_funder></orgName_funder><orgName_provider></orgName_provider><persName><json:string>John Wiley</json:string></persName><placeName><json:string>Germany</json:string><json:string>Brazil</json:string><json:string>Sweden</json:string></placeName><ref_url></ref_url><ref_bibl><json:string>Chen et al.</json:string></ref_bibl><bibl></bibl></unitex></namedEntities><ark><json:string>ark:/67375/WNG-T4WSFGRJ-2</json:string></ark><categories><wos><json:string>1 - science</json:string><json:string>2 - dentistry, oral surgery & medicine</json:string></wos><scienceMetrix><json:string>1 - health sciences</json:string><json:string>2 - clinical medicine</json:string><json:string>3 - dentistry</json:string></scienceMetrix><scopus><json:string>1 - Health Sciences</json:string><json:string>2 - Dentistry</json:string><json:string>3 - General Dentistry</json:string></scopus><inist><json:string>1 - sciences appliquees, technologies et medecines</json:string><json:string>2 - sciences biologiques et medicales</json:string><json:string>3 - sciences medicales</json:string><json:string>4 - otorhinolaryngologie. stomatologie</json:string></inist></categories><publicationDate>2013</publicationDate><copyrightDate>2013</copyrightDate><doi><json:string>10.1111/joor.12056</json:string></doi><id>FA4D6E5227AC963A5C5424D898B559BBCEA3B96A</id><score>1</score><fulltext><json:item><extension>pdf</extension><original>true</original><mimetype>application/pdf</mimetype><uri>https://api.istex.fr/document/FA4D6E5227AC963A5C5424D898B559BBCEA3B96A/fulltext/pdf</uri></json:item><json:item><extension>zip</extension><original>false</original><mimetype>application/zip</mimetype><uri>https://api.istex.fr/document/FA4D6E5227AC963A5C5424D898B559BBCEA3B96A/fulltext/zip</uri></json:item><istex:fulltextTEI uri="https://api.istex.fr/document/FA4D6E5227AC963A5C5424D898B559BBCEA3B96A/fulltext/tei"><teiHeader><fileDesc><titleStmt><title level="a" type="main">Relative contribution of restorative treatment to tooth extraction in a teaching institution</title></titleStmt><publicationStmt><authority>ISTEX</authority><publisher>Wiley Publishing Ltd</publisher><availability><licence>© 2013 John Wiley & Sons Ltd</licence></availability><date type="published" when="2013-06"></date></publicationStmt><notesStmt><note type="content-type" subtype="article" source="article" scheme="https://content-type.data.istex.fr/ark:/67375/XTP-6N5SZHKN-D">article</note><note type="publication-type" subtype="journal" scheme="https://publication-type.data.istex.fr/ark:/67375/JMC-0GLKJH51-B">journal</note></notesStmt><sourceDesc><biblStruct type="article"><analytic><title level="a" type="main">Relative contribution of restorative treatment to tooth extraction in a teaching institution</title><author xml:id="author-0000" role="corresp"><persName><forename type="first">Q. D.</forename><surname>Alomari</surname></persName><affiliation><orgName>Department of Restorative Sciences</orgName><orgName>Faculty of Dentistry</orgName><orgName>Kuwait University</orgName><address><settlement type="city">Safat</settlement><country key="KW">Kuwait</country></address></affiliation><affiliation>Correspondence: Qasem D. Alomari, Department of Restorative Sciences, Faculty of Dentistry, Kuwait University, P.O. Box 24923, Safat 13110, Kuwait. E‐mail: qalomari@hsc.edu.kw</affiliation></author><author xml:id="author-0001"><persName><forename type="first">M. E.</forename><surname>Khalaf</surname></persName><affiliation><orgName>Department of Restorative Sciences</orgName><orgName>Faculty of Dentistry</orgName><orgName>Kuwait University</orgName><address><settlement type="city">Safat</settlement><country key="KW">Kuwait</country></address></affiliation></author><author xml:id="author-0002"><persName><forename type="first">N. M.</forename><surname>Al‐Shawaf</surname></persName><affiliation><orgName>Department of Restorative Sciences</orgName><orgName>Faculty of Dentistry</orgName><orgName>Kuwait University</orgName><address><settlement type="city">Safat</settlement><country key="KW">Kuwait</country></address></affiliation></author><idno type="istex">FA4D6E5227AC963A5C5424D898B559BBCEA3B96A</idno><idno type="ark">ark:/67375/WNG-T4WSFGRJ-2</idno><idno type="DOI">10.1111/joor.12056</idno><idno type="unit">JOOR12056</idno><idno type="toTypesetVersion">file:JOOR.JOOR12056.pdf</idno></analytic><monogr><title level="j" type="main">Journal of Oral Rehabilitation</title><title level="j" type="alt">JOURNAL OF ORAL REHABILITATION</title><idno type="pISSN">0305-182X</idno><idno type="eISSN">1365-2842</idno><idno type="book-DOI">10.1111/(ISSN)1365-2842</idno><idno type="book-part-DOI">10.1111/joor.2013.40.issue-6</idno><idno type="product">JOOR</idno><imprint><biblScope unit="vol">40</biblScope><biblScope unit="issue">6</biblScope><biblScope unit="page" from="464">464</biblScope><biblScope unit="page" to="471">471</biblScope><biblScope unit="page-count">8</biblScope><date type="published" when="2013-06"></date></imprint></monogr></biblStruct></sourceDesc></fileDesc><profileDesc><abstract xml:lang="en" style="main" xml:id="joor12056-abs-0001"><head>Summary</head><p>Teeth can be extracted due to multiple factors. The aim of this retrospective cross‐sectional study was to identify the relative contribution of restorative treatments to tooth loss. The study reviewed records of 826 patients (1102 teeth). Patient's gender, age and education were obtained. In addition to the main reason for extraction (caries, periodontal disease, pre‐prosthetic extraction, restorative failure and remaining root), the following information was collected about each extracted tooth: type, the status of caries if any (primary or secondary) and pulpal status (normal or reversible pulpitis, irreversible pulpitis, necrotic or root canal treated) and type and size of restoration, if present. Following data collection, descriptive analysis was performed. A log‐linear model was used to examine the association between restorative treatment and tooth loss and between reasons for tooth loss and type of tooth. Lower molars followed by upper molars were the most commonly extracted teeth. Teeth with no restorations or with crowns were less likely to be extracted (<hi rend="italic">P </hi><<hi rend="italic"> </hi>0·001). Lower and upper molars and lower premolars were more likely to be extracted due to restorative failure, while lower anterior teeth were more likely to be extracted due to periodontal disease (<hi rend="italic">P </hi><<hi rend="italic"> </hi>0·05). Twenty two per cent of the extractions was due to restorative failure, and at least 65·9% of these teeth had secondary caries. Gender, age and educational level were factors that affect tooth loss. In conclusion, teeth receiving multiple restorative therapies were more likely to be extracted.</p></abstract><textClass><keywords><term xml:id="joor12056-kwd-0001">dentistry</term><term xml:id="joor12056-kwd-0002">restorative</term><term xml:id="joor12056-kwd-0003">tooth extraction</term><term xml:id="joor12056-kwd-0004">cross‐sectional</term><term xml:id="joor12056-kwd-0005">reasons</term><term xml:id="joor12056-kwd-0006">teaching hospital</term></keywords><keywords rend="articleCategory"><term>Original Article</term></keywords><keywords rend="tocHeading1"><term>Original Articles</term></keywords></textClass><langUsage><language ident="en"></language></langUsage></profileDesc></teiHeader></istex:fulltextTEI><json:item><extension>txt</extension><original>false</original><mimetype>text/plain</mimetype><uri>https://api.istex.fr/document/FA4D6E5227AC963A5C5424D898B559BBCEA3B96A/fulltext/txt</uri></json:item></fulltext><metadata><istex:metadataXml wicri:clean="Wiley, elements deleted: body"><istex:xmlDeclaration>version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" standalone="yes"</istex:xmlDeclaration><istex:document><component type="serialArticle" version="2.0" xml:id="joor12056" xml:lang="en"><header><publicationMeta level="product"><doi origin="wiley" registered="yes">10.1111/(ISSN)1365-2842</doi><issn type="print">0305-182X</issn><issn type="electronic">1365-2842</issn><idGroup><id type="product" value="JOOR"></id></idGroup><titleGroup><title sort="JOURNAL OF ORAL REHABILITATION" type="main">Journal of Oral Rehabilitation</title><title type="short">J Oral Rehabil</title></titleGroup></publicationMeta><publicationMeta level="part" position="06106"><doi origin="wiley">10.1111/joor.2013.40.issue-6</doi><copyright ownership="publisher">Copyright © 2013 John Wiley & Sons Ltd</copyright><numberingGroup><numbering type="journalVolume" number="40">40</numbering><numbering type="journalIssue">6</numbering></numberingGroup><coverDate startDate="2013-06">June 2013</coverDate></publicationMeta><publicationMeta level="unit" position="90" status="forIssue" type="article"><doi>10.1111/joor.12056</doi><idGroup><id type="unit" value="JOOR12056"></id></idGroup><countGroup><count number="8" type="pageTotal"></count></countGroup><titleGroup><title type="articleCategory">Original Article</title><title type="tocHeading1">Original Articles</title></titleGroup><copyright ownership="publisher">© 2013 John Wiley & Sons Ltd</copyright><eventGroup><event date="2013-03-27" type="manuscriptAccepted"></event><event agent="SPS" date="2013-04-04" type="xmlCreated"></event><event type="publishedOnlineEarlyUnpaginated" date="2013-04-19"></event><event type="firstOnline" date="2013-04-19"></event><event type="publishedOnlineFinalForm" date="2013-05-13"></event><event type="xmlConverted" agent="Converter:WILEY_ML3G_TO_WILEY_ML3GV2 version:4.0.1" date="2014-03-20"></event><event type="xmlConverted" agent="Converter:WML3G_To_WML3G version:4.6.4 mode:FullText" date="2015-10-03"></event></eventGroup><numberingGroup><numbering type="pageFirst">464</numbering><numbering type="pageLast">471</numbering></numberingGroup><correspondenceTo>Correspondence: Qasem D. Alomari, Department of Restorative Sciences, Faculty of Dentistry, Kuwait University, P.O. Box 24923, Safat 13110, Kuwait. E‐mail: <email>qalomari@hsc.edu.kw</email></correspondenceTo><linkGroup><link type="toTypesetVersion" href="file:JOOR.JOOR12056.pdf"></link></linkGroup></publicationMeta><contentMeta><titleGroup><title type="main">Relative contribution of restorative treatment to tooth extraction in a teaching institution</title><title type="shortAuthors">Q. D. Alomari <i>et al</i>.</title></titleGroup><creators><creator affiliationRef="#joor12056-aff-0001" corresponding="yes" creatorRole="author" xml:id="joor12056-cr-0001"><personName><givenNames>Q. D.</givenNames> <familyName>Alomari</familyName></personName></creator><creator affiliationRef="#joor12056-aff-0001" creatorRole="author" xml:id="joor12056-cr-0002"><personName><givenNames>M. E.</givenNames> <familyName>Khalaf</familyName></personName></creator><creator affiliationRef="#joor12056-aff-0001" creatorRole="author" xml:id="joor12056-cr-0003"><personName><givenNames>N. M.</givenNames> <familyName>Al‐Shawaf</familyName></personName></creator></creators><affiliationGroup><affiliation countryCode="KW" type="organization" xml:id="joor12056-aff-0001"><orgDiv>Department of Restorative Sciences</orgDiv> <orgDiv>Faculty of Dentistry</orgDiv> <orgName>Kuwait University</orgName> <address><city>Safat</city> <country>Kuwait</country></address></affiliation></affiliationGroup><keywordGroup type="author"><keyword xml:id="joor12056-kwd-0001">dentistry</keyword><keyword xml:id="joor12056-kwd-0002">restorative</keyword><keyword xml:id="joor12056-kwd-0003">tooth extraction</keyword><keyword xml:id="joor12056-kwd-0004">cross‐sectional</keyword><keyword xml:id="joor12056-kwd-0005">reasons</keyword><keyword xml:id="joor12056-kwd-0006">teaching hospital</keyword></keywordGroup><abstractGroup><abstract type="main" xml:id="joor12056-abs-0001" xml:lang="en"><title type="main">Summary</title><p>Teeth can be extracted due to multiple factors. The aim of this retrospective cross‐sectional study was to identify the relative contribution of restorative treatments to tooth loss. The study reviewed records of 826 patients (1102 teeth). Patient's gender, age and education were obtained. In addition to the main reason for extraction (caries, periodontal disease, pre‐prosthetic extraction, restorative failure and remaining root), the following information was collected about each extracted tooth: type, the status of caries if any (primary or secondary) and pulpal status (normal or reversible pulpitis, irreversible pulpitis, necrotic or root canal treated) and type and size of restoration, if present. Following data collection, descriptive analysis was performed. A log‐linear model was used to examine the association between restorative treatment and tooth loss and between reasons for tooth loss and type of tooth. Lower molars followed by upper molars were the most commonly extracted teeth. Teeth with no restorations or with crowns were less likely to be extracted (<i>P </i><<i> </i>0·001). Lower and upper molars and lower premolars were more likely to be extracted due to restorative failure, while lower anterior teeth were more likely to be extracted due to periodontal disease (<i>P </i><<i> </i>0·05). Twenty two per cent of the extractions was due to restorative failure, and at least 65·9% of these teeth had secondary caries. Gender, age and educational level were factors that affect tooth loss. In conclusion, teeth receiving multiple restorative therapies were more likely to be extracted.</p></abstract></abstractGroup></contentMeta><noteGroup xml:id="joor12056-ntgp-0001"><note numbered="no" xml:id="joor12056-note-0001">Type of the study: Cross‐sectional observational study.</note></noteGroup></header></component></istex:document></istex:metadataXml><mods version="3.6"><titleInfo lang="en"><title>Relative contribution of restorative treatment to tooth extraction in a teaching institution</title></titleInfo><titleInfo type="alternative" contentType="CDATA" lang="en"><title>Relative contribution of restorative treatment to tooth extraction in a teaching institution</title></titleInfo><name type="personal"><namePart type="given">Q. D.</namePart><namePart type="family">Alomari</namePart><affiliation>Department of Restorative Sciences, Faculty of Dentistry, Kuwait University, Safat, Kuwait</affiliation><affiliation>E-mail: qalomari@hsc.edu.kw</affiliation><role><roleTerm type="text">author</roleTerm></role></name><name type="personal"><namePart type="given">M. E.</namePart><namePart type="family">Khalaf</namePart><affiliation>Department of Restorative Sciences, Faculty of Dentistry, Kuwait University, Safat, Kuwait</affiliation><role><roleTerm type="text">author</roleTerm></role></name><name type="personal"><namePart type="given">N. M.</namePart><namePart type="family">Al‐Shawaf</namePart><affiliation>Department of Restorative Sciences, Faculty of Dentistry, Kuwait University, Safat, Kuwait</affiliation><role><roleTerm type="text">author</roleTerm></role></name><typeOfResource>text</typeOfResource><genre type="article" displayLabel="article" authority="ISTEX" authorityURI="https://content-type.data.istex.fr" valueURI="https://content-type.data.istex.fr/ark:/67375/XTP-6N5SZHKN-D">article</genre><originInfo><publisher>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</publisher><dateIssued encoding="w3cdtf">2013-06</dateIssued><dateCreated encoding="w3cdtf">2013-04-04</dateCreated><dateValid encoding="w3cdtf">2013-03-27</dateValid><copyrightDate encoding="w3cdtf">2013</copyrightDate></originInfo><language><languageTerm type="code" authority="rfc3066">en</languageTerm><languageTerm type="code" authority="iso639-2b">eng</languageTerm></language><abstract lang="en">Teeth can be extracted due to multiple factors. The aim of this retrospective cross‐sectional study was to identify the relative contribution of restorative treatments to tooth loss. The study reviewed records of 826 patients (1102 teeth). Patient's gender, age and education were obtained. In addition to the main reason for extraction (caries, periodontal disease, pre‐prosthetic extraction, restorative failure and remaining root), the following information was collected about each extracted tooth: type, the status of caries if any (primary or secondary) and pulpal status (normal or reversible pulpitis, irreversible pulpitis, necrotic or root canal treated) and type and size of restoration, if present. Following data collection, descriptive analysis was performed. A log‐linear model was used to examine the association between restorative treatment and tooth loss and between reasons for tooth loss and type of tooth. Lower molars followed by upper molars were the most commonly extracted teeth. Teeth with no restorations or with crowns were less likely to be extracted (P < 0·001). Lower and upper molars and lower premolars were more likely to be extracted due to restorative failure, while lower anterior teeth were more likely to be extracted due to periodontal disease (P < 0·05). Twenty two per cent of the extractions was due to restorative failure, and at least 65·9% of these teeth had secondary caries. Gender, age and educational level were factors that affect tooth loss. In conclusion, teeth receiving multiple restorative therapies were more likely to be extracted.</abstract><subject><genre>keywords</genre><topic>dentistry</topic><topic>restorative</topic><topic>tooth extraction</topic><topic>cross‐sectional</topic><topic>reasons</topic><topic>teaching hospital</topic></subject><relatedItem type="host"><titleInfo><title>Journal of Oral Rehabilitation</title></titleInfo><titleInfo type="abbreviated"><title>J Oral Rehabil</title></titleInfo><genre type="journal" authority="ISTEX" authorityURI="https://publication-type.data.istex.fr" valueURI="https://publication-type.data.istex.fr/ark:/67375/JMC-0GLKJH51-B">journal</genre><subject><genre>article-category</genre><topic>Original Article</topic></subject><identifier type="ISSN">0305-182X</identifier><identifier type="eISSN">1365-2842</identifier><identifier type="DOI">10.1111/(ISSN)1365-2842</identifier><identifier type="PublisherID">JOOR</identifier><part><date>2013</date><detail type="volume"><caption>vol.</caption><number>40</number></detail><detail type="issue"><caption>no.</caption><number>6</number></detail><extent unit="pages"><start>464</start><end>471</end><total>8</total></extent></part></relatedItem><identifier type="istex">FA4D6E5227AC963A5C5424D898B559BBCEA3B96A</identifier><identifier type="ark">ark:/67375/WNG-T4WSFGRJ-2</identifier><identifier type="DOI">10.1111/joor.12056</identifier><identifier type="ArticleID">JOOR12056</identifier><accessCondition type="use and reproduction" contentType="copyright">Copyright © 2013 John Wiley & Sons Ltd© 2013 John Wiley & Sons Ltd</accessCondition><recordInfo><recordContentSource authority="ISTEX" authorityURI="https://loaded-corpus.data.istex.fr" valueURI="https://loaded-corpus.data.istex.fr/ark:/67375/XBH-L0C46X92-X">wiley</recordContentSource></recordInfo></mods><json:item><extension>json</extension><original>false</original><mimetype>application/json</mimetype><uri>https://api.istex.fr/document/FA4D6E5227AC963A5C5424D898B559BBCEA3B96A/metadata/json</uri></json:item></metadata><serie></serie></istex></record>Pour manipuler ce document sous Unix (Dilib)
EXPLOR_STEP=$WICRI_ROOT/Wicri/Santé/explor/EdenteV2/Data/Istex/Corpus
HfdSelect -h $EXPLOR_STEP/biblio.hfd -nk 007B91 | SxmlIndent | more
Ou
HfdSelect -h $EXPLOR_AREA/Data/Istex/Corpus/biblio.hfd -nk 007B91 | SxmlIndent | more
Pour mettre un lien sur cette page dans le réseau Wicri
{{Explor lien
|wiki= Wicri/Santé
|area= EdenteV2
|flux= Istex
|étape= Corpus
|type= RBID
|clé= ISTEX:FA4D6E5227AC963A5C5424D898B559BBCEA3B96A
|texte= Relative contribution of restorative treatment to tooth extraction in a teaching institution
}}
| This area was generated with Dilib version V0.6.32. |  |