The microbiota of osseointegrated implants in patients with a history of periodontal disease
Identifieur interne : 007B28 ( Istex/Corpus ); précédent : 007B27; suivant : 007B29The microbiota of osseointegrated implants in patients with a history of periodontal disease
Auteurs : Andrea Mombelli ; Michael Marxer ; Thomas Gaberthüel ; Ueli Grander ; Niklaus P. LangSource :
- Journal of Clinical Periodontology [ 0303-6979 ] ; 1995-02.
English descriptors
- KwdEn :
- Abutment, Abutment connection, Actinobacillus actinomycetemcomitans, Actinomycetemcomitans, Apres, Bacterial counts, Branemark, Chez, Clinical microbiology, Colony morphology, Dental implants, Dental sites, Distal tooth, Echantillons apres, Edentulous, Edentulous patients, Esculin hydrolysis, Etsa, Etsa piates, First molar, Fusobacterium, Gingivalis, Gingivalis selenomonas, Impiants, Implant, Implant samples, Implants research, Important source, Intermedia, Lang, Maximum values, Melaninogenica group, Mesial aspect, Microbiological samples, Microbiology, Microscopic evidence, Mois, Mombelli, Mombelli lang, Monaten, Monaten waren, Nach, Nitrate reduction, Oral environment, Oral microbiology, Osseointegrated, Osseointegrated implants, Osseointegrated titanium implants, Patienten, Patients apres, Periodontai patients, Periodontal, Periodontal disease, Periodontal pathogens, Periodontal pockets, Periodontal research, Periodontal tissues, Plaque, Plaque ilora, Plaque index, Positive periimplant samples, Positive samples, Present study, Quadrant, Quirynen listgarten, Rectus, Selective medium, Spirochete, Subgingival samples, Syed, Target organisms, Time point.
- Teeft :
- Abutment, Abutment connection, Actinobacillus actinomycetemcomitans, Actinomycetemcomitans, Apres, Bacterial counts, Branemark, Chez, Clinical microbiology, Colony morphology, Dental implants, Dental sites, Distal tooth, Echantillons apres, Edentulous, Edentulous patients, Esculin hydrolysis, Etsa, Etsa piates, First molar, Fusobacterium, Gingivalis, Gingivalis selenomonas, Impiants, Implant, Implant samples, Implants research, Important source, Intermedia, Lang, Maximum values, Melaninogenica group, Mesial aspect, Microbiological samples, Microbiology, Microscopic evidence, Mois, Mombelli, Mombelli lang, Monaten, Monaten waren, Nach, Nitrate reduction, Oral environment, Oral microbiology, Osseointegrated, Osseointegrated implants, Osseointegrated titanium implants, Patienten, Patients apres, Periodontai patients, Periodontal, Periodontal disease, Periodontal pathogens, Periodontal pockets, Periodontal research, Periodontal tissues, Plaque, Plaque ilora, Plaque index, Positive periimplant samples, Positive samples, Present study, Quadrant, Quirynen listgarten, Rectus, Selective medium, Spirochete, Subgingival samples, Syed, Target organisms, Time point.
Abstract
Abstract The purpose of this study was to determine the presence of suspected periodontal pathogens in the peri‐implant microflora of osseointegrated implants exposed 3 and 6 months to the oral environment of patients previously treated for periodontal disease. Subgingival microbial samples were taken in the deepest residual pocket of each quadrant in 10 patients before placement of ITI implants and in 10 patients before abutment connection of Brånemark implants. The samples were cultured using continuous anaerobic techniques. 4 patients were positive for P. gingivalis, 13 for P. intermedia, 2 for A. actinomycetemcomitans, 16 for Fusobacterium, 1 for C rectus and 12 showed microscopic evidence of spirochetes. After 3 and 6 months exposure of the implants to the oral environment, one sample was obtained from the peri‐implant sulcus in each patient. P. gingivalis was found in 2 patients in the peri‐implant samples after 3 and 6 months. 6 peri‐implant samples were positive for P. intermedia after 3 months, 7 after 6 months. Fusobacterium was present in 13 peri‐implant samples after 3, and in 12 samples after 6 months. 4 patients showed evidence of for C rectus after 3 months, 2 after 6 months. Spirochetes were seen in 3 peri‐implant samples after 3 and in 5 after 6 months. None of the implants were found to be colonized by A. actinomycetemcomitans, although the organism was detected on teeth in 1 individual. Similar distribution patterns were noted for ITI and BrÅnemark type implants. In comparison to fully edentulous and periodontally healthy individuals, the patients of this study showed a high peri‐implant prevalence of anaerobic putative periodontal pathogens 3 to 6 months after exposure of the implants to the oral environment.
Url:
DOI: 10.1111/j.1600-051X.1995.tb00123.x
Links to Exploration step
ISTEX:F8E0E835C61D5A1794FA9957AC468D688CE7C0A2Le document en format XML
<record><TEI wicri:istexFullTextTei="biblStruct"><teiHeader><fileDesc><titleStmt><title xml:lang="en">The microbiota of osseointegrated implants in patients with a history of periodontal disease</title><author><name sortKey="Mombelli, Andrea" sort="Mombelli, Andrea" uniqKey="Mombelli A" first="Andrea" last="Mombelli">Andrea Mombelli</name><affiliation><mods:affiliation>School of Dental Medicine, University of Bern, Switzerland</mods:affiliation></affiliation><affiliation><mods:affiliation>Correspondence address: A. Mombelli, University of Bern, School of Dental Medicine, Freiburgstrasse 7, CH‐3010 Bern, Switzerland</mods:affiliation></affiliation></author><author><name sortKey="Marxer, Michael" sort="Marxer, Michael" uniqKey="Marxer M" first="Michael" last="Marxer">Michael Marxer</name><affiliation><mods:affiliation>School of Dental Medicine, University of Bern, Switzerland</mods:affiliation></affiliation></author><author><name sortKey="Gaberthuel, Thomas" sort="Gaberthuel, Thomas" uniqKey="Gaberthuel T" first="Thomas" last="Gaberthüel">Thomas Gaberthüel</name><affiliation><mods:affiliation>School of Dental Medicine, University of Bern, Switzerland</mods:affiliation></affiliation></author><author><name sortKey="Grander, Ueli" sort="Grander, Ueli" uniqKey="Grander U" first="Ueli" last="Grander">Ueli Grander</name><affiliation><mods:affiliation>School of Dental Medicine, University of Bern, Switzerland</mods:affiliation></affiliation></author><author><name sortKey="Lang, Niklaus P" sort="Lang, Niklaus P" uniqKey="Lang N" first="Niklaus P." last="Lang">Niklaus P. Lang</name><affiliation><mods:affiliation>School of Dental Medicine, University of Bern, Switzerland</mods:affiliation></affiliation></author></titleStmt><publicationStmt><idno type="wicri:source">ISTEX</idno><idno type="RBID">ISTEX:F8E0E835C61D5A1794FA9957AC468D688CE7C0A2</idno><date when="1995" year="1995">1995</date><idno type="doi">10.1111/j.1600-051X.1995.tb00123.x</idno><idno type="url">https://api.istex.fr/document/F8E0E835C61D5A1794FA9957AC468D688CE7C0A2/fulltext/pdf</idno><idno type="wicri:Area/Istex/Corpus">007B28</idno><idno type="wicri:explorRef" wicri:stream="Istex" wicri:step="Corpus" wicri:corpus="ISTEX">007B28</idno></publicationStmt><sourceDesc><biblStruct><analytic><title level="a" type="main">The microbiota of osseointegrated implants in patients with a history of periodontal disease</title><author><name sortKey="Mombelli, Andrea" sort="Mombelli, Andrea" uniqKey="Mombelli A" first="Andrea" last="Mombelli">Andrea Mombelli</name><affiliation><mods:affiliation>School of Dental Medicine, University of Bern, Switzerland</mods:affiliation></affiliation><affiliation><mods:affiliation>Correspondence address: A. Mombelli, University of Bern, School of Dental Medicine, Freiburgstrasse 7, CH‐3010 Bern, Switzerland</mods:affiliation></affiliation></author><author><name sortKey="Marxer, Michael" sort="Marxer, Michael" uniqKey="Marxer M" first="Michael" last="Marxer">Michael Marxer</name><affiliation><mods:affiliation>School of Dental Medicine, University of Bern, Switzerland</mods:affiliation></affiliation></author><author><name sortKey="Gaberthuel, Thomas" sort="Gaberthuel, Thomas" uniqKey="Gaberthuel T" first="Thomas" last="Gaberthüel">Thomas Gaberthüel</name><affiliation><mods:affiliation>School of Dental Medicine, University of Bern, Switzerland</mods:affiliation></affiliation></author><author><name sortKey="Grander, Ueli" sort="Grander, Ueli" uniqKey="Grander U" first="Ueli" last="Grander">Ueli Grander</name><affiliation><mods:affiliation>School of Dental Medicine, University of Bern, Switzerland</mods:affiliation></affiliation></author><author><name sortKey="Lang, Niklaus P" sort="Lang, Niklaus P" uniqKey="Lang N" first="Niklaus P." last="Lang">Niklaus P. Lang</name><affiliation><mods:affiliation>School of Dental Medicine, University of Bern, Switzerland</mods:affiliation></affiliation></author></analytic><monogr></monogr><series><title level="j" type="main">Journal of Clinical Periodontology</title><title level="j" type="alt">JOURNAL OF CLINICAL PERIODONTOLOGY</title><idno type="ISSN">0303-6979</idno><idno type="eISSN">1600-051X</idno><imprint><biblScope unit="vol">22</biblScope><biblScope unit="issue">2</biblScope><biblScope unit="page" from="124">124</biblScope><biblScope unit="page" to="130">130</biblScope><biblScope unit="page-count">7</biblScope><publisher>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</publisher><pubPlace>Oxford, UK</pubPlace><date type="published" when="1995-02">1995-02</date></imprint><idno type="ISSN">0303-6979</idno></series></biblStruct></sourceDesc><seriesStmt><idno type="ISSN">0303-6979</idno></seriesStmt></fileDesc><profileDesc><textClass><keywords scheme="KwdEn" xml:lang="en"><term>Abutment</term><term>Abutment connection</term><term>Actinobacillus actinomycetemcomitans</term><term>Actinomycetemcomitans</term><term>Apres</term><term>Bacterial counts</term><term>Branemark</term><term>Chez</term><term>Clinical microbiology</term><term>Colony morphology</term><term>Dental implants</term><term>Dental sites</term><term>Distal tooth</term><term>Echantillons apres</term><term>Edentulous</term><term>Edentulous patients</term><term>Esculin hydrolysis</term><term>Etsa</term><term>Etsa piates</term><term>First molar</term><term>Fusobacterium</term><term>Gingivalis</term><term>Gingivalis selenomonas</term><term>Impiants</term><term>Implant</term><term>Implant samples</term><term>Implants research</term><term>Important source</term><term>Intermedia</term><term>Lang</term><term>Maximum values</term><term>Melaninogenica group</term><term>Mesial aspect</term><term>Microbiological samples</term><term>Microbiology</term><term>Microscopic evidence</term><term>Mois</term><term>Mombelli</term><term>Mombelli lang</term><term>Monaten</term><term>Monaten waren</term><term>Nach</term><term>Nitrate reduction</term><term>Oral environment</term><term>Oral microbiology</term><term>Osseointegrated</term><term>Osseointegrated implants</term><term>Osseointegrated titanium implants</term><term>Patienten</term><term>Patients apres</term><term>Periodontai patients</term><term>Periodontal</term><term>Periodontal disease</term><term>Periodontal pathogens</term><term>Periodontal pockets</term><term>Periodontal research</term><term>Periodontal tissues</term><term>Plaque</term><term>Plaque ilora</term><term>Plaque index</term><term>Positive periimplant samples</term><term>Positive samples</term><term>Present study</term><term>Quadrant</term><term>Quirynen listgarten</term><term>Rectus</term><term>Selective medium</term><term>Spirochete</term><term>Subgingival samples</term><term>Syed</term><term>Target organisms</term><term>Time point</term></keywords><keywords scheme="Teeft" xml:lang="en"><term>Abutment</term><term>Abutment connection</term><term>Actinobacillus actinomycetemcomitans</term><term>Actinomycetemcomitans</term><term>Apres</term><term>Bacterial counts</term><term>Branemark</term><term>Chez</term><term>Clinical microbiology</term><term>Colony morphology</term><term>Dental implants</term><term>Dental sites</term><term>Distal tooth</term><term>Echantillons apres</term><term>Edentulous</term><term>Edentulous patients</term><term>Esculin hydrolysis</term><term>Etsa</term><term>Etsa piates</term><term>First molar</term><term>Fusobacterium</term><term>Gingivalis</term><term>Gingivalis selenomonas</term><term>Impiants</term><term>Implant</term><term>Implant samples</term><term>Implants research</term><term>Important source</term><term>Intermedia</term><term>Lang</term><term>Maximum values</term><term>Melaninogenica group</term><term>Mesial aspect</term><term>Microbiological samples</term><term>Microbiology</term><term>Microscopic evidence</term><term>Mois</term><term>Mombelli</term><term>Mombelli lang</term><term>Monaten</term><term>Monaten waren</term><term>Nach</term><term>Nitrate reduction</term><term>Oral environment</term><term>Oral microbiology</term><term>Osseointegrated</term><term>Osseointegrated implants</term><term>Osseointegrated titanium implants</term><term>Patienten</term><term>Patients apres</term><term>Periodontai patients</term><term>Periodontal</term><term>Periodontal disease</term><term>Periodontal pathogens</term><term>Periodontal pockets</term><term>Periodontal research</term><term>Periodontal tissues</term><term>Plaque</term><term>Plaque ilora</term><term>Plaque index</term><term>Positive periimplant samples</term><term>Positive samples</term><term>Present study</term><term>Quadrant</term><term>Quirynen listgarten</term><term>Rectus</term><term>Selective medium</term><term>Spirochete</term><term>Subgingival samples</term><term>Syed</term><term>Target organisms</term><term>Time point</term></keywords></textClass></profileDesc></teiHeader><front><div type="abstract">Abstract The purpose of this study was to determine the presence of suspected periodontal pathogens in the peri‐implant microflora of osseointegrated implants exposed 3 and 6 months to the oral environment of patients previously treated for periodontal disease. Subgingival microbial samples were taken in the deepest residual pocket of each quadrant in 10 patients before placement of ITI implants and in 10 patients before abutment connection of Brånemark implants. The samples were cultured using continuous anaerobic techniques. 4 patients were positive for P. gingivalis, 13 for P. intermedia, 2 for A. actinomycetemcomitans, 16 for Fusobacterium, 1 for C rectus and 12 showed microscopic evidence of spirochetes. After 3 and 6 months exposure of the implants to the oral environment, one sample was obtained from the peri‐implant sulcus in each patient. P. gingivalis was found in 2 patients in the peri‐implant samples after 3 and 6 months. 6 peri‐implant samples were positive for P. intermedia after 3 months, 7 after 6 months. Fusobacterium was present in 13 peri‐implant samples after 3, and in 12 samples after 6 months. 4 patients showed evidence of for C rectus after 3 months, 2 after 6 months. Spirochetes were seen in 3 peri‐implant samples after 3 and in 5 after 6 months. None of the implants were found to be colonized by A. actinomycetemcomitans, although the organism was detected on teeth in 1 individual. Similar distribution patterns were noted for ITI and BrÅnemark type implants. In comparison to fully edentulous and periodontally healthy individuals, the patients of this study showed a high peri‐implant prevalence of anaerobic putative periodontal pathogens 3 to 6 months after exposure of the implants to the oral environment.</div></front></TEI><istex><corpusName>wiley</corpusName><keywords><teeft><json:string>implant</json:string><json:string>periodontal</json:string><json:string>mombelli</json:string><json:string>gingivalis</json:string><json:string>intermedia</json:string><json:string>spirochete</json:string><json:string>mois</json:string><json:string>apres</json:string><json:string>fusobacterium</json:string><json:string>rectus</json:string><json:string>periodontal disease</json:string><json:string>patienten</json:string><json:string>impiants</json:string><json:string>microbiology</json:string><json:string>monaten</json:string><json:string>nach</json:string><json:string>quadrant</json:string><json:string>syed</json:string><json:string>osseointegrated</json:string><json:string>actinomycetemcomitans</json:string><json:string>etsa</json:string><json:string>branemark</json:string><json:string>chez</json:string><json:string>edentulous patients</json:string><json:string>abutment</json:string><json:string>oral environment</json:string><json:string>edentulous</json:string><json:string>abutment connection</json:string><json:string>lang</json:string><json:string>present study</json:string><json:string>mesial aspect</json:string><json:string>plaque index</json:string><json:string>periodontal pathogens</json:string><json:string>osseointegrated implants</json:string><json:string>clinical microbiology</json:string><json:string>esculin hydrolysis</json:string><json:string>periodontai patients</json:string><json:string>nitrate reduction</json:string><json:string>melaninogenica group</json:string><json:string>dental sites</json:string><json:string>implants research</json:string><json:string>positive samples</json:string><json:string>implant samples</json:string><json:string>osseointegrated titanium implants</json:string><json:string>plaque</json:string><json:string>colony morphology</json:string><json:string>etsa piates</json:string><json:string>positive periimplant samples</json:string><json:string>quirynen listgarten</json:string><json:string>first molar</json:string><json:string>target organisms</json:string><json:string>distal tooth</json:string><json:string>plaque ilora</json:string><json:string>bacterial counts</json:string><json:string>periodontal tissues</json:string><json:string>microscopic evidence</json:string><json:string>maximum values</json:string><json:string>periodontal pockets</json:string><json:string>gingivalis selenomonas</json:string><json:string>patients apres</json:string><json:string>echantillons apres</json:string><json:string>important source</json:string><json:string>subgingival samples</json:string><json:string>monaten waren</json:string><json:string>microbiological samples</json:string><json:string>time point</json:string><json:string>mombelli lang</json:string><json:string>oral microbiology</json:string><json:string>dental implants</json:string><json:string>periodontal research</json:string><json:string>selective medium</json:string><json:string>actinobacillus actinomycetemcomitans</json:string></teeft></keywords><author><json:item><name>Andrea Mombelli</name><affiliations><json:string>School of Dental Medicine, University of Bern, Switzerland</json:string><json:string>Correspondence address: A. Mombelli, University of Bern, School of Dental Medicine, Freiburgstrasse 7, CH‐3010 Bern, Switzerland</json:string></affiliations></json:item><json:item><name>Michael Marxer</name><affiliations><json:string>School of Dental Medicine, University of Bern, Switzerland</json:string></affiliations></json:item><json:item><name>Thomas Gaberthüel</name><affiliations><json:string>School of Dental Medicine, University of Bern, Switzerland</json:string></affiliations></json:item><json:item><name>Ueli Grander</name><affiliations><json:string>School of Dental Medicine, University of Bern, Switzerland</json:string></affiliations></json:item><json:item><name>Niklaus P. Lang</name><affiliations><json:string>School of Dental Medicine, University of Bern, Switzerland</json:string></affiliations></json:item></author><subject><json:item><lang><json:string>eng</json:string></lang><value>titanium‐implants</value></json:item><json:item><lang><json:string>eng</json:string></lang><value>microbiology</value></json:item><json:item><lang><json:string>eng</json:string></lang><value>periodontal disease</value></json:item></subject><articleId><json:string>JCPE124</json:string></articleId><arkIstex>ark:/67375/WNG-S2JX7JLD-C</arkIstex><language><json:string>eng</json:string></language><originalGenre><json:string>article</json:string></originalGenre><abstract>Abstract The purpose of this study was to determine the presence of suspected periodontal pathogens in the peri‐implant microflora of osseointegrated implants exposed 3 and 6 months to the oral environment of patients previously treated for periodontal disease. Subgingival microbial samples were taken in the deepest residual pocket of each quadrant in 10 patients before placement of ITI implants and in 10 patients before abutment connection of Brånemark implants. The samples were cultured using continuous anaerobic techniques. 4 patients were positive for P. gingivalis, 13 for P. intermedia, 2 for A. actinomycetemcomitans, 16 for Fusobacterium, 1 for C rectus and 12 showed microscopic evidence of spirochetes. After 3 and 6 months exposure of the implants to the oral environment, one sample was obtained from the peri‐implant sulcus in each patient. P. gingivalis was found in 2 patients in the peri‐implant samples after 3 and 6 months. 6 peri‐implant samples were positive for P. intermedia after 3 months, 7 after 6 months. Fusobacterium was present in 13 peri‐implant samples after 3, and in 12 samples after 6 months. 4 patients showed evidence of for C rectus after 3 months, 2 after 6 months. Spirochetes were seen in 3 peri‐implant samples after 3 and in 5 after 6 months. None of the implants were found to be colonized by A. actinomycetemcomitans, although the organism was detected on teeth in 1 individual. Similar distribution patterns were noted for ITI and BrÅnemark type implants. In comparison to fully edentulous and periodontally healthy individuals, the patients of this study showed a high peri‐implant prevalence of anaerobic putative periodontal pathogens 3 to 6 months after exposure of the implants to the oral environment.</abstract><qualityIndicators><score>9.1</score><pdfWordCount>4100</pdfWordCount><pdfCharCount>27804</pdfCharCount><pdfVersion>1.4</pdfVersion><pdfPageCount>8</pdfPageCount><pdfPageSize>731 x 990 pts</pdfPageSize><refBibsNative>true</refBibsNative><abstractWordCount>277</abstractWordCount><abstractCharCount>1758</abstractCharCount><keywordCount>3</keywordCount></qualityIndicators><title>The microbiota of osseointegrated implants in patients with a history of periodontal disease</title><genre><json:string>article</json:string></genre><host><title>Journal of Clinical Periodontology</title><language><json:string>unknown</json:string></language><doi><json:string>10.1111/(ISSN)1600-051X</json:string></doi><issn><json:string>0303-6979</json:string></issn><eissn><json:string>1600-051X</json:string></eissn><publisherId><json:string>JCPE</json:string></publisherId><volume>22</volume><issue>2</issue><pages><first>124</first><last>130</last><total>7</total></pages><genre><json:string>journal</json:string></genre></host><namedEntities><unitex><date><json:string>1995</json:string></date><geogName></geogName><orgName><json:string>CO CO Q CO CO O CO</json:string><json:string>Coy Laboratory Products Inc</json:string><json:string>Spiral Systems Inc.</json:string><json:string>Switzerland Mombelli A, Marxer</json:string><json:string>O CO CO</json:string><json:string>CO CO O CO CO</json:string><json:string>University of Bern, Switzerland</json:string></orgName><orgName_funder></orgName_funder><orgName_provider></orgName_provider><persName><json:string>Michael Marxer</json:string><json:string>Ann Arbor</json:string><json:string>Thomas GaberthiJel</json:string><json:string>I. Frequency</json:string><json:string>Marianne Weibel</json:string><json:string>Reguia</json:string></persName><placeName><json:string>Cincinnatti</json:string><json:string>USA</json:string><json:string>OH</json:string></placeName><ref_url></ref_url><ref_bibl><json:string>Laughon et al. 1982a</json:string><json:string>Mombeili et al. 1988</json:string><json:string>Syed & Loesche 1972</json:string><json:string>Syed et al. 1980</json:string><json:string>Socransky et al. 1982</json:string><json:string>Slots 1982</json:string><json:string>Zyiber & Jordan 1982</json:string><json:string>Mombelli & Lang 1994</json:string><json:string>Mombelli et al.</json:string><json:string>Listgarten (1990)</json:string><json:string>Mombelli et al. 1991</json:string><json:string>Mombelh et al. 1987</json:string><json:string>Gusberti & Syed 1984</json:string><json:string>Leonhardt et al. (1993)</json:string><json:string>Apse et al. (1989)</json:string><json:string>Silness & Loe 1964</json:string><json:string>Qadri et al. 1980</json:string></ref_bibl><bibl></bibl></unitex></namedEntities><ark><json:string>ark:/67375/WNG-S2JX7JLD-C</json:string></ark><categories><wos><json:string>1 - science</json:string><json:string>2 - dentistry, oral surgery & medicine</json:string></wos><scienceMetrix><json:string>1 - health sciences</json:string><json:string>2 - clinical medicine</json:string><json:string>3 - dentistry</json:string></scienceMetrix><scopus><json:string>1 - Health Sciences</json:string><json:string>2 - Dentistry</json:string><json:string>3 - Periodontics</json:string></scopus></categories><publicationDate>1995</publicationDate><copyrightDate>1995</copyrightDate><doi><json:string>10.1111/j.1600-051X.1995.tb00123.x</json:string></doi><id>F8E0E835C61D5A1794FA9957AC468D688CE7C0A2</id><score>1</score><fulltext><json:item><extension>pdf</extension><original>true</original><mimetype>application/pdf</mimetype><uri>https://api.istex.fr/document/F8E0E835C61D5A1794FA9957AC468D688CE7C0A2/fulltext/pdf</uri></json:item><json:item><extension>zip</extension><original>false</original><mimetype>application/zip</mimetype><uri>https://api.istex.fr/document/F8E0E835C61D5A1794FA9957AC468D688CE7C0A2/fulltext/zip</uri></json:item><istex:fulltextTEI uri="https://api.istex.fr/document/F8E0E835C61D5A1794FA9957AC468D688CE7C0A2/fulltext/tei"><teiHeader><fileDesc><titleStmt><title level="a" type="main">The microbiota of osseointegrated implants in patients with a history of periodontal disease</title></titleStmt><publicationStmt><authority>ISTEX</authority><publisher>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</publisher><pubPlace>Oxford, UK</pubPlace><date type="published" when="1995-02"></date></publicationStmt><notesStmt><note type="content-type" subtype="article" source="article" scheme="https://content-type.data.istex.fr/ark:/67375/XTP-6N5SZHKN-D">article</note><note type="publication-type" subtype="journal" scheme="https://publication-type.data.istex.fr/ark:/67375/JMC-0GLKJH51-B">journal</note></notesStmt><sourceDesc><biblStruct type="article"><analytic><title level="a" type="main">The microbiota of osseointegrated implants in patients with a history of periodontal disease</title><author xml:id="author-0000" role="corresp"><persName><forename type="first">Andrea</forename><surname>Mombelli</surname></persName><affiliation>School of Dental Medicine, University of Bern, Switzerland<address><country key="CH"></country></address></affiliation><affiliation>A. Mombelli, University of Bern, School of Dental Medicine, Freiburgstrasse 7, CH‐3010 Bern, Switzerland</affiliation></author><author xml:id="author-0001"><persName><forename type="first">Michael</forename><surname>Marxer</surname></persName><affiliation>School of Dental Medicine, University of Bern, Switzerland<address><country key="CH"></country></address></affiliation></author><author xml:id="author-0002"><persName><forename type="first">Thomas</forename><surname>Gaberthüel</surname></persName><affiliation>School of Dental Medicine, University of Bern, Switzerland<address><country key="CH"></country></address></affiliation></author><author xml:id="author-0003"><persName><forename type="first">Ueli</forename><surname>Grander</surname></persName><affiliation>School of Dental Medicine, University of Bern, Switzerland<address><country key="CH"></country></address></affiliation></author><author xml:id="author-0004"><persName><forename type="first">Niklaus P.</forename><surname>Lang</surname></persName><affiliation>School of Dental Medicine, University of Bern, Switzerland<address><country key="CH"></country></address></affiliation></author><idno type="istex">F8E0E835C61D5A1794FA9957AC468D688CE7C0A2</idno><idno type="ark">ark:/67375/WNG-S2JX7JLD-C</idno><idno type="DOI">10.1111/j.1600-051X.1995.tb00123.x</idno><idno type="unit">JCPE124</idno><idno type="toTypesetVersion">file:JCPE.JCPE124.pdf</idno></analytic><monogr><title level="j" type="main">Journal of Clinical Periodontology</title><title level="j" type="alt">JOURNAL OF CLINICAL PERIODONTOLOGY</title><idno type="pISSN">0303-6979</idno><idno type="eISSN">1600-051X</idno><idno type="book-DOI">10.1111/(ISSN)1600-051X</idno><idno type="book-part-DOI">10.1111/cpe.1995.22.issue-2</idno><idno type="product">JCPE</idno><idno type="publisherDivision">ST</idno><imprint><biblScope unit="vol">22</biblScope><biblScope unit="issue">2</biblScope><biblScope unit="page" from="124">124</biblScope><biblScope unit="page" to="130">130</biblScope><biblScope unit="page-count">7</biblScope><publisher>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</publisher><pubPlace>Oxford, UK</pubPlace><date type="published" when="1995-02"></date></imprint></monogr></biblStruct></sourceDesc></fileDesc><profileDesc><abstract xml:lang="en" style="main"><p><hi rend="bold">Abstract</hi> The purpose of this study was to determine the presence of suspected periodontal pathogens in the peri‐implant microflora of osseointegrated implants exposed 3 and 6 months to the oral environment of patients previously treated for periodontal disease. Subgingival microbial samples were taken in the deepest residual pocket of each quadrant in 10 patients before placement of ITI implants and in 10 patients before abutment connection of Brånemark implants. The samples were cultured using continuous anaerobic techniques. 4 patients were positive for <hi rend="italic">P. gingivalis</hi>, 13 for <hi rend="italic">P. intermedia</hi>, 2 for <hi rend="italic">A. actinomycetemcomitans</hi>, 16 for <hi rend="italic">Fusobacterium</hi>, 1 for <hi rend="italic">C rectus</hi> and 12 showed microscopic evidence of spirochetes. After 3 and 6 months exposure of the implants to the oral environment, one sample was obtained from the peri‐implant sulcus in each patient. <hi rend="italic">P. gingivalis</hi> was found in 2 patients in the peri‐implant samples after 3 and 6 months. 6 peri‐implant samples were positive for <hi rend="italic">P. intermedia</hi> after 3 months, 7 after 6 months. <hi rend="italic">Fusobacterium</hi> was present in 13 peri‐implant samples after 3, and in 12 samples after 6 months. 4 patients showed evidence of for C rectus after 3 months, 2 after 6 months. Spirochetes were seen in 3 peri‐implant samples after 3 and in 5 after 6 months. None of the implants were found to be colonized by <hi rend="italic">A. actinomycetemcomitans</hi>, although the organism was detected on teeth in 1 individual. Similar distribution patterns were noted for ITI and BrÅnemark type implants. In comparison to fully edentulous and periodontally healthy individuals, the patients of this study showed a high peri‐implant prevalence of anaerobic putative periodontal pathogens 3 to 6 months after exposure of the implants to the oral environment.</p></abstract><textClass><keywords xml:lang="en"><term xml:id="k1">titanium‐implants</term><term xml:id="k2">microbiology</term><term xml:id="k3">periodontal disease</term></keywords><keywords rend="tocHeading1"><term>Original Articles</term></keywords></textClass><langUsage><language ident="en"></language></langUsage></profileDesc></teiHeader></istex:fulltextTEI><json:item><extension>txt</extension><original>false</original><mimetype>text/plain</mimetype><uri>https://api.istex.fr/document/F8E0E835C61D5A1794FA9957AC468D688CE7C0A2/fulltext/txt</uri></json:item></fulltext><metadata><istex:metadataXml wicri:clean="Wiley, elements deleted: body"><istex:xmlDeclaration>version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" standalone="yes"</istex:xmlDeclaration><istex:document><component version="2.0" type="serialArticle" xml:lang="en"><header><publicationMeta level="product"><publisherInfo><publisherName>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</publisherName><publisherLoc>Oxford, UK</publisherLoc></publisherInfo><doi origin="wiley" registered="yes">10.1111/(ISSN)1600-051X</doi><issn type="print">0303-6979</issn><issn type="electronic">1600-051X</issn><idGroup><id type="product" value="JCPE"></id><id type="publisherDivision" value="ST"></id></idGroup><titleGroup><title type="main" sort="JOURNAL OF CLINICAL PERIODONTOLOGY">Journal of Clinical Periodontology</title></titleGroup></publicationMeta><publicationMeta level="part" position="02002"><doi origin="wiley">10.1111/cpe.1995.22.issue-2</doi><numberingGroup><numbering type="journalVolume" number="22">22</numbering><numbering type="journalIssue" number="2">2</numbering></numberingGroup><coverDate startDate="1995-02">February 1995</coverDate></publicationMeta><publicationMeta level="unit" type="article" position="0012400" status="forIssue"><doi origin="wiley">10.1111/j.1600-051X.1995.tb00123.x</doi><idGroup><id type="unit" value="JCPE124"></id></idGroup><countGroup><count type="pageTotal" number="7"></count></countGroup><titleGroup><title type="tocHeading1">Original Articles</title></titleGroup><eventGroup><event type="firstOnline" date="2005-12-13"></event><event type="publishedOnlineFinalForm" date="2005-12-13"></event><event type="xmlConverted" agent="Converter:BPG_TO_WML3G version:2.3.2 mode:FullText source:HeaderRef result:HeaderRef" date="2010-03-09"></event><event type="xmlConverted" agent="Converter:WILEY_ML3G_TO_WILEY_ML3GV2 version:4.0.1" date="2014-03-19"></event><event type="xmlConverted" agent="Converter:WML3G_To_WML3G version:4.1.7 mode:FullText,remove_FC" date="2014-10-23"></event></eventGroup><numberingGroup><numbering type="pageFirst" number="124">124</numbering><numbering type="pageLast" number="130">130</numbering></numberingGroup><correspondenceTo>A. Mombelli, University of Bern, School of Dental Medicine, Freiburgstrasse 7, CH‐3010 Bern, Switzerland</correspondenceTo><linkGroup><link type="toTypesetVersion" href="file:JCPE.JCPE124.pdf"></link></linkGroup></publicationMeta><contentMeta><unparsedEditorialHistory>Accepted for publication 1 February 1994</unparsedEditorialHistory><countGroup><count type="referenceTotal" number="21"></count><count type="linksCrossRef" number="6"></count></countGroup><titleGroup><title type="main">The microbiota of osseointegrated implants in patients with a history of periodontal disease</title></titleGroup><creators><creator creatorRole="author" xml:id="cr1" affiliationRef="#a1" corresponding="yes"><personName><givenNames>Andrea</givenNames><familyName>Mombelli</familyName></personName></creator><creator creatorRole="author" xml:id="cr2" affiliationRef="#a1"><personName><givenNames>Michael</givenNames><familyName>Marxer</familyName></personName></creator><creator creatorRole="author" xml:id="cr3" affiliationRef="#a1"><personName><givenNames>Thomas</givenNames><familyName>Gaberthüel</familyName></personName></creator><creator creatorRole="author" xml:id="cr4" affiliationRef="#a1"><personName><givenNames>Ueli</givenNames><familyName>Grander</familyName></personName></creator><creator creatorRole="author" xml:id="cr5" affiliationRef="#a1"><personName><givenNames>Niklaus P.</givenNames><familyName>Lang</familyName></personName></creator></creators><affiliationGroup><affiliation xml:id="a1" countryCode="CH"><unparsedAffiliation>School of Dental Medicine, University of Bern, Switzerland</unparsedAffiliation></affiliation></affiliationGroup><keywordGroup xml:lang="en"><keyword xml:id="k1">titanium‐implants</keyword><keyword xml:id="k2">microbiology</keyword><keyword xml:id="k3">periodontal disease</keyword></keywordGroup><abstractGroup><abstract type="main" xml:lang="en"><p><b>Abstract</b> The purpose of this study was to determine the presence of suspected periodontal pathogens in the peri‐implant microflora of osseointegrated implants exposed 3 and 6 months to the oral environment of patients previously treated for periodontal disease. Subgingival microbial samples were taken in the deepest residual pocket of each quadrant in 10 patients before placement of ITI implants and in 10 patients before abutment connection of Brånemark implants. The samples were cultured using continuous anaerobic techniques. 4 patients were positive for <i>P. gingivalis</i>, 13 for <i>P. intermedia</i>, 2 for <i>A. actinomycetemcomitans</i>, 16 for <i>Fusobacterium</i>, 1 for <i>C rectus</i> and 12 showed microscopic evidence of spirochetes. After 3 and 6 months exposure of the implants to the oral environment, one sample was obtained from the peri‐implant sulcus in each patient. <i>P. gingivalis</i> was found in 2 patients in the peri‐implant samples after 3 and 6 months. 6 peri‐implant samples were positive for <i>P. intermedia</i> after 3 months, 7 after 6 months. <i>Fusobacterium</i> was present in 13 peri‐implant samples after 3, and in 12 samples after 6 months. 4 patients showed evidence of for C rectus after 3 months, 2 after 6 months. Spirochetes were seen in 3 peri‐implant samples after 3 and in 5 after 6 months. None of the implants were found to be colonized by <i>A. actinomycetemcomitans</i>, although the organism was detected on teeth in 1 individual. Similar distribution patterns were noted for ITI and BrÅnemark type implants. In comparison to fully edentulous and periodontally healthy individuals, the patients of this study showed a high peri‐implant prevalence of anaerobic putative periodontal pathogens 3 to 6 months after exposure of the implants to the oral environment.</p></abstract></abstractGroup></contentMeta></header></component></istex:document></istex:metadataXml><mods version="3.6"><titleInfo lang="en"><title>The microbiota of osseointegrated implants in patients with a history of periodontal disease</title></titleInfo><titleInfo type="alternative" contentType="CDATA" lang="en"><title>The microbiota of osseointegrated implants in patients with a history of periodontal disease</title></titleInfo><name type="personal"><namePart type="given">Andrea</namePart><namePart type="family">Mombelli</namePart><affiliation>School of Dental Medicine, University of Bern, Switzerland</affiliation><affiliation>Correspondence address: A. Mombelli, University of Bern, School of Dental Medicine, Freiburgstrasse 7, CH‐3010 Bern, Switzerland</affiliation><role><roleTerm type="text">author</roleTerm></role></name><name type="personal"><namePart type="given">Michael</namePart><namePart type="family">Marxer</namePart><affiliation>School of Dental Medicine, University of Bern, Switzerland</affiliation><role><roleTerm type="text">author</roleTerm></role></name><name type="personal"><namePart type="given">Thomas</namePart><namePart type="family">Gaberthüel</namePart><affiliation>School of Dental Medicine, University of Bern, Switzerland</affiliation><role><roleTerm type="text">author</roleTerm></role></name><name type="personal"><namePart type="given">Ueli</namePart><namePart type="family">Grander</namePart><affiliation>School of Dental Medicine, University of Bern, Switzerland</affiliation><role><roleTerm type="text">author</roleTerm></role></name><name type="personal"><namePart type="given">Niklaus P.</namePart><namePart type="family">Lang</namePart><affiliation>School of Dental Medicine, University of Bern, Switzerland</affiliation><role><roleTerm type="text">author</roleTerm></role></name><typeOfResource>text</typeOfResource><genre type="article" displayLabel="article" authority="ISTEX" authorityURI="https://content-type.data.istex.fr" valueURI="https://content-type.data.istex.fr/ark:/67375/XTP-6N5SZHKN-D">article</genre><originInfo><publisher>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</publisher><place><placeTerm type="text">Oxford, UK</placeTerm></place><dateIssued encoding="w3cdtf">1995-02</dateIssued><edition>Accepted for publication 1 February 1994</edition><copyrightDate encoding="w3cdtf">1995</copyrightDate></originInfo><language><languageTerm type="code" authority="rfc3066">en</languageTerm><languageTerm type="code" authority="iso639-2b">eng</languageTerm></language><physicalDescription><extent unit="references">21</extent><extent unit="linksCrossRef">6</extent></physicalDescription><abstract>Abstract The purpose of this study was to determine the presence of suspected periodontal pathogens in the peri‐implant microflora of osseointegrated implants exposed 3 and 6 months to the oral environment of patients previously treated for periodontal disease. Subgingival microbial samples were taken in the deepest residual pocket of each quadrant in 10 patients before placement of ITI implants and in 10 patients before abutment connection of Brånemark implants. The samples were cultured using continuous anaerobic techniques. 4 patients were positive for P. gingivalis, 13 for P. intermedia, 2 for A. actinomycetemcomitans, 16 for Fusobacterium, 1 for C rectus and 12 showed microscopic evidence of spirochetes. After 3 and 6 months exposure of the implants to the oral environment, one sample was obtained from the peri‐implant sulcus in each patient. P. gingivalis was found in 2 patients in the peri‐implant samples after 3 and 6 months. 6 peri‐implant samples were positive for P. intermedia after 3 months, 7 after 6 months. Fusobacterium was present in 13 peri‐implant samples after 3, and in 12 samples after 6 months. 4 patients showed evidence of for C rectus after 3 months, 2 after 6 months. Spirochetes were seen in 3 peri‐implant samples after 3 and in 5 after 6 months. None of the implants were found to be colonized by A. actinomycetemcomitans, although the organism was detected on teeth in 1 individual. Similar distribution patterns were noted for ITI and BrÅnemark type implants. In comparison to fully edentulous and periodontally healthy individuals, the patients of this study showed a high peri‐implant prevalence of anaerobic putative periodontal pathogens 3 to 6 months after exposure of the implants to the oral environment.</abstract><subject lang="en"><genre>keywords</genre><topic>titanium‐implants</topic><topic>microbiology</topic><topic>periodontal disease</topic></subject><relatedItem type="host"><titleInfo><title>Journal of Clinical Periodontology</title></titleInfo><genre type="journal" authority="ISTEX" authorityURI="https://publication-type.data.istex.fr" valueURI="https://publication-type.data.istex.fr/ark:/67375/JMC-0GLKJH51-B">journal</genre><identifier type="ISSN">0303-6979</identifier><identifier type="eISSN">1600-051X</identifier><identifier type="DOI">10.1111/(ISSN)1600-051X</identifier><identifier type="PublisherID">JCPE</identifier><part><date>1995</date><detail type="volume"><caption>vol.</caption><number>22</number></detail><detail type="issue"><caption>no.</caption><number>2</number></detail><extent unit="pages"><start>124</start><end>130</end><total>7</total></extent></part></relatedItem><identifier type="istex">F8E0E835C61D5A1794FA9957AC468D688CE7C0A2</identifier><identifier type="ark">ark:/67375/WNG-S2JX7JLD-C</identifier><identifier type="DOI">10.1111/j.1600-051X.1995.tb00123.x</identifier><identifier type="ArticleID">JCPE124</identifier><recordInfo><recordContentSource authority="ISTEX" authorityURI="https://loaded-corpus.data.istex.fr" valueURI="https://loaded-corpus.data.istex.fr/ark:/67375/XBH-L0C46X92-X">wiley</recordContentSource><recordOrigin>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</recordOrigin></recordInfo></mods><json:item><extension>json</extension><original>false</original><mimetype>application/json</mimetype><uri>https://api.istex.fr/document/F8E0E835C61D5A1794FA9957AC468D688CE7C0A2/metadata/json</uri></json:item></metadata><serie></serie></istex></record>Pour manipuler ce document sous Unix (Dilib)
EXPLOR_STEP=$WICRI_ROOT/Wicri/Santé/explor/EdenteV2/Data/Istex/Corpus
HfdSelect -h $EXPLOR_STEP/biblio.hfd -nk 007B28 | SxmlIndent | more
Ou
HfdSelect -h $EXPLOR_AREA/Data/Istex/Corpus/biblio.hfd -nk 007B28 | SxmlIndent | more
Pour mettre un lien sur cette page dans le réseau Wicri
{{Explor lien
|wiki= Wicri/Santé
|area= EdenteV2
|flux= Istex
|étape= Corpus
|type= RBID
|clé= ISTEX:F8E0E835C61D5A1794FA9957AC468D688CE7C0A2
|texte= The microbiota of osseointegrated implants in patients with a history of periodontal disease
}}
| This area was generated with Dilib version V0.6.32. |  |