EdenteV2, Istex, Corpus, bibRecord, 007503

The effect of implant design on insertion torque and immediate micromotion

Identifieur interne : 007503 ( Istex/Corpus ); précédent : 007502; suivant : 007504

The effect of implant design on insertion torque and immediate micromotion

Auteurs : Amilcar C. Freitas Jr ; Estevam A. Bonfante ; Gabriela Giro ; Malvin N. Janal ; Paulo G. Coelho

Source :

Clinical Oral Implants Research [ 0905-7161 ] ; 2012-01.

RBID : ISTEX:EC39636305F2417AEDCECF86F319CCC048434ADA

English descriptors

KwdEn :
- Astm standards, Biomechanical aspects, Biomedical materials research, Blossomt, Blossomt design, Blossomt group, Blossomt implants, Bone density, Cadaver, Clinical implant dentistry, Coelho, Contact endoscopy, Dental implants, Dentistry, Different implant designs, Different macrodesigns, Digital force gauge, Digital micrometer, Digital torque gauge, Fastest rate, Foam block, Foam blocks, Force gauge, Freitas, Groove design, Grouping factor, Groups note, Homogeneous groups, Horizontal displacement, Human cadaver bone, Human cadaver study, Identical thread design, Immediate loading, Immediate micromotion, Implant, Implant dentistry, Implant design, Implant design effect, Implant design group, Implant designs, Implant integration, Implant macrodesigns, Implant macrogeometry, Implant micromotion, Implant placement, Implant stability, Implants research, Insertion, Insertion torque, Insertion torque values, Intermediate rate, International journal, John wiley sons, Lateral, Lateral force, Least insertion torque, Lesser insertion torque, Linear effect, Linear effects, Linear slope, Lowest insertion torque values, Maxillofacial surgery, Micromotion, Model anova, Null hypothesis, Oral impl, Oral maxillofacial implants, Present study, Primary stability, Randomized analysis, Removal torque, Resonance frequency analysis, Scandinavian journal, Several studies, Single implant crowns, Standard deviation, Statistical comparison, Thread design, Thread pitch, Torque, Torque capacity, Trisi, Uted, Uted design, Uted implants.
Teeft :
- Astm standards, Biomechanical aspects, Biomedical materials research, Blossomt, Blossomt design, Blossomt group, Blossomt implants, Bone density, Cadaver, Clinical implant dentistry, Coelho, Contact endoscopy, Dental implants, Dentistry, Different implant designs, Different macrodesigns, Digital force gauge, Digital micrometer, Digital torque gauge, Fastest rate, Foam block, Foam blocks, Force gauge, Freitas, Groove design, Grouping factor, Groups note, Homogeneous groups, Horizontal displacement, Human cadaver bone, Human cadaver study, Identical thread design, Immediate loading, Immediate micromotion, Implant, Implant dentistry, Implant design, Implant design effect, Implant design group, Implant designs, Implant integration, Implant macrodesigns, Implant macrogeometry, Implant micromotion, Implant placement, Implant stability, Implants research, Insertion, Insertion torque, Insertion torque values, Intermediate rate, International journal, John wiley sons, Lateral, Lateral force, Least insertion torque, Lesser insertion torque, Linear effect, Linear effects, Linear slope, Lowest insertion torque values, Maxillofacial surgery, Micromotion, Model anova, Null hypothesis, Oral impl, Oral maxillofacial implants, Present study, Primary stability, Randomized analysis, Removal torque, Resonance frequency analysis, Scandinavian journal, Several studies, Single implant crowns, Standard deviation, Statistical comparison, Thread design, Thread pitch, Torque, Torque capacity, Trisi, Uted, Uted design, Uted implants.

Abstract

Objectives: To evaluate the effect of insertion torque on micromotion to a lateral force in three different implant designs.

Url:

https://api.istex.fr/document/EC39636305F2417AEDCECF86F319CCC048434ADA/fulltext/pdf

DOI: 10.1111/j.1600-0501.2010.02142.x

Links to Exploration step

ISTEX:EC39636305F2417AEDCECF86F319CCC048434ADA

Le document en format XML

<record><TEI wicri:istexFullTextTei="biblStruct"><teiHeader><fileDesc><titleStmt><title xml:lang="en">The effect of implant design on insertion torque and immediate micromotion</title>
<author><name sortKey="Freitas Jr, Amilcar C" sort="Freitas Jr, Amilcar C" uniqKey="Freitas Jr A" first="Amilcar C." last="Freitas Jr">Amilcar C. Freitas Jr</name>
<affiliation><mods:affiliation>Department of Biomaterials and Biomimetics, New York University, New York, NY, USA</mods:affiliation>
</affiliation>
</author>
<author><name sortKey="Bonfante, Estevam A" sort="Bonfante, Estevam A" uniqKey="Bonfante E" first="Estevam A." last="Bonfante">Estevam A. Bonfante</name>
<affiliation><mods:affiliation>Department of Prosthodontics, University of São Paulo, Bauru School of Dentistry, Bauru, SP, Brazil</mods:affiliation>
</affiliation>
</author>
<author><name sortKey="Giro, Gabriela" sort="Giro, Gabriela" uniqKey="Giro G" first="Gabriela" last="Giro">Gabriela Giro</name>
<affiliation><mods:affiliation>Department of Oral Diagnosis and Surgery, Faculdade de Odontologia de Araraquara, Universidade Estadual Paulista Júlio de Mesquita Filho, Araraquara, SP, Brazil</mods:affiliation>
</affiliation>
</author>
<author><name sortKey="Janal, Malvin N" sort="Janal, Malvin N" uniqKey="Janal M" first="Malvin N." last="Janal">Malvin N. Janal</name>
<affiliation><mods:affiliation>Department of Epidemiology and Health Promotion, New York University College of Dentistry, New York, NY, USA</mods:affiliation>
</affiliation>
</author>
<author><name sortKey="Coelho, Paulo G" sort="Coelho, Paulo G" uniqKey="Coelho P" first="Paulo G." last="Coelho">Paulo G. Coelho</name>
<affiliation><mods:affiliation>Department of Biomaterials and Biomimetics, New York University, New York, NY, USA</mods:affiliation>
</affiliation>
</author>
</titleStmt>
<publicationStmt><idno type="wicri:source">ISTEX</idno>
<idno type="RBID">ISTEX:EC39636305F2417AEDCECF86F319CCC048434ADA</idno>
<date when="2012" year="2012">2012</date>
<idno type="doi">10.1111/j.1600-0501.2010.02142.x</idno>
<idno type="url">https://api.istex.fr/document/EC39636305F2417AEDCECF86F319CCC048434ADA/fulltext/pdf</idno>
<idno type="wicri:Area/Istex/Corpus">007503</idno>
<idno type="wicri:explorRef" wicri:stream="Istex" wicri:step="Corpus" wicri:corpus="ISTEX">007503</idno>
</publicationStmt>
<sourceDesc><biblStruct><analytic><title level="a" type="main">The effect of implant design on insertion torque and immediate micromotion</title>
<author><name sortKey="Freitas Jr, Amilcar C" sort="Freitas Jr, Amilcar C" uniqKey="Freitas Jr A" first="Amilcar C." last="Freitas Jr">Amilcar C. Freitas Jr</name>
<affiliation><mods:affiliation>Department of Biomaterials and Biomimetics, New York University, New York, NY, USA</mods:affiliation>
</affiliation>
</author>
<author><name sortKey="Bonfante, Estevam A" sort="Bonfante, Estevam A" uniqKey="Bonfante E" first="Estevam A." last="Bonfante">Estevam A. Bonfante</name>
<affiliation><mods:affiliation>Department of Prosthodontics, University of São Paulo, Bauru School of Dentistry, Bauru, SP, Brazil</mods:affiliation>
</affiliation>
</author>
<author><name sortKey="Giro, Gabriela" sort="Giro, Gabriela" uniqKey="Giro G" first="Gabriela" last="Giro">Gabriela Giro</name>
<affiliation><mods:affiliation>Department of Oral Diagnosis and Surgery, Faculdade de Odontologia de Araraquara, Universidade Estadual Paulista Júlio de Mesquita Filho, Araraquara, SP, Brazil</mods:affiliation>
</affiliation>
</author>
<author><name sortKey="Janal, Malvin N" sort="Janal, Malvin N" uniqKey="Janal M" first="Malvin N." last="Janal">Malvin N. Janal</name>
<affiliation><mods:affiliation>Department of Epidemiology and Health Promotion, New York University College of Dentistry, New York, NY, USA</mods:affiliation>
</affiliation>
</author>
<author><name sortKey="Coelho, Paulo G" sort="Coelho, Paulo G" uniqKey="Coelho P" first="Paulo G." last="Coelho">Paulo G. Coelho</name>
<affiliation><mods:affiliation>Department of Biomaterials and Biomimetics, New York University, New York, NY, USA</mods:affiliation>
</affiliation>
</author>
</analytic>
<monogr></monogr>
<series><title level="j" type="main">Clinical Oral Implants Research</title>
<title level="j" type="alt">CLINICAL ORAL IMPLANTS RESEARCH</title>
<idno type="ISSN">0905-7161</idno>
<idno type="eISSN">1600-0501</idno>
<imprint><biblScope unit="vol">23</biblScope>
<biblScope unit="issue">1</biblScope>
<biblScope unit="page" from="113">113</biblScope>
<biblScope unit="page" to="118">118</biblScope>
<biblScope unit="page-count">6</biblScope>
<publisher>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</publisher>
<pubPlace>Oxford, UK</pubPlace>
<date type="published" when="2012-01">2012-01</date>
</imprint>
<idno type="ISSN">0905-7161</idno>
</series>
</biblStruct>
</sourceDesc>
<seriesStmt><idno type="ISSN">0905-7161</idno>
</seriesStmt>
</fileDesc>
<profileDesc><textClass><keywords scheme="KwdEn" xml:lang="en"><term>Astm standards</term>
<term>Biomechanical aspects</term>
<term>Biomedical materials research</term>
<term>Blossomt</term>
<term>Blossomt design</term>
<term>Blossomt group</term>
<term>Blossomt implants</term>
<term>Bone density</term>
<term>Cadaver</term>
<term>Clinical implant dentistry</term>
<term>Coelho</term>
<term>Contact endoscopy</term>
<term>Dental implants</term>
<term>Dentistry</term>
<term>Different implant designs</term>
<term>Different macrodesigns</term>
<term>Digital force gauge</term>
<term>Digital micrometer</term>
<term>Digital torque gauge</term>
<term>Fastest rate</term>
<term>Foam block</term>
<term>Foam blocks</term>
<term>Force gauge</term>
<term>Freitas</term>
<term>Groove design</term>
<term>Grouping factor</term>
<term>Groups note</term>
<term>Homogeneous groups</term>
<term>Horizontal displacement</term>
<term>Human cadaver bone</term>
<term>Human cadaver study</term>
<term>Identical thread design</term>
<term>Immediate loading</term>
<term>Immediate micromotion</term>
<term>Implant</term>
<term>Implant dentistry</term>
<term>Implant design</term>
<term>Implant design effect</term>
<term>Implant design group</term>
<term>Implant designs</term>
<term>Implant integration</term>
<term>Implant macrodesigns</term>
<term>Implant macrogeometry</term>
<term>Implant micromotion</term>
<term>Implant placement</term>
<term>Implant stability</term>
<term>Implants research</term>
<term>Insertion</term>
<term>Insertion torque</term>
<term>Insertion torque values</term>
<term>Intermediate rate</term>
<term>International journal</term>
<term>John wiley sons</term>
<term>Lateral</term>
<term>Lateral force</term>
<term>Least insertion torque</term>
<term>Lesser insertion torque</term>
<term>Linear effect</term>
<term>Linear effects</term>
<term>Linear slope</term>
<term>Lowest insertion torque values</term>
<term>Maxillofacial surgery</term>
<term>Micromotion</term>
<term>Model anova</term>
<term>Null hypothesis</term>
<term>Oral impl</term>
<term>Oral maxillofacial implants</term>
<term>Present study</term>
<term>Primary stability</term>
<term>Randomized analysis</term>
<term>Removal torque</term>
<term>Resonance frequency analysis</term>
<term>Scandinavian journal</term>
<term>Several studies</term>
<term>Single implant crowns</term>
<term>Standard deviation</term>
<term>Statistical comparison</term>
<term>Thread design</term>
<term>Thread pitch</term>
<term>Torque</term>
<term>Torque capacity</term>
<term>Trisi</term>
<term>Uted</term>
<term>Uted design</term>
<term>Uted implants</term>
</keywords>
<keywords scheme="Teeft" xml:lang="en"><term>Astm standards</term>
<term>Biomechanical aspects</term>
<term>Biomedical materials research</term>
<term>Blossomt</term>
<term>Blossomt design</term>
<term>Blossomt group</term>
<term>Blossomt implants</term>
<term>Bone density</term>
<term>Cadaver</term>
<term>Clinical implant dentistry</term>
<term>Coelho</term>
<term>Contact endoscopy</term>
<term>Dental implants</term>
<term>Dentistry</term>
<term>Different implant designs</term>
<term>Different macrodesigns</term>
<term>Digital force gauge</term>
<term>Digital micrometer</term>
<term>Digital torque gauge</term>
<term>Fastest rate</term>
<term>Foam block</term>
<term>Foam blocks</term>
<term>Force gauge</term>
<term>Freitas</term>
<term>Groove design</term>
<term>Grouping factor</term>
<term>Groups note</term>
<term>Homogeneous groups</term>
<term>Horizontal displacement</term>
<term>Human cadaver bone</term>
<term>Human cadaver study</term>
<term>Identical thread design</term>
<term>Immediate loading</term>
<term>Immediate micromotion</term>
<term>Implant</term>
<term>Implant dentistry</term>
<term>Implant design</term>
<term>Implant design effect</term>
<term>Implant design group</term>
<term>Implant designs</term>
<term>Implant integration</term>
<term>Implant macrodesigns</term>
<term>Implant macrogeometry</term>
<term>Implant micromotion</term>
<term>Implant placement</term>
<term>Implant stability</term>
<term>Implants research</term>
<term>Insertion</term>
<term>Insertion torque</term>
<term>Insertion torque values</term>
<term>Intermediate rate</term>
<term>International journal</term>
<term>John wiley sons</term>
<term>Lateral</term>
<term>Lateral force</term>
<term>Least insertion torque</term>
<term>Lesser insertion torque</term>
<term>Linear effect</term>
<term>Linear effects</term>
<term>Linear slope</term>
<term>Lowest insertion torque values</term>
<term>Maxillofacial surgery</term>
<term>Micromotion</term>
<term>Model anova</term>
<term>Null hypothesis</term>
<term>Oral impl</term>
<term>Oral maxillofacial implants</term>
<term>Present study</term>
<term>Primary stability</term>
<term>Randomized analysis</term>
<term>Removal torque</term>
<term>Resonance frequency analysis</term>
<term>Scandinavian journal</term>
<term>Several studies</term>
<term>Single implant crowns</term>
<term>Standard deviation</term>
<term>Statistical comparison</term>
<term>Thread design</term>
<term>Thread pitch</term>
<term>Torque</term>
<term>Torque capacity</term>
<term>Trisi</term>
<term>Uted</term>
<term>Uted design</term>
<term>Uted implants</term>
</keywords>
</textClass>
</profileDesc>
</teiHeader>
<front><div type="abstract">Objectives: To evaluate the effect of insertion torque on micromotion to a lateral force in three different implant designs.</div>
</front>
</TEI>
<istex><corpusName>wiley</corpusName>
<keywords><teeft><json:string>implant</json:string>
<json:string>insertion torque</json:string>
<json:string>micromotion</json:string>
<json:string>insertion</json:string>
<json:string>blossomt</json:string>
<json:string>uted</json:string>
<json:string>implant design</json:string>
<json:string>implant design group</json:string>
<json:string>primary stability</json:string>
<json:string>trisi</json:string>
<json:string>freitas</json:string>
<json:string>torque</json:string>
<json:string>coelho</json:string>
<json:string>present study</json:string>
<json:string>uted design</json:string>
<json:string>john wiley sons</json:string>
<json:string>international journal</json:string>
<json:string>implants research</json:string>
<json:string>oral impl</json:string>
<json:string>implant design effect</json:string>
<json:string>implant placement</json:string>
<json:string>implant designs</json:string>
<json:string>foam blocks</json:string>
<json:string>dentistry</json:string>
<json:string>lateral</json:string>
<json:string>bone density</json:string>
<json:string>horizontal displacement</json:string>
<json:string>human cadaver study</json:string>
<json:string>dental implants</json:string>
<json:string>blossomt design</json:string>
<json:string>standard deviation</json:string>
<json:string>biomedical materials research</json:string>
<json:string>clinical implant dentistry</json:string>
<json:string>different implant designs</json:string>
<json:string>blossomt implants</json:string>
<json:string>lateral force</json:string>
<json:string>model anova</json:string>
<json:string>cadaver</json:string>
<json:string>implant stability</json:string>
<json:string>blossomt group</json:string>
<json:string>digital torque gauge</json:string>
<json:string>least insertion torque</json:string>
<json:string>immediate micromotion</json:string>
<json:string>insertion torque values</json:string>
<json:string>force gauge</json:string>
<json:string>implant micromotion</json:string>
<json:string>different macrodesigns</json:string>
<json:string>oral maxillofacial implants</json:string>
<json:string>foam block</json:string>
<json:string>biomechanical aspects</json:string>
<json:string>thread pitch</json:string>
<json:string>null hypothesis</json:string>
<json:string>implant macrogeometry</json:string>
<json:string>implant integration</json:string>
<json:string>implant dentistry</json:string>
<json:string>intermediate rate</json:string>
<json:string>fastest rate</json:string>
<json:string>uted implants</json:string>
<json:string>linear effect</json:string>
<json:string>linear slope</json:string>
<json:string>randomized analysis</json:string>
<json:string>grouping factor</json:string>
<json:string>single implant crowns</json:string>
<json:string>groups note</json:string>
<json:string>homogeneous groups</json:string>
<json:string>lowest insertion torque values</json:string>
<json:string>lesser insertion torque</json:string>
<json:string>digital micrometer</json:string>
<json:string>resonance frequency analysis</json:string>
<json:string>contact endoscopy</json:string>
<json:string>removal torque</json:string>
<json:string>implant macrodesigns</json:string>
<json:string>linear effects</json:string>
<json:string>human cadaver bone</json:string>
<json:string>astm standards</json:string>
<json:string>statistical comparison</json:string>
<json:string>digital force gauge</json:string>
<json:string>maxillofacial surgery</json:string>
<json:string>thread design</json:string>
<json:string>immediate loading</json:string>
<json:string>scandinavian journal</json:string>
<json:string>groove design</json:string>
<json:string>identical thread design</json:string>
<json:string>torque capacity</json:string>
<json:string>several studies</json:string>
</teeft>
</keywords>
<author><json:item><name>Amilcar C. Freitas Jr</name>
<affiliations><json:string>Department of Biomaterials and Biomimetics, New York University, New York, NY, USA</json:string>
</affiliations>
</json:item>
<json:item><name>Estevam A. Bonfante</name>
<affiliations><json:string>Department of Prosthodontics, University of São Paulo, Bauru School of Dentistry, Bauru, SP, Brazil</json:string>
</affiliations>
</json:item>
<json:item><name>Gabriela Giro</name>
<affiliations><json:string>Department of Oral Diagnosis and Surgery, Faculdade de Odontologia de Araraquara, Universidade Estadual Paulista Júlio de Mesquita Filho, Araraquara, SP, Brazil</json:string>
</affiliations>
</json:item>
<json:item><name>Malvin N. Janal</name>
<affiliations><json:string>Department of Epidemiology and Health Promotion, New York University College of Dentistry, New York, NY, USA</json:string>
</affiliations>
</json:item>
<json:item><name>Paulo G. Coelho</name>
<affiliations><json:string>Department of Biomaterials and Biomimetics, New York University, New York, NY, USA</json:string>
</affiliations>
</json:item>
</author>
<subject><json:item><lang><json:string>eng</json:string>
</lang>
<value>dental implant</value>
</json:item>
<json:item><lang><json:string>eng</json:string>
</lang>
<value>insertion torque</value>
</json:item>
<json:item><lang><json:string>eng</json:string>
</lang>
<value>micromotion</value>
</json:item>
<json:item><lang><json:string>eng</json:string>
</lang>
<value>osseointegration</value>
</json:item>
<json:item><lang><json:string>eng</json:string>
</lang>
<value>primary stability</value>
</json:item>
</subject>
<articleId><json:string>CLR2142</json:string>
</articleId>
<arkIstex>ark:/67375/WNG-1KHM2WJ4-6</arkIstex>
<language><json:string>eng</json:string>
</language>
<originalGenre><json:string>article</json:string>
</originalGenre>
<abstract>Objectives: To evaluate the effect of insertion torque on micromotion to a lateral force in three different implant designs.</abstract>
<qualityIndicators><score>6.456</score>
<pdfWordCount>4228</pdfWordCount>
<pdfCharCount>27268</pdfCharCount>
<pdfVersion>1.3</pdfVersion>
<pdfPageCount>6</pdfPageCount>
<pdfPageSize>595.276 x 782.362 pts</pdfPageSize>
<refBibsNative>true</refBibsNative>
<abstractWordCount>19</abstractWordCount>
<abstractCharCount>124</abstractCharCount>
<keywordCount>5</keywordCount>
</qualityIndicators>
<title>The effect of implant design on insertion torque and immediate micromotion</title>
<pmid><json:string>21426405</json:string>
</pmid>
<genre><json:string>article</json:string>
</genre>
<host><title>Clinical Oral Implants Research</title>
<language><json:string>unknown</json:string>
</language>
<doi><json:string>10.1111/(ISSN)1600-0501</json:string>
</doi>
<issn><json:string>0905-7161</json:string>
</issn>
<eissn><json:string>1600-0501</json:string>
</eissn>
<publisherId><json:string>CLR</json:string>
</publisherId>
<volume>23</volume>
<issue>1</issue>
<pages><first>113</first>
<last>118</last>
<total>6</total>
</pages>
<genre><json:string>journal</json:string>
</genre>
</host>
<namedEntities><unitex><date><json:string>2011</json:string>
<json:string>2012</json:string>
<json:string>1970s</json:string>
</date>
<geogName></geogName>
<orgName><json:string>Research Laboratories, Vashon, WA, USA</json:string>
<json:string>Department of Epidemiology and Health Promotion</json:string>
<json:string>Department of Prosthodontics, University of Sa Paulo, Bauru School of Dentistry</json:string>
<json:string>Brazil Gabriela Giro, Department of Oral Diagnosis and Surgery</json:string>
<json:string>Intra-Lock International</json:string>
<json:string>Annual Book of ASTM Standards</json:string>
<json:string>Brazil Malvin N</json:string>
<json:string>New York University</json:string>
<json:string>Brazil Tel</json:string>
</orgName>
<orgName_funder></orgName_funder>
<orgName_provider></orgName_provider>
<persName><json:string>Lekholm</json:string>
<json:string>Zarb</json:string>
<json:string>Branemark</json:string>
<json:string>John Wiley</json:string>
<json:string>Paulo G. Coelho</json:string>
<json:string>A. Bonfante</json:string>
<json:string>C. Freitas</json:string>
<json:string>Julio de Mesquita</json:string>
</persName>
<placeName><json:string>NY</json:string>
<json:string>USA</json:string>
<json:string>York</json:string>
</placeName>
<ref_url></ref_url>
<ref_bibl><json:string>Cameron et al. 1972, 1973</json:string>
<json:string>Akkocaoglu et al. 2005</json:string>
<json:string>Pilliar et al. 1986</json:string>
<json:string>Chuang et al. 2001</json:string>
<json:string>Branemark et al. 1969</json:string>
<json:string>[2,645]</json:string>
<json:string>Niimi et al. 1997</json:string>
<json:string>Cochran et al. 1998</json:string>
<json:string>Sullivan et al. 2000</json:string>
<json:string>Gotfredsen et al. 1995</json:string>
<json:string>[1,645]</json:string>
<json:string>Ottoni et al. 2005</json:string>
<json:string>[2,53]</json:string>
<json:string>Engelke et al. 2004</json:string>
<json:string>Lekholm 1985</json:string>
<json:string>Atieh et al. 2009</json:string>
<json:string>Coelho et al. 2010</json:string>
<json:string>Tabassum et al. 2010</json:string>
<json:string>Coelho et al. 2009</json:string>
<json:string>Freitas et al</json:string>
<json:string>Bardyn et al. 2009</json:string>
<json:string>da Cunha et al. 2004</json:string>
<json:string>Jasty et al. 1997</json:string>
<json:string>Kahraman et al. 2009</json:string>
<json:string>Akca et al. 2010</json:string>
<json:string>Trisi et al. 2009</json:string>
<json:string>Akkocaoglu et al. 2007</json:string>
<json:string>Branemark et al. 1977</json:string>
<json:string>[2,33]</json:string>
<json:string>[2,285]</json:string>
<json:string>Battula et al. 2006</json:string>
<json:string>Turkyilmaz et al. 2009</json:string>
<json:string>Friberg et al. 1999</json:string>
<json:string>[1,285]</json:string>
<json:string>Schnitman et al. 1997</json:string>
<json:string>Javed & Romanos 2010</json:string>
<json:string>Szmukler-Moncler et al. 1998</json:string>
</ref_bibl>
<bibl></bibl>
</unitex>
</namedEntities>
<ark><json:string>ark:/67375/WNG-1KHM2WJ4-6</json:string>
</ark>
<categories><wos><json:string>1 - science</json:string>
<json:string>2 - engineering, biomedical</json:string>
<json:string>2 - dentistry, oral surgery & medicine</json:string>
</wos>
<scienceMetrix><json:string>1 - health sciences</json:string>
<json:string>2 - clinical medicine</json:string>
<json:string>3 - dentistry</json:string>
</scienceMetrix>
<scopus><json:string>1 - Health Sciences</json:string>
<json:string>2 - Dentistry</json:string>
<json:string>3 - Oral Surgery</json:string>
</scopus>
</categories>
<publicationDate>2012</publicationDate>
<copyrightDate>2012</copyrightDate>
<doi><json:string>10.1111/j.1600-0501.2010.02142.x</json:string>
</doi>
<id>EC39636305F2417AEDCECF86F319CCC048434ADA</id>
<score>1</score>
<fulltext><json:item><extension>pdf</extension>
<original>true</original>
<mimetype>application/pdf</mimetype>
<uri>https://api.istex.fr/document/EC39636305F2417AEDCECF86F319CCC048434ADA/fulltext/pdf</uri>
</json:item>
<json:item><extension>zip</extension>
<original>false</original>
<mimetype>application/zip</mimetype>
<uri>https://api.istex.fr/document/EC39636305F2417AEDCECF86F319CCC048434ADA/fulltext/zip</uri>
</json:item>
<istex:fulltextTEI uri="https://api.istex.fr/document/EC39636305F2417AEDCECF86F319CCC048434ADA/fulltext/tei"><teiHeader><fileDesc><titleStmt><title level="a" type="main">The effect of implant design on insertion torque and immediate micromotion</title>
</titleStmt>
<publicationStmt><authority>ISTEX</authority>
<publisher>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</publisher>
<pubPlace>Oxford, UK</pubPlace>
<availability><licence>© 2011 John Wiley & Sons A/S</licence>
</availability>
<date type="published" when="2012-01"></date>
</publicationStmt>
<notesStmt><note type="content-type" subtype="article" source="article" scheme="https://content-type.data.istex.fr/ark:/67375/XTP-6N5SZHKN-D">article</note>
<note type="publication-type" subtype="journal" scheme="https://publication-type.data.istex.fr/ark:/67375/JMC-0GLKJH51-B">journal</note>
</notesStmt>
<sourceDesc><biblStruct type="article"><analytic><title level="a" type="main">The effect of implant design on insertion torque and immediate micromotion</title>
<title level="a" type="short">Implant design effect on insertion torque and micromotion</title>
<author xml:id="author-0000"><persName><forename type="first">Amilcar C.</forename>
<surname>Freitas Jr</surname>
</persName>
<affiliation>Department of Biomaterials and Biomimetics, New York University, New York, NY, USA<address><country key="US"></country>
</address>
</affiliation>
</author>
<author xml:id="author-0001"><persName><forename type="first">Estevam A.</forename>
<surname>Bonfante</surname>
</persName>
<affiliation>Department of Prosthodontics, University of São Paulo, Bauru School of Dentistry, Bauru, SP, Brazil<address><country key="BR"></country>
</address>
</affiliation>
</author>
<author xml:id="author-0002"><persName><forename type="first">Gabriela</forename>
<surname>Giro</surname>
</persName>
<affiliation>Department of Oral Diagnosis and Surgery, Faculdade de Odontologia de Araraquara, Universidade Estadual Paulista Júlio de Mesquita Filho, Araraquara, SP, Brazil<address><country key="BR"></country>
</address>
</affiliation>
</author>
<author xml:id="author-0003"><persName><forename type="first">Malvin N.</forename>
<surname>Janal</surname>
</persName>
<affiliation>Department of Epidemiology and Health Promotion, New York University College of Dentistry, New York, NY, USA<address><country key="US"></country>
</address>
</affiliation>
</author>
<author xml:id="author-0004"><persName><forename type="first">Paulo G.</forename>
<surname>Coelho</surname>
</persName>
<affiliation>Department of Biomaterials and Biomimetics, New York University, New York, NY, USA<address><country key="US"></country>
</address>
</affiliation>
</author>
<idno type="istex">EC39636305F2417AEDCECF86F319CCC048434ADA</idno>
<idno type="ark">ark:/67375/WNG-1KHM2WJ4-6</idno>
<idno type="DOI">10.1111/j.1600-0501.2010.02142.x</idno>
<idno type="unit">CLR2142</idno>
<idno type="toTypesetVersion">file:CLR.CLR2142.pdf</idno>
</analytic>
<monogr><title level="j" type="main">Clinical Oral Implants Research</title>
<title level="j" type="alt">CLINICAL ORAL IMPLANTS RESEARCH</title>
<idno type="pISSN">0905-7161</idno>
<idno type="eISSN">1600-0501</idno>
<idno type="book-DOI">10.1111/(ISSN)1600-0501</idno>
<idno type="book-part-DOI">10.1111/clr.2011.23.issue-1</idno>
<idno type="product">CLR</idno>
<idno type="publisherDivision">ST</idno>
<imprint><biblScope unit="vol">23</biblScope>
<biblScope unit="issue">1</biblScope>
<biblScope unit="page" from="113">113</biblScope>
<biblScope unit="page" to="118">118</biblScope>
<biblScope unit="page-count">6</biblScope>
<publisher>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</publisher>
<pubPlace>Oxford, UK</pubPlace>
<date type="published" when="2012-01"></date>
</imprint>
</monogr>
</biblStruct>
</sourceDesc>
</fileDesc>
<profileDesc><abstract xml:lang="en" style="main"><head>Abstract</head>
<p><hi rend="bold">Objectives: </hi>
 To evaluate the effect of insertion torque on micromotion to a lateral force in three different implant designs.</p>
<p><hi rend="bold">Material and methods: </hi>
 Thirty‐six implants with identical thread design, but different cutting groove design were divided in three groups: (1) non‐fluted (no cutting groove, solid screw‐form); (2) fluted (90° cut at the apex, tap design); and (3) Blossom<hi rend="superscript">™</hi>
 (Patent pending) (non‐fluted with engineered trimmed thread design). The implants were screwed into polyurethane foam blocks and the insertion torque was recorded after each turn of 90° by a digital torque gauge. Controlled lateral loads of 10 N followed by increments of 5 up to 100 N were sequentially applied by a digital force gauge on a titanium abutment. Statistical comparison was performed with two‐way mixed model ANOVA that evaluated implant design group, linear effects of turns and displacement loads, and their interaction.</p>
<p><hi rend="bold">Results: </hi>
 While insertion torque increased as a function of number of turns for each design, the slope and final values increased (<hi rend="italic">P</hi>
<0.001) progressively from the Blossom<hi rend="superscript">™</hi>
 to the fluted to the non‐fluted design (M±standard deviation [SD]=64.1±26.8, 139.4±17.2, and 205.23±24.3 Ncm, respectively). While a linear relationship between horizontal displacement and lateral force was observed for each design, the slope and maximal displacement increased (<hi rend="italic">P</hi>
<0.001) progressively from the Blossom<hi rend="superscript">™</hi>
 to the fluted to the non‐fluted design (M±SD=530±57.7, 585.9±82.4, and 782.33±269.4 μm, respectively). There was negligible to moderate levels of association between insertion torque and lateral displacement in the Blossom<hi rend="superscript">™</hi>
, fluted and non‐fluted design groups, respectively.</p>
<p><hi rend="bold">Conclusion: </hi>
 Insertion torque was reduced in implant macrodesigns that incorporated cutting edges, and lesser insertion torque was generally associated with decreased micromovement. However, insertion torque and micromotion were unrelated within implant designs, particularly for those designs showing the least insertion torque.</p>
<p><hi rend="bold">To cite this article:</hi>
 Freitas AC Jr, Bonfante EA, Giro G, Janal MN, Coelho PG. The effect of implant design on insertion torque and immediate micromotion. <hi rend="italic">Clin. Oral Impl. Res</hi>
. <hi rend="bold">23</hi>
, 2012; 113–118. doi: 10.1111/j.1600‐0501.2010.02142.x</p>
</abstract>
<textClass><keywords xml:lang="en"><term xml:id="k1">dental implant</term>
<term xml:id="k2">insertion torque</term>
<term xml:id="k3">micromotion</term>
<term xml:id="k4">osseointegration</term>
<term xml:id="k5">primary stability</term>
</keywords>
<keywords rend="tocHeading1"><term>Original Articles</term>
</keywords>
</textClass>
<langUsage><language ident="en"></language>
</langUsage>
</profileDesc>
</teiHeader>
</istex:fulltextTEI>
<json:item><extension>txt</extension>
<original>false</original>
<mimetype>text/plain</mimetype>
<uri>https://api.istex.fr/document/EC39636305F2417AEDCECF86F319CCC048434ADA/fulltext/txt</uri>
</json:item>
</fulltext>
<metadata><istex:metadataXml wicri:clean="Wiley, elements deleted: body"><istex:xmlDeclaration>version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" standalone="yes"</istex:xmlDeclaration>
<istex:document><component version="2.0" type="serialArticle" xml:lang="en"><header><publicationMeta level="product"><publisherInfo><publisherName>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</publisherName>
<publisherLoc>Oxford, UK</publisherLoc>
</publisherInfo>
<doi origin="wiley" registered="yes">10.1111/(ISSN)1600-0501</doi>
<issn type="print">0905-7161</issn>
<issn type="electronic">1600-0501</issn>
<idGroup><id type="product" value="CLR"></id>
<id type="publisherDivision" value="ST"></id>
</idGroup>
<titleGroup><title type="main" sort="CLINICAL ORAL IMPLANTS RESEARCH">Clinical Oral Implants Research</title>
</titleGroup>
</publicationMeta>
<publicationMeta level="part" position="01101"><doi origin="wiley">10.1111/clr.2011.23.issue-1</doi>
<numberingGroup><numbering type="journalVolume" number="23">23</numbering>
<numbering type="journalIssue" number="1">1</numbering>
</numberingGroup>
<coverDate startDate="2012-01">January 2012</coverDate>
</publicationMeta>
<publicationMeta level="unit" type="article" position="18" status="forIssue"><doi origin="wiley">10.1111/j.1600-0501.2010.02142.x</doi>
<idGroup><id type="unit" value="CLR2142"></id>
</idGroup>
<countGroup><count type="pageTotal" number="6"></count>
</countGroup>
<titleGroup><title type="tocHeading1">Original Articles</title>
</titleGroup>
<copyright>© 2011 John Wiley & Sons A/S</copyright>
<eventGroup><event type="xmlConverted" agent="Converter:BPG_TO_WML3G version:2.9.1 mode:FullText" date="2011-12-15"></event>
<event agent="SPS" date="2011-12-15" type="xmlCorrected"></event>
<event type="publishedOnlineEarlyUnpaginated" date="2011-03-23"></event>
<event type="firstOnline" date="2011-03-23"></event>
<event type="publishedOnlineFinalForm" date="2011-12-19"></event>
<event type="xmlConverted" agent="Converter:WILEY_ML3G_TO_WILEY_ML3GV2 version:4.0.1" date="2014-03-12"></event>
<event type="xmlConverted" agent="Converter:WML3G_To_WML3G version:4.3.4 mode:FullText" date="2015-02-25"></event>
</eventGroup>
<numberingGroup><numbering type="pageFirst" number="113">113</numbering>
<numbering type="pageLast" number="118">118</numbering>
</numberingGroup>
<correspondenceTo><b>Corresponding author:</b>
 <i>Estevam A. Bonfante</i>
 Al. Octávio Pinheiro Brisola 9‐75 ‐ Bauru SP 17012‐901 Brazil Tel.: 55 14 3235 8277 Fax: 55 14 3234 2566 e‐mail: <email normalForm="estevamab@gmail.com">estevamab@gmail.com</email>
</correspondenceTo>
<linkGroup><link type="toTypesetVersion" href="file:CLR.CLR2142.pdf"></link>
</linkGroup>
</publicationMeta>
<contentMeta><unparsedEditorialHistory><b>Date:</b>
, Accepted 23 November 2010</unparsedEditorialHistory>
<countGroup><count type="figureTotal" number="6"></count>
<count type="tableTotal" number="0"></count>
<count type="formulaTotal" number="0"></count>
<count type="referenceTotal" number="34"></count>
<count type="wordTotal" number="5187"></count>
<count type="linksCrossRef" number="35"></count>
</countGroup>
<titleGroup><title type="main">The effect of implant design on insertion torque and immediate micromotion</title>
<title type="shortAuthors">Freitas et al.</title>
<title type="short">Implant design effect on insertion torque and micromotion</title>
</titleGroup>
<creators><creator creatorRole="author" xml:id="cr1" affiliationRef="#a1"><personName><givenNames>Amilcar C.</givenNames>
<familyName>Freitas Jr</familyName>
</personName>
</creator>
<creator creatorRole="author" xml:id="cr2" affiliationRef="#a2"><personName><givenNames>Estevam A.</givenNames>
<familyName>Bonfante</familyName>
</personName>
</creator>
<creator creatorRole="author" xml:id="cr3" affiliationRef="#a3"><personName><givenNames>Gabriela</givenNames>
<familyName>Giro</familyName>
</personName>
</creator>
<creator creatorRole="author" xml:id="cr4" affiliationRef="#a4"><personName><givenNames>Malvin N.</givenNames>
<familyName>Janal</familyName>
</personName>
</creator>
<creator creatorRole="author" xml:id="cr5" affiliationRef="#a1"><personName><givenNames>Paulo G.</givenNames>
<familyName>Coelho</familyName>
</personName>
</creator>
</creators>
<affiliationGroup><affiliation xml:id="a1" countryCode="US"><unparsedAffiliation>Department of Biomaterials and Biomimetics, New York University, New York, NY, USA</unparsedAffiliation>
</affiliation>
<affiliation xml:id="a2" countryCode="BR"><unparsedAffiliation>Department of Prosthodontics, University of São Paulo, Bauru School of Dentistry, Bauru, SP, Brazil</unparsedAffiliation>
</affiliation>
<affiliation xml:id="a3" countryCode="BR"><unparsedAffiliation>Department of Oral Diagnosis and Surgery, Faculdade de Odontologia de Araraquara, Universidade Estadual Paulista Júlio de Mesquita Filho, Araraquara, SP, Brazil</unparsedAffiliation>
</affiliation>
<affiliation xml:id="a4" countryCode="US"><unparsedAffiliation>Department of Epidemiology and Health Promotion, New York University College of Dentistry, New York, NY, USA</unparsedAffiliation>
</affiliation>
</affiliationGroup>
<keywordGroup xml:lang="en"><keyword xml:id="k1">dental implant</keyword>
<keyword xml:id="k2">insertion torque</keyword>
<keyword xml:id="k3">micromotion</keyword>
<keyword xml:id="k4">osseointegration</keyword>
<keyword xml:id="k5">primary stability</keyword>
</keywordGroup>
<abstractGroup><abstract type="main" xml:lang="en"><title type="main">Abstract</title>
<p><b>Objectives: </b>
 To evaluate the effect of insertion torque on micromotion to a lateral force in three different implant designs.</p>
<p><b>Material and methods: </b>
 Thirty‐six implants with identical thread design, but different cutting groove design were divided in three groups: (1) non‐fluted (no cutting groove, solid screw‐form); (2) fluted (90° cut at the apex, tap design); and (3) Blossom<sup>™</sup>
 (Patent pending) (non‐fluted with engineered trimmed thread design). The implants were screwed into polyurethane foam blocks and the insertion torque was recorded after each turn of 90° by a digital torque gauge. Controlled lateral loads of 10 N followed by increments of 5 up to 100 N were sequentially applied by a digital force gauge on a titanium abutment. Statistical comparison was performed with two‐way mixed model ANOVA that evaluated implant design group, linear effects of turns and displacement loads, and their interaction.</p>
<p><b>Results: </b>
 While insertion torque increased as a function of number of turns for each design, the slope and final values increased (<i>P</i>
<0.001) progressively from the Blossom<sup>™</sup>
 to the fluted to the non‐fluted design (M±standard deviation [SD]=64.1±26.8, 139.4±17.2, and 205.23±24.3 Ncm, respectively). While a linear relationship between horizontal displacement and lateral force was observed for each design, the slope and maximal displacement increased (<i>P</i>
<0.001) progressively from the Blossom<sup>™</sup>
 to the fluted to the non‐fluted design (M±SD=530±57.7, 585.9±82.4, and 782.33±269.4 μm, respectively). There was negligible to moderate levels of association between insertion torque and lateral displacement in the Blossom<sup>™</sup>
, fluted and non‐fluted design groups, respectively.</p>
<p><b>Conclusion: </b>
 Insertion torque was reduced in implant macrodesigns that incorporated cutting edges, and lesser insertion torque was generally associated with decreased micromovement. However, insertion torque and micromotion were unrelated within implant designs, particularly for those designs showing the least insertion torque.</p>
<p><b>To cite this article:</b>
 Freitas AC Jr, Bonfante EA, Giro G, Janal MN, Coelho PG. The effect of implant design on insertion torque and immediate micromotion. <i>Clin. Oral Impl. Res</i>
. <b>23</b>
, 2012; 113–118. doi: 10.1111/j.1600‐0501.2010.02142.x</p>
</abstract>
</abstractGroup>
</contentMeta>
</header>
</component>
</istex:document>
</istex:metadataXml>
<mods version="3.6"><titleInfo lang="en"><title>The effect of implant design on insertion torque and immediate micromotion</title>
</titleInfo>
<titleInfo type="abbreviated" lang="en"><title>Implant design effect on insertion torque and micromotion</title>
</titleInfo>
<titleInfo type="alternative" contentType="CDATA" lang="en"><title>The effect of implant design on insertion torque and immediate micromotion</title>
</titleInfo>
<name type="personal"><namePart type="given">Amilcar C.</namePart>
<namePart type="family">Freitas Jr</namePart>
<affiliation>Department of Biomaterials and Biomimetics, New York University, New York, NY, USA</affiliation>
<role><roleTerm type="text">author</roleTerm>
</role>
</name>
<name type="personal"><namePart type="given">Estevam A.</namePart>
<namePart type="family">Bonfante</namePart>
<affiliation>Department of Prosthodontics, University of São Paulo, Bauru School of Dentistry, Bauru, SP, Brazil</affiliation>
<role><roleTerm type="text">author</roleTerm>
</role>
</name>
<name type="personal"><namePart type="given">Gabriela</namePart>
<namePart type="family">Giro</namePart>
<affiliation>Department of Oral Diagnosis and Surgery, Faculdade de Odontologia de Araraquara, Universidade Estadual Paulista Júlio de Mesquita Filho, Araraquara, SP, Brazil</affiliation>
<role><roleTerm type="text">author</roleTerm>
</role>
</name>
<name type="personal"><namePart type="given">Malvin N.</namePart>
<namePart type="family">Janal</namePart>
<affiliation>Department of Epidemiology and Health Promotion, New York University College of Dentistry, New York, NY, USA</affiliation>
<role><roleTerm type="text">author</roleTerm>
</role>
</name>
<name type="personal"><namePart type="given">Paulo G.</namePart>
<namePart type="family">Coelho</namePart>
<affiliation>Department of Biomaterials and Biomimetics, New York University, New York, NY, USA</affiliation>
<role><roleTerm type="text">author</roleTerm>
</role>
</name>
<typeOfResource>text</typeOfResource>
<genre type="article" displayLabel="article" authority="ISTEX" authorityURI="https://content-type.data.istex.fr" valueURI="https://content-type.data.istex.fr/ark:/67375/XTP-6N5SZHKN-D">article</genre>
<originInfo><publisher>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</publisher>
<place><placeTerm type="text">Oxford, UK</placeTerm>
</place>
<dateIssued encoding="w3cdtf">2012-01</dateIssued>
<edition>Date:, Accepted 23 November 2010</edition>
<copyrightDate encoding="w3cdtf">2012</copyrightDate>
</originInfo>
<language><languageTerm type="code" authority="rfc3066">en</languageTerm>
<languageTerm type="code" authority="iso639-2b">eng</languageTerm>
</language>
<physicalDescription><extent unit="figures">6</extent>
<extent unit="tables">0</extent>
<extent unit="formulas">0</extent>
<extent unit="references">34</extent>
<extent unit="linksCrossRef">35</extent>
<extent unit="words">5187</extent>
</physicalDescription>
<abstract>Objectives: To evaluate the effect of insertion torque on micromotion to a lateral force in three different implant designs.</abstract>
<abstract>Material and methods: Thirty‐six implants with identical thread design, but different cutting groove design were divided in three groups: (1) non‐fluted (no cutting groove, solid screw‐form); (2) fluted (90° cut at the apex, tap design); and (3) Blossom™ (Patent pending) (non‐fluted with engineered trimmed thread design). The implants were screwed into polyurethane foam blocks and the insertion torque was recorded after each turn of 90° by a digital torque gauge. Controlled lateral loads of 10 N followed by increments of 5 up to 100 N were sequentially applied by a digital force gauge on a titanium abutment. Statistical comparison was performed with two‐way mixed model ANOVA that evaluated implant design group, linear effects of turns and displacement loads, and their interaction.</abstract>
<abstract>Results: While insertion torque increased as a function of number of turns for each design, the slope and final values increased (P<0.001) progressively from the Blossom™ to the fluted to the non‐fluted design (M±standard deviation [SD]=64.1±26.8, 139.4±17.2, and 205.23±24.3 Ncm, respectively). While a linear relationship between horizontal displacement and lateral force was observed for each design, the slope and maximal displacement increased (P<0.001) progressively from the Blossom™ to the fluted to the non‐fluted design (M±SD=530±57.7, 585.9±82.4, and 782.33±269.4 μm, respectively). There was negligible to moderate levels of association between insertion torque and lateral displacement in the Blossom™, fluted and non‐fluted design groups, respectively.</abstract>
<abstract>Conclusion: Insertion torque was reduced in implant macrodesigns that incorporated cutting edges, and lesser insertion torque was generally associated with decreased micromovement. However, insertion torque and micromotion were unrelated within implant designs, particularly for those designs showing the least insertion torque.</abstract>
<abstract>To cite this article: Freitas AC Jr, Bonfante EA, Giro G, Janal MN, Coelho PG. The effect of implant design on insertion torque and immediate micromotion. Clin. Oral Impl. Res. 23, 2012; 113–118. doi: 10.1111/j.1600‐0501.2010.02142.x</abstract>
<subject lang="en"><genre>keywords</genre>
<topic>dental implant</topic>
<topic>insertion torque</topic>
<topic>micromotion</topic>
<topic>osseointegration</topic>
<topic>primary stability</topic>
</subject>
<relatedItem type="host"><titleInfo><title>Clinical Oral Implants Research</title>
</titleInfo>
<genre type="journal" authority="ISTEX" authorityURI="https://publication-type.data.istex.fr" valueURI="https://publication-type.data.istex.fr/ark:/67375/JMC-0GLKJH51-B">journal</genre>
<identifier type="ISSN">0905-7161</identifier>
<identifier type="eISSN">1600-0501</identifier>
<identifier type="DOI">10.1111/(ISSN)1600-0501</identifier>
<identifier type="PublisherID">CLR</identifier>
<part><date>2012</date>
<detail type="volume"><caption>vol.</caption>
<number>23</number>
</detail>
<detail type="issue"><caption>no.</caption>
<number>1</number>
</detail>
<extent unit="pages"><start>113</start>
<end>118</end>
<total>6</total>
</extent>
</part>
</relatedItem>
<identifier type="istex">EC39636305F2417AEDCECF86F319CCC048434ADA</identifier>
<identifier type="ark">ark:/67375/WNG-1KHM2WJ4-6</identifier>
<identifier type="DOI">10.1111/j.1600-0501.2010.02142.x</identifier>
<identifier type="ArticleID">CLR2142</identifier>
<accessCondition type="use and reproduction" contentType="copyright">© 2011 John Wiley & Sons A/S</accessCondition>
<recordInfo><recordContentSource authority="ISTEX" authorityURI="https://loaded-corpus.data.istex.fr" valueURI="https://loaded-corpus.data.istex.fr/ark:/67375/XBH-L0C46X92-X">wiley</recordContentSource>
<recordOrigin>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</recordOrigin>
</recordInfo>
</mods>
<json:item><extension>json</extension>
<original>false</original>
<mimetype>application/json</mimetype>
<uri>https://api.istex.fr/document/EC39636305F2417AEDCECF86F319CCC048434ADA/metadata/json</uri>
</json:item>
</metadata>
<serie></serie>
</istex>
</record>

Pour manipuler ce document sous Unix (Dilib)

EXPLOR_STEP=$WICRI_ROOT/Wicri/Santé/explor/EdenteV2/Data/Istex/Corpus

HfdSelect -h $EXPLOR_STEP/biblio.hfd -nk 007503 | SxmlIndent | more

HfdSelect -h $EXPLOR_AREA/Data/Istex/Corpus/biblio.hfd -nk 007503 | SxmlIndent | more

Pour mettre un lien sur cette page dans le réseau Wicri

{{Explor lien
   |wiki=    Wicri/Santé
   |area=    EdenteV2
   |flux=    Istex
   |étape=   Corpus
   |type=    RBID
   |clé=     ISTEX:EC39636305F2417AEDCECF86F319CCC048434ADA
   |texte=   The effect of implant design on insertion torque and immediate micromotion
}}

This area was generated with Dilib version V0.6.32.
Data generation: Thu Nov 30 15:26:48 2017. Site generation: Tue Mar 8 16:36:20 2022

	Serveur d'exploration sur le patient édenté
	Attention, ce site est en cours de développement ! Attention, site généré par des moyens informatiques à partir de corpus bruts. Les informations ne sont donc pas validées.

Serveur d'exploration sur le patient édenté

The effect of implant design on insertion torque and immediate micromotion

The effect of implant design on insertion torque and immediate micromotion

Source :

English descriptors

Abstract

Links to Exploration step

Le document en format XML

Pour manipuler ce document sous Unix (Dilib)

Pour mettre un lien sur cette page dans le réseau Wicri