Institutional innovation, development and environmental management: An ‘administrative trap’ revisited. Part I
Identifieur interne : 007901 ( Istex/Corpus ); précédent : 007900; suivant : 007902Institutional innovation, development and environmental management: An ‘administrative trap’ revisited. Part I
Auteurs : Randall BakerSource :
- Public Administration and Development [ 0271-2075 ] ; 1989-01.
English descriptors
- KwdEn :
- Administrative dimension, Administrative innovation, Administrative trap, Christian science, Clear policy, Desertification, Desertification branch, Development process, Dregne, Ecological, Ecological problem, Ecological problems, Economic growth, Environment fund, Environmental, Environmental assessment, Environmental concerns, Environmental decline, Environmental issues, Environmental laws, Environmental legislation, Environmental management, Environmental policy, Environmental problem, Environmental problems, Environmental protection, Environmental resources, Global, Global conferences, High level, Indiana university, Institutional innovation, Institutional outcome, Ldcs, Management priorities, Many countries, Many ldcs, Member states, Ministry, Nairobi, Nairobi conference, National level, National policy, Nations environment program, Natural resources, Oecd, Other ministries, Poorer countries, Poorer ldcs, Project appraisal, Public administration, Public sector, Real development, Recent developments, Recipient countries, Recipient country, Resource, Same conference, Same time, Sectoral, Sectoral planning sections, Soil erosion, Staff report, Stockholm, Stockholm conference, Structural readjustment, Sustainable development, Unep, Wall street journal, Water resources, Water supplies, World bank.
- Teeft :
- Administrative dimension, Administrative innovation, Administrative trap, Christian science, Clear policy, Desertification, Desertification branch, Development process, Dregne, Ecological, Ecological problem, Ecological problems, Economic growth, Environment fund, Environmental, Environmental assessment, Environmental concerns, Environmental decline, Environmental issues, Environmental laws, Environmental legislation, Environmental management, Environmental policy, Environmental problem, Environmental problems, Environmental protection, Environmental resources, Global, Global conferences, High level, Indiana university, Institutional innovation, Institutional outcome, Ldcs, Management priorities, Many countries, Many ldcs, Member states, Ministry, Nairobi, Nairobi conference, National level, National policy, Nations environment program, Natural resources, Oecd, Other ministries, Poorer countries, Poorer ldcs, Project appraisal, Public administration, Public sector, Real development, Recent developments, Recipient countries, Recipient country, Resource, Same conference, Same time, Sectoral, Sectoral planning sections, Soil erosion, Staff report, Stockholm, Stockholm conference, Structural readjustment, Sustainable development, Unep, Wall street journal, Water resources, Water supplies, World bank.
Abstract
In the first section of this two‐part study the author considers the relationship between administrative structure and the persistence of broad ecological problems. This is set in the context of the issues leading to, and identified at, the Stockholm Conference on the Environment in 1972. It is evident that, despite all the interest and effort, the main parameters of environmental well‐being show that the situation remains at least as bad. The case is made that there is a considerable dysfunction between the nature of ecological problems and the ‘problem‐solving’ structures within the public arena. This dysfunction is here termed the ‘administrative trap’. This section concludes by reviewing three areas in which administrative innovation resulted very largely from the Stockholm initiative: Global Conferences and their attendant Global Institutions; Ministries of the Environment; and ‘reforms’ in the legislative apparatus.
Url:
DOI: 10.1002/pad.4230090104
Links to Exploration step
ISTEX:F41626B980E2119C807AA21344C0717570720FB7Le document en format XML
<record><TEI wicri:istexFullTextTei="biblStruct"><teiHeader><fileDesc><titleStmt><title xml:lang="en">Institutional innovation, development and environmental management: An ‘administrative trap’ revisited. Part I</title><author><name sortKey="Baker, Randall" sort="Baker, Randall" uniqKey="Baker R" first="Randall" last="Baker">Randall Baker</name><affiliation><mods:affiliation>Indiana University, Bloomington, Indiana 47405, USA</mods:affiliation></affiliation><affiliation><mods:affiliation>Correspondence address: Professor Baker is in the School of Public and Environmental Affairs, Indiana University, Bloomington, Indiana 47405, USA</mods:affiliation></affiliation></author></titleStmt><publicationStmt><idno type="wicri:source">ISTEX</idno><idno type="RBID">ISTEX:F41626B980E2119C807AA21344C0717570720FB7</idno><date when="1989" year="1989">1989</date><idno type="doi">10.1002/pad.4230090104</idno><idno type="url">https://api.istex.fr/document/F41626B980E2119C807AA21344C0717570720FB7/fulltext/pdf</idno><idno type="wicri:Area/Istex/Corpus">007901</idno><idno type="wicri:explorRef" wicri:stream="Istex" wicri:step="Corpus" wicri:corpus="ISTEX">007901</idno></publicationStmt><sourceDesc><biblStruct><analytic><title level="a" type="main" xml:lang="en">Institutional innovation, development and environmental management: An ‘administrative trap’ revisited. Part I</title><author><name sortKey="Baker, Randall" sort="Baker, Randall" uniqKey="Baker R" first="Randall" last="Baker">Randall Baker</name><affiliation><mods:affiliation>Indiana University, Bloomington, Indiana 47405, USA</mods:affiliation></affiliation><affiliation><mods:affiliation>Correspondence address: Professor Baker is in the School of Public and Environmental Affairs, Indiana University, Bloomington, Indiana 47405, USA</mods:affiliation></affiliation></author></analytic><monogr></monogr><series><title level="j" type="main">Public Administration and Development</title><title level="j" type="alt">PUBLIC ADMINISTRATION AND DEVELOPMENT</title><idno type="ISSN">0271-2075</idno><idno type="eISSN">1099-162X</idno><imprint><biblScope unit="vol">9</biblScope><biblScope unit="issue">1</biblScope><biblScope unit="page" from="29">29</biblScope><biblScope unit="page" to="47">47</biblScope><biblScope unit="page-count">19</biblScope><publisher>John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.</publisher><pubPlace>New York</pubPlace><date type="published" when="1989-01">1989-01</date></imprint><idno type="ISSN">0271-2075</idno></series></biblStruct></sourceDesc><seriesStmt><idno type="ISSN">0271-2075</idno></seriesStmt></fileDesc><profileDesc><textClass><keywords scheme="KwdEn" xml:lang="en"><term>Administrative dimension</term><term>Administrative innovation</term><term>Administrative trap</term><term>Christian science</term><term>Clear policy</term><term>Desertification</term><term>Desertification branch</term><term>Development process</term><term>Dregne</term><term>Ecological</term><term>Ecological problem</term><term>Ecological problems</term><term>Economic growth</term><term>Environment fund</term><term>Environmental</term><term>Environmental assessment</term><term>Environmental concerns</term><term>Environmental decline</term><term>Environmental issues</term><term>Environmental laws</term><term>Environmental legislation</term><term>Environmental management</term><term>Environmental policy</term><term>Environmental problem</term><term>Environmental problems</term><term>Environmental protection</term><term>Environmental resources</term><term>Global</term><term>Global conferences</term><term>High level</term><term>Indiana university</term><term>Institutional innovation</term><term>Institutional outcome</term><term>Ldcs</term><term>Management priorities</term><term>Many countries</term><term>Many ldcs</term><term>Member states</term><term>Ministry</term><term>Nairobi</term><term>Nairobi conference</term><term>National level</term><term>National policy</term><term>Nations environment program</term><term>Natural resources</term><term>Oecd</term><term>Other ministries</term><term>Poorer countries</term><term>Poorer ldcs</term><term>Project appraisal</term><term>Public administration</term><term>Public sector</term><term>Real development</term><term>Recent developments</term><term>Recipient countries</term><term>Recipient country</term><term>Resource</term><term>Same conference</term><term>Same time</term><term>Sectoral</term><term>Sectoral planning sections</term><term>Soil erosion</term><term>Staff report</term><term>Stockholm</term><term>Stockholm conference</term><term>Structural readjustment</term><term>Sustainable development</term><term>Unep</term><term>Wall street journal</term><term>Water resources</term><term>Water supplies</term><term>World bank</term></keywords><keywords scheme="Teeft" xml:lang="en"><term>Administrative dimension</term><term>Administrative innovation</term><term>Administrative trap</term><term>Christian science</term><term>Clear policy</term><term>Desertification</term><term>Desertification branch</term><term>Development process</term><term>Dregne</term><term>Ecological</term><term>Ecological problem</term><term>Ecological problems</term><term>Economic growth</term><term>Environment fund</term><term>Environmental</term><term>Environmental assessment</term><term>Environmental concerns</term><term>Environmental decline</term><term>Environmental issues</term><term>Environmental laws</term><term>Environmental legislation</term><term>Environmental management</term><term>Environmental policy</term><term>Environmental problem</term><term>Environmental problems</term><term>Environmental protection</term><term>Environmental resources</term><term>Global</term><term>Global conferences</term><term>High level</term><term>Indiana university</term><term>Institutional innovation</term><term>Institutional outcome</term><term>Ldcs</term><term>Management priorities</term><term>Many countries</term><term>Many ldcs</term><term>Member states</term><term>Ministry</term><term>Nairobi</term><term>Nairobi conference</term><term>National level</term><term>National policy</term><term>Nations environment program</term><term>Natural resources</term><term>Oecd</term><term>Other ministries</term><term>Poorer countries</term><term>Poorer ldcs</term><term>Project appraisal</term><term>Public administration</term><term>Public sector</term><term>Real development</term><term>Recent developments</term><term>Recipient countries</term><term>Recipient country</term><term>Resource</term><term>Same conference</term><term>Same time</term><term>Sectoral</term><term>Sectoral planning sections</term><term>Soil erosion</term><term>Staff report</term><term>Stockholm</term><term>Stockholm conference</term><term>Structural readjustment</term><term>Sustainable development</term><term>Unep</term><term>Wall street journal</term><term>Water resources</term><term>Water supplies</term><term>World bank</term></keywords></textClass></profileDesc></teiHeader><front><div type="abstract" xml:lang="en">In the first section of this two‐part study the author considers the relationship between administrative structure and the persistence of broad ecological problems. This is set in the context of the issues leading to, and identified at, the Stockholm Conference on the Environment in 1972. It is evident that, despite all the interest and effort, the main parameters of environmental well‐being show that the situation remains at least as bad. The case is made that there is a considerable dysfunction between the nature of ecological problems and the ‘problem‐solving’ structures within the public arena. This dysfunction is here termed the ‘administrative trap’. This section concludes by reviewing three areas in which administrative innovation resulted very largely from the Stockholm initiative: Global Conferences and their attendant Global Institutions; Ministries of the Environment; and ‘reforms’ in the legislative apparatus.</div></front></TEI><istex><corpusName>wiley</corpusName><keywords><teeft><json:string>unep</json:string><json:string>stockholm</json:string><json:string>environmental management</json:string><json:string>ldcs</json:string><json:string>desertification</json:string><json:string>sectoral</json:string><json:string>oecd</json:string><json:string>institutional innovation</json:string><json:string>administrative trap</json:string><json:string>natural resources</json:string><json:string>dregne</json:string><json:string>national level</json:string><json:string>environmental</json:string><json:string>environmental problems</json:string><json:string>soil erosion</json:string><json:string>high level</json:string><json:string>public sector</json:string><json:string>national policy</json:string><json:string>world bank</json:string><json:string>nairobi</json:string><json:string>same time</json:string><json:string>stockholm conference</json:string><json:string>christian science</json:string><json:string>water resources</json:string><json:string>environmental protection</json:string><json:string>economic growth</json:string><json:string>public administration</json:string><json:string>nairobi conference</json:string><json:string>environmental concerns</json:string><json:string>environmental problem</json:string><json:string>environmental resources</json:string><json:string>management priorities</json:string><json:string>nations environment program</json:string><json:string>ecological problems</json:string><json:string>same conference</json:string><json:string>environmental laws</json:string><json:string>ecological problem</json:string><json:string>structural readjustment</json:string><json:string>many ldcs</json:string><json:string>environmental decline</json:string><json:string>poorer ldcs</json:string><json:string>indiana university</json:string><json:string>recipient country</json:string><json:string>global conferences</json:string><json:string>environmental assessment</json:string><json:string>environmental policy</json:string><json:string>recipient countries</json:string><json:string>wall street journal</json:string><json:string>administrative innovation</json:string><json:string>project appraisal</json:string><json:string>staff report</json:string><json:string>water supplies</json:string><json:string>administrative dimension</json:string><json:string>member states</json:string><json:string>environmental issues</json:string><json:string>institutional outcome</json:string><json:string>environment fund</json:string><json:string>development process</json:string><json:string>desertification branch</json:string><json:string>sustainable development</json:string><json:string>recent developments</json:string><json:string>environmental legislation</json:string><json:string>other ministries</json:string><json:string>real development</json:string><json:string>many countries</json:string><json:string>sectoral planning sections</json:string><json:string>clear policy</json:string><json:string>poorer countries</json:string><json:string>ecological</json:string><json:string>ministry</json:string><json:string>resource</json:string><json:string>global</json:string></teeft></keywords><author><json:item><name>Randall Baker</name><affiliations><json:string>Indiana University, Bloomington, Indiana 47405, USA</json:string><json:string>Correspondence address: Professor Baker is in the School of Public and Environmental Affairs, Indiana University, Bloomington, Indiana 47405, USA</json:string></affiliations></json:item></author><articleId><json:string>PAD4230090104</json:string></articleId><arkIstex>ark:/67375/WNG-LHWRRNLR-L</arkIstex><language><json:string>eng</json:string></language><originalGenre><json:string>article</json:string></originalGenre><abstract>In the first section of this two‐part study the author considers the relationship between administrative structure and the persistence of broad ecological problems. This is set in the context of the issues leading to, and identified at, the Stockholm Conference on the Environment in 1972. It is evident that, despite all the interest and effort, the main parameters of environmental well‐being show that the situation remains at least as bad. The case is made that there is a considerable dysfunction between the nature of ecological problems and the ‘problem‐solving’ structures within the public arena. This dysfunction is here termed the ‘administrative trap’. This section concludes by reviewing three areas in which administrative innovation resulted very largely from the Stockholm initiative: Global Conferences and their attendant Global Institutions; Ministries of the Environment; and ‘reforms’ in the legislative apparatus.</abstract><qualityIndicators><score>8.644</score><pdfWordCount>7566</pdfWordCount><pdfCharCount>46445</pdfCharCount><pdfVersion>1.3</pdfVersion><pdfPageCount>19</pdfPageCount><pdfPageSize>468 x 702 pts</pdfPageSize><refBibsNative>true</refBibsNative><abstractWordCount>137</abstractWordCount><abstractCharCount>935</abstractCharCount><keywordCount>0</keywordCount></qualityIndicators><title>Institutional innovation, development and environmental management: An ‘administrative trap’ revisited. Part I</title><genre><json:string>article</json:string></genre><host><title>Public Administration and Development</title><language><json:string>unknown</json:string></language><doi><json:string>10.1002/(ISSN)1099-162X</json:string></doi><issn><json:string>0271-2075</json:string></issn><eissn><json:string>1099-162X</json:string></eissn><publisherId><json:string>PAD</json:string></publisherId><volume>9</volume><issue>1</issue><pages><first>29</first><last>47</last><total>19</total></pages><genre><json:string>journal</json:string></genre><subject><json:item><value>Article</value></json:item></subject></host><namedEntities><unitex><date><json:string>1974</json:string><json:string>2000</json:string><json:string>1981</json:string><json:string>1970</json:string><json:string>1986</json:string><json:string>1982</json:string><json:string>1960s</json:string><json:string>1987</json:string><json:string>1972</json:string><json:string>1970s</json:string><json:string>1989</json:string><json:string>1980s</json:string><json:string>1985</json:string></date><geogName><json:string>Babai River dam</json:string><json:string>Cauvery River</json:string></geogName><orgName><json:string>Industry Sudan Ministry of Agriculture and Natural Resources</json:string><json:string>ENVIRONMENTAL DIMENSION The</json:string><json:string>World Bank</json:string><json:string>Environment Jordan Ministry of Municipal, Rural and Environmental Affairs</json:string><json:string>United States Agency for International Development</json:string><json:string>Independent Commission and the UN</json:string><json:string>US Congress</json:string><json:string>EEC Commission</json:string><json:string>World Commission on Environment and Development</json:string><json:string>Environmental Assessment</json:string><json:string>Wall Street Journal</json:string><json:string>Christian Science Monitor</json:string><json:string>UNDP</json:string><json:string>Sierra Club</json:string><json:string>Environment Morocco Ministry of Housing, Development and Environment</json:string><json:string>Environment Indonesia Ministry of Population</json:string><json:string>Sons, Ltd.</json:string><json:string>Environment Luxembourg Ministry of the Environment Ireland Ministry of the Environment France Ministry of the Environment Finland Ministry of the Environment Denmark Ministry of the Environment Austria Ministry of Health and Environment</json:string><json:string>Environment Venezuela Zaire Department of the Environment Uganda Ministry of Environmental Protection Ministry of Environment and Natural Resources</json:string><json:string>Indiana University</json:string><json:string>Environmental Policies and Procedures</json:string><json:string>Environment Greece Ministry of Physical Planning, Housing and Environment</json:string><json:string>American Association for the Advancement of Science</json:string><json:string>Colombia and Niger</json:string><json:string>Research and the Application of Science and Technology</json:string><json:string>Environment Singapore Norway Minist</json:string><json:string>OECD</json:string><json:string>UNEP</json:string><json:string>Senate Committee on Science and Technology</json:string><json:string>US House of Representatives</json:string><json:string>Environmental Resources and Management</json:string><json:string>Dominican Republic, Nepal</json:string><json:string>Environment Suriname Ministry of Natural Resources and Energy</json:string><json:string>Public and Environmental Affairs, Indiana University, Bloomington, Indiana</json:string><json:string>FOR ENVIRONMENTAL ACTION A B C D E F MINJSTRY OF THE ENVIRONMENT PLANS AND PROGRAMMES POLICY, LEGISLATIONAND LOBBYING FOREIGN AID PROJECTS UNACTION REGIONS AND PROBLEM AREAS Figure</json:string><json:string>Congress</json:string><json:string>UNESCO</json:string><json:string>Institutional Innovation and Environmental Management</json:string><json:string>Tourism Mali Ministry of Natural Resources and Animal Husbandry</json:string><json:string>Independent World Commission on Environment and Development</json:string></orgName><orgName_funder></orgName_funder><orgName_provider></orgName_provider><persName><json:string>Declaration</json:string><json:string>Office</json:string><json:string>Bank</json:string><json:string>R. Wis</json:string><json:string>John Wiley</json:string><json:string>Monitor</json:string><json:string>Dennis Meadows</json:string><json:string>Kurt Waldheim</json:string><json:string>Robert Kasten</json:string><json:string>Experience</json:string><json:string>Economist</json:string><json:string>Ministry</json:string><json:string>Staff Report</json:string><json:string>R. D. Munro</json:string><json:string>Dregne</json:string><json:string>Britain Department</json:string><json:string>Susan A. Hobbs</json:string><json:string>Christian Science</json:string><json:string>Kenya Burkina</json:string><json:string>Mustapha Tolba</json:string><json:string>William J. Siffin</json:string></persName><placeName><json:string>United States</json:string><json:string>Mexico</json:string><json:string>Seoul</json:string><json:string>Brazil</json:string><json:string>US</json:string><json:string>Kenya</json:string><json:string>American</json:string><json:string>India</json:string><json:string>Europe</json:string><json:string>Japan</json:string><json:string>America</json:string><json:string>South Africa</json:string><json:string>Bissau</json:string><json:string>Rome</json:string><json:string>Britain</json:string><json:string>Guyana</json:string><json:string>Ireland</json:string><json:string>Stockholm</json:string><json:string>Guinea</json:string><json:string>Nairobi</json:string></placeName><ref_url></ref_url><ref_bibl><json:string>Dregne, 1985</json:string><json:string>Dregne, 1985, p. 31</json:string><json:string>UNEP, 1982, p. 55</json:string><json:string>Baker, 1976</json:string><json:string>Miller, 1979, p. 23</json:string><json:string>Baker, 1987</json:string><json:string>March 1987</json:string><json:string>Global 2000</json:string><json:string>UNEP, 1981, p. 68</json:string><json:string>Tolba, 1982</json:string><json:string>EEC Commission, 1983</json:string><json:string>Kinyanjui and Baker, 1980</json:string><json:string>May 1987</json:string><json:string>OECD, 1982b, p. 102</json:string><json:string>UNDP, 1980</json:string><json:string>UNEP, 1982</json:string><json:string>Eckholm, 1982, p. 14</json:string><json:string>UNEP, 1982, p. 53</json:string><json:string>OECD, 1982b, p. 107</json:string><json:string>OECD, 1982a, p. 65</json:string><json:string>Miller, 1979, p. 26</json:string><json:string>Munro, 1982, p. 4</json:string><json:string>UNEP, 1982, p. 52</json:string><json:string>UNESCO, 1979</json:string><json:string>Myers and Myers, 1983, p. 22</json:string><json:string>Carpenter and Dixon, 1985, p. 8</json:string><json:string>Baker, 1984</json:string><json:string>Johnels, 1983</json:string><json:string>Stein and Johnson, 1979</json:string><json:string>Meadows, 1971</json:string><json:string>Munro, 1983</json:string><json:string>US House of Representatives, 1981, p. 180</json:string><json:string>Science, 1987, p. 963</json:string></ref_bibl><bibl></bibl></unitex></namedEntities><ark><json:string>ark:/67375/WNG-LHWRRNLR-L</json:string></ark><categories><wos><json:string>1 - social science</json:string><json:string>2 - public administration</json:string><json:string>2 - planning & development</json:string></wos><scienceMetrix><json:string>1 - economic & social sciences</json:string><json:string>2 - social sciences</json:string><json:string>3 - political science & public administration</json:string></scienceMetrix><scopus><json:string>1 - Social Sciences</json:string><json:string>2 - Social Sciences</json:string><json:string>3 - Public Administration</json:string><json:string>1 - Social Sciences</json:string><json:string>2 - Social Sciences</json:string><json:string>3 - Development</json:string></scopus><inist><json:string>1 - sciences humaines et sociales</json:string></inist></categories><publicationDate>1989</publicationDate><copyrightDate>1989</copyrightDate><doi><json:string>10.1002/pad.4230090104</json:string></doi><id>F41626B980E2119C807AA21344C0717570720FB7</id><score>1</score><fulltext><json:item><extension>pdf</extension><original>true</original><mimetype>application/pdf</mimetype><uri>https://api.istex.fr/document/F41626B980E2119C807AA21344C0717570720FB7/fulltext/pdf</uri></json:item><json:item><extension>zip</extension><original>false</original><mimetype>application/zip</mimetype><uri>https://api.istex.fr/document/F41626B980E2119C807AA21344C0717570720FB7/fulltext/zip</uri></json:item><istex:fulltextTEI uri="https://api.istex.fr/document/F41626B980E2119C807AA21344C0717570720FB7/fulltext/tei"><teiHeader><fileDesc><titleStmt><title level="a" type="main" xml:lang="en">Institutional innovation, development and environmental management: An ‘administrative trap’ revisited. Part I</title></titleStmt><publicationStmt><authority>ISTEX</authority><publisher>John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.</publisher><pubPlace>New York</pubPlace><availability><licence>Copyright © 1989 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.</licence></availability><date type="published" when="1989-01"></date></publicationStmt><notesStmt><note type="content-type" subtype="article" source="article" scheme="https://content-type.data.istex.fr/ark:/67375/XTP-6N5SZHKN-D">article</note><note type="publication-type" subtype="journal" scheme="https://publication-type.data.istex.fr/ark:/67375/JMC-0GLKJH51-B">journal</note></notesStmt><sourceDesc><biblStruct type="article"><analytic><title level="a" type="main" xml:lang="en">Institutional innovation, development and environmental management: An ‘administrative trap’ revisited. Part I</title><title level="a" type="short" xml:lang="en">Institutional Innovation and Environmental Management</title><author xml:id="author-0000" role="corresp"><persName><forename type="first">Randall</forename><surname>Baker</surname></persName><affiliation>Indiana University, Bloomington, Indiana 47405, USA<address><country key="US"></country></address></affiliation><affiliation>Professor Baker is in the School of Public and Environmental Affairs, Indiana University, Bloomington, Indiana 47405, USA</affiliation></author><idno type="istex">F41626B980E2119C807AA21344C0717570720FB7</idno><idno type="ark">ark:/67375/WNG-LHWRRNLR-L</idno><idno type="DOI">10.1002/pad.4230090104</idno><idno type="unit">PAD4230090104</idno><idno type="toTypesetVersion">file:PAD.PAD4230090104.pdf</idno></analytic><monogr><title level="j" type="main">Public Administration and Development</title><title level="j" type="alt">PUBLIC ADMINISTRATION AND DEVELOPMENT</title><idno type="pISSN">0271-2075</idno><idno type="eISSN">1099-162X</idno><idno type="book-DOI">10.1002/(ISSN)1099-162X</idno><idno type="book-part-DOI">10.1002/pad.v9:1</idno><idno type="product">PAD</idno><imprint><biblScope unit="vol">9</biblScope><biblScope unit="issue">1</biblScope><biblScope unit="page" from="29">29</biblScope><biblScope unit="page" to="47">47</biblScope><biblScope unit="page-count">19</biblScope><publisher>John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.</publisher><pubPlace>New York</pubPlace><date type="published" when="1989-01"></date></imprint></monogr></biblStruct></sourceDesc></fileDesc><profileDesc><abstract xml:lang="en" style="main"><head>Abstract</head><p>In the first section of this two‐part study the author considers the relationship between administrative structure and the persistence of broad ecological problems. This is set in the context of the issues leading to, and identified at, the Stockholm Conference on the Environment in 1972. It is evident that, despite all the interest and effort, the main parameters of environmental well‐being show that the situation remains at least as bad. The case is made that there is a considerable dysfunction between the nature of ecological problems and the ‘problem‐solving’ structures within the public arena. This dysfunction is here termed the ‘administrative trap’. This section concludes by reviewing three areas in which administrative innovation resulted very largely from the Stockholm initiative: Global Conferences and their attendant Global Institutions; Ministries of the Environment; and ‘reforms’ in the legislative apparatus.</p></abstract><textClass><keywords rend="articleCategory"><term>Article</term></keywords><keywords rend="tocHeading1"><term>Articles</term></keywords></textClass><langUsage><language ident="en"></language></langUsage></profileDesc></teiHeader></istex:fulltextTEI><json:item><extension>txt</extension><original>false</original><mimetype>text/plain</mimetype><uri>https://api.istex.fr/document/F41626B980E2119C807AA21344C0717570720FB7/fulltext/txt</uri></json:item></fulltext><metadata><istex:metadataXml wicri:clean="Wiley, elements deleted: body"><istex:xmlDeclaration>version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" standalone="yes"</istex:xmlDeclaration><istex:document><component version="2.0" type="serialArticle" xml:lang="en"><header><publicationMeta level="product"><publisherInfo><publisherName>John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.</publisherName><publisherLoc>New York</publisherLoc></publisherInfo><doi registered="yes">10.1002/(ISSN)1099-162X</doi><issn type="print">0271-2075</issn><issn type="electronic">1099-162X</issn><idGroup><id type="product" value="PAD"></id></idGroup><titleGroup><title type="main" xml:lang="en" sort="PUBLIC ADMINISTRATION AND DEVELOPMENT">Public Administration and Development</title><title type="short">Public Admin. Dev.</title></titleGroup></publicationMeta><publicationMeta level="part" position="10"><doi origin="wiley" registered="yes">10.1002/pad.v9:1</doi><numberingGroup><numbering type="journalVolume" number="9">9</numbering><numbering type="journalIssue">1</numbering></numberingGroup><coverDate startDate="1989-01">January/March 1989</coverDate></publicationMeta><publicationMeta level="unit" type="article" position="4" status="forIssue"><doi origin="wiley" registered="yes">10.1002/pad.4230090104</doi><idGroup><id type="unit" value="PAD4230090104"></id></idGroup><countGroup><count type="pageTotal" number="19"></count></countGroup><titleGroup><title type="articleCategory">Article</title><title type="tocHeading1">Articles</title></titleGroup><copyright ownership="publisher">Copyright © 1989 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.</copyright><eventGroup><event type="firstOnline" date="2006-11-02"></event><event type="publishedOnlineFinalForm" date="2006-11-02"></event><event type="xmlConverted" agent="Converter:JWSART34_TO_WML3G version:2.3.2 mode:FullText source:HeaderRef result:HeaderRef" date="2010-03-02"></event><event type="xmlConverted" agent="Converter:WILEY_ML3G_TO_WILEY_ML3GV2 version:3.8.8" date="2014-02-06"></event><event type="xmlConverted" agent="Converter:WML3G_To_WML3G version:4.1.7 mode:FullText,remove_FC" date="2014-11-03"></event></eventGroup><numberingGroup><numbering type="pageFirst">29</numbering><numbering type="pageLast">47</numbering></numberingGroup><correspondenceTo>Professor Baker is in the School of Public and Environmental Affairs, Indiana University, Bloomington, Indiana 47405, USA</correspondenceTo><linkGroup><link type="toTypesetVersion" href="file:PAD.PAD4230090104.pdf"></link></linkGroup></publicationMeta><contentMeta><countGroup><count type="figureTotal" number="3"></count><count type="tableTotal" number="1"></count><count type="referenceTotal" number="37"></count></countGroup><titleGroup><title type="main" xml:lang="en">Institutional innovation, development and environmental management: An ‘administrative trap’ revisited. Part I</title><title type="short" xml:lang="en">Institutional Innovation and Environmental Management</title></titleGroup><creators><creator xml:id="au1" creatorRole="author" affiliationRef="#af1" corresponding="yes"><personName><givenNames>Randall</givenNames><familyName>Baker</familyName></personName></creator></creators><affiliationGroup><affiliation xml:id="af1" countryCode="US" type="organization"><unparsedAffiliation>Indiana University, Bloomington, Indiana 47405, USA</unparsedAffiliation></affiliation></affiliationGroup><abstractGroup><abstract type="main" xml:lang="en"><title type="main">Abstract</title><p>In the first section of this two‐part study the author considers the relationship between administrative structure and the persistence of broad ecological problems. This is set in the context of the issues leading to, and identified at, the Stockholm Conference on the Environment in 1972. It is evident that, despite all the interest and effort, the main parameters of environmental well‐being show that the situation remains at least as bad. The case is made that there is a considerable dysfunction between the nature of ecological problems and the ‘problem‐solving’ structures within the public arena. This dysfunction is here termed the ‘administrative trap’. This section concludes by reviewing three areas in which administrative innovation resulted very largely from the Stockholm initiative: Global Conferences and their attendant Global Institutions; Ministries of the Environment; and ‘reforms’ in the legislative apparatus.</p></abstract></abstractGroup></contentMeta></header></component></istex:document></istex:metadataXml><mods version="3.6"><titleInfo lang="en"><title>Institutional innovation, development and environmental management: An ‘administrative trap’ revisited. Part I</title></titleInfo><titleInfo type="abbreviated" lang="en"><title>Institutional Innovation and Environmental Management</title></titleInfo><titleInfo type="alternative" contentType="CDATA" lang="en"><title>Institutional innovation, development and environmental management: An ‘administrative trap’ revisited. Part I</title></titleInfo><name type="personal"><namePart type="given">Randall</namePart><namePart type="family">Baker</namePart><affiliation>Indiana University, Bloomington, Indiana 47405, USA</affiliation><affiliation>Correspondence address: Professor Baker is in the School of Public and Environmental Affairs, Indiana University, Bloomington, Indiana 47405, USA</affiliation><role><roleTerm type="text">author</roleTerm></role></name><typeOfResource>text</typeOfResource><genre type="article" displayLabel="article" authority="ISTEX" authorityURI="https://content-type.data.istex.fr" valueURI="https://content-type.data.istex.fr/ark:/67375/XTP-6N5SZHKN-D">article</genre><originInfo><publisher>John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.</publisher><place><placeTerm type="text">New York</placeTerm></place><dateIssued encoding="w3cdtf">1989-01</dateIssued><copyrightDate encoding="w3cdtf">1989</copyrightDate></originInfo><language><languageTerm type="code" authority="rfc3066">en</languageTerm><languageTerm type="code" authority="iso639-2b">eng</languageTerm></language><physicalDescription><extent unit="figures">3</extent><extent unit="tables">1</extent><extent unit="references">37</extent></physicalDescription><abstract lang="en">In the first section of this two‐part study the author considers the relationship between administrative structure and the persistence of broad ecological problems. This is set in the context of the issues leading to, and identified at, the Stockholm Conference on the Environment in 1972. It is evident that, despite all the interest and effort, the main parameters of environmental well‐being show that the situation remains at least as bad. The case is made that there is a considerable dysfunction between the nature of ecological problems and the ‘problem‐solving’ structures within the public arena. This dysfunction is here termed the ‘administrative trap’. This section concludes by reviewing three areas in which administrative innovation resulted very largely from the Stockholm initiative: Global Conferences and their attendant Global Institutions; Ministries of the Environment; and ‘reforms’ in the legislative apparatus.</abstract><relatedItem type="host"><titleInfo><title>Public Administration and Development</title></titleInfo><titleInfo type="abbreviated"><title>Public Admin. Dev.</title></titleInfo><genre type="journal" authority="ISTEX" authorityURI="https://publication-type.data.istex.fr" valueURI="https://publication-type.data.istex.fr/ark:/67375/JMC-0GLKJH51-B">journal</genre><subject><genre>article-category</genre><topic>Article</topic></subject><identifier type="ISSN">0271-2075</identifier><identifier type="eISSN">1099-162X</identifier><identifier type="DOI">10.1002/(ISSN)1099-162X</identifier><identifier type="PublisherID">PAD</identifier><part><date>1989</date><detail type="volume"><caption>vol.</caption><number>9</number></detail><detail type="issue"><caption>no.</caption><number>1</number></detail><extent unit="pages"><start>29</start><end>47</end><total>19</total></extent></part></relatedItem><identifier type="istex">F41626B980E2119C807AA21344C0717570720FB7</identifier><identifier type="ark">ark:/67375/WNG-LHWRRNLR-L</identifier><identifier type="DOI">10.1002/pad.4230090104</identifier><identifier type="ArticleID">PAD4230090104</identifier><accessCondition type="use and reproduction" contentType="copyright">Copyright © 1989 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.</accessCondition><recordInfo><recordContentSource authority="ISTEX" authorityURI="https://loaded-corpus.data.istex.fr" valueURI="https://loaded-corpus.data.istex.fr/ark:/67375/XBH-L0C46X92-X">wiley</recordContentSource><recordOrigin>John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.</recordOrigin></recordInfo></mods><json:item><extension>json</extension><original>false</original><mimetype>application/json</mimetype><uri>https://api.istex.fr/document/F41626B980E2119C807AA21344C0717570720FB7/metadata/json</uri></json:item></metadata><serie></serie></istex></record>Pour manipuler ce document sous Unix (Dilib)
EXPLOR_STEP=$WICRI_ROOT/Wicri/Santé/explor/EdenteV2/Data/Istex/Corpus
HfdSelect -h $EXPLOR_STEP/biblio.hfd -nk 007901 | SxmlIndent | more
Ou
HfdSelect -h $EXPLOR_AREA/Data/Istex/Corpus/biblio.hfd -nk 007901 | SxmlIndent | more
Pour mettre un lien sur cette page dans le réseau Wicri
{{Explor lien
|wiki= Wicri/Santé
|area= EdenteV2
|flux= Istex
|étape= Corpus
|type= RBID
|clé= ISTEX:F41626B980E2119C807AA21344C0717570720FB7
|texte= Institutional innovation, development and environmental management: An ‘administrative trap’ revisited. Part I
}}
| This area was generated with Dilib version V0.6.32. |  |