Short‐term complications of implant‐supported and combined tooth‐implant‐supported fixed dental prostheses
Identifieur interne : 006B97 ( Istex/Corpus ); précédent : 006B96; suivant : 006B98Short‐term complications of implant‐supported and combined tooth‐implant‐supported fixed dental prostheses
Auteurs : Peter Rammelsberg ; Stefanie Schwarz ; Christin Schroeder ; Justo L. Bermejo ; Olaf GabbertSource :
- Clinical Oral Implants Research [ 0905-7161 ] ; 2013-07.
English descriptors
- KwdEn :
- Abutment, Bold type, Cantilever, Cantilever fdps, Ceramic veneer, Clinical study, Complication, Complication rates, Conventional fdps, Dental prostheses, Dental surgery, Fdps, Fracture, Fracture resistance, Frequent complication, Frequent complications, Gender location, Hazard ratio, High incidence, Implant, Implant cantilever, Implants research, Lang, Level fdps complications, Lower part, Maxilla, Maxilla mandible, Metal framework, Multivariate, Multivariate analysis, Observation period, Oral impl, Oral rehabilitation, Partial dentures, Permanent cement, Pjetursson, Posterior fdps, Posterior region, Prosthesis, Prosthesis characteristics, Prosthetic, Rammelsberg, Random effect, Reference category, Retrospective analysis, Single crowns, Systematic review, Units support material fixation, Veneer, Zirconia, Zirconia fdps, Zirconia framework, Zirconia frameworks.
- Teeft :
- Abutment, Bold type, Cantilever, Cantilever fdps, Ceramic veneer, Clinical study, Complication, Complication rates, Conventional fdps, Dental prostheses, Dental surgery, Fdps, Fracture, Fracture resistance, Frequent complication, Frequent complications, Gender location, Hazard ratio, High incidence, Implant, Implant cantilever, Implants research, Lang, Level fdps complications, Lower part, Maxilla, Maxilla mandible, Metal framework, Multivariate, Multivariate analysis, Observation period, Oral impl, Oral rehabilitation, Partial dentures, Permanent cement, Pjetursson, Posterior fdps, Posterior region, Prosthesis, Prosthesis characteristics, Prosthetic, Rammelsberg, Random effect, Reference category, Retrospective analysis, Single crowns, Systematic review, Units support material fixation, Veneer, Zirconia, Zirconia fdps, Zirconia framework, Zirconia frameworks.
Abstract
The objective of this clinical study was to evaluate survival and incidence of complications for metal‐ceramic and all‐ceramic implant‐supported fixed dental prostheses (FDPs) and tooth‐implant‐supported FDPs.
Url:
DOI: 10.1111/j.1600-0501.2012.02482.x
Links to Exploration step
ISTEX:D9AE1B998063D6898C53DCF42B9B46578CAC395FLe document en format XML
<record><TEI wicri:istexFullTextTei="biblStruct"><teiHeader><fileDesc><titleStmt><title xml:lang="en">Short‐term complications of implant‐supported and combined tooth‐implant‐supported fixed dental prostheses</title><author><name sortKey="Rammelsberg, Peter" sort="Rammelsberg, Peter" uniqKey="Rammelsberg P" first="Peter" last="Rammelsberg">Peter Rammelsberg</name><affiliation><mods:affiliation>Department of Prosthodontics</mods:affiliation></affiliation><affiliation><mods:affiliation>Peter RammelsbergDepartment of Prosthodontics, University of HeidelbergIm Neuenheimer Feld 40069120 Heidelberg, GermanyTel.: +0049 6221 568799Fax: +0049 6221 566032e‐mail:</mods:affiliation></affiliation><affiliation><mods:affiliation>E-mail: peter_rammelsberg@med.uni-heidelberg.de</mods:affiliation></affiliation></author><author><name sortKey="Schwarz, Stefanie" sort="Schwarz, Stefanie" uniqKey="Schwarz S" first="Stefanie" last="Schwarz">Stefanie Schwarz</name><affiliation><mods:affiliation>Department of Prosthodontics</mods:affiliation></affiliation></author><author><name sortKey="Schroeder, Christin" sort="Schroeder, Christin" uniqKey="Schroeder C" first="Christin" last="Schroeder">Christin Schroeder</name><affiliation><mods:affiliation>Department of Prosthodontics</mods:affiliation></affiliation></author><author><name sortKey="Bermejo, Justo L" sort="Bermejo, Justo L" uniqKey="Bermejo J" first="Justo L." last="Bermejo">Justo L. Bermejo</name><affiliation><mods:affiliation>Institute of Medical Biometry and Informatics, University of Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany</mods:affiliation></affiliation></author><author><name sortKey="Gabbert, Olaf" sort="Gabbert, Olaf" uniqKey="Gabbert O" first="Olaf" last="Gabbert">Olaf Gabbert</name><affiliation><mods:affiliation>Department of Prosthodontics</mods:affiliation></affiliation></author></titleStmt><publicationStmt><idno type="wicri:source">ISTEX</idno><idno type="RBID">ISTEX:D9AE1B998063D6898C53DCF42B9B46578CAC395F</idno><date when="2013" year="2013">2013</date><idno type="doi">10.1111/j.1600-0501.2012.02482.x</idno><idno type="url">https://api.istex.fr/document/D9AE1B998063D6898C53DCF42B9B46578CAC395F/fulltext/pdf</idno><idno type="wicri:Area/Istex/Corpus">006B97</idno><idno type="wicri:explorRef" wicri:stream="Istex" wicri:step="Corpus" wicri:corpus="ISTEX">006B97</idno></publicationStmt><sourceDesc><biblStruct><analytic><title level="a" type="main">Short‐term complications of implant‐supported and combined tooth‐implant‐supported fixed dental prostheses</title><author><name sortKey="Rammelsberg, Peter" sort="Rammelsberg, Peter" uniqKey="Rammelsberg P" first="Peter" last="Rammelsberg">Peter Rammelsberg</name><affiliation><mods:affiliation>Department of Prosthodontics</mods:affiliation></affiliation><affiliation><mods:affiliation>Peter RammelsbergDepartment of Prosthodontics, University of HeidelbergIm Neuenheimer Feld 40069120 Heidelberg, GermanyTel.: +0049 6221 568799Fax: +0049 6221 566032e‐mail:</mods:affiliation></affiliation><affiliation><mods:affiliation>E-mail: peter_rammelsberg@med.uni-heidelberg.de</mods:affiliation></affiliation></author><author><name sortKey="Schwarz, Stefanie" sort="Schwarz, Stefanie" uniqKey="Schwarz S" first="Stefanie" last="Schwarz">Stefanie Schwarz</name><affiliation><mods:affiliation>Department of Prosthodontics</mods:affiliation></affiliation></author><author><name sortKey="Schroeder, Christin" sort="Schroeder, Christin" uniqKey="Schroeder C" first="Christin" last="Schroeder">Christin Schroeder</name><affiliation><mods:affiliation>Department of Prosthodontics</mods:affiliation></affiliation></author><author><name sortKey="Bermejo, Justo L" sort="Bermejo, Justo L" uniqKey="Bermejo J" first="Justo L." last="Bermejo">Justo L. Bermejo</name><affiliation><mods:affiliation>Institute of Medical Biometry and Informatics, University of Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany</mods:affiliation></affiliation></author><author><name sortKey="Gabbert, Olaf" sort="Gabbert, Olaf" uniqKey="Gabbert O" first="Olaf" last="Gabbert">Olaf Gabbert</name><affiliation><mods:affiliation>Department of Prosthodontics</mods:affiliation></affiliation></author></analytic><monogr></monogr><series><title level="j" type="main">Clinical Oral Implants Research</title><title level="j" type="alt">CLINICAL ORAL IMPLANTS RESEARCH</title><idno type="ISSN">0905-7161</idno><idno type="eISSN">1600-0501</idno><imprint><biblScope unit="vol">24</biblScope><biblScope unit="issue">7</biblScope><biblScope unit="page" from="758">758</biblScope><biblScope unit="page" to="762">762</biblScope><biblScope unit="page-count">5</biblScope><date type="published" when="2013-07">2013-07</date></imprint><idno type="ISSN">0905-7161</idno></series></biblStruct></sourceDesc><seriesStmt><idno type="ISSN">0905-7161</idno></seriesStmt></fileDesc><profileDesc><textClass><keywords scheme="KwdEn" xml:lang="en"><term>Abutment</term><term>Bold type</term><term>Cantilever</term><term>Cantilever fdps</term><term>Ceramic veneer</term><term>Clinical study</term><term>Complication</term><term>Complication rates</term><term>Conventional fdps</term><term>Dental prostheses</term><term>Dental surgery</term><term>Fdps</term><term>Fracture</term><term>Fracture resistance</term><term>Frequent complication</term><term>Frequent complications</term><term>Gender location</term><term>Hazard ratio</term><term>High incidence</term><term>Implant</term><term>Implant cantilever</term><term>Implants research</term><term>Lang</term><term>Level fdps complications</term><term>Lower part</term><term>Maxilla</term><term>Maxilla mandible</term><term>Metal framework</term><term>Multivariate</term><term>Multivariate analysis</term><term>Observation period</term><term>Oral impl</term><term>Oral rehabilitation</term><term>Partial dentures</term><term>Permanent cement</term><term>Pjetursson</term><term>Posterior fdps</term><term>Posterior region</term><term>Prosthesis</term><term>Prosthesis characteristics</term><term>Prosthetic</term><term>Rammelsberg</term><term>Random effect</term><term>Reference category</term><term>Retrospective analysis</term><term>Single crowns</term><term>Systematic review</term><term>Units support material fixation</term><term>Veneer</term><term>Zirconia</term><term>Zirconia fdps</term><term>Zirconia framework</term><term>Zirconia frameworks</term></keywords><keywords scheme="Teeft" xml:lang="en"><term>Abutment</term><term>Bold type</term><term>Cantilever</term><term>Cantilever fdps</term><term>Ceramic veneer</term><term>Clinical study</term><term>Complication</term><term>Complication rates</term><term>Conventional fdps</term><term>Dental prostheses</term><term>Dental surgery</term><term>Fdps</term><term>Fracture</term><term>Fracture resistance</term><term>Frequent complication</term><term>Frequent complications</term><term>Gender location</term><term>Hazard ratio</term><term>High incidence</term><term>Implant</term><term>Implant cantilever</term><term>Implants research</term><term>Lang</term><term>Level fdps complications</term><term>Lower part</term><term>Maxilla</term><term>Maxilla mandible</term><term>Metal framework</term><term>Multivariate</term><term>Multivariate analysis</term><term>Observation period</term><term>Oral impl</term><term>Oral rehabilitation</term><term>Partial dentures</term><term>Permanent cement</term><term>Pjetursson</term><term>Posterior fdps</term><term>Posterior region</term><term>Prosthesis</term><term>Prosthesis characteristics</term><term>Prosthetic</term><term>Rammelsberg</term><term>Random effect</term><term>Reference category</term><term>Retrospective analysis</term><term>Single crowns</term><term>Systematic review</term><term>Units support material fixation</term><term>Veneer</term><term>Zirconia</term><term>Zirconia fdps</term><term>Zirconia framework</term><term>Zirconia frameworks</term></keywords></textClass></profileDesc></teiHeader><front><div type="abstract">The objective of this clinical study was to evaluate survival and incidence of complications for metal‐ceramic and all‐ceramic implant‐supported fixed dental prostheses (FDPs) and tooth‐implant‐supported FDPs.</div></front></TEI><istex><corpusName>wiley</corpusName><keywords><teeft><json:string>fdps</json:string><json:string>prosthesis</json:string><json:string>implant</json:string><json:string>zirconia</json:string><json:string>cantilever</json:string><json:string>dental prostheses</json:string><json:string>rammelsberg</json:string><json:string>pjetursson</json:string><json:string>veneer</json:string><json:string>abutment</json:string><json:string>fracture</json:string><json:string>cantilever fdps</json:string><json:string>prosthetic</json:string><json:string>permanent cement</json:string><json:string>maxilla</json:string><json:string>multivariate</json:string><json:string>hazard ratio</json:string><json:string>complication</json:string><json:string>systematic review</json:string><json:string>observation period</json:string><json:string>implants research</json:string><json:string>ceramic veneer</json:string><json:string>zirconia frameworks</json:string><json:string>zirconia fdps</json:string><json:string>frequent complications</json:string><json:string>oral impl</json:string><json:string>posterior region</json:string><json:string>complication rates</json:string><json:string>clinical study</json:string><json:string>units support material fixation</json:string><json:string>lower part</json:string><json:string>posterior fdps</json:string><json:string>implant cantilever</json:string><json:string>lang</json:string><json:string>partial dentures</json:string><json:string>random effect</json:string><json:string>dental surgery</json:string><json:string>conventional fdps</json:string><json:string>frequent complication</json:string><json:string>high incidence</json:string><json:string>multivariate analysis</json:string><json:string>prosthesis characteristics</json:string><json:string>level fdps complications</json:string><json:string>single crowns</json:string><json:string>gender location</json:string><json:string>reference category</json:string><json:string>bold type</json:string><json:string>fracture resistance</json:string><json:string>zirconia framework</json:string><json:string>retrospective analysis</json:string><json:string>metal framework</json:string><json:string>oral rehabilitation</json:string><json:string>maxilla mandible</json:string></teeft></keywords><author><json:item><name>Peter Rammelsberg</name><affiliations><json:string>Department of Prosthodontics</json:string><json:string>Peter RammelsbergDepartment of Prosthodontics, University of HeidelbergIm Neuenheimer Feld 40069120 Heidelberg, GermanyTel.: +0049 6221 568799Fax: +0049 6221 566032e‐mail:</json:string><json:string>E-mail: peter_rammelsberg@med.uni-heidelberg.de</json:string></affiliations></json:item><json:item><name>Stefanie Schwarz</name><affiliations><json:string>Department of Prosthodontics</json:string></affiliations></json:item><json:item><name>Christin Schroeder</name><affiliations><json:string>Department of Prosthodontics</json:string></affiliations></json:item><json:item><name>Justo L. Bermejo</name><affiliations><json:string>Institute of Medical Biometry and Informatics, University of Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany</json:string></affiliations></json:item><json:item><name>Olaf Gabbert</name><affiliations><json:string>Department of Prosthodontics</json:string></affiliations></json:item></author><subject><json:item><lang><json:string>eng</json:string></lang><value>ceramic veneer</value></json:item><json:item><lang><json:string>eng</json:string></lang><value>complication</value></json:item><json:item><lang><json:string>eng</json:string></lang><value>dental implants</value></json:item><json:item><lang><json:string>eng</json:string></lang><value>fixed dental prosthesis</value></json:item><json:item><lang><json:string>eng</json:string></lang><value>metal framework</value></json:item><json:item><lang><json:string>eng</json:string></lang><value>zirconia</value></json:item></subject><articleId><json:string>CLR2482</json:string></articleId><arkIstex>ark:/67375/WNG-CC1JGN5J-P</arkIstex><language><json:string>eng</json:string></language><originalGenre><json:string>article</json:string></originalGenre><abstract>The objective of this clinical study was to evaluate survival and incidence of complications for metal‐ceramic and all‐ceramic implant‐supported fixed dental prostheses (FDPs) and tooth‐implant‐supported FDPs.</abstract><qualityIndicators><score>5.703</score><pdfWordCount>3391</pdfWordCount><pdfCharCount>24186</pdfCharCount><pdfVersion>1.7</pdfVersion><pdfPageCount>5</pdfPageCount><pdfPageSize>595.276 x 782.362 pts</pdfPageSize><refBibsNative>true</refBibsNative><abstractWordCount>26</abstractWordCount><abstractCharCount>209</abstractCharCount><keywordCount>6</keywordCount></qualityIndicators><title>Short‐term complications of implant‐supported and combined tooth‐implant‐supported fixed dental prostheses</title><pmid><json:string>22568699</json:string></pmid><genre><json:string>article</json:string></genre><host><title>Clinical Oral Implants Research</title><language><json:string>unknown</json:string></language><doi><json:string>10.1111/(ISSN)1600-0501</json:string></doi><issn><json:string>0905-7161</json:string></issn><eissn><json:string>1600-0501</json:string></eissn><publisherId><json:string>CLR</json:string></publisherId><volume>24</volume><issue>7</issue><pages><first>758</first><last>762</last><total>5</total></pages><genre><json:string>journal</json:string></genre><subject><json:item><value>Original Research Article</value></json:item></subject></host><namedEntities><unitex><date><json:string>2012-04-03</json:string></date><geogName></geogName><orgName><json:string>University Hospital of Heidelberg</json:string><json:string>Peter Rammelsberg Department of Prosthodontics, University of Heidelberg Im Neuenheimer Feld</json:string><json:string>Department of Prosthodontics</json:string><json:string>University of Heidelberg</json:string><json:string>Germany Tel</json:string><json:string>Institute of Medical Biometry and Informatics</json:string><json:string>Germany Short</json:string></orgName><orgName_funder></orgName_funder><orgName_provider></orgName_provider><persName><json:string>John Wiley</json:string><json:string>Olaf Gabbert</json:string><json:string>Their</json:string><json:string>Peter Rammelsberg</json:string><json:string>Previous</json:string><json:string>Ian Davies</json:string><json:string>Stefanie Schwarz</json:string></persName><placeName><json:string>Germany</json:string><json:string>Heidelberg</json:string></placeName><ref_url></ref_url><ref_bibl><json:string>Al-Amleh et al. (2010)</json:string><json:string>Aglietta et al. 2009</json:string><json:string>Chaar et al. (2011)</json:string><json:string>Van der Bilt et al. 2008</json:string><json:string>Pjetursson et al. 2004</json:string><json:string>Rammelsberg et al.</json:string><json:string>Molin & Karlsson 2008</json:string><json:string>Aglietta et al. (2009)</json:string><json:string>Pjetursson & Lang 2008</json:string><json:string>Sailer et al. (2007)</json:string><json:string>Lang et al. (2004)</json:string><json:string>Gabbert et al. 2011</json:string><json:string>Studart et al. 2007</json:string><json:string>Larsson et al. 2006</json:string><json:string>Lambert et al. (2009)</json:string><json:string>Schwarz et al. 2011</json:string><json:string>Pjetursson et al. (2007)</json:string></ref_bibl><bibl></bibl></unitex></namedEntities><ark><json:string>ark:/67375/WNG-CC1JGN5J-P</json:string></ark><categories><wos><json:string>1 - science</json:string><json:string>2 - engineering, biomedical</json:string><json:string>2 - dentistry, oral surgery & medicine</json:string></wos><scienceMetrix><json:string>1 - health sciences</json:string><json:string>2 - clinical medicine</json:string><json:string>3 - dentistry</json:string></scienceMetrix><scopus><json:string>1 - Health Sciences</json:string><json:string>2 - Dentistry</json:string><json:string>3 - Oral Surgery</json:string></scopus></categories><publicationDate>2013</publicationDate><copyrightDate>2013</copyrightDate><doi><json:string>10.1111/j.1600-0501.2012.02482.x</json:string></doi><id>D9AE1B998063D6898C53DCF42B9B46578CAC395F</id><score>1</score><fulltext><json:item><extension>pdf</extension><original>true</original><mimetype>application/pdf</mimetype><uri>https://api.istex.fr/document/D9AE1B998063D6898C53DCF42B9B46578CAC395F/fulltext/pdf</uri></json:item><json:item><extension>zip</extension><original>false</original><mimetype>application/zip</mimetype><uri>https://api.istex.fr/document/D9AE1B998063D6898C53DCF42B9B46578CAC395F/fulltext/zip</uri></json:item><istex:fulltextTEI uri="https://api.istex.fr/document/D9AE1B998063D6898C53DCF42B9B46578CAC395F/fulltext/tei"><teiHeader><fileDesc><titleStmt><title level="a" type="main">Short‐term complications of implant‐supported and combined tooth‐implant‐supported fixed dental prostheses</title></titleStmt><publicationStmt><authority>ISTEX</authority><publisher>Wiley Publishing Ltd</publisher><availability><licence>© 2012 John Wiley & Sons A/S</licence></availability><date type="published" when="2013-07"></date></publicationStmt><notesStmt><note type="content-type" subtype="article" source="article" scheme="https://content-type.data.istex.fr/ark:/67375/XTP-6N5SZHKN-D">article</note><note type="publication-type" subtype="journal" scheme="https://publication-type.data.istex.fr/ark:/67375/JMC-0GLKJH51-B">journal</note></notesStmt><sourceDesc><biblStruct type="article"><analytic><title level="a" type="main">Short‐term complications of implant‐supported and combined tooth‐implant‐supported fixed dental prostheses</title><author xml:id="author-0000" role="corresp"><persName><forename type="first">Peter</forename><surname>Rammelsberg</surname></persName><affiliation><orgName>Department of Prosthodontics</orgName></affiliation><affiliation>Corresponding author: Peter Rammelsberg Department of Prosthodontics, University of Heidelberg Im Neuenheimer Feld 400 69120 Heidelberg, Germany Tel.: +0049 6221 568799 Fax: +0049 6221 566032 e‐mail: peter_rammelsberg@med.uni-heidelberg.de</affiliation></author><author xml:id="author-0001"><persName><forename type="first">Stefanie</forename><surname>Schwarz</surname></persName><affiliation><orgName>Department of Prosthodontics</orgName></affiliation></author><author xml:id="author-0002"><persName><forename type="first">Christin</forename><surname>Schroeder</surname></persName><affiliation><orgName>Department of Prosthodontics</orgName></affiliation></author><author xml:id="author-0003"><persName><forename type="first">Justo L.</forename><surname>Bermejo</surname></persName><affiliation><orgName>Institute of Medical Biometry and Informatics</orgName><orgName>University of Heidelberg</orgName><address><settlement type="city">Heidelberg</settlement><country key="DE">Germany</country></address></affiliation></author><author xml:id="author-0004"><persName><forename type="first">Olaf</forename><surname>Gabbert</surname></persName><affiliation><orgName>Department of Prosthodontics</orgName></affiliation></author><idno type="istex">D9AE1B998063D6898C53DCF42B9B46578CAC395F</idno><idno type="ark">ark:/67375/WNG-CC1JGN5J-P</idno><idno type="DOI">10.1111/j.1600-0501.2012.02482.x</idno><idno type="unit">CLR2482</idno><idno type="toTypesetVersion">file:CLR.CLR2482.pdf</idno></analytic><monogr><title level="j" type="main">Clinical Oral Implants Research</title><title level="j" type="alt">CLINICAL ORAL IMPLANTS RESEARCH</title><idno type="pISSN">0905-7161</idno><idno type="eISSN">1600-0501</idno><idno type="book-DOI">10.1111/(ISSN)1600-0501</idno><idno type="book-part-DOI">10.1111/clr.2013.24.issue-7</idno><idno type="product">CLR</idno><imprint><biblScope unit="vol">24</biblScope><biblScope unit="issue">7</biblScope><biblScope unit="page" from="758">758</biblScope><biblScope unit="page" to="762">762</biblScope><biblScope unit="page-count">5</biblScope><date type="published" when="2013-07"></date></imprint></monogr></biblStruct></sourceDesc></fileDesc><profileDesc><abstract style="main" xml:id="clr2482-abs-0001"><head>Abstract</head>
Objective
<p>The objective of this clinical study was to evaluate survival and incidence of complications for metal‐ceramic and all‐ceramic implant‐supported fixed dental prostheses (<hi rend="fc">FDP</hi>s) and tooth‐implant‐supported <hi rend="fc">FDP</hi>s.</p>
Material and methods
<p>One‐hundred and sixty‐six <hi rend="fc">FDP</hi>s placed in 132 patients from a prospective study were selected for this retrospective analysis. Included were 91 conventional implant‐supported <hi rend="fc">FDP</hi>s with implant support on both extremities, 27 implant‐supported cantilever <hi rend="fc">FDP</hi>s, and 48 tooth‐implant‐supported <hi rend="fc">FDP</hi>s. All restorations were veneered with ceramic. Twenty‐six <hi rend="fc">FDP</hi>s had a zirconia framework and 140 had a metal framework. Kaplan–Meier analysis was performed to estimate <hi rend="fc">FDP</hi> success defined as complication‐free survival and the Cox regression model was used to isolate risk factors for the most frequent complications.</p>
Results
<p>Within a median follow‐up of 1 year and 2 months, three failures were caused by a failed implant (<hi rend="italic">n</hi> = 2) and by extended chipping of the veneer (<hi rend="italic">n</hi> = 1). In contrast with this low incidence of failure was a high incidence of complications including chipping (<hi rend="italic">n</hi> = 29), loss of retention (<hi rend="italic">n</hi> = 35), and abutment fractures (<hi rend="italic">n</hi> = 2). Multivariate survival analysis revealed a significantly greater incidence of chipping for males and a tendency to increased incidence of chipping for zirconia‐based <hi rend="fc">FDP</hi>s. The incidence of loss of retention tended to be less for tooth‐implant‐supported <hi rend="fc">FDP</hi>s, for which semi‐permanent cement was the only significant risk factor, with a hazard ratio of almost 5.</p>
Conclusions
<p>As chipping of the ceramic veneer was the most frequent complication leading to substantial aftercare, improvements of ceramic veneers are desirable for zirconia‐based and metal‐based <hi rend="fc">FDP</hi>s.</p></abstract><textClass><keywords><term xml:id="clr2482-kwd-0001">ceramic veneer</term><term xml:id="clr2482-kwd-0002">complication</term><term xml:id="clr2482-kwd-0003">dental implants</term><term xml:id="clr2482-kwd-0004">fixed dental prosthesis</term><term xml:id="clr2482-kwd-0005">metal framework</term><term xml:id="clr2482-kwd-0006">zirconia</term></keywords><keywords rend="articleCategory"><term>Original Research Article</term></keywords><keywords rend="tocHeading1"><term>Original Articles</term></keywords></textClass><langUsage><language ident="en"></language></langUsage></profileDesc></teiHeader></istex:fulltextTEI><json:item><extension>txt</extension><original>false</original><mimetype>text/plain</mimetype><uri>https://api.istex.fr/document/D9AE1B998063D6898C53DCF42B9B46578CAC395F/fulltext/txt</uri></json:item></fulltext><metadata><istex:metadataXml wicri:clean="Wiley, elements deleted: body"><istex:xmlDeclaration>version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" standalone="yes"</istex:xmlDeclaration><istex:document><component type="serialArticle" version="2.0" xml:id="clr2482" xml:lang="en"><header><publicationMeta level="product"><doi origin="wiley" registered="yes">10.1111/(ISSN)1600-0501</doi><issn type="print">0905-7161</issn><issn type="electronic">1600-0501</issn><idGroup><id type="product" value="CLR"></id></idGroup><titleGroup><title sort="CLINICAL ORAL IMPLANTS RESEARCH" type="main">Clinical Oral Implants Research</title><title type="short">Clin. Oral Impl. Res.</title></titleGroup></publicationMeta><publicationMeta level="part" position="70"><doi origin="wiley">10.1111/clr.2013.24.issue-7</doi><copyright ownership="publisher">Copyright © 2013 John Wiley & Sons A/S</copyright><numberingGroup><numbering type="journalVolume" number="24">24</numbering><numbering type="journalIssue">7</numbering></numberingGroup><coverDate startDate="2013-07">July 2013</coverDate></publicationMeta><publicationMeta level="unit" position="70" status="forIssue" type="article"><doi>10.1111/j.1600-0501.2012.02482.x</doi><idGroup><id type="unit" value="CLR2482"></id></idGroup><countGroup><count number="5" type="pageTotal"></count></countGroup><titleGroup><title type="articleCategory">Original Research Article</title><title type="tocHeading1">Original Articles</title></titleGroup><copyright ownership="publisher">© 2012 John Wiley & Sons A/S</copyright><eventGroup><event date="2012-03-19" type="manuscriptAccepted"></event><event agent="SPS" date="2012-04-03" type="xmlCreated"></event><event type="publishedOnlineEarlyUnpaginated" date="2012-05-09"></event><event type="firstOnline" date="2012-05-09"></event><event type="publishedOnlineFinalForm" date="2013-06-04"></event><event type="xmlConverted" agent="Converter:WILEY_ML3G_TO_WILEY_ML3GV2 version:4.0.1" date="2014-03-12"></event><event type="xmlConverted" agent="Converter:WML3G_To_WML3G version:4.6.4 mode:FullText" date="2015-10-02"></event></eventGroup><numberingGroup><numbering type="pageFirst">758</numbering><numbering type="pageLast">762</numbering></numberingGroup><correspondenceTo><lineatedText><line><b>Corresponding author:</b></line><line>Peter Rammelsberg</line><line>Department of Prosthodontics, University of Heidelberg</line><line>Im Neuenheimer Feld 400</line><line>69120 Heidelberg, Germany</line><line>Tel.: +0049 6221 568799</line><line>Fax: +0049 6221 566032</line><line>e‐mail: <email>peter_rammelsberg@med.uni-heidelberg.de</email></line></lineatedText></correspondenceTo><selfCitationGroup><citation type="self" xml:id="clr2482-cit-0017">Rammelsberg P, Schroeder C, Bermejo JL, Gabbert O, Schwarz S. Short-term complications of implant-supported and combined tooth-implant-supported fixed dental prostheses. <i>Clin. Oral Impl. Res.</i> <b>24</b>, 2013, 758–762</citation></selfCitationGroup><linkGroup><link type="toTypesetVersion" href="file:CLR.CLR2482.pdf"></link></linkGroup></publicationMeta><contentMeta><titleGroup><title type="main">Short‐term complications of implant‐supported and combined tooth‐implant‐supported fixed dental prostheses</title><title type="shortAuthors">Rammelsberg et al.</title></titleGroup><creators><creator affiliationRef="#clr2482-aff-0001" corresponding="yes" creatorRole="author" xml:id="clr2482-cr-0001"><personName><givenNames>Peter</givenNames> <familyName>Rammelsberg</familyName></personName></creator><creator affiliationRef="#clr2482-aff-0001" creatorRole="author" xml:id="clr2482-cr-0005"><personName><givenNames>Stefanie</givenNames> <familyName>Schwarz</familyName></personName></creator><creator affiliationRef="#clr2482-aff-0001" creatorRole="author" xml:id="clr2482-cr-0002"><personName><givenNames>Christin</givenNames> <familyName>Schroeder</familyName></personName></creator><creator affiliationRef="#clr2482-aff-0002" creatorRole="author" xml:id="clr2482-cr-0003"><personName><givenNames>Justo L.</givenNames> <familyName>Bermejo</familyName></personName></creator><creator affiliationRef="#clr2482-aff-0001" creatorRole="author" xml:id="clr2482-cr-0004"><personName><givenNames>Olaf</givenNames> <familyName>Gabbert</familyName></personName></creator></creators><affiliationGroup><affiliation type="organization" xml:id="clr2482-aff-0001"><orgName>Department of Prosthodontics</orgName></affiliation><affiliation countryCode="DE" type="organization" xml:id="clr2482-aff-0002"><orgDiv>Institute of Medical Biometry and Informatics</orgDiv> <orgName>University of Heidelberg</orgName> <address><city>Heidelberg</city> <country>Germany</country></address></affiliation></affiliationGroup><keywordGroup type="author"><keyword xml:id="clr2482-kwd-0001">ceramic veneer</keyword><keyword xml:id="clr2482-kwd-0002">complication</keyword><keyword xml:id="clr2482-kwd-0003">dental implants</keyword><keyword xml:id="clr2482-kwd-0004">fixed dental prosthesis</keyword><keyword xml:id="clr2482-kwd-0005">metal framework</keyword><keyword xml:id="clr2482-kwd-0006">zirconia</keyword></keywordGroup><abstractGroup><abstract type="main" xml:id="clr2482-abs-0001"><title type="main">Abstract</title><section xml:id="clr2482-sec-0001"><title type="main">Objective</title><p>The objective of this clinical study was to evaluate survival and incidence of complications for metal‐ceramic and all‐ceramic implant‐supported fixed dental prostheses (<fc>FDP</fc>s) and tooth‐implant‐supported <fc>FDP</fc>s.</p></section><section xml:id="clr2482-sec-0002"><title type="main">Material and methods</title><p>One‐hundred and sixty‐six <fc>FDP</fc>s placed in 132 patients from a prospective study were selected for this retrospective analysis. Included were 91 conventional implant‐supported <fc>FDP</fc>s with implant support on both extremities, 27 implant‐supported cantilever <fc>FDP</fc>s, and 48 tooth‐implant‐supported <fc>FDP</fc>s. All restorations were veneered with ceramic. Twenty‐six <fc>FDP</fc>s had a zirconia framework and 140 had a metal framework. Kaplan–Meier analysis was performed to estimate <fc>FDP</fc> success defined as complication‐free survival and the Cox regression model was used to isolate risk factors for the most frequent complications.</p></section><section xml:id="clr2482-sec-0003"><title type="main">Results</title><p>Within a median follow‐up of 1 year and 2 months, three failures were caused by a failed implant (<i>n</i> = 2) and by extended chipping of the veneer (<i>n</i> = 1). In contrast with this low incidence of failure was a high incidence of complications including chipping (<i>n</i> = 29), loss of retention (<i>n</i> = 35), and abutment fractures (<i>n</i> = 2). Multivariate survival analysis revealed a significantly greater incidence of chipping for males and a tendency to increased incidence of chipping for zirconia‐based <fc>FDP</fc>s. The incidence of loss of retention tended to be less for tooth‐implant‐supported <fc>FDP</fc>s, for which semi‐permanent cement was the only significant risk factor, with a hazard ratio of almost 5.</p></section><section xml:id="clr2482-sec-0004"><title type="main">Conclusions</title><p>As chipping of the ceramic veneer was the most frequent complication leading to substantial aftercare, improvements of ceramic veneers are desirable for zirconia‐based and metal‐based <fc>FDP</fc>s.</p></section></abstract></abstractGroup></contentMeta><noteGroup xml:id="clr2482-ntgp-0001"><note numbered="no" xml:id="clr2482-note-0001"><b>Conflict of interest and source of funding statement:</b> The authors declare they have no conflict of interests. This study was self‐funded by the authors and their institution.</note></noteGroup></header></component></istex:document></istex:metadataXml><mods version="3.6"><titleInfo lang="en"><title>Short‐term complications of implant‐supported and combined tooth‐implant‐supported fixed dental prostheses</title></titleInfo><titleInfo type="alternative" contentType="CDATA" lang="en"><title>Short‐term complications of implant‐supported and combined tooth‐implant‐supported fixed dental prostheses</title></titleInfo><name type="personal"><namePart type="given">Peter</namePart><namePart type="family">Rammelsberg</namePart><affiliation>Department of Prosthodontics</affiliation><affiliation>Peter RammelsbergDepartment of Prosthodontics, University of HeidelbergIm Neuenheimer Feld 40069120 Heidelberg, GermanyTel.: +0049 6221 568799Fax: +0049 6221 566032e‐mail:</affiliation><affiliation>E-mail: peter_rammelsberg@med.uni-heidelberg.de</affiliation><role><roleTerm type="text">author</roleTerm></role></name><name type="personal"><namePart type="given">Stefanie</namePart><namePart type="family">Schwarz</namePart><affiliation>Department of Prosthodontics</affiliation><role><roleTerm type="text">author</roleTerm></role></name><name type="personal"><namePart type="given">Christin</namePart><namePart type="family">Schroeder</namePart><affiliation>Department of Prosthodontics</affiliation><role><roleTerm type="text">author</roleTerm></role></name><name type="personal"><namePart type="given">Justo L.</namePart><namePart type="family">Bermejo</namePart><affiliation>Institute of Medical Biometry and Informatics, University of Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany</affiliation><role><roleTerm type="text">author</roleTerm></role></name><name type="personal"><namePart type="given">Olaf</namePart><namePart type="family">Gabbert</namePart><affiliation>Department of Prosthodontics</affiliation><role><roleTerm type="text">author</roleTerm></role></name><typeOfResource>text</typeOfResource><genre type="article" displayLabel="article" authority="ISTEX" authorityURI="https://content-type.data.istex.fr" valueURI="https://content-type.data.istex.fr/ark:/67375/XTP-6N5SZHKN-D">article</genre><originInfo><publisher>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</publisher><dateIssued encoding="w3cdtf">2013-07</dateIssued><dateCreated encoding="w3cdtf">2012-04-03</dateCreated><dateValid encoding="w3cdtf">2012-03-19</dateValid><edition>Rammelsberg P, Schroeder C, Bermejo JL, Gabbert O, Schwarz S. Short-term complications of implant-supported and combined tooth-implant-supported fixed dental prostheses. Clin. Oral Impl. Res. 24, 2013, 758–762</edition><copyrightDate encoding="w3cdtf">2013</copyrightDate></originInfo><language><languageTerm type="code" authority="rfc3066">en</languageTerm><languageTerm type="code" authority="iso639-2b">eng</languageTerm></language><abstract>The objective of this clinical study was to evaluate survival and incidence of complications for metal‐ceramic and all‐ceramic implant‐supported fixed dental prostheses (FDPs) and tooth‐implant‐supported FDPs.</abstract><abstract>One‐hundred and sixty‐six FDPs placed in 132 patients from a prospective study were selected for this retrospective analysis. Included were 91 conventional implant‐supported FDPs with implant support on both extremities, 27 implant‐supported cantilever FDPs, and 48 tooth‐implant‐supported FDPs. All restorations were veneered with ceramic. Twenty‐six FDPs had a zirconia framework and 140 had a metal framework. Kaplan–Meier analysis was performed to estimate FDP success defined as complication‐free survival and the Cox regression model was used to isolate risk factors for the most frequent complications.</abstract><abstract>Within a median follow‐up of 1 year and 2 months, three failures were caused by a failed implant (n = 2) and by extended chipping of the veneer (n = 1). In contrast with this low incidence of failure was a high incidence of complications including chipping (n = 29), loss of retention (n = 35), and abutment fractures (n = 2). Multivariate survival analysis revealed a significantly greater incidence of chipping for males and a tendency to increased incidence of chipping for zirconia‐based FDPs. The incidence of loss of retention tended to be less for tooth‐implant‐supported FDPs, for which semi‐permanent cement was the only significant risk factor, with a hazard ratio of almost 5.</abstract><abstract>As chipping of the ceramic veneer was the most frequent complication leading to substantial aftercare, improvements of ceramic veneers are desirable for zirconia‐based and metal‐based FDPs.</abstract><subject><genre>keywords</genre><topic>ceramic veneer</topic><topic>complication</topic><topic>dental implants</topic><topic>fixed dental prosthesis</topic><topic>metal framework</topic><topic>zirconia</topic></subject><relatedItem type="host"><titleInfo><title>Clinical Oral Implants Research</title></titleInfo><titleInfo type="abbreviated"><title>Clin. Oral Impl. Res.</title></titleInfo><genre type="journal" authority="ISTEX" authorityURI="https://publication-type.data.istex.fr" valueURI="https://publication-type.data.istex.fr/ark:/67375/JMC-0GLKJH51-B">journal</genre><subject><genre>article-category</genre><topic>Original Research Article</topic></subject><identifier type="ISSN">0905-7161</identifier><identifier type="eISSN">1600-0501</identifier><identifier type="DOI">10.1111/(ISSN)1600-0501</identifier><identifier type="PublisherID">CLR</identifier><part><date>2013</date><detail type="volume"><caption>vol.</caption><number>24</number></detail><detail type="issue"><caption>no.</caption><number>7</number></detail><extent unit="pages"><start>758</start><end>762</end><total>5</total></extent></part></relatedItem><identifier type="istex">D9AE1B998063D6898C53DCF42B9B46578CAC395F</identifier><identifier type="ark">ark:/67375/WNG-CC1JGN5J-P</identifier><identifier type="DOI">10.1111/j.1600-0501.2012.02482.x</identifier><identifier type="ArticleID">CLR2482</identifier><accessCondition type="use and reproduction" contentType="copyright">Copyright © 2013 John Wiley & Sons A/S© 2012 John Wiley & Sons A/S</accessCondition><recordInfo><recordContentSource authority="ISTEX" authorityURI="https://loaded-corpus.data.istex.fr" valueURI="https://loaded-corpus.data.istex.fr/ark:/67375/XBH-L0C46X92-X">wiley</recordContentSource></recordInfo></mods><json:item><extension>json</extension><original>false</original><mimetype>application/json</mimetype><uri>https://api.istex.fr/document/D9AE1B998063D6898C53DCF42B9B46578CAC395F/metadata/json</uri></json:item></metadata><serie></serie></istex></record>Pour manipuler ce document sous Unix (Dilib)
EXPLOR_STEP=$WICRI_ROOT/Wicri/Santé/explor/EdenteV2/Data/Istex/Corpus
HfdSelect -h $EXPLOR_STEP/biblio.hfd -nk 006B97 | SxmlIndent | more
Ou
HfdSelect -h $EXPLOR_AREA/Data/Istex/Corpus/biblio.hfd -nk 006B97 | SxmlIndent | more
Pour mettre un lien sur cette page dans le réseau Wicri
{{Explor lien
|wiki= Wicri/Santé
|area= EdenteV2
|flux= Istex
|étape= Corpus
|type= RBID
|clé= ISTEX:D9AE1B998063D6898C53DCF42B9B46578CAC395F
|texte= Short‐term complications of implant‐supported and combined tooth‐implant‐supported fixed dental prostheses
}}
| This area was generated with Dilib version V0.6.32. |  |