Oral health in nursing home residents with different cognitive statuses
Identifieur interne : 007151 ( Istex/Corpus ); précédent : 007150; suivant : 007152Oral health in nursing home residents with different cognitive statuses
Auteurs : Xi Chen ; Jennifer J. J. Clark ; Supawadee NaorungrojSource :
- Gerodontology [ 0734-0664 ] ; 2013-03.
English descriptors
- KwdEn :
- Anova, Anticholinergic, Anticholinergic burden, Anticholinergic drug scale, Aust dent, Behaviour symptoms, Caries, Categorical variables, Chapel hill, Cognitive, Cognitive assessment, Cognitive function, Cognitive impairment, Cognitive status, Continuous variables, Current medications, Demented, Demented group, Demented groups, Demented participants, Dementia, Dental care, Dental caries, Dental professionals, Dental providers, Dental records, Dentate, Dentate participants, Dentition status, Denture, Executive dysfunction, Executive function, Functional assessments, Functional impairment, Functional loss, Functional status, Functional statuses, Geriatr psychiatry, Gerodontology, Gerodontology society, Heavy plaque, Hygiene, Impairment, Internal validation, John wiley sons gerodontology, Lled, Lled teeth, Medical conditions, Medical history, Medication, National nursing home survey, Natural teeth, Nursing home residents, Nursing homes, Older adults, Oral assessment, Oral care, Oral health, Oral health status, Oral hygiene, Oral hygiene care, Oral status, Other factors, Pairwise, Pairwise comparisons, Participant, Periodontal disease, Physical mobility, Present study, Provider, Resident, Severe gingival, Spec care dentist, Study clinic, Study participants, Subjective approaches, Subjective judgements, Systematic review, Systemic health, Tooth loss, Vulnerable population.
- Teeft :
- Anova, Anticholinergic, Anticholinergic burden, Anticholinergic drug scale, Aust dent, Behaviour symptoms, Caries, Categorical variables, Chapel hill, Cognitive, Cognitive assessment, Cognitive function, Cognitive impairment, Cognitive status, Continuous variables, Current medications, Demented, Demented group, Demented groups, Demented participants, Dementia, Dental care, Dental caries, Dental professionals, Dental providers, Dental records, Dentate, Dentate participants, Dentition status, Denture, Executive dysfunction, Executive function, Functional assessments, Functional impairment, Functional loss, Functional status, Functional statuses, Geriatr psychiatry, Gerodontology, Gerodontology society, Heavy plaque, Hygiene, Impairment, Internal validation, John wiley sons gerodontology, Lled, Lled teeth, Medical conditions, Medical history, Medication, National nursing home survey, Natural teeth, Nursing home residents, Nursing homes, Older adults, Oral assessment, Oral care, Oral health, Oral health status, Oral hygiene, Oral hygiene care, Oral status, Other factors, Pairwise, Pairwise comparisons, Participant, Periodontal disease, Physical mobility, Present study, Provider, Resident, Severe gingival, Spec care dentist, Study clinic, Study participants, Subjective approaches, Subjective judgements, Systematic review, Systemic health, Tooth loss, Vulnerable population.
Abstract
Objective: To compare oral health in nursing home (NH) residents with different cognitive statuses.
Url:
DOI: 10.1111/j.1741-2358.2012.00644.x
Links to Exploration step
ISTEX:E46ABF99487010E69CB9D3590A3244C1DC32C883Le document en format XML
<record><TEI wicri:istexFullTextTei="biblStruct"><teiHeader><fileDesc><titleStmt><title xml:lang="en">Oral health in nursing home residents with different cognitive statuses</title><author><name sortKey="Chen, Xi" sort="Chen, Xi" uniqKey="Chen X" first="Xi" last="Chen">Xi Chen</name><affiliation><mods:affiliation>Department of Dental Ecology, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, NC, USA</mods:affiliation></affiliation></author><author><name sortKey="Clark, Jennifer J J" sort="Clark, Jennifer J J" uniqKey="Clark J" first="Jennifer J. J." last="Clark">Jennifer J. J. Clark</name><affiliation><mods:affiliation>Department of Biostatistics, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, NC, USA</mods:affiliation></affiliation></author><author><name sortKey="Naorungroj, Supawadee" sort="Naorungroj, Supawadee" uniqKey="Naorungroj S" first="Supawadee" last="Naorungroj">Supawadee Naorungroj</name><affiliation><mods:affiliation>Department of Epidemiology, UNC Gillings School of Global Public Health, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, NC, USA</mods:affiliation></affiliation></author></titleStmt><publicationStmt><idno type="wicri:source">ISTEX</idno><idno type="RBID">ISTEX:E46ABF99487010E69CB9D3590A3244C1DC32C883</idno><date when="2013" year="2013">2013</date><idno type="doi">10.1111/j.1741-2358.2012.00644.x</idno><idno type="url">https://api.istex.fr/document/E46ABF99487010E69CB9D3590A3244C1DC32C883/fulltext/pdf</idno><idno type="wicri:Area/Istex/Corpus">007151</idno><idno type="wicri:explorRef" wicri:stream="Istex" wicri:step="Corpus" wicri:corpus="ISTEX">007151</idno></publicationStmt><sourceDesc><biblStruct><analytic><title level="a" type="main">Oral health in nursing home residents with different cognitive statuses</title><author><name sortKey="Chen, Xi" sort="Chen, Xi" uniqKey="Chen X" first="Xi" last="Chen">Xi Chen</name><affiliation><mods:affiliation>Department of Dental Ecology, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, NC, USA</mods:affiliation></affiliation></author><author><name sortKey="Clark, Jennifer J J" sort="Clark, Jennifer J J" uniqKey="Clark J" first="Jennifer J. J." last="Clark">Jennifer J. J. Clark</name><affiliation><mods:affiliation>Department of Biostatistics, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, NC, USA</mods:affiliation></affiliation></author><author><name sortKey="Naorungroj, Supawadee" sort="Naorungroj, Supawadee" uniqKey="Naorungroj S" first="Supawadee" last="Naorungroj">Supawadee Naorungroj</name><affiliation><mods:affiliation>Department of Epidemiology, UNC Gillings School of Global Public Health, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, NC, USA</mods:affiliation></affiliation></author></analytic><monogr></monogr><series><title level="j" type="main">Gerodontology</title><title level="j" type="alt">GERODONTOLOGY</title><idno type="ISSN">0734-0664</idno><idno type="eISSN">1741-2358</idno><imprint><biblScope unit="vol">30</biblScope><biblScope unit="issue">1</biblScope><biblScope unit="page" from="49">49</biblScope><biblScope unit="page" to="60">60</biblScope><biblScope unit="page-count">12</biblScope><publisher>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</publisher><pubPlace>Oxford, UK</pubPlace><date type="published" when="2013-03">2013-03</date></imprint><idno type="ISSN">0734-0664</idno></series></biblStruct></sourceDesc><seriesStmt><idno type="ISSN">0734-0664</idno></seriesStmt></fileDesc><profileDesc><textClass><keywords scheme="KwdEn" xml:lang="en"><term>Anova</term><term>Anticholinergic</term><term>Anticholinergic burden</term><term>Anticholinergic drug scale</term><term>Aust dent</term><term>Behaviour symptoms</term><term>Caries</term><term>Categorical variables</term><term>Chapel hill</term><term>Cognitive</term><term>Cognitive assessment</term><term>Cognitive function</term><term>Cognitive impairment</term><term>Cognitive status</term><term>Continuous variables</term><term>Current medications</term><term>Demented</term><term>Demented group</term><term>Demented groups</term><term>Demented participants</term><term>Dementia</term><term>Dental care</term><term>Dental caries</term><term>Dental professionals</term><term>Dental providers</term><term>Dental records</term><term>Dentate</term><term>Dentate participants</term><term>Dentition status</term><term>Denture</term><term>Executive dysfunction</term><term>Executive function</term><term>Functional assessments</term><term>Functional impairment</term><term>Functional loss</term><term>Functional status</term><term>Functional statuses</term><term>Geriatr psychiatry</term><term>Gerodontology</term><term>Gerodontology society</term><term>Heavy plaque</term><term>Hygiene</term><term>Impairment</term><term>Internal validation</term><term>John wiley sons gerodontology</term><term>Lled</term><term>Lled teeth</term><term>Medical conditions</term><term>Medical history</term><term>Medication</term><term>National nursing home survey</term><term>Natural teeth</term><term>Nursing home residents</term><term>Nursing homes</term><term>Older adults</term><term>Oral assessment</term><term>Oral care</term><term>Oral health</term><term>Oral health status</term><term>Oral hygiene</term><term>Oral hygiene care</term><term>Oral status</term><term>Other factors</term><term>Pairwise</term><term>Pairwise comparisons</term><term>Participant</term><term>Periodontal disease</term><term>Physical mobility</term><term>Present study</term><term>Provider</term><term>Resident</term><term>Severe gingival</term><term>Spec care dentist</term><term>Study clinic</term><term>Study participants</term><term>Subjective approaches</term><term>Subjective judgements</term><term>Systematic review</term><term>Systemic health</term><term>Tooth loss</term><term>Vulnerable population</term></keywords><keywords scheme="Teeft" xml:lang="en"><term>Anova</term><term>Anticholinergic</term><term>Anticholinergic burden</term><term>Anticholinergic drug scale</term><term>Aust dent</term><term>Behaviour symptoms</term><term>Caries</term><term>Categorical variables</term><term>Chapel hill</term><term>Cognitive</term><term>Cognitive assessment</term><term>Cognitive function</term><term>Cognitive impairment</term><term>Cognitive status</term><term>Continuous variables</term><term>Current medications</term><term>Demented</term><term>Demented group</term><term>Demented groups</term><term>Demented participants</term><term>Dementia</term><term>Dental care</term><term>Dental caries</term><term>Dental professionals</term><term>Dental providers</term><term>Dental records</term><term>Dentate</term><term>Dentate participants</term><term>Dentition status</term><term>Denture</term><term>Executive dysfunction</term><term>Executive function</term><term>Functional assessments</term><term>Functional impairment</term><term>Functional loss</term><term>Functional status</term><term>Functional statuses</term><term>Geriatr psychiatry</term><term>Gerodontology</term><term>Gerodontology society</term><term>Heavy plaque</term><term>Hygiene</term><term>Impairment</term><term>Internal validation</term><term>John wiley sons gerodontology</term><term>Lled</term><term>Lled teeth</term><term>Medical conditions</term><term>Medical history</term><term>Medication</term><term>National nursing home survey</term><term>Natural teeth</term><term>Nursing home residents</term><term>Nursing homes</term><term>Older adults</term><term>Oral assessment</term><term>Oral care</term><term>Oral health</term><term>Oral health status</term><term>Oral hygiene</term><term>Oral hygiene care</term><term>Oral status</term><term>Other factors</term><term>Pairwise</term><term>Pairwise comparisons</term><term>Participant</term><term>Periodontal disease</term><term>Physical mobility</term><term>Present study</term><term>Provider</term><term>Resident</term><term>Severe gingival</term><term>Spec care dentist</term><term>Study clinic</term><term>Study participants</term><term>Subjective approaches</term><term>Subjective judgements</term><term>Systematic review</term><term>Systemic health</term><term>Tooth loss</term><term>Vulnerable population</term></keywords></textClass></profileDesc></teiHeader><front><div type="abstract">Objective: To compare oral health in nursing home (NH) residents with different cognitive statuses.</div></front></TEI><istex><corpusName>wiley</corpusName><keywords><teeft><json:string>dementia</json:string><json:string>caries</json:string><json:string>oral health</json:string><json:string>cognitive impairment</json:string><json:string>gerodontology</json:string><json:string>impairment</json:string><json:string>oral hygiene care</json:string><json:string>cognitive</json:string><json:string>cognitive status</json:string><json:string>anticholinergic</json:string><json:string>nursing home residents</json:string><json:string>demented</json:string><json:string>john wiley sons gerodontology</json:string><json:string>dentate</json:string><json:string>gerodontology society</json:string><json:string>denture</json:string><json:string>oral hygiene</json:string><json:string>pairwise</json:string><json:string>dentate participants</json:string><json:string>anova</json:string><json:string>older adults</json:string><json:string>physical mobility</json:string><json:string>medical history</json:string><json:string>study participants</json:string><json:string>provider</json:string><json:string>study clinic</json:string><json:string>participant</json:string><json:string>cognitive assessment</json:string><json:string>demented group</json:string><json:string>continuous variables</json:string><json:string>lled</json:string><json:string>hygiene</json:string><json:string>dental caries</json:string><json:string>categorical variables</json:string><json:string>pairwise comparisons</json:string><json:string>demented participants</json:string><json:string>functional assessments</json:string><json:string>systemic health</json:string><json:string>present study</json:string><json:string>functional statuses</json:string><json:string>lled teeth</json:string><json:string>other factors</json:string><json:string>chapel hill</json:string><json:string>anticholinergic burden</json:string><json:string>cognitive function</json:string><json:string>dental providers</json:string><json:string>dental records</json:string><json:string>systematic review</json:string><json:string>dental care</json:string><json:string>periodontal disease</json:string><json:string>demented groups</json:string><json:string>oral health status</json:string><json:string>functional loss</json:string><json:string>medication</json:string><json:string>resident</json:string><json:string>nursing homes</json:string><json:string>anticholinergic drug scale</json:string><json:string>behaviour symptoms</json:string><json:string>current medications</json:string><json:string>tooth loss</json:string><json:string>national nursing home survey</json:string><json:string>natural teeth</json:string><json:string>functional impairment</json:string><json:string>oral assessment</json:string><json:string>dentition status</json:string><json:string>medical conditions</json:string><json:string>oral care</json:string><json:string>subjective judgements</json:string><json:string>heavy plaque</json:string><json:string>severe gingival</json:string><json:string>geriatr psychiatry</json:string><json:string>subjective approaches</json:string><json:string>executive function</json:string><json:string>executive dysfunction</json:string><json:string>internal validation</json:string><json:string>functional status</json:string><json:string>vulnerable population</json:string><json:string>aust dent</json:string><json:string>spec care dentist</json:string><json:string>oral status</json:string><json:string>dental professionals</json:string></teeft></keywords><author><json:item><name>Xi Chen</name><affiliations><json:string>Department of Dental Ecology, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, NC, USA</json:string></affiliations></json:item><json:item><name>Jennifer J. J. Clark</name><affiliations><json:string>Department of Biostatistics, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, NC, USA</json:string></affiliations></json:item><json:item><name>Supawadee Naorungroj</name><affiliations><json:string>Department of Epidemiology, UNC Gillings School of Global Public Health, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, NC, USA</json:string></affiliations></json:item></author><subject><json:item><lang><json:string>eng</json:string></lang><value>oral health</value></json:item><json:item><lang><json:string>eng</json:string></lang><value>caries</value></json:item><json:item><lang><json:string>eng</json:string></lang><value>long‐term care</value></json:item><json:item><lang><json:string>eng</json:string></lang><value>cognitive impairment</value></json:item></subject><articleId><json:string>GER644</json:string></articleId><arkIstex>ark:/67375/WNG-X20HN2LT-J</arkIstex><language><json:string>eng</json:string></language><originalGenre><json:string>article</json:string></originalGenre><abstract>Objective: To compare oral health in nursing home (NH) residents with different cognitive statuses.</abstract><qualityIndicators><score>7.168</score><pdfWordCount>6599</pdfWordCount><pdfCharCount>45023</pdfCharCount><pdfVersion>1.3</pdfVersion><pdfPageCount>12</pdfPageCount><pdfPageSize>595.276 x 790.866 pts</pdfPageSize><refBibsNative>true</refBibsNative><abstractWordCount>14</abstractWordCount><abstractCharCount>100</abstractCharCount><keywordCount>4</keywordCount></qualityIndicators><title>Oral health in nursing home residents with different cognitive statuses</title><pmid><json:string>22364512</json:string></pmid><genre><json:string>article</json:string></genre><host><title>Gerodontology</title><language><json:string>unknown</json:string></language><doi><json:string>10.1111/(ISSN)1741-2358</json:string></doi><issn><json:string>0734-0664</json:string></issn><eissn><json:string>1741-2358</json:string></eissn><publisherId><json:string>GER</json:string></publisherId><volume>30</volume><issue>1</issue><pages><first>49</first><last>60</last><total>12</total></pages><genre><json:string>journal</json:string></genre><subject><json:item><value>Original article</value></json:item></subject></host><namedEntities><unitex><date><json:string>2013</json:string><json:string>2008</json:string></date><geogName></geogName><orgName><json:string>Wilder Foundation of St Paul</json:string><json:string>Wilder Foundation</json:string><json:string>Department of Biostatistics, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, NC, USA</json:string><json:string>SAS Institute Inc</json:string><json:string>University of Minnesota</json:string><json:string>University of Minnesota School of Dentistry</json:string><json:string>University of North Carolina Institute Review Board</json:string><json:string>Department of Epidemiology, UNC Gillings School of Global Public Health, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, NC, USA</json:string><json:string>Alzheimer’s association</json:string><json:string>US National Nursing Home Survey</json:string><json:string>U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services</json:string><json:string>American Health Care Association</json:string><json:string>Administration on Aging.</json:string></orgName><orgName_funder></orgName_funder><orgName_provider></orgName_provider><persName><json:string>John Wiley</json:string><json:string>Gerodontology Society</json:string></persName><placeName><json:string>Capacity</json:string></placeName><ref_url></ref_url><ref_bibl><json:string>X. Chen et al.</json:string></ref_bibl><bibl></bibl></unitex></namedEntities><ark><json:string>ark:/67375/WNG-X20HN2LT-J</json:string></ark><categories><wos><json:string>1 - science</json:string><json:string>2 - geriatrics & gerontology</json:string><json:string>2 - dentistry, oral surgery & medicine</json:string></wos><scienceMetrix><json:string>1 - health sciences</json:string><json:string>2 - clinical medicine</json:string><json:string>3 - dentistry</json:string></scienceMetrix><scopus><json:string>1 - Health Sciences</json:string><json:string>2 - Medicine</json:string><json:string>3 - Geriatrics and Gerontology</json:string><json:string>1 - Health Sciences</json:string><json:string>2 - Dentistry</json:string><json:string>3 - General Dentistry</json:string></scopus></categories><publicationDate>2013</publicationDate><copyrightDate>2013</copyrightDate><doi><json:string>10.1111/j.1741-2358.2012.00644.x</json:string></doi><id>E46ABF99487010E69CB9D3590A3244C1DC32C883</id><score>1</score><fulltext><json:item><extension>pdf</extension><original>true</original><mimetype>application/pdf</mimetype><uri>https://api.istex.fr/document/E46ABF99487010E69CB9D3590A3244C1DC32C883/fulltext/pdf</uri></json:item><json:item><extension>zip</extension><original>false</original><mimetype>application/zip</mimetype><uri>https://api.istex.fr/document/E46ABF99487010E69CB9D3590A3244C1DC32C883/fulltext/zip</uri></json:item><istex:fulltextTEI uri="https://api.istex.fr/document/E46ABF99487010E69CB9D3590A3244C1DC32C883/fulltext/tei"><teiHeader><fileDesc><titleStmt><title level="a" type="main">Oral health in nursing home residents with different cognitive statuses</title></titleStmt><publicationStmt><authority>ISTEX</authority><publisher>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</publisher><pubPlace>Oxford, UK</pubPlace><availability><licence>© 2012 The Gerodontology Society and John Wiley & Sons A/S</licence></availability><date type="published" when="2013-03"></date></publicationStmt><notesStmt><note type="content-type" subtype="article" source="article" scheme="https://content-type.data.istex.fr/ark:/67375/XTP-6N5SZHKN-D">article</note><note type="publication-type" subtype="journal" scheme="https://publication-type.data.istex.fr/ark:/67375/JMC-0GLKJH51-B">journal</note></notesStmt><sourceDesc><biblStruct type="article"><analytic><title level="a" type="main">Oral health in nursing home residents with different cognitive statuses</title><title level="a" type="short">Oral health in nursing home residents</title><author xml:id="author-0000"><persName><forename type="first">Xi</forename><surname>Chen</surname></persName><affiliation>Department of Dental Ecology, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, NC, USA<address><country key="US"></country></address></affiliation></author><author xml:id="author-0001"><persName><forename type="first">Jennifer J. J.</forename><surname>Clark</surname></persName><affiliation>Department of Biostatistics, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, NC, USA<address><country key="US"></country></address></affiliation></author><author xml:id="author-0002"><persName><forename type="first">Supawadee</forename><surname>Naorungroj</surname></persName><affiliation>Department of Epidemiology, UNC Gillings School of Global Public Health, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, NC, USA<address><country key="US"></country></address></affiliation></author><idno type="istex">E46ABF99487010E69CB9D3590A3244C1DC32C883</idno><idno type="ark">ark:/67375/WNG-X20HN2LT-J</idno><idno type="DOI">10.1111/j.1741-2358.2012.00644.x</idno><idno type="unit">GER644</idno><idno type="toTypesetVersion">file:GER.GER644.pdf</idno></analytic><monogr><title level="j" type="main">Gerodontology</title><title level="j" type="alt">GERODONTOLOGY</title><idno type="pISSN">0734-0664</idno><idno type="eISSN">1741-2358</idno><idno type="book-DOI">10.1111/(ISSN)1741-2358</idno><idno type="book-part-DOI">10.1111/ger.2013.30.issue-1</idno><idno type="product">GER</idno><idno type="publisherDivision">ST</idno><imprint><biblScope unit="vol">30</biblScope><biblScope unit="issue">1</biblScope><biblScope unit="page" from="49">49</biblScope><biblScope unit="page" to="60">60</biblScope><biblScope unit="page-count">12</biblScope><publisher>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</publisher><pubPlace>Oxford, UK</pubPlace><date type="published" when="2013-03"></date></imprint></monogr></biblStruct></sourceDesc></fileDesc><profileDesc><abstract xml:lang="en" style="main"><p><hi rend="bold">Objective: </hi> To compare oral health in nursing home (NH) residents with different cognitive statuses.</p><p><hi rend="bold">Background: </hi> Oral health is a significant issue for NH residents because of its relationships to quality of life, systemic health and well‐being. It is known that oral health is poor in NH residents. However, how oral health differs in NH residents with different cognitive statuses remains unclear.</p><p><hi rend="bold">Materials and methods: </hi> Nine hundred and two NH residents were retrospectively recruited from a community‐based geriatric dental clinic in Minnesota, USA. Comprehensive medical, dental, cognitive and functional assessments were completed for the participants. On the basis of medical history and cognitive status, participants were categorized into three groups: without cognitive impairment (non‐impaired group), with cognitive impairment but no dementia (impaired group) and with dementia (demented group). ANOVA, Chi‐square and Fisher’s exact tests were used to compare medical, dental and functional statuses between groups.</p><p><hi rend="bold">Results: </hi> Oral hygiene was poor in NH residents. Forty per cent of participants in the impaired group were edentulous, significantly higher than the edentulism rate in the demented group (29%, <hi rend="italic">p</hi> = 0.01). More than 60% of the participants lost 16 or more teeth prior to examination. Depending on their cognitive status, 82–92% of the participants arrived with one or more caries or retained root. Dentate participants in the impaired and demented groups averaged about six caries or retained roots, significantly more than 4.7 caries or retained roots in the non‐impaired group (<hi rend="italic">p</hi> = 0.01).</p><p><hi rend="bold">Conclusion: </hi> Oral health was poor but slightly different in NH residents with different cognitive and functional statuses.</p></abstract><textClass><keywords xml:lang="en"><term xml:id="k1">oral health</term><term xml:id="k2">caries</term><term xml:id="k3">long‐term care</term><term xml:id="k4">cognitive impairment</term></keywords><keywords rend="tocHeading1"><term>Original Articles</term></keywords><keywords rend="articleCategory"><term>Original article</term></keywords></textClass><langUsage><language ident="en"></language></langUsage></profileDesc></teiHeader></istex:fulltextTEI><json:item><extension>txt</extension><original>false</original><mimetype>text/plain</mimetype><uri>https://api.istex.fr/document/E46ABF99487010E69CB9D3590A3244C1DC32C883/fulltext/txt</uri></json:item></fulltext><metadata><istex:metadataXml wicri:clean="Wiley, elements deleted: body"><istex:xmlDeclaration>version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" standalone="yes"</istex:xmlDeclaration><istex:document><component version="2.0" type="serialArticle" xml:lang="en"><header><publicationMeta level="product"><publisherInfo><publisherName>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</publisherName><publisherLoc>Oxford, UK</publisherLoc></publisherInfo><doi origin="wiley" registered="yes">10.1111/(ISSN)1741-2358</doi><issn type="print">0734-0664</issn><issn type="electronic">1741-2358</issn><idGroup><id type="product" value="GER"></id><id type="publisherDivision" value="ST"></id></idGroup><titleGroup><title type="main" sort="GERODONTOLOGY">Gerodontology</title></titleGroup></publicationMeta><publicationMeta level="part" position="03101"><doi origin="wiley">10.1111/ger.2013.30.issue-1</doi><numberingGroup><numbering type="journalVolume" number="30">30</numbering><numbering type="journalIssue" number="1">1</numbering></numberingGroup><coverDate startDate="2013-03">March 2013</coverDate></publicationMeta><publicationMeta level="unit" type="article" position="8" status="forIssue"><doi origin="wiley">10.1111/j.1741-2358.2012.00644.x</doi><idGroup><id type="unit" value="GER644"></id></idGroup><countGroup><count type="pageTotal" number="12"></count></countGroup><titleGroup><title type="tocHeading1"><i>Original Articles</i></title><title type="articleCategory"><i>Original article</i></title></titleGroup><copyright>© 2012 The Gerodontology Society and John Wiley & Sons A/S</copyright><eventGroup><event type="xmlConverted" agent="Converter:BPG_TO_WML3G version:3.1.9 mode:FullText" date="2013-01-28"></event><event agent="SPS" date="2013-01-28" type="xmlCorrected"></event><event type="publishedOnlineEarlyUnpaginated" date="2012-02-26"></event><event type="firstOnline" date="2012-02-26"></event><event type="publishedOnlineFinalForm" date="2013-02-05"></event><event type="xmlConverted" agent="Converter:WILEY_ML3G_TO_WILEY_ML3GV2 version:3.8.8" date="2014-01-26"></event><event type="xmlConverted" agent="Converter:WML3G_To_WML3G version:4.6.4 mode:FullText" date="2015-10-02"></event></eventGroup><numberingGroup><numbering type="pageFirst" number="49">49</numbering><numbering type="pageLast" number="60">60</numbering></numberingGroup><correspondenceTo>Xi Chen, Department of Dental Ecology, University of North Carolina School of Dentistry, Campus Box 7450, Chapel Hill, NC 27599, USA.
Tel.: 919 966 8522
Fax: 919 843 1170
E‐mail: <email>xi_chen@dentistry.unc.edu</email></correspondenceTo><linkGroup><link type="toTypesetVersion" href="file:GER.GER644.pdf"></link></linkGroup></publicationMeta><contentMeta><unparsedEditorialHistory>Accepted 25 September 2011</unparsedEditorialHistory><countGroup><count type="figureTotal" number="0"></count><count type="tableTotal" number="6"></count></countGroup><titleGroup><title type="main">Oral health in nursing home residents with different cognitive statuses</title><title type="shortAuthors"><i>X. Chen et al.</i></title><title type="short"><i>Oral health in nursing home residents</i></title></titleGroup><creators><creator creatorRole="author" xml:id="cr1" affiliationRef="#a1"><personName><givenNames>Xi</givenNames><familyName>Chen</familyName></personName></creator><creator creatorRole="author" xml:id="cr2" affiliationRef="#a2"><personName><givenNames>Jennifer J. J.</givenNames><familyName>Clark</familyName></personName></creator><creator creatorRole="author" xml:id="cr3" affiliationRef="#a3"><personName><givenNames>Supawadee</givenNames><familyName>Naorungroj</familyName></personName></creator></creators><affiliationGroup><affiliation xml:id="a1" countryCode="US"><unparsedAffiliation>Department of Dental Ecology, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, NC, USA</unparsedAffiliation></affiliation><affiliation xml:id="a2" countryCode="US"><unparsedAffiliation>Department of Biostatistics, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, NC, USA</unparsedAffiliation></affiliation><affiliation xml:id="a3" countryCode="US"><unparsedAffiliation>Department of Epidemiology, UNC Gillings School of Global Public Health, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, NC, USA</unparsedAffiliation></affiliation></affiliationGroup><keywordGroup xml:lang="en"><keyword xml:id="k1">oral health</keyword><keyword xml:id="k2">caries</keyword><keyword xml:id="k3">long‐term care</keyword><keyword xml:id="k4">cognitive impairment</keyword></keywordGroup><abstractGroup><abstract type="main" xml:lang="en"><p><b>Objective: </b> To compare oral health in nursing home (NH) residents with different cognitive statuses.</p><p><b>Background: </b> Oral health is a significant issue for NH residents because of its relationships to quality of life, systemic health and well‐being. It is known that oral health is poor in NH residents. However, how oral health differs in NH residents with different cognitive statuses remains unclear.</p><p><b>Materials and methods: </b> Nine hundred and two NH residents were retrospectively recruited from a community‐based geriatric dental clinic in Minnesota, USA. Comprehensive medical, dental, cognitive and functional assessments were completed for the participants. On the basis of medical history and cognitive status, participants were categorized into three groups: without cognitive impairment (non‐impaired group), with cognitive impairment but no dementia (impaired group) and with dementia (demented group). ANOVA, Chi‐square and Fisher’s exact tests were used to compare medical, dental and functional statuses between groups.</p><p><b>Results: </b> Oral hygiene was poor in NH residents. Forty per cent of participants in the impaired group were edentulous, significantly higher than the edentulism rate in the demented group (29%, <i>p</i> = 0.01). More than 60% of the participants lost 16 or more teeth prior to examination. Depending on their cognitive status, 82–92% of the participants arrived with one or more caries or retained root. Dentate participants in the impaired and demented groups averaged about six caries or retained roots, significantly more than 4.7 caries or retained roots in the non‐impaired group (<i>p</i> = 0.01).</p><p><b>Conclusion: </b> Oral health was poor but slightly different in NH residents with different cognitive and functional statuses.</p></abstract></abstractGroup></contentMeta></header></component></istex:document></istex:metadataXml><mods version="3.6"><titleInfo lang="en"><title>Oral health in nursing home residents with different cognitive statuses</title></titleInfo><titleInfo type="abbreviated" lang="en"><title>Oral health in nursing home residents</title></titleInfo><titleInfo type="alternative" contentType="CDATA" lang="en"><title>Oral health in nursing home residents with different cognitive statuses</title></titleInfo><name type="personal"><namePart type="given">Xi</namePart><namePart type="family">Chen</namePart><affiliation>Department of Dental Ecology, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, NC, USA</affiliation><role><roleTerm type="text">author</roleTerm></role></name><name type="personal"><namePart type="given">Jennifer J. J.</namePart><namePart type="family">Clark</namePart><affiliation>Department of Biostatistics, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, NC, USA</affiliation><role><roleTerm type="text">author</roleTerm></role></name><name type="personal"><namePart type="given">Supawadee</namePart><namePart type="family">Naorungroj</namePart><affiliation>Department of Epidemiology, UNC Gillings School of Global Public Health, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, NC, USA</affiliation><role><roleTerm type="text">author</roleTerm></role></name><typeOfResource>text</typeOfResource><genre type="article" displayLabel="article" authority="ISTEX" authorityURI="https://content-type.data.istex.fr" valueURI="https://content-type.data.istex.fr/ark:/67375/XTP-6N5SZHKN-D">article</genre><originInfo><publisher>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</publisher><place><placeTerm type="text">Oxford, UK</placeTerm></place><dateIssued encoding="w3cdtf">2013-03</dateIssued><edition>Accepted 25 September 2011</edition><copyrightDate encoding="w3cdtf">2013</copyrightDate></originInfo><language><languageTerm type="code" authority="rfc3066">en</languageTerm><languageTerm type="code" authority="iso639-2b">eng</languageTerm></language><physicalDescription><extent unit="figures">0</extent><extent unit="tables">6</extent></physicalDescription><abstract>Objective: To compare oral health in nursing home (NH) residents with different cognitive statuses.</abstract><abstract>Background: Oral health is a significant issue for NH residents because of its relationships to quality of life, systemic health and well‐being. It is known that oral health is poor in NH residents. However, how oral health differs in NH residents with different cognitive statuses remains unclear.</abstract><abstract>Materials and methods: Nine hundred and two NH residents were retrospectively recruited from a community‐based geriatric dental clinic in Minnesota, USA. Comprehensive medical, dental, cognitive and functional assessments were completed for the participants. On the basis of medical history and cognitive status, participants were categorized into three groups: without cognitive impairment (non‐impaired group), with cognitive impairment but no dementia (impaired group) and with dementia (demented group). ANOVA, Chi‐square and Fisher’s exact tests were used to compare medical, dental and functional statuses between groups.</abstract><abstract>Results: Oral hygiene was poor in NH residents. Forty per cent of participants in the impaired group were edentulous, significantly higher than the edentulism rate in the demented group (29%, p = 0.01). More than 60% of the participants lost 16 or more teeth prior to examination. Depending on their cognitive status, 82–92% of the participants arrived with one or more caries or retained root. Dentate participants in the impaired and demented groups averaged about six caries or retained roots, significantly more than 4.7 caries or retained roots in the non‐impaired group (p = 0.01).</abstract><abstract>Conclusion: Oral health was poor but slightly different in NH residents with different cognitive and functional statuses.</abstract><subject lang="en"><genre>keywords</genre><topic>oral health</topic><topic>caries</topic><topic>long‐term care</topic><topic>cognitive impairment</topic></subject><relatedItem type="host"><titleInfo><title>Gerodontology</title></titleInfo><genre type="journal" authority="ISTEX" authorityURI="https://publication-type.data.istex.fr" valueURI="https://publication-type.data.istex.fr/ark:/67375/JMC-0GLKJH51-B">journal</genre><subject><genre>article-category</genre><topic>Original article</topic></subject><identifier type="ISSN">0734-0664</identifier><identifier type="eISSN">1741-2358</identifier><identifier type="DOI">10.1111/(ISSN)1741-2358</identifier><identifier type="PublisherID">GER</identifier><part><date>2013</date><detail type="volume"><caption>vol.</caption><number>30</number></detail><detail type="issue"><caption>no.</caption><number>1</number></detail><extent unit="pages"><start>49</start><end>60</end><total>12</total></extent></part></relatedItem><identifier type="istex">E46ABF99487010E69CB9D3590A3244C1DC32C883</identifier><identifier type="ark">ark:/67375/WNG-X20HN2LT-J</identifier><identifier type="DOI">10.1111/j.1741-2358.2012.00644.x</identifier><identifier type="ArticleID">GER644</identifier><accessCondition type="use and reproduction" contentType="copyright">© 2012 The Gerodontology Society and John Wiley & Sons A/S</accessCondition><recordInfo><recordContentSource authority="ISTEX" authorityURI="https://loaded-corpus.data.istex.fr" valueURI="https://loaded-corpus.data.istex.fr/ark:/67375/XBH-L0C46X92-X">wiley</recordContentSource><recordOrigin>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</recordOrigin></recordInfo></mods><json:item><extension>json</extension><original>false</original><mimetype>application/json</mimetype><uri>https://api.istex.fr/document/E46ABF99487010E69CB9D3590A3244C1DC32C883/metadata/json</uri></json:item></metadata><serie></serie></istex></record>Pour manipuler ce document sous Unix (Dilib)
EXPLOR_STEP=$WICRI_ROOT/Wicri/Santé/explor/EdenteV2/Data/Istex/Corpus
HfdSelect -h $EXPLOR_STEP/biblio.hfd -nk 007151 | SxmlIndent | more
Ou
HfdSelect -h $EXPLOR_AREA/Data/Istex/Corpus/biblio.hfd -nk 007151 | SxmlIndent | more
Pour mettre un lien sur cette page dans le réseau Wicri
{{Explor lien
|wiki= Wicri/Santé
|area= EdenteV2
|flux= Istex
|étape= Corpus
|type= RBID
|clé= ISTEX:E46ABF99487010E69CB9D3590A3244C1DC32C883
|texte= Oral health in nursing home residents with different cognitive statuses
}}
| This area was generated with Dilib version V0.6.32. |  |