Long‐term outcome of implants placed with guided bone regeneration (GBR) using resorbable and non‐resorbable membranes after 12–14 years
Identifieur interne : 007491 ( Istex/Corpus ); précédent : 007490; suivant : 007492Long‐term outcome of implants placed with guided bone regeneration (GBR) using resorbable and non‐resorbable membranes after 12–14 years
Auteurs : Ronald E. Jung ; Nadine Fenner ; Christoph H. F. H Mmerle ; Nicola U. ZitzmannSource :
- Clinical Oral Implants Research [ 0905-7161 ] ; 2013-10.
English descriptors
- KwdEn :
- Abutment margin, Augmentation, Average bone loss, Barrier membranes, Bone augmentation, Bone level, Bone loss, Bone mineral, Bone regeneration, Buccal aspect, Clin, Clinical data, Clinical implant dentistry, Clinical periodontology, Clinical situation, Clinical study, Control group, Crown margins, Cumulative implant survival rate, Cumulative survival rate, Dahlin, Dental implant placement, Dental implants, Dental material science, Different types, Distal aspect, Entire study population, Eptfe membranes, Fenestration defects, Former study, Hammerle, High survival rate, Impl, Implant, Implant failures, Implant location, Implant loss, Implant placement, Implant site, Implant survival, Implant survival rate, Implants research, International journal, John wiley sons, John wiley sons jung, Jung, Keratinized mucosa, Longitudinal studies, Mand mandible, Mandible, Marginal bone level, Maxi maxilla, Maxilla, Maxillofacial, Membrane, Membrane exposure, Membrane technique, Mstl, Multiple implants, Native bone, Nonresorbable membranes, Nyman, Observation period, Online publication, Oral impl, Oral maxillofacial implants, Original study population, Pairwise differences, Periodontal probe, Personal questionnaire, Pinheiro bates, Pocket depth, Present investigation, Present study, Pristine bone, Prospective study, Radiograph, Radiographic, Radiographic evaluation, Radiographic examination, Range years, Recent study, Regenerated bone, Regeneration, Removable prosthodontics, Representative case, Resorbable, Single implant, Splinted implants, Standard errors, Statistical analysis, Submucosal position, Supramucosal position, Survival rate, Survival rates, Systematic review, Systematic reviews, Tissue level, Tissue regeneration, Titanium implants, Treatment groups, Treatment modalities, Years table, Zitzmann.
- Teeft :
- Abutment margin, Augmentation, Average bone loss, Barrier membranes, Bone augmentation, Bone level, Bone loss, Bone mineral, Bone regeneration, Buccal aspect, Clin, Clinical data, Clinical implant dentistry, Clinical periodontology, Clinical situation, Clinical study, Control group, Crown margins, Cumulative implant survival rate, Cumulative survival rate, Dahlin, Dental implant placement, Dental implants, Dental material science, Different types, Distal aspect, Entire study population, Eptfe membranes, Fenestration defects, Former study, Hammerle, High survival rate, Impl, Implant, Implant failures, Implant location, Implant loss, Implant placement, Implant site, Implant survival, Implant survival rate, Implants research, International journal, John wiley sons, John wiley sons jung, Jung, Keratinized mucosa, Longitudinal studies, Mand mandible, Mandible, Marginal bone level, Maxi maxilla, Maxilla, Maxillofacial, Membrane, Membrane exposure, Membrane technique, Mstl, Multiple implants, Native bone, Nonresorbable membranes, Nyman, Observation period, Online publication, Oral impl, Oral maxillofacial implants, Original study population, Pairwise differences, Periodontal probe, Personal questionnaire, Pinheiro bates, Pocket depth, Present investigation, Present study, Pristine bone, Prospective study, Radiograph, Radiographic, Radiographic evaluation, Radiographic examination, Range years, Recent study, Regenerated bone, Regeneration, Removable prosthodontics, Representative case, Resorbable, Single implant, Splinted implants, Standard errors, Statistical analysis, Submucosal position, Supramucosal position, Survival rate, Survival rates, Systematic review, Systematic reviews, Tissue level, Tissue regeneration, Titanium implants, Treatment groups, Treatment modalities, Years table, Zitzmann.
Abstract
The aim of the present prospective study was to evaluate the long‐term outcome of implants placed simultaneously with guided bone regeneration (GBR) using resorbable and non‐resorbable membranes.
Url:
DOI: 10.1111/j.1600-0501.2012.02522.x
Links to Exploration step
ISTEX:EC005241427958EBA78FFA8B498D95D2F7659496Le document en format XML
<record><TEI wicri:istexFullTextTei="biblStruct"><teiHeader><fileDesc><titleStmt><title xml:lang="en">Long‐term outcome of implants placed with guided bone regeneration (GBR) using resorbable and non‐resorbable membranes after 12–14 years</title><author><name sortKey="Jung, Ronald E" sort="Jung, Ronald E" uniqKey="Jung R" first="Ronald E." last="Jung">Ronald E. Jung</name><affiliation><mods:affiliation>Department of Fixed and Removable Prosthodontics and Dental Material Science, University of Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland</mods:affiliation></affiliation><affiliation><mods:affiliation>Department of Fixed and Removable Prosthodontics andDental Material ScienceDental School, University of ZurichPlattenstrasse 11CH‐8028 Zurich, SwitzerlandTel.: +41 44 634 32 51Fax: +41 44 634 43 05e‐mail:</mods:affiliation></affiliation><affiliation><mods:affiliation>E-mail: ronald.jung@zzm.uzh.ch</mods:affiliation></affiliation></author><author><name sortKey="Fenner, Nadine" sort="Fenner, Nadine" uniqKey="Fenner N" first="Nadine" last="Fenner">Nadine Fenner</name><affiliation><mods:affiliation>Department of Fixed and Removable Prosthodontics and Dental Material Science, University of Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland</mods:affiliation></affiliation></author><author><name sortKey="H Mmerle, Christoph H F" sort="H Mmerle, Christoph H F" uniqKey="H Mmerle C" first="Christoph H. F." last="H Mmerle">Christoph H. F. H Mmerle</name><affiliation><mods:affiliation>Department of Fixed and Removable Prosthodontics and Dental Material Science, University of Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland</mods:affiliation></affiliation></author><author><name sortKey="Zitzmann, Nicola U" sort="Zitzmann, Nicola U" uniqKey="Zitzmann N" first="Nicola U." last="Zitzmann">Nicola U. Zitzmann</name><affiliation><mods:affiliation>Clinic for Periodontology, Endodontology and Cariology, University of Basel, Basel, Switzerland</mods:affiliation></affiliation></author></titleStmt><publicationStmt><idno type="wicri:source">ISTEX</idno><idno type="RBID">ISTEX:EC005241427958EBA78FFA8B498D95D2F7659496</idno><date when="2013" year="2013">2013</date><idno type="doi">10.1111/j.1600-0501.2012.02522.x</idno><idno type="url">https://api.istex.fr/document/EC005241427958EBA78FFA8B498D95D2F7659496/fulltext/pdf</idno><idno type="wicri:Area/Istex/Corpus">007491</idno><idno type="wicri:explorRef" wicri:stream="Istex" wicri:step="Corpus" wicri:corpus="ISTEX">007491</idno></publicationStmt><sourceDesc><biblStruct><analytic><title level="a" type="main">Long‐term outcome of implants placed with guided bone regeneration (<hi rend="fc">GBR</hi>) using resorbable and non‐resorbable membranes after 12–14 years</title><author><name sortKey="Jung, Ronald E" sort="Jung, Ronald E" uniqKey="Jung R" first="Ronald E." last="Jung">Ronald E. Jung</name><affiliation><mods:affiliation>Department of Fixed and Removable Prosthodontics and Dental Material Science, University of Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland</mods:affiliation></affiliation><affiliation><mods:affiliation>Department of Fixed and Removable Prosthodontics andDental Material ScienceDental School, University of ZurichPlattenstrasse 11CH‐8028 Zurich, SwitzerlandTel.: +41 44 634 32 51Fax: +41 44 634 43 05e‐mail:</mods:affiliation></affiliation><affiliation><mods:affiliation>E-mail: ronald.jung@zzm.uzh.ch</mods:affiliation></affiliation></author><author><name sortKey="Fenner, Nadine" sort="Fenner, Nadine" uniqKey="Fenner N" first="Nadine" last="Fenner">Nadine Fenner</name><affiliation><mods:affiliation>Department of Fixed and Removable Prosthodontics and Dental Material Science, University of Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland</mods:affiliation></affiliation></author><author><name sortKey="H Mmerle, Christoph H F" sort="H Mmerle, Christoph H F" uniqKey="H Mmerle C" first="Christoph H. F." last="H Mmerle">Christoph H. F. H Mmerle</name><affiliation><mods:affiliation>Department of Fixed and Removable Prosthodontics and Dental Material Science, University of Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland</mods:affiliation></affiliation></author><author><name sortKey="Zitzmann, Nicola U" sort="Zitzmann, Nicola U" uniqKey="Zitzmann N" first="Nicola U." last="Zitzmann">Nicola U. Zitzmann</name><affiliation><mods:affiliation>Clinic for Periodontology, Endodontology and Cariology, University of Basel, Basel, Switzerland</mods:affiliation></affiliation></author></analytic><monogr></monogr><series><title level="j" type="main">Clinical Oral Implants Research</title><title level="j" type="alt">CLINICAL ORAL IMPLANTS RESEARCH</title><idno type="ISSN">0905-7161</idno><idno type="eISSN">1600-0501</idno><imprint><biblScope unit="vol">24</biblScope><biblScope unit="issue">10</biblScope><biblScope unit="page" from="1065">1065</biblScope><biblScope unit="page" to="1073">1073</biblScope><biblScope unit="page-count">9</biblScope><date type="published" when="2013-10">2013-10</date></imprint><idno type="ISSN">0905-7161</idno></series></biblStruct></sourceDesc><seriesStmt><idno type="ISSN">0905-7161</idno></seriesStmt></fileDesc><profileDesc><textClass><keywords scheme="KwdEn" xml:lang="en"><term>Abutment margin</term><term>Augmentation</term><term>Average bone loss</term><term>Barrier membranes</term><term>Bone augmentation</term><term>Bone level</term><term>Bone loss</term><term>Bone mineral</term><term>Bone regeneration</term><term>Buccal aspect</term><term>Clin</term><term>Clinical data</term><term>Clinical implant dentistry</term><term>Clinical periodontology</term><term>Clinical situation</term><term>Clinical study</term><term>Control group</term><term>Crown margins</term><term>Cumulative implant survival rate</term><term>Cumulative survival rate</term><term>Dahlin</term><term>Dental implant placement</term><term>Dental implants</term><term>Dental material science</term><term>Different types</term><term>Distal aspect</term><term>Entire study population</term><term>Eptfe membranes</term><term>Fenestration defects</term><term>Former study</term><term>Hammerle</term><term>High survival rate</term><term>Impl</term><term>Implant</term><term>Implant failures</term><term>Implant location</term><term>Implant loss</term><term>Implant placement</term><term>Implant site</term><term>Implant survival</term><term>Implant survival rate</term><term>Implants research</term><term>International journal</term><term>John wiley sons</term><term>John wiley sons jung</term><term>Jung</term><term>Keratinized mucosa</term><term>Longitudinal studies</term><term>Mand mandible</term><term>Mandible</term><term>Marginal bone level</term><term>Maxi maxilla</term><term>Maxilla</term><term>Maxillofacial</term><term>Membrane</term><term>Membrane exposure</term><term>Membrane technique</term><term>Mstl</term><term>Multiple implants</term><term>Native bone</term><term>Nonresorbable membranes</term><term>Nyman</term><term>Observation period</term><term>Online publication</term><term>Oral impl</term><term>Oral maxillofacial implants</term><term>Original study population</term><term>Pairwise differences</term><term>Periodontal probe</term><term>Personal questionnaire</term><term>Pinheiro bates</term><term>Pocket depth</term><term>Present investigation</term><term>Present study</term><term>Pristine bone</term><term>Prospective study</term><term>Radiograph</term><term>Radiographic</term><term>Radiographic evaluation</term><term>Radiographic examination</term><term>Range years</term><term>Recent study</term><term>Regenerated bone</term><term>Regeneration</term><term>Removable prosthodontics</term><term>Representative case</term><term>Resorbable</term><term>Single implant</term><term>Splinted implants</term><term>Standard errors</term><term>Statistical analysis</term><term>Submucosal position</term><term>Supramucosal position</term><term>Survival rate</term><term>Survival rates</term><term>Systematic review</term><term>Systematic reviews</term><term>Tissue level</term><term>Tissue regeneration</term><term>Titanium implants</term><term>Treatment groups</term><term>Treatment modalities</term><term>Years table</term><term>Zitzmann</term></keywords><keywords scheme="Teeft" xml:lang="en"><term>Abutment margin</term><term>Augmentation</term><term>Average bone loss</term><term>Barrier membranes</term><term>Bone augmentation</term><term>Bone level</term><term>Bone loss</term><term>Bone mineral</term><term>Bone regeneration</term><term>Buccal aspect</term><term>Clin</term><term>Clinical data</term><term>Clinical implant dentistry</term><term>Clinical periodontology</term><term>Clinical situation</term><term>Clinical study</term><term>Control group</term><term>Crown margins</term><term>Cumulative implant survival rate</term><term>Cumulative survival rate</term><term>Dahlin</term><term>Dental implant placement</term><term>Dental implants</term><term>Dental material science</term><term>Different types</term><term>Distal aspect</term><term>Entire study population</term><term>Eptfe membranes</term><term>Fenestration defects</term><term>Former study</term><term>Hammerle</term><term>High survival rate</term><term>Impl</term><term>Implant</term><term>Implant failures</term><term>Implant location</term><term>Implant loss</term><term>Implant placement</term><term>Implant site</term><term>Implant survival</term><term>Implant survival rate</term><term>Implants research</term><term>International journal</term><term>John wiley sons</term><term>John wiley sons jung</term><term>Jung</term><term>Keratinized mucosa</term><term>Longitudinal studies</term><term>Mand mandible</term><term>Mandible</term><term>Marginal bone level</term><term>Maxi maxilla</term><term>Maxilla</term><term>Maxillofacial</term><term>Membrane</term><term>Membrane exposure</term><term>Membrane technique</term><term>Mstl</term><term>Multiple implants</term><term>Native bone</term><term>Nonresorbable membranes</term><term>Nyman</term><term>Observation period</term><term>Online publication</term><term>Oral impl</term><term>Oral maxillofacial implants</term><term>Original study population</term><term>Pairwise differences</term><term>Periodontal probe</term><term>Personal questionnaire</term><term>Pinheiro bates</term><term>Pocket depth</term><term>Present investigation</term><term>Present study</term><term>Pristine bone</term><term>Prospective study</term><term>Radiograph</term><term>Radiographic</term><term>Radiographic evaluation</term><term>Radiographic examination</term><term>Range years</term><term>Recent study</term><term>Regenerated bone</term><term>Regeneration</term><term>Removable prosthodontics</term><term>Representative case</term><term>Resorbable</term><term>Single implant</term><term>Splinted implants</term><term>Standard errors</term><term>Statistical analysis</term><term>Submucosal position</term><term>Supramucosal position</term><term>Survival rate</term><term>Survival rates</term><term>Systematic review</term><term>Systematic reviews</term><term>Tissue level</term><term>Tissue regeneration</term><term>Titanium implants</term><term>Treatment groups</term><term>Treatment modalities</term><term>Years table</term><term>Zitzmann</term></keywords></textClass></profileDesc></teiHeader><front><div type="abstract">The aim of the present prospective study was to evaluate the long‐term outcome of implants placed simultaneously with guided bone regeneration (GBR) using resorbable and non‐resorbable membranes.</div></front></TEI><istex><corpusName>wiley</corpusName><keywords><teeft><json:string>implant</json:string><json:string>jung</json:string><json:string>hammerle</json:string><json:string>bone regeneration</json:string><json:string>control group</json:string><json:string>zitzmann</json:string><json:string>radiographic</json:string><json:string>mstl</json:string><json:string>present study</json:string><json:string>resorbable</json:string><json:string>radiograph</json:string><json:string>international journal</json:string><json:string>impl</json:string><json:string>marginal bone level</json:string><json:string>oral impl</json:string><json:string>clin</json:string><json:string>regeneration</json:string><json:string>implants research</json:string><json:string>maxillofacial</json:string><json:string>implant placement</json:string><json:string>standard errors</json:string><json:string>dahlin</json:string><json:string>nyman</json:string><json:string>clinical situation</json:string><json:string>augmentation</json:string><json:string>oral maxillofacial implants</json:string><json:string>survival rate</json:string><json:string>mandible</json:string><json:string>maxilla</json:string><json:string>treatment groups</json:string><json:string>implant survival</json:string><json:string>bone level</json:string><json:string>supramucosal position</json:string><json:string>dental implants</json:string><json:string>keratinized mucosa</json:string><json:string>removable prosthodontics</json:string><json:string>membrane</json:string><json:string>john wiley sons</json:string><json:string>present investigation</json:string><json:string>barrier membranes</json:string><json:string>pocket depth</json:string><json:string>john wiley sons jung</json:string><json:string>bone loss</json:string><json:string>splinted implants</json:string><json:string>cumulative survival rate</json:string><json:string>bone augmentation</json:string><json:string>original study population</json:string><json:string>crown margins</json:string><json:string>abutment margin</json:string><json:string>dental material science</json:string><json:string>regenerated bone</json:string><json:string>tissue regeneration</json:string><json:string>different types</json:string><json:string>statistical analysis</json:string><json:string>representative case</json:string><json:string>buccal aspect</json:string><json:string>clinical study</json:string><json:string>pristine bone</json:string><json:string>range years</json:string><json:string>titanium implants</json:string><json:string>recent study</json:string><json:string>radiographic examination</json:string><json:string>implant site</json:string><json:string>maxi maxilla</json:string><json:string>mand mandible</json:string><json:string>radiographic evaluation</json:string><json:string>implant failures</json:string><json:string>distal aspect</json:string><json:string>former study</json:string><json:string>treatment modalities</json:string><json:string>nonresorbable membranes</json:string><json:string>pairwise differences</json:string><json:string>years table</json:string><json:string>pinheiro bates</json:string><json:string>single implant</json:string><json:string>clinical data</json:string><json:string>entire study population</json:string><json:string>tissue level</json:string><json:string>longitudinal studies</json:string><json:string>multiple implants</json:string><json:string>systematic reviews</json:string><json:string>survival rates</json:string><json:string>implant survival rate</json:string><json:string>membrane exposure</json:string><json:string>dental implant placement</json:string><json:string>systematic review</json:string><json:string>fenestration defects</json:string><json:string>observation period</json:string><json:string>average bone loss</json:string><json:string>implant loss</json:string><json:string>periodontal probe</json:string><json:string>online publication</json:string><json:string>native bone</json:string><json:string>eptfe membranes</json:string><json:string>clinical implant dentistry</json:string><json:string>high survival rate</json:string><json:string>prospective study</json:string><json:string>cumulative implant survival rate</json:string><json:string>implant location</json:string><json:string>bone mineral</json:string><json:string>submucosal position</json:string><json:string>personal questionnaire</json:string><json:string>membrane technique</json:string><json:string>clinical periodontology</json:string></teeft></keywords><author><json:item><name>Ronald E. Jung</name><affiliations><json:string>Department of Fixed and Removable Prosthodontics and Dental Material Science, University of Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland</json:string><json:string>Department of Fixed and Removable Prosthodontics andDental Material ScienceDental School, University of ZurichPlattenstrasse 11CH‐8028 Zurich, SwitzerlandTel.: +41 44 634 32 51Fax: +41 44 634 43 05e‐mail:</json:string><json:string>E-mail: ronald.jung@zzm.uzh.ch</json:string></affiliations></json:item><json:item><name>Nadine Fenner</name><affiliations><json:string>Department of Fixed and Removable Prosthodontics and Dental Material Science, University of Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland</json:string></affiliations></json:item><json:item><name>Christoph H. F. Hämmerle</name><affiliations><json:string>Department of Fixed and Removable Prosthodontics and Dental Material Science, University of Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland</json:string></affiliations></json:item><json:item><name>Nicola U. Zitzmann</name><affiliations><json:string>Clinic for Periodontology, Endodontology and Cariology, University of Basel, Basel, Switzerland</json:string></affiliations></json:item></author><subject><json:item><lang><json:string>eng</json:string></lang><value>bone regeneration</value></json:item><json:item><lang><json:string>eng</json:string></lang><value>bone substitute</value></json:item><json:item><lang><json:string>eng</json:string></lang><value>bone transplantation</value></json:item><json:item><lang><json:string>eng</json:string></lang><value>dental implant</value></json:item><json:item><lang><json:string>eng</json:string></lang><value>graft material</value></json:item><json:item><lang><json:string>eng</json:string></lang><value>human</value></json:item><json:item><lang><json:string>eng</json:string></lang><value>membranes</value></json:item></subject><articleId><json:string>CLR2522</json:string></articleId><arkIstex>ark:/67375/WNG-XGPFD4QC-F</arkIstex><language><json:string>eng</json:string></language><originalGenre><json:string>article</json:string></originalGenre><abstract>The aim of the present prospective study was to evaluate the long‐term outcome of implants placed simultaneously with guided bone regeneration (GBR) using resorbable and non‐resorbable membranes.</abstract><qualityIndicators><score>7.324</score><pdfWordCount>5278</pdfWordCount><pdfCharCount>33903</pdfCharCount><pdfVersion>1.7</pdfVersion><pdfPageCount>9</pdfPageCount><pdfPageSize>595.276 x 782.362 pts</pdfPageSize><refBibsNative>true</refBibsNative><abstractWordCount>27</abstractWordCount><abstractCharCount>195</abstractCharCount><keywordCount>7</keywordCount></qualityIndicators><title>Long‐term outcome of implants placed with guided bone regeneration (GBR) using resorbable and non‐resorbable membranes after 12–14 years</title><pmid><json:string>22697628</json:string></pmid><genre><json:string>article</json:string></genre><host><title>Clinical Oral Implants Research</title><language><json:string>unknown</json:string></language><doi><json:string>10.1111/(ISSN)1600-0501</json:string></doi><issn><json:string>0905-7161</json:string></issn><eissn><json:string>1600-0501</json:string></eissn><publisherId><json:string>CLR</json:string></publisherId><volume>24</volume><issue>10</issue><pages><first>1065</first><last>1073</last><total>9</total></pages><genre><json:string>journal</json:string></genre><subject><json:item><value>Original Research</value></json:item></subject></host><namedEntities><unitex><date><json:string>2009</json:string><json:string>2012-05-23</json:string><json:string>2001</json:string><json:string>2002</json:string><json:string>2007</json:string><json:string>1200</json:string></date><geogName></geogName><orgName><json:string>Switzerland Corresponding</json:string><json:string>University of Zurich, Switzerland</json:string><json:string>University of Basel</json:string><json:string>University of Zurich Plattenstrasse</json:string><json:string>University of Zurich</json:string><json:string>Department of Fixed and Removable Prosthodontics</json:string><json:string>Switzerland Tel</json:string><json:string>Switzerland Nicola U</json:string></orgName><orgName_funder></orgName_funder><orgName_provider></orgName_provider><persName><json:string>John Wiley</json:string><json:string>Science</json:string><json:string>Nadine Fenner</json:string><json:string>Ronald E. Jung</json:string><json:string>W.L. Gore</json:string><json:string>Dieter</json:string><json:string>H. F. Hammerle</json:string></persName><placeName><json:string>Switzerland</json:string><json:string>Germany</json:string><json:string>Mannheim</json:string><json:string>Basel</json:string><json:string>Palm Beach</json:string><json:string>Sweden</json:string><json:string>Zurich</json:string></placeName><ref_url></ref_url><ref_bibl><json:string>Oda et al. 2004</json:string><json:string>Chiapasco & Gatti 2004</json:string><json:string>Moses et al. 2005</json:string><json:string>Simion et al. 1994</json:string><json:string>Bergenblock et al. 2010</json:string><json:string>Simonis et al. 2010</json:string><json:string>Rodoni et al. 2005</json:string><json:string>Dahlin et al. 1991a,b</json:string><json:string>Zitzmann et al. 1997</json:string><json:string>Hammerle et al. 1996</json:string><json:string>Buser et al. 1996</json:string><json:string>Penarrocha-Diago et al. 2006</json:string><json:string>Zitzmann et al. 1997, 2001</json:string><json:string>Therneau 2009</json:string><json:string>Simion et al. 1998</json:string><json:string>Nyman et al. 1990</json:string><json:string>Blanco et al. 2005</json:string><json:string>Ainamo & Bay 1975</json:string><json:string>Hammerle et al. 2002</json:string><json:string>Walker 2005</json:string><json:string>Nyman & Lang 1994</json:string><json:string>Donos et al. 2008</json:string><json:string>Enislidis et al. 2006</json:string><json:string>Jung et al</json:string><json:string>Becker et al. 1999</json:string><json:string>Benic et al. 2009</json:string><json:string>Pinheiro & Bates 2000</json:string><json:string>Weber et al. 1992</json:string><json:string>Zitzmann et al. 2001</json:string></ref_bibl><bibl></bibl></unitex></namedEntities><ark><json:string>ark:/67375/WNG-XGPFD4QC-F</json:string></ark><categories><wos><json:string>1 - science</json:string><json:string>2 - engineering, biomedical</json:string><json:string>2 - dentistry, oral surgery & medicine</json:string></wos><scienceMetrix><json:string>1 - health sciences</json:string><json:string>2 - clinical medicine</json:string><json:string>3 - dentistry</json:string></scienceMetrix><scopus><json:string>1 - Health Sciences</json:string><json:string>2 - Dentistry</json:string><json:string>3 - Oral Surgery</json:string></scopus></categories><publicationDate>2013</publicationDate><copyrightDate>2013</copyrightDate><doi><json:string>10.1111/j.1600-0501.2012.02522.x</json:string></doi><id>EC005241427958EBA78FFA8B498D95D2F7659496</id><score>1</score><fulltext><json:item><extension>pdf</extension><original>true</original><mimetype>application/pdf</mimetype><uri>https://api.istex.fr/document/EC005241427958EBA78FFA8B498D95D2F7659496/fulltext/pdf</uri></json:item><json:item><extension>zip</extension><original>false</original><mimetype>application/zip</mimetype><uri>https://api.istex.fr/document/EC005241427958EBA78FFA8B498D95D2F7659496/fulltext/zip</uri></json:item><istex:fulltextTEI uri="https://api.istex.fr/document/EC005241427958EBA78FFA8B498D95D2F7659496/fulltext/tei"><teiHeader><fileDesc><titleStmt><title level="a" type="main">Long‐term outcome of implants placed with guided bone regeneration (<hi rend="fc">GBR</hi>) using resorbable and non‐resorbable membranes after 12–14 years</title></titleStmt><publicationStmt><authority>ISTEX</authority><publisher>Wiley Publishing Ltd</publisher><availability><licence>© 2012 John Wiley & Sons A/S</licence></availability><date type="published" when="2013-10"></date></publicationStmt><notesStmt><note type="content-type" subtype="article" source="article" scheme="https://content-type.data.istex.fr/ark:/67375/XTP-6N5SZHKN-D">article</note><note type="publication-type" subtype="journal" scheme="https://publication-type.data.istex.fr/ark:/67375/JMC-0GLKJH51-B">journal</note></notesStmt><sourceDesc><biblStruct type="article"><analytic><title level="a" type="main">Long‐term outcome of implants placed with guided bone regeneration (<hi rend="fc">GBR</hi>) using resorbable and non‐resorbable membranes after 12–14 years</title><author xml:id="author-0000" role="corresp"><persName><forename type="first">Ronald E.</forename><surname>Jung</surname></persName><affiliation><orgName>Department of Fixed and Removable Prosthodontics and Dental Material Science</orgName><orgName>University of Zurich</orgName><address><settlement type="city">Zurich</settlement><country key="CH">Switzerland</country></address></affiliation><affiliation>Corresponding author: PD Dr. Ronald E. Jung Department of Fixed and Removable Prosthodontics and Dental Material Science Dental School, University of Zurich Plattenstrasse 11 CH‐8028 Zurich, Switzerland Tel.: +41 44 634 32 51 Fax: +41 44 634 43 05 e‐mail: ronald.jung@zzm.uzh.ch</affiliation></author><author xml:id="author-0001"><persName><forename type="first">Nadine</forename><surname>Fenner</surname></persName><affiliation><orgName>Department of Fixed and Removable Prosthodontics and Dental Material Science</orgName><orgName>University of Zurich</orgName><address><settlement type="city">Zurich</settlement><country key="CH">Switzerland</country></address></affiliation></author><author xml:id="author-0002"><persName><forename type="first">Christoph H. F.</forename><surname>Hämmerle</surname></persName><affiliation><orgName>Department of Fixed and Removable Prosthodontics and Dental Material Science</orgName><orgName>University of Zurich</orgName><address><settlement type="city">Zurich</settlement><country key="CH">Switzerland</country></address></affiliation></author><author xml:id="author-0003"><persName><forename type="first">Nicola U.</forename><surname>Zitzmann</surname></persName><affiliation><orgName>Clinic for Periodontology, Endodontology and Cariology</orgName><orgName>University of Basel</orgName><address><settlement type="city">Basel</settlement><country key="CH">Switzerland</country></address></affiliation></author><idno type="istex">EC005241427958EBA78FFA8B498D95D2F7659496</idno><idno type="ark">ark:/67375/WNG-XGPFD4QC-F</idno><idno type="DOI">10.1111/j.1600-0501.2012.02522.x</idno><idno type="unit">CLR2522</idno><idno type="toTypesetVersion">file:CLR.CLR2522.pdf</idno></analytic><monogr><title level="j" type="main">Clinical Oral Implants Research</title><title level="j" type="alt">CLINICAL ORAL IMPLANTS RESEARCH</title><idno type="pISSN">0905-7161</idno><idno type="eISSN">1600-0501</idno><idno type="book-DOI">10.1111/(ISSN)1600-0501</idno><idno type="book-part-DOI">10.1111/clr.2013.24.issue-10</idno><idno type="product">CLR</idno><imprint><biblScope unit="vol">24</biblScope><biblScope unit="issue">10</biblScope><biblScope unit="page" from="1065">1065</biblScope><biblScope unit="page" to="1073">1073</biblScope><biblScope unit="page-count">9</biblScope><date type="published" when="2013-10"></date></imprint></monogr></biblStruct></sourceDesc></fileDesc><profileDesc><abstract style="main" xml:id="clr2522-abs-0001"><head>Abstract</head>
Aim
<p>The aim of the present prospective study was to evaluate the long‐term outcome of implants placed simultaneously with guided bone regeneration (<hi rend="fc">GBR</hi>) using resorbable and non‐resorbable membranes.</p>
Materials and methods
<p>The original study population consisted of 72 patients receiving a total of 265 implants. In all <hi rend="fc">GBR</hi>‐treated sites, demineralized bovine bone mineral (<hi rend="fc">DBBM</hi>) was used in combination either with a collagen (<hi rend="fc">CM</hi>) or an Expanded polytetrafluoroethylene (e‐<hi rend="fc">PTFE</hi>) membrane. A total of 112 implants was treated with <hi rend="fc">CM</hi>, 41 implants were treated with e‐<hi rend="fc">PTFE</hi> membranes, and 112 served as a control group because implants were entirely surrounded by bone and did not need any <hi rend="fc">GBR</hi> procedures. Clinical and radiographic analyses were performed after a period of 12–14 years.</p>
Results
<p>The median follow‐up time was 12.5 years (range 12–14 years). A total of 58 patients participated in the present investigation, corresponding to 80.5% of the original study population. The cumulative implant survival rate at the follow‐up examination was 93.2%. For the control group the cumulative survival rate was 94.6%, for the <hi rend="fc">CM</hi> 91.9%, and for the e‐<hi rend="fc">PTFE</hi> 92.6%. Differences among the groups were not statistically significant.</p><p>The radiographically determined marginal bone level (<hi rend="fc">MBL</hi>) amounted to: control 2.36 mm (<hi rend="fc">SD</hi>), <hi rend="fc">CM</hi> 2.4 mm (<hi rend="fc">SD</hi>), e‐<hi rend="fc">PTFE</hi> 2.53 mm (<hi rend="fc">SD</hi>). There is no evidence (<hi rend="italic">P </hi>< 0.2) that the slope of bone level over time is different for the three treatment groups.</p>
Conclusion
<p>It is concluded that implants placed simultaneously with <hi rend="fc">GBR</hi> procedures using resorbable or non‐resorbable membranes reveal a high survival rate ranging from 91.9% to 92.6%, therefore it is considered to be a safe and predictable therapy. [Correction added after online publication 30 November 2012: the marginal bone level of CM, e‐PTFE, and control was corrected to ‘control 2.36 mm (<hi rend="fc">SD</hi>), <hi rend="fc">CM</hi> 2.4 mm (<hi rend="fc">SD</hi>), e‐<hi rend="fc">PTFE</hi> 2.53 mm (<hi rend="fc">SD</hi>)’ in the Results section]</p></abstract><textClass><keywords><term xml:id="clr2522-kwd-0001">bone regeneration</term><term xml:id="clr2522-kwd-0002">bone substitute</term><term xml:id="clr2522-kwd-0003">bone transplantation</term><term xml:id="clr2522-kwd-0004">dental implant</term><term xml:id="clr2522-kwd-0005">graft material</term><term xml:id="clr2522-kwd-0006">human</term><term xml:id="clr2522-kwd-0007">membranes</term></keywords><keywords rend="articleCategory"><term>Original Research</term></keywords><keywords rend="tocHeading1"><term>Original Articles</term></keywords></textClass><langUsage><language ident="en"></language></langUsage></profileDesc></teiHeader></istex:fulltextTEI><json:item><extension>txt</extension><original>false</original><mimetype>text/plain</mimetype><uri>https://api.istex.fr/document/EC005241427958EBA78FFA8B498D95D2F7659496/fulltext/txt</uri></json:item></fulltext><metadata><istex:metadataXml wicri:clean="Wiley, elements deleted: body"><istex:xmlDeclaration>version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" standalone="yes"</istex:xmlDeclaration><istex:document><component type="serialArticle" version="2.0" xml:id="clr2522" xml:lang="en"><header><publicationMeta level="product"><doi origin="wiley" registered="yes">10.1111/(ISSN)1600-0501</doi><issn type="print">0905-7161</issn><issn type="electronic">1600-0501</issn><idGroup><id type="product" value="CLR"></id></idGroup><titleGroup><title sort="CLINICAL ORAL IMPLANTS RESEARCH" type="main">Clinical Oral Implants Research</title><title type="short">Clin. Oral Impl. Res.</title></titleGroup></publicationMeta><publicationMeta level="part" position="100"><doi origin="wiley">10.1111/clr.2013.24.issue-10</doi><copyright ownership="publisher">Copyright © 2013 John Wiley & Sons A/S. Published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd</copyright><numberingGroup><numbering type="journalVolume" number="24">24</numbering><numbering type="journalIssue">10</numbering></numberingGroup><coverDate startDate="2013-10">October 2013</coverDate></publicationMeta><publicationMeta level="unit" position="10" status="forIssue" type="article"><doi>10.1111/j.1600-0501.2012.02522.x</doi><idGroup><id type="unit" value="CLR2522"></id></idGroup><countGroup><count number="9" type="pageTotal"></count></countGroup><titleGroup><title type="articleCategory">Original Research</title><title type="tocHeading1">Original Articles</title></titleGroup><copyright ownership="publisher">© 2012 John Wiley & Sons A/S</copyright><eventGroup><event date="2012-05-11" type="manuscriptAccepted"></event><event agent="SPS" date="2012-05-23" type="xmlCreated"></event><event type="publishedOnlineEarlyUnpaginated" date="2012-06-15"></event><event type="firstOnline" date="2012-06-15"></event><event type="publishedOnlineFinalForm" date="2013-09-03"></event><event type="xmlConverted" agent="Converter:WILEY_ML3G_TO_WILEY_ML3GV2 version:4.0.1" date="2014-03-12"></event><event type="xmlConverted" agent="Converter:WML3G_To_WML3G version:4.6.4 mode:FullText" date="2015-10-01"></event></eventGroup><numberingGroup><numbering type="pageFirst">1065</numbering><numbering type="pageLast">1073</numbering></numberingGroup><correspondenceTo><lineatedText><line><b>Corresponding author:</b></line><line><i>PD Dr. Ronald E. Jung</i></line><line>Department of Fixed and Removable Prosthodontics and</line><line>Dental Material Science</line><line>Dental School, University of Zurich</line><line>Plattenstrasse 11</line><line>CH‐8028 Zurich, Switzerland</line><line>Tel.: +41 44 634 32 51</line><line>Fax: +41 44 634 43 05</line><line>e‐mail: <email>ronald.jung@zzm.uzh.ch</email></line></lineatedText></correspondenceTo><selfCitationGroup><citation type="self" xml:id="clr2522-cit-1001"><author><familyName>Jung</familyName> <givenNames>R.E.</givenNames></author>, <author><familyName>Fenner</familyName>, <givenNames>N</givenNames></author>, <author><familyName>Hämmerle</familyName> <givenNames>C.H.F.</givenNames></author> & <author><familyName>Zitzmann</familyName> <givenNames>N.U.</givenNames></author>. <articleTitle>Long‐term outcome of implants placed with guided bone regeneration (<fc>GBR</fc>) using resorbable and non‐resorbable membranes after 12–14 years</articleTitle>. <journalTitle>Clinical Oral Implants Research</journalTitle>. <vol>24</vol>, <pubYear year="2013">2013</pubYear>, <pageFirst>1065</pageFirst>–<pageLast>1073</pageLast>.</citation></selfCitationGroup><linkGroup><link type="toTypesetVersion" href="file:CLR.CLR2522.pdf"></link></linkGroup></publicationMeta><contentMeta><titleGroup><title type="main">Long‐term outcome of implants placed with guided bone regeneration (<fc>GBR</fc>) using resorbable and non‐resorbable membranes after 12–14 years</title><title type="shortAuthors">Jung et al</title></titleGroup><creators><creator affiliationRef="#clr2522-aff-0001" corresponding="yes" creatorRole="author" xml:id="clr2522-cr-0001"><personName><givenNames>Ronald E.</givenNames> <familyName>Jung</familyName></personName></creator><creator affiliationRef="#clr2522-aff-0001" creatorRole="author" xml:id="clr2522-cr-0002"><personName><givenNames>Nadine</givenNames> <familyName>Fenner</familyName></personName></creator><creator affiliationRef="#clr2522-aff-0001" creatorRole="author" xml:id="clr2522-cr-0003"><personName><givenNames>Christoph H. F.</givenNames> <familyName>Hämmerle</familyName></personName></creator><creator affiliationRef="#clr2522-aff-0002" creatorRole="author" xml:id="clr2522-cr-0004"><personName><givenNames>Nicola U.</givenNames> <familyName>Zitzmann</familyName></personName></creator></creators><affiliationGroup><affiliation countryCode="CH" type="organization" xml:id="clr2522-aff-0001"><orgDiv>Department of Fixed and Removable Prosthodontics and Dental Material Science</orgDiv> <orgName>University of Zurich</orgName> <address><city>Zurich</city> <country>Switzerland</country></address></affiliation><affiliation countryCode="CH" type="organization" xml:id="clr2522-aff-0002"><orgDiv>Clinic for Periodontology, Endodontology and Cariology</orgDiv> <orgName>University of Basel</orgName> <address><city>Basel</city> <country>Switzerland</country></address></affiliation></affiliationGroup><keywordGroup type="author"><keyword xml:id="clr2522-kwd-0001">bone regeneration</keyword><keyword xml:id="clr2522-kwd-0002">bone substitute</keyword><keyword xml:id="clr2522-kwd-0003">bone transplantation</keyword><keyword xml:id="clr2522-kwd-0004">dental implant</keyword><keyword xml:id="clr2522-kwd-0005">graft material</keyword><keyword xml:id="clr2522-kwd-0006">human</keyword><keyword xml:id="clr2522-kwd-0007">membranes</keyword></keywordGroup><fundingInfo><fundingAgency>Clinic for Fixed and Removable Prosthodontics</fundingAgency></fundingInfo><fundingInfo><fundingAgency>University of Zürich</fundingAgency></fundingInfo><abstractGroup><abstract type="main" xml:id="clr2522-abs-0001"><title type="main">Abstract</title><section xml:id="clr2522-sec-0001"><title type="main">Aim</title><p>The aim of the present prospective study was to evaluate the long‐term outcome of implants placed simultaneously with guided bone regeneration (<fc>GBR</fc>) using resorbable and non‐resorbable membranes.</p></section><section xml:id="clr2522-sec-0002"><title type="main">Materials and methods</title><p>The original study population consisted of 72 patients receiving a total of 265 implants. In all <fc>GBR</fc>‐treated sites, demineralized bovine bone mineral (<fc>DBBM</fc>) was used in combination either with a collagen (<fc>CM</fc>) or an Expanded polytetrafluoroethylene (e‐<fc>PTFE</fc>) membrane. A total of 112 implants was treated with <fc>CM</fc>, 41 implants were treated with e‐<fc>PTFE</fc> membranes, and 112 served as a control group because implants were entirely surrounded by bone and did not need any <fc>GBR</fc> procedures. Clinical and radiographic analyses were performed after a period of 12–14 years.</p></section><section xml:id="clr2522-sec-0003"><title type="main">Results</title><p>The median follow‐up time was 12.5 years (range 12–14 years). A total of 58 patients participated in the present investigation, corresponding to 80.5% of the original study population. The cumulative implant survival rate at the follow‐up examination was 93.2%. For the control group the cumulative survival rate was 94.6%, for the <fc>CM</fc> 91.9%, and for the e‐<fc>PTFE</fc> 92.6%. Differences among the groups were not statistically significant.</p><p>The radiographically determined marginal bone level (<fc>MBL</fc>) amounted to: control 2.36 mm (<fc>SD</fc>), <fc>CM</fc> 2.4 mm (<fc>SD</fc>), e‐<fc>PTFE</fc> 2.53 mm (<fc>SD</fc>). There is no evidence (<i>P </i>< 0.2) that the slope of bone level over time is different for the three treatment groups.</p></section><section xml:id="clr2522-sec-0004"><title type="main">Conclusion</title><p>It is concluded that implants placed simultaneously with <fc>GBR</fc> procedures using resorbable or non‐resorbable membranes reveal a high survival rate ranging from 91.9% to 92.6%, therefore it is considered to be a safe and predictable therapy. [Correction added after online publication 30 November 2012: the marginal bone level of CM, e‐PTFE, and control was corrected to ‘control 2.36 mm (<fc>SD</fc>), <fc>CM</fc> 2.4 mm (<fc>SD</fc>), e‐<fc>PTFE</fc> 2.53 mm (<fc>SD</fc>)’ in the Results section]</p></section></abstract></abstractGroup></contentMeta></header></component></istex:document></istex:metadataXml><mods version="3.6"><titleInfo lang="en"><title>Long‐term outcome of implants placed with guided bone regeneration (GBR) using resorbable and non‐resorbable membranes after 12–14 years</title></titleInfo><titleInfo type="alternative" contentType="CDATA" lang="en"><title>Long‐term outcome of implants placed with guided bone regeneration (GBR) using resorbable and non‐resorbable membranes after 12–14 years</title></titleInfo><name type="personal"><namePart type="given">Ronald E.</namePart><namePart type="family">Jung</namePart><affiliation>Department of Fixed and Removable Prosthodontics and Dental Material Science, University of Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland</affiliation><affiliation>Department of Fixed and Removable Prosthodontics andDental Material ScienceDental School, University of ZurichPlattenstrasse 11CH‐8028 Zurich, SwitzerlandTel.: +41 44 634 32 51Fax: +41 44 634 43 05e‐mail:</affiliation><affiliation>E-mail: ronald.jung@zzm.uzh.ch</affiliation><role><roleTerm type="text">author</roleTerm></role></name><name type="personal"><namePart type="given">Nadine</namePart><namePart type="family">Fenner</namePart><affiliation>Department of Fixed and Removable Prosthodontics and Dental Material Science, University of Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland</affiliation><role><roleTerm type="text">author</roleTerm></role></name><name type="personal"><namePart type="given">Christoph H. F.</namePart><namePart type="family">Hämmerle</namePart><affiliation>Department of Fixed and Removable Prosthodontics and Dental Material Science, University of Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland</affiliation><role><roleTerm type="text">author</roleTerm></role></name><name type="personal"><namePart type="given">Nicola U.</namePart><namePart type="family">Zitzmann</namePart><affiliation>Clinic for Periodontology, Endodontology and Cariology, University of Basel, Basel, Switzerland</affiliation><role><roleTerm type="text">author</roleTerm></role></name><typeOfResource>text</typeOfResource><genre type="article" displayLabel="article" authority="ISTEX" authorityURI="https://content-type.data.istex.fr" valueURI="https://content-type.data.istex.fr/ark:/67375/XTP-6N5SZHKN-D">article</genre><originInfo><publisher>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</publisher><dateIssued encoding="w3cdtf">2013-10</dateIssued><dateCreated encoding="w3cdtf">2012-05-23</dateCreated><dateValid encoding="w3cdtf">2012-05-11</dateValid><edition>Jung R.E., Fenner, N, Hämmerle C.H.F. & Zitzmann N.U.. Long‐term outcome of implants placed with guided bone regeneration (GBR) using resorbable and non‐resorbable membranes after 12–14 years. Clinical Oral Implants Research. 24, 2013, 1065–1073.</edition><copyrightDate encoding="w3cdtf">2013</copyrightDate></originInfo><language><languageTerm type="code" authority="rfc3066">en</languageTerm><languageTerm type="code" authority="iso639-2b">eng</languageTerm></language><abstract>The aim of the present prospective study was to evaluate the long‐term outcome of implants placed simultaneously with guided bone regeneration (GBR) using resorbable and non‐resorbable membranes.</abstract><abstract>The original study population consisted of 72 patients receiving a total of 265 implants. In all GBR‐treated sites, demineralized bovine bone mineral (DBBM) was used in combination either with a collagen (CM) or an Expanded polytetrafluoroethylene (e‐PTFE) membrane. A total of 112 implants was treated with CM, 41 implants were treated with e‐PTFE membranes, and 112 served as a control group because implants were entirely surrounded by bone and did not need any GBR procedures. Clinical and radiographic analyses were performed after a period of 12–14 years.</abstract><abstract>The median follow‐up time was 12.5 years (range 12–14 years). A total of 58 patients participated in the present investigation, corresponding to 80.5% of the original study population. The cumulative implant survival rate at the follow‐up examination was 93.2%. For the control group the cumulative survival rate was 94.6%, for the CM 91.9%, and for the e‐PTFE 92.6%. Differences among the groups were not statistically significant. The radiographically determined marginal bone level (MBL) amounted to: control 2.36 mm (SD), CM 2.4 mm (SD), e‐PTFE 2.53 mm (SD). There is no evidence (P < 0.2) that the slope of bone level over time is different for the three treatment groups.</abstract><abstract>It is concluded that implants placed simultaneously with GBR procedures using resorbable or non‐resorbable membranes reveal a high survival rate ranging from 91.9% to 92.6%, therefore it is considered to be a safe and predictable therapy. [Correction added after online publication 30 November 2012: the marginal bone level of CM, e‐PTFE, and control was corrected to ‘control 2.36 mm (SD), CM 2.4 mm (SD), e‐PTFE 2.53 mm (SD)’ in the Results section]</abstract><note type="funding">Clinic for Fixed and Removable Prosthodontics</note><note type="funding">University of Zürich</note><subject><genre>keywords</genre><topic>bone regeneration</topic><topic>bone substitute</topic><topic>bone transplantation</topic><topic>dental implant</topic><topic>graft material</topic><topic>human</topic><topic>membranes</topic></subject><relatedItem type="host"><titleInfo><title>Clinical Oral Implants Research</title></titleInfo><titleInfo type="abbreviated"><title>Clin. Oral Impl. Res.</title></titleInfo><genre type="journal" authority="ISTEX" authorityURI="https://publication-type.data.istex.fr" valueURI="https://publication-type.data.istex.fr/ark:/67375/JMC-0GLKJH51-B">journal</genre><subject><genre>article-category</genre><topic>Original Research</topic></subject><identifier type="ISSN">0905-7161</identifier><identifier type="eISSN">1600-0501</identifier><identifier type="DOI">10.1111/(ISSN)1600-0501</identifier><identifier type="PublisherID">CLR</identifier><part><date>2013</date><detail type="volume"><caption>vol.</caption><number>24</number></detail><detail type="issue"><caption>no.</caption><number>10</number></detail><extent unit="pages"><start>1065</start><end>1073</end><total>9</total></extent></part></relatedItem><identifier type="istex">EC005241427958EBA78FFA8B498D95D2F7659496</identifier><identifier type="ark">ark:/67375/WNG-XGPFD4QC-F</identifier><identifier type="DOI">10.1111/j.1600-0501.2012.02522.x</identifier><identifier type="ArticleID">CLR2522</identifier><accessCondition type="use and reproduction" contentType="copyright">Copyright © 2013 John Wiley & Sons A/S. Published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd© 2012 John Wiley & Sons A/S</accessCondition><recordInfo><recordContentSource authority="ISTEX" authorityURI="https://loaded-corpus.data.istex.fr" valueURI="https://loaded-corpus.data.istex.fr/ark:/67375/XBH-L0C46X92-X">wiley</recordContentSource></recordInfo></mods><json:item><extension>json</extension><original>false</original><mimetype>application/json</mimetype><uri>https://api.istex.fr/document/EC005241427958EBA78FFA8B498D95D2F7659496/metadata/json</uri></json:item></metadata><serie></serie></istex></record>Pour manipuler ce document sous Unix (Dilib)
EXPLOR_STEP=$WICRI_ROOT/Wicri/Santé/explor/EdenteV2/Data/Istex/Corpus
HfdSelect -h $EXPLOR_STEP/biblio.hfd -nk 007491 | SxmlIndent | more
Ou
HfdSelect -h $EXPLOR_AREA/Data/Istex/Corpus/biblio.hfd -nk 007491 | SxmlIndent | more
Pour mettre un lien sur cette page dans le réseau Wicri
{{Explor lien
|wiki= Wicri/Santé
|area= EdenteV2
|flux= Istex
|étape= Corpus
|type= RBID
|clé= ISTEX:EC005241427958EBA78FFA8B498D95D2F7659496
|texte= Long‐term outcome of implants placed with guided bone regeneration (GBR) using resorbable and non‐resorbable membranes after 12–14 years
}}
| This area was generated with Dilib version V0.6.32. |  |