Masseter muscle thickness, chewing efficiency and bite force in edentulous patients with fixed and removable implant‐supported prostheses: a cross‐sectional multicenter study
Identifieur interne : 006D03 ( Istex/Corpus ); précédent : 006D02; suivant : 006D04Masseter muscle thickness, chewing efficiency and bite force in edentulous patients with fixed and removable implant‐supported prostheses: a cross‐sectional multicenter study
Auteurs : Frauke Müller ; Marta Hernandez ; Linda Grütter ; Luis Aracil-Kessler ; Dieter Weingart ; Martin SchimmelSource :
- Clinical Oral Implants Research [ 0905-7161 ] ; 2012-02.
English descriptors
- KwdEn :
- Ability test, Azure colour, Bimaxillary, Bimaxillary ifdp, Bimaxillary ifdps, Carlsson lindquist, Clin, Complete denture wearers, Complete dentures, Crosssectional multicenter study, Current study, Dental implants, Dental prostheses, Dental research, Dentate, Dentate participants, Dentate subjects, Denture, Denture base, Denture wearers, Edentulous, Edentulous mandible, Edentulous patients, Exact test, Feine, Force gauge, Fracture, Fracture experience, Hypothetical sample size calculation, Ifdp, Impl, Implant, Implants research, Implantsupported restorations, International journal, John wiley sons, John wiley sons muller, Kiliaridis, Kiliaridis kalebo, Logarithmic function, Lower denture, Mandibular, Mandibular overdentures, Mandibular prostheses, Martin schimmel, Masseter, Masseter muscle, Masseter muscle thickness, Masticatory, Masticatory function, Masticatory muscles, Masticatory performance, Motor control, Multicenter study, Multiple comparisons, Muscle condition, Natural dentition, Natural roots, Occlusal, Older people, Oral biology, Oral function, Oral impl, Oral implants, Oral maxillofacial implants, Oral rehabilitation, Osseointegrated implants, Other groups, Overdentures, Participant, Positive effects, Present study, Prosthesis, Prosthetic superstructure, Prosthodontics, Radiographic density, Removable, Removable prostheses, Removable prosthodontics, Sample size, Schimmel, Soft diet, Standard deviation, Statistical analysis, Straumann implants, Study participants, Thickest part, University hospitals, Veneering material, Wearer.
- Teeft :
- Ability test, Azure colour, Bimaxillary, Bimaxillary ifdp, Bimaxillary ifdps, Carlsson lindquist, Clin, Complete denture wearers, Complete dentures, Crosssectional multicenter study, Current study, Dental implants, Dental prostheses, Dental research, Dentate, Dentate participants, Dentate subjects, Denture, Denture base, Denture wearers, Edentulous, Edentulous mandible, Edentulous patients, Exact test, Feine, Force gauge, Fracture, Fracture experience, Hypothetical sample size calculation, Ifdp, Impl, Implant, Implants research, Implantsupported restorations, International journal, John wiley sons, John wiley sons muller, Kiliaridis, Kiliaridis kalebo, Logarithmic function, Lower denture, Mandibular, Mandibular overdentures, Mandibular prostheses, Martin schimmel, Masseter, Masseter muscle, Masseter muscle thickness, Masticatory, Masticatory function, Masticatory muscles, Masticatory performance, Motor control, Multicenter study, Multiple comparisons, Muscle condition, Natural dentition, Natural roots, Occlusal, Older people, Oral biology, Oral function, Oral impl, Oral implants, Oral maxillofacial implants, Oral rehabilitation, Osseointegrated implants, Other groups, Overdentures, Participant, Positive effects, Present study, Prosthesis, Prosthetic superstructure, Prosthodontics, Radiographic density, Removable, Removable prostheses, Removable prosthodontics, Sample size, Schimmel, Soft diet, Standard deviation, Statistical analysis, Straumann implants, Study participants, Thickest part, University hospitals, Veneering material, Wearer.
Abstract
Objectives: Edentulous patients may be restored with conventional dentures (C/C), implant‐supported overdentures (IOD) or implant‐supported fixed dental prostheses (IFDP). Null‐hypotheses: chewing efficiency, maximum voluntary bite force (MBF) and masseter muscle thickness (MMT) are lower in patients with C/IOD compared with the patients with bimaxillary IFDPs. Both groups perform better than C/C and are inferior to fully dentate controls.
Url:
DOI: 10.1111/j.1600-0501.2011.02213.x
Links to Exploration step
ISTEX:DBABC09E425BE008D9C931285CA92791CACBC173Le document en format XML
<record><TEI wicri:istexFullTextTei="biblStruct"><teiHeader><fileDesc><titleStmt><title xml:lang="en">Masseter muscle thickness, chewing efficiency and bite force in edentulous patients with fixed and removable implant‐supported prostheses: a cross‐sectional multicenter study</title><author><name sortKey="Muller, Frauke" sort="Muller, Frauke" uniqKey="Muller F" first="Frauke" last="Müller">Frauke Müller</name><affiliation><mods:affiliation>Division of Gerodontology and Removable Prosthodontics, University of Geneva, Geneva, Switzerland</mods:affiliation></affiliation><affiliation><mods:affiliation>Department of Rehabilitation and Geriatrics, University Hospitals of Geneva, Thonex, Switzerland</mods:affiliation></affiliation></author><author><name sortKey="Hernandez, Marta" sort="Hernandez, Marta" uniqKey="Hernandez M" first="Marta" last="Hernandez">Marta Hernandez</name><affiliation><mods:affiliation>Department of Periodontology, Oral Surgery, Oral Medicine, University Complutense Madrid, Madrid, Spain</mods:affiliation></affiliation><affiliation><mods:affiliation>Department of Maxillofacial Surgery, Plastic Surgery and Centre of Oral Implantology, Katharinen Hospital, Stuttgart, Germany</mods:affiliation></affiliation></author><author><name sortKey="Grutter, Linda" sort="Grutter, Linda" uniqKey="Grutter L" first="Linda" last="Grütter">Linda Grütter</name><affiliation><mods:affiliation>Division of Fixed Prosthodontics and Occlusion, University of Geneva, Geneva, Switzerland</mods:affiliation></affiliation></author><author><name sortKey="Aracil Essler, Luis" sort="Aracil Essler, Luis" uniqKey="Aracil Essler L" first="Luis" last="Aracil-Kessler">Luis Aracil-Kessler</name><affiliation><mods:affiliation>Department of Periodontology, Oral Surgery, Oral Medicine, University Complutense Madrid, Madrid, Spain</mods:affiliation></affiliation></author><author><name sortKey="Weingart, Dieter" sort="Weingart, Dieter" uniqKey="Weingart D" first="Dieter" last="Weingart">Dieter Weingart</name><affiliation><mods:affiliation>Department of Maxillofacial Surgery, Plastic Surgery and Centre of Oral Implantology, Katharinen Hospital, Stuttgart, Germany</mods:affiliation></affiliation></author><author><name sortKey="Schimmel, Martin" sort="Schimmel, Martin" uniqKey="Schimmel M" first="Martin" last="Schimmel">Martin Schimmel</name><affiliation><mods:affiliation>Division of Gerodontology and Removable Prosthodontics, University of Geneva, Geneva, Switzerland</mods:affiliation></affiliation></author></titleStmt><publicationStmt><idno type="wicri:source">ISTEX</idno><idno type="RBID">ISTEX:DBABC09E425BE008D9C931285CA92791CACBC173</idno><date when="2012" year="2012">2012</date><idno type="doi">10.1111/j.1600-0501.2011.02213.x</idno><idno type="url">https://api.istex.fr/document/DBABC09E425BE008D9C931285CA92791CACBC173/fulltext/pdf</idno><idno type="wicri:Area/Istex/Corpus">006D03</idno><idno type="wicri:explorRef" wicri:stream="Istex" wicri:step="Corpus" wicri:corpus="ISTEX">006D03</idno></publicationStmt><sourceDesc><biblStruct><analytic><title level="a" type="main">Masseter muscle thickness, chewing efficiency and bite force in edentulous patients with fixed and removable implant‐supported prostheses: a cross‐sectional multicenter study</title><author><name sortKey="Muller, Frauke" sort="Muller, Frauke" uniqKey="Muller F" first="Frauke" last="Müller">Frauke Müller</name><affiliation><mods:affiliation>Division of Gerodontology and Removable Prosthodontics, University of Geneva, Geneva, Switzerland</mods:affiliation></affiliation><affiliation><mods:affiliation>Department of Rehabilitation and Geriatrics, University Hospitals of Geneva, Thonex, Switzerland</mods:affiliation></affiliation></author><author><name sortKey="Hernandez, Marta" sort="Hernandez, Marta" uniqKey="Hernandez M" first="Marta" last="Hernandez">Marta Hernandez</name><affiliation><mods:affiliation>Department of Periodontology, Oral Surgery, Oral Medicine, University Complutense Madrid, Madrid, Spain</mods:affiliation></affiliation><affiliation><mods:affiliation>Department of Maxillofacial Surgery, Plastic Surgery and Centre of Oral Implantology, Katharinen Hospital, Stuttgart, Germany</mods:affiliation></affiliation></author><author><name sortKey="Grutter, Linda" sort="Grutter, Linda" uniqKey="Grutter L" first="Linda" last="Grütter">Linda Grütter</name><affiliation><mods:affiliation>Division of Fixed Prosthodontics and Occlusion, University of Geneva, Geneva, Switzerland</mods:affiliation></affiliation></author><author><name sortKey="Aracil Essler, Luis" sort="Aracil Essler, Luis" uniqKey="Aracil Essler L" first="Luis" last="Aracil-Kessler">Luis Aracil-Kessler</name><affiliation><mods:affiliation>Department of Periodontology, Oral Surgery, Oral Medicine, University Complutense Madrid, Madrid, Spain</mods:affiliation></affiliation></author><author><name sortKey="Weingart, Dieter" sort="Weingart, Dieter" uniqKey="Weingart D" first="Dieter" last="Weingart">Dieter Weingart</name><affiliation><mods:affiliation>Department of Maxillofacial Surgery, Plastic Surgery and Centre of Oral Implantology, Katharinen Hospital, Stuttgart, Germany</mods:affiliation></affiliation></author><author><name sortKey="Schimmel, Martin" sort="Schimmel, Martin" uniqKey="Schimmel M" first="Martin" last="Schimmel">Martin Schimmel</name><affiliation><mods:affiliation>Division of Gerodontology and Removable Prosthodontics, University of Geneva, Geneva, Switzerland</mods:affiliation></affiliation></author></analytic><monogr></monogr><series><title level="j" type="main">Clinical Oral Implants Research</title><title level="j" type="alt">CLINICAL ORAL IMPLANTS RESEARCH</title><idno type="ISSN">0905-7161</idno><idno type="eISSN">1600-0501</idno><imprint><biblScope unit="vol">23</biblScope><biblScope unit="issue">2</biblScope><biblScope unit="page" from="144">144</biblScope><biblScope unit="page" to="150">150</biblScope><biblScope unit="page-count">7</biblScope><publisher>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</publisher><pubPlace>Oxford, UK</pubPlace><date type="published" when="2012-02">2012-02</date></imprint><idno type="ISSN">0905-7161</idno></series></biblStruct></sourceDesc><seriesStmt><idno type="ISSN">0905-7161</idno></seriesStmt></fileDesc><profileDesc><textClass><keywords scheme="KwdEn" xml:lang="en"><term>Ability test</term><term>Azure colour</term><term>Bimaxillary</term><term>Bimaxillary ifdp</term><term>Bimaxillary ifdps</term><term>Carlsson lindquist</term><term>Clin</term><term>Complete denture wearers</term><term>Complete dentures</term><term>Crosssectional multicenter study</term><term>Current study</term><term>Dental implants</term><term>Dental prostheses</term><term>Dental research</term><term>Dentate</term><term>Dentate participants</term><term>Dentate subjects</term><term>Denture</term><term>Denture base</term><term>Denture wearers</term><term>Edentulous</term><term>Edentulous mandible</term><term>Edentulous patients</term><term>Exact test</term><term>Feine</term><term>Force gauge</term><term>Fracture</term><term>Fracture experience</term><term>Hypothetical sample size calculation</term><term>Ifdp</term><term>Impl</term><term>Implant</term><term>Implants research</term><term>Implantsupported restorations</term><term>International journal</term><term>John wiley sons</term><term>John wiley sons muller</term><term>Kiliaridis</term><term>Kiliaridis kalebo</term><term>Logarithmic function</term><term>Lower denture</term><term>Mandibular</term><term>Mandibular overdentures</term><term>Mandibular prostheses</term><term>Martin schimmel</term><term>Masseter</term><term>Masseter muscle</term><term>Masseter muscle thickness</term><term>Masticatory</term><term>Masticatory function</term><term>Masticatory muscles</term><term>Masticatory performance</term><term>Motor control</term><term>Multicenter study</term><term>Multiple comparisons</term><term>Muscle condition</term><term>Natural dentition</term><term>Natural roots</term><term>Occlusal</term><term>Older people</term><term>Oral biology</term><term>Oral function</term><term>Oral impl</term><term>Oral implants</term><term>Oral maxillofacial implants</term><term>Oral rehabilitation</term><term>Osseointegrated implants</term><term>Other groups</term><term>Overdentures</term><term>Participant</term><term>Positive effects</term><term>Present study</term><term>Prosthesis</term><term>Prosthetic superstructure</term><term>Prosthodontics</term><term>Radiographic density</term><term>Removable</term><term>Removable prostheses</term><term>Removable prosthodontics</term><term>Sample size</term><term>Schimmel</term><term>Soft diet</term><term>Standard deviation</term><term>Statistical analysis</term><term>Straumann implants</term><term>Study participants</term><term>Thickest part</term><term>University hospitals</term><term>Veneering material</term><term>Wearer</term></keywords><keywords scheme="Teeft" xml:lang="en"><term>Ability test</term><term>Azure colour</term><term>Bimaxillary</term><term>Bimaxillary ifdp</term><term>Bimaxillary ifdps</term><term>Carlsson lindquist</term><term>Clin</term><term>Complete denture wearers</term><term>Complete dentures</term><term>Crosssectional multicenter study</term><term>Current study</term><term>Dental implants</term><term>Dental prostheses</term><term>Dental research</term><term>Dentate</term><term>Dentate participants</term><term>Dentate subjects</term><term>Denture</term><term>Denture base</term><term>Denture wearers</term><term>Edentulous</term><term>Edentulous mandible</term><term>Edentulous patients</term><term>Exact test</term><term>Feine</term><term>Force gauge</term><term>Fracture</term><term>Fracture experience</term><term>Hypothetical sample size calculation</term><term>Ifdp</term><term>Impl</term><term>Implant</term><term>Implants research</term><term>Implantsupported restorations</term><term>International journal</term><term>John wiley sons</term><term>John wiley sons muller</term><term>Kiliaridis</term><term>Kiliaridis kalebo</term><term>Logarithmic function</term><term>Lower denture</term><term>Mandibular</term><term>Mandibular overdentures</term><term>Mandibular prostheses</term><term>Martin schimmel</term><term>Masseter</term><term>Masseter muscle</term><term>Masseter muscle thickness</term><term>Masticatory</term><term>Masticatory function</term><term>Masticatory muscles</term><term>Masticatory performance</term><term>Motor control</term><term>Multicenter study</term><term>Multiple comparisons</term><term>Muscle condition</term><term>Natural dentition</term><term>Natural roots</term><term>Occlusal</term><term>Older people</term><term>Oral biology</term><term>Oral function</term><term>Oral impl</term><term>Oral implants</term><term>Oral maxillofacial implants</term><term>Oral rehabilitation</term><term>Osseointegrated implants</term><term>Other groups</term><term>Overdentures</term><term>Participant</term><term>Positive effects</term><term>Present study</term><term>Prosthesis</term><term>Prosthetic superstructure</term><term>Prosthodontics</term><term>Radiographic density</term><term>Removable</term><term>Removable prostheses</term><term>Removable prosthodontics</term><term>Sample size</term><term>Schimmel</term><term>Soft diet</term><term>Standard deviation</term><term>Statistical analysis</term><term>Straumann implants</term><term>Study participants</term><term>Thickest part</term><term>University hospitals</term><term>Veneering material</term><term>Wearer</term></keywords></textClass></profileDesc></teiHeader><front><div type="abstract">Objectives: Edentulous patients may be restored with conventional dentures (C/C), implant‐supported overdentures (IOD) or implant‐supported fixed dental prostheses (IFDP). Null‐hypotheses: chewing efficiency, maximum voluntary bite force (MBF) and masseter muscle thickness (MMT) are lower in patients with C/IOD compared with the patients with bimaxillary IFDPs. Both groups perform better than C/C and are inferior to fully dentate controls.</div></front></TEI><istex><corpusName>wiley</corpusName><keywords><teeft><json:string>denture</json:string><json:string>prosthesis</json:string><json:string>masseter</json:string><json:string>masticatory</json:string><json:string>implant</json:string><json:string>dentate</json:string><json:string>masseter muscle thickness</json:string><json:string>edentulous patients</json:string><json:string>dental prostheses</json:string><json:string>overdentures</json:string><json:string>mandibular</json:string><json:string>schimmel</json:string><json:string>ifdp</json:string><json:string>edentulous</json:string><json:string>current study</json:string><json:string>bimaxillary</json:string><json:string>feine</json:string><json:string>dental research</json:string><json:string>fracture</json:string><json:string>oral impl</json:string><json:string>kiliaridis</json:string><json:string>occlusal</json:string><json:string>clin</json:string><json:string>impl</json:string><json:string>oral rehabilitation</json:string><json:string>masticatory muscles</json:string><json:string>prosthodontics</json:string><json:string>wearer</json:string><json:string>multiple comparisons</json:string><json:string>complete dentures</json:string><json:string>masticatory function</json:string><json:string>masseter muscle</json:string><json:string>international journal</json:string><json:string>lower denture</json:string><json:string>removable</json:string><json:string>denture wearers</json:string><json:string>implants research</json:string><json:string>oral implants</json:string><json:string>denture base</json:string><json:string>standard deviation</json:string><json:string>fracture experience</json:string><json:string>john wiley sons muller</json:string><json:string>masticatory performance</json:string><json:string>removable prostheses</json:string><json:string>sample size</json:string><json:string>multicenter study</json:string><json:string>dentate participants</json:string><json:string>ability test</json:string><json:string>mandibular overdentures</json:string><json:string>muscle condition</json:string><json:string>university hospitals</json:string><json:string>thickest part</json:string><json:string>dental implants</json:string><json:string>kiliaridis kalebo</json:string><json:string>participant</json:string><json:string>edentulous mandible</json:string><json:string>statistical analysis</json:string><json:string>exact test</json:string><json:string>azure colour</json:string><json:string>john wiley sons</json:string><json:string>natural dentition</json:string><json:string>hypothetical sample size calculation</json:string><json:string>dentate subjects</json:string><json:string>martin schimmel</json:string><json:string>straumann implants</json:string><json:string>natural roots</json:string><json:string>other groups</json:string><json:string>complete denture wearers</json:string><json:string>soft diet</json:string><json:string>carlsson lindquist</json:string><json:string>radiographic density</json:string><json:string>study participants</json:string><json:string>logarithmic function</json:string><json:string>positive effects</json:string><json:string>present study</json:string><json:string>bimaxillary ifdp</json:string><json:string>veneering material</json:string><json:string>oral function</json:string><json:string>motor control</json:string><json:string>prosthetic superstructure</json:string><json:string>force gauge</json:string><json:string>older people</json:string><json:string>bimaxillary ifdps</json:string><json:string>oral maxillofacial implants</json:string><json:string>oral biology</json:string><json:string>crosssectional multicenter study</json:string><json:string>mandibular prostheses</json:string><json:string>removable prosthodontics</json:string><json:string>osseointegrated implants</json:string><json:string>implantsupported restorations</json:string></teeft></keywords><author><json:item><name>Frauke Müller</name><affiliations><json:string>Division of Gerodontology and Removable Prosthodontics, University of Geneva, Geneva, Switzerland</json:string><json:string>Department of Rehabilitation and Geriatrics, University Hospitals of Geneva, Thonex, Switzerland</json:string></affiliations></json:item><json:item><name>Marta Hernandez</name><affiliations><json:string>Department of Periodontology, Oral Surgery, Oral Medicine, University Complutense Madrid, Madrid, Spain</json:string><json:string>Department of Maxillofacial Surgery, Plastic Surgery and Centre of Oral Implantology, Katharinen Hospital, Stuttgart, Germany</json:string></affiliations></json:item><json:item><name>Linda Grütter</name><affiliations><json:string>Division of Fixed Prosthodontics and Occlusion, University of Geneva, Geneva, Switzerland</json:string></affiliations></json:item><json:item><name>Luis Aracil‐Kessler</name><affiliations><json:string>Department of Periodontology, Oral Surgery, Oral Medicine, University Complutense Madrid, Madrid, Spain</json:string></affiliations></json:item><json:item><name>Dieter Weingart</name><affiliations><json:string>Department of Maxillofacial Surgery, Plastic Surgery and Centre of Oral Implantology, Katharinen Hospital, Stuttgart, Germany</json:string></affiliations></json:item><json:item><name>Martin Schimmel</name><affiliations><json:string>Division of Gerodontology and Removable Prosthodontics, University of Geneva, Geneva, Switzerland</json:string></affiliations></json:item></author><subject><json:item><lang><json:string>eng</json:string></lang><value>implant‐supported fixed dental prostheses</value></json:item><json:item><lang><json:string>eng</json:string></lang><value>implant‐supported overdenture</value></json:item><json:item><lang><json:string>eng</json:string></lang><value>masseter muscle thickness</value></json:item><json:item><lang><json:string>eng</json:string></lang><value>masticatory efficiency</value></json:item><json:item><lang><json:string>eng</json:string></lang><value>maximum voluntary bite force</value></json:item><json:item><lang><json:string>eng</json:string></lang><value>ultrasound</value></json:item></subject><articleId><json:string>CLR2213</json:string></articleId><arkIstex>ark:/67375/WNG-5T9WPRWX-Q</arkIstex><language><json:string>eng</json:string></language><originalGenre><json:string>article</json:string></originalGenre><abstract>Objectives: Edentulous patients may be restored with conventional dentures (C/C), implant‐supported overdentures (IOD) or implant‐supported fixed dental prostheses (IFDP). Null‐hypotheses: chewing efficiency, maximum voluntary bite force (MBF) and masseter muscle thickness (MMT) are lower in patients with C/IOD compared with the patients with bimaxillary IFDPs. Both groups perform better than C/C and are inferior to fully dentate controls.</abstract><qualityIndicators><score>7.696</score><pdfWordCount>5360</pdfWordCount><pdfCharCount>35288</pdfCharCount><pdfVersion>1.3</pdfVersion><pdfPageCount>7</pdfPageCount><pdfPageSize>595.276 x 782.362 pts</pdfPageSize><refBibsNative>true</refBibsNative><abstractWordCount>58</abstractWordCount><abstractCharCount>443</abstractCharCount><keywordCount>6</keywordCount></qualityIndicators><title>Masseter muscle thickness, chewing efficiency and bite force in edentulous patients with fixed and removable implant‐supported prostheses: a cross‐sectional multicenter study</title><pmid><json:string>21631592</json:string></pmid><genre><json:string>article</json:string></genre><host><title>Clinical Oral Implants Research</title><language><json:string>unknown</json:string></language><doi><json:string>10.1111/(ISSN)1600-0501</json:string></doi><issn><json:string>0905-7161</json:string></issn><eissn><json:string>1600-0501</json:string></eissn><publisherId><json:string>CLR</json:string></publisherId><volume>23</volume><issue>2</issue><pages><first>144</first><last>150</last><total>7</total></pages><genre><json:string>journal</json:string></genre></host><namedEntities><unitex><date><json:string>2012</json:string><json:string>1-30-4</json:string></date><geogName></geogName><orgName><json:string>Switzerland Corresponding</json:string><json:string>University of Geneva, Switzerland</json:string><json:string>Biocare</json:string><json:string>Katharinen Hospital, Stuttgart, Germany Linda Gru</json:string><json:string>The Wrigley Company Ltd, Plymouth</json:string><json:string>Brazzola</json:string><json:string>Division of Fixed Prosthodontics</json:string><json:string>Adobe Systems Inc., San Jose</json:string><json:string>SAS Institute Inc</json:string><json:string>University Hospitals of Geneva, Switzerland</json:string><json:string>Switzerland Frauke Mu</json:string><json:string>Department of Rehabilitation and Geriatrics</json:string><json:string>Division of Gerodontology</json:string><json:string>Geneva Switzerland Tel</json:string><json:string>Nagano Keiki Co.</json:string><json:string>University Hospitals of Geneva</json:string><json:string>Switzerland Marta Hernandez, Luis Aracil-Kessler, Department of Periodontology, Oral Surgery, Oral Medicine, University Complutense Madrid, Madrid, Spain Marta Hernandez, Dieter Weingart, Department of Maxillofacial Surgery, Plastic Surgery and Centre</json:string><json:string>Stata Corporation</json:string><json:string>Removable Prosthodontics University</json:string><json:string>University of Geneva</json:string></orgName><orgName_funder></orgName_funder><orgName_provider></orgName_provider><persName><json:string>Martin Schimmel</json:string><json:string>Manfred Imsand</json:string><json:string>Kamel Salem</json:string><json:string>German Gallucci</json:string><json:string>John Wiley</json:string><json:string>Kendall Meditec</json:string><json:string>Urs Belser</json:string><json:string>Francois</json:string><json:string>The</json:string><json:string>Med Dent</json:string><json:string>Stavros Kiliaridis</json:string><json:string>Dr JeanPierre</json:string><json:string>Prosthodontics</json:string></persName><placeName><json:string>TX</json:string><json:string>Maastricht</json:string><json:string>Geneva</json:string><json:string>College Station</json:string><json:string>Switzerland</json:string><json:string>Germany</json:string><json:string>Sion</json:string><json:string>USA</json:string><json:string>Japan</json:string><json:string>Morges</json:string><json:string>Gothenburg</json:string><json:string>Basel</json:string><json:string>Tokyo</json:string><json:string>Lausanne</json:string><json:string>Italy</json:string><json:string>Sweden</json:string><json:string>Netherlands</json:string></placeName><ref_url></ref_url><ref_bibl><json:string>Emami et al. 2009</json:string><json:string>Botteron et al. 2009</json:string><json:string>Benzig et al. 1994</json:string><json:string>Siegel & Castellan 1988</json:string><json:string>Millwood & Heath 2000</json:string><json:string>Ikebe et al. 2010</json:string><json:string>Newton et al. 1993</json:string><json:string>Proschel et al. 2008</json:string><json:string>Schimmel et al. 2007</json:string><json:string>Haraldson (1983)</json:string><json:string>Feine et al. 1994b</json:string><json:string>Gartner et al. 2000</json:string><json:string>Brennan et al. 2010</json:string><json:string>Thomason et al. 2009</json:string><json:string>Trulsson & Gunne 1998</json:string><json:string>Urushiyama et al. 2004</json:string><json:string>Feine et al. 1994a</json:string><json:string>Schimmel et al. (2010)</json:string><json:string>Heckmann et al. 2009</json:string><json:string>Klineberg et al. 2005</json:string><json:string>Ringqvist 1974</json:string><json:string>Luraschi 2009</json:string><json:string>Nakatsuka et al. 2006</json:string><json:string>van der Bilt et al. 2010b</json:string><json:string>Newton et al. (2004)</json:string><json:string>Muller et al. 1995</json:string><json:string>Lambert et al. 2009</json:string><json:string>Schimmel et al. 2010</json:string><json:string>Larsson 1995</json:string><json:string>Monemi et al. 1998</json:string><json:string>van der Bilt et al. 2010a</json:string><json:string>Carlsson & Lindquist 1994</json:string><json:string>Thomas 1997</json:string><json:string>Ferrario et al. 2004</json:string><json:string>Raustia et al. 1996</json:string><json:string>Rashid et al. 2011</json:string><json:string>Behneke 1994</json:string><json:string>Schimmel et al. 2007, 2011</json:string><json:string>Abarca et al. 2006</json:string><json:string>Bourdiol & Mioche 2000</json:string><json:string>Muller et al</json:string><json:string>Anastassiadou & Heath 2001</json:string></ref_bibl><bibl></bibl></unitex></namedEntities><ark><json:string>ark:/67375/WNG-5T9WPRWX-Q</json:string></ark><categories><wos><json:string>1 - science</json:string><json:string>2 - engineering, biomedical</json:string><json:string>2 - dentistry, oral surgery & medicine</json:string></wos><scienceMetrix><json:string>1 - health sciences</json:string><json:string>2 - clinical medicine</json:string><json:string>3 - dentistry</json:string></scienceMetrix><scopus><json:string>1 - Health Sciences</json:string><json:string>2 - Dentistry</json:string><json:string>3 - Oral Surgery</json:string></scopus></categories><publicationDate>2012</publicationDate><copyrightDate>2012</copyrightDate><doi><json:string>10.1111/j.1600-0501.2011.02213.x</json:string></doi><id>DBABC09E425BE008D9C931285CA92791CACBC173</id><score>1</score><fulltext><json:item><extension>pdf</extension><original>true</original><mimetype>application/pdf</mimetype><uri>https://api.istex.fr/document/DBABC09E425BE008D9C931285CA92791CACBC173/fulltext/pdf</uri></json:item><json:item><extension>zip</extension><original>false</original><mimetype>application/zip</mimetype><uri>https://api.istex.fr/document/DBABC09E425BE008D9C931285CA92791CACBC173/fulltext/zip</uri></json:item><istex:fulltextTEI uri="https://api.istex.fr/document/DBABC09E425BE008D9C931285CA92791CACBC173/fulltext/tei"><teiHeader><fileDesc><titleStmt><title level="a" type="main">Masseter muscle thickness, chewing efficiency and bite force in edentulous patients with fixed and removable implant‐supported prostheses: a cross‐sectional multicenter study</title></titleStmt><publicationStmt><authority>ISTEX</authority><publisher>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</publisher><pubPlace>Oxford, UK</pubPlace><availability><licence>© 2011 John Wiley & Sons A/S</licence></availability><date type="published" when="2012-02"></date></publicationStmt><notesStmt><note type="content-type" subtype="article" source="article" scheme="https://content-type.data.istex.fr/ark:/67375/XTP-6N5SZHKN-D">article</note><note type="publication-type" subtype="journal" scheme="https://publication-type.data.istex.fr/ark:/67375/JMC-0GLKJH51-B">journal</note></notesStmt><sourceDesc><biblStruct type="article"><analytic><title level="a" type="main">Masseter muscle thickness, chewing efficiency and bite force in edentulous patients with fixed and removable implant‐supported prostheses: a cross‐sectional multicenter study</title><title level="a" type="short">Masseter muscle thickness and bite force</title><author xml:id="author-0000"><persName><forename type="first">Frauke</forename><surname>Müller</surname></persName><affiliation>Division of Gerodontology and Removable Prosthodontics, University of Geneva, Geneva, Switzerland<address><country key="CH"></country></address></affiliation><affiliation>Department of Rehabilitation and Geriatrics, University Hospitals of Geneva, Thonex, Switzerland<address><country key="CH"></country></address></affiliation></author><author xml:id="author-0001"><persName><forename type="first">Marta</forename><surname>Hernandez</surname></persName><affiliation>Department of Periodontology, Oral Surgery, Oral Medicine, University Complutense Madrid, Madrid, Spain<address><country key="ES"></country></address></affiliation><affiliation>Department of Maxillofacial Surgery, Plastic Surgery and Centre of Oral Implantology, Katharinen Hospital, Stuttgart, Germany<address><country key="DE"></country></address></affiliation></author><author xml:id="author-0002"><persName><forename type="first">Linda</forename><surname>Grütter</surname></persName><affiliation>Division of Fixed Prosthodontics and Occlusion, University of Geneva, Geneva, Switzerland<address><country key="CH"></country></address></affiliation></author><author xml:id="author-0003"><persName><forename type="first">Luis</forename><surname>Aracil‐Kessler</surname></persName><affiliation>Department of Periodontology, Oral Surgery, Oral Medicine, University Complutense Madrid, Madrid, Spain<address><country key="ES"></country></address></affiliation></author><author xml:id="author-0004"><persName><forename type="first">Dieter</forename><surname>Weingart</surname></persName><affiliation>Department of Maxillofacial Surgery, Plastic Surgery and Centre of Oral Implantology, Katharinen Hospital, Stuttgart, Germany<address><country key="DE"></country></address></affiliation></author><author xml:id="author-0005"><persName><forename type="first">Martin</forename><surname>Schimmel</surname></persName><affiliation>Division of Gerodontology and Removable Prosthodontics, University of Geneva, Geneva, Switzerland<address><country key="CH"></country></address></affiliation></author><idno type="istex">DBABC09E425BE008D9C931285CA92791CACBC173</idno><idno type="ark">ark:/67375/WNG-5T9WPRWX-Q</idno><idno type="DOI">10.1111/j.1600-0501.2011.02213.x</idno><idno type="unit">CLR2213</idno><idno type="toTypesetVersion">file:CLR.CLR2213.pdf</idno></analytic><monogr><title level="j" type="main">Clinical Oral Implants Research</title><title level="j" type="alt">CLINICAL ORAL IMPLANTS RESEARCH</title><idno type="pISSN">0905-7161</idno><idno type="eISSN">1600-0501</idno><idno type="book-DOI">10.1111/(ISSN)1600-0501</idno><idno type="book-part-DOI">10.1111/clr.2012.23.issue-2</idno><idno type="product">CLR</idno><idno type="publisherDivision">ST</idno><imprint><biblScope unit="vol">23</biblScope><biblScope unit="issue">2</biblScope><biblScope unit="page" from="144">144</biblScope><biblScope unit="page" to="150">150</biblScope><biblScope unit="page-count">7</biblScope><publisher>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</publisher><pubPlace>Oxford, UK</pubPlace><date type="published" when="2012-02"></date></imprint></monogr></biblStruct></sourceDesc></fileDesc><profileDesc><abstract xml:lang="en" style="main"><head>Abstract</head><p><hi rend="bold">Objectives: </hi> Edentulous patients may be restored with conventional dentures (C/C), implant‐supported overdentures (IOD) or implant‐supported fixed dental prostheses (IFDP). Null‐hypotheses: chewing efficiency, maximum voluntary bite force (MBF) and masseter muscle thickness (MMT) are lower in patients with C/IOD compared with the patients with bimaxillary IFDPs. Both groups perform better than C/C and are inferior to fully dentate controls.</p><p><hi rend="bold">Material and methods: </hi> Ethical approval was obtained. For this multicenter cross‐sectional study, 80 patients were recruited. Four groups of different dental states comprised of either implant‐supported prostheses (C/IOD and IFDP/IFDP) or served as control‐groups (C/C and fully dentate D/D). Chewing efficiency was assessed with a two‐colour mixing ability test. MBF was measured bilaterally with a force gauge. Two dimensional ultrasonography was used to measure MMT bilaterally.</p><p><hi rend="bold">Results: </hi> Chewing efficiency in C/IOD and IFDP/IFDP (difference NS) was better than in C/C, but not as good as in D/D. MBF in C/IOD was lower than in IFDP/IFDP. Chewing efficiency and MBF were significantly lower in IFDP/IFDP, who had experienced chipping or fracture of the prosthetic superstructure. Median MMT of patients with implant‐supported prostheses was between those with C/C and fully dentate participants. There was no significant difference in MMT between C/IOD and IFDP/IFDP.</p><p><hi rend="bold">Conclusion: </hi> Supporting complete prostheses with oral implants seems to have positive effects on the thickness of the masseter muscle, maximum bite force as well as chewing efficiency. The type of implant‐supported prostheses may have an influence on the magnitude of the effect.</p><p><hi rend="bold">To cite this article</hi>:
Müller F, Hernandez M, Grütter L, Aracil‐Kessler L, Weingart D, Schimmel M. Masseter muscle thickness, chewing efficiency and bite force in edentulous patients with fixed and removable implant‐supported prostheses: a cross‐sectional multicenter study.
<hi rend="italic">Clin. Oral Impl. Res</hi>. <hi rend="bold">23</hi>, 2012; 144–150.
doi: 10.1111/j.1600‐0501.2011.02213.x</p></abstract><textClass><keywords xml:lang="en"><term xml:id="k1">implant‐supported fixed dental prostheses</term><term xml:id="k2">implant‐supported overdenture</term><term xml:id="k3">masseter muscle thickness</term><term xml:id="k4">masticatory efficiency</term><term xml:id="k5">maximum voluntary bite force</term><term xml:id="k6">ultrasound</term></keywords><keywords rend="tocHeading1"><term>Original Articles</term></keywords></textClass><langUsage><language ident="en"></language></langUsage></profileDesc></teiHeader></istex:fulltextTEI><json:item><extension>txt</extension><original>false</original><mimetype>text/plain</mimetype><uri>https://api.istex.fr/document/DBABC09E425BE008D9C931285CA92791CACBC173/fulltext/txt</uri></json:item></fulltext><metadata><istex:metadataXml wicri:clean="Wiley, elements deleted: body"><istex:xmlDeclaration>version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" standalone="yes"</istex:xmlDeclaration><istex:document><component version="2.0" type="serialArticle" xml:lang="en"><header><publicationMeta level="product"><publisherInfo><publisherName>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</publisherName><publisherLoc>Oxford, UK</publisherLoc></publisherInfo><doi origin="wiley" registered="yes">10.1111/(ISSN)1600-0501</doi><issn type="print">0905-7161</issn><issn type="electronic">1600-0501</issn><idGroup><id type="product" value="CLR"></id><id type="publisherDivision" value="ST"></id></idGroup><titleGroup><title type="main" sort="CLINICAL ORAL IMPLANTS RESEARCH">Clinical Oral Implants Research</title></titleGroup></publicationMeta><publicationMeta level="part" position="02102"><doi origin="wiley">10.1111/clr.2012.23.issue-2</doi><copyright ownership="publisher">Copyright © 2012 John Wiley & Sons A/S</copyright><numberingGroup><numbering type="journalVolume" number="23">23</numbering><numbering type="journalIssue">2</numbering></numberingGroup><coverDate startDate="2012-02">February 2012</coverDate></publicationMeta><publicationMeta level="unit" type="article" position="2" status="forIssue"><doi origin="wiley">10.1111/j.1600-0501.2011.02213.x</doi><idGroup><id type="unit" value="CLR2213"></id></idGroup><countGroup><count type="pageTotal" number="7"></count></countGroup><titleGroup><title type="tocHeading1">Original Articles</title></titleGroup><copyright>© 2011 John Wiley & Sons A/S</copyright><eventGroup><event type="xmlConverted" agent="Converter:BPG_TO_WML3G version:2.9.1 mode:FullText" date="2011-11-15"></event><event agent="SPS" date="2012-01-06" type="xmlCorrected"></event><event type="publishedOnlineEarlyUnpaginated" date="2011-06-02"></event><event type="firstOnline" date="2011-06-02"></event><event type="publishedOnlineFinalForm" date="2012-01-16"></event><event type="xmlConverted" agent="Converter:WILEY_ML3G_TO_WILEY_ML3GV2 version:4.0.1" date="2014-03-12"></event><event type="xmlConverted" agent="Converter:WML3G_To_WML3G version:4.3.4 mode:FullText" date="2015-02-25"></event></eventGroup><numberingGroup><numbering type="pageFirst">144</numbering><numbering type="pageLast">150</numbering></numberingGroup><correspondenceTo><b>Corresponding author:</b>
<i>Martin Schimmel, Dr Med Dent, MAS Oral Biol</i>
Division of Gerodontology and Removable Prosthodontics
University of Geneva
19, Rue Barthélemy‐Menn
CH‐1205
Geneva
Switzerland
Tel.: +41 22 379 4060
Fax: +41 22 379 4052
e‐mail: <email normalForm="martin.schimmel@unige.ch">martin.schimmel@unige.ch</email></correspondenceTo><linkGroup><link type="toTypesetVersion" href="file:CLR.CLR2213.pdf"></link></linkGroup></publicationMeta><contentMeta><unparsedEditorialHistory><b>Date:</b>, Accepted 31 March 2011</unparsedEditorialHistory><countGroup><count type="figureTotal" number="5"></count><count type="tableTotal" number="1"></count><count type="formulaTotal" number="0"></count><count type="referenceTotal" number="44"></count><count type="wordTotal" number="6829"></count><count type="linksCrossRef" number="58"></count></countGroup><titleGroup><title type="main">Masseter muscle thickness, chewing efficiency and bite force in edentulous patients with fixed and removable implant‐supported prostheses: a cross‐sectional multicenter study</title><title type="shortAuthors">Müller et al.</title><title type="short">Masseter muscle thickness and bite force</title></titleGroup><creators><creator creatorRole="author" xml:id="cr1" affiliationRef="#a1 #a2"><personName><givenNames>Frauke</givenNames><familyName>Müller</familyName></personName></creator><creator creatorRole="author" xml:id="cr2" affiliationRef="#a3 #a4"><personName><givenNames>Marta</givenNames><familyName>Hernandez</familyName></personName></creator><creator creatorRole="author" xml:id="cr3" affiliationRef="#a5"><personName><givenNames>Linda</givenNames><familyName>Grütter</familyName></personName></creator><creator creatorRole="author" xml:id="cr4" affiliationRef="#a3"><personName><givenNames>Luis</givenNames><familyName>Aracil‐Kessler</familyName></personName></creator><creator creatorRole="author" xml:id="cr5" affiliationRef="#a4"><personName><givenNames>Dieter</givenNames><familyName>Weingart</familyName></personName></creator><creator creatorRole="author" xml:id="cr6" affiliationRef="#a1"><personName><givenNames>Martin</givenNames><familyName>Schimmel</familyName></personName></creator></creators><affiliationGroup><affiliation xml:id="a1" countryCode="CH"><unparsedAffiliation>Division of Gerodontology and Removable Prosthodontics, University of Geneva, Geneva, Switzerland</unparsedAffiliation></affiliation><affiliation xml:id="a2" countryCode="CH"><unparsedAffiliation>Department of Rehabilitation and Geriatrics, University Hospitals of Geneva, Thonex, Switzerland</unparsedAffiliation></affiliation><affiliation xml:id="a3" countryCode="ES"><unparsedAffiliation>Department of Periodontology, Oral Surgery, Oral Medicine, University Complutense Madrid, Madrid, Spain</unparsedAffiliation></affiliation><affiliation xml:id="a4" countryCode="DE"><unparsedAffiliation>Department of Maxillofacial Surgery, Plastic Surgery and Centre of Oral Implantology, Katharinen Hospital, Stuttgart, Germany</unparsedAffiliation></affiliation><affiliation xml:id="a5" countryCode="CH"><unparsedAffiliation>Division of Fixed Prosthodontics and Occlusion, University of Geneva, Geneva, Switzerland</unparsedAffiliation></affiliation></affiliationGroup><keywordGroup xml:lang="en"><keyword xml:id="k1">implant‐supported fixed dental prostheses</keyword><keyword xml:id="k2">implant‐supported overdenture</keyword><keyword xml:id="k3">masseter muscle thickness</keyword><keyword xml:id="k4">masticatory efficiency</keyword><keyword xml:id="k5">maximum voluntary bite force</keyword><keyword xml:id="k6">ultrasound</keyword></keywordGroup><abstractGroup><abstract type="main" xml:lang="en"><title type="main">Abstract</title><p><b>Objectives: </b> Edentulous patients may be restored with conventional dentures (C/C), implant‐supported overdentures (IOD) or implant‐supported fixed dental prostheses (IFDP). Null‐hypotheses: chewing efficiency, maximum voluntary bite force (MBF) and masseter muscle thickness (MMT) are lower in patients with C/IOD compared with the patients with bimaxillary IFDPs. Both groups perform better than C/C and are inferior to fully dentate controls.</p><p><b>Material and methods: </b> Ethical approval was obtained. For this multicenter cross‐sectional study, 80 patients were recruited. Four groups of different dental states comprised of either implant‐supported prostheses (C/IOD and IFDP/IFDP) or served as control‐groups (C/C and fully dentate D/D). Chewing efficiency was assessed with a two‐colour mixing ability test. MBF was measured bilaterally with a force gauge. Two dimensional ultrasonography was used to measure MMT bilaterally.</p><p><b>Results: </b> Chewing efficiency in C/IOD and IFDP/IFDP (difference NS) was better than in C/C, but not as good as in D/D. MBF in C/IOD was lower than in IFDP/IFDP. Chewing efficiency and MBF were significantly lower in IFDP/IFDP, who had experienced chipping or fracture of the prosthetic superstructure. Median MMT of patients with implant‐supported prostheses was between those with C/C and fully dentate participants. There was no significant difference in MMT between C/IOD and IFDP/IFDP.</p><p><b>Conclusion: </b> Supporting complete prostheses with oral implants seems to have positive effects on the thickness of the masseter muscle, maximum bite force as well as chewing efficiency. The type of implant‐supported prostheses may have an influence on the magnitude of the effect.</p><p><b>To cite this article</b>:
Müller F, Hernandez M, Grütter L, Aracil‐Kessler L, Weingart D, Schimmel M. Masseter muscle thickness, chewing efficiency and bite force in edentulous patients with fixed and removable implant‐supported prostheses: a cross‐sectional multicenter study.
<i>Clin. Oral Impl. Res</i>. <b>23</b>, 2012; 144–150.
doi: 10.1111/j.1600‐0501.2011.02213.x</p></abstract></abstractGroup></contentMeta></header></component></istex:document></istex:metadataXml><mods version="3.6"><titleInfo lang="en"><title>Masseter muscle thickness, chewing efficiency and bite force in edentulous patients with fixed and removable implant‐supported prostheses: a cross‐sectional multicenter study</title></titleInfo><titleInfo type="abbreviated" lang="en"><title>Masseter muscle thickness and bite force</title></titleInfo><titleInfo type="alternative" contentType="CDATA" lang="en"><title>Masseter muscle thickness, chewing efficiency and bite force in edentulous patients with fixed and removable implant‐supported prostheses: a cross‐sectional multicenter study</title></titleInfo><name type="personal"><namePart type="given">Frauke</namePart><namePart type="family">Müller</namePart><affiliation>Division of Gerodontology and Removable Prosthodontics, University of Geneva, Geneva, Switzerland</affiliation><affiliation>Department of Rehabilitation and Geriatrics, University Hospitals of Geneva, Thonex, Switzerland</affiliation><role><roleTerm type="text">author</roleTerm></role></name><name type="personal"><namePart type="given">Marta</namePart><namePart type="family">Hernandez</namePart><affiliation>Department of Periodontology, Oral Surgery, Oral Medicine, University Complutense Madrid, Madrid, Spain</affiliation><affiliation>Department of Maxillofacial Surgery, Plastic Surgery and Centre of Oral Implantology, Katharinen Hospital, Stuttgart, Germany</affiliation><role><roleTerm type="text">author</roleTerm></role></name><name type="personal"><namePart type="given">Linda</namePart><namePart type="family">Grütter</namePart><affiliation>Division of Fixed Prosthodontics and Occlusion, University of Geneva, Geneva, Switzerland</affiliation><role><roleTerm type="text">author</roleTerm></role></name><name type="personal"><namePart type="given">Luis</namePart><namePart type="family">Aracil‐Kessler</namePart><affiliation>Department of Periodontology, Oral Surgery, Oral Medicine, University Complutense Madrid, Madrid, Spain</affiliation><role><roleTerm type="text">author</roleTerm></role></name><name type="personal"><namePart type="given">Dieter</namePart><namePart type="family">Weingart</namePart><affiliation>Department of Maxillofacial Surgery, Plastic Surgery and Centre of Oral Implantology, Katharinen Hospital, Stuttgart, Germany</affiliation><role><roleTerm type="text">author</roleTerm></role></name><name type="personal"><namePart type="given">Martin</namePart><namePart type="family">Schimmel</namePart><affiliation>Division of Gerodontology and Removable Prosthodontics, University of Geneva, Geneva, Switzerland</affiliation><role><roleTerm type="text">author</roleTerm></role></name><typeOfResource>text</typeOfResource><genre type="article" displayLabel="article" authority="ISTEX" authorityURI="https://content-type.data.istex.fr" valueURI="https://content-type.data.istex.fr/ark:/67375/XTP-6N5SZHKN-D">article</genre><originInfo><publisher>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</publisher><place><placeTerm type="text">Oxford, UK</placeTerm></place><dateIssued encoding="w3cdtf">2012-02</dateIssued><edition>Date:, Accepted 31 March 2011</edition><copyrightDate encoding="w3cdtf">2012</copyrightDate></originInfo><language><languageTerm type="code" authority="rfc3066">en</languageTerm><languageTerm type="code" authority="iso639-2b">eng</languageTerm></language><physicalDescription><extent unit="figures">5</extent><extent unit="tables">1</extent><extent unit="formulas">0</extent><extent unit="references">44</extent><extent unit="linksCrossRef">58</extent><extent unit="words">6829</extent></physicalDescription><abstract>Objectives: Edentulous patients may be restored with conventional dentures (C/C), implant‐supported overdentures (IOD) or implant‐supported fixed dental prostheses (IFDP). Null‐hypotheses: chewing efficiency, maximum voluntary bite force (MBF) and masseter muscle thickness (MMT) are lower in patients with C/IOD compared with the patients with bimaxillary IFDPs. Both groups perform better than C/C and are inferior to fully dentate controls.</abstract><abstract>Material and methods: Ethical approval was obtained. For this multicenter cross‐sectional study, 80 patients were recruited. Four groups of different dental states comprised of either implant‐supported prostheses (C/IOD and IFDP/IFDP) or served as control‐groups (C/C and fully dentate D/D). Chewing efficiency was assessed with a two‐colour mixing ability test. MBF was measured bilaterally with a force gauge. Two dimensional ultrasonography was used to measure MMT bilaterally.</abstract><abstract>Results: Chewing efficiency in C/IOD and IFDP/IFDP (difference NS) was better than in C/C, but not as good as in D/D. MBF in C/IOD was lower than in IFDP/IFDP. Chewing efficiency and MBF were significantly lower in IFDP/IFDP, who had experienced chipping or fracture of the prosthetic superstructure. Median MMT of patients with implant‐supported prostheses was between those with C/C and fully dentate participants. There was no significant difference in MMT between C/IOD and IFDP/IFDP.</abstract><abstract>Conclusion: Supporting complete prostheses with oral implants seems to have positive effects on the thickness of the masseter muscle, maximum bite force as well as chewing efficiency. The type of implant‐supported prostheses may have an influence on the magnitude of the effect.</abstract><abstract>To cite this article:
Müller F, Hernandez M, Grütter L, Aracil‐Kessler L, Weingart D, Schimmel M. Masseter muscle thickness, chewing efficiency and bite force in edentulous patients with fixed and removable implant‐supported prostheses: a cross‐sectional multicenter study.
Clin. Oral Impl. Res. 23, 2012; 144–150.
doi: 10.1111/j.1600‐0501.2011.02213.x</abstract><subject lang="en"><genre>keywords</genre><topic>implant‐supported fixed dental prostheses</topic><topic>implant‐supported overdenture</topic><topic>masseter muscle thickness</topic><topic>masticatory efficiency</topic><topic>maximum voluntary bite force</topic><topic>ultrasound</topic></subject><relatedItem type="host"><titleInfo><title>Clinical Oral Implants Research</title></titleInfo><genre type="journal" authority="ISTEX" authorityURI="https://publication-type.data.istex.fr" valueURI="https://publication-type.data.istex.fr/ark:/67375/JMC-0GLKJH51-B">journal</genre><identifier type="ISSN">0905-7161</identifier><identifier type="eISSN">1600-0501</identifier><identifier type="DOI">10.1111/(ISSN)1600-0501</identifier><identifier type="PublisherID">CLR</identifier><part><date>2012</date><detail type="volume"><caption>vol.</caption><number>23</number></detail><detail type="issue"><caption>no.</caption><number>2</number></detail><extent unit="pages"><start>144</start><end>150</end><total>7</total></extent></part></relatedItem><identifier type="istex">DBABC09E425BE008D9C931285CA92791CACBC173</identifier><identifier type="ark">ark:/67375/WNG-5T9WPRWX-Q</identifier><identifier type="DOI">10.1111/j.1600-0501.2011.02213.x</identifier><identifier type="ArticleID">CLR2213</identifier><accessCondition type="use and reproduction" contentType="copyright">Copyright © 2012 John Wiley & Sons A/S© 2011 John Wiley & Sons A/S</accessCondition><recordInfo><recordContentSource authority="ISTEX" authorityURI="https://loaded-corpus.data.istex.fr" valueURI="https://loaded-corpus.data.istex.fr/ark:/67375/XBH-L0C46X92-X">wiley</recordContentSource><recordOrigin>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</recordOrigin></recordInfo></mods><json:item><extension>json</extension><original>false</original><mimetype>application/json</mimetype><uri>https://api.istex.fr/document/DBABC09E425BE008D9C931285CA92791CACBC173/metadata/json</uri></json:item></metadata><serie></serie></istex></record>Pour manipuler ce document sous Unix (Dilib)
EXPLOR_STEP=$WICRI_ROOT/Wicri/Santé/explor/EdenteV2/Data/Istex/Corpus
HfdSelect -h $EXPLOR_STEP/biblio.hfd -nk 006D03 | SxmlIndent | more
Ou
HfdSelect -h $EXPLOR_AREA/Data/Istex/Corpus/biblio.hfd -nk 006D03 | SxmlIndent | more
Pour mettre un lien sur cette page dans le réseau Wicri
{{Explor lien
|wiki= Wicri/Santé
|area= EdenteV2
|flux= Istex
|étape= Corpus
|type= RBID
|clé= ISTEX:DBABC09E425BE008D9C931285CA92791CACBC173
|texte= Masseter muscle thickness, chewing efficiency and bite force in edentulous patients with fixed and removable implant‐supported prostheses: a cross‐sectional multicenter study
}}
| This area was generated with Dilib version V0.6.32. |  |