Implant Placement in Combination with Sinus Membrane Elevation without Biomaterials: A 1‐Year Study on 15 Patients
Identifieur interne : 007674 ( Istex/Corpus ); précédent : 007673; suivant : 007675Implant Placement in Combination with Sinus Membrane Elevation without Biomaterials: A 1‐Year Study on 15 Patients
Auteurs : Piero Balleri ; Mario Veltri ; Niccol Nuti ; Marco FerrariSource :
- Clinical Implant Dentistry and Related Research [ 1523-0899 ] ; 2012-10.
English descriptors
- KwdEn :
- Abutment connection, Astra, Astra tech, Astra tech implants, Augmentation, Bevelled margins, Biomaterials, Blast astra tech implants, Bone apposition, Bone formation, Bone reformation, Bone regeneration, Bone regeneration distribution, Bone window, Clin, Clin implant dent relat, Clinical implant dentistry, Coagulum space, Dental implants, Distal aspect, Distal surface, Elevation, Experimental study, Extra costs, Final bone regeneration, Healing period, Implant, Implant aspects, Implant placement, Implant protrusion, Implant surfaces, Maxillary, Maxillary sinus, Maxillary sinus cavity, Membrane, Membrane elevation, Membrane elevation technique, Oral maxillofac surg, Oral pathol, Oral surg, Osteoprogenitor cells, Osteotome sinus, Posterior implants, Posterior maxilla, Present study, Radiol endod, Regenerated bone, Regeneration, Residual, Residual bone, Residual bone height, Residual bone volume, Satisfactory outcome, Schneiderian membrane, Similar results, Simultaneous insertion, Single implants, Sinus, Sinus augmentation, Sinus bone regeneration, Sinus membrane, Sinus membrane elevation, Sinus membrane elevation technique, Surgical, Surgical glue, Surgical technique, Survival rate.
- Teeft :
- Abutment connection, Astra, Astra tech, Astra tech implants, Augmentation, Bevelled margins, Biomaterials, Blast astra tech implants, Bone apposition, Bone formation, Bone reformation, Bone regeneration, Bone regeneration distribution, Bone window, Clin, Clin implant dent relat, Clinical implant dentistry, Coagulum space, Dental implants, Distal aspect, Distal surface, Elevation, Experimental study, Extra costs, Final bone regeneration, Healing period, Implant, Implant aspects, Implant placement, Implant protrusion, Implant surfaces, Maxillary, Maxillary sinus, Maxillary sinus cavity, Membrane, Membrane elevation, Membrane elevation technique, Oral maxillofac surg, Oral pathol, Oral surg, Osteoprogenitor cells, Osteotome sinus, Posterior implants, Posterior maxilla, Present study, Radiol endod, Regenerated bone, Regeneration, Residual, Residual bone, Residual bone height, Residual bone volume, Satisfactory outcome, Schneiderian membrane, Similar results, Simultaneous insertion, Single implants, Sinus, Sinus augmentation, Sinus bone regeneration, Sinus membrane, Sinus membrane elevation, Sinus membrane elevation technique, Surgical, Surgical glue, Surgical technique, Survival rate.
Abstract
Background: Membrane elevation in combination with implant placement without biomaterials is a rather new technique proposed for sinus lifting.
Url:
DOI: 10.1111/j.1708-8208.2010.00318.x
Links to Exploration step
ISTEX:EF98DE90B60457B20036AC179C4D977337EA18A4Le document en format XML
<record><TEI wicri:istexFullTextTei="biblStruct"><teiHeader><fileDesc><titleStmt><title xml:lang="en">Implant Placement in Combination with Sinus Membrane Elevation without Biomaterials: A 1‐Year Study on 15 Patients</title><author><name sortKey="Balleri, Piero" sort="Balleri, Piero" uniqKey="Balleri P" first="Piero" last="Balleri">Piero Balleri</name><affiliation><mods:affiliation>Department of Oral Surgery, University of Siena, Siena, Italy;</mods:affiliation></affiliation><affiliation><mods:affiliation>E-mail: balleri2@unisi.it</mods:affiliation></affiliation></author><author><name sortKey="Veltri, Mario" sort="Veltri, Mario" uniqKey="Veltri M" first="Mario" last="Veltri">Mario Veltri</name><affiliation><mods:affiliation>Department of Oral Surgery, University of Siena, Siena, Italy;</mods:affiliation></affiliation></author><author><name sortKey="Nuti, Niccol" sort="Nuti, Niccol" uniqKey="Nuti N" first="Niccol" last="Nuti">Niccol Nuti</name><affiliation><mods:affiliation>Department of Oral Surgery, University of Siena, Siena, Italy;</mods:affiliation></affiliation></author><author><name sortKey="Ferrari, Marco" sort="Ferrari, Marco" uniqKey="Ferrari M" first="Marco" last="Ferrari">Marco Ferrari</name><affiliation><mods:affiliation>Department of Dental Materials and Fixed Prosthodontics, University of Siena, Siena, Italy</mods:affiliation></affiliation></author></titleStmt><publicationStmt><idno type="wicri:source">ISTEX</idno><idno type="RBID">ISTEX:EF98DE90B60457B20036AC179C4D977337EA18A4</idno><date when="2012" year="2012">2012</date><idno type="doi">10.1111/j.1708-8208.2010.00318.x</idno><idno type="url">https://api.istex.fr/document/EF98DE90B60457B20036AC179C4D977337EA18A4/fulltext/pdf</idno><idno type="wicri:Area/Istex/Corpus">007674</idno><idno type="wicri:explorRef" wicri:stream="Istex" wicri:step="Corpus" wicri:corpus="ISTEX">007674</idno></publicationStmt><sourceDesc><biblStruct><analytic><title level="a" type="main">Implant Placement in Combination with Sinus Membrane Elevation without Biomaterials: A 1‐Year Study on 15 Patients</title><author><name sortKey="Balleri, Piero" sort="Balleri, Piero" uniqKey="Balleri P" first="Piero" last="Balleri">Piero Balleri</name><affiliation><mods:affiliation>Department of Oral Surgery, University of Siena, Siena, Italy;</mods:affiliation></affiliation><affiliation><mods:affiliation>E-mail: balleri2@unisi.it</mods:affiliation></affiliation></author><author><name sortKey="Veltri, Mario" sort="Veltri, Mario" uniqKey="Veltri M" first="Mario" last="Veltri">Mario Veltri</name><affiliation><mods:affiliation>Department of Oral Surgery, University of Siena, Siena, Italy;</mods:affiliation></affiliation></author><author><name sortKey="Nuti, Niccol" sort="Nuti, Niccol" uniqKey="Nuti N" first="Niccol" last="Nuti">Niccol Nuti</name><affiliation><mods:affiliation>Department of Oral Surgery, University of Siena, Siena, Italy;</mods:affiliation></affiliation></author><author><name sortKey="Ferrari, Marco" sort="Ferrari, Marco" uniqKey="Ferrari M" first="Marco" last="Ferrari">Marco Ferrari</name><affiliation><mods:affiliation>Department of Dental Materials and Fixed Prosthodontics, University of Siena, Siena, Italy</mods:affiliation></affiliation></author></analytic><monogr></monogr><series><title level="j" type="main">Clinical Implant Dentistry and Related Research</title><title level="j" type="alt">CLINICAL IMPLANT DENTISTRY RELATED RESEARCH</title><idno type="ISSN">1523-0899</idno><idno type="eISSN">1708-8208</idno><imprint><biblScope unit="vol">14</biblScope><biblScope unit="issue">5</biblScope><biblScope unit="page" from="682">682</biblScope><biblScope unit="page" to="689">689</biblScope><biblScope unit="page-count">8</biblScope><publisher>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</publisher><pubPlace>Oxford, UK</pubPlace><date type="published" when="2012-10">2012-10</date></imprint><idno type="ISSN">1523-0899</idno></series></biblStruct></sourceDesc><seriesStmt><idno type="ISSN">1523-0899</idno></seriesStmt></fileDesc><profileDesc><textClass><keywords scheme="KwdEn" xml:lang="en"><term>Abutment connection</term><term>Astra</term><term>Astra tech</term><term>Astra tech implants</term><term>Augmentation</term><term>Bevelled margins</term><term>Biomaterials</term><term>Blast astra tech implants</term><term>Bone apposition</term><term>Bone formation</term><term>Bone reformation</term><term>Bone regeneration</term><term>Bone regeneration distribution</term><term>Bone window</term><term>Clin</term><term>Clin implant dent relat</term><term>Clinical implant dentistry</term><term>Coagulum space</term><term>Dental implants</term><term>Distal aspect</term><term>Distal surface</term><term>Elevation</term><term>Experimental study</term><term>Extra costs</term><term>Final bone regeneration</term><term>Healing period</term><term>Implant</term><term>Implant aspects</term><term>Implant placement</term><term>Implant protrusion</term><term>Implant surfaces</term><term>Maxillary</term><term>Maxillary sinus</term><term>Maxillary sinus cavity</term><term>Membrane</term><term>Membrane elevation</term><term>Membrane elevation technique</term><term>Oral maxillofac surg</term><term>Oral pathol</term><term>Oral surg</term><term>Osteoprogenitor cells</term><term>Osteotome sinus</term><term>Posterior implants</term><term>Posterior maxilla</term><term>Present study</term><term>Radiol endod</term><term>Regenerated bone</term><term>Regeneration</term><term>Residual</term><term>Residual bone</term><term>Residual bone height</term><term>Residual bone volume</term><term>Satisfactory outcome</term><term>Schneiderian membrane</term><term>Similar results</term><term>Simultaneous insertion</term><term>Single implants</term><term>Sinus</term><term>Sinus augmentation</term><term>Sinus bone regeneration</term><term>Sinus membrane</term><term>Sinus membrane elevation</term><term>Sinus membrane elevation technique</term><term>Surgical</term><term>Surgical glue</term><term>Surgical technique</term><term>Survival rate</term></keywords><keywords scheme="Teeft" xml:lang="en"><term>Abutment connection</term><term>Astra</term><term>Astra tech</term><term>Astra tech implants</term><term>Augmentation</term><term>Bevelled margins</term><term>Biomaterials</term><term>Blast astra tech implants</term><term>Bone apposition</term><term>Bone formation</term><term>Bone reformation</term><term>Bone regeneration</term><term>Bone regeneration distribution</term><term>Bone window</term><term>Clin</term><term>Clin implant dent relat</term><term>Clinical implant dentistry</term><term>Coagulum space</term><term>Dental implants</term><term>Distal aspect</term><term>Distal surface</term><term>Elevation</term><term>Experimental study</term><term>Extra costs</term><term>Final bone regeneration</term><term>Healing period</term><term>Implant</term><term>Implant aspects</term><term>Implant placement</term><term>Implant protrusion</term><term>Implant surfaces</term><term>Maxillary</term><term>Maxillary sinus</term><term>Maxillary sinus cavity</term><term>Membrane</term><term>Membrane elevation</term><term>Membrane elevation technique</term><term>Oral maxillofac surg</term><term>Oral pathol</term><term>Oral surg</term><term>Osteoprogenitor cells</term><term>Osteotome sinus</term><term>Posterior implants</term><term>Posterior maxilla</term><term>Present study</term><term>Radiol endod</term><term>Regenerated bone</term><term>Regeneration</term><term>Residual</term><term>Residual bone</term><term>Residual bone height</term><term>Residual bone volume</term><term>Satisfactory outcome</term><term>Schneiderian membrane</term><term>Similar results</term><term>Simultaneous insertion</term><term>Single implants</term><term>Sinus</term><term>Sinus augmentation</term><term>Sinus bone regeneration</term><term>Sinus membrane</term><term>Sinus membrane elevation</term><term>Sinus membrane elevation technique</term><term>Surgical</term><term>Surgical glue</term><term>Surgical technique</term><term>Survival rate</term></keywords></textClass></profileDesc></teiHeader><front><div type="abstract">Background: Membrane elevation in combination with implant placement without biomaterials is a rather new technique proposed for sinus lifting.</div></front></TEI><istex><corpusName>wiley</corpusName><keywords><teeft><json:string>implant</json:string><json:string>sinus</json:string><json:string>sinus membrane elevation</json:string><json:string>regeneration</json:string><json:string>implant placement</json:string><json:string>maxillary</json:string><json:string>bone regeneration</json:string><json:string>bone formation</json:string><json:string>biomaterials</json:string><json:string>residual</json:string><json:string>augmentation</json:string><json:string>clin</json:string><json:string>single implants</json:string><json:string>bone reformation</json:string><json:string>surgical technique</json:string><json:string>residual bone height</json:string><json:string>bone window</json:string><json:string>dental implants</json:string><json:string>present study</json:string><json:string>regenerated bone</json:string><json:string>sinus membrane</json:string><json:string>distal aspect</json:string><json:string>maxillary sinus</json:string><json:string>membrane</json:string><json:string>surgical</json:string><json:string>elevation</json:string><json:string>abutment connection</json:string><json:string>clin implant dent relat</json:string><json:string>residual bone</json:string><json:string>distal surface</json:string><json:string>astra</json:string><json:string>implant aspects</json:string><json:string>sinus membrane elevation technique</json:string><json:string>radiol endod</json:string><json:string>oral surg</json:string><json:string>membrane elevation</json:string><json:string>astra tech implants</json:string><json:string>oral maxillofac surg</json:string><json:string>oral pathol</json:string><json:string>posterior implants</json:string><json:string>clinical implant dentistry</json:string><json:string>membrane elevation technique</json:string><json:string>implant surfaces</json:string><json:string>final bone regeneration</json:string><json:string>schneiderian membrane</json:string><json:string>osteoprogenitor cells</json:string><json:string>surgical glue</json:string><json:string>implant protrusion</json:string><json:string>blast astra tech implants</json:string><json:string>posterior maxilla</json:string><json:string>osteotome sinus</json:string><json:string>coagulum space</json:string><json:string>similar results</json:string><json:string>bone apposition</json:string><json:string>sinus bone regeneration</json:string><json:string>satisfactory outcome</json:string><json:string>bone regeneration distribution</json:string><json:string>astra tech</json:string><json:string>bevelled margins</json:string><json:string>simultaneous insertion</json:string><json:string>experimental study</json:string><json:string>survival rate</json:string><json:string>residual bone volume</json:string><json:string>extra costs</json:string><json:string>healing period</json:string><json:string>sinus augmentation</json:string><json:string>maxillary sinus cavity</json:string></teeft></keywords><author><json:item><name>Piero Balleri MD, DDS</name><affiliations><json:string>Department of Oral Surgery, University of Siena, Siena, Italy;</json:string><json:string>E-mail: balleri2@unisi.it</json:string></affiliations></json:item><json:item><name>Mario Veltri DDS, PhD</name><affiliations><json:string>Department of Oral Surgery, University of Siena, Siena, Italy;</json:string></affiliations></json:item><json:item><name>Niccolò Nuti DDS</name><affiliations><json:string>Department of Oral Surgery, University of Siena, Siena, Italy;</json:string></affiliations></json:item><json:item><name>Marco Ferrari MD, DDS, PhD</name><affiliations><json:string>Department of Dental Materials and Fixed Prosthodontics, University of Siena, Siena, Italy</json:string></affiliations></json:item></author><subject><json:item><lang><json:string>eng</json:string></lang><value>bone reformation</value></json:item><json:item><lang><json:string>eng</json:string></lang><value>minimal intervention</value></json:item><json:item><lang><json:string>eng</json:string></lang><value>sinus membrane</value></json:item></subject><articleId><json:string>CID318</json:string></articleId><arkIstex>ark:/67375/WNG-F5TGQ7G8-X</arkIstex><language><json:string>eng</json:string></language><originalGenre><json:string>article</json:string></originalGenre><abstract>Background: Membrane elevation in combination with implant placement without biomaterials is a rather new technique proposed for sinus lifting.</abstract><qualityIndicators><score>5.923</score><pdfWordCount>3695</pdfWordCount><pdfCharCount>23335</pdfCharCount><pdfVersion>1.3</pdfVersion><pdfPageCount>8</pdfPageCount><pdfPageSize>585 x 783 pts</pdfPageSize><refBibsNative>true</refBibsNative><abstractWordCount>19</abstractWordCount><abstractCharCount>143</abstractCharCount><keywordCount>3</keywordCount></qualityIndicators><title>Implant Placement in Combination with Sinus Membrane Elevation without Biomaterials: A 1‐Year Study on 15 Patients</title><pmid><json:string>21176096</json:string></pmid><genre><json:string>article</json:string></genre><host><title>Clinical Implant Dentistry and Related Research</title><language><json:string>unknown</json:string></language><doi><json:string>10.1111/(ISSN)1708-8208</json:string></doi><issn><json:string>1523-0899</json:string></issn><eissn><json:string>1708-8208</json:string></eissn><publisherId><json:string>CID</json:string></publisherId><volume>14</volume><issue>5</issue><pages><first>682</first><last>689</last><total>8</total></pages><genre><json:string>journal</json:string></genre></host><namedEntities><unitex><date><json:string>2012</json:string><json:string>from January 2007 to February 2008</json:string></date><geogName></geogName><orgName><json:string>Wiley Periodicals, Inc.</json:string><json:string>Ethicon Inc</json:string><json:string>Italy Reprint</json:string><json:string>Related Research, Volume</json:string><json:string>University of Siena</json:string><json:string>Università</json:string><json:string>Department of Dental Materials and Fixed Prosthodontics</json:string></orgName><orgName_funder></orgName_funder><orgName_provider></orgName_provider><persName><json:string>Thor</json:string><json:string>Mario Veltri</json:string><json:string>Lundgren</json:string><json:string>Marco Ferrari</json:string><json:string>Piero Balleri</json:string></persName><placeName><json:string>Cesena</json:string><json:string>Switzerland</json:string><json:string>Lucca</json:string><json:string>Somerville</json:string><json:string>Milan</json:string><json:string>USA</json:string><json:string>NJ</json:string><json:string>Italy</json:string><json:string>Sweden</json:string></placeName><ref_url><json:string>http://rsb.info.nih.gov/ij/</json:string></ref_url><ref_bibl></ref_bibl><bibl></bibl></unitex></namedEntities><ark><json:string>ark:/67375/WNG-F5TGQ7G8-X</json:string></ark><categories><wos><json:string>1 - science</json:string><json:string>2 - dentistry, oral surgery & medicine</json:string></wos><scienceMetrix><json:string>1 - health sciences</json:string><json:string>2 - clinical medicine</json:string><json:string>3 - dentistry</json:string></scienceMetrix><scopus><json:string>1 - Health Sciences</json:string><json:string>2 - Dentistry</json:string><json:string>3 - General Dentistry</json:string><json:string>1 - Health Sciences</json:string><json:string>2 - Dentistry</json:string><json:string>3 - Oral Surgery</json:string></scopus></categories><publicationDate>2012</publicationDate><copyrightDate>2012</copyrightDate><doi><json:string>10.1111/j.1708-8208.2010.00318.x</json:string></doi><id>EF98DE90B60457B20036AC179C4D977337EA18A4</id><score>1</score><fulltext><json:item><extension>pdf</extension><original>true</original><mimetype>application/pdf</mimetype><uri>https://api.istex.fr/document/EF98DE90B60457B20036AC179C4D977337EA18A4/fulltext/pdf</uri></json:item><json:item><extension>zip</extension><original>false</original><mimetype>application/zip</mimetype><uri>https://api.istex.fr/document/EF98DE90B60457B20036AC179C4D977337EA18A4/fulltext/zip</uri></json:item><istex:fulltextTEI uri="https://api.istex.fr/document/EF98DE90B60457B20036AC179C4D977337EA18A4/fulltext/tei"><teiHeader><fileDesc><titleStmt><title level="a" type="main">Implant Placement in Combination with Sinus Membrane Elevation without Biomaterials: A 1‐Year Study on 15 Patients</title></titleStmt><publicationStmt><authority>ISTEX</authority><publisher>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</publisher><pubPlace>Oxford, UK</pubPlace><availability><licence>© 2010 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.</licence></availability><date type="published" when="2012-10"></date></publicationStmt><notesStmt><note type="content-type" subtype="article" source="article" scheme="https://content-type.data.istex.fr/ark:/67375/XTP-6N5SZHKN-D">article</note><note type="publication-type" subtype="journal" scheme="https://publication-type.data.istex.fr/ark:/67375/JMC-0GLKJH51-B">journal</note></notesStmt><sourceDesc><biblStruct type="article"><analytic><title level="a" type="main">Implant Placement in Combination with Sinus Membrane Elevation without Biomaterials: A 1‐Year Study on 15 Patients</title><title level="a" type="short">Implant Placement in Combination with Sinus Membrane Elevation without Biomaterials</title><author xml:id="author-0000" role="corresp"><persName><forename type="first">Piero</forename><surname>Balleri</surname><roleName type="degree">MD, DDS</roleName></persName><affiliation>Department of Oral Surgery, University of Siena, Siena, Italy;<address><country key="IT"></country></address></affiliation><affiliation>Prof Piero Balleri, Università di Siena, Dipartimento di Scienze Odontostomatologiche, Policlinico “Le Scotte” V.le Bracci 53100 Siena, Italy; e‐mail: balleri2@unisi.it</affiliation></author><author xml:id="author-0001"><persName><forename type="first">Mario</forename><surname>Veltri</surname><roleName type="degree">DDS, PhD</roleName></persName><affiliation>Department of Oral Surgery, University of Siena, Siena, Italy;<address><country key="IT"></country></address></affiliation></author><author xml:id="author-0002"><persName><forename type="first">Niccolò</forename><surname>Nuti</surname><roleName type="degree">DDS</roleName></persName><affiliation>Department of Oral Surgery, University of Siena, Siena, Italy;<address><country key="IT"></country></address></affiliation></author><author xml:id="author-0003"><persName><forename type="first">Marco</forename><surname>Ferrari</surname><roleName type="degree">MD, DDS, PhD</roleName></persName><affiliation>Department of Dental Materials and Fixed Prosthodontics, University of Siena, Siena, Italy<address><country key="IT"></country></address></affiliation></author><idno type="istex">EF98DE90B60457B20036AC179C4D977337EA18A4</idno><idno type="ark">ark:/67375/WNG-F5TGQ7G8-X</idno><idno type="DOI">10.1111/j.1708-8208.2010.00318.x</idno><idno type="unit">CID318</idno><idno type="toTypesetVersion">file:CID.CID318.pdf</idno></analytic><monogr><title level="j" type="main">Clinical Implant Dentistry and Related Research</title><title level="j" type="alt">CLINICAL IMPLANT DENTISTRY RELATED RESEARCH</title><idno type="pISSN">1523-0899</idno><idno type="eISSN">1708-8208</idno><idno type="book-DOI">10.1111/(ISSN)1708-8208</idno><idno type="book-part-DOI">10.1111/cid.2012.14.issue-5</idno><idno type="product">CID</idno><idno type="publisherDivision">ST</idno><imprint><biblScope unit="vol">14</biblScope><biblScope unit="issue">5</biblScope><biblScope unit="page" from="682">682</biblScope><biblScope unit="page" to="689">689</biblScope><biblScope unit="page-count">8</biblScope><publisher>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</publisher><pubPlace>Oxford, UK</pubPlace><date type="published" when="2012-10"></date></imprint></monogr></biblStruct></sourceDesc></fileDesc><profileDesc><abstract xml:lang="en" style="main"><head>ABSTRACT</head><p><hi rend="bold">Background:</hi> Membrane elevation in combination with implant placement without biomaterials is a rather new technique proposed for sinus lifting.</p><p><hi rend="bold">Purpose:</hi> This study assessed the clinical outcome of such technique during the first year of loading.</p><p><hi rend="bold">Material and Methods:</hi> Fifteen patients with a mean residual bone height of 6.2 mm were consecutively recruited for sinus lifting. After opening a replaceable bone window, the membrane was dissected from the sinus walls. A total of 28 implants were placed in the residual crest and they kept the membrane lifted upwards. After window repositioning, the flap was sutured. A 6‐month healing period was allowed. Patients were re‐examined after 12 months of loading.</p><p><hi rend="bold">Results:</hi> All the implants survived at the end of the follow‐up. The 5.5 mm mean bone reformation was significantly lower than the 8.2 mm mean membrane lift achieved after implant placement. Regeneration at the distal surface of the most posterior implants was significantly less than at other aspects. The height of membrane lift was not correlated with the amount of regenerated bone.</p><p><hi rend="bold">Conclusions:</hi> All of the 28 implants placed in combination with sinus membrane elevation were stable during the first year of loading. No extra costs for biomaterial or morbidity for bone harvesting were necessary.</p></abstract><textClass><keywords xml:lang="en"><term xml:id="k1">bone reformation</term><term xml:id="k2">minimal intervention</term><term xml:id="k3">sinus membrane</term></keywords><keywords rend="tocHeading1"><term>ARTICLES</term></keywords></textClass><langUsage><language ident="en"></language></langUsage></profileDesc></teiHeader></istex:fulltextTEI><json:item><extension>txt</extension><original>false</original><mimetype>text/plain</mimetype><uri>https://api.istex.fr/document/EF98DE90B60457B20036AC179C4D977337EA18A4/fulltext/txt</uri></json:item></fulltext><metadata><istex:metadataXml wicri:clean="Wiley, elements deleted: body"><istex:xmlDeclaration>version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" standalone="yes"</istex:xmlDeclaration><istex:document><component version="2.0" type="serialArticle" xml:lang="en"><header><publicationMeta level="product"><publisherInfo><publisherName>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</publisherName><publisherLoc>Oxford, UK</publisherLoc></publisherInfo><doi origin="wiley" registered="yes">10.1111/(ISSN)1708-8208</doi><issn type="print">1523-0899</issn><issn type="electronic">1708-8208</issn><idGroup><id type="product" value="CID"></id><id type="publisherDivision" value="ST"></id></idGroup><titleGroup><title type="main" sort="CLINICAL IMPLANT DENTISTRY RELATED RESEARCH">Clinical Implant Dentistry and Related Research</title></titleGroup></publicationMeta><publicationMeta level="part" position="10105"><doi origin="wiley">10.1111/cid.2012.14.issue-5</doi><numberingGroup><numbering type="journalVolume" number="14">14</numbering><numbering type="journalIssue" number="5">5</numbering></numberingGroup><coverDate startDate="2012-10">October 2012</coverDate></publicationMeta><publicationMeta level="unit" type="article" position="6" status="forIssue"><doi origin="wiley">10.1111/j.1708-8208.2010.00318.x</doi><idGroup><id type="unit" value="CID318"></id></idGroup><countGroup><count type="pageTotal" number="8"></count></countGroup><titleGroup><title type="tocHeading1">ARTICLES</title></titleGroup><copyright>© 2010 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.</copyright><eventGroup><event type="xmlConverted" agent="Converter:BPG_TO_WML3G version:3.2.2 mode:FullText" date="2013-05-06"></event><event type="publishedOnlineEarlyUnpaginated" date="2010-12-22"></event><event type="publishedOnlineFinalForm" date="2012-10-01"></event><event type="firstOnline" date="2010-12-22"></event><event type="xmlConverted" agent="Converter:WILEY_ML3G_TO_WILEY_ML3GV2 version:3.8.8" date="2014-01-15"></event><event type="xmlConverted" agent="Converter:WML3G_To_WML3G version:4.3.4 mode:FullText" date="2015-02-25"></event></eventGroup><numberingGroup><numbering type="pageFirst" number="682">682</numbering><numbering type="pageLast" number="689">689</numbering></numberingGroup><correspondenceTo>Prof Piero Balleri, Università di Siena, Dipartimento di Scienze Odontostomatologiche, Policlinico “Le Scotte” V.le Bracci 53100 Siena, Italy; e‐mail: <email>balleri2@unisi.it</email></correspondenceTo><linkGroup><link type="toTypesetVersion" href="file:CID.CID318.pdf"></link></linkGroup></publicationMeta><contentMeta><countGroup><count type="figureTotal" number="5"></count><count type="tableTotal" number="2"></count><count type="formulaTotal" number="0"></count><count type="referenceTotal" number="21"></count><count type="wordTotal" number="4273"></count><count type="linksPubMed" number="0"></count><count type="linksCrossRef" number="0"></count></countGroup><titleGroup><title type="main">Implant Placement in Combination with Sinus Membrane Elevation without Biomaterials: A 1‐Year Study on 15 Patients</title><title type="shortAuthors">Clinical Implant Dentistry and Related Research, Volume *, Number *, 2010</title><title type="short">Implant Placement in Combination with Sinus Membrane Elevation without Biomaterials</title></titleGroup><creators><creator creatorRole="author" xml:id="cr1" affiliationRef="#a1" corresponding="yes"><personName><givenNames>Piero</givenNames><familyName>Balleri</familyName><degrees>MD, DDS</degrees></personName></creator><creator creatorRole="author" xml:id="cr2" affiliationRef="#a1"><personName><givenNames>Mario</givenNames><familyName>Veltri</familyName><degrees>DDS, PhD</degrees></personName></creator><creator creatorRole="author" xml:id="cr3" affiliationRef="#a1"><personName><givenNames>Niccolò</givenNames><familyName>Nuti</familyName><degrees>DDS</degrees></personName></creator><creator creatorRole="author" xml:id="cr4" affiliationRef="#a2"><personName><givenNames>Marco</givenNames><familyName>Ferrari</familyName><degrees>MD, DDS, PhD</degrees></personName></creator></creators><affiliationGroup><affiliation xml:id="a1" countryCode="IT"><unparsedAffiliation>Department of Oral Surgery, University of Siena, Siena, Italy;</unparsedAffiliation></affiliation><affiliation xml:id="a2" countryCode="IT"><unparsedAffiliation>Department of Dental Materials and Fixed Prosthodontics, University of Siena, Siena, Italy</unparsedAffiliation></affiliation></affiliationGroup><keywordGroup xml:lang="en"><keyword xml:id="k1">bone reformation</keyword><keyword xml:id="k2">minimal intervention</keyword><keyword xml:id="k3">sinus membrane</keyword></keywordGroup><abstractGroup><abstract type="main" xml:lang="en"><title type="main">ABSTRACT</title><p><b>Background:</b> Membrane elevation in combination with implant placement without biomaterials is a rather new technique proposed for sinus lifting.</p><p><b>Purpose:</b> This study assessed the clinical outcome of such technique during the first year of loading.</p><p><b>Material and Methods:</b> Fifteen patients with a mean residual bone height of 6.2 mm were consecutively recruited for sinus lifting. After opening a replaceable bone window, the membrane was dissected from the sinus walls. A total of 28 implants were placed in the residual crest and they kept the membrane lifted upwards. After window repositioning, the flap was sutured. A 6‐month healing period was allowed. Patients were re‐examined after 12 months of loading.</p><p><b>Results:</b> All the implants survived at the end of the follow‐up. The 5.5 mm mean bone reformation was significantly lower than the 8.2 mm mean membrane lift achieved after implant placement. Regeneration at the distal surface of the most posterior implants was significantly less than at other aspects. The height of membrane lift was not correlated with the amount of regenerated bone.</p><p><b>Conclusions:</b> All of the 28 implants placed in combination with sinus membrane elevation were stable during the first year of loading. No extra costs for biomaterial or morbidity for bone harvesting were necessary.</p></abstract></abstractGroup></contentMeta></header></component></istex:document></istex:metadataXml><mods version="3.6"><titleInfo lang="en"><title>Implant Placement in Combination with Sinus Membrane Elevation without Biomaterials: A 1‐Year Study on 15 Patients</title></titleInfo><titleInfo type="abbreviated" lang="en"><title>Implant Placement in Combination with Sinus Membrane Elevation without Biomaterials</title></titleInfo><titleInfo type="alternative" contentType="CDATA" lang="en"><title>Implant Placement in Combination with Sinus Membrane Elevation without Biomaterials: A 1‐Year Study on 15 Patients</title></titleInfo><name type="personal"><namePart type="given">Piero</namePart><namePart type="family">Balleri</namePart><namePart type="termsOfAddress">MD, DDS</namePart><affiliation>Department of Oral Surgery, University of Siena, Siena, Italy;</affiliation><affiliation>E-mail: balleri2@unisi.it</affiliation><role><roleTerm type="text">author</roleTerm></role></name><name type="personal"><namePart type="given">Mario</namePart><namePart type="family">Veltri</namePart><namePart type="termsOfAddress">DDS, PhD</namePart><affiliation>Department of Oral Surgery, University of Siena, Siena, Italy;</affiliation><role><roleTerm type="text">author</roleTerm></role></name><name type="personal"><namePart type="given">Niccolò</namePart><namePart type="family">Nuti</namePart><namePart type="termsOfAddress">DDS</namePart><affiliation>Department of Oral Surgery, University of Siena, Siena, Italy;</affiliation><role><roleTerm type="text">author</roleTerm></role></name><name type="personal"><namePart type="given">Marco</namePart><namePart type="family">Ferrari</namePart><namePart type="termsOfAddress">MD, DDS, PhD</namePart><affiliation>Department of Dental Materials and Fixed Prosthodontics, University of Siena, Siena, Italy</affiliation><role><roleTerm type="text">author</roleTerm></role></name><typeOfResource>text</typeOfResource><genre type="article" displayLabel="article" authority="ISTEX" authorityURI="https://content-type.data.istex.fr" valueURI="https://content-type.data.istex.fr/ark:/67375/XTP-6N5SZHKN-D">article</genre><originInfo><publisher>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</publisher><place><placeTerm type="text">Oxford, UK</placeTerm></place><dateIssued encoding="w3cdtf">2012-10</dateIssued><copyrightDate encoding="w3cdtf">2012</copyrightDate></originInfo><language><languageTerm type="code" authority="rfc3066">en</languageTerm><languageTerm type="code" authority="iso639-2b">eng</languageTerm></language><physicalDescription><extent unit="figures">5</extent><extent unit="tables">2</extent><extent unit="formulas">0</extent><extent unit="references">21</extent><extent unit="linksCrossRef">0</extent><extent unit="words">4273</extent></physicalDescription><abstract>Background: Membrane elevation in combination with implant placement without biomaterials is a rather new technique proposed for sinus lifting.</abstract><abstract>Purpose: This study assessed the clinical outcome of such technique during the first year of loading.</abstract><abstract>Material and Methods: Fifteen patients with a mean residual bone height of 6.2 mm were consecutively recruited for sinus lifting. After opening a replaceable bone window, the membrane was dissected from the sinus walls. A total of 28 implants were placed in the residual crest and they kept the membrane lifted upwards. After window repositioning, the flap was sutured. A 6‐month healing period was allowed. Patients were re‐examined after 12 months of loading.</abstract><abstract>Results: All the implants survived at the end of the follow‐up. The 5.5 mm mean bone reformation was significantly lower than the 8.2 mm mean membrane lift achieved after implant placement. Regeneration at the distal surface of the most posterior implants was significantly less than at other aspects. The height of membrane lift was not correlated with the amount of regenerated bone.</abstract><abstract>Conclusions: All of the 28 implants placed in combination with sinus membrane elevation were stable during the first year of loading. No extra costs for biomaterial or morbidity for bone harvesting were necessary.</abstract><subject lang="en"><genre>keywords</genre><topic>bone reformation</topic><topic>minimal intervention</topic><topic>sinus membrane</topic></subject><relatedItem type="host"><titleInfo><title>Clinical Implant Dentistry and Related Research</title></titleInfo><genre type="journal" authority="ISTEX" authorityURI="https://publication-type.data.istex.fr" valueURI="https://publication-type.data.istex.fr/ark:/67375/JMC-0GLKJH51-B">journal</genre><identifier type="ISSN">1523-0899</identifier><identifier type="eISSN">1708-8208</identifier><identifier type="DOI">10.1111/(ISSN)1708-8208</identifier><identifier type="PublisherID">CID</identifier><part><date>2012</date><detail type="volume"><caption>vol.</caption><number>14</number></detail><detail type="issue"><caption>no.</caption><number>5</number></detail><extent unit="pages"><start>682</start><end>689</end><total>8</total></extent></part></relatedItem><identifier type="istex">EF98DE90B60457B20036AC179C4D977337EA18A4</identifier><identifier type="ark">ark:/67375/WNG-F5TGQ7G8-X</identifier><identifier type="DOI">10.1111/j.1708-8208.2010.00318.x</identifier><identifier type="ArticleID">CID318</identifier><accessCondition type="use and reproduction" contentType="copyright">© 2010 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.</accessCondition><recordInfo><recordContentSource authority="ISTEX" authorityURI="https://loaded-corpus.data.istex.fr" valueURI="https://loaded-corpus.data.istex.fr/ark:/67375/XBH-L0C46X92-X">wiley</recordContentSource><recordOrigin>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</recordOrigin></recordInfo></mods><json:item><extension>json</extension><original>false</original><mimetype>application/json</mimetype><uri>https://api.istex.fr/document/EF98DE90B60457B20036AC179C4D977337EA18A4/metadata/json</uri></json:item></metadata><serie></serie></istex></record>Pour manipuler ce document sous Unix (Dilib)
EXPLOR_STEP=$WICRI_ROOT/Wicri/Santé/explor/EdenteV2/Data/Istex/Corpus
HfdSelect -h $EXPLOR_STEP/biblio.hfd -nk 007674 | SxmlIndent | more
Ou
HfdSelect -h $EXPLOR_AREA/Data/Istex/Corpus/biblio.hfd -nk 007674 | SxmlIndent | more
Pour mettre un lien sur cette page dans le réseau Wicri
{{Explor lien
|wiki= Wicri/Santé
|area= EdenteV2
|flux= Istex
|étape= Corpus
|type= RBID
|clé= ISTEX:EF98DE90B60457B20036AC179C4D977337EA18A4
|texte= Implant Placement in Combination with Sinus Membrane Elevation without Biomaterials: A 1‐Year Study on 15 Patients
}}
| This area was generated with Dilib version V0.6.32. |  |