Serveur d'exploration sur le patient édenté

Attention, ce site est en cours de développement !
Attention, site généré par des moyens informatiques à partir de corpus bruts.
Les informations ne sont donc pas validées.

Radiographic evaluation of modern oral implants with emphasis on crestal bone level and relevance to peri‐implant health

Identifieur interne : 006D07 ( Istex/Corpus ); précédent : 006D06; suivant : 006D08

Radiographic evaluation of modern oral implants with emphasis on crestal bone level and relevance to peri‐implant health

Auteurs : Hugo De Bruyn ; Stefan Vandeweghe ; Christian Ruyffelaert ; Jan Cosyn ; Lars Sennerby

Source :

RBID : ISTEX:DBC652E24D551050E4B7791D1D4A93518B0EDD47

English descriptors

Abstract

Implant stability and maintenance of stable crestal bone level are prerequisites for the successful long‐term function of oral implants, and continuous crestal bone loss constitutes a threat to the longevity of implant–supported prosthetic constructions. The prevalence/incidence and reasons for crestal bone loss are under debate. Some authors regard infection (i.e. peri‐implantitis) as the cause for virtually all bone loss, while others see crestal bone loss as an unavoidable phenomenon following surgery and implant loading. Irrespective of the cause of continuous crestal bone loss, correct usage and scientifically sound interpretation of radiographs are of utmost importance for evaluation of oral implants. The periapical radiographic technique is currently the preferred method for evaluating implant health based on bone loss, and digital radiographs allow easy standardization of the image contrast. It is suggested that baseline radiographs should be taken at the time the transmucosal part pierces the mucosal tissues and annually thereafter. The number of unreadable radiographs should be presented in scientific publications to give insights into the quality of the radiographic examination. It is suggested that not only mean values, but also the range of bone levels, should be presented to describe the proportion of implants that show continuous crestal bone loss. In the absence of other clinical symptoms, bleeding on probing around implants seems to be a weak indicator of ongoing or future loss of crestal bone. According to recent longitudinal studies on modern implant surfaces peri‐implantitis defined as ‘infection with suppuration associated with clinically significant progressing crestal bone loss’ occurs with a prevalence of less than 5 % in implants with 10 years in function.

Url:
DOI: 10.1111/prd.12004

Links to Exploration step

ISTEX:DBC652E24D551050E4B7791D1D4A93518B0EDD47

Le document en format XML

<record>
<TEI wicri:istexFullTextTei="biblStruct">
<teiHeader>
<fileDesc>
<titleStmt>
<title xml:lang="en">Radiographic evaluation of modern oral implants with emphasis on crestal bone level and relevance to peri‐implant health</title>
<author>
<name sortKey="De Bruyn, Hugo" sort="De Bruyn, Hugo" uniqKey="De Bruyn H" first="Hugo" last="De Bruyn">Hugo De Bruyn</name>
</author>
<author>
<name sortKey="Vandeweghe, Stefan" sort="Vandeweghe, Stefan" uniqKey="Vandeweghe S" first="Stefan" last="Vandeweghe">Stefan Vandeweghe</name>
</author>
<author>
<name sortKey="Ruyffelaert, Christian" sort="Ruyffelaert, Christian" uniqKey="Ruyffelaert C" first="Christian" last="Ruyffelaert">Christian Ruyffelaert</name>
</author>
<author>
<name sortKey="Cosyn, Jan" sort="Cosyn, Jan" uniqKey="Cosyn J" first="Jan" last="Cosyn">Jan Cosyn</name>
</author>
<author>
<name sortKey="Sennerby, Lars" sort="Sennerby, Lars" uniqKey="Sennerby L" first="Lars" last="Sennerby">Lars Sennerby</name>
</author>
</titleStmt>
<publicationStmt>
<idno type="wicri:source">ISTEX</idno>
<idno type="RBID">ISTEX:DBC652E24D551050E4B7791D1D4A93518B0EDD47</idno>
<date when="2013" year="2013">2013</date>
<idno type="doi">10.1111/prd.12004</idno>
<idno type="url">https://api.istex.fr/document/DBC652E24D551050E4B7791D1D4A93518B0EDD47/fulltext/pdf</idno>
<idno type="wicri:Area/Istex/Corpus">006D07</idno>
<idno type="wicri:explorRef" wicri:stream="Istex" wicri:step="Corpus" wicri:corpus="ISTEX">006D07</idno>
</publicationStmt>
<sourceDesc>
<biblStruct>
<analytic>
<title level="a" type="main">Radiographic evaluation of modern oral implants with emphasis on crestal bone level and relevance to peri‐implant health</title>
<author>
<name sortKey="De Bruyn, Hugo" sort="De Bruyn, Hugo" uniqKey="De Bruyn H" first="Hugo" last="De Bruyn">Hugo De Bruyn</name>
</author>
<author>
<name sortKey="Vandeweghe, Stefan" sort="Vandeweghe, Stefan" uniqKey="Vandeweghe S" first="Stefan" last="Vandeweghe">Stefan Vandeweghe</name>
</author>
<author>
<name sortKey="Ruyffelaert, Christian" sort="Ruyffelaert, Christian" uniqKey="Ruyffelaert C" first="Christian" last="Ruyffelaert">Christian Ruyffelaert</name>
</author>
<author>
<name sortKey="Cosyn, Jan" sort="Cosyn, Jan" uniqKey="Cosyn J" first="Jan" last="Cosyn">Jan Cosyn</name>
</author>
<author>
<name sortKey="Sennerby, Lars" sort="Sennerby, Lars" uniqKey="Sennerby L" first="Lars" last="Sennerby">Lars Sennerby</name>
</author>
</analytic>
<monogr></monogr>
<series>
<title level="j" type="main">Periodontology 2000</title>
<title level="j" type="alt">PERIODONTOLOGY 2000</title>
<idno type="ISSN">0906-6713</idno>
<idno type="eISSN">1600-0757</idno>
<imprint>
<biblScope unit="vol">62</biblScope>
<biblScope unit="issue">1</biblScope>
<biblScope unit="page" from="256">256</biblScope>
<biblScope unit="page" to="270">270</biblScope>
<biblScope unit="page-count">15</biblScope>
<publisher>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</publisher>
<pubPlace>Oxford, UK</pubPlace>
<date type="published" when="2013-06">2013-06</date>
</imprint>
<idno type="ISSN">0906-6713</idno>
</series>
</biblStruct>
</sourceDesc>
<seriesStmt>
<idno type="ISSN">0906-6713</idno>
</seriesStmt>
</fileDesc>
<profileDesc>
<textClass>
<keywords scheme="KwdEn" xml:lang="en">
<term>Abutment</term>
<term>Albrektsson</term>
<term>Anterior maxilla</term>
<term>Baseline</term>
<term>Bone</term>
<term>Bone level</term>
<term>Bone levels</term>
<term>Bone loss</term>
<term>Branemark</term>
<term>Branemark implants</term>
<term>Bruyn</term>
<term>Case series</term>
<term>Clin</term>
<term>Clin implant dent relat</term>
<term>Clin periodontol</term>
<term>Clinical outcome</term>
<term>Clinical parameters</term>
<term>Collaert</term>
<term>Cone beam</term>
<term>Cosyn</term>
<term>Crestal</term>
<term>Crestal bone</term>
<term>Crestal bone loss</term>
<term>Daily practice</term>
<term>Defect</term>
<term>Dent</term>
<term>Dental implants</term>
<term>Dentomaxillofac radiol</term>
<term>Edentulous</term>
<term>Edentulous jaws</term>
<term>Edentulous mandible</term>
<term>Edentulous patients</term>
<term>Grondahl</term>
<term>Implant</term>
<term>Implant dentistry</term>
<term>Implant failure</term>
<term>Implant placement</term>
<term>Initial bone</term>
<term>Intraoral radiographs</term>
<term>Longitudinal study</term>
<term>Mandible</term>
<term>Marginal bone level</term>
<term>Marginal bone loss</term>
<term>Maxilla</term>
<term>Maxillofac</term>
<term>Modern implant surfaces</term>
<term>Multiple implants</term>
<term>Oral implantol</term>
<term>Oral implants</term>
<term>Oral maxillofac implants</term>
<term>Oral pathol</term>
<term>Oral surg</term>
<term>Orthopantomographs</term>
<term>Osseointegrated</term>
<term>Osseointegrated implants</term>
<term>Other hand</term>
<term>Panoramic</term>
<term>Panoramic radiography</term>
<term>Periapical</term>
<term>Periapical radiographs</term>
<term>Periodontal</term>
<term>Periodontol</term>
<term>Periodontology</term>
<term>Prospective studies</term>
<term>Prospective study</term>
<term>Prosthet dent</term>
<term>Prosthetic</term>
<term>Radiograph</term>
<term>Radiographic</term>
<term>Radiographic assessment</term>
<term>Radiographic diagnosis</term>
<term>Radiographic evaluation</term>
<term>Radiographic evaluations</term>
<term>Radiographic imaging</term>
<term>Radiography</term>
<term>Radiol</term>
<term>Readability</term>
<term>Relat</term>
<term>Retrospective</term>
<term>Retrospective studies</term>
<term>Retrospective study</term>
<term>Risk indicators</term>
<term>Single implants</term>
<term>Small changes</term>
<term>Statistical unit</term>
<term>Survival rate</term>
<term>Technical complications</term>
<term>Tomography</term>
<term>True bone loss</term>
<term>Unreadable radiographs</term>
<term>Vandeweghe</term>
<term>Velde</term>
</keywords>
<keywords scheme="Teeft" xml:lang="en">
<term>Abutment</term>
<term>Albrektsson</term>
<term>Anterior maxilla</term>
<term>Baseline</term>
<term>Bone</term>
<term>Bone level</term>
<term>Bone levels</term>
<term>Bone loss</term>
<term>Branemark</term>
<term>Branemark implants</term>
<term>Bruyn</term>
<term>Case series</term>
<term>Clin</term>
<term>Clin implant dent relat</term>
<term>Clin periodontol</term>
<term>Clinical outcome</term>
<term>Clinical parameters</term>
<term>Collaert</term>
<term>Cone beam</term>
<term>Cosyn</term>
<term>Crestal</term>
<term>Crestal bone</term>
<term>Crestal bone loss</term>
<term>Daily practice</term>
<term>Defect</term>
<term>Dent</term>
<term>Dental implants</term>
<term>Dentomaxillofac radiol</term>
<term>Edentulous</term>
<term>Edentulous jaws</term>
<term>Edentulous mandible</term>
<term>Edentulous patients</term>
<term>Grondahl</term>
<term>Implant</term>
<term>Implant dentistry</term>
<term>Implant failure</term>
<term>Implant placement</term>
<term>Initial bone</term>
<term>Intraoral radiographs</term>
<term>Longitudinal study</term>
<term>Mandible</term>
<term>Marginal bone level</term>
<term>Marginal bone loss</term>
<term>Maxilla</term>
<term>Maxillofac</term>
<term>Modern implant surfaces</term>
<term>Multiple implants</term>
<term>Oral implantol</term>
<term>Oral implants</term>
<term>Oral maxillofac implants</term>
<term>Oral pathol</term>
<term>Oral surg</term>
<term>Orthopantomographs</term>
<term>Osseointegrated</term>
<term>Osseointegrated implants</term>
<term>Other hand</term>
<term>Panoramic</term>
<term>Panoramic radiography</term>
<term>Periapical</term>
<term>Periapical radiographs</term>
<term>Periodontal</term>
<term>Periodontol</term>
<term>Periodontology</term>
<term>Prospective studies</term>
<term>Prospective study</term>
<term>Prosthet dent</term>
<term>Prosthetic</term>
<term>Radiograph</term>
<term>Radiographic</term>
<term>Radiographic assessment</term>
<term>Radiographic diagnosis</term>
<term>Radiographic evaluation</term>
<term>Radiographic evaluations</term>
<term>Radiographic imaging</term>
<term>Radiography</term>
<term>Radiol</term>
<term>Readability</term>
<term>Relat</term>
<term>Retrospective</term>
<term>Retrospective studies</term>
<term>Retrospective study</term>
<term>Risk indicators</term>
<term>Single implants</term>
<term>Small changes</term>
<term>Statistical unit</term>
<term>Survival rate</term>
<term>Technical complications</term>
<term>Tomography</term>
<term>True bone loss</term>
<term>Unreadable radiographs</term>
<term>Vandeweghe</term>
<term>Velde</term>
</keywords>
</textClass>
</profileDesc>
</teiHeader>
<front>
<div type="abstract" xml:lang="en">Implant stability and maintenance of stable crestal bone level are prerequisites for the successful long‐term function of oral implants, and continuous crestal bone loss constitutes a threat to the longevity of implant–supported prosthetic constructions. The prevalence/incidence and reasons for crestal bone loss are under debate. Some authors regard infection (i.e. peri‐implantitis) as the cause for virtually all bone loss, while others see crestal bone loss as an unavoidable phenomenon following surgery and implant loading. Irrespective of the cause of continuous crestal bone loss, correct usage and scientifically sound interpretation of radiographs are of utmost importance for evaluation of oral implants. The periapical radiographic technique is currently the preferred method for evaluating implant health based on bone loss, and digital radiographs allow easy standardization of the image contrast. It is suggested that baseline radiographs should be taken at the time the transmucosal part pierces the mucosal tissues and annually thereafter. The number of unreadable radiographs should be presented in scientific publications to give insights into the quality of the radiographic examination. It is suggested that not only mean values, but also the range of bone levels, should be presented to describe the proportion of implants that show continuous crestal bone loss. In the absence of other clinical symptoms, bleeding on probing around implants seems to be a weak indicator of ongoing or future loss of crestal bone. According to recent longitudinal studies on modern implant surfaces peri‐implantitis defined as ‘infection with suppuration associated with clinically significant progressing crestal bone loss’ occurs with a prevalence of less than 5 % in implants with 10 years in function.</div>
</front>
</TEI>
<istex>
<corpusName>wiley</corpusName>
<keywords>
<teeft>
<json:string>implant</json:string>
<json:string>radiograph</json:string>
<json:string>radiographic</json:string>
<json:string>periapical</json:string>
<json:string>clin</json:string>
<json:string>bone loss</json:string>
<json:string>bruyn</json:string>
<json:string>periapical radiographs</json:string>
<json:string>periodontol</json:string>
<json:string>orthopantomographs</json:string>
<json:string>crestal</json:string>
<json:string>mandible</json:string>
<json:string>clin periodontol</json:string>
<json:string>periodontal</json:string>
<json:string>maxilla</json:string>
<json:string>maxillofac</json:string>
<json:string>tomography</json:string>
<json:string>branemark</json:string>
<json:string>oral maxillofac implants</json:string>
<json:string>grondahl</json:string>
<json:string>clin implant dent relat</json:string>
<json:string>relat</json:string>
<json:string>osseointegrated</json:string>
<json:string>bone level</json:string>
<json:string>vandeweghe</json:string>
<json:string>collaert</json:string>
<json:string>dental implants</json:string>
<json:string>crestal bone loss</json:string>
<json:string>retrospective</json:string>
<json:string>oral implants</json:string>
<json:string>prosthetic</json:string>
<json:string>periodontology</json:string>
<json:string>radiographic evaluation</json:string>
<json:string>velde</json:string>
<json:string>prospective study</json:string>
<json:string>radiol</json:string>
<json:string>cosyn</json:string>
<json:string>abutment</json:string>
<json:string>cone beam</json:string>
<json:string>osseointegrated implants</json:string>
<json:string>baseline</json:string>
<json:string>radiography</json:string>
<json:string>edentulous</json:string>
<json:string>readability</json:string>
<json:string>albrektsson</json:string>
<json:string>anterior maxilla</json:string>
<json:string>other hand</json:string>
<json:string>dentomaxillofac radiol</json:string>
<json:string>dent</json:string>
<json:string>retrospective study</json:string>
<json:string>retrospective studies</json:string>
<json:string>radiographic assessment</json:string>
<json:string>panoramic</json:string>
<json:string>small changes</json:string>
<json:string>prosthet dent</json:string>
<json:string>edentulous patients</json:string>
<json:string>radiographic diagnosis</json:string>
<json:string>survival rate</json:string>
<json:string>branemark implants</json:string>
<json:string>implant dentistry</json:string>
<json:string>daily practice</json:string>
<json:string>prospective studies</json:string>
<json:string>technical complications</json:string>
<json:string>unreadable radiographs</json:string>
<json:string>radiographic imaging</json:string>
<json:string>clinical parameters</json:string>
<json:string>marginal bone loss</json:string>
<json:string>intraoral radiographs</json:string>
<json:string>bone levels</json:string>
<json:string>marginal bone level</json:string>
<json:string>modern implant surfaces</json:string>
<json:string>crestal bone</json:string>
<json:string>oral surg</json:string>
<json:string>true bone loss</json:string>
<json:string>radiographic evaluations</json:string>
<json:string>edentulous jaws</json:string>
<json:string>implant failure</json:string>
<json:string>single implants</json:string>
<json:string>longitudinal study</json:string>
<json:string>panoramic radiography</json:string>
<json:string>oral implantol</json:string>
<json:string>multiple implants</json:string>
<json:string>statistical unit</json:string>
<json:string>initial bone</json:string>
<json:string>implant placement</json:string>
<json:string>case series</json:string>
<json:string>clinical outcome</json:string>
<json:string>risk indicators</json:string>
<json:string>edentulous mandible</json:string>
<json:string>oral pathol</json:string>
<json:string>defect</json:string>
<json:string>bone</json:string>
</teeft>
</keywords>
<author>
<json:item>
<name>Hugo De Bruyn</name>
</json:item>
<json:item>
<name>Stefan Vandeweghe</name>
</json:item>
<json:item>
<name>Christian Ruyffelaert</name>
</json:item>
<json:item>
<name>Jan Cosyn</name>
</json:item>
<json:item>
<name>Lars Sennerby</name>
</json:item>
</author>
<articleId>
<json:string>PRD12004</json:string>
</articleId>
<arkIstex>ark:/67375/WNG-G1PFWCSW-6</arkIstex>
<language>
<json:string>eng</json:string>
</language>
<originalGenre>
<json:string>article</json:string>
</originalGenre>
<abstract>Implant stability and maintenance of stable crestal bone level are prerequisites for the successful long‐term function of oral implants, and continuous crestal bone loss constitutes a threat to the longevity of implant–supported prosthetic constructions. The prevalence/incidence and reasons for crestal bone loss are under debate. Some authors regard infection (i.e. peri‐implantitis) as the cause for virtually all bone loss, while others see crestal bone loss as an unavoidable phenomenon following surgery and implant loading. Irrespective of the cause of continuous crestal bone loss, correct usage and scientifically sound interpretation of radiographs are of utmost importance for evaluation of oral implants. The periapical radiographic technique is currently the preferred method for evaluating implant health based on bone loss, and digital radiographs allow easy standardization of the image contrast. It is suggested that baseline radiographs should be taken at the time the transmucosal part pierces the mucosal tissues and annually thereafter. The number of unreadable radiographs should be presented in scientific publications to give insights into the quality of the radiographic examination. It is suggested that not only mean values, but also the range of bone levels, should be presented to describe the proportion of implants that show continuous crestal bone loss. In the absence of other clinical symptoms, bleeding on probing around implants seems to be a weak indicator of ongoing or future loss of crestal bone. According to recent longitudinal studies on modern implant surfaces peri‐implantitis defined as ‘infection with suppuration associated with clinically significant progressing crestal bone loss’ occurs with a prevalence of less than 5 % in implants with 10 years in function.</abstract>
<qualityIndicators>
<score>10</score>
<pdfWordCount>9202</pdfWordCount>
<pdfCharCount>58853</pdfCharCount>
<pdfVersion>1.3</pdfVersion>
<pdfPageCount>15</pdfPageCount>
<pdfPageSize>595.276 x 782.362 pts</pdfPageSize>
<refBibsNative>true</refBibsNative>
<abstractWordCount>264</abstractWordCount>
<abstractCharCount>1811</abstractCharCount>
<keywordCount>0</keywordCount>
</qualityIndicators>
<title>Radiographic evaluation of modern oral implants with emphasis on crestal bone level and relevance to peri‐implant health</title>
<pmid>
<json:string>23574471</json:string>
</pmid>
<genre>
<json:string>article</json:string>
</genre>
<host>
<title>Periodontology 2000</title>
<language>
<json:string>unknown</json:string>
</language>
<doi>
<json:string>10.1111/(ISSN)1600-0757</json:string>
</doi>
<issn>
<json:string>0906-6713</json:string>
</issn>
<eissn>
<json:string>1600-0757</json:string>
</eissn>
<publisherId>
<json:string>PRD</json:string>
</publisherId>
<volume>62</volume>
<issue>1</issue>
<pages>
<first>256</first>
<last>270</last>
<total>15</total>
</pages>
<genre>
<json:string>journal</json:string>
</genre>
</host>
<namedEntities>
<unitex>
<date>
<json:string>1986</json:string>
<json:string>1993</json:string>
<json:string>2013</json:string>
<json:string>1977</json:string>
<json:string>2008</json:string>
<json:string>2169</json:string>
<json:string>1978</json:string>
</date>
<geogName></geogName>
<orgName>
<json:string>Ghent University</json:string>
<json:string>Department of Periodontology and Oral</json:string>
</orgName>
<orgName_funder></orgName_funder>
<orgName_provider></orgName_provider>
<persName>
<json:string>Implantology</json:string>
</persName>
<placeName>
<json:string>Pisa</json:string>
</placeName>
<ref_url></ref_url>
<ref_bibl>
<json:string>Pikner et al.</json:string>
<json:string>Verhoeven et al.</json:string>
<json:string>Browaeys et al.</json:string>
<json:string>Astrand et al.</json:string>
<json:string>Hammerle et al.</json:string>
<json:string>Batenburg et al.</json:string>
<json:string>Cooper et al.</json:string>
<json:string>Branemark et al.</json:string>
<json:string>De Bruyn et al.</json:string>
<json:string>Persson et al.</json:string>
<json:string>Adell et al.</json:string>
<json:string>Vandeweghe et al.</json:string>
<json:string>Albrektsson et al.</json:string>
<json:string>Zechner et al.</json:string>
<json:string>Levy et al.</json:string>
<json:string>Dierens et al.</json:string>
<json:string>Papapanou et al.</json:string>
<json:string>Raes et al.</json:string>
<json:string>Ahlqvist et al.</json:string>
<json:string>Kim et al.</json:string>
<json:string>Sunden et al.</json:string>
<json:string>Molander et al.</json:string>
<json:string>Ericsson et al.</json:string>
</ref_bibl>
<bibl></bibl>
</unitex>
</namedEntities>
<ark>
<json:string>ark:/67375/WNG-G1PFWCSW-6</json:string>
</ark>
<categories>
<wos>
<json:string>1 - science</json:string>
<json:string>2 - dentistry, oral surgery & medicine</json:string>
</wos>
<scienceMetrix>
<json:string>1 - health sciences</json:string>
<json:string>2 - clinical medicine</json:string>
<json:string>3 - dentistry</json:string>
</scienceMetrix>
<scopus>
<json:string>1 - Health Sciences</json:string>
<json:string>2 - Dentistry</json:string>
<json:string>3 - Periodontics</json:string>
</scopus>
<inist>
<json:string>1 - sciences appliquees, technologies et medecines</json:string>
<json:string>2 - sciences biologiques et medicales</json:string>
<json:string>3 - sciences medicales</json:string>
</inist>
</categories>
<publicationDate>2013</publicationDate>
<copyrightDate>2013</copyrightDate>
<doi>
<json:string>10.1111/prd.12004</json:string>
</doi>
<id>DBC652E24D551050E4B7791D1D4A93518B0EDD47</id>
<score>1</score>
<fulltext>
<json:item>
<extension>pdf</extension>
<original>true</original>
<mimetype>application/pdf</mimetype>
<uri>https://api.istex.fr/document/DBC652E24D551050E4B7791D1D4A93518B0EDD47/fulltext/pdf</uri>
</json:item>
<json:item>
<extension>zip</extension>
<original>false</original>
<mimetype>application/zip</mimetype>
<uri>https://api.istex.fr/document/DBC652E24D551050E4B7791D1D4A93518B0EDD47/fulltext/zip</uri>
</json:item>
<istex:fulltextTEI uri="https://api.istex.fr/document/DBC652E24D551050E4B7791D1D4A93518B0EDD47/fulltext/tei">
<teiHeader>
<fileDesc>
<titleStmt>
<title level="a" type="main">Radiographic evaluation of modern oral implants with emphasis on crestal bone level and relevance to peri‐implant health</title>
</titleStmt>
<publicationStmt>
<authority>ISTEX</authority>
<publisher>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</publisher>
<pubPlace>Oxford, UK</pubPlace>
<availability>
<licence>© 2013 John Wiley & Sons A/S</licence>
</availability>
<date type="published" when="2013-06"></date>
</publicationStmt>
<notesStmt>
<note type="content-type" subtype="article" source="article" scheme="https://content-type.data.istex.fr/ark:/67375/XTP-6N5SZHKN-D">article</note>
<note type="publication-type" subtype="journal" scheme="https://publication-type.data.istex.fr/ark:/67375/JMC-0GLKJH51-B">journal</note>
</notesStmt>
<sourceDesc>
<biblStruct type="article">
<analytic>
<title level="a" type="main">Radiographic evaluation of modern oral implants with emphasis on crestal bone level and relevance to peri‐implant health</title>
<title level="a" type="short">Radiographic evaluation of oral implants</title>
<author xml:id="author-0000">
<persName>
<forename type="first">Hugo</forename>
<surname>De Bruyn</surname>
</persName>
</author>
<author xml:id="author-0001">
<persName>
<forename type="first">Stefan</forename>
<surname>Vandeweghe</surname>
</persName>
</author>
<author xml:id="author-0002">
<persName>
<forename type="first">Christian</forename>
<surname>Ruyffelaert</surname>
</persName>
</author>
<author xml:id="author-0003">
<persName>
<forename type="first">Jan</forename>
<surname>Cosyn</surname>
</persName>
</author>
<author xml:id="author-0004">
<persName>
<forename type="first">Lars</forename>
<surname>Sennerby</surname>
</persName>
</author>
<idno type="istex">DBC652E24D551050E4B7791D1D4A93518B0EDD47</idno>
<idno type="ark">ark:/67375/WNG-G1PFWCSW-6</idno>
<idno type="DOI">10.1111/prd.12004</idno>
<idno type="unit">PRD12004</idno>
<idno type="toTypesetVersion">file:PRD.PRD12004.pdf</idno>
</analytic>
<monogr>
<title level="j" type="main">Periodontology 2000</title>
<title level="j" type="alt">PERIODONTOLOGY 2000</title>
<idno type="pISSN">0906-6713</idno>
<idno type="eISSN">1600-0757</idno>
<idno type="book-DOI">10.1111/(ISSN)1600-0757</idno>
<idno type="book-part-DOI">10.1111/prd.2013.62.issue-1</idno>
<idno type="product">PRD</idno>
<idno type="publisherDivision">ST</idno>
<imprint>
<biblScope unit="vol">62</biblScope>
<biblScope unit="issue">1</biblScope>
<biblScope unit="page" from="256">256</biblScope>
<biblScope unit="page" to="270">270</biblScope>
<biblScope unit="page-count">15</biblScope>
<publisher>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</publisher>
<pubPlace>Oxford, UK</pubPlace>
<date type="published" when="2013-06"></date>
</imprint>
</monogr>
</biblStruct>
</sourceDesc>
</fileDesc>
<profileDesc>
<abstract xml:lang="en" style="main">
<head>Abstract</head>
<p>Implant stability and maintenance of stable crestal bone level are prerequisites for the successful long‐term function of oral implants, and continuous crestal bone loss constitutes a threat to the longevity of implant–supported prosthetic constructions. The prevalence/incidence and reasons for crestal bone loss are under debate. Some authors regard infection (i.e. peri‐implantitis) as the cause for virtually all bone loss, while others see crestal bone loss as an unavoidable phenomenon following surgery and implant loading. Irrespective of the cause of continuous crestal bone loss, correct usage and scientifically sound interpretation of radiographs are of utmost importance for evaluation of oral implants. The periapical radiographic technique is currently the preferred method for evaluating implant health based on bone loss, and digital radiographs allow easy standardization of the image contrast. It is suggested that baseline radiographs should be taken at the time the transmucosal part pierces the mucosal tissues and annually thereafter. The number of unreadable radiographs should be presented in scientific publications to give insights into the quality of the radiographic examination. It is suggested that not only mean values, but also the range of bone levels, should be presented to describe the proportion of implants that show continuous crestal bone loss. In the absence of other clinical symptoms, bleeding on probing around implants seems to be a weak indicator of ongoing or future loss of crestal bone. According to recent longitudinal studies on modern implant surfaces peri‐implantitis defined as ‘infection with suppuration associated with clinically significant progressing crestal bone loss’ occurs with a prevalence of less than 5 % in implants with 10 years in function.</p>
</abstract>
<textClass>
<keywords rend="tocHeading1">
<term>Original Articles</term>
</keywords>
</textClass>
<langUsage>
<language ident="en"></language>
</langUsage>
</profileDesc>
</teiHeader>
</istex:fulltextTEI>
<json:item>
<extension>txt</extension>
<original>false</original>
<mimetype>text/plain</mimetype>
<uri>https://api.istex.fr/document/DBC652E24D551050E4B7791D1D4A93518B0EDD47/fulltext/txt</uri>
</json:item>
</fulltext>
<metadata>
<istex:metadataXml wicri:clean="Wiley, elements deleted: body">
<istex:xmlDeclaration>version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" standalone="yes"</istex:xmlDeclaration>
<istex:document>
<component version="2.0" type="serialArticle" xml:lang="en">
<header>
<publicationMeta level="product">
<publisherInfo>
<publisherName>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</publisherName>
<publisherLoc>Oxford, UK</publisherLoc>
</publisherInfo>
<doi origin="wiley" registered="yes">10.1111/(ISSN)1600-0757</doi>
<issn type="print">0906-6713</issn>
<issn type="electronic">1600-0757</issn>
<idGroup>
<id type="product" value="PRD"></id>
<id type="publisherDivision" value="ST"></id>
</idGroup>
<titleGroup>
<title type="main" sort="PERIODONTOLOGY 2000">Periodontology 2000</title>
</titleGroup>
</publicationMeta>
<publicationMeta level="part" position="06101">
<doi origin="wiley">10.1111/prd.2013.62.issue-1</doi>
<numberingGroup>
<numbering type="journalVolume" number="62">62</numbering>
<numbering type="journalIssue" number="1">1</numbering>
</numberingGroup>
<coverDate startDate="2013-06">June 2013</coverDate>
</publicationMeta>
<publicationMeta level="unit" type="article" position="11" status="forIssue">
<doi origin="wiley">10.1111/prd.12004</doi>
<idGroup>
<id type="unit" value="PRD12004"></id>
</idGroup>
<countGroup>
<count type="pageTotal" number="15"></count>
</countGroup>
<titleGroup>
<title type="tocHeading1">Original Articles</title>
</titleGroup>
<copyright>© 2013 John Wiley & Sons A/S</copyright>
<eventGroup>
<event type="xmlConverted" agent="Converter:BPG_TO_WML3G version:3.2.0 mode:FullText" date="2013-04-10"></event>
<event agent="SPS" date="2013-04-10" type="xmlCorrected"></event>
<event type="firstOnline" date="2013-04-11"></event>
<event type="publishedOnlineFinalForm" date="2013-04-11"></event>
<event type="xmlConverted" agent="Converter:WILEY_ML3G_TO_WILEY_ML3GV2 version:3.8.8" date="2014-02-07"></event>
<event type="xmlConverted" agent="Converter:WML3G_To_WML3G version:4.6.4 mode:FullText" date="2015-10-03"></event>
</eventGroup>
<numberingGroup>
<numbering type="pageFirst" number="256">256</numbering>
<numbering type="pageLast" number="270">270</numbering>
</numberingGroup>
<linkGroup>
<link type="toTypesetVersion" href="file:PRD.PRD12004.pdf"></link>
</linkGroup>
</publicationMeta>
<contentMeta>
<countGroup>
<count type="figureTotal" number="5"></count>
<count type="tableTotal" number="1"></count>
</countGroup>
<titleGroup>
<title type="main">Radiographic evaluation of modern oral implants with emphasis on crestal bone level and relevance to peri‐implant health</title>
<title type="shortAuthors">
<i>De Bruyn</i>
et al.</title>
<title type="short">
<i>Radiographic evaluation of oral implants</i>
</title>
</titleGroup>
<creators>
<creator creatorRole="author" xml:id="cr1">
<personName>
<givenNames>Hugo</givenNames>
<familyName>De Bruyn</familyName>
</personName>
</creator>
<creator creatorRole="author" xml:id="cr2">
<personName>
<givenNames>Stefan</givenNames>
<familyName>Vandeweghe</familyName>
</personName>
</creator>
<creator creatorRole="author" xml:id="cr3">
<personName>
<givenNames>Christian</givenNames>
<familyName>Ruyffelaert</familyName>
</personName>
</creator>
<creator creatorRole="author" xml:id="cr4">
<personName>
<givenNames>Jan</givenNames>
<familyName>Cosyn</familyName>
</personName>
</creator>
<creator creatorRole="author" xml:id="cr5">
<personName>
<givenNames>Lars</givenNames>
<familyName>Sennerby</familyName>
</personName>
</creator>
</creators>
<abstractGroup>
<abstract type="main" xml:lang="en">
<title type="main">Abstract</title>
<p>Implant stability and maintenance of stable crestal bone level are prerequisites for the successful long‐term function of oral implants, and continuous crestal bone loss constitutes a threat to the longevity of implant–supported prosthetic constructions. The prevalence/incidence and reasons for crestal bone loss are under debate. Some authors regard infection (i.e. peri‐implantitis) as the cause for virtually all bone loss, while others see crestal bone loss as an unavoidable phenomenon following surgery and implant loading. Irrespective of the cause of continuous crestal bone loss, correct usage and scientifically sound interpretation of radiographs are of utmost importance for evaluation of oral implants. The periapical radiographic technique is currently the preferred method for evaluating implant health based on bone loss, and digital radiographs allow easy standardization of the image contrast. It is suggested that baseline radiographs should be taken at the time the transmucosal part pierces the mucosal tissues and annually thereafter. The number of unreadable radiographs should be presented in scientific publications to give insights into the quality of the radiographic examination. It is suggested that not only mean values, but also the range of bone levels, should be presented to describe the proportion of implants that show continuous crestal bone loss. In the absence of other clinical symptoms, bleeding on probing around implants seems to be a weak indicator of ongoing or future loss of crestal bone. According to recent longitudinal studies on modern implant surfaces peri‐implantitis defined as ‘infection with suppuration associated with clinically significant progressing crestal bone loss’ occurs with a prevalence of less than 5 % in implants with 10 years in function.</p>
</abstract>
</abstractGroup>
</contentMeta>
</header>
</component>
</istex:document>
</istex:metadataXml>
<mods version="3.6">
<titleInfo lang="en">
<title>Radiographic evaluation of modern oral implants with emphasis on crestal bone level and relevance to peri‐implant health</title>
</titleInfo>
<titleInfo type="abbreviated" lang="en">
<title>Radiographic evaluation of oral implants</title>
</titleInfo>
<titleInfo type="alternative" contentType="CDATA" lang="en">
<title>Radiographic evaluation of modern oral implants with emphasis on crestal bone level and relevance to peri‐implant health</title>
</titleInfo>
<name type="personal">
<namePart type="given">Hugo</namePart>
<namePart type="family">De Bruyn</namePart>
<role>
<roleTerm type="text">author</roleTerm>
</role>
</name>
<name type="personal">
<namePart type="given">Stefan</namePart>
<namePart type="family">Vandeweghe</namePart>
<role>
<roleTerm type="text">author</roleTerm>
</role>
</name>
<name type="personal">
<namePart type="given">Christian</namePart>
<namePart type="family">Ruyffelaert</namePart>
<role>
<roleTerm type="text">author</roleTerm>
</role>
</name>
<name type="personal">
<namePart type="given">Jan</namePart>
<namePart type="family">Cosyn</namePart>
<role>
<roleTerm type="text">author</roleTerm>
</role>
</name>
<name type="personal">
<namePart type="given">Lars</namePart>
<namePart type="family">Sennerby</namePart>
<role>
<roleTerm type="text">author</roleTerm>
</role>
</name>
<typeOfResource>text</typeOfResource>
<genre type="article" displayLabel="article" authority="ISTEX" authorityURI="https://content-type.data.istex.fr" valueURI="https://content-type.data.istex.fr/ark:/67375/XTP-6N5SZHKN-D">article</genre>
<originInfo>
<publisher>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</publisher>
<place>
<placeTerm type="text">Oxford, UK</placeTerm>
</place>
<dateIssued encoding="w3cdtf">2013-06</dateIssued>
<copyrightDate encoding="w3cdtf">2013</copyrightDate>
</originInfo>
<language>
<languageTerm type="code" authority="rfc3066">en</languageTerm>
<languageTerm type="code" authority="iso639-2b">eng</languageTerm>
</language>
<physicalDescription>
<extent unit="figures">5</extent>
<extent unit="tables">1</extent>
</physicalDescription>
<abstract lang="en">Implant stability and maintenance of stable crestal bone level are prerequisites for the successful long‐term function of oral implants, and continuous crestal bone loss constitutes a threat to the longevity of implant–supported prosthetic constructions. The prevalence/incidence and reasons for crestal bone loss are under debate. Some authors regard infection (i.e. peri‐implantitis) as the cause for virtually all bone loss, while others see crestal bone loss as an unavoidable phenomenon following surgery and implant loading. Irrespective of the cause of continuous crestal bone loss, correct usage and scientifically sound interpretation of radiographs are of utmost importance for evaluation of oral implants. The periapical radiographic technique is currently the preferred method for evaluating implant health based on bone loss, and digital radiographs allow easy standardization of the image contrast. It is suggested that baseline radiographs should be taken at the time the transmucosal part pierces the mucosal tissues and annually thereafter. The number of unreadable radiographs should be presented in scientific publications to give insights into the quality of the radiographic examination. It is suggested that not only mean values, but also the range of bone levels, should be presented to describe the proportion of implants that show continuous crestal bone loss. In the absence of other clinical symptoms, bleeding on probing around implants seems to be a weak indicator of ongoing or future loss of crestal bone. According to recent longitudinal studies on modern implant surfaces peri‐implantitis defined as ‘infection with suppuration associated with clinically significant progressing crestal bone loss’ occurs with a prevalence of less than 5 % in implants with 10 years in function.</abstract>
<relatedItem type="host">
<titleInfo>
<title>Periodontology 2000</title>
</titleInfo>
<genre type="journal" authority="ISTEX" authorityURI="https://publication-type.data.istex.fr" valueURI="https://publication-type.data.istex.fr/ark:/67375/JMC-0GLKJH51-B">journal</genre>
<identifier type="ISSN">0906-6713</identifier>
<identifier type="eISSN">1600-0757</identifier>
<identifier type="DOI">10.1111/(ISSN)1600-0757</identifier>
<identifier type="PublisherID">PRD</identifier>
<part>
<date>2013</date>
<detail type="volume">
<caption>vol.</caption>
<number>62</number>
</detail>
<detail type="issue">
<caption>no.</caption>
<number>1</number>
</detail>
<extent unit="pages">
<start>256</start>
<end>270</end>
<total>15</total>
</extent>
</part>
</relatedItem>
<identifier type="istex">DBC652E24D551050E4B7791D1D4A93518B0EDD47</identifier>
<identifier type="ark">ark:/67375/WNG-G1PFWCSW-6</identifier>
<identifier type="DOI">10.1111/prd.12004</identifier>
<identifier type="ArticleID">PRD12004</identifier>
<accessCondition type="use and reproduction" contentType="copyright">© 2013 John Wiley & Sons A/S</accessCondition>
<recordInfo>
<recordContentSource authority="ISTEX" authorityURI="https://loaded-corpus.data.istex.fr" valueURI="https://loaded-corpus.data.istex.fr/ark:/67375/XBH-L0C46X92-X">wiley</recordContentSource>
<recordOrigin>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</recordOrigin>
</recordInfo>
</mods>
<json:item>
<extension>json</extension>
<original>false</original>
<mimetype>application/json</mimetype>
<uri>https://api.istex.fr/document/DBC652E24D551050E4B7791D1D4A93518B0EDD47/metadata/json</uri>
</json:item>
</metadata>
<serie></serie>
</istex>
</record>

Pour manipuler ce document sous Unix (Dilib)

EXPLOR_STEP=$WICRI_ROOT/Wicri/Santé/explor/EdenteV2/Data/Istex/Corpus
HfdSelect -h $EXPLOR_STEP/biblio.hfd -nk 006D07 | SxmlIndent | more

Ou

HfdSelect -h $EXPLOR_AREA/Data/Istex/Corpus/biblio.hfd -nk 006D07 | SxmlIndent | more

Pour mettre un lien sur cette page dans le réseau Wicri

{{Explor lien
   |wiki=    Wicri/Santé
   |area=    EdenteV2
   |flux=    Istex
   |étape=   Corpus
   |type=    RBID
   |clé=     ISTEX:DBC652E24D551050E4B7791D1D4A93518B0EDD47
   |texte=   Radiographic evaluation of modern oral implants with emphasis on crestal bone level and relevance to peri‐implant health
}}

Wicri

This area was generated with Dilib version V0.6.32.
Data generation: Thu Nov 30 15:26:48 2017. Site generation: Tue Mar 8 16:36:20 2022