Registration of localization, occlusion and occluding materials for failing screw joints in the Brånemark implant system
Identifieur interne : 007A45 ( Istex/Corpus ); précédent : 007A44; suivant : 007A46Registration of localization, occlusion and occluding materials for failing screw joints in the Brånemark implant system
Auteurs : H. WieSource :
- Clinical Oral Implants Research [ 0905-7161 ] ; 1995-03.
Abstract
This study is based on data from routine follow‐up registration following functional loading of a consecutive number of osseointegrated prostheses at the Dental School, University of Oslo. Fifty‐six patients with 240 Brånemark implants were examined 24 months after the implants were loaded, and a protocol form for collecting information about the status of the treatment was completed. The examinations included registration of oral hygiene, pathological alterations in soft and hard tissues, type of material used in contacting occlusal surfaces, occlusal design and technical and mechanical failures. All superstructures, except CeraOne single‐tooth prostheses. were unscrewed for inspection of implant and screw joint mobility. Eighty‐three per cent of the implants were found in the upper and lower frontal segments of the jaws. The survival rate for individual implants in this study was 94%. which is well within the generally accepted level for osseointegrated implant systems. Plaque and soft tissue complications were low and could not be associated with the early losses of implants. Group function was the preferred design of the occlusal contact pattern (53.4%), followed by 37% for canine guidance and about 9% for balanced articulation. Fourteen abutment screws and 7 gold screws loosened during the period between permanent loading and the first follow‐up registration. A majority of the failures occurred in osseointegrated bridges occluding with complete dentures in the opposite jaw. The failing screw joints were found in 25% of the patients, which means that one fourth of the patients needed extra mending appointments. The failures are assumed to be iatrogenic, and measures to avoid them are discussed.
Url:
DOI: 10.1034/j.1600-0501.1995.060106.x
Links to Exploration step
ISTEX:F76841918A1038743D6B4F3FB25B975463DC903CLe document en format XML
<record><TEI wicri:istexFullTextTei="biblStruct"><teiHeader><fileDesc><titleStmt><title xml:lang="en">Registration of localization, occlusion and occluding materials for failing screw joints in the Brånemark implant system</title><author><name sortKey="Wie, H" sort="Wie, H" uniqKey="Wie H" first="H." last="Wie">H. Wie</name><affiliation><mods:affiliation>Department of Prosthetic Dentistry and Stomatognathic Physiology, University of Oslo, Norway</mods:affiliation></affiliation></author></titleStmt><publicationStmt><idno type="wicri:source">ISTEX</idno><idno type="RBID">ISTEX:F76841918A1038743D6B4F3FB25B975463DC903C</idno><date when="1995" year="1995">1995</date><idno type="doi">10.1034/j.1600-0501.1995.060106.x</idno><idno type="url">https://api.istex.fr/document/F76841918A1038743D6B4F3FB25B975463DC903C/fulltext/pdf</idno><idno type="wicri:Area/Istex/Corpus">007A45</idno><idno type="wicri:explorRef" wicri:stream="Istex" wicri:step="Corpus" wicri:corpus="ISTEX">007A45</idno></publicationStmt><sourceDesc><biblStruct><analytic><title level="a" type="main">Registration of localization, occlusion and occluding materials for failing screw joints in the Brånemark implant system</title><author><name sortKey="Wie, H" sort="Wie, H" uniqKey="Wie H" first="H." last="Wie">H. Wie</name><affiliation><mods:affiliation>Department of Prosthetic Dentistry and Stomatognathic Physiology, University of Oslo, Norway</mods:affiliation></affiliation></author></analytic><monogr></monogr><series><title level="j" type="main">Clinical Oral Implants Research</title><title level="j" type="alt">CLINICAL ORAL IMPLANTS RESEARCH</title><idno type="ISSN">0905-7161</idno><idno type="eISSN">1600-0501</idno><imprint><biblScope unit="vol">6</biblScope><biblScope unit="issue">1</biblScope><biblScope unit="page" from="47">47</biblScope><biblScope unit="page" to="53">53</biblScope><publisher>Munksgaard International Publishers</publisher><pubPlace>Copenhagen</pubPlace><date type="published" when="1995-03">1995-03</date></imprint><idno type="ISSN">0905-7161</idno></series></biblStruct></sourceDesc><seriesStmt><idno type="ISSN">0905-7161</idno></seriesStmt></fileDesc><profileDesc><textClass></textClass></profileDesc></teiHeader><front><div type="abstract" xml:lang="en">This study is based on data from routine follow‐up registration following functional loading of a consecutive number of osseointegrated prostheses at the Dental School, University of Oslo. Fifty‐six patients with 240 Brånemark implants were examined 24 months after the implants were loaded, and a protocol form for collecting information about the status of the treatment was completed. The examinations included registration of oral hygiene, pathological alterations in soft and hard tissues, type of material used in contacting occlusal surfaces, occlusal design and technical and mechanical failures. All superstructures, except CeraOne single‐tooth prostheses. were unscrewed for inspection of implant and screw joint mobility. Eighty‐three per cent of the implants were found in the upper and lower frontal segments of the jaws. The survival rate for individual implants in this study was 94%. which is well within the generally accepted level for osseointegrated implant systems. Plaque and soft tissue complications were low and could not be associated with the early losses of implants. Group function was the preferred design of the occlusal contact pattern (53.4%), followed by 37% for canine guidance and about 9% for balanced articulation. Fourteen abutment screws and 7 gold screws loosened during the period between permanent loading and the first follow‐up registration. A majority of the failures occurred in osseointegrated bridges occluding with complete dentures in the opposite jaw. The failing screw joints were found in 25% of the patients, which means that one fourth of the patients needed extra mending appointments. The failures are assumed to be iatrogenic, and measures to avoid them are discussed.</div></front></TEI><istex><corpusName>wiley</corpusName><author><json:item><name>H. Wie</name><affiliations><json:string>Department of Prosthetic Dentistry and Stomatognathic Physiology, University of Oslo, Norway</json:string></affiliations></json:item></author><subject><json:item><lang><json:string>eng</json:string></lang><value>Brånemark implant</value></json:item><json:item><lang><json:string>eng</json:string></lang><value>screw joint</value></json:item><json:item><lang><json:string>eng</json:string></lang><value>functional loading</value></json:item><json:item><lang><json:string>eng</json:string></lang><value>failure</value></json:item></subject><articleId><json:string>CLR060106</json:string></articleId><arkIstex>ark:/67375/WNG-98FXTS1X-B</arkIstex><language><json:string>eng</json:string></language><originalGenre><json:string>article</json:string></originalGenre><abstract>This study is based on data from routine follow‐up registration following functional loading of a consecutive number of osseointegrated prostheses at the Dental School, University of Oslo. Fifty‐six patients with 240 Brånemark implants were examined 24 months after the implants were loaded, and a protocol form for collecting information about the status of the treatment was completed. The examinations included registration of oral hygiene, pathological alterations in soft and hard tissues, type of material used in contacting occlusal surfaces, occlusal design and technical and mechanical failures. All superstructures, except CeraOne single‐tooth prostheses. were unscrewed for inspection of implant and screw joint mobility. Eighty‐three per cent of the implants were found in the upper and lower frontal segments of the jaws. The survival rate for individual implants in this study was 94%. which is well within the generally accepted level for osseointegrated implant systems. Plaque and soft tissue complications were low and could not be associated with the early losses of implants. Group function was the preferred design of the occlusal contact pattern (53.4%), followed by 37% for canine guidance and about 9% for balanced articulation. Fourteen abutment screws and 7 gold screws loosened during the period between permanent loading and the first follow‐up registration. A majority of the failures occurred in osseointegrated bridges occluding with complete dentures in the opposite jaw. The failing screw joints were found in 25% of the patients, which means that one fourth of the patients needed extra mending appointments. The failures are assumed to be iatrogenic, and measures to avoid them are discussed.</abstract><qualityIndicators><score>5.05</score><pdfWordCount>0</pdfWordCount><pdfCharCount>0</pdfCharCount><pdfVersion>1.3</pdfVersion><pdfPageCount>7</pdfPageCount><pdfPageSize>558 x 780 pts</pdfPageSize><refBibsNative>false</refBibsNative><abstractWordCount>258</abstractWordCount><abstractCharCount>1727</abstractCharCount><keywordCount>4</keywordCount></qualityIndicators><title>Registration of localization, occlusion and occluding materials for failing screw joints in the Brånemark implant system</title><pmid><json:string>7669867</json:string></pmid><genre><json:string>article</json:string></genre><host><title>Clinical Oral Implants Research</title><language><json:string>unknown</json:string></language><doi><json:string>10.1111/(ISSN)1600-0501</json:string></doi><issn><json:string>0905-7161</json:string></issn><eissn><json:string>1600-0501</json:string></eissn><publisherId><json:string>CLR</json:string></publisherId><volume>6</volume><issue>1</issue><pages><first>47</first><last>53</last></pages><genre><json:string>journal</json:string></genre></host><namedEntities><unitex><date><json:string>1995</json:string></date><geogName></geogName><orgName></orgName><orgName_funder></orgName_funder><orgName_provider></orgName_provider><persName></persName><placeName></placeName><ref_url></ref_url><ref_bibl></ref_bibl><bibl></bibl></unitex></namedEntities><ark><json:string>ark:/67375/WNG-98FXTS1X-B</json:string></ark><categories><wos><json:string>1 - science</json:string><json:string>2 - engineering, biomedical</json:string><json:string>2 - dentistry, oral surgery & medicine</json:string></wos><scienceMetrix><json:string>1 - health sciences</json:string><json:string>2 - clinical medicine</json:string><json:string>3 - dentistry</json:string></scienceMetrix><scopus><json:string>1 - Health Sciences</json:string><json:string>2 - Dentistry</json:string><json:string>3 - Oral Surgery</json:string></scopus><inist><json:string>1 - sciences appliquees, technologies et medecines</json:string><json:string>2 - sciences biologiques et medicales</json:string><json:string>3 - sciences medicales</json:string></inist></categories><publicationDate>1995</publicationDate><copyrightDate>1995</copyrightDate><doi><json:string>10.1034/j.1600-0501.1995.060106.x</json:string></doi><id>F76841918A1038743D6B4F3FB25B975463DC903C</id><score>1</score><fulltext><json:item><extension>pdf</extension><original>true</original><mimetype>application/pdf</mimetype><uri>https://api.istex.fr/document/F76841918A1038743D6B4F3FB25B975463DC903C/fulltext/pdf</uri></json:item><json:item><extension>ocr</extension><original>false</original><mimetype>text/ocr</mimetype><uri>https://api.istex.fr/document/F76841918A1038743D6B4F3FB25B975463DC903C/fulltext/ocr</uri></json:item><json:item><extension>zip</extension><original>false</original><mimetype>application/zip</mimetype><uri>https://api.istex.fr/document/F76841918A1038743D6B4F3FB25B975463DC903C/fulltext/zip</uri></json:item><istex:fulltextTEI uri="https://api.istex.fr/document/F76841918A1038743D6B4F3FB25B975463DC903C/fulltext/tei"><teiHeader><fileDesc><titleStmt><title level="a" type="main">Registration of localization, occlusion and occluding materials for failing screw joints in the Brånemark implant system</title><respStmt><resp>Références bibliographiques récupérées via GROBID</resp><name resp="ISTEX-API">ISTEX-API (INIST-CNRS)</name></respStmt></titleStmt><publicationStmt><authority>ISTEX</authority><publisher>Munksgaard International Publishers</publisher><pubPlace>Copenhagen</pubPlace><date type="published" when="1995-03"></date></publicationStmt><notesStmt><note type="content-type" subtype="article" source="article" scheme="https://content-type.data.istex.fr/ark:/67375/XTP-6N5SZHKN-D">article</note><note type="publication-type" subtype="journal" scheme="https://publication-type.data.istex.fr/ark:/67375/JMC-0GLKJH51-B">journal</note></notesStmt><sourceDesc><biblStruct type="article"><analytic><title level="a" type="main">Registration of localization, occlusion and occluding materials for failing screw joints in the Brånemark implant system</title><title level="a" type="short">Brånemark implant failures</title><author xml:id="author-0000"><persName><forename type="first">H.</forename><surname>Wie</surname></persName><affiliation>Department of Prosthetic Dentistry and Stomatognathic Physiology, University of Oslo, Norway<address><country key="NO"></country></address></affiliation></author><idno type="istex">F76841918A1038743D6B4F3FB25B975463DC903C</idno><idno type="ark">ark:/67375/WNG-98FXTS1X-B</idno><idno type="DOI">10.1034/j.1600-0501.1995.060106.x</idno><idno type="unit">CLR060106</idno><idno type="supplier"></idno><idno type="toTypesetVersion">file:CLR.CLR060106.pdf</idno></analytic><monogr><title level="j" type="main">Clinical Oral Implants Research</title><title level="j" type="alt">CLINICAL ORAL IMPLANTS RESEARCH</title><idno type="pISSN">0905-7161</idno><idno type="eISSN">1600-0501</idno><idno type="book-DOI">10.1111/(ISSN)1600-0501</idno><idno type="book-part-DOI">10.1111/clr.1995.6.issue-1</idno><idno type="product">CLR</idno><idno type="publisherDivision">ST</idno><imprint><biblScope unit="vol">6</biblScope><biblScope unit="issue">1</biblScope><biblScope unit="page" from="47">47</biblScope><biblScope unit="page" to="53">53</biblScope><publisher>Munksgaard International Publishers</publisher><pubPlace>Copenhagen</pubPlace><date type="published" when="1995-03"></date></imprint></monogr></biblStruct></sourceDesc></fileDesc><profileDesc><abstract xml:lang="en" style="main"><p>This study is based on data from routine follow‐up registration following functional loading of a consecutive number of osseointegrated prostheses at the Dental School, University of Oslo. Fifty‐six patients with 240 Brånemark implants were examined 24 months after the implants were loaded, and a protocol form for collecting information about the status of the treatment was completed. The examinations included registration of oral hygiene, pathological alterations in soft and hard tissues, type of material used in contacting occlusal surfaces, occlusal design and technical and mechanical failures. All superstructures, except CeraOne single‐tooth prostheses. were unscrewed for inspection of implant and screw joint mobility. Eighty‐three per cent of the implants were found in the upper and lower frontal segments of the jaws. The survival rate for individual implants in this study was 94%. which is well within the generally accepted level for osseointegrated implant systems. Plaque and soft tissue complications were low and could not be associated with the early losses of implants. Group function was the preferred design of the occlusal contact pattern (53.4%), followed by 37% for canine guidance and about 9% for balanced articulation. Fourteen abutment screws and 7 gold screws loosened during the period between permanent loading and the first follow‐up registration. A majority of the failures occurred in osseointegrated bridges occluding with complete dentures in the opposite jaw. The failing screw joints were found in 25% of the patients, which means that one fourth of the patients needed extra mending appointments. The failures are assumed to be iatrogenic, and measures to avoid them are discussed.</p></abstract><textClass><keywords xml:lang="en"><term xml:id="k1">Brånemark implant</term><term xml:id="k2">screw joint</term><term xml:id="k3">functional loading</term><term xml:id="k4">failure</term></keywords><keywords rend="tocHeading1"><term>Original Articles</term></keywords></textClass><langUsage><language ident="en"></language></langUsage></profileDesc><revisionDesc><change>undefined</change><change>[object Object]</change></revisionDesc></teiHeader></istex:fulltextTEI><json:item><extension>txt</extension><original>false</original><mimetype>text/plain</mimetype><uri>https://api.istex.fr/document/F76841918A1038743D6B4F3FB25B975463DC903C/fulltext/txt</uri></json:item></fulltext><metadata><istex:metadataXml wicri:clean="Wiley component found"><istex:xmlDeclaration>version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" standalone="yes"</istex:xmlDeclaration><istex:document><component version="2.0" type="serialArticle" xml:lang="en"><header><publicationMeta level="product"><publisherInfo><publisherName>Munksgaard International Publishers</publisherName><publisherLoc>Copenhagen</publisherLoc></publisherInfo><doi origin="wiley" registered="yes">10.1111/(ISSN)1600-0501</doi><issn type="print">0905-7161</issn><issn type="electronic">1600-0501</issn><idGroup><id type="product" value="CLR"></id><id type="publisherDivision" value="ST"></id></idGroup><titleGroup><title type="main" sort="CLINICAL ORAL IMPLANTS RESEARCH">Clinical Oral Implants Research</title></titleGroup></publicationMeta><publicationMeta level="part" position="03001"><doi origin="wiley">10.1111/clr.1995.6.issue-1</doi><numberingGroup><numbering type="journalVolume" number="6">6</numbering><numbering type="journalIssue" number="1">1</numbering></numberingGroup><coverDate startDate="1995-03">March 1995</coverDate></publicationMeta><publicationMeta level="unit" type="article" position="0004700" status="forIssue"><doi origin="wiley">10.1034/j.1600-0501.1995.060106.x</doi><idGroup><id type="unit" value="CLR060106"></id><id type="supplier" value=""></id></idGroup><titleGroup><title type="tocHeading1">Original Articles</title></titleGroup><eventGroup><event type="firstOnline" date="2002-06-27"></event><event type="publishedOnlineFinalForm" date="2002-06-27"></event><event type="xmlConverted" agent="Converter:BPG_TO_WML3G version:2.3.2 mode:FullText source:Header result:Header" date="2010-03-15"></event><event type="xmlConverted" agent="Converter:WILEY_ML3G_TO_WILEY_ML3GV2 version:4.0.1" date="2014-03-12"></event><event type="xmlConverted" agent="Converter:WML3G_To_WML3G version:4.1.7 mode:FullText,remove_FC" date="2014-10-16"></event></eventGroup><numberingGroup><numbering type="pageFirst" number="47">47</numbering><numbering type="pageLast" number="53">53</numbering></numberingGroup><correspondenceTo>Henrik Wie, Department of Prosthetic Dentistry and Stomatognathic Physiology, Dental Faculty, University of Oslo, Geitmyrsvn, 7l, PO.Box 1109, Blindern, N‐0317 Oslo, Norway</correspondenceTo><linkGroup><link type="toTypesetVersion" href="file:CLR.CLR060106.pdf"></link></linkGroup></publicationMeta><contentMeta><unparsedEditorialHistory>Accepted for publication 4 July 1994</unparsedEditorialHistory><countGroup><count type="linksPubMed" number="0"></count><count type="linksCrossRef" number="0"></count></countGroup><titleGroup><title type="main">Registration of localization, occlusion and occluding materials for failing screw joints in the Brånemark implant system</title><title type="shortAuthors">Wie</title><title type="short">Brånemark implant failures</title></titleGroup><creators><creator creatorRole="author" xml:id="cr1" affiliationRef="#a1"><personName><givenNames>H.</givenNames><familyName>Wie</familyName></personName></creator></creators><affiliationGroup><affiliation xml:id="a1" countryCode="NO"><unparsedAffiliation>Department of Prosthetic Dentistry and Stomatognathic Physiology, University of Oslo, Norway</unparsedAffiliation></affiliation></affiliationGroup><keywordGroup xml:lang="en"><keyword xml:id="k1">Brånemark implant</keyword><keyword xml:id="k2">screw joint</keyword><keyword xml:id="k3">functional loading</keyword><keyword xml:id="k4">failure</keyword></keywordGroup><abstractGroup><abstract type="main" xml:lang="en"><p>This study is based on data from routine follow‐up registration following functional loading of a consecutive number of osseointegrated prostheses at the Dental School, University of Oslo. Fifty‐six patients with 240 Brånemark implants were examined 24 months after the implants were loaded, and a protocol form for collecting information about the status of the treatment was completed. The examinations included registration of oral hygiene, pathological alterations in soft and hard tissues, type of material used in contacting occlusal surfaces, occlusal design and technical and mechanical failures. All superstructures, except CeraOne single‐tooth prostheses. were unscrewed for inspection of implant and screw joint mobility. Eighty‐three per cent of the implants were found in the upper and lower frontal segments of the jaws. The survival rate for individual implants in this study was 94%. which is well within the generally accepted level for osseointegrated implant systems. Plaque and soft tissue complications were low and could not be associated with the early losses of implants. Group function was the preferred design of the occlusal contact pattern (53.4%), followed by 37% for canine guidance and about 9% for balanced articulation. Fourteen abutment screws and 7 gold screws loosened during the period between permanent loading and the first follow‐up registration. A majority of the failures occurred in osseointegrated bridges occluding with complete dentures in the opposite jaw. The failing screw joints were found in 25% of the patients, which means that one fourth of the patients needed extra mending appointments. The failures are assumed to be iatrogenic, and measures to avoid them are discussed.</p></abstract></abstractGroup></contentMeta></header></component></istex:document></istex:metadataXml><mods version="3.6"><titleInfo lang="en"><title>Registration of localization, occlusion and occluding materials for failing screw joints in the Brånemark implant system</title></titleInfo><titleInfo type="abbreviated" lang="en"><title>Brånemark implant failures</title></titleInfo><titleInfo type="alternative" contentType="CDATA" lang="en"><title>Registration of localization, occlusion and occluding materials for failing screw joints in the Brånemark implant system</title></titleInfo><name type="personal"><namePart type="given">H.</namePart><namePart type="family">Wie</namePart><affiliation>Department of Prosthetic Dentistry and Stomatognathic Physiology, University of Oslo, Norway</affiliation><role><roleTerm type="text">author</roleTerm></role></name><typeOfResource>text</typeOfResource><genre type="article" displayLabel="article" authority="ISTEX" authorityURI="https://content-type.data.istex.fr" valueURI="https://content-type.data.istex.fr/ark:/67375/XTP-6N5SZHKN-D">article</genre><originInfo><publisher>Munksgaard International Publishers</publisher><place><placeTerm type="text">Copenhagen</placeTerm></place><dateIssued encoding="w3cdtf">1995-03</dateIssued><edition>Accepted for publication 4 July 1994</edition><copyrightDate encoding="w3cdtf">1995</copyrightDate></originInfo><language><languageTerm type="code" authority="rfc3066">en</languageTerm><languageTerm type="code" authority="iso639-2b">eng</languageTerm></language><physicalDescription><extent unit="linksCrossRef">0</extent></physicalDescription><abstract lang="en">This study is based on data from routine follow‐up registration following functional loading of a consecutive number of osseointegrated prostheses at the Dental School, University of Oslo. Fifty‐six patients with 240 Brånemark implants were examined 24 months after the implants were loaded, and a protocol form for collecting information about the status of the treatment was completed. The examinations included registration of oral hygiene, pathological alterations in soft and hard tissues, type of material used in contacting occlusal surfaces, occlusal design and technical and mechanical failures. All superstructures, except CeraOne single‐tooth prostheses. were unscrewed for inspection of implant and screw joint mobility. Eighty‐three per cent of the implants were found in the upper and lower frontal segments of the jaws. The survival rate for individual implants in this study was 94%. which is well within the generally accepted level for osseointegrated implant systems. Plaque and soft tissue complications were low and could not be associated with the early losses of implants. Group function was the preferred design of the occlusal contact pattern (53.4%), followed by 37% for canine guidance and about 9% for balanced articulation. Fourteen abutment screws and 7 gold screws loosened during the period between permanent loading and the first follow‐up registration. A majority of the failures occurred in osseointegrated bridges occluding with complete dentures in the opposite jaw. The failing screw joints were found in 25% of the patients, which means that one fourth of the patients needed extra mending appointments. The failures are assumed to be iatrogenic, and measures to avoid them are discussed.</abstract><subject lang="en"><genre>keywords</genre><topic>Brånemark implant</topic><topic>screw joint</topic><topic>functional loading</topic><topic>failure</topic></subject><relatedItem type="host"><titleInfo><title>Clinical Oral Implants Research</title></titleInfo><genre type="journal" authority="ISTEX" authorityURI="https://publication-type.data.istex.fr" valueURI="https://publication-type.data.istex.fr/ark:/67375/JMC-0GLKJH51-B">journal</genre><identifier type="ISSN">0905-7161</identifier><identifier type="eISSN">1600-0501</identifier><identifier type="DOI">10.1111/(ISSN)1600-0501</identifier><identifier type="PublisherID">CLR</identifier><part><date>1995</date><detail type="volume"><caption>vol.</caption><number>6</number></detail><detail type="issue"><caption>no.</caption><number>1</number></detail><extent unit="pages"><start>47</start><end>53</end></extent></part></relatedItem><identifier type="istex">F76841918A1038743D6B4F3FB25B975463DC903C</identifier><identifier type="ark">ark:/67375/WNG-98FXTS1X-B</identifier><identifier type="DOI">10.1034/j.1600-0501.1995.060106.x</identifier><identifier type="ArticleID">CLR060106</identifier><recordInfo><recordContentSource authority="ISTEX" authorityURI="https://loaded-corpus.data.istex.fr" valueURI="https://loaded-corpus.data.istex.fr/ark:/67375/XBH-L0C46X92-X">wiley</recordContentSource><recordOrigin>Munksgaard International Publishers</recordOrigin></recordInfo></mods><json:item><extension>json</extension><original>false</original><mimetype>application/json</mimetype><uri>https://api.istex.fr/document/F76841918A1038743D6B4F3FB25B975463DC903C/metadata/json</uri></json:item></metadata><serie></serie></istex></record>Pour manipuler ce document sous Unix (Dilib)
EXPLOR_STEP=$WICRI_ROOT/Wicri/Santé/explor/EdenteV2/Data/Istex/Corpus
HfdSelect -h $EXPLOR_STEP/biblio.hfd -nk 007A45 | SxmlIndent | more
Ou
HfdSelect -h $EXPLOR_AREA/Data/Istex/Corpus/biblio.hfd -nk 007A45 | SxmlIndent | more
Pour mettre un lien sur cette page dans le réseau Wicri
{{Explor lien
|wiki= Wicri/Santé
|area= EdenteV2
|flux= Istex
|étape= Corpus
|type= RBID
|clé= ISTEX:F76841918A1038743D6B4F3FB25B975463DC903C
|texte= Registration of localization, occlusion and occluding materials for failing screw joints in the Brånemark implant system
}}
| This area was generated with Dilib version V0.6.32. |  |