A Prospective Study on the Accuracy of Mucosally Supported Stereolithographic Surgical Guides in Fully Edentulous Maxillae
Identifieur interne : 007185 ( Istex/Corpus ); précédent : 007184; suivant : 007186A Prospective Study on the Accuracy of Mucosally Supported Stereolithographic Surgical Guides in Fully Edentulous Maxillae
Auteurs : Jan D'Haese ; Tommie Van De Velde ; Lucien Elaut ; Hugo De BruynSource :
- Clinical Implant Dentistry and Related Research [ 1523-0899 ] ; 2012-04.
English descriptors
- KwdEn :
- Abscess formation, Abutment, Accuracy analysis, Angular deviation, Apical, Apical deviation, Apical deviations, Apical interimplant distance, Apical point, Astra, Astra tech, Belgium, Clinical implant dentistry, Clinical trial, Consecutive patients, Coronal, Coronal interimplant distance, Cumulative percentage, Cutoff point, Dental implants, Dental school, Dentomaxillofac radiol, Deviation, Different implant length groups, Edentulous, Edentulous maxilla, Edentulous maxillae, Ghent, Global, Global apical deviation, Global apical deviations, Global coronal, Global coronal deviation, Global deviation, Hand torqued, Health sciences, Higher apical deviation, Implant, Implant carrier, Implant deviations, Implant installation, Implant length, Implant location, Implant placement, Implant position, Implant surgery, Impression material, Insertion, Interimplant, Interimplant distance, Interimplant distances, Intersection point, Lateral deviation, Linear deviations, Longitudinal axis, Major impact, Materialise leuven, Maxilla, Mucosally, Oral implantol, Oral implantology, Oral maxillofac implants, Oral maxillofac surg, Permadyne penta, Planning system, Posterior region, Postoperative, Postoperative scanning data, Preliminary results, Preoperative, Preoperative assessment, Preoperative planning, Present study, Production errors, Production process, Prosthesis, Prosthetic, Prosthetic considerations, Reference plane, Same measurements, Short implants show, Silicone material, Soft tissues, Software, Software package, Software system, Steenberghe, Stereolithographic, Stereolithographic guide, Stereolithographic guides, Surgical, Surgical guide, Surgical guides, Surgical procedure, Surgical template, Tandkliniek belgium, Template, Total accuracy, Treatment protocol, Virtual planning, Vivo position, Xation, Xation screws, Year postoperatively.
- Teeft :
- Abscess formation, Abutment, Accuracy analysis, Angular deviation, Apical, Apical deviation, Apical deviations, Apical interimplant distance, Apical point, Astra, Astra tech, Belgium, Clinical implant dentistry, Clinical trial, Consecutive patients, Coronal, Coronal interimplant distance, Cumulative percentage, Cutoff point, Dental implants, Dental school, Dentomaxillofac radiol, Deviation, Different implant length groups, Edentulous, Edentulous maxilla, Edentulous maxillae, Ghent, Global, Global apical deviation, Global apical deviations, Global coronal, Global coronal deviation, Global deviation, Hand torqued, Health sciences, Higher apical deviation, Implant, Implant carrier, Implant deviations, Implant installation, Implant length, Implant location, Implant placement, Implant position, Implant surgery, Impression material, Insertion, Interimplant, Interimplant distance, Interimplant distances, Intersection point, Lateral deviation, Linear deviations, Longitudinal axis, Major impact, Materialise leuven, Maxilla, Mucosally, Oral implantol, Oral implantology, Oral maxillofac implants, Oral maxillofac surg, Permadyne penta, Planning system, Posterior region, Postoperative, Postoperative scanning data, Preliminary results, Preoperative, Preoperative assessment, Preoperative planning, Present study, Production errors, Production process, Prosthesis, Prosthetic, Prosthetic considerations, Reference plane, Same measurements, Short implants show, Silicone material, Soft tissues, Software, Software package, Software system, Steenberghe, Stereolithographic, Stereolithographic guide, Stereolithographic guides, Surgical, Surgical guide, Surgical guides, Surgical procedure, Surgical template, Tandkliniek belgium, Template, Total accuracy, Treatment protocol, Virtual planning, Vivo position, Xation, Xation screws, Year postoperatively.
Abstract
Background: Flapless implant placement using guided surgery is widespread, although clinical publications on the precision are lacking.
Url:
DOI: 10.1111/j.1708-8208.2009.00255.x
Links to Exploration step
ISTEX:E519927A9A48FAD7B5F796F7E520C82364A990E2Le document en format XML
<record><TEI wicri:istexFullTextTei="biblStruct"><teiHeader><fileDesc><titleStmt><title xml:lang="en">A Prospective Study on the Accuracy of Mucosally Supported Stereolithographic Surgical Guides in Fully Edentulous Maxillae</title><author><name sortKey="D Haese, Jan" sort="D Haese, Jan" uniqKey="D Haese J" first="Jan" last="D'Haese">Jan D'Haese</name><affiliation><mods:affiliation>Department of Periodontology and Oral Implantology, Dental School, Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, University of Ghent, Ghent, Belgium;</mods:affiliation></affiliation><affiliation><mods:affiliation>Tandkliniek Sint‐Lievens‐Houtem, Sint‐Lievens‐Houtem, Belgium;</mods:affiliation></affiliation><affiliation><mods:affiliation>E-mail: jdhaese@base.be</mods:affiliation></affiliation></author><author><name sortKey="Van De Velde, Tommie" sort="Van De Velde, Tommie" uniqKey="Van De Velde T" first="Tommie" last="Van De Velde">Tommie Van De Velde</name><affiliation><mods:affiliation>Department of Periodontology and Oral Implantology, Dental School, Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, University of Ghent, Ghent, Belgium;</mods:affiliation></affiliation></author><author><name sortKey="Elaut, Lucien" sort="Elaut, Lucien" uniqKey="Elaut L" first="Lucien" last="Elaut">Lucien Elaut</name><affiliation><mods:affiliation>Tandkliniek Sint‐Lievens‐Houtem, Sint‐Lievens‐Houtem, Belgium;</mods:affiliation></affiliation></author><author><name sortKey="De Bruyn, Hugo" sort="De Bruyn, Hugo" uniqKey="De Bruyn H" first="Hugo" last="De Bruyn">Hugo De Bruyn</name><affiliation><mods:affiliation>Department of Periodontology and Oral Implantology, Dental School, Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, University of Ghent, Ghent, Belgium</mods:affiliation></affiliation></author></titleStmt><publicationStmt><idno type="wicri:source">ISTEX</idno><idno type="RBID">ISTEX:E519927A9A48FAD7B5F796F7E520C82364A990E2</idno><date when="2012" year="2012">2012</date><idno type="doi">10.1111/j.1708-8208.2009.00255.x</idno><idno type="url">https://api.istex.fr/document/E519927A9A48FAD7B5F796F7E520C82364A990E2/fulltext/pdf</idno><idno type="wicri:Area/Istex/Corpus">007185</idno><idno type="wicri:explorRef" wicri:stream="Istex" wicri:step="Corpus" wicri:corpus="ISTEX">007185</idno></publicationStmt><sourceDesc><biblStruct><analytic><title level="a" type="main">A Prospective Study on the Accuracy of Mucosally Supported Stereolithographic Surgical Guides in Fully Edentulous Maxillae</title><author><name sortKey="D Haese, Jan" sort="D Haese, Jan" uniqKey="D Haese J" first="Jan" last="D'Haese">Jan D'Haese</name><affiliation><mods:affiliation>Department of Periodontology and Oral Implantology, Dental School, Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, University of Ghent, Ghent, Belgium;</mods:affiliation></affiliation><affiliation><mods:affiliation>Tandkliniek Sint‐Lievens‐Houtem, Sint‐Lievens‐Houtem, Belgium;</mods:affiliation></affiliation><affiliation><mods:affiliation>E-mail: jdhaese@base.be</mods:affiliation></affiliation></author><author><name sortKey="Van De Velde, Tommie" sort="Van De Velde, Tommie" uniqKey="Van De Velde T" first="Tommie" last="Van De Velde">Tommie Van De Velde</name><affiliation><mods:affiliation>Department of Periodontology and Oral Implantology, Dental School, Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, University of Ghent, Ghent, Belgium;</mods:affiliation></affiliation></author><author><name sortKey="Elaut, Lucien" sort="Elaut, Lucien" uniqKey="Elaut L" first="Lucien" last="Elaut">Lucien Elaut</name><affiliation><mods:affiliation>Tandkliniek Sint‐Lievens‐Houtem, Sint‐Lievens‐Houtem, Belgium;</mods:affiliation></affiliation></author><author><name sortKey="De Bruyn, Hugo" sort="De Bruyn, Hugo" uniqKey="De Bruyn H" first="Hugo" last="De Bruyn">Hugo De Bruyn</name><affiliation><mods:affiliation>Department of Periodontology and Oral Implantology, Dental School, Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, University of Ghent, Ghent, Belgium</mods:affiliation></affiliation></author></analytic><monogr></monogr><series><title level="j" type="main">Clinical Implant Dentistry and Related Research</title><title level="j" type="alt">CLINICAL IMPLANT DENTISTRY RELATED RESEARCH</title><idno type="ISSN">1523-0899</idno><idno type="eISSN">1708-8208</idno><imprint><biblScope unit="vol">14</biblScope><biblScope unit="issue">2</biblScope><biblScope unit="page" from="293">293</biblScope><biblScope unit="page" to="303">303</biblScope><biblScope unit="page-count">11</biblScope><publisher>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</publisher><pubPlace>Oxford, UK</pubPlace><date type="published" when="2012-04">2012-04</date></imprint><idno type="ISSN">1523-0899</idno></series></biblStruct></sourceDesc><seriesStmt><idno type="ISSN">1523-0899</idno></seriesStmt></fileDesc><profileDesc><textClass><keywords scheme="KwdEn" xml:lang="en"><term>Abscess formation</term><term>Abutment</term><term>Accuracy analysis</term><term>Angular deviation</term><term>Apical</term><term>Apical deviation</term><term>Apical deviations</term><term>Apical interimplant distance</term><term>Apical point</term><term>Astra</term><term>Astra tech</term><term>Belgium</term><term>Clinical implant dentistry</term><term>Clinical trial</term><term>Consecutive patients</term><term>Coronal</term><term>Coronal interimplant distance</term><term>Cumulative percentage</term><term>Cutoff point</term><term>Dental implants</term><term>Dental school</term><term>Dentomaxillofac radiol</term><term>Deviation</term><term>Different implant length groups</term><term>Edentulous</term><term>Edentulous maxilla</term><term>Edentulous maxillae</term><term>Ghent</term><term>Global</term><term>Global apical deviation</term><term>Global apical deviations</term><term>Global coronal</term><term>Global coronal deviation</term><term>Global deviation</term><term>Hand torqued</term><term>Health sciences</term><term>Higher apical deviation</term><term>Implant</term><term>Implant carrier</term><term>Implant deviations</term><term>Implant installation</term><term>Implant length</term><term>Implant location</term><term>Implant placement</term><term>Implant position</term><term>Implant surgery</term><term>Impression material</term><term>Insertion</term><term>Interimplant</term><term>Interimplant distance</term><term>Interimplant distances</term><term>Intersection point</term><term>Lateral deviation</term><term>Linear deviations</term><term>Longitudinal axis</term><term>Major impact</term><term>Materialise leuven</term><term>Maxilla</term><term>Mucosally</term><term>Oral implantol</term><term>Oral implantology</term><term>Oral maxillofac implants</term><term>Oral maxillofac surg</term><term>Permadyne penta</term><term>Planning system</term><term>Posterior region</term><term>Postoperative</term><term>Postoperative scanning data</term><term>Preliminary results</term><term>Preoperative</term><term>Preoperative assessment</term><term>Preoperative planning</term><term>Present study</term><term>Production errors</term><term>Production process</term><term>Prosthesis</term><term>Prosthetic</term><term>Prosthetic considerations</term><term>Reference plane</term><term>Same measurements</term><term>Short implants show</term><term>Silicone material</term><term>Soft tissues</term><term>Software</term><term>Software package</term><term>Software system</term><term>Steenberghe</term><term>Stereolithographic</term><term>Stereolithographic guide</term><term>Stereolithographic guides</term><term>Surgical</term><term>Surgical guide</term><term>Surgical guides</term><term>Surgical procedure</term><term>Surgical template</term><term>Tandkliniek belgium</term><term>Template</term><term>Total accuracy</term><term>Treatment protocol</term><term>Virtual planning</term><term>Vivo position</term><term>Xation</term><term>Xation screws</term><term>Year postoperatively</term></keywords><keywords scheme="Teeft" xml:lang="en"><term>Abscess formation</term><term>Abutment</term><term>Accuracy analysis</term><term>Angular deviation</term><term>Apical</term><term>Apical deviation</term><term>Apical deviations</term><term>Apical interimplant distance</term><term>Apical point</term><term>Astra</term><term>Astra tech</term><term>Belgium</term><term>Clinical implant dentistry</term><term>Clinical trial</term><term>Consecutive patients</term><term>Coronal</term><term>Coronal interimplant distance</term><term>Cumulative percentage</term><term>Cutoff point</term><term>Dental implants</term><term>Dental school</term><term>Dentomaxillofac radiol</term><term>Deviation</term><term>Different implant length groups</term><term>Edentulous</term><term>Edentulous maxilla</term><term>Edentulous maxillae</term><term>Ghent</term><term>Global</term><term>Global apical deviation</term><term>Global apical deviations</term><term>Global coronal</term><term>Global coronal deviation</term><term>Global deviation</term><term>Hand torqued</term><term>Health sciences</term><term>Higher apical deviation</term><term>Implant</term><term>Implant carrier</term><term>Implant deviations</term><term>Implant installation</term><term>Implant length</term><term>Implant location</term><term>Implant placement</term><term>Implant position</term><term>Implant surgery</term><term>Impression material</term><term>Insertion</term><term>Interimplant</term><term>Interimplant distance</term><term>Interimplant distances</term><term>Intersection point</term><term>Lateral deviation</term><term>Linear deviations</term><term>Longitudinal axis</term><term>Major impact</term><term>Materialise leuven</term><term>Maxilla</term><term>Mucosally</term><term>Oral implantol</term><term>Oral implantology</term><term>Oral maxillofac implants</term><term>Oral maxillofac surg</term><term>Permadyne penta</term><term>Planning system</term><term>Posterior region</term><term>Postoperative</term><term>Postoperative scanning data</term><term>Preliminary results</term><term>Preoperative</term><term>Preoperative assessment</term><term>Preoperative planning</term><term>Present study</term><term>Production errors</term><term>Production process</term><term>Prosthesis</term><term>Prosthetic</term><term>Prosthetic considerations</term><term>Reference plane</term><term>Same measurements</term><term>Short implants show</term><term>Silicone material</term><term>Soft tissues</term><term>Software</term><term>Software package</term><term>Software system</term><term>Steenberghe</term><term>Stereolithographic</term><term>Stereolithographic guide</term><term>Stereolithographic guides</term><term>Surgical</term><term>Surgical guide</term><term>Surgical guides</term><term>Surgical procedure</term><term>Surgical template</term><term>Tandkliniek belgium</term><term>Template</term><term>Total accuracy</term><term>Treatment protocol</term><term>Virtual planning</term><term>Vivo position</term><term>Xation</term><term>Xation screws</term><term>Year postoperatively</term></keywords></textClass></profileDesc></teiHeader><front><div type="abstract">Background: Flapless implant placement using guided surgery is widespread, although clinical publications on the precision are lacking.</div></front></TEI><istex><corpusName>wiley</corpusName><keywords><teeft><json:string>implant</json:string><json:string>apical</json:string><json:string>stereolithographic</json:string><json:string>coronal</json:string><json:string>interimplant</json:string><json:string>maxilla</json:string><json:string>surgical</json:string><json:string>xation</json:string><json:string>software</json:string><json:string>abutment</json:string><json:string>prosthesis</json:string><json:string>preoperative</json:string><json:string>prosthetic</json:string><json:string>astra tech</json:string><json:string>mucosally</json:string><json:string>steenberghe</json:string><json:string>postoperative</json:string><json:string>global apical deviation</json:string><json:string>xation screws</json:string><json:string>surgical guide</json:string><json:string>apical deviations</json:string><json:string>implant placement</json:string><json:string>angular deviation</json:string><json:string>interimplant distances</json:string><json:string>surgical template</json:string><json:string>clinical implant dentistry</json:string><json:string>edentulous</json:string><json:string>astra</json:string><json:string>insertion</json:string><json:string>stereolithographic guide</json:string><json:string>dental implants</json:string><json:string>preoperative planning</json:string><json:string>global coronal</json:string><json:string>implant surgery</json:string><json:string>virtual planning</json:string><json:string>implant installation</json:string><json:string>edentulous maxillae</json:string><json:string>ghent</json:string><json:string>surgical guides</json:string><json:string>dental school</json:string><json:string>consecutive patients</json:string><json:string>oral implantology</json:string><json:string>oral maxillofac implants</json:string><json:string>soft tissues</json:string><json:string>higher apical deviation</json:string><json:string>cutoff point</json:string><json:string>total accuracy</json:string><json:string>implant deviations</json:string><json:string>lateral deviation</json:string><json:string>health sciences</json:string><json:string>longitudinal axis</json:string><json:string>reference plane</json:string><json:string>apical deviation</json:string><json:string>implant length</json:string><json:string>surgical procedure</json:string><json:string>present study</json:string><json:string>posterior region</json:string><json:string>deviation</json:string><json:string>belgium</json:string><json:string>global</json:string><json:string>implant location</json:string><json:string>apical interimplant distance</json:string><json:string>materialise leuven</json:string><json:string>linear deviations</json:string><json:string>tandkliniek belgium</json:string><json:string>short implants show</json:string><json:string>hand torqued</json:string><json:string>software package</json:string><json:string>stereolithographic guides</json:string><json:string>year postoperatively</json:string><json:string>accuracy analysis</json:string><json:string>edentulous maxilla</json:string><json:string>apical point</json:string><json:string>global deviation</json:string><json:string>vivo position</json:string><json:string>software system</json:string><json:string>intersection point</json:string><json:string>postoperative scanning data</json:string><json:string>coronal interimplant distance</json:string><json:string>same measurements</json:string><json:string>impression material</json:string><json:string>abscess formation</json:string><json:string>treatment protocol</json:string><json:string>global coronal deviation</json:string><json:string>different implant length groups</json:string><json:string>clinical trial</json:string><json:string>prosthetic considerations</json:string><json:string>cumulative percentage</json:string><json:string>production process</json:string><json:string>silicone material</json:string><json:string>permadyne penta</json:string><json:string>global apical deviations</json:string><json:string>implant position</json:string><json:string>interimplant distance</json:string><json:string>production errors</json:string><json:string>implant carrier</json:string><json:string>major impact</json:string><json:string>dentomaxillofac radiol</json:string><json:string>preoperative assessment</json:string><json:string>planning system</json:string><json:string>oral implantol</json:string><json:string>preliminary results</json:string><json:string>oral maxillofac surg</json:string><json:string>template</json:string></teeft></keywords><author><json:item><name>Jan D'haese DDS, MSc</name><affiliations><json:string>Department of Periodontology and Oral Implantology, Dental School, Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, University of Ghent, Ghent, Belgium;</json:string><json:string>Tandkliniek Sint‐Lievens‐Houtem, Sint‐Lievens‐Houtem, Belgium;</json:string><json:string>E-mail: jdhaese@base.be</json:string></affiliations></json:item><json:item><name>Tommie Van De Velde DDS, MSc, PhD</name><affiliations><json:string>Department of Periodontology and Oral Implantology, Dental School, Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, University of Ghent, Ghent, Belgium;</json:string></affiliations></json:item><json:item><name>Lucien Elaut DDS</name><affiliations><json:string>Tandkliniek Sint‐Lievens‐Houtem, Sint‐Lievens‐Houtem, Belgium;</json:string></affiliations></json:item><json:item><name>Hugo De Bruyn DDS, MSc, PhD</name><affiliations><json:string>Department of Periodontology and Oral Implantology, Dental School, Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, University of Ghent, Ghent, Belgium</json:string></affiliations></json:item></author><subject><json:item><lang><json:string>eng</json:string></lang><value>accuracy</value></json:item><json:item><lang><json:string>eng</json:string></lang><value>dental implants</value></json:item><json:item><lang><json:string>eng</json:string></lang><value>edentulous maxilla</value></json:item><json:item><lang><json:string>eng</json:string></lang><value>guided surgery</value></json:item><json:item><lang><json:string>eng</json:string></lang><value>stereolithography</value></json:item><json:item><lang><json:string>eng</json:string></lang><value>surgical template</value></json:item></subject><articleId><json:string>CID255</json:string></articleId><arkIstex>ark:/67375/WNG-JGJRT13X-S</arkIstex><language><json:string>eng</json:string></language><originalGenre><json:string>article</json:string></originalGenre><abstract>Background: Flapless implant placement using guided surgery is widespread, although clinical publications on the precision are lacking.</abstract><qualityIndicators><score>6.838</score><pdfWordCount>4634</pdfWordCount><pdfCharCount>30196</pdfCharCount><pdfVersion>1.3</pdfVersion><pdfPageCount>11</pdfPageCount><pdfPageSize>585 x 783 pts</pdfPageSize><refBibsNative>true</refBibsNative><abstractWordCount>17</abstractWordCount><abstractCharCount>135</abstractCharCount><keywordCount>6</keywordCount></qualityIndicators><title>A Prospective Study on the Accuracy of Mucosally Supported Stereolithographic Surgical Guides in Fully Edentulous Maxillae</title><pmid><json:string>19906267</json:string></pmid><genre><json:string>article</json:string></genre><host><title>Clinical Implant Dentistry and Related Research</title><language><json:string>unknown</json:string></language><doi><json:string>10.1111/(ISSN)1708-8208</json:string></doi><issn><json:string>1523-0899</json:string></issn><eissn><json:string>1708-8208</json:string></eissn><publisherId><json:string>CID</json:string></publisherId><volume>14</volume><issue>2</issue><pages><first>293</first><last>303</last><total>11</total></pages><genre><json:string>journal</json:string></genre></host><namedEntities><unitex><date><json:string>2012</json:string><json:string>2007</json:string></date><geogName></geogName><orgName><json:string>SPSS Inc., Chicago</json:string><json:string>Related Research, Volume</json:string></orgName><orgName_funder></orgName_funder><orgName_provider></orgName_provider><persName><json:string>J.Morita</json:string><json:string>Selection</json:string><json:string>Hugo De Bruyn</json:string><json:string>Lucien Elaut</json:string><json:string>Graphic</json:string><json:string>Committees</json:string></persName><placeName><json:string>Kyoto</json:string><json:string>Germany</json:string><json:string>Haarlem</json:string><json:string>Erlangen</json:string><json:string>Norristown</json:string><json:string>USA</json:string><json:string>Japan</json:string><json:string>Leuven</json:string><json:string>Sweden</json:string><json:string>Belgium</json:string><json:string>Netherlands</json:string><json:string>PA</json:string></placeName><ref_url></ref_url><ref_bibl></ref_bibl><bibl></bibl></unitex></namedEntities><ark><json:string>ark:/67375/WNG-JGJRT13X-S</json:string></ark><categories><wos><json:string>1 - science</json:string><json:string>2 - dentistry, oral surgery & medicine</json:string></wos><scienceMetrix><json:string>1 - health sciences</json:string><json:string>2 - clinical medicine</json:string><json:string>3 - dentistry</json:string></scienceMetrix><scopus><json:string>1 - Health Sciences</json:string><json:string>2 - Dentistry</json:string><json:string>3 - General Dentistry</json:string><json:string>1 - Health Sciences</json:string><json:string>2 - Dentistry</json:string><json:string>3 - Oral Surgery</json:string></scopus></categories><publicationDate>2012</publicationDate><copyrightDate>2012</copyrightDate><doi><json:string>10.1111/j.1708-8208.2009.00255.x</json:string></doi><id>E519927A9A48FAD7B5F796F7E520C82364A990E2</id><score>1</score><fulltext><json:item><extension>pdf</extension><original>true</original><mimetype>application/pdf</mimetype><uri>https://api.istex.fr/document/E519927A9A48FAD7B5F796F7E520C82364A990E2/fulltext/pdf</uri></json:item><json:item><extension>zip</extension><original>false</original><mimetype>application/zip</mimetype><uri>https://api.istex.fr/document/E519927A9A48FAD7B5F796F7E520C82364A990E2/fulltext/zip</uri></json:item><istex:fulltextTEI uri="https://api.istex.fr/document/E519927A9A48FAD7B5F796F7E520C82364A990E2/fulltext/tei"><teiHeader><fileDesc><titleStmt><title level="a" type="main">A Prospective Study on the Accuracy of Mucosally Supported Stereolithographic Surgical Guides in Fully Edentulous Maxillae</title></titleStmt><publicationStmt><authority>ISTEX</authority><publisher>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</publisher><pubPlace>Oxford, UK</pubPlace><availability><licence>© 2009 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.</licence></availability><date type="published" when="2012-04"></date></publicationStmt><notesStmt><note type="content-type" subtype="article" source="article" scheme="https://content-type.data.istex.fr/ark:/67375/XTP-6N5SZHKN-D">article</note><note type="publication-type" subtype="journal" scheme="https://publication-type.data.istex.fr/ark:/67375/JMC-0GLKJH51-B">journal</note></notesStmt><sourceDesc><biblStruct type="article"><analytic><title level="a" type="main">A Prospective Study on the Accuracy of Mucosally Supported Stereolithographic Surgical Guides in Fully Edentulous Maxillae</title><title level="a" type="short">Mucosally Supported Stereolithographic Surgical Guides</title><author xml:id="author-0000" role="corresp"><persName><forename type="first">Jan</forename><surname>D'haese</surname><roleName type="degree">DDS, MSc</roleName></persName><affiliation>Department of Periodontology and Oral Implantology, Dental School, Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, University of Ghent, Ghent, Belgium;<address><country key="BE"></country></address></affiliation><affiliation>Tandkliniek Sint‐Lievens‐Houtem, Sint‐Lievens‐Houtem, Belgium;<address><country key="BE"></country></address></affiliation><affiliation>Mr. Jan D'haese, Tandkliniek Sint‐Lievens‐Houtem, Schoolstraat 2b, 9520 Sint‐Lievens‐Houtem, Belgium; e‐mail: jdhaese@base.be</affiliation></author><author xml:id="author-0001"><persName><forename type="first">Tommie</forename><surname>Van De Velde</surname><roleName type="degree">DDS, MSc, PhD</roleName></persName><affiliation>Department of Periodontology and Oral Implantology, Dental School, Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, University of Ghent, Ghent, Belgium;<address><country key="BE"></country></address></affiliation></author><author xml:id="author-0002"><persName><forename type="first">Lucien</forename><surname>Elaut</surname><roleName type="degree">DDS</roleName></persName><affiliation>Tandkliniek Sint‐Lievens‐Houtem, Sint‐Lievens‐Houtem, Belgium;<address><country key="BE"></country></address></affiliation></author><author xml:id="author-0003"><persName><forename type="first">Hugo</forename><surname>De Bruyn</surname><roleName type="degree">DDS, MSc, PhD</roleName></persName><affiliation>Department of Periodontology and Oral Implantology, Dental School, Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, University of Ghent, Ghent, Belgium<address><country key="BE"></country></address></affiliation></author><idno type="istex">E519927A9A48FAD7B5F796F7E520C82364A990E2</idno><idno type="ark">ark:/67375/WNG-JGJRT13X-S</idno><idno type="DOI">10.1111/j.1708-8208.2009.00255.x</idno><idno type="unit">CID255</idno><idno type="toTypesetVersion">file:CID.CID255.pdf</idno></analytic><monogr><title level="j" type="main">Clinical Implant Dentistry and Related Research</title><title level="j" type="alt">CLINICAL IMPLANT DENTISTRY RELATED RESEARCH</title><idno type="pISSN">1523-0899</idno><idno type="eISSN">1708-8208</idno><idno type="book-DOI">10.1111/(ISSN)1708-8208</idno><idno type="book-part-DOI">10.1111/cid.2012.14.issue-2</idno><idno type="product">CID</idno><idno type="publisherDivision">ST</idno><imprint><biblScope unit="vol">14</biblScope><biblScope unit="issue">2</biblScope><biblScope unit="page" from="293">293</biblScope><biblScope unit="page" to="303">303</biblScope><biblScope unit="page-count">11</biblScope><publisher>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</publisher><pubPlace>Oxford, UK</pubPlace><date type="published" when="2012-04"></date></imprint></monogr></biblStruct></sourceDesc></fileDesc><profileDesc><abstract xml:lang="en" style="main"><head>ABSTRACT</head><p><hi rend="bold">Background:</hi> Flapless implant placement using guided surgery is widespread, although clinical publications on the precision are lacking.</p><p><hi rend="bold">Purpose:</hi> The purpose of this study was to evaluate the accuracy of mucosal‐supported stereolithographic guides in the edentulous maxillae.</p><p><hi rend="bold">Materials and Methods:</hi> Seventy‐eight OsseoSpeed™ implants (Astra Tech AB, Mölndal, Sweden) of 3.5 to 5 mm width and 8 to 15 mm length were installed consecutively in 13 patients. Implants were functionally loaded on the day of surgery, and implant location was assessed with a computed tomography scan. Mimics 9.0 software (Materialise N.V., Leuven, Belgium) was used to fuse the images of the virtually planned and actually placed implants, and the locations, axes, and interimplant distances were compared.</p><p><hi rend="bold">Results:</hi> One implant was lost shortly after insertion because of abscess formation caused by remnants of impression material. Seventy‐seven implant locations were analyzed. The deviation at the entrance point ranged between 0.29 mm and 2.45 mm (SD: 0.44 mm), with a mean of 0.91 mm. Average angle deviation was 2.60° (range 0.16–8.86°; SD: 1.61°). At the apical point, the deviation ranged between 0.32 mm and 3.01 mm, with a mean of 1.13 mm (SD: 0.52 mm). The mean deviation of the coronal and apical interimplant distance was respectively 0.18 mm (range 0.07–0.32 mm; SD: 0.15) and 0.33 mm (range 0.12–0.69 mm; SD: 0.28). These deviations are lower than the global coronal and apical deviations.</p><p><hi rend="bold">Conclusion:</hi> The present study is the first to investigate the accuracy of stereolithographic, full, mucosally supported surgical guides in the treatment of fully edentulous maxillae. Clinicians should be warned that angular and linear deviations are to be expected. Short implants show significantly lower apical deviations compared with longer ones. Reasons for implant deviations are multifactorial; however, it is unlikely that the production process of the guide has a major impact on the total accuracy of a mucosal‐supported stereolithographic guide.</p></abstract><textClass><keywords xml:lang="en"><term xml:id="k1">accuracy</term><term xml:id="k2">dental implants</term><term xml:id="k3">edentulous maxilla</term><term xml:id="k4">guided surgery</term><term xml:id="k5">stereolithography</term><term xml:id="k6">surgical template</term></keywords><keywords rend="tocHeading1"><term>ARTICLES</term></keywords></textClass><langUsage><language ident="en"></language></langUsage></profileDesc></teiHeader></istex:fulltextTEI><json:item><extension>txt</extension><original>false</original><mimetype>text/plain</mimetype><uri>https://api.istex.fr/document/E519927A9A48FAD7B5F796F7E520C82364A990E2/fulltext/txt</uri></json:item></fulltext><metadata><istex:metadataXml wicri:clean="Wiley, elements deleted: body"><istex:xmlDeclaration>version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" standalone="yes"</istex:xmlDeclaration><istex:document><component version="2.0" type="serialArticle" xml:lang="en"><header><publicationMeta level="product"><publisherInfo><publisherName>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</publisherName><publisherLoc>Oxford, UK</publisherLoc></publisherInfo><doi origin="wiley" registered="yes">10.1111/(ISSN)1708-8208</doi><issn type="print">1523-0899</issn><issn type="electronic">1708-8208</issn><idGroup><id type="product" value="CID"></id><id type="publisherDivision" value="ST"></id></idGroup><titleGroup><title type="main" sort="CLINICAL IMPLANT DENTISTRY RELATED RESEARCH">Clinical Implant Dentistry and Related Research</title></titleGroup></publicationMeta><publicationMeta level="part" position="04102"><doi origin="wiley">10.1111/cid.2012.14.issue-2</doi><numberingGroup><numbering type="journalVolume" number="14">14</numbering><numbering type="journalIssue" number="2">2</numbering></numberingGroup><coverDate startDate="2012-04">April 2012</coverDate></publicationMeta><publicationMeta level="unit" type="article" position="15" status="forIssue"><doi origin="wiley">10.1111/j.1708-8208.2009.00255.x</doi><idGroup><id type="unit" value="CID255"></id></idGroup><countGroup><count type="pageTotal" number="11"></count></countGroup><titleGroup><title type="tocHeading1">ARTICLES</title></titleGroup><copyright>© 2009 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.</copyright><eventGroup><event type="firstOnline" date="2009-11-10"></event><event type="publishedOnlineAcceptedOrEarlyUnpaginated" date="2009-11-10"></event><event type="xmlConverted" agent="Converter:BPG_TO_WML3G version:3.1.3 standalone mode:FullText" date="2012-03-22"></event><event type="publishedOnlineFinalForm" date="2012-03-22"></event><event type="xmlConverted" agent="Converter:WILEY_ML3G_TO_WILEY_ML3GV2 version:3.8.8" date="2014-01-15"></event><event type="xmlConverted" agent="Converter:WML3G_To_WML3G version:4.3.4 mode:FullText" date="2015-02-25"></event></eventGroup><numberingGroup><numbering type="pageFirst" number="293">293</numbering><numbering type="pageLast" number="303">303</numbering></numberingGroup><correspondenceTo>Mr. Jan D'haese, Tandkliniek Sint‐Lievens‐Houtem, Schoolstraat 2b, 9520 Sint‐Lievens‐Houtem, Belgium; e‐mail: <email>jdhaese@base.be</email></correspondenceTo><linkGroup><link type="toTypesetVersion" href="file:CID.CID255.pdf"></link></linkGroup></publicationMeta><contentMeta><countGroup><count type="figureTotal" number="8"></count><count type="tableTotal" number="3"></count><count type="formulaTotal" number="0"></count><count type="referenceTotal" number="25"></count><count type="wordTotal" number="5223"></count><count type="linksPubMed" number="0"></count><count type="linksCrossRef" number="0"></count></countGroup><titleGroup><title type="main">A Prospective Study on the Accuracy of Mucosally Supported Stereolithographic Surgical Guides in Fully Edentulous Maxillae</title><title type="shortAuthors">Clinical Implant Dentistry and Related Research, Volume *, Number *, 2009</title><title type="short">Mucosally Supported Stereolithographic Surgical Guides</title></titleGroup><creators><creator creatorRole="author" xml:id="cr1" affiliationRef="#a1 #a2" corresponding="yes"><personName><givenNames>Jan</givenNames><familyName>D'haese</familyName><degrees>DDS, MSc</degrees></personName></creator><creator creatorRole="author" xml:id="cr2" affiliationRef="#a3"><personName><givenNames>Tommie</givenNames><familyName>Van De Velde</familyName><degrees>DDS, MSc, PhD</degrees></personName></creator><creator creatorRole="author" xml:id="cr3" affiliationRef="#a4"><personName><givenNames>Lucien</givenNames><familyName>Elaut</familyName><degrees>DDS</degrees></personName></creator><creator creatorRole="author" xml:id="cr4" affiliationRef="#a5"><personName><givenNames>Hugo</givenNames><familyName>De Bruyn</familyName><degrees>DDS, MSc, PhD</degrees></personName></creator></creators><affiliationGroup><affiliation xml:id="a1" countryCode="BE"><unparsedAffiliation>Department of Periodontology and Oral Implantology, Dental School, Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, University of Ghent, Ghent, Belgium;</unparsedAffiliation></affiliation><affiliation xml:id="a2" countryCode="BE"><unparsedAffiliation>Tandkliniek Sint‐Lievens‐Houtem, Sint‐Lievens‐Houtem, Belgium;</unparsedAffiliation></affiliation><affiliation xml:id="a3" countryCode="BE"><unparsedAffiliation>Department of Periodontology and Oral Implantology, Dental School, Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, University of Ghent, Ghent, Belgium;</unparsedAffiliation></affiliation><affiliation xml:id="a4" countryCode="BE"><unparsedAffiliation>Tandkliniek Sint‐Lievens‐Houtem, Sint‐Lievens‐Houtem, Belgium;</unparsedAffiliation></affiliation><affiliation xml:id="a5" countryCode="BE"><unparsedAffiliation>Department of Periodontology and Oral Implantology, Dental School, Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, University of Ghent, Ghent, Belgium</unparsedAffiliation></affiliation></affiliationGroup><keywordGroup xml:lang="en"><keyword xml:id="k1">accuracy</keyword><keyword xml:id="k2">dental implants</keyword><keyword xml:id="k3">edentulous maxilla</keyword><keyword xml:id="k4">guided surgery</keyword><keyword xml:id="k5">stereolithography</keyword><keyword xml:id="k6">surgical template</keyword></keywordGroup><abstractGroup><abstract type="main" xml:lang="en"><title type="main">ABSTRACT</title><p><b>Background:</b> Flapless implant placement using guided surgery is widespread, although clinical publications on the precision are lacking.</p><p><b>Purpose:</b> The purpose of this study was to evaluate the accuracy of mucosal‐supported stereolithographic guides in the edentulous maxillae.</p><p><b>Materials and Methods:</b> Seventy‐eight OsseoSpeed™ implants (Astra Tech AB, Mölndal, Sweden) of 3.5 to 5 mm width and 8 to 15 mm length were installed consecutively in 13 patients. Implants were functionally loaded on the day of surgery, and implant location was assessed with a computed tomography scan. Mimics 9.0 software (Materialise N.V., Leuven, Belgium) was used to fuse the images of the virtually planned and actually placed implants, and the locations, axes, and interimplant distances were compared.</p><p><b>Results:</b> One implant was lost shortly after insertion because of abscess formation caused by remnants of impression material. Seventy‐seven implant locations were analyzed. The deviation at the entrance point ranged between 0.29 mm and 2.45 mm (SD: 0.44 mm), with a mean of 0.91 mm. Average angle deviation was 2.60° (range 0.16–8.86°; SD: 1.61°). At the apical point, the deviation ranged between 0.32 mm and 3.01 mm, with a mean of 1.13 mm (SD: 0.52 mm). The mean deviation of the coronal and apical interimplant distance was respectively 0.18 mm (range 0.07–0.32 mm; SD: 0.15) and 0.33 mm (range 0.12–0.69 mm; SD: 0.28). These deviations are lower than the global coronal and apical deviations.</p><p><b>Conclusion:</b> The present study is the first to investigate the accuracy of stereolithographic, full, mucosally supported surgical guides in the treatment of fully edentulous maxillae. Clinicians should be warned that angular and linear deviations are to be expected. Short implants show significantly lower apical deviations compared with longer ones. Reasons for implant deviations are multifactorial; however, it is unlikely that the production process of the guide has a major impact on the total accuracy of a mucosal‐supported stereolithographic guide.</p></abstract></abstractGroup></contentMeta></header></component></istex:document></istex:metadataXml><mods version="3.6"><titleInfo lang="en"><title>A Prospective Study on the Accuracy of Mucosally Supported Stereolithographic Surgical Guides in Fully Edentulous Maxillae</title></titleInfo><titleInfo type="abbreviated" lang="en"><title>Mucosally Supported Stereolithographic Surgical Guides</title></titleInfo><titleInfo type="alternative" contentType="CDATA" lang="en"><title>A Prospective Study on the Accuracy of Mucosally Supported Stereolithographic Surgical Guides in Fully Edentulous Maxillae</title></titleInfo><name type="personal"><namePart type="given">Jan</namePart><namePart type="family">D'haese</namePart><namePart type="termsOfAddress">DDS, MSc</namePart><affiliation>Department of Periodontology and Oral Implantology, Dental School, Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, University of Ghent, Ghent, Belgium;</affiliation><affiliation>Tandkliniek Sint‐Lievens‐Houtem, Sint‐Lievens‐Houtem, Belgium;</affiliation><affiliation>E-mail: jdhaese@base.be</affiliation><role><roleTerm type="text">author</roleTerm></role></name><name type="personal"><namePart type="given">Tommie</namePart><namePart type="family">Van De Velde</namePart><namePart type="termsOfAddress">DDS, MSc, PhD</namePart><affiliation>Department of Periodontology and Oral Implantology, Dental School, Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, University of Ghent, Ghent, Belgium;</affiliation><role><roleTerm type="text">author</roleTerm></role></name><name type="personal"><namePart type="given">Lucien</namePart><namePart type="family">Elaut</namePart><namePart type="termsOfAddress">DDS</namePart><affiliation>Tandkliniek Sint‐Lievens‐Houtem, Sint‐Lievens‐Houtem, Belgium;</affiliation><role><roleTerm type="text">author</roleTerm></role></name><name type="personal"><namePart type="given">Hugo</namePart><namePart type="family">De Bruyn</namePart><namePart type="termsOfAddress">DDS, MSc, PhD</namePart><affiliation>Department of Periodontology and Oral Implantology, Dental School, Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, University of Ghent, Ghent, Belgium</affiliation><role><roleTerm type="text">author</roleTerm></role></name><typeOfResource>text</typeOfResource><genre type="article" displayLabel="article" authority="ISTEX" authorityURI="https://content-type.data.istex.fr" valueURI="https://content-type.data.istex.fr/ark:/67375/XTP-6N5SZHKN-D">article</genre><originInfo><publisher>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</publisher><place><placeTerm type="text">Oxford, UK</placeTerm></place><dateIssued encoding="w3cdtf">2012-04</dateIssued><copyrightDate encoding="w3cdtf">2012</copyrightDate></originInfo><language><languageTerm type="code" authority="rfc3066">en</languageTerm><languageTerm type="code" authority="iso639-2b">eng</languageTerm></language><physicalDescription><extent unit="figures">8</extent><extent unit="tables">3</extent><extent unit="formulas">0</extent><extent unit="references">25</extent><extent unit="linksCrossRef">0</extent><extent unit="words">5223</extent></physicalDescription><abstract>Background: Flapless implant placement using guided surgery is widespread, although clinical publications on the precision are lacking.</abstract><abstract>Purpose: The purpose of this study was to evaluate the accuracy of mucosal‐supported stereolithographic guides in the edentulous maxillae.</abstract><abstract>Materials and Methods: Seventy‐eight OsseoSpeed™ implants (Astra Tech AB, Mölndal, Sweden) of 3.5 to 5 mm width and 8 to 15 mm length were installed consecutively in 13 patients. Implants were functionally loaded on the day of surgery, and implant location was assessed with a computed tomography scan. Mimics 9.0 software (Materialise N.V., Leuven, Belgium) was used to fuse the images of the virtually planned and actually placed implants, and the locations, axes, and interimplant distances were compared.</abstract><abstract>Results: One implant was lost shortly after insertion because of abscess formation caused by remnants of impression material. Seventy‐seven implant locations were analyzed. The deviation at the entrance point ranged between 0.29 mm and 2.45 mm (SD: 0.44 mm), with a mean of 0.91 mm. Average angle deviation was 2.60° (range 0.16–8.86°; SD: 1.61°). At the apical point, the deviation ranged between 0.32 mm and 3.01 mm, with a mean of 1.13 mm (SD: 0.52 mm). The mean deviation of the coronal and apical interimplant distance was respectively 0.18 mm (range 0.07–0.32 mm; SD: 0.15) and 0.33 mm (range 0.12–0.69 mm; SD: 0.28). These deviations are lower than the global coronal and apical deviations.</abstract><abstract>Conclusion: The present study is the first to investigate the accuracy of stereolithographic, full, mucosally supported surgical guides in the treatment of fully edentulous maxillae. Clinicians should be warned that angular and linear deviations are to be expected. Short implants show significantly lower apical deviations compared with longer ones. Reasons for implant deviations are multifactorial; however, it is unlikely that the production process of the guide has a major impact on the total accuracy of a mucosal‐supported stereolithographic guide.</abstract><subject lang="en"><genre>keywords</genre><topic>accuracy</topic><topic>dental implants</topic><topic>edentulous maxilla</topic><topic>guided surgery</topic><topic>stereolithography</topic><topic>surgical template</topic></subject><relatedItem type="host"><titleInfo><title>Clinical Implant Dentistry and Related Research</title></titleInfo><genre type="journal" authority="ISTEX" authorityURI="https://publication-type.data.istex.fr" valueURI="https://publication-type.data.istex.fr/ark:/67375/JMC-0GLKJH51-B">journal</genre><identifier type="ISSN">1523-0899</identifier><identifier type="eISSN">1708-8208</identifier><identifier type="DOI">10.1111/(ISSN)1708-8208</identifier><identifier type="PublisherID">CID</identifier><part><date>2012</date><detail type="volume"><caption>vol.</caption><number>14</number></detail><detail type="issue"><caption>no.</caption><number>2</number></detail><extent unit="pages"><start>293</start><end>303</end><total>11</total></extent></part></relatedItem><identifier type="istex">E519927A9A48FAD7B5F796F7E520C82364A990E2</identifier><identifier type="ark">ark:/67375/WNG-JGJRT13X-S</identifier><identifier type="DOI">10.1111/j.1708-8208.2009.00255.x</identifier><identifier type="ArticleID">CID255</identifier><accessCondition type="use and reproduction" contentType="copyright">© 2009 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.</accessCondition><recordInfo><recordContentSource authority="ISTEX" authorityURI="https://loaded-corpus.data.istex.fr" valueURI="https://loaded-corpus.data.istex.fr/ark:/67375/XBH-L0C46X92-X">wiley</recordContentSource><recordOrigin>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</recordOrigin></recordInfo></mods><json:item><extension>json</extension><original>false</original><mimetype>application/json</mimetype><uri>https://api.istex.fr/document/E519927A9A48FAD7B5F796F7E520C82364A990E2/metadata/json</uri></json:item></metadata><serie></serie></istex></record>Pour manipuler ce document sous Unix (Dilib)
EXPLOR_STEP=$WICRI_ROOT/Wicri/Santé/explor/EdenteV2/Data/Istex/Corpus
HfdSelect -h $EXPLOR_STEP/biblio.hfd -nk 007185 | SxmlIndent | more
Ou
HfdSelect -h $EXPLOR_AREA/Data/Istex/Corpus/biblio.hfd -nk 007185 | SxmlIndent | more
Pour mettre un lien sur cette page dans le réseau Wicri
{{Explor lien
|wiki= Wicri/Santé
|area= EdenteV2
|flux= Istex
|étape= Corpus
|type= RBID
|clé= ISTEX:E519927A9A48FAD7B5F796F7E520C82364A990E2
|texte= A Prospective Study on the Accuracy of Mucosally Supported Stereolithographic Surgical Guides in Fully Edentulous Maxillae
}}
| This area was generated with Dilib version V0.6.32. |  |