Assessing prosthodontic dental treatment needs in older adults in Thailand: normative vs. sociodental approaches
Identifieur interne : 006E27 ( Istex/Corpus ); précédent : 006E26; suivant : 006E28Assessing prosthodontic dental treatment needs in older adults in Thailand: normative vs. sociodental approaches
Auteurs : Patcharawan Srisilapanan ; Narumanas Korwanich ; Aubrey SheihamSource :
- Special Care in Dentistry [ 0275-1879 ] ; 2003-07.
English descriptors
- KwdEn :
- Accessible treatment need, Behavioral propensity, Clinical criteria, Community dent health, Complete dentures, Daily performances, Dent, Dent educ, Dental care, Dental questionnaire, Dental service, Dental services, Dental treatment, Dental treatment need, Denture, Different levels, Doctoral thesis, Economic status health promotion, Edentulous, Edentulous people, Financial problems, General health, General health status, General treatment need, Health status, Metropolitan area, Municipal communities, National diet, Normal health, Normal weight, Normative, Normative assessment, Normative need, Normative treatment need, Nutritional status, Nutritional survey, Oidp, Older adults, Older people, Older thai adults, Oral examination, Oral health, Oral health status, Oral impacts, Oral problems, Present study, Propensity, Propensityrelated treatment need, Prosthodontic, Prosthodontic treatment, Public health, Sociodental, Sociodental approach, Sociodental approaches, Sociodental model, Sociodental treatment, Spec care dentist, Treatment need, Treatment need assessment, Treatment need assessment model, Treatment need estimation.
- Teeft :
- Accessible treatment need, Behavioral propensity, Clinical criteria, Community dent health, Complete dentures, Daily performances, Dent, Dent educ, Dental care, Dental questionnaire, Dental service, Dental services, Dental treatment, Dental treatment need, Denture, Different levels, Doctoral thesis, Economic status health promotion, Edentulous, Edentulous people, Financial problems, General health, General health status, General treatment need, Health status, Metropolitan area, Municipal communities, National diet, Normal health, Normal weight, Normative, Normative assessment, Normative need, Normative treatment need, Nutritional status, Nutritional survey, Oidp, Older adults, Older people, Older thai adults, Oral examination, Oral health, Oral health status, Oral impacts, Oral problems, Present study, Propensity, Propensityrelated treatment need, Prosthodontic, Prosthodontic treatment, Public health, Sociodental, Sociodental approach, Sociodental approaches, Sociodental model, Sociodental treatment, Spec care dentist, Treatment need, Treatment need assessment, Treatment need assessment model, Treatment need estimation.
Abstract
The authors compared the estimated prosthodontic treatment needs of edentulous older adults when using normative and sociodental approaches. This cross‐sectional study involved a non‐random sample of 158 edentulous adults, aged 60 to 74 years, who were living independently in metropolitan Chiang Mai, Thailand. Each subject was given an oral examination and was interviewed. The dental questionnaire and the clinical criteria were adapted from the National Diet and Nutritional Survey for People Aged 65 and Older and included the Oral Impacts on Daily Performances sociodental indicator. Of the 158 subjects, we found using a normative assessment that 79.7% had a treatment need for complete dentures; 60.5% of those adults had impact‐related treatment needs. Estimated treatment need dropped by about 40% when subjects were assessed using the sociodental approach. We concluded that large reductions in normative need estimates for complete dentures were apparent using a sociodental approach to assess prosthodontic dental treatment needs of older people.
Url:
DOI: 10.1111/j.1754-4505.2003.tb00298.x
Links to Exploration step
ISTEX:DDE6B35B46D9DBA764D35941A98C86BB38599EF8Le document en format XML
<record><TEI wicri:istexFullTextTei="biblStruct"><teiHeader><fileDesc><titleStmt><title xml:lang="en">Assessing prosthodontic dental treatment needs in older adults in Thailand: normative vs. sociodental approaches</title><author><name sortKey="Srisilapanan, Patcharawan" sort="Srisilapanan, Patcharawan" uniqKey="Srisilapanan P" first="Patcharawan" last="Srisilapanan">Patcharawan Srisilapanan</name><affiliation><mods:affiliation>Department of Community Dentistry, Faculty of Dentistry, Chiang Mai University, Chiang Mai 50200, Thailand</mods:affiliation></affiliation><affiliation><mods:affiliation>Department of Epidemiology and Public Health, Royal Free and University College London Medical School, University of London, London WC1 6BT, United Kingdom</mods:affiliation></affiliation><affiliation><mods:affiliation>E-mail: decd001@chiangmai.ac.th</mods:affiliation></affiliation></author><author><name sortKey="Korwanich, Narumanas" sort="Korwanich, Narumanas" uniqKey="Korwanich N" first="Narumanas" last="Korwanich">Narumanas Korwanich</name><affiliation><mods:affiliation>Department of Community Dentistry, Faculty of Dentistry, Chiang Mai University, Chiang Mai 50200, Thailand</mods:affiliation></affiliation></author><author><name sortKey="Sheiham, Aubrey" sort="Sheiham, Aubrey" uniqKey="Sheiham A" first="Aubrey" last="Sheiham">Aubrey Sheiham</name><affiliation><mods:affiliation>Department of Epidemiology and Public Health, Royal Free and University College London Medical School, University of London, London WC1 6BT, United Kingdom</mods:affiliation></affiliation></author></titleStmt><publicationStmt><idno type="wicri:source">ISTEX</idno><idno type="RBID">ISTEX:DDE6B35B46D9DBA764D35941A98C86BB38599EF8</idno><date when="2003" year="2003">2003</date><idno type="doi">10.1111/j.1754-4505.2003.tb00298.x</idno><idno type="url">https://api.istex.fr/document/DDE6B35B46D9DBA764D35941A98C86BB38599EF8/fulltext/pdf</idno><idno type="wicri:Area/Istex/Corpus">006E27</idno><idno type="wicri:explorRef" wicri:stream="Istex" wicri:step="Corpus" wicri:corpus="ISTEX">006E27</idno></publicationStmt><sourceDesc><biblStruct><analytic><title level="a" type="main">Assessing prosthodontic dental treatment needs in older adults in Thailand: normative <hi rend="italic">vs.</hi> sociodental approaches</title><author><name sortKey="Srisilapanan, Patcharawan" sort="Srisilapanan, Patcharawan" uniqKey="Srisilapanan P" first="Patcharawan" last="Srisilapanan">Patcharawan Srisilapanan</name><affiliation><mods:affiliation>Department of Community Dentistry, Faculty of Dentistry, Chiang Mai University, Chiang Mai 50200, Thailand</mods:affiliation></affiliation><affiliation><mods:affiliation>Department of Epidemiology and Public Health, Royal Free and University College London Medical School, University of London, London WC1 6BT, United Kingdom</mods:affiliation></affiliation><affiliation><mods:affiliation>E-mail: decd001@chiangmai.ac.th</mods:affiliation></affiliation></author><author><name sortKey="Korwanich, Narumanas" sort="Korwanich, Narumanas" uniqKey="Korwanich N" first="Narumanas" last="Korwanich">Narumanas Korwanich</name><affiliation><mods:affiliation>Department of Community Dentistry, Faculty of Dentistry, Chiang Mai University, Chiang Mai 50200, Thailand</mods:affiliation></affiliation></author><author><name sortKey="Sheiham, Aubrey" sort="Sheiham, Aubrey" uniqKey="Sheiham A" first="Aubrey" last="Sheiham">Aubrey Sheiham</name><affiliation><mods:affiliation>Department of Epidemiology and Public Health, Royal Free and University College London Medical School, University of London, London WC1 6BT, United Kingdom</mods:affiliation></affiliation></author></analytic><monogr></monogr><series><title level="j" type="main">Special Care in Dentistry</title><title level="j" type="alt">SPECIAL CARE IN DENTISTRY</title><idno type="ISSN">0275-1879</idno><idno type="eISSN">1754-4505</idno><imprint><biblScope unit="vol">23</biblScope><biblScope unit="issue">4</biblScope><biblScope unit="page" from="131">131</biblScope><biblScope unit="page" to="134">134</biblScope><biblScope unit="page-count">4</biblScope><publisher>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</publisher><pubPlace>Oxford, UK</pubPlace><date type="published" when="2003-07">2003-07</date></imprint><idno type="ISSN">0275-1879</idno></series></biblStruct></sourceDesc><seriesStmt><idno type="ISSN">0275-1879</idno></seriesStmt></fileDesc><profileDesc><textClass><keywords scheme="KwdEn" xml:lang="en"><term>Accessible treatment need</term><term>Behavioral propensity</term><term>Clinical criteria</term><term>Community dent health</term><term>Complete dentures</term><term>Daily performances</term><term>Dent</term><term>Dent educ</term><term>Dental care</term><term>Dental questionnaire</term><term>Dental service</term><term>Dental services</term><term>Dental treatment</term><term>Dental treatment need</term><term>Denture</term><term>Different levels</term><term>Doctoral thesis</term><term>Economic status health promotion</term><term>Edentulous</term><term>Edentulous people</term><term>Financial problems</term><term>General health</term><term>General health status</term><term>General treatment need</term><term>Health status</term><term>Metropolitan area</term><term>Municipal communities</term><term>National diet</term><term>Normal health</term><term>Normal weight</term><term>Normative</term><term>Normative assessment</term><term>Normative need</term><term>Normative treatment need</term><term>Nutritional status</term><term>Nutritional survey</term><term>Oidp</term><term>Older adults</term><term>Older people</term><term>Older thai adults</term><term>Oral examination</term><term>Oral health</term><term>Oral health status</term><term>Oral impacts</term><term>Oral problems</term><term>Present study</term><term>Propensity</term><term>Propensityrelated treatment need</term><term>Prosthodontic</term><term>Prosthodontic treatment</term><term>Public health</term><term>Sociodental</term><term>Sociodental approach</term><term>Sociodental approaches</term><term>Sociodental model</term><term>Sociodental treatment</term><term>Spec care dentist</term><term>Treatment need</term><term>Treatment need assessment</term><term>Treatment need assessment model</term><term>Treatment need estimation</term></keywords><keywords scheme="Teeft" xml:lang="en"><term>Accessible treatment need</term><term>Behavioral propensity</term><term>Clinical criteria</term><term>Community dent health</term><term>Complete dentures</term><term>Daily performances</term><term>Dent</term><term>Dent educ</term><term>Dental care</term><term>Dental questionnaire</term><term>Dental service</term><term>Dental services</term><term>Dental treatment</term><term>Dental treatment need</term><term>Denture</term><term>Different levels</term><term>Doctoral thesis</term><term>Economic status health promotion</term><term>Edentulous</term><term>Edentulous people</term><term>Financial problems</term><term>General health</term><term>General health status</term><term>General treatment need</term><term>Health status</term><term>Metropolitan area</term><term>Municipal communities</term><term>National diet</term><term>Normal health</term><term>Normal weight</term><term>Normative</term><term>Normative assessment</term><term>Normative need</term><term>Normative treatment need</term><term>Nutritional status</term><term>Nutritional survey</term><term>Oidp</term><term>Older adults</term><term>Older people</term><term>Older thai adults</term><term>Oral examination</term><term>Oral health</term><term>Oral health status</term><term>Oral impacts</term><term>Oral problems</term><term>Present study</term><term>Propensity</term><term>Propensityrelated treatment need</term><term>Prosthodontic</term><term>Prosthodontic treatment</term><term>Public health</term><term>Sociodental</term><term>Sociodental approach</term><term>Sociodental approaches</term><term>Sociodental model</term><term>Sociodental treatment</term><term>Spec care dentist</term><term>Treatment need</term><term>Treatment need assessment</term><term>Treatment need assessment model</term><term>Treatment need estimation</term></keywords></textClass></profileDesc></teiHeader><front><div type="abstract" xml:lang="en">The authors compared the estimated prosthodontic treatment needs of edentulous older adults when using normative and sociodental approaches. This cross‐sectional study involved a non‐random sample of 158 edentulous adults, aged 60 to 74 years, who were living independently in metropolitan Chiang Mai, Thailand. Each subject was given an oral examination and was interviewed. The dental questionnaire and the clinical criteria were adapted from the National Diet and Nutritional Survey for People Aged 65 and Older and included the Oral Impacts on Daily Performances sociodental indicator. Of the 158 subjects, we found using a normative assessment that 79.7% had a treatment need for complete dentures; 60.5% of those adults had impact‐related treatment needs. Estimated treatment need dropped by about 40% when subjects were assessed using the sociodental approach. We concluded that large reductions in normative need estimates for complete dentures were apparent using a sociodental approach to assess prosthodontic dental treatment needs of older people.</div></front></TEI><istex><corpusName>wiley</corpusName><keywords><teeft><json:string>treatment need</json:string><json:string>sociodental</json:string><json:string>denture</json:string><json:string>sociodental approach</json:string><json:string>normative</json:string><json:string>complete dentures</json:string><json:string>oidp</json:string><json:string>older people</json:string><json:string>prosthodontic</json:string><json:string>propensity</json:string><json:string>edentulous</json:string><json:string>dental services</json:string><json:string>oral impacts</json:string><json:string>normative treatment need</json:string><json:string>spec care dentist</json:string><json:string>general health</json:string><json:string>normative need</json:string><json:string>accessible treatment need</json:string><json:string>oral health</json:string><json:string>health status</json:string><json:string>normative assessment</json:string><json:string>general health status</json:string><json:string>daily performances</json:string><json:string>sociodental approaches</json:string><json:string>nutritional status</json:string><json:string>dental treatment need</json:string><json:string>financial problems</json:string><json:string>community dent health</json:string><json:string>metropolitan area</json:string><json:string>municipal communities</json:string><json:string>clinical criteria</json:string><json:string>different levels</json:string><json:string>behavioral propensity</json:string><json:string>national diet</json:string><json:string>dent</json:string><json:string>sociodental treatment</json:string><json:string>public health</json:string><json:string>prosthodontic treatment</json:string><json:string>nutritional survey</json:string><json:string>treatment need assessment</json:string><json:string>dental treatment</json:string><json:string>treatment need estimation</json:string><json:string>present study</json:string><json:string>older adults</json:string><json:string>oral examination</json:string><json:string>general treatment need</json:string><json:string>propensityrelated treatment need</json:string><json:string>economic status health promotion</json:string><json:string>treatment need assessment model</json:string><json:string>edentulous people</json:string><json:string>normal health</json:string><json:string>normal weight</json:string><json:string>older thai adults</json:string><json:string>sociodental model</json:string><json:string>oral problems</json:string><json:string>dental care</json:string><json:string>dental questionnaire</json:string><json:string>oral health status</json:string><json:string>dent educ</json:string><json:string>doctoral thesis</json:string><json:string>dental service</json:string></teeft></keywords><author><json:item><name>Patcharawan Srisilapanan DDS, MS, PhD</name><affiliations><json:string>Department of Community Dentistry, Faculty of Dentistry, Chiang Mai University, Chiang Mai 50200, Thailand</json:string><json:string>Department of Epidemiology and Public Health, Royal Free and University College London Medical School, University of London, London WC1 6BT, United Kingdom</json:string><json:string>E-mail: decd001@chiangmai.ac.th</json:string></affiliations></json:item><json:item><name>Narumanas Korwanich DDS, MPH</name><affiliations><json:string>Department of Community Dentistry, Faculty of Dentistry, Chiang Mai University, Chiang Mai 50200, Thailand</json:string></affiliations></json:item><json:item><name>Aubrey Sheiham PhD</name><affiliations><json:string>Department of Epidemiology and Public Health, Royal Free and University College London Medical School, University of London, London WC1 6BT, United Kingdom</json:string></affiliations></json:item></author><subject><json:item><lang><json:string>eng</json:string></lang><value>dental</value></json:item><json:item><lang><json:string>eng</json:string></lang><value>prosthodontic</value></json:item><json:item><lang><json:string>eng</json:string></lang><value>edentulous</value></json:item><json:item><lang><json:string>eng</json:string></lang><value>treatment needs</value></json:item><json:item><lang><json:string>eng</json:string></lang><value>sociodental</value></json:item><json:item><lang><json:string>eng</json:string></lang><value>elderly</value></json:item></subject><articleId><json:string>SCD131</json:string></articleId><arkIstex>ark:/67375/WNG-BJ80JW2X-8</arkIstex><language><json:string>eng</json:string></language><originalGenre><json:string>article</json:string></originalGenre><abstract>The authors compared the estimated prosthodontic treatment needs of edentulous older adults when using normative and sociodental approaches. This cross‐sectional study involved a non‐random sample of 158 edentulous adults, aged 60 to 74 years, who were living independently in metropolitan Chiang Mai, Thailand. Each subject was given an oral examination and was interviewed. The dental questionnaire and the clinical criteria were adapted from the National Diet and Nutritional Survey for People Aged 65 and Older and included the Oral Impacts on Daily Performances sociodental indicator. Of the 158 subjects, we found using a normative assessment that 79.7% had a treatment need for complete dentures; 60.5% of those adults had impact‐related treatment needs. Estimated treatment need dropped by about 40% when subjects were assessed using the sociodental approach. We concluded that large reductions in normative need estimates for complete dentures were apparent using a sociodental approach to assess prosthodontic dental treatment needs of older people.</abstract><qualityIndicators><score>6.637</score><pdfWordCount>2789</pdfWordCount><pdfCharCount>17000</pdfCharCount><pdfVersion>1.4</pdfVersion><pdfPageCount>4</pdfPageCount><pdfPageSize>609.36 x 787.679 pts</pdfPageSize><refBibsNative>true</refBibsNative><abstractWordCount>154</abstractWordCount><abstractCharCount>1059</abstractCharCount><keywordCount>6</keywordCount></qualityIndicators><title>Assessing prosthodontic dental treatment needs in older adults in Thailand: normative vs. sociodental approaches</title><pmid><json:string>14765891</json:string></pmid><genre><json:string>article</json:string></genre><host><title>Special Care in Dentistry</title><language><json:string>unknown</json:string></language><doi><json:string>10.1111/(ISSN)1754-4505</json:string></doi><issn><json:string>0275-1879</json:string></issn><eissn><json:string>1754-4505</json:string></eissn><publisherId><json:string>SCD</json:string></publisherId><volume>23</volume><issue>4</issue><pages><first>131</first><last>134</last><total>4</total></pages><genre><json:string>journal</json:string></genre></host><namedEntities><unitex><date><json:string>2003</json:string></date><geogName></geogName><orgName><json:string>National Diet and Nutrition</json:string><json:string>NDNS</json:string><json:string>National Diet and Nutritional Survey</json:string><json:string>University of London</json:string></orgName><orgName_funder></orgName_funder><orgName_provider></orgName_provider><persName></persName><placeName><json:string>Thailand</json:string><json:string>United Kingdom</json:string></placeName><ref_url></ref_url><ref_bibl></ref_bibl><bibl></bibl></unitex></namedEntities><ark><json:string>ark:/67375/WNG-BJ80JW2X-8</json:string></ark><categories><wos></wos><scienceMetrix><json:string>1 - health sciences</json:string><json:string>2 - clinical medicine</json:string><json:string>3 - dentistry</json:string></scienceMetrix><scopus><json:string>1 - Health Sciences</json:string><json:string>2 - Dentistry</json:string><json:string>3 - General Dentistry</json:string></scopus><inist><json:string>1 - sciences appliquees, technologies et medecines</json:string><json:string>2 - sciences biologiques et medicales</json:string><json:string>3 - sciences medicales</json:string></inist></categories><publicationDate>2003</publicationDate><copyrightDate>2003</copyrightDate><doi><json:string>10.1111/j.1754-4505.2003.tb00298.x</json:string></doi><id>DDE6B35B46D9DBA764D35941A98C86BB38599EF8</id><score>1</score><fulltext><json:item><extension>pdf</extension><original>true</original><mimetype>application/pdf</mimetype><uri>https://api.istex.fr/document/DDE6B35B46D9DBA764D35941A98C86BB38599EF8/fulltext/pdf</uri></json:item><json:item><extension>zip</extension><original>false</original><mimetype>application/zip</mimetype><uri>https://api.istex.fr/document/DDE6B35B46D9DBA764D35941A98C86BB38599EF8/fulltext/zip</uri></json:item><istex:fulltextTEI uri="https://api.istex.fr/document/DDE6B35B46D9DBA764D35941A98C86BB38599EF8/fulltext/tei"><teiHeader><fileDesc><titleStmt><title level="a" type="main">Assessing prosthodontic dental treatment needs in older adults in Thailand: normative <hi rend="italic">vs.</hi> sociodental approaches</title></titleStmt><publicationStmt><authority>ISTEX</authority><publisher>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</publisher><pubPlace>Oxford, UK</pubPlace><date type="published" when="2003-07"></date></publicationStmt><notesStmt><note type="content-type" subtype="article" source="article" scheme="https://content-type.data.istex.fr/ark:/67375/XTP-6N5SZHKN-D">article</note><note type="publication-type" subtype="journal" scheme="https://publication-type.data.istex.fr/ark:/67375/JMC-0GLKJH51-B">journal</note></notesStmt><sourceDesc><biblStruct type="article"><analytic><title level="a" type="main">Assessing prosthodontic dental treatment needs in older adults in Thailand: normative <hi rend="italic">vs.</hi> sociodental approaches</title><author xml:id="author-0000" role="corresp"><persName><forename type="first">Patcharawan</forename><surname>Srisilapanan</surname><roleName type="degree">DDS, MS, PhD</roleName></persName><affiliation>Department of Community Dentistry, Faculty of Dentistry, Chiang Mai University, Chiang Mai 50200, Thailand<address><country key="TH"></country></address></affiliation><affiliation>Department of Epidemiology and Public Health, Royal Free and University College London Medical School, University of London, London WC1 6BT, United Kingdom<address><country key="GB"></country></address></affiliation><affiliation>*decd001@chiangmai.ac.th</affiliation></author><author xml:id="author-0001"><persName><forename type="first">Narumanas</forename><surname>Korwanich</surname><roleName type="degree">DDS, MPH</roleName></persName><affiliation>Department of Community Dentistry, Faculty of Dentistry, Chiang Mai University, Chiang Mai 50200, Thailand<address><country key="TH"></country></address></affiliation></author><author xml:id="author-0002"><persName><forename type="first">Aubrey</forename><surname>Sheiham</surname><roleName type="degree">PhD</roleName></persName><affiliation>Department of Epidemiology and Public Health, Royal Free and University College London Medical School, University of London, London WC1 6BT, United Kingdom<address><country key="GB"></country></address></affiliation></author><idno type="istex">DDE6B35B46D9DBA764D35941A98C86BB38599EF8</idno><idno type="ark">ark:/67375/WNG-BJ80JW2X-8</idno><idno type="DOI">10.1111/j.1754-4505.2003.tb00298.x</idno><idno type="unit">SCD131</idno><idno type="toTypesetVersion">file:SCD.SCD131.pdf</idno></analytic><monogr><title level="j" type="main">Special Care in Dentistry</title><title level="j" type="alt">SPECIAL CARE IN DENTISTRY</title><idno type="pISSN">0275-1879</idno><idno type="eISSN">1754-4505</idno><idno type="book-DOI">10.1111/(ISSN)1754-4505</idno><idno type="book-part-DOI">10.1111/scd.2003.23.issue-4</idno><idno type="product">SCD</idno><idno type="publisherDivision">ST</idno><imprint><biblScope unit="vol">23</biblScope><biblScope unit="issue">4</biblScope><biblScope unit="page" from="131">131</biblScope><biblScope unit="page" to="134">134</biblScope><biblScope unit="page-count">4</biblScope><publisher>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</publisher><pubPlace>Oxford, UK</pubPlace><date type="published" when="2003-07"></date></imprint></monogr></biblStruct></sourceDesc></fileDesc><profileDesc><abstract xml:lang="en" style="main"><head>ABSTRACT</head><p>The authors compared the estimated prosthodontic treatment needs of edentulous older adults when using normative and sociodental approaches. This cross‐sectional study involved a non‐random sample of 158 edentulous adults, aged 60 to 74 years, who were living independently in metropolitan Chiang Mai, Thailand. Each subject was given an oral examination and was interviewed. The dental questionnaire and the clinical criteria were adapted from the National Diet and Nutritional Survey for People Aged 65 and Older and included the Oral Impacts on Daily Performances sociodental indicator. Of the 158 subjects, we found using a normative assessment that 79.7% had a treatment need for complete dentures; 60.5% of those adults had impact‐related treatment needs. Estimated treatment need dropped by about 40% when subjects were assessed using the sociodental approach. We concluded that large reductions in normative need estimates for complete dentures were apparent using a sociodental approach to assess prosthodontic dental treatment needs of older people.</p></abstract><textClass><keywords xml:lang="en"><term xml:id="k1">dental</term><term xml:id="k2">prosthodontic</term><term xml:id="k3">edentulous</term><term xml:id="k4">treatment needs</term><term xml:id="k5">sociodental</term><term xml:id="k6">elderly</term></keywords><keywords rend="tocHeading1"><term>Original Article</term></keywords></textClass><langUsage><language ident="en"></language></langUsage></profileDesc></teiHeader></istex:fulltextTEI><json:item><extension>txt</extension><original>false</original><mimetype>text/plain</mimetype><uri>https://api.istex.fr/document/DDE6B35B46D9DBA764D35941A98C86BB38599EF8/fulltext/txt</uri></json:item></fulltext><metadata><istex:metadataXml wicri:clean="Wiley, elements deleted: body"><istex:xmlDeclaration>version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" standalone="yes"</istex:xmlDeclaration><istex:document><component version="2.0" type="serialArticle" xml:lang="en"><header><publicationMeta level="product"><publisherInfo><publisherName>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</publisherName><publisherLoc>Oxford, UK</publisherLoc></publisherInfo><doi origin="wiley" registered="yes">10.1111/(ISSN)1754-4505</doi><issn type="print">0275-1879</issn><issn type="electronic">1754-4505</issn><idGroup><id type="product" value="SCD"></id><id type="publisherDivision" value="ST"></id></idGroup><titleGroup><title type="main" sort="SPECIAL CARE IN DENTISTRY">Special Care in Dentistry</title></titleGroup></publicationMeta><publicationMeta level="part" position="07004"><doi origin="wiley">10.1111/scd.2003.23.issue-4</doi><numberingGroup><numbering type="journalVolume" number="23">23</numbering><numbering type="journalIssue" number="4">4</numbering></numberingGroup><coverDate startDate="2003-07">July 2003</coverDate></publicationMeta><publicationMeta level="unit" type="article" position="0013100" status="forIssue"><doi origin="wiley">10.1111/j.1754-4505.2003.tb00298.x</doi><idGroup><id type="unit" value="SCD131"></id></idGroup><countGroup><count type="pageTotal" number="4"></count></countGroup><titleGroup><title type="tocHeading1">Original Article</title></titleGroup><eventGroup><event type="firstOnline" date="2008-03-12"></event><event type="publishedOnlineFinalForm" date="2008-03-12"></event><event type="xmlConverted" agent="Converter:BPG_TO_WML3G version:2.3.2 mode:FullText source:HeaderRef result:HeaderRef" date="2010-03-02"></event><event type="xmlConverted" agent="Converter:WILEY_ML3G_TO_WILEY_ML3GV2 version:3.8.8" date="2014-02-08"></event><event type="xmlConverted" agent="Converter:WML3G_To_WML3G version:4.1.7 mode:FullText,remove_FC" date="2014-11-03"></event></eventGroup><numberingGroup><numbering type="pageFirst" number="131">131</numbering><numbering type="pageLast" number="134">134</numbering></numberingGroup><correspondenceTo>*<email>decd001@chiangmai.ac.th</email></correspondenceTo><linkGroup><link type="toTypesetVersion" href="file:SCD.SCD131.pdf"></link></linkGroup></publicationMeta><contentMeta><countGroup><count type="referenceTotal" number="26"></count><count type="linksCrossRef" number="5"></count></countGroup><titleGroup><title type="main">Assessing prosthodontic dental treatment needs in older adults in Thailand: normative <i>vs.</i> sociodental approaches</title></titleGroup><creators><creator creatorRole="author" xml:id="cr1" affiliationRef="#a1 #a2" corresponding="yes"><personName><givenNames>Patcharawan</givenNames><familyName>Srisilapanan</familyName><degrees>DDS, MS, PhD</degrees></personName></creator><creator creatorRole="author" xml:id="cr2" affiliationRef="#a1"><personName><givenNames>Narumanas</givenNames><familyName>Korwanich</familyName><degrees>DDS, MPH</degrees></personName></creator><creator creatorRole="author" xml:id="cr3" affiliationRef="#a2"><personName><givenNames>Aubrey</givenNames><familyName>Sheiham</familyName><degrees>PhD</degrees></personName></creator></creators><affiliationGroup><affiliation xml:id="a1" countryCode="TH"><unparsedAffiliation>Department of Community Dentistry, Faculty of Dentistry, Chiang Mai University, Chiang Mai 50200, Thailand</unparsedAffiliation></affiliation><affiliation xml:id="a2" countryCode="GB"><unparsedAffiliation>Department of Epidemiology and Public Health, Royal Free and University College London Medical School, University of London, London WC1 6BT, United Kingdom</unparsedAffiliation></affiliation></affiliationGroup><keywordGroup xml:lang="en"><keyword xml:id="k1">dental</keyword><keyword xml:id="k2">prosthodontic</keyword><keyword xml:id="k3">edentulous</keyword><keyword xml:id="k4">treatment needs</keyword><keyword xml:id="k5">sociodental</keyword><keyword xml:id="k6">elderly</keyword></keywordGroup><abstractGroup><abstract type="main" xml:lang="en"><title type="main">ABSTRACT</title><p>The authors compared the estimated prosthodontic treatment needs of edentulous older adults when using normative and sociodental approaches. This cross‐sectional study involved a non‐random sample of 158 edentulous adults, aged 60 to 74 years, who were living independently in metropolitan Chiang Mai, Thailand. Each subject was given an oral examination and was interviewed. The dental questionnaire and the clinical criteria were adapted from the National Diet and Nutritional Survey for People Aged 65 and Older and included the Oral Impacts on Daily Performances sociodental indicator. Of the 158 subjects, we found using a normative assessment that 79.7% had a treatment need for complete dentures; 60.5% of those adults had impact‐related treatment needs. Estimated treatment need dropped by about 40% when subjects were assessed using the sociodental approach. We concluded that large reductions in normative need estimates for complete dentures were apparent using a sociodental approach to assess prosthodontic dental treatment needs of older people.</p></abstract></abstractGroup></contentMeta></header></component></istex:document></istex:metadataXml><mods version="3.6"><titleInfo lang="en"><title>Assessing prosthodontic dental treatment needs in older adults in Thailand: normative vs. sociodental approaches</title></titleInfo><titleInfo type="alternative" contentType="CDATA" lang="en"><title>Assessing prosthodontic dental treatment needs in older adults in Thailand: normative vs. sociodental approaches</title></titleInfo><name type="personal"><namePart type="given">Patcharawan</namePart><namePart type="family">Srisilapanan</namePart><namePart type="termsOfAddress">DDS, MS, PhD</namePart><affiliation>Department of Community Dentistry, Faculty of Dentistry, Chiang Mai University, Chiang Mai 50200, Thailand</affiliation><affiliation>Department of Epidemiology and Public Health, Royal Free and University College London Medical School, University of London, London WC1 6BT, United Kingdom</affiliation><affiliation>E-mail: decd001@chiangmai.ac.th</affiliation><role><roleTerm type="text">author</roleTerm></role></name><name type="personal"><namePart type="given">Narumanas</namePart><namePart type="family">Korwanich</namePart><namePart type="termsOfAddress">DDS, MPH</namePart><affiliation>Department of Community Dentistry, Faculty of Dentistry, Chiang Mai University, Chiang Mai 50200, Thailand</affiliation><role><roleTerm type="text">author</roleTerm></role></name><name type="personal"><namePart type="given">Aubrey</namePart><namePart type="family">Sheiham</namePart><namePart type="termsOfAddress">PhD</namePart><affiliation>Department of Epidemiology and Public Health, Royal Free and University College London Medical School, University of London, London WC1 6BT, United Kingdom</affiliation><role><roleTerm type="text">author</roleTerm></role></name><typeOfResource>text</typeOfResource><genre type="article" displayLabel="article" authority="ISTEX" authorityURI="https://content-type.data.istex.fr" valueURI="https://content-type.data.istex.fr/ark:/67375/XTP-6N5SZHKN-D">article</genre><originInfo><publisher>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</publisher><place><placeTerm type="text">Oxford, UK</placeTerm></place><dateIssued encoding="w3cdtf">2003-07</dateIssued><copyrightDate encoding="w3cdtf">2003</copyrightDate></originInfo><language><languageTerm type="code" authority="rfc3066">en</languageTerm><languageTerm type="code" authority="iso639-2b">eng</languageTerm></language><physicalDescription><extent unit="references">26</extent><extent unit="linksCrossRef">5</extent></physicalDescription><abstract lang="en">The authors compared the estimated prosthodontic treatment needs of edentulous older adults when using normative and sociodental approaches. This cross‐sectional study involved a non‐random sample of 158 edentulous adults, aged 60 to 74 years, who were living independently in metropolitan Chiang Mai, Thailand. Each subject was given an oral examination and was interviewed. The dental questionnaire and the clinical criteria were adapted from the National Diet and Nutritional Survey for People Aged 65 and Older and included the Oral Impacts on Daily Performances sociodental indicator. Of the 158 subjects, we found using a normative assessment that 79.7% had a treatment need for complete dentures; 60.5% of those adults had impact‐related treatment needs. Estimated treatment need dropped by about 40% when subjects were assessed using the sociodental approach. We concluded that large reductions in normative need estimates for complete dentures were apparent using a sociodental approach to assess prosthodontic dental treatment needs of older people.</abstract><subject lang="en"><genre>keywords</genre><topic>dental</topic><topic>prosthodontic</topic><topic>edentulous</topic><topic>treatment needs</topic><topic>sociodental</topic><topic>elderly</topic></subject><relatedItem type="host"><titleInfo><title>Special Care in Dentistry</title></titleInfo><genre type="journal" authority="ISTEX" authorityURI="https://publication-type.data.istex.fr" valueURI="https://publication-type.data.istex.fr/ark:/67375/JMC-0GLKJH51-B">journal</genre><identifier type="ISSN">0275-1879</identifier><identifier type="eISSN">1754-4505</identifier><identifier type="DOI">10.1111/(ISSN)1754-4505</identifier><identifier type="PublisherID">SCD</identifier><part><date>2003</date><detail type="volume"><caption>vol.</caption><number>23</number></detail><detail type="issue"><caption>no.</caption><number>4</number></detail><extent unit="pages"><start>131</start><end>134</end><total>4</total></extent></part></relatedItem><identifier type="istex">DDE6B35B46D9DBA764D35941A98C86BB38599EF8</identifier><identifier type="ark">ark:/67375/WNG-BJ80JW2X-8</identifier><identifier type="DOI">10.1111/j.1754-4505.2003.tb00298.x</identifier><identifier type="ArticleID">SCD131</identifier><recordInfo><recordContentSource authority="ISTEX" authorityURI="https://loaded-corpus.data.istex.fr" valueURI="https://loaded-corpus.data.istex.fr/ark:/67375/XBH-L0C46X92-X">wiley</recordContentSource><recordOrigin>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</recordOrigin></recordInfo></mods><json:item><extension>json</extension><original>false</original><mimetype>application/json</mimetype><uri>https://api.istex.fr/document/DDE6B35B46D9DBA764D35941A98C86BB38599EF8/metadata/json</uri></json:item></metadata><serie></serie></istex></record>Pour manipuler ce document sous Unix (Dilib)
EXPLOR_STEP=$WICRI_ROOT/Wicri/Santé/explor/EdenteV2/Data/Istex/Corpus
HfdSelect -h $EXPLOR_STEP/biblio.hfd -nk 006E27 | SxmlIndent | more
Ou
HfdSelect -h $EXPLOR_AREA/Data/Istex/Corpus/biblio.hfd -nk 006E27 | SxmlIndent | more
Pour mettre un lien sur cette page dans le réseau Wicri
{{Explor lien
|wiki= Wicri/Santé
|area= EdenteV2
|flux= Istex
|étape= Corpus
|type= RBID
|clé= ISTEX:DDE6B35B46D9DBA764D35941A98C86BB38599EF8
|texte= Assessing prosthodontic dental treatment needs in older adults in Thailand: normative vs. sociodental approaches
}}
| This area was generated with Dilib version V0.6.32. |  |