Evaluation of speech in patients rehabilitated with various oral implant‐supported prostheses
Identifieur interne : 007817 ( Istex/Corpus ); précédent : 007816; suivant : 007818Evaluation of speech in patients rehabilitated with various oral implant‐supported prostheses
Auteurs : R. Jacobs ; D. Van Steenberghe ; E. Manders ; C. Van Looy ; D. Lembrechts ; I. NaertSource :
- Clinical Oral Implants Research [ 0905-7161 ] ; 2001-04.
English descriptors
- KwdEn :
- Articulation, Clin, Complete dentures, Control group, Control groups, Dentistry, Dentition, Denture, Einer, Experimental group, Full prostheses, Full prosthesis, Gruppe hatte, Haraldson, Hearing loss, Impl, Implant, Implant rehabilitation, Implant treatment, Implants research, Interdental spaces, International journal, Jacobs, Lundqvist, Maxilla, Maxillary, Maxillofacial, Maxillofacial implants, Naert, Natural dentition, Occlusal, Oral function, Oral impl, Oral rehabilitation, Oral status, Oral stereognosis, Pacientes, Pathologist, Patienten, Present study, Pronunciation, Prosthesis, Prosthetic, Prosthetic dentistry, Prosthetic parameters, Prosthetic rehabilitation, Scandinavian journal, Sobre implantes, Speech adaptation, Speech pathologist, Speech performance, Speech problems, Steenberghe, Subgroup, Subgrupo estaba compuesto, Tongue placement, Various subgroups.
- Teeft :
- Articulation, Clin, Complete dentures, Control group, Control groups, Dentistry, Dentition, Denture, Einer, Experimental group, Full prostheses, Full prosthesis, Gruppe hatte, Haraldson, Hearing loss, Impl, Implant, Implant rehabilitation, Implant treatment, Implants research, Interdental spaces, International journal, Jacobs, Lundqvist, Maxilla, Maxillary, Maxillofacial, Maxillofacial implants, Naert, Natural dentition, Occlusal, Oral function, Oral impl, Oral rehabilitation, Oral status, Oral stereognosis, Pacientes, Pathologist, Patienten, Present study, Pronunciation, Prosthesis, Prosthetic, Prosthetic dentistry, Prosthetic parameters, Prosthetic rehabilitation, Scandinavian journal, Sobre implantes, Speech adaptation, Speech pathologist, Speech performance, Speech problems, Steenberghe, Subgroup, Subgrupo estaba compuesto, Tongue placement, Various subgroups.
Abstract
Abstract: In the present study, speech function was assessed in edentulous patients wearing fixed or removable dental prostheses supported or not by oral implants. A total of 138 patients participated in the present research. The experimental group (n=113) was divided in 4 subgroups. Subgroup FD/FFPi comprised 22 patients with a maxillary full denture (=FD) and a mandibular fixed full prosthesis on implants (=FFPi). Subgroup FFPi/ND consisted of 27 patients with a maxillary fixed full prosthesis on implants and a natural dentition (=ND) in the mandible. Subgroup FD/ODi included 49 patients wearing a maxillary full denture and a mandibular overdenture on 2 implants (=ODi). Subgroup FFPi/FFPi comprised 15 patients having a fixed full prosthesis on implants in both jaws. The outcome of the logopedic screening of the experimental group was compared with that of a control group of subjects having a natural dentition (ND/ND; n=25). A standard clinical procedure for evaluation of speech was carried out by a speech pathologist. Besides, specific oral and prosthetic parameters were scored in all patients. It was established that one or more pronunciation difficulties occurred in 84% of the patients of the experimental group. This was significantly more than in the control group, where half the number of subjects had some speech deficiencies. No clear influence of specific oral and prosthetic parameters could be identified. From the present results, it could be concluded that in patients rehabilitated with oral implant‐supported prostheses speech disorder is more frequently observed than in subjects with a natural dentition.
Url:
DOI: 10.1034/j.1600-0501.2001.012002167.x
Links to Exploration step
ISTEX:F281D0671F497F0185D1437A7E4D947851CC4E40Le document en format XML
<record><TEI wicri:istexFullTextTei="biblStruct"><teiHeader><fileDesc><titleStmt><title xml:lang="en">Evaluation of speech in patients rehabilitated with various oral implant‐supported prostheses</title><author><name sortKey="Jacobs, R" sort="Jacobs, R" uniqKey="Jacobs R" first="R." last="Jacobs">R. Jacobs</name><affiliation><mods:affiliation>Department of Periodontology (Laboratory of Oral Physiology)</mods:affiliation></affiliation><affiliation><mods:affiliation>E-mail: reinhilde.jacobs@uz.kuleuven.ac.be</mods:affiliation></affiliation></author><author><name sortKey="Van Steenberghe, D" sort="Van Steenberghe, D" uniqKey="Van Steenberghe D" first="D." last="Van Steenberghe">D. Van Steenberghe</name><affiliation><mods:affiliation>Department of Periodontology (Laboratory of Oral Physiology)</mods:affiliation></affiliation></author><author><name sortKey="Manders, E" sort="Manders, E" uniqKey="Manders E" first="E." last="Manders">E. Manders</name><affiliation><mods:affiliation>Department of Logopedics and Audiology</mods:affiliation></affiliation></author><author><name sortKey="Van Looy, C" sort="Van Looy, C" uniqKey="Van Looy C" first="C." last="Van Looy">C. Van Looy</name><affiliation><mods:affiliation>Department of Logopedics and Audiology</mods:affiliation></affiliation></author><author><name sortKey="Lembrechts, D" sort="Lembrechts, D" uniqKey="Lembrechts D" first="D." last="Lembrechts">D. Lembrechts</name><affiliation><mods:affiliation>Department of Logopedics and Audiology</mods:affiliation></affiliation></author><author><name sortKey="Naert, I" sort="Naert, I" uniqKey="Naert I" first="I." last="Naert">I. Naert</name><affiliation><mods:affiliation>Department of Prosthetic Dentistry, Faculty of Medicine, Catholic University Leuven, Leuven, Belgium</mods:affiliation></affiliation></author></titleStmt><publicationStmt><idno type="wicri:source">ISTEX</idno><idno type="RBID">ISTEX:F281D0671F497F0185D1437A7E4D947851CC4E40</idno><date when="2001" year="2001">2001</date><idno type="doi">10.1034/j.1600-0501.2001.012002167.x</idno><idno type="url">https://api.istex.fr/document/F281D0671F497F0185D1437A7E4D947851CC4E40/fulltext/pdf</idno><idno type="wicri:Area/Istex/Corpus">007817</idno><idno type="wicri:explorRef" wicri:stream="Istex" wicri:step="Corpus" wicri:corpus="ISTEX">007817</idno></publicationStmt><sourceDesc><biblStruct><analytic><title level="a" type="main">Evaluation of speech in patients rehabilitated with various oral implant‐supported prostheses</title><author><name sortKey="Jacobs, R" sort="Jacobs, R" uniqKey="Jacobs R" first="R." last="Jacobs">R. Jacobs</name><affiliation><mods:affiliation>Department of Periodontology (Laboratory of Oral Physiology)</mods:affiliation></affiliation><affiliation><mods:affiliation>E-mail: reinhilde.jacobs@uz.kuleuven.ac.be</mods:affiliation></affiliation></author><author><name sortKey="Van Steenberghe, D" sort="Van Steenberghe, D" uniqKey="Van Steenberghe D" first="D." last="Van Steenberghe">D. Van Steenberghe</name><affiliation><mods:affiliation>Department of Periodontology (Laboratory of Oral Physiology)</mods:affiliation></affiliation></author><author><name sortKey="Manders, E" sort="Manders, E" uniqKey="Manders E" first="E." last="Manders">E. Manders</name><affiliation><mods:affiliation>Department of Logopedics and Audiology</mods:affiliation></affiliation></author><author><name sortKey="Van Looy, C" sort="Van Looy, C" uniqKey="Van Looy C" first="C." last="Van Looy">C. Van Looy</name><affiliation><mods:affiliation>Department of Logopedics and Audiology</mods:affiliation></affiliation></author><author><name sortKey="Lembrechts, D" sort="Lembrechts, D" uniqKey="Lembrechts D" first="D." last="Lembrechts">D. Lembrechts</name><affiliation><mods:affiliation>Department of Logopedics and Audiology</mods:affiliation></affiliation></author><author><name sortKey="Naert, I" sort="Naert, I" uniqKey="Naert I" first="I." last="Naert">I. Naert</name><affiliation><mods:affiliation>Department of Prosthetic Dentistry, Faculty of Medicine, Catholic University Leuven, Leuven, Belgium</mods:affiliation></affiliation></author></analytic><monogr></monogr><series><title level="j" type="main">Clinical Oral Implants Research</title><title level="j" type="alt">CLINICAL ORAL IMPLANTS RESEARCH</title><idno type="ISSN">0905-7161</idno><idno type="eISSN">1600-0501</idno><imprint><biblScope unit="vol">12</biblScope><biblScope unit="issue">2</biblScope><biblScope unit="page" from="167">167</biblScope><biblScope unit="page" to="173">173</biblScope><biblScope unit="page-count">7</biblScope><publisher>Munksgaard International Publishers</publisher><pubPlace>Copenhagen</pubPlace><date type="published" when="2001-04">2001-04</date></imprint><idno type="ISSN">0905-7161</idno></series></biblStruct></sourceDesc><seriesStmt><idno type="ISSN">0905-7161</idno></seriesStmt></fileDesc><profileDesc><textClass><keywords scheme="KwdEn" xml:lang="en"><term>Articulation</term><term>Clin</term><term>Complete dentures</term><term>Control group</term><term>Control groups</term><term>Dentistry</term><term>Dentition</term><term>Denture</term><term>Einer</term><term>Experimental group</term><term>Full prostheses</term><term>Full prosthesis</term><term>Gruppe hatte</term><term>Haraldson</term><term>Hearing loss</term><term>Impl</term><term>Implant</term><term>Implant rehabilitation</term><term>Implant treatment</term><term>Implants research</term><term>Interdental spaces</term><term>International journal</term><term>Jacobs</term><term>Lundqvist</term><term>Maxilla</term><term>Maxillary</term><term>Maxillofacial</term><term>Maxillofacial implants</term><term>Naert</term><term>Natural dentition</term><term>Occlusal</term><term>Oral function</term><term>Oral impl</term><term>Oral rehabilitation</term><term>Oral status</term><term>Oral stereognosis</term><term>Pacientes</term><term>Pathologist</term><term>Patienten</term><term>Present study</term><term>Pronunciation</term><term>Prosthesis</term><term>Prosthetic</term><term>Prosthetic dentistry</term><term>Prosthetic parameters</term><term>Prosthetic rehabilitation</term><term>Scandinavian journal</term><term>Sobre implantes</term><term>Speech adaptation</term><term>Speech pathologist</term><term>Speech performance</term><term>Speech problems</term><term>Steenberghe</term><term>Subgroup</term><term>Subgrupo estaba compuesto</term><term>Tongue placement</term><term>Various subgroups</term></keywords><keywords scheme="Teeft" xml:lang="en"><term>Articulation</term><term>Clin</term><term>Complete dentures</term><term>Control group</term><term>Control groups</term><term>Dentistry</term><term>Dentition</term><term>Denture</term><term>Einer</term><term>Experimental group</term><term>Full prostheses</term><term>Full prosthesis</term><term>Gruppe hatte</term><term>Haraldson</term><term>Hearing loss</term><term>Impl</term><term>Implant</term><term>Implant rehabilitation</term><term>Implant treatment</term><term>Implants research</term><term>Interdental spaces</term><term>International journal</term><term>Jacobs</term><term>Lundqvist</term><term>Maxilla</term><term>Maxillary</term><term>Maxillofacial</term><term>Maxillofacial implants</term><term>Naert</term><term>Natural dentition</term><term>Occlusal</term><term>Oral function</term><term>Oral impl</term><term>Oral rehabilitation</term><term>Oral status</term><term>Oral stereognosis</term><term>Pacientes</term><term>Pathologist</term><term>Patienten</term><term>Present study</term><term>Pronunciation</term><term>Prosthesis</term><term>Prosthetic</term><term>Prosthetic dentistry</term><term>Prosthetic parameters</term><term>Prosthetic rehabilitation</term><term>Scandinavian journal</term><term>Sobre implantes</term><term>Speech adaptation</term><term>Speech pathologist</term><term>Speech performance</term><term>Speech problems</term><term>Steenberghe</term><term>Subgroup</term><term>Subgrupo estaba compuesto</term><term>Tongue placement</term><term>Various subgroups</term></keywords></textClass></profileDesc></teiHeader><front><div type="abstract">Abstract: In the present study, speech function was assessed in edentulous patients wearing fixed or removable dental prostheses supported or not by oral implants. A total of 138 patients participated in the present research. The experimental group (n=113) was divided in 4 subgroups. Subgroup FD/FFPi comprised 22 patients with a maxillary full denture (=FD) and a mandibular fixed full prosthesis on implants (=FFPi). Subgroup FFPi/ND consisted of 27 patients with a maxillary fixed full prosthesis on implants and a natural dentition (=ND) in the mandible. Subgroup FD/ODi included 49 patients wearing a maxillary full denture and a mandibular overdenture on 2 implants (=ODi). Subgroup FFPi/FFPi comprised 15 patients having a fixed full prosthesis on implants in both jaws. The outcome of the logopedic screening of the experimental group was compared with that of a control group of subjects having a natural dentition (ND/ND; n=25). A standard clinical procedure for evaluation of speech was carried out by a speech pathologist. Besides, specific oral and prosthetic parameters were scored in all patients. It was established that one or more pronunciation difficulties occurred in 84% of the patients of the experimental group. This was significantly more than in the control group, where half the number of subjects had some speech deficiencies. No clear influence of specific oral and prosthetic parameters could be identified. From the present results, it could be concluded that in patients rehabilitated with oral implant‐supported prostheses speech disorder is more frequently observed than in subjects with a natural dentition.</div></front></TEI><istex><corpusName>wiley</corpusName><keywords><teeft><json:string>prosthesis</json:string><json:string>implant</json:string><json:string>prosthetic</json:string><json:string>denture</json:string><json:string>speech problems</json:string><json:string>dentition</json:string><json:string>subgroup</json:string><json:string>speech performance</json:string><json:string>pronunciation</json:string><json:string>steenberghe</json:string><json:string>hearing loss</json:string><json:string>full prosthesis</json:string><json:string>lundqvist</json:string><json:string>patienten</json:string><json:string>experimental group</json:string><json:string>haraldson</json:string><json:string>control group</json:string><json:string>pacientes</json:string><json:string>speech pathologist</json:string><json:string>occlusal</json:string><json:string>natural dentition</json:string><json:string>prosthetic dentistry</json:string><json:string>einer</json:string><json:string>maxillofacial implants</json:string><json:string>maxillofacial</json:string><json:string>clin</json:string><json:string>impl</json:string><json:string>maxillary</json:string><json:string>naert</json:string><json:string>oral impl</json:string><json:string>maxilla</json:string><json:string>full prostheses</json:string><json:string>complete dentures</json:string><json:string>international journal</json:string><json:string>implant rehabilitation</json:string><json:string>present study</json:string><json:string>jacobs</json:string><json:string>dentistry</json:string><json:string>speech adaptation</json:string><json:string>implants research</json:string><json:string>control groups</json:string><json:string>oral rehabilitation</json:string><json:string>prosthetic rehabilitation</json:string><json:string>prosthetic parameters</json:string><json:string>gruppe hatte</json:string><json:string>articulation</json:string><json:string>various subgroups</json:string><json:string>oral stereognosis</json:string><json:string>subgrupo estaba compuesto</json:string><json:string>sobre implantes</json:string><json:string>scandinavian journal</json:string><json:string>implant treatment</json:string><json:string>interdental spaces</json:string><json:string>tongue placement</json:string><json:string>oral status</json:string><json:string>oral function</json:string><json:string>pathologist</json:string></teeft></keywords><author><json:item><name>R. Jacobs</name><affiliations><json:string>Department of Periodontology (Laboratory of Oral Physiology)</json:string><json:string>E-mail: reinhilde.jacobs@uz.kuleuven.ac.be</json:string></affiliations></json:item><json:item><name>D. Van Steenberghe</name><affiliations><json:string>Department of Periodontology (Laboratory of Oral Physiology)</json:string></affiliations></json:item><json:item><name>E. Manders</name><affiliations><json:string>Department of Logopedics and Audiology</json:string></affiliations></json:item><json:item><name>C. Van Looy</name><affiliations><json:string>Department of Logopedics and Audiology</json:string></affiliations></json:item><json:item><name>D. Lembrechts</name><affiliations><json:string>Department of Logopedics and Audiology</json:string></affiliations></json:item><json:item><name>I. Naert</name><affiliations><json:string>Department of Prosthetic Dentistry, Faculty of Medicine, Catholic University Leuven, Leuven, Belgium</json:string></affiliations></json:item></author><subject><json:item><lang><json:string>eng</json:string></lang><value>implant</value></json:item><json:item><lang><json:string>eng</json:string></lang><value>oral</value></json:item><json:item><lang><json:string>eng</json:string></lang><value>osseointegration</value></json:item><json:item><lang><json:string>eng</json:string></lang><value>speech</value></json:item><json:item><lang><json:string>eng</json:string></lang><value>phonetics</value></json:item><json:item><lang><json:string>eng</json:string></lang><value>jaw</value></json:item></subject><articleId><json:string>CLR120211</json:string></articleId><arkIstex>ark:/67375/WNG-N20K17F3-S</arkIstex><language><json:string>eng</json:string></language><originalGenre><json:string>article</json:string></originalGenre><abstract>Abstract: In the present study, speech function was assessed in edentulous patients wearing fixed or removable dental prostheses supported or not by oral implants. A total of 138 patients participated in the present research. The experimental group (n=113) was divided in 4 subgroups. Subgroup FD/FFPi comprised 22 patients with a maxillary full denture (=FD) and a mandibular fixed full prosthesis on implants (=FFPi). Subgroup FFPi/ND consisted of 27 patients with a maxillary fixed full prosthesis on implants and a natural dentition (=ND) in the mandible. Subgroup FD/ODi included 49 patients wearing a maxillary full denture and a mandibular overdenture on 2 implants (=ODi). Subgroup FFPi/FFPi comprised 15 patients having a fixed full prosthesis on implants in both jaws. The outcome of the logopedic screening of the experimental group was compared with that of a control group of subjects having a natural dentition (ND/ND; n=25). A standard clinical procedure for evaluation of speech was carried out by a speech pathologist. Besides, specific oral and prosthetic parameters were scored in all patients. It was established that one or more pronunciation difficulties occurred in 84% of the patients of the experimental group. This was significantly more than in the control group, where half the number of subjects had some speech deficiencies. No clear influence of specific oral and prosthetic parameters could be identified. From the present results, it could be concluded that in patients rehabilitated with oral implant‐supported prostheses speech disorder is more frequently observed than in subjects with a natural dentition.</abstract><qualityIndicators><refBibsNative>true</refBibsNative><abstractWordCount>249</abstractWordCount><abstractCharCount>1642</abstractCharCount><keywordCount>6</keywordCount><score>9.813</score><pdfWordCount>4825</pdfWordCount><pdfCharCount>32538</pdfCharCount><pdfVersion>1.2</pdfVersion><pdfPageCount>7</pdfPageCount><pdfPageSize>595 x 794 pts</pdfPageSize></qualityIndicators><title>Evaluation of speech in patients rehabilitated with various oral implant‐supported prostheses</title><pmid><json:string>11251667</json:string></pmid><genre><json:string>article</json:string></genre><host><title>Clinical Oral Implants Research</title><language><json:string>unknown</json:string></language><doi><json:string>10.1111/(ISSN)1600-0501</json:string></doi><issn><json:string>0905-7161</json:string></issn><eissn><json:string>1600-0501</json:string></eissn><publisherId><json:string>CLR</json:string></publisherId><volume>12</volume><issue>2</issue><pages><first>167</first><last>173</last><total>7</total></pages><genre><json:string>journal</json:string></genre></host><namedEntities><unitex><date><json:string>2001</json:string></date><geogName></geogName><orgName><json:string>Belgium Tel</json:string><json:string>Reinhilde Jacobs Department of Periodontology</json:string><json:string>Department of Prosthetic Dentistry, Faculty of Medicine, Catholic University Leuven, Leuven, Belgium</json:string><json:string>Laboratory of Oral Physiology</json:string><json:string>Catholic University</json:string><json:string>Department of Logopedics and Audiology</json:string><json:string>University Hospital KU Leuven</json:string></orgName><orgName_funder></orgName_funder><orgName_provider></orgName_provider><persName><json:string>D. Lembrechts</json:string><json:string>Van Looy</json:string><json:string>R. Jacobs</json:string><json:string>Articulation</json:string><json:string>Subjective</json:string><json:string>D. Evaluation</json:string><json:string>E. Manders</json:string><json:string>C. Van Looy</json:string><json:string>D. van Steenberghe</json:string><json:string>I. Naert</json:string><json:string>Lundqvist</json:string></persName><placeName><json:string>Leuven</json:string><json:string>Belgium</json:string></placeName><ref_url></ref_url><ref_bibl><json:string>Müller et al. 1995</json:string><json:string>Mericske-Stern et al. 1993</json:string><json:string>Naert et al. (1992)</json:string><json:string>Müller & Hasse-Sander 1993</json:string><json:string>Hamlet & Stone 1982</json:string><json:string>Falk et al. 1989</json:string><json:string>Lundqvist et al. 1992b</json:string><json:string>Hardcastle 1976</json:string><json:string>Hamlet et al. 1979</json:string><json:string>Palmer 1979</json:string><json:string>MericskeStern et al. 1993, 1995</json:string><json:string>Ichikawa et al. 1995</json:string><json:string>Jacobs et al</json:string><json:string>Lundqvist et al.</json:string><json:string>Lundqvist et al. (1992b)</json:string><json:string>Jemt et al. 1992</json:string><json:string>Haraldson & Zarb 1988</json:string><json:string>Lundqvist et al. 1992a</json:string><json:string>Lundqvist & Haraldson 1984; Jacobs & van Steenberghe 1991, 1993</json:string><json:string>Saunders & Oliver 1993</json:string><json:string>Chierici et al. 1978</json:string><json:string>Catford 1977</json:string><json:string>Jacobs et al. 1998</json:string><json:string>Haraldson et al. 1979</json:string><json:string>Lundgren et al. 1989</json:string><json:string>Petrovic 1985</json:string><json:string>Jacobs et al. 1997</json:string><json:string>Farley et al. 1998</json:string><json:string>Walton & MacEntee 1993</json:string><json:string>Awad & Feine 1998</json:string></ref_bibl><bibl></bibl></unitex></namedEntities><ark><json:string>ark:/67375/WNG-N20K17F3-S</json:string></ark><categories><wos><json:string>1 - science</json:string><json:string>2 - engineering, biomedical</json:string><json:string>2 - dentistry, oral surgery & medicine</json:string></wos><scienceMetrix><json:string>1 - health sciences</json:string><json:string>2 - clinical medicine</json:string><json:string>3 - dentistry</json:string></scienceMetrix><scopus><json:string>1 - Health Sciences</json:string><json:string>2 - Dentistry</json:string><json:string>3 - Oral Surgery</json:string></scopus></categories><publicationDate>2001</publicationDate><copyrightDate>2001</copyrightDate><doi><json:string>10.1034/j.1600-0501.2001.012002167.x</json:string></doi><id>F281D0671F497F0185D1437A7E4D947851CC4E40</id><score>1</score><fulltext><json:item><extension>pdf</extension><original>true</original><mimetype>application/pdf</mimetype><uri>https://api.istex.fr/document/F281D0671F497F0185D1437A7E4D947851CC4E40/fulltext/pdf</uri></json:item><json:item><extension>zip</extension><original>false</original><mimetype>application/zip</mimetype><uri>https://api.istex.fr/document/F281D0671F497F0185D1437A7E4D947851CC4E40/fulltext/zip</uri></json:item><istex:fulltextTEI uri="https://api.istex.fr/document/F281D0671F497F0185D1437A7E4D947851CC4E40/fulltext/tei"><teiHeader><fileDesc><titleStmt><title level="a" type="main">Evaluation of speech in patients rehabilitated with various oral implant‐supported prostheses</title></titleStmt><publicationStmt><authority>ISTEX</authority><publisher>Munksgaard International Publishers</publisher><pubPlace>Copenhagen</pubPlace><date type="published" when="2001-04"></date></publicationStmt><notesStmt><note type="content-type" subtype="article" source="article" scheme="https://content-type.data.istex.fr/ark:/67375/XTP-6N5SZHKN-D">article</note><note type="publication-type" subtype="journal" scheme="https://publication-type.data.istex.fr/ark:/67375/JMC-0GLKJH51-B">journal</note></notesStmt><sourceDesc><biblStruct type="article"><analytic><title level="a" type="main">Evaluation of speech in patients rehabilitated with various oral implant‐supported prostheses</title><title level="a" type="short">Speech with implant‐supported prostheses</title><author xml:id="author-0000" role="corresp"><persName><forename type="first">R.</forename><surname>Jacobs</surname></persName><affiliation>Department of Periodontology (Laboratory of Oral Physiology)</affiliation><affiliation>*Department of Periodontology
(Laboratory of Oral Physiology), Catholic University Leuven, Kapucijnenvoer 7, B‐3000 Leuven, Belgium
Tel.: +32 16 33 29 51; Fax: +32 16 33 24 84
e‐mail: reinhilde.jacobs@uz.kuleuven.ac.be</affiliation></author><author xml:id="author-0001"><persName><forename type="first">D.</forename><surname>
Steenberghe</surname></persName><affiliation>Department of Periodontology (Laboratory of Oral Physiology)</affiliation><note type="foot">†Holder of the P.‐I. Brånemark Chair in Osseointegration</note></author><author xml:id="author-0002"><persName><forename type="first">E.</forename><surname>Manders</surname></persName><affiliation>Department of Logopedics and Audiology</affiliation></author><author xml:id="author-0003"><persName><forename type="first">C.</forename><surname>
Looy</surname></persName><affiliation>Department of Logopedics and Audiology</affiliation></author><author xml:id="author-0004"><persName><forename type="first">D.</forename><surname>Lembrechts</surname></persName><affiliation>Department of Logopedics and Audiology</affiliation></author><author xml:id="author-0005"><persName><forename type="first">I.</forename><surname>Naert</surname></persName><affiliation>Department of Prosthetic Dentistry, Faculty of Medicine, Catholic University Leuven, Leuven, Belgium<address><country key="BE"></country></address></affiliation></author><idno type="istex">F281D0671F497F0185D1437A7E4D947851CC4E40</idno><idno type="ark">ark:/67375/WNG-N20K17F3-S</idno><idno type="DOI">10.1034/j.1600-0501.2001.012002167.x</idno><idno type="unit">CLR120211</idno><idno type="supplier">clr9o568</idno><idno type="toTypesetVersion">file:CLR.CLR120211.pdf</idno></analytic><monogr><title level="j" type="main">Clinical Oral Implants Research</title><title level="j" type="alt">CLINICAL ORAL IMPLANTS RESEARCH</title><idno type="pISSN">0905-7161</idno><idno type="eISSN">1600-0501</idno><idno type="book-DOI">10.1111/(ISSN)1600-0501</idno><idno type="book-part-DOI">10.1111/clr.2001.12.issue-2</idno><idno type="product">CLR</idno><idno type="publisherDivision">ST</idno><imprint><biblScope unit="vol">12</biblScope><biblScope unit="issue">2</biblScope><biblScope unit="page" from="167">167</biblScope><biblScope unit="page" to="173">173</biblScope><biblScope unit="page-count">7</biblScope><publisher>Munksgaard International Publishers</publisher><pubPlace>Copenhagen</pubPlace><date type="published" when="2001-04"></date></imprint></monogr></biblStruct></sourceDesc></fileDesc><profileDesc><abstract xml:lang="en" style="main"><p><hi rend="bold">Abstract:</hi> In the present study, speech function was assessed in edentulous patients wearing fixed or removable dental prostheses supported or not by oral implants. A total of 138 patients participated in the present research. The experimental group (<hi rend="italic">n</hi>=113) was divided in 4 subgroups. Subgroup FD/FFPi comprised 22 patients with a maxillary full denture (=FD) and a mandibular fixed full prosthesis on implants (=FFPi). Subgroup FFPi/ND consisted of 27 patients with a maxillary fixed full prosthesis on implants and a natural dentition (=ND) in the mandible. Subgroup FD/ODi included 49 patients wearing a maxillary full denture and a mandibular overdenture on 2 implants (=ODi). Subgroup FFPi/FFPi comprised 15 patients having a fixed full prosthesis on implants in both jaws. The outcome of the logopedic screening of the experimental group was compared with that of a control group of subjects having a natural dentition (ND/ND; <hi rend="italic">n</hi>=25). A standard clinical procedure for evaluation of speech was carried out by a speech pathologist. Besides, specific oral and prosthetic parameters were scored in all patients. It was established that one or more pronunciation difficulties occurred in 84% of the patients of the experimental group. This was significantly more than in the control group, where half the number of subjects had some speech deficiencies. No clear influence of specific oral and prosthetic parameters could be identified. From the present results, it could be concluded that in patients rehabilitated with oral implant‐supported prostheses speech disorder is more frequently observed than in subjects with a natural dentition.</p></abstract><abstract xml:lang="fr" style="main"><head>Résumé</head><p>La phonation a étéévaluée chez des patients édentés portant des prothèses dentaires fixes ou amovibles ancrées ou non sur des implants. Cent trente‐huit patients ont participéà cette étude. Le groupe expérimental (<hi rend="italic">n</hi>=113) a été divisé en quatre sous‐groupes: FD/FFPi comprenant 22 patients avec une prothèse supérieure totale (=FD) et une prothèse inférieure totale fixée sur des implants (=FFPi), FPi/ND comprenant 27 patients avec une prothèse supérieure totalte fixée sur des implants et une dentition naturelle dans la mandibule (=ND), le sous‐groupe FD/ODI de 49 patients avec une prothèse totale supérieure et une prothèse inférieure sur deux implants (=ODi) et le sous‐groupe FFPi/FFPi de quinze patients ayant deux bridges sur implants. L’évaluation logopédique du groupe expérimental a été comparée avec celle d’un groupe contrôle de sujets ayant une dentition normale (ND/ND; <hi rend="italic">n</hi>=25). Un processus clinique standardisé pour l’évaluation de la phonation a été effectué par un pathologiste de la phonation. De plus, des paramètres prothétiques et buccaux spécifiques ont été enregistrés chez tous les patients. Une ou plusieurs difficultés de prononciation apparaissaient chez 84% des patients du groupe expérimental. C’était significativement plus élevé que dans le groupe contrôle où la moitié des sujets avaient des déficiences de phonation. Aucune influence claire de paramètres prothétiques ou buccaux spécifiques n’ont pûêtre mis en évidence. Chez les patients ayant reçu des prothèses ancrées sur des implants le problème de phonation est plus souvent observé que chez les sujets ayant une dentition naturelle.</p></abstract><abstract xml:lang="de" style="main"><head>Zusammenfassung</head><p>In dieser Arbeit wurde die Aussprache von zahnlosen Patienten untersucht, die festsitzenden oder abnehmbaren Zahnersatz mit und ohne Implantate tragen. Insgesamt nahmen bei dieser Untersuchung 138 Patienten teil. Die experimentelle Gruppe (<hi rend="italic">n</hi>=113) wurde in 4 Untergruppen aufgeteilt. Die Gruppe FD/FFPi hatte 22 Patienten mit einer Oberkiefertotalprothese (=FD) und einer auf Implantaten befestigten Unterkieferrekonstruktion (=FFPi). Die Gruppe FFPi/ND hatte 27 Patienten mit einer auf Implantaten fixierten Oberkiefer‐rekonstruktion und Eigenbezahnung im Unterkiefer (=ND). Die Gruppe FD/ODi hatte 49 Patienten mit einer Oberkiefertotalprothese und einer Unterkieferhybridprothese auf 2 Implantaten (=ODi). Die Gruppe FFPi/FFPi hatte 15 Patienten mit einer auf Implantaten befestigten Rekonstruktion in beiden Kiefern. Die Ergebnisse der logopädischen Untersuchung in der experimentellen Gruppe wurde mit derjenigen einer Kontrollgruppe verglichen, in welcher alle Patienten eigenbezahnt waren (ND/ND; <hi rend="italic">n</hi>=25). Ein ausgebildeter Pathologe für Logopädie führte ein standartisiertes klinisches Verfahren zur Untersuchung der Sprache durch. Daneben untersuchte man auch bei allen Patienten spezifische orale und prothetische Parameter. Man stellte fest, dass in 84% aller Patienten der experimentellen Gruppen ein oder mehrere Aussprachefehler auftraten. Das war signifikant häufiger als in der Kontrolgruppe, wo etwa die Hälfte aller Patienten leichte Sprachschwierigkeiten hatte. Man konnte keine klaren Einflüsse von spezifischen oralen und prothetischen Parametern identifizieren. Von diesen Resultaten schloss man, dass bei Patienten mit implantatgetragenen Rekonstruktionen Sprachschwierigkeiten häufiger auftreten als bei Patienten mit Eigenbezahnung.</p></abstract><abstract xml:lang="es" style="main"><head>Resumen</head><p>En el presente estudio se valoró la función del habla en pacientes edéntulos que usaban prótesis dentales fijas o removibles soportadas o no por implantes dentales. Un total de 138 pacientes participaron en el presente estudio. El grupo experimental (<hi rend="italic">n</hi>=113) se dividió en 4 subgrupos. El subgrupo FD/FFPi estaba compuesto de 22 pacientes con una dentadura completa maxilar (=FD) y una prótesis completa mandibular fija sobre implantes (=FFPi). El subgrupo FFPi/ND estaba compuesto de 27 pacientes con prótesis completa maxilar fija sobre implantes y una dentición natural (=ND) en la mandíbula. El subgrupo FD/Odi incluyó 49 pacientes que usaban una dentadura completa maxilar y una sobredentadura mandibular sobre dos implantes (=ODi). El subgrupo FFPi/FFPi estaba compuesto por 16 pacientes que tenían una prótesis completa fija sobre implantes en ambos maxilares. Los resultados del screening logopédico del grupo experimental se comparó con el grupo de control de sujetos que tenían una dentición natural (ND/ND; <hi rend="italic">n</hi>=25). Se llevó a cabo un procedimiento clínico estándar para la evaluación del habla por un patólogo logopeda. Por otro lado, se midieron parámetros específicos orales y protésicos en todos los pacientes. Se estableció que una o más dificultades de pronunciación ocurrieron en el 84% de los pacientes del grupo experimental. Esto fue significativamente mayor que en el grupo de control, donde la mitad de los sujetos tuvieron alguna deficiencia del habla. No se identificó ningún parámetro específico oral o protésico de influencia clara. Se los presentes resultados se puede concluir que en pacientes rehabilitados con prótesis implantosoportadas los desordenes del habla son más frecuentemente observados que en sujetos con dentición natural.</p></abstract><textClass><keywords xml:lang="en"><term xml:id="k1">implant</term><term xml:id="k2">oral</term><term xml:id="k3">osseointegration</term><term xml:id="k4">speech</term><term xml:id="k5">phonetics</term><term xml:id="k6">jaw</term></keywords><keywords rend="tocHeading1"><term>Original Articles</term></keywords></textClass><langUsage><language ident="en"></language></langUsage></profileDesc></teiHeader></istex:fulltextTEI><json:item><extension>txt</extension><original>false</original><mimetype>text/plain</mimetype><uri>https://api.istex.fr/document/F281D0671F497F0185D1437A7E4D947851CC4E40/fulltext/txt</uri></json:item></fulltext><metadata><istex:metadataXml wicri:clean="Wiley, elements deleted: body"><istex:xmlDeclaration>version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" standalone="yes"</istex:xmlDeclaration><istex:document><component version="2.0" type="serialArticle" xml:lang="en"><header><publicationMeta level="product"><publisherInfo><publisherName>Munksgaard International Publishers</publisherName><publisherLoc>Copenhagen</publisherLoc></publisherInfo><doi origin="wiley" registered="yes">10.1111/(ISSN)1600-0501</doi><issn type="print">0905-7161</issn><issn type="electronic">1600-0501</issn><idGroup><id type="product" value="CLR"></id><id type="publisherDivision" value="ST"></id></idGroup><titleGroup><title type="main" sort="CLINICAL ORAL IMPLANTS RESEARCH">Clinical Oral Implants Research</title></titleGroup></publicationMeta><publicationMeta level="part" position="04002"><doi origin="wiley">10.1111/clr.2001.12.issue-2</doi><numberingGroup><numbering type="journalVolume" number="12">12</numbering><numbering type="journalIssue" number="2">2</numbering></numberingGroup><coverDate startDate="2001-04">April 2001</coverDate></publicationMeta><publicationMeta level="unit" type="article" position="0016700" status="forIssue"><doi origin="wiley">10.1034/j.1600-0501.2001.012002167.x</doi><idGroup><id type="unit" value="CLR120211"></id><id type="supplier" value="clr9o568"></id></idGroup><countGroup><count type="pageTotal" number="7"></count></countGroup><titleGroup><title type="tocHeading1">Original Articles</title></titleGroup><eventGroup><event type="firstOnline" date="2002-01-19"></event><event type="publishedOnlineFinalForm" date="2002-01-19"></event><event type="xmlConverted" agent="Converter:BPG_TO_WML3G version:2.3.2 mode:FullText source:FullText result:FullText" date="2010-03-15"></event><event type="xmlConverted" agent="Converter:WILEY_ML3G_TO_WILEY_ML3GV2 version:4.0.1" date="2014-03-12"></event><event type="xmlConverted" agent="Converter:WML3G_To_WML3G version:4.1.7 mode:FullText,remove_FC" date="2014-10-16"></event></eventGroup><numberingGroup><numbering type="pageFirst" number="167">167</numbering><numbering type="pageLast" number="173">173</numbering></numberingGroup><correspondenceTo>*Department of Periodontology
(Laboratory of Oral Physiology), Catholic University Leuven, Kapucijnenvoer 7, B‐3000 Leuven, Belgium
Tel.: +32 16 33 29 51; Fax: +32 16 33 24 84
e‐mail: <email>reinhilde.jacobs@uz.kuleuven.ac.be</email></correspondenceTo><linkGroup><link type="toTypesetVersion" href="file:CLR.CLR120211.pdf"></link></linkGroup></publicationMeta><contentMeta><unparsedEditorialHistory><b>Date: </b> Accepted 17 February 2000</unparsedEditorialHistory><countGroup><count type="figureTotal" number="3"></count><count type="tableTotal" number="3"></count><count type="formulaTotal" number="0"></count><count type="referenceTotal" number="39"></count><count type="wordTotal" number="5140"></count><count type="linksPubMed" number="25"></count><count type="linksCrossRef" number="3"></count></countGroup><titleGroup><title type="main">Evaluation of speech in patients rehabilitated with various oral implant‐supported prostheses</title><title type="shortAuthors">Jacobs et al</title><title type="short">Speech with implant‐supported prostheses</title></titleGroup><creators><creator creatorRole="author" xml:id="cr1" affiliationRef="#a1" corresponding="yes"><personName><givenNames>R.</givenNames><familyName>Jacobs</familyName></personName></creator><creator creatorRole="author" xml:id="cr2" affiliationRef="#a1" noteRef="#fn1"><personName><givenNames>D.</givenNames><familyNamePrefix>Van</familyNamePrefix><familyName>
Steenberghe</familyName></personName></creator><creator creatorRole="author" xml:id="cr3" affiliationRef="#a2"><personName><givenNames>E.</givenNames><familyName>Manders</familyName></personName></creator><creator creatorRole="author" xml:id="cr4" affiliationRef="#a2"><personName><givenNames>C.</givenNames><familyNamePrefix>Van </familyNamePrefix><familyName>
Looy</familyName></personName></creator><creator creatorRole="author" xml:id="cr5" affiliationRef="#a2"><personName><givenNames>D.</givenNames><familyName>Lembrechts</familyName></personName></creator><creator creatorRole="author" xml:id="cr6" affiliationRef="#a3"><personName><givenNames>I.</givenNames><familyName>Naert</familyName></personName></creator></creators><affiliationGroup><affiliation xml:id="a1"><unparsedAffiliation>Department of Periodontology (Laboratory of Oral Physiology)</unparsedAffiliation></affiliation><affiliation xml:id="a2"><unparsedAffiliation>Department of Logopedics and Audiology</unparsedAffiliation></affiliation><affiliation xml:id="a3" countryCode="BE"><unparsedAffiliation>Department of Prosthetic Dentistry, Faculty of Medicine, Catholic University Leuven, Leuven, Belgium</unparsedAffiliation></affiliation></affiliationGroup><keywordGroup xml:lang="en"><keyword xml:id="k1">implant</keyword><keyword xml:id="k2">oral</keyword><keyword xml:id="k3">osseointegration</keyword><keyword xml:id="k4">speech</keyword><keyword xml:id="k5">phonetics</keyword><keyword xml:id="k6">jaw</keyword></keywordGroup><abstractGroup><abstract type="main" xml:lang="en"><p><b>Abstract:</b> In the present study, speech function was assessed in edentulous patients wearing fixed or removable dental prostheses supported or not by oral implants. A total of 138 patients participated in the present research. The experimental group (<i>n</i>=113) was divided in 4 subgroups. Subgroup FD/FFPi comprised 22 patients with a maxillary full denture (=FD) and a mandibular fixed full prosthesis on implants (=FFPi). Subgroup FFPi/ND consisted of 27 patients with a maxillary fixed full prosthesis on implants and a natural dentition (=ND) in the mandible. Subgroup FD/ODi included 49 patients wearing a maxillary full denture and a mandibular overdenture on 2 implants (=ODi). Subgroup FFPi/FFPi comprised 15 patients having a fixed full prosthesis on implants in both jaws. The outcome of the logopedic screening of the experimental group was compared with that of a control group of subjects having a natural dentition (ND/ND; <i>n</i>=25). A standard clinical procedure for evaluation of speech was carried out by a speech pathologist. Besides, specific oral and prosthetic parameters were scored in all patients. It was established that one or more pronunciation difficulties occurred in 84% of the patients of the experimental group. This was significantly more than in the control group, where half the number of subjects had some speech deficiencies. No clear influence of specific oral and prosthetic parameters could be identified. From the present results, it could be concluded that in patients rehabilitated with oral implant‐supported prostheses speech disorder is more frequently observed than in subjects with a natural dentition.</p></abstract><abstract type="main" xml:lang="fr"><title type="main">Résumé</title><p>La phonation a étéévaluée chez des patients édentés portant des prothèses dentaires fixes ou amovibles ancrées ou non sur des implants. Cent trente‐huit patients ont participéà cette étude. Le groupe expérimental (<i>n</i>=113) a été divisé en quatre sous‐groupes: FD/FFPi comprenant 22 patients avec une prothèse supérieure totale (=FD) et une prothèse inférieure totale fixée sur des implants (=FFPi), FPi/ND comprenant 27 patients avec une prothèse supérieure totalte fixée sur des implants et une dentition naturelle dans la mandibule (=ND), le sous‐groupe FD/ODI de 49 patients avec une prothèse totale supérieure et une prothèse inférieure sur deux implants (=ODi) et le sous‐groupe FFPi/FFPi de quinze patients ayant deux bridges sur implants. L’évaluation logopédique du groupe expérimental a été comparée avec celle d’un groupe contrôle de sujets ayant une dentition normale (ND/ND; <i>n</i>=25). Un processus clinique standardisé pour l’évaluation de la phonation a été effectué par un pathologiste de la phonation. De plus, des paramètres prothétiques et buccaux spécifiques ont été enregistrés chez tous les patients. Une ou plusieurs difficultés de prononciation apparaissaient chez 84% des patients du groupe expérimental. C’était significativement plus élevé que dans le groupe contrôle où la moitié des sujets avaient des déficiences de phonation. Aucune influence claire de paramètres prothétiques ou buccaux spécifiques n’ont pûêtre mis en évidence. Chez les patients ayant reçu des prothèses ancrées sur des implants le problème de phonation est plus souvent observé que chez les sujets ayant une dentition naturelle.</p></abstract><abstract type="main" xml:lang="de"><title type="main">Zusammenfassung</title><p>In dieser Arbeit wurde die Aussprache von zahnlosen Patienten untersucht, die festsitzenden oder abnehmbaren Zahnersatz mit und ohne Implantate tragen. Insgesamt nahmen bei dieser Untersuchung 138 Patienten teil. Die experimentelle Gruppe (<i>n</i>=113) wurde in 4 Untergruppen aufgeteilt. Die Gruppe FD/FFPi hatte 22 Patienten mit einer Oberkiefertotalprothese (=FD) und einer auf Implantaten befestigten Unterkieferrekonstruktion (=FFPi). Die Gruppe FFPi/ND hatte 27 Patienten mit einer auf Implantaten fixierten Oberkiefer‐rekonstruktion und Eigenbezahnung im Unterkiefer (=ND). Die Gruppe FD/ODi hatte 49 Patienten mit einer Oberkiefertotalprothese und einer Unterkieferhybridprothese auf 2 Implantaten (=ODi). Die Gruppe FFPi/FFPi hatte 15 Patienten mit einer auf Implantaten befestigten Rekonstruktion in beiden Kiefern. Die Ergebnisse der logopädischen Untersuchung in der experimentellen Gruppe wurde mit derjenigen einer Kontrollgruppe verglichen, in welcher alle Patienten eigenbezahnt waren (ND/ND; <i>n</i>=25). Ein ausgebildeter Pathologe für Logopädie führte ein standartisiertes klinisches Verfahren zur Untersuchung der Sprache durch. Daneben untersuchte man auch bei allen Patienten spezifische orale und prothetische Parameter. Man stellte fest, dass in 84% aller Patienten der experimentellen Gruppen ein oder mehrere Aussprachefehler auftraten. Das war signifikant häufiger als in der Kontrolgruppe, wo etwa die Hälfte aller Patienten leichte Sprachschwierigkeiten hatte. Man konnte keine klaren Einflüsse von spezifischen oralen und prothetischen Parametern identifizieren. Von diesen Resultaten schloss man, dass bei Patienten mit implantatgetragenen Rekonstruktionen Sprachschwierigkeiten häufiger auftreten als bei Patienten mit Eigenbezahnung.</p></abstract><abstract type="main" xml:lang="es"><title type="main">Resumen</title><p>En el presente estudio se valoró la función del habla en pacientes edéntulos que usaban prótesis dentales fijas o removibles soportadas o no por implantes dentales. Un total de 138 pacientes participaron en el presente estudio. El grupo experimental (<i>n</i>=113) se dividió en 4 subgrupos. El subgrupo FD/FFPi estaba compuesto de 22 pacientes con una dentadura completa maxilar (=FD) y una prótesis completa mandibular fija sobre implantes (=FFPi). El subgrupo FFPi/ND estaba compuesto de 27 pacientes con prótesis completa maxilar fija sobre implantes y una dentición natural (=ND) en la mandíbula. El subgrupo FD/Odi incluyó 49 pacientes que usaban una dentadura completa maxilar y una sobredentadura mandibular sobre dos implantes (=ODi). El subgrupo FFPi/FFPi estaba compuesto por 16 pacientes que tenían una prótesis completa fija sobre implantes en ambos maxilares. Los resultados del screening logopédico del grupo experimental se comparó con el grupo de control de sujetos que tenían una dentición natural (ND/ND; <i>n</i>=25). Se llevó a cabo un procedimiento clínico estándar para la evaluación del habla por un patólogo logopeda. Por otro lado, se midieron parámetros específicos orales y protésicos en todos los pacientes. Se estableció que una o más dificultades de pronunciación ocurrieron en el 84% de los pacientes del grupo experimental. Esto fue significativamente mayor que en el grupo de control, donde la mitad de los sujetos tuvieron alguna deficiencia del habla. No se identificó ningún parámetro específico oral o protésico de influencia clara. Se los presentes resultados se puede concluir que en pacientes rehabilitados con prótesis implantosoportadas los desordenes del habla son más frecuentemente observados que en sujetos con dentición natural.</p></abstract></abstractGroup></contentMeta><noteGroup><note xml:id="fn1" numbered="no"><p>†Holder of the P.‐I. Brånemark Chair in Osseointegration</p></note></noteGroup></header></component></istex:document></istex:metadataXml><mods version="3.6"><titleInfo lang="en"><title>Evaluation of speech in patients rehabilitated with various oral implant‐supported prostheses</title></titleInfo><titleInfo type="abbreviated" lang="en"><title>Speech with implant‐supported prostheses</title></titleInfo><titleInfo type="alternative" contentType="CDATA" lang="en"><title>Evaluation of speech in patients rehabilitated with various oral implant‐supported prostheses</title></titleInfo><name type="personal"><namePart type="given">R.</namePart><namePart type="family">Jacobs</namePart><affiliation>Department of Periodontology (Laboratory of Oral Physiology)</affiliation><affiliation>E-mail: reinhilde.jacobs@uz.kuleuven.ac.be</affiliation><role><roleTerm type="text">author</roleTerm></role></name><name type="personal"><namePart type="given">D.</namePart><namePart type="family">Van Steenberghe</namePart><affiliation>Department of Periodontology (Laboratory of Oral Physiology)</affiliation><description>†Holder of the P.‐I. Brånemark Chair in Osseointegration</description><role><roleTerm type="text">author</roleTerm></role></name><name type="personal"><namePart type="given">E.</namePart><namePart type="family">Manders</namePart><affiliation>Department of Logopedics and Audiology</affiliation><role><roleTerm type="text">author</roleTerm></role></name><name type="personal"><namePart type="given">C.</namePart><namePart type="family">Van Looy</namePart><affiliation>Department of Logopedics and Audiology</affiliation><role><roleTerm type="text">author</roleTerm></role></name><name type="personal"><namePart type="given">D.</namePart><namePart type="family">Lembrechts</namePart><affiliation>Department of Logopedics and Audiology</affiliation><role><roleTerm type="text">author</roleTerm></role></name><name type="personal"><namePart type="given">I.</namePart><namePart type="family">Naert</namePart><affiliation>Department of Prosthetic Dentistry, Faculty of Medicine, Catholic University Leuven, Leuven, Belgium</affiliation><role><roleTerm type="text">author</roleTerm></role></name><typeOfResource>text</typeOfResource><genre type="article" displayLabel="article" authority="ISTEX" authorityURI="https://content-type.data.istex.fr" valueURI="https://content-type.data.istex.fr/ark:/67375/XTP-6N5SZHKN-D">article</genre><originInfo><publisher>Munksgaard International Publishers</publisher><place><placeTerm type="text">Copenhagen</placeTerm></place><dateIssued encoding="w3cdtf">2001-04</dateIssued><edition>Date: Accepted 17 February 2000</edition><copyrightDate encoding="w3cdtf">2001</copyrightDate></originInfo><language><languageTerm type="code" authority="rfc3066">en</languageTerm><languageTerm type="code" authority="iso639-2b">eng</languageTerm></language><physicalDescription><extent unit="figures">3</extent><extent unit="tables">3</extent><extent unit="formulas">0</extent><extent unit="references">39</extent><extent unit="linksCrossRef">3</extent><extent unit="words">5140</extent></physicalDescription><abstract>Abstract: In the present study, speech function was assessed in edentulous patients wearing fixed or removable dental prostheses supported or not by oral implants. A total of 138 patients participated in the present research. The experimental group (n=113) was divided in 4 subgroups. Subgroup FD/FFPi comprised 22 patients with a maxillary full denture (=FD) and a mandibular fixed full prosthesis on implants (=FFPi). Subgroup FFPi/ND consisted of 27 patients with a maxillary fixed full prosthesis on implants and a natural dentition (=ND) in the mandible. Subgroup FD/ODi included 49 patients wearing a maxillary full denture and a mandibular overdenture on 2 implants (=ODi). Subgroup FFPi/FFPi comprised 15 patients having a fixed full prosthesis on implants in both jaws. The outcome of the logopedic screening of the experimental group was compared with that of a control group of subjects having a natural dentition (ND/ND; n=25). A standard clinical procedure for evaluation of speech was carried out by a speech pathologist. Besides, specific oral and prosthetic parameters were scored in all patients. It was established that one or more pronunciation difficulties occurred in 84% of the patients of the experimental group. This was significantly more than in the control group, where half the number of subjects had some speech deficiencies. No clear influence of specific oral and prosthetic parameters could be identified. From the present results, it could be concluded that in patients rehabilitated with oral implant‐supported prostheses speech disorder is more frequently observed than in subjects with a natural dentition.</abstract><abstract lang="fr">La phonation a étéévaluée chez des patients édentés portant des prothèses dentaires fixes ou amovibles ancrées ou non sur des implants. Cent trente‐huit patients ont participéà cette étude. Le groupe expérimental (n=113) a été divisé en quatre sous‐groupes: FD/FFPi comprenant 22 patients avec une prothèse supérieure totale (=FD) et une prothèse inférieure totale fixée sur des implants (=FFPi), FPi/ND comprenant 27 patients avec une prothèse supérieure totalte fixée sur des implants et une dentition naturelle dans la mandibule (=ND), le sous‐groupe FD/ODI de 49 patients avec une prothèse totale supérieure et une prothèse inférieure sur deux implants (=ODi) et le sous‐groupe FFPi/FFPi de quinze patients ayant deux bridges sur implants. L’évaluation logopédique du groupe expérimental a été comparée avec celle d’un groupe contrôle de sujets ayant une dentition normale (ND/ND; n=25). Un processus clinique standardisé pour l’évaluation de la phonation a été effectué par un pathologiste de la phonation. De plus, des paramètres prothétiques et buccaux spécifiques ont été enregistrés chez tous les patients. Une ou plusieurs difficultés de prononciation apparaissaient chez 84% des patients du groupe expérimental. C’était significativement plus élevé que dans le groupe contrôle où la moitié des sujets avaient des déficiences de phonation. Aucune influence claire de paramètres prothétiques ou buccaux spécifiques n’ont pûêtre mis en évidence. Chez les patients ayant reçu des prothèses ancrées sur des implants le problème de phonation est plus souvent observé que chez les sujets ayant une dentition naturelle.</abstract><abstract lang="de">In dieser Arbeit wurde die Aussprache von zahnlosen Patienten untersucht, die festsitzenden oder abnehmbaren Zahnersatz mit und ohne Implantate tragen. Insgesamt nahmen bei dieser Untersuchung 138 Patienten teil. Die experimentelle Gruppe (n=113) wurde in 4 Untergruppen aufgeteilt. Die Gruppe FD/FFPi hatte 22 Patienten mit einer Oberkiefertotalprothese (=FD) und einer auf Implantaten befestigten Unterkieferrekonstruktion (=FFPi). Die Gruppe FFPi/ND hatte 27 Patienten mit einer auf Implantaten fixierten Oberkiefer‐rekonstruktion und Eigenbezahnung im Unterkiefer (=ND). Die Gruppe FD/ODi hatte 49 Patienten mit einer Oberkiefertotalprothese und einer Unterkieferhybridprothese auf 2 Implantaten (=ODi). Die Gruppe FFPi/FFPi hatte 15 Patienten mit einer auf Implantaten befestigten Rekonstruktion in beiden Kiefern. Die Ergebnisse der logopädischen Untersuchung in der experimentellen Gruppe wurde mit derjenigen einer Kontrollgruppe verglichen, in welcher alle Patienten eigenbezahnt waren (ND/ND; n=25). Ein ausgebildeter Pathologe für Logopädie führte ein standartisiertes klinisches Verfahren zur Untersuchung der Sprache durch. Daneben untersuchte man auch bei allen Patienten spezifische orale und prothetische Parameter. Man stellte fest, dass in 84% aller Patienten der experimentellen Gruppen ein oder mehrere Aussprachefehler auftraten. Das war signifikant häufiger als in der Kontrolgruppe, wo etwa die Hälfte aller Patienten leichte Sprachschwierigkeiten hatte. Man konnte keine klaren Einflüsse von spezifischen oralen und prothetischen Parametern identifizieren. Von diesen Resultaten schloss man, dass bei Patienten mit implantatgetragenen Rekonstruktionen Sprachschwierigkeiten häufiger auftreten als bei Patienten mit Eigenbezahnung.</abstract><abstract lang="es">En el presente estudio se valoró la función del habla en pacientes edéntulos que usaban prótesis dentales fijas o removibles soportadas o no por implantes dentales. Un total de 138 pacientes participaron en el presente estudio. El grupo experimental (n=113) se dividió en 4 subgrupos. El subgrupo FD/FFPi estaba compuesto de 22 pacientes con una dentadura completa maxilar (=FD) y una prótesis completa mandibular fija sobre implantes (=FFPi). El subgrupo FFPi/ND estaba compuesto de 27 pacientes con prótesis completa maxilar fija sobre implantes y una dentición natural (=ND) en la mandíbula. El subgrupo FD/Odi incluyó 49 pacientes que usaban una dentadura completa maxilar y una sobredentadura mandibular sobre dos implantes (=ODi). El subgrupo FFPi/FFPi estaba compuesto por 16 pacientes que tenían una prótesis completa fija sobre implantes en ambos maxilares. Los resultados del screening logopédico del grupo experimental se comparó con el grupo de control de sujetos que tenían una dentición natural (ND/ND; n=25). Se llevó a cabo un procedimiento clínico estándar para la evaluación del habla por un patólogo logopeda. Por otro lado, se midieron parámetros específicos orales y protésicos en todos los pacientes. Se estableció que una o más dificultades de pronunciación ocurrieron en el 84% de los pacientes del grupo experimental. Esto fue significativamente mayor que en el grupo de control, donde la mitad de los sujetos tuvieron alguna deficiencia del habla. No se identificó ningún parámetro específico oral o protésico de influencia clara. Se los presentes resultados se puede concluir que en pacientes rehabilitados con prótesis implantosoportadas los desordenes del habla son más frecuentemente observados que en sujetos con dentición natural.</abstract><subject lang="en"><genre>keywords</genre><topic>implant</topic><topic>oral</topic><topic>osseointegration</topic><topic>speech</topic><topic>phonetics</topic><topic>jaw</topic></subject><relatedItem type="host"><titleInfo><title>Clinical Oral Implants Research</title></titleInfo><genre type="journal" authority="ISTEX" authorityURI="https://publication-type.data.istex.fr" valueURI="https://publication-type.data.istex.fr/ark:/67375/JMC-0GLKJH51-B">journal</genre><identifier type="ISSN">0905-7161</identifier><identifier type="eISSN">1600-0501</identifier><identifier type="DOI">10.1111/(ISSN)1600-0501</identifier><identifier type="PublisherID">CLR</identifier><part><date>2001</date><detail type="volume"><caption>vol.</caption><number>12</number></detail><detail type="issue"><caption>no.</caption><number>2</number></detail><extent unit="pages"><start>167</start><end>173</end><total>7</total></extent></part></relatedItem><identifier type="istex">F281D0671F497F0185D1437A7E4D947851CC4E40</identifier><identifier type="ark">ark:/67375/WNG-N20K17F3-S</identifier><identifier type="DOI">10.1034/j.1600-0501.2001.012002167.x</identifier><identifier type="ArticleID">CLR120211</identifier><recordInfo><recordContentSource authority="ISTEX" authorityURI="https://loaded-corpus.data.istex.fr" valueURI="https://loaded-corpus.data.istex.fr/ark:/67375/XBH-L0C46X92-X">wiley</recordContentSource><recordOrigin>Munksgaard International Publishers</recordOrigin></recordInfo></mods><json:item><extension>json</extension><original>false</original><mimetype>application/json</mimetype><uri>https://api.istex.fr/document/F281D0671F497F0185D1437A7E4D947851CC4E40/metadata/json</uri></json:item></metadata><serie></serie></istex></record>Pour manipuler ce document sous Unix (Dilib)
EXPLOR_STEP=$WICRI_ROOT/Wicri/Santé/explor/EdenteV2/Data/Istex/Corpus
HfdSelect -h $EXPLOR_STEP/biblio.hfd -nk 007817 | SxmlIndent | more
Ou
HfdSelect -h $EXPLOR_AREA/Data/Istex/Corpus/biblio.hfd -nk 007817 | SxmlIndent | more
Pour mettre un lien sur cette page dans le réseau Wicri
{{Explor lien
|wiki= Wicri/Santé
|area= EdenteV2
|flux= Istex
|étape= Corpus
|type= RBID
|clé= ISTEX:F281D0671F497F0185D1437A7E4D947851CC4E40
|texte= Evaluation of speech in patients rehabilitated with various oral implant‐supported prostheses
}}
| This area was generated with Dilib version V0.6.32. |  |