Clinical and Histologic Findings for Microimplants Placed in One Stage and Loaded for Three Months: A Case Report
Identifieur interne : 007895 ( Istex/Corpus ); précédent : 007894; suivant : 007896Clinical and Histologic Findings for Microimplants Placed in One Stage and Loaded for Three Months: A Case Report
Auteurs : William Becker ; Lars Sennerby ; Burton E. Becker ; Patrick HenrySource :
- Clinical Implant Dentistry and Related Research [ 1523-0899 ] ; 2002-01.
English descriptors
- KwdEn :
- Additional microimplants, Anterior region, Becker, Bone resorption, Brinemark, Brinemark implants, Case report, Clin, Clinical study, Denture, Direct contact, Edentulous, Edentulous mandible, Ericsson, Excellent contact, Highest percentage, Histologic, Histologic examination, Histologic findings, Implant, Implant placement, Implant sites, Intimate contact, Keratinized, Keratinized mucosa, Light microradiogram, Mandibular, Marginal bone resorption, Microimplant, Microimplants, Microradiogram, Nonaxially, Nonsubmerged titanium implants, Oral maxillofac implants, Osseointegrated, Osseointegrated implants, Preoperative panogram, Private practice, Prospective multicenter study, Resorption, Same specimen, Second thread, Standard implants, Titanium.
- Teeft :
- Additional microimplants, Anterior region, Becker, Bone resorption, Brinemark, Brinemark implants, Case report, Clin, Clinical study, Denture, Direct contact, Edentulous, Edentulous mandible, Ericsson, Excellent contact, Highest percentage, Histologic, Histologic examination, Histologic findings, Implant, Implant placement, Implant sites, Intimate contact, Keratinized, Keratinized mucosa, Light microradiogram, Mandibular, Marginal bone resorption, Microimplant, Microimplants, Microradiogram, Nonaxially, Nonsubmerged titanium implants, Oral maxillofac implants, Osseointegrated, Osseointegrated implants, Preoperative panogram, Private practice, Prospective multicenter study, Resorption, Same specimen, Second thread, Standard implants, Titanium.
Abstract
Background: Implants are placed in either one or two stages. There is an absence of histologic human evidence relating to implant integration after loading. Purpose: The purpose of this case report was to present clinical and histologic findings for smooth‐surfaced titanium turned microimplants placed in one stage and loaded after healing. Materials and Methods: Five one‐piece microimplants were placed in a fully edentulous mandible. Three microimplants (tests) were placed in one stage and extended through the keratinized mucosa for 3 mm. Two additional microimplants (controls) were placed even with the mucosa. After 3 months of healing, three test implants were loaded for an additional 3 months. At this time, three loaded implants and one control were removed en bloc. Results: Histologic and histometric evaluations were made. For all specimens, there was excellent bone‐to‐implant contact. The loaded implants had from two to four exposed threads. Using marginal bone levels as the reference, the highest percentage of bone‐to‐implant contact was noted with the unloaded control implant (92.2%). One nonaxially loaded implant had 66.9% bone‐to‐implant contact, whereas the axially loaded implants (n = 2) had 77.8% bone‐to‐implant contact. Conclusions: Within the limits of this case report, smooth‐surfaced, titanium threaded microimplants placed in one stage and loaded for 3 months demonstrated excellent osseointegration, with varying bone‐to‐implant contact. The amount of bone‐to‐implant contact may be related to axial implant loading.
Url:
DOI: 10.1111/j.1708-8208.2002.tb00151.x
Links to Exploration step
ISTEX:F3F16B756576E88C58816756FA7BCDD0CF9897ECLe document en format XML
<record><TEI wicri:istexFullTextTei="biblStruct"><teiHeader><fileDesc><titleStmt><title xml:lang="en">Clinical and Histologic Findings for Microimplants Placed in One Stage and Loaded for Three Months: A Case Report</title><author><name sortKey="Becker, William" sort="Becker, William" uniqKey="Becker W" first="William" last="Becker">William Becker</name><affiliation><mods:affiliation>Private Practice, Tucson, Arizona, Clinical Professor, Department of Periodontology, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, California; Affiliate Professor, Department of Graduate Periodontics, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington</mods:affiliation></affiliation></author><author><name sortKey="Sennerby, Lars" sort="Sennerby, Lars" uniqKey="Sennerby L" first="Lars" last="Sennerby">Lars Sennerby</name><affiliation><mods:affiliation>Chairman, Craniofacial Division Department of Biomaterials/Handicap Research, Institute for Surgical Sciences, Gothenburg University, Gothenburg, Sweden</mods:affiliation></affiliation></author><author><name sortKey="Becker, Burton E" sort="Becker, Burton E" uniqKey="Becker B" first="Burton E." last="Becker">Burton E. Becker</name><affiliation><mods:affiliation>Private Practice, Tucson, Arizona</mods:affiliation></affiliation><affiliation><mods:affiliation>E-mail: Branebill@AOL.com</mods:affiliation></affiliation></author><author><name sortKey="Henry, Patrick" sort="Henry, Patrick" uniqKey="Henry P" first="Patrick" last="Henry">Patrick Henry</name><affiliation><mods:affiliation>Private Practice, Perth, Australia</mods:affiliation></affiliation></author></titleStmt><publicationStmt><idno type="wicri:source">ISTEX</idno><idno type="RBID">ISTEX:F3F16B756576E88C58816756FA7BCDD0CF9897EC</idno><date when="2002" year="2002">2002</date><idno type="doi">10.1111/j.1708-8208.2002.tb00151.x</idno><idno type="url">https://api.istex.fr/document/F3F16B756576E88C58816756FA7BCDD0CF9897EC/fulltext/pdf</idno><idno type="wicri:Area/Istex/Corpus">007895</idno><idno type="wicri:explorRef" wicri:stream="Istex" wicri:step="Corpus" wicri:corpus="ISTEX">007895</idno></publicationStmt><sourceDesc><biblStruct><analytic><title level="a" type="main">Clinical and Histologic Findings for Microimplants Placed in One Stage and Loaded for Three Months: A Case Report</title><author><name sortKey="Becker, William" sort="Becker, William" uniqKey="Becker W" first="William" last="Becker">William Becker</name><affiliation><mods:affiliation>Private Practice, Tucson, Arizona, Clinical Professor, Department of Periodontology, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, California; Affiliate Professor, Department of Graduate Periodontics, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington</mods:affiliation></affiliation></author><author><name sortKey="Sennerby, Lars" sort="Sennerby, Lars" uniqKey="Sennerby L" first="Lars" last="Sennerby">Lars Sennerby</name><affiliation><mods:affiliation>Chairman, Craniofacial Division Department of Biomaterials/Handicap Research, Institute for Surgical Sciences, Gothenburg University, Gothenburg, Sweden</mods:affiliation></affiliation></author><author><name sortKey="Becker, Burton E" sort="Becker, Burton E" uniqKey="Becker B" first="Burton E." last="Becker">Burton E. Becker</name><affiliation><mods:affiliation>Private Practice, Tucson, Arizona</mods:affiliation></affiliation><affiliation><mods:affiliation>E-mail: Branebill@AOL.com</mods:affiliation></affiliation></author><author><name sortKey="Henry, Patrick" sort="Henry, Patrick" uniqKey="Henry P" first="Patrick" last="Henry">Patrick Henry</name><affiliation><mods:affiliation>Private Practice, Perth, Australia</mods:affiliation></affiliation></author></analytic><monogr></monogr><series><title level="j" type="main">Clinical Implant Dentistry and Related Research</title><title level="j" type="alt">CLINICAL IMPLANT DENTISTRY RELATED RESEARCH</title><idno type="ISSN">1523-0899</idno><idno type="eISSN">1708-8208</idno><imprint><biblScope unit="vol">4</biblScope><biblScope unit="issue">1</biblScope><biblScope unit="page" from="47">47</biblScope><biblScope unit="page" to="52">52</biblScope><biblScope unit="page-count">6</biblScope><publisher>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</publisher><pubPlace>Oxford, UK</pubPlace><date type="published" when="2002-01">2002-01</date></imprint><idno type="ISSN">1523-0899</idno></series></biblStruct></sourceDesc><seriesStmt><idno type="ISSN">1523-0899</idno></seriesStmt></fileDesc><profileDesc><textClass><keywords scheme="KwdEn" xml:lang="en"><term>Additional microimplants</term><term>Anterior region</term><term>Becker</term><term>Bone resorption</term><term>Brinemark</term><term>Brinemark implants</term><term>Case report</term><term>Clin</term><term>Clinical study</term><term>Denture</term><term>Direct contact</term><term>Edentulous</term><term>Edentulous mandible</term><term>Ericsson</term><term>Excellent contact</term><term>Highest percentage</term><term>Histologic</term><term>Histologic examination</term><term>Histologic findings</term><term>Implant</term><term>Implant placement</term><term>Implant sites</term><term>Intimate contact</term><term>Keratinized</term><term>Keratinized mucosa</term><term>Light microradiogram</term><term>Mandibular</term><term>Marginal bone resorption</term><term>Microimplant</term><term>Microimplants</term><term>Microradiogram</term><term>Nonaxially</term><term>Nonsubmerged titanium implants</term><term>Oral maxillofac implants</term><term>Osseointegrated</term><term>Osseointegrated implants</term><term>Preoperative panogram</term><term>Private practice</term><term>Prospective multicenter study</term><term>Resorption</term><term>Same specimen</term><term>Second thread</term><term>Standard implants</term><term>Titanium</term></keywords><keywords scheme="Teeft" xml:lang="en"><term>Additional microimplants</term><term>Anterior region</term><term>Becker</term><term>Bone resorption</term><term>Brinemark</term><term>Brinemark implants</term><term>Case report</term><term>Clin</term><term>Clinical study</term><term>Denture</term><term>Direct contact</term><term>Edentulous</term><term>Edentulous mandible</term><term>Ericsson</term><term>Excellent contact</term><term>Highest percentage</term><term>Histologic</term><term>Histologic examination</term><term>Histologic findings</term><term>Implant</term><term>Implant placement</term><term>Implant sites</term><term>Intimate contact</term><term>Keratinized</term><term>Keratinized mucosa</term><term>Light microradiogram</term><term>Mandibular</term><term>Marginal bone resorption</term><term>Microimplant</term><term>Microimplants</term><term>Microradiogram</term><term>Nonaxially</term><term>Nonsubmerged titanium implants</term><term>Oral maxillofac implants</term><term>Osseointegrated</term><term>Osseointegrated implants</term><term>Preoperative panogram</term><term>Private practice</term><term>Prospective multicenter study</term><term>Resorption</term><term>Same specimen</term><term>Second thread</term><term>Standard implants</term><term>Titanium</term></keywords></textClass></profileDesc></teiHeader><front><div type="abstract" xml:lang="en">Background: Implants are placed in either one or two stages. There is an absence of histologic human evidence relating to implant integration after loading. Purpose: The purpose of this case report was to present clinical and histologic findings for smooth‐surfaced titanium turned microimplants placed in one stage and loaded after healing. Materials and Methods: Five one‐piece microimplants were placed in a fully edentulous mandible. Three microimplants (tests) were placed in one stage and extended through the keratinized mucosa for 3 mm. Two additional microimplants (controls) were placed even with the mucosa. After 3 months of healing, three test implants were loaded for an additional 3 months. At this time, three loaded implants and one control were removed en bloc. Results: Histologic and histometric evaluations were made. For all specimens, there was excellent bone‐to‐implant contact. The loaded implants had from two to four exposed threads. Using marginal bone levels as the reference, the highest percentage of bone‐to‐implant contact was noted with the unloaded control implant (92.2%). One nonaxially loaded implant had 66.9% bone‐to‐implant contact, whereas the axially loaded implants (n = 2) had 77.8% bone‐to‐implant contact. Conclusions: Within the limits of this case report, smooth‐surfaced, titanium threaded microimplants placed in one stage and loaded for 3 months demonstrated excellent osseointegration, with varying bone‐to‐implant contact. The amount of bone‐to‐implant contact may be related to axial implant loading.</div></front></TEI><istex><corpusName>wiley</corpusName><keywords><teeft><json:string>implant</json:string><json:string>microimplants</json:string><json:string>histologic</json:string><json:string>microimplant</json:string><json:string>mandibular</json:string><json:string>microradiogram</json:string><json:string>denture</json:string><json:string>brinemark</json:string><json:string>nonaxially</json:string><json:string>clin</json:string><json:string>becker</json:string><json:string>resorption</json:string><json:string>standard implants</json:string><json:string>excellent contact</json:string><json:string>ericsson</json:string><json:string>keratinized mucosa</json:string><json:string>keratinized</json:string><json:string>osseointegrated</json:string><json:string>case report</json:string><json:string>private practice</json:string><json:string>light microradiogram</json:string><json:string>histologic findings</json:string><json:string>oral maxillofac implants</json:string><json:string>highest percentage</json:string><json:string>edentulous</json:string><json:string>implant sites</json:string><json:string>additional microimplants</json:string><json:string>marginal bone resorption</json:string><json:string>brinemark implants</json:string><json:string>bone resorption</json:string><json:string>second thread</json:string><json:string>preoperative panogram</json:string><json:string>implant placement</json:string><json:string>same specimen</json:string><json:string>direct contact</json:string><json:string>histologic examination</json:string><json:string>clinical study</json:string><json:string>osseointegrated implants</json:string><json:string>prospective multicenter study</json:string><json:string>edentulous mandible</json:string><json:string>anterior region</json:string><json:string>nonsubmerged titanium implants</json:string><json:string>intimate contact</json:string><json:string>titanium</json:string></teeft></keywords><author><json:item><name>William Becker DDS, MSD, OD (hc)</name><affiliations><json:string>Private Practice, Tucson, Arizona, Clinical Professor, Department of Periodontology, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, California; Affiliate Professor, Department of Graduate Periodontics, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington</json:string></affiliations></json:item><json:item><name>Lars Sennerby DDS, PhD</name><affiliations><json:string>Chairman, Craniofacial Division Department of Biomaterials/Handicap Research, Institute for Surgical Sciences, Gothenburg University, Gothenburg, Sweden</json:string></affiliations></json:item><json:item><name>Burton E. Becker DDS</name><affiliations><json:string>Private Practice, Tucson, Arizona</json:string><json:string>E-mail: Branebill@AOL.com</json:string></affiliations></json:item><json:item><name>Patrick Henry DDS, MS</name><affiliations><json:string>Private Practice, Perth, Australia</json:string></affiliations></json:item></author><subject><json:item><lang><json:string>eng</json:string></lang><value>human histology</value></json:item><json:item><lang><json:string>eng</json:string></lang><value>implant loading</value></json:item><json:item><lang><json:string>eng</json:string></lang><value>one‐stage titanium turned microimplants</value></json:item></subject><articleId><json:string>CID47</json:string></articleId><arkIstex>ark:/67375/WNG-C6JXB65K-L</arkIstex><language><json:string>eng</json:string></language><originalGenre><json:string>article</json:string></originalGenre><abstract>Background: Implants are placed in either one or two stages. There is an absence of histologic human evidence relating to implant integration after loading. Purpose: The purpose of this case report was to present clinical and histologic findings for smooth‐surfaced titanium turned microimplants placed in one stage and loaded after healing. Materials and Methods: Five one‐piece microimplants were placed in a fully edentulous mandible. Three microimplants (tests) were placed in one stage and extended through the keratinized mucosa for 3 mm. Two additional microimplants (controls) were placed even with the mucosa. After 3 months of healing, three test implants were loaded for an additional 3 months. At this time, three loaded implants and one control were removed en bloc. Results: Histologic and histometric evaluations were made. For all specimens, there was excellent bone‐to‐implant contact. The loaded implants had from two to four exposed threads. Using marginal bone levels as the reference, the highest percentage of bone‐to‐implant contact was noted with the unloaded control implant (92.2%). One nonaxially loaded implant had 66.9% bone‐to‐implant contact, whereas the axially loaded implants (n = 2) had 77.8% bone‐to‐implant contact. Conclusions: Within the limits of this case report, smooth‐surfaced, titanium threaded microimplants placed in one stage and loaded for 3 months demonstrated excellent osseointegration, with varying bone‐to‐implant contact. The amount of bone‐to‐implant contact may be related to axial implant loading.</abstract><qualityIndicators><score>6.789</score><pdfWordCount>2089</pdfWordCount><pdfCharCount>13134</pdfCharCount><pdfVersion>1.4</pdfVersion><pdfPageCount>6</pdfPageCount><pdfPageSize>576 x 792 pts</pdfPageSize><refBibsNative>true</refBibsNative><abstractWordCount>225</abstractWordCount><abstractCharCount>1555</abstractCharCount><keywordCount>3</keywordCount></qualityIndicators><title>Clinical and Histologic Findings for Microimplants Placed in One Stage and Loaded for Three Months: A Case Report</title><pmid><json:string>11938638</json:string></pmid><genre><json:string>article</json:string></genre><host><title>Clinical Implant Dentistry and Related Research</title><language><json:string>unknown</json:string></language><doi><json:string>10.1111/(ISSN)1708-8208</json:string></doi><issn><json:string>1523-0899</json:string></issn><eissn><json:string>1708-8208</json:string></eissn><publisherId><json:string>CID</json:string></publisherId><volume>4</volume><issue>1</issue><pages><first>47</first><last>52</last><total>6</total></pages><genre><json:string>journal</json:string></genre></host><namedEntities><unitex><date><json:string>2002</json:string><json:string>8139</json:string></date><geogName></geogName><orgName><json:string>Tokuyama Corp., Tokyo, Japan</json:string><json:string>Craniofacial Division Department of Biomaterials/Handicap Research, Institute for Surgical Sciences, Gothenburg University, Gothenburg, Sweden</json:string><json:string>Department of Graduate Periodontics, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington</json:string></orgName><orgName_funder></orgName_funder><orgName_provider></orgName_provider><persName><json:string>D. Implants</json:string><json:string>Patrick Henry</json:string><json:string>Microradiogram</json:string><json:string>K. Clinical</json:string><json:string>Lars Sennerby</json:string><json:string>Burton E. Becker</json:string><json:string>T. Applicability</json:string></persName><placeName><json:string>Germany</json:string><json:string>Australia</json:string><json:string>Perth</json:string><json:string>Tucson</json:string></placeName><ref_url></ref_url><ref_bibl></ref_bibl><bibl></bibl></unitex></namedEntities><ark><json:string>ark:/67375/WNG-C6JXB65K-L</json:string></ark><categories><wos><json:string>1 - science</json:string><json:string>2 - dentistry, oral surgery & medicine</json:string></wos><scienceMetrix><json:string>1 - health sciences</json:string><json:string>2 - clinical medicine</json:string><json:string>3 - dentistry</json:string></scienceMetrix><scopus><json:string>1 - Health Sciences</json:string><json:string>2 - Dentistry</json:string><json:string>3 - General Dentistry</json:string><json:string>1 - Health Sciences</json:string><json:string>2 - Dentistry</json:string><json:string>3 - Oral Surgery</json:string></scopus><inist><json:string>1 - sciences appliquees, technologies et medecines</json:string><json:string>2 - sciences biologiques et medicales</json:string><json:string>3 - sciences medicales</json:string></inist></categories><publicationDate>2002</publicationDate><copyrightDate>2002</copyrightDate><doi><json:string>10.1111/j.1708-8208.2002.tb00151.x</json:string></doi><id>F3F16B756576E88C58816756FA7BCDD0CF9897EC</id><score>1</score><fulltext><json:item><extension>pdf</extension><original>true</original><mimetype>application/pdf</mimetype><uri>https://api.istex.fr/document/F3F16B756576E88C58816756FA7BCDD0CF9897EC/fulltext/pdf</uri></json:item><json:item><extension>zip</extension><original>false</original><mimetype>application/zip</mimetype><uri>https://api.istex.fr/document/F3F16B756576E88C58816756FA7BCDD0CF9897EC/fulltext/zip</uri></json:item><istex:fulltextTEI uri="https://api.istex.fr/document/F3F16B756576E88C58816756FA7BCDD0CF9897EC/fulltext/tei"><teiHeader><fileDesc><titleStmt><title level="a" type="main">Clinical and Histologic Findings for Microimplants Placed in One Stage and Loaded for Three Months: A Case Report</title></titleStmt><publicationStmt><authority>ISTEX</authority><publisher>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</publisher><pubPlace>Oxford, UK</pubPlace><date type="published" when="2002-01"></date></publicationStmt><notesStmt><note type="content-type" subtype="article" source="article" scheme="https://content-type.data.istex.fr/ark:/67375/XTP-6N5SZHKN-D">article</note><note type="publication-type" subtype="journal" scheme="https://publication-type.data.istex.fr/ark:/67375/JMC-0GLKJH51-B">journal</note></notesStmt><sourceDesc><biblStruct type="article"><analytic><title level="a" type="main">Clinical and Histologic Findings for Microimplants Placed in One Stage and Loaded for Three Months: A Case Report</title><author xml:id="author-0000"><persName><forename type="first">William</forename><surname>Becker</surname><roleName type="degree">DDS, MSD, OD (hc)</roleName></persName><affiliation>Private Practice, Tucson, Arizona, Clinical Professor, Department of Periodontology, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, California; Affiliate Professor, Department of Graduate Periodontics, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington</affiliation></author><author xml:id="author-0001"><persName><forename type="first">Lars</forename><surname>Sennerby</surname><roleName type="degree">DDS, PhD</roleName></persName><affiliation>Chairman, Craniofacial Division Department of Biomaterials/Handicap Research, Institute for Surgical Sciences, Gothenburg University, Gothenburg, Sweden<address><country key="SE"></country></address></affiliation></author><author xml:id="author-0002" role="corresp"><persName><forename type="first">Burton E.</forename><surname>Becker</surname><roleName type="degree">DDS</roleName></persName><affiliation>Private Practice, Tucson, Arizona<address><country key="US"></country></address></affiliation><affiliation>Reprint requests: William Becker, DDS, MSD, OD (hc), 801 N Wilmot, B‐2, Tucson, AZ 85711; e‐mail: Branebill@AOL.com</affiliation></author><author xml:id="author-0003"><persName><forename type="first">Patrick</forename><surname>Henry</surname><roleName type="degree">DDS, MS</roleName></persName><affiliation>Private Practice, Perth, Australia<address><country key="AU"></country></address></affiliation></author><idno type="istex">F3F16B756576E88C58816756FA7BCDD0CF9897EC</idno><idno type="ark">ark:/67375/WNG-C6JXB65K-L</idno><idno type="DOI">10.1111/j.1708-8208.2002.tb00151.x</idno><idno type="unit">CID47</idno><idno type="toTypesetVersion">file:CID.CID47.pdf</idno></analytic><monogr><title level="j" type="main">Clinical Implant Dentistry and Related Research</title><title level="j" type="alt">CLINICAL IMPLANT DENTISTRY RELATED RESEARCH</title><idno type="pISSN">1523-0899</idno><idno type="eISSN">1708-8208</idno><idno type="book-DOI">10.1111/(ISSN)1708-8208</idno><idno type="book-part-DOI">10.1111/cid.2002.4.issue-1</idno><idno type="product">CID</idno><idno type="publisherDivision">ST</idno><imprint><biblScope unit="vol">4</biblScope><biblScope unit="issue">1</biblScope><biblScope unit="page" from="47">47</biblScope><biblScope unit="page" to="52">52</biblScope><biblScope unit="page-count">6</biblScope><publisher>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</publisher><pubPlace>Oxford, UK</pubPlace><date type="published" when="2002-01"></date></imprint></monogr></biblStruct></sourceDesc></fileDesc><profileDesc><abstract xml:lang="en" style="main"><head>ABSTRACT</head><p>
<hi rend="italic">Background</hi>: Implants are placed in either one or two stages. There is an absence of histologic human evidence relating to implant integration after loading.</p><p>
<hi rend="italic">Purpose</hi>: The purpose of this case report was to present clinical and histologic findings for smooth‐surfaced titanium turned microimplants placed in one stage and loaded after healing.</p><p>
<hi rend="italic">Materials and Methods</hi>: Five one‐piece microimplants were placed in a fully edentulous mandible. Three microimplants (tests) were placed in one stage and extended through the keratinized mucosa for 3 mm. Two additional microimplants (controls) were placed even with the mucosa. After 3 months of healing, three test implants were loaded for an additional 3 months. At this time, three loaded implants and one control were removed en bloc.</p><p>
<hi rend="italic">Results</hi>: Histologic and histometric evaluations were made. For all specimens, there was excellent bone‐to‐implant contact. The loaded implants had from two to four exposed threads. Using marginal bone levels as the reference, the highest percentage of bone‐to‐implant contact was noted with the unloaded control implant (92.2%). One nonaxially loaded implant had 66.9% bone‐to‐implant contact, whereas the axially loaded implants (n = 2) had 77.8% bone‐to‐implant contact.</p><p>
<hi rend="italic">Conclusions</hi>: Within the limits of this case report, smooth‐surfaced, titanium threaded microimplants placed in one stage and loaded for 3 months demonstrated excellent osseointegration, with varying bone‐to‐implant contact. The amount of bone‐to‐implant contact may be related to axial implant loading.</p></abstract><textClass><keywords xml:lang="en"><term xml:id="k1">human histology</term><term xml:id="k2">implant loading</term><term xml:id="k3">one‐stage titanium turned microimplants</term></keywords></textClass><langUsage><language ident="en"></language></langUsage></profileDesc></teiHeader></istex:fulltextTEI><json:item><extension>txt</extension><original>false</original><mimetype>text/plain</mimetype><uri>https://api.istex.fr/document/F3F16B756576E88C58816756FA7BCDD0CF9897EC/fulltext/txt</uri></json:item></fulltext><metadata><istex:metadataXml wicri:clean="Wiley, elements deleted: body"><istex:xmlDeclaration>version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" standalone="yes"</istex:xmlDeclaration><istex:document><component version="2.0" type="serialArticle" xml:lang="en"><header><publicationMeta level="product"><publisherInfo><publisherName>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</publisherName><publisherLoc>Oxford, UK</publisherLoc></publisherInfo><doi origin="wiley" registered="yes">10.1111/(ISSN)1708-8208</doi><issn type="print">1523-0899</issn><issn type="electronic">1708-8208</issn><idGroup><id type="product" value="CID"></id><id type="publisherDivision" value="ST"></id></idGroup><titleGroup><title type="main" sort="CLINICAL IMPLANT DENTISTRY RELATED RESEARCH">Clinical Implant Dentistry and Related Research</title></titleGroup></publicationMeta><publicationMeta level="part" position="01001"><doi origin="wiley">10.1111/cid.2002.4.issue-1</doi><numberingGroup><numbering type="journalVolume" number="4">4</numbering><numbering type="journalIssue" number="1">1</numbering></numberingGroup><coverDate startDate="2002-01">January 2002</coverDate></publicationMeta><publicationMeta level="unit" type="article" position="0004700" status="forIssue"><doi origin="wiley">10.1111/j.1708-8208.2002.tb00151.x</doi><idGroup><id type="unit" value="CID47"></id></idGroup><countGroup><count type="pageTotal" number="6"></count></countGroup><eventGroup><event type="firstOnline" date="2006-10-30"></event><event type="publishedOnlineFinalForm" date="2006-10-30"></event><event type="xmlConverted" agent="Converter:BPG_TO_WML3G version:2.3.2 mode:FullText source:HeaderRef result:HeaderRef" date="2010-03-13"></event><event type="xmlConverted" agent="Converter:WILEY_ML3G_TO_WILEY_ML3GV2 version:3.8.8" date="2014-01-15"></event><event type="xmlConverted" agent="Converter:WML3G_To_WML3G version:4.1.7 mode:FullText,remove_FC" date="2014-10-16"></event></eventGroup><numberingGroup><numbering type="pageFirst" number="47">47</numbering><numbering type="pageLast" number="52">52</numbering></numberingGroup><correspondenceTo>Reprint requests: William Becker, DDS, MSD, OD (hc), 801 N Wilmot, B‐2, Tucson, AZ 85711; e‐mail: <email>Branebill@AOL.com</email></correspondenceTo><linkGroup><link type="toTypesetVersion" href="file:CID.CID47.pdf"></link></linkGroup></publicationMeta><contentMeta><countGroup><count type="referenceTotal" number="12"></count><count type="linksCrossRef" number="5"></count></countGroup><titleGroup><title type="main">Clinical and Histologic Findings for Microimplants Placed in One Stage and Loaded for Three Months: A Case Report</title></titleGroup><creators><creator creatorRole="author" xml:id="cr1" affiliationRef="#a1"><personName><givenNames>William</givenNames><familyName>Becker</familyName><degrees>DDS, MSD, OD (hc)</degrees></personName></creator><creator creatorRole="author" xml:id="cr2" affiliationRef="#a2"><personName><givenNames>Lars</givenNames><familyName>Sennerby</familyName><degrees>DDS, PhD</degrees></personName></creator><creator creatorRole="author" xml:id="cr3" affiliationRef="#a3" corresponding="yes"><personName><givenNames>Burton E.</givenNames><familyName>Becker</familyName><degrees>DDS</degrees></personName></creator><creator creatorRole="author" xml:id="cr4" affiliationRef="#a4"><personName><givenNames>Patrick</givenNames><familyName>Henry</familyName><degrees>DDS, MS</degrees></personName></creator></creators><affiliationGroup><affiliation xml:id="a1"><unparsedAffiliation>Private Practice, Tucson, Arizona, Clinical Professor, Department of Periodontology, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, California; Affiliate Professor, Department of Graduate Periodontics, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington</unparsedAffiliation></affiliation><affiliation xml:id="a2" countryCode="SE"><unparsedAffiliation>Chairman, Craniofacial Division Department of Biomaterials/Handicap Research, Institute for Surgical Sciences, Gothenburg University, Gothenburg, Sweden</unparsedAffiliation></affiliation><affiliation xml:id="a3" countryCode="US"><unparsedAffiliation>Private Practice, Tucson, Arizona</unparsedAffiliation></affiliation><affiliation xml:id="a4" countryCode="AU"><unparsedAffiliation>Private Practice, Perth, Australia</unparsedAffiliation></affiliation></affiliationGroup><keywordGroup xml:lang="en"><keyword xml:id="k1">human histology</keyword><keyword xml:id="k2">implant loading</keyword><keyword xml:id="k3">one‐stage titanium turned microimplants</keyword></keywordGroup><abstractGroup><abstract type="main" xml:lang="en"><title type="main">ABSTRACT</title><p> <i>Background</i>: Implants are placed in either one or two stages. There is an absence of histologic human evidence relating to implant integration after loading.</p><p> <i>Purpose</i>: The purpose of this case report was to present clinical and histologic findings for smooth‐surfaced titanium turned microimplants placed in one stage and loaded after healing.</p><p> <i>Materials and Methods</i>: Five one‐piece microimplants were placed in a fully edentulous mandible. Three microimplants (tests) were placed in one stage and extended through the keratinized mucosa for 3 mm. Two additional microimplants (controls) were placed even with the mucosa. After 3 months of healing, three test implants were loaded for an additional 3 months. At this time, three loaded implants and one control were removed en bloc.</p><p> <i>Results</i>: Histologic and histometric evaluations were made. For all specimens, there was excellent bone‐to‐implant contact. The loaded implants had from two to four exposed threads. Using marginal bone levels as the reference, the highest percentage of bone‐to‐implant contact was noted with the unloaded control implant (92.2%). One nonaxially loaded implant had 66.9% bone‐to‐implant contact, whereas the axially loaded implants (n = 2) had 77.8% bone‐to‐implant contact.</p><p> <i>Conclusions</i>: Within the limits of this case report, smooth‐surfaced, titanium threaded microimplants placed in one stage and loaded for 3 months demonstrated excellent osseointegration, with varying bone‐to‐implant contact. The amount of bone‐to‐implant contact may be related to axial implant loading.</p></abstract></abstractGroup></contentMeta></header></component></istex:document></istex:metadataXml><mods version="3.6"><titleInfo lang="en"><title>Clinical and Histologic Findings for Microimplants Placed in One Stage and Loaded for Three Months: A Case Report</title></titleInfo><titleInfo type="alternative" contentType="CDATA" lang="en"><title>Clinical and Histologic Findings for Microimplants Placed in One Stage and Loaded for Three Months: A Case Report</title></titleInfo><name type="personal"><namePart type="given">William</namePart><namePart type="family">Becker</namePart><namePart type="termsOfAddress">DDS, MSD, OD (hc)</namePart><affiliation>Private Practice, Tucson, Arizona, Clinical Professor, Department of Periodontology, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, California; Affiliate Professor, Department of Graduate Periodontics, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington</affiliation><role><roleTerm type="text">author</roleTerm></role></name><name type="personal"><namePart type="given">Lars</namePart><namePart type="family">Sennerby</namePart><namePart type="termsOfAddress">DDS, PhD</namePart><affiliation>Chairman, Craniofacial Division Department of Biomaterials/Handicap Research, Institute for Surgical Sciences, Gothenburg University, Gothenburg, Sweden</affiliation><role><roleTerm type="text">author</roleTerm></role></name><name type="personal"><namePart type="given">Burton E.</namePart><namePart type="family">Becker</namePart><namePart type="termsOfAddress">DDS</namePart><affiliation>Private Practice, Tucson, Arizona</affiliation><affiliation>E-mail: Branebill@AOL.com</affiliation><role><roleTerm type="text">author</roleTerm></role></name><name type="personal"><namePart type="given">Patrick</namePart><namePart type="family">Henry</namePart><namePart type="termsOfAddress">DDS, MS</namePart><affiliation>Private Practice, Perth, Australia</affiliation><role><roleTerm type="text">author</roleTerm></role></name><typeOfResource>text</typeOfResource><genre type="article" displayLabel="article" authority="ISTEX" authorityURI="https://content-type.data.istex.fr" valueURI="https://content-type.data.istex.fr/ark:/67375/XTP-6N5SZHKN-D">article</genre><originInfo><publisher>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</publisher><place><placeTerm type="text">Oxford, UK</placeTerm></place><dateIssued encoding="w3cdtf">2002-01</dateIssued><copyrightDate encoding="w3cdtf">2002</copyrightDate></originInfo><language><languageTerm type="code" authority="rfc3066">en</languageTerm><languageTerm type="code" authority="iso639-2b">eng</languageTerm></language><physicalDescription><extent unit="references">12</extent><extent unit="linksCrossRef">5</extent></physicalDescription><abstract lang="en">Background: Implants are placed in either one or two stages. There is an absence of histologic human evidence relating to implant integration after loading. Purpose: The purpose of this case report was to present clinical and histologic findings for smooth‐surfaced titanium turned microimplants placed in one stage and loaded after healing. Materials and Methods: Five one‐piece microimplants were placed in a fully edentulous mandible. Three microimplants (tests) were placed in one stage and extended through the keratinized mucosa for 3 mm. Two additional microimplants (controls) were placed even with the mucosa. After 3 months of healing, three test implants were loaded for an additional 3 months. At this time, three loaded implants and one control were removed en bloc. Results: Histologic and histometric evaluations were made. For all specimens, there was excellent bone‐to‐implant contact. The loaded implants had from two to four exposed threads. Using marginal bone levels as the reference, the highest percentage of bone‐to‐implant contact was noted with the unloaded control implant (92.2%). One nonaxially loaded implant had 66.9% bone‐to‐implant contact, whereas the axially loaded implants (n = 2) had 77.8% bone‐to‐implant contact. Conclusions: Within the limits of this case report, smooth‐surfaced, titanium threaded microimplants placed in one stage and loaded for 3 months demonstrated excellent osseointegration, with varying bone‐to‐implant contact. The amount of bone‐to‐implant contact may be related to axial implant loading.</abstract><subject lang="en"><genre>keywords</genre><topic>human histology</topic><topic>implant loading</topic><topic>one‐stage titanium turned microimplants</topic></subject><relatedItem type="host"><titleInfo><title>Clinical Implant Dentistry and Related Research</title></titleInfo><genre type="journal" authority="ISTEX" authorityURI="https://publication-type.data.istex.fr" valueURI="https://publication-type.data.istex.fr/ark:/67375/JMC-0GLKJH51-B">journal</genre><identifier type="ISSN">1523-0899</identifier><identifier type="eISSN">1708-8208</identifier><identifier type="DOI">10.1111/(ISSN)1708-8208</identifier><identifier type="PublisherID">CID</identifier><part><date>2002</date><detail type="volume"><caption>vol.</caption><number>4</number></detail><detail type="issue"><caption>no.</caption><number>1</number></detail><extent unit="pages"><start>47</start><end>52</end><total>6</total></extent></part></relatedItem><identifier type="istex">F3F16B756576E88C58816756FA7BCDD0CF9897EC</identifier><identifier type="ark">ark:/67375/WNG-C6JXB65K-L</identifier><identifier type="DOI">10.1111/j.1708-8208.2002.tb00151.x</identifier><identifier type="ArticleID">CID47</identifier><recordInfo><recordContentSource authority="ISTEX" authorityURI="https://loaded-corpus.data.istex.fr" valueURI="https://loaded-corpus.data.istex.fr/ark:/67375/XBH-L0C46X92-X">wiley</recordContentSource><recordOrigin>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</recordOrigin></recordInfo></mods><json:item><extension>json</extension><original>false</original><mimetype>application/json</mimetype><uri>https://api.istex.fr/document/F3F16B756576E88C58816756FA7BCDD0CF9897EC/metadata/json</uri></json:item></metadata><serie></serie></istex></record>Pour manipuler ce document sous Unix (Dilib)
EXPLOR_STEP=$WICRI_ROOT/Wicri/Santé/explor/EdenteV2/Data/Istex/Corpus
HfdSelect -h $EXPLOR_STEP/biblio.hfd -nk 007895 | SxmlIndent | more
Ou
HfdSelect -h $EXPLOR_AREA/Data/Istex/Corpus/biblio.hfd -nk 007895 | SxmlIndent | more
Pour mettre un lien sur cette page dans le réseau Wicri
{{Explor lien
|wiki= Wicri/Santé
|area= EdenteV2
|flux= Istex
|étape= Corpus
|type= RBID
|clé= ISTEX:F3F16B756576E88C58816756FA7BCDD0CF9897EC
|texte= Clinical and Histologic Findings for Microimplants Placed in One Stage and Loaded for Three Months: A Case Report
}}
| This area was generated with Dilib version V0.6.32. |  |