Laser‐Welded Titanium Frameworks Supported by Implants in the Partially Edentulous Mandible: A 10‐Year Comparative Follow‐Up Study
Identifieur interne : 006A51 ( Istex/Corpus ); précédent : 006A50; suivant : 006A52Laser‐Welded Titanium Frameworks Supported by Implants in the Partially Edentulous Mandible: A 10‐Year Comparative Follow‐Up Study
Auteurs : Anders Örtorp ; Torsten JemtSource :
- Clinical Implant Dentistry and Related Research [ 1523-0899 ] ; 2008-09.
English descriptors
- KwdEn :
- Abutment, Bone gain, Bone level, Bone loss, Cast gold alloy frameworks, Clin, Clin implant dent relat, Clin periodontol, Clinical dentistry, Clinical experiences, Clinical implant dentistry, Control group, Control groups, Cumulative survival rate, Dentistry, Denture, Different patients, Edentulous, Edentulous mandible, Edentulous patient, Fracture, Framework, General health problems, Health service, Implant, Implant failures, Implant placement, Implant treatment, Inclusion period, Individual implants, Jemt, Lekholm, Mandible, Marginal bone level, Marginal bone levels, Marginal bone loss, Maxillofac, Nobel biocare, Oral maxillofac implants, Original prostheses, Osseointegration, Overall implant, Partial dentures, Partial edentulism, Partial prostheses, Porcelain, Present study, Prospective study, Prosthesis, Prosthesis placement, Prosthet dent, Prosthetic, Radiographic, Routine basis, Severe fractures, Short implants, Statistical comparison, Test group, Tissueintegrated prostheses, Titanium, Titanium frameworks, Veneer, Zarb.
- Teeft :
- Abutment, Bone gain, Bone level, Bone loss, Cast gold alloy frameworks, Clin, Clin implant dent relat, Clin periodontol, Clinical dentistry, Clinical experiences, Clinical implant dentistry, Control group, Control groups, Cumulative survival rate, Dentistry, Denture, Different patients, Edentulous, Edentulous mandible, Edentulous patient, Fracture, Framework, General health problems, Health service, Implant, Implant failures, Implant placement, Implant treatment, Inclusion period, Individual implants, Jemt, Lekholm, Mandible, Marginal bone level, Marginal bone levels, Marginal bone loss, Maxillofac, Nobel biocare, Oral maxillofac implants, Original prostheses, Osseointegration, Overall implant, Partial dentures, Partial edentulism, Partial prostheses, Porcelain, Present study, Prospective study, Prosthesis, Prosthesis placement, Prosthet dent, Prosthetic, Radiographic, Routine basis, Severe fractures, Short implants, Statistical comparison, Test group, Tissueintegrated prostheses, Titanium, Titanium frameworks, Veneer, Zarb.
Abstract
Background: Comparative long‐term knowledge of different framework materials in the partially edentulous implant patient is not available.
Url:
DOI: 10.1111/j.1708-8208.2007.00073.x
Links to Exploration step
ISTEX:D69033F116AB9A4C7EE809D4BC183935EAD810BFLe document en format XML
<record><TEI wicri:istexFullTextTei="biblStruct"><teiHeader><fileDesc><titleStmt><title xml:lang="en">Laser‐Welded Titanium Frameworks Supported by Implants in the Partially Edentulous Mandible: A 10‐Year Comparative Follow‐Up Study</title><author><name sortKey="Ortorp, Anders" sort="Ortorp, Anders" uniqKey="Ortorp A" first="Anders" last="Örtorp">Anders Örtorp</name><affiliation><mods:affiliation>Prosthodontist, The Brånemark Clinic, Public Dental Health Service, Göteborg, Sweden;</mods:affiliation></affiliation><affiliation><mods:affiliation>E-mail: anders.ortorp@vgregion.se</mods:affiliation></affiliation></author><author><name sortKey="Jemt, Torsten" sort="Jemt, Torsten" uniqKey="Jemt T" first="Torsten" last="Jemt">Torsten Jemt</name><affiliation><mods:affiliation>chairman, The Brånemark Clinic, Public Dental Health Service, Göteborg, Sweden, and professor, Department Prosthetic Dentistry/Dental Material Science, Institute of Odontology, the Sahlgrenska Academy, Göteborg, Sweden</mods:affiliation></affiliation></author></titleStmt><publicationStmt><idno type="wicri:source">ISTEX</idno><idno type="RBID">ISTEX:D69033F116AB9A4C7EE809D4BC183935EAD810BF</idno><date when="2008" year="2008">2008</date><idno type="doi">10.1111/j.1708-8208.2007.00073.x</idno><idno type="url">https://api.istex.fr/document/D69033F116AB9A4C7EE809D4BC183935EAD810BF/fulltext/pdf</idno><idno type="wicri:Area/Istex/Corpus">006A51</idno><idno type="wicri:explorRef" wicri:stream="Istex" wicri:step="Corpus" wicri:corpus="ISTEX">006A51</idno></publicationStmt><sourceDesc><biblStruct><analytic><title level="a" type="main">Laser‐Welded Titanium Frameworks Supported by Implants in the Partially Edentulous Mandible: A 10‐Year Comparative Follow‐Up Study</title><author><name sortKey="Ortorp, Anders" sort="Ortorp, Anders" uniqKey="Ortorp A" first="Anders" last="Örtorp">Anders Örtorp</name><affiliation><mods:affiliation>Prosthodontist, The Brånemark Clinic, Public Dental Health Service, Göteborg, Sweden;</mods:affiliation></affiliation><affiliation><mods:affiliation>E-mail: anders.ortorp@vgregion.se</mods:affiliation></affiliation></author><author><name sortKey="Jemt, Torsten" sort="Jemt, Torsten" uniqKey="Jemt T" first="Torsten" last="Jemt">Torsten Jemt</name><affiliation><mods:affiliation>chairman, The Brånemark Clinic, Public Dental Health Service, Göteborg, Sweden, and professor, Department Prosthetic Dentistry/Dental Material Science, Institute of Odontology, the Sahlgrenska Academy, Göteborg, Sweden</mods:affiliation></affiliation></author></analytic><monogr></monogr><series><title level="j" type="main">Clinical Implant Dentistry and Related Research</title><title level="j" type="alt">CLINICAL IMPLANT DENTISTRY RELATED RESEARCH</title><idno type="ISSN">1523-0899</idno><idno type="eISSN">1708-8208</idno><imprint><biblScope unit="vol">10</biblScope><biblScope unit="issue">3</biblScope><biblScope unit="page" from="128">128</biblScope><biblScope unit="page" to="139">139</biblScope><biblScope unit="page-count">12</biblScope><publisher>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</publisher><pubPlace>Oxford, UK</pubPlace><date type="published" when="2008-09">2008-09</date></imprint><idno type="ISSN">1523-0899</idno></series></biblStruct></sourceDesc><seriesStmt><idno type="ISSN">1523-0899</idno></seriesStmt></fileDesc><profileDesc><textClass><keywords scheme="KwdEn" xml:lang="en"><term>Abutment</term><term>Bone gain</term><term>Bone level</term><term>Bone loss</term><term>Cast gold alloy frameworks</term><term>Clin</term><term>Clin implant dent relat</term><term>Clin periodontol</term><term>Clinical dentistry</term><term>Clinical experiences</term><term>Clinical implant dentistry</term><term>Control group</term><term>Control groups</term><term>Cumulative survival rate</term><term>Dentistry</term><term>Denture</term><term>Different patients</term><term>Edentulous</term><term>Edentulous mandible</term><term>Edentulous patient</term><term>Fracture</term><term>Framework</term><term>General health problems</term><term>Health service</term><term>Implant</term><term>Implant failures</term><term>Implant placement</term><term>Implant treatment</term><term>Inclusion period</term><term>Individual implants</term><term>Jemt</term><term>Lekholm</term><term>Mandible</term><term>Marginal bone level</term><term>Marginal bone levels</term><term>Marginal bone loss</term><term>Maxillofac</term><term>Nobel biocare</term><term>Oral maxillofac implants</term><term>Original prostheses</term><term>Osseointegration</term><term>Overall implant</term><term>Partial dentures</term><term>Partial edentulism</term><term>Partial prostheses</term><term>Porcelain</term><term>Present study</term><term>Prospective study</term><term>Prosthesis</term><term>Prosthesis placement</term><term>Prosthet dent</term><term>Prosthetic</term><term>Radiographic</term><term>Routine basis</term><term>Severe fractures</term><term>Short implants</term><term>Statistical comparison</term><term>Test group</term><term>Tissueintegrated prostheses</term><term>Titanium</term><term>Titanium frameworks</term><term>Veneer</term><term>Zarb</term></keywords><keywords scheme="Teeft" xml:lang="en"><term>Abutment</term><term>Bone gain</term><term>Bone level</term><term>Bone loss</term><term>Cast gold alloy frameworks</term><term>Clin</term><term>Clin implant dent relat</term><term>Clin periodontol</term><term>Clinical dentistry</term><term>Clinical experiences</term><term>Clinical implant dentistry</term><term>Control group</term><term>Control groups</term><term>Cumulative survival rate</term><term>Dentistry</term><term>Denture</term><term>Different patients</term><term>Edentulous</term><term>Edentulous mandible</term><term>Edentulous patient</term><term>Fracture</term><term>Framework</term><term>General health problems</term><term>Health service</term><term>Implant</term><term>Implant failures</term><term>Implant placement</term><term>Implant treatment</term><term>Inclusion period</term><term>Individual implants</term><term>Jemt</term><term>Lekholm</term><term>Mandible</term><term>Marginal bone level</term><term>Marginal bone levels</term><term>Marginal bone loss</term><term>Maxillofac</term><term>Nobel biocare</term><term>Oral maxillofac implants</term><term>Original prostheses</term><term>Osseointegration</term><term>Overall implant</term><term>Partial dentures</term><term>Partial edentulism</term><term>Partial prostheses</term><term>Porcelain</term><term>Present study</term><term>Prospective study</term><term>Prosthesis</term><term>Prosthesis placement</term><term>Prosthet dent</term><term>Prosthetic</term><term>Radiographic</term><term>Routine basis</term><term>Severe fractures</term><term>Short implants</term><term>Statistical comparison</term><term>Test group</term><term>Tissueintegrated prostheses</term><term>Titanium</term><term>Titanium frameworks</term><term>Veneer</term><term>Zarb</term></keywords></textClass></profileDesc></teiHeader><front><div type="abstract">Background: Comparative long‐term knowledge of different framework materials in the partially edentulous implant patient is not available.</div></front></TEI><istex><corpusName>wiley</corpusName><keywords><teeft><json:string>prosthesis</json:string><json:string>implant</json:string><json:string>test group</json:string><json:string>titanium frameworks</json:string><json:string>control group</json:string><json:string>mandible</json:string><json:string>edentulous</json:string><json:string>bone loss</json:string><json:string>edentulous mandible</json:string><json:string>clin</json:string><json:string>radiographic</json:string><json:string>control groups</json:string><json:string>jemt</json:string><json:string>titanium</json:string><json:string>abutment</json:string><json:string>fracture</json:string><json:string>lekholm</json:string><json:string>zarb</json:string><json:string>maxillofac</json:string><json:string>prosthetic</json:string><json:string>oral maxillofac implants</json:string><json:string>denture</json:string><json:string>osseointegration</json:string><json:string>veneer</json:string><json:string>dentistry</json:string><json:string>partial prostheses</json:string><json:string>implant failures</json:string><json:string>marginal bone loss</json:string><json:string>clinical implant dentistry</json:string><json:string>partial dentures</json:string><json:string>prosthesis placement</json:string><json:string>clinical dentistry</json:string><json:string>porcelain</json:string><json:string>short implants</json:string><json:string>original prostheses</json:string><json:string>nobel biocare</json:string><json:string>implant treatment</json:string><json:string>statistical comparison</json:string><json:string>edentulous patient</json:string><json:string>clin implant dent relat</json:string><json:string>tissueintegrated prostheses</json:string><json:string>bone gain</json:string><json:string>marginal bone level</json:string><json:string>bone level</json:string><json:string>different patients</json:string><json:string>individual implants</json:string><json:string>marginal bone levels</json:string><json:string>cast gold alloy frameworks</json:string><json:string>inclusion period</json:string><json:string>severe fractures</json:string><json:string>overall implant</json:string><json:string>implant placement</json:string><json:string>health service</json:string><json:string>prosthet dent</json:string><json:string>partial edentulism</json:string><json:string>present study</json:string><json:string>clinical experiences</json:string><json:string>routine basis</json:string><json:string>general health problems</json:string><json:string>prospective study</json:string><json:string>clin periodontol</json:string><json:string>cumulative survival rate</json:string><json:string>framework</json:string><json:string>dent</json:string><json:string>alloy</json:string></teeft></keywords><author><json:item><name>Anders Örtorp DDS, PhD/Odont Dr</name><affiliations><json:string>Prosthodontist, The Brånemark Clinic, Public Dental Health Service, Göteborg, Sweden;</json:string><json:string>E-mail: anders.ortorp@vgregion.se</json:string></affiliations></json:item><json:item><name>Torsten Jemt DDS, PhD/Odont Dr</name><affiliations><json:string>chairman, The Brånemark Clinic, Public Dental Health Service, Göteborg, Sweden, and professor, Department Prosthetic Dentistry/Dental Material Science, Institute of Odontology, the Sahlgrenska Academy, Göteborg, Sweden</json:string></affiliations></json:item></author><subject><json:item><lang><json:string>eng</json:string></lang><value>complications</value></json:item><json:item><lang><json:string>eng</json:string></lang><value>fixed prostheses</value></json:item><json:item><lang><json:string>eng</json:string></lang><value>framework design</value></json:item><json:item><lang><json:string>eng</json:string></lang><value>implants</value></json:item><json:item><lang><json:string>eng</json:string></lang><value>laser‐welding</value></json:item><json:item><lang><json:string>eng</json:string></lang><value>veneering material</value></json:item></subject><articleId><json:string>CID073</json:string></articleId><arkIstex>ark:/67375/WNG-G323BB3N-T</arkIstex><language><json:string>eng</json:string></language><originalGenre><json:string>article</json:string></originalGenre><abstract>Background: Comparative long‐term knowledge of different framework materials in the partially edentulous implant patient is not available.</abstract><qualityIndicators><score>7.204</score><pdfWordCount>5439</pdfWordCount><pdfCharCount>35992</pdfCharCount><pdfVersion>1.2</pdfVersion><pdfPageCount>12</pdfPageCount><pdfPageSize>585 x 783 pts</pdfPageSize><refBibsNative>true</refBibsNative><abstractWordCount>17</abstractWordCount><abstractCharCount>138</abstractCharCount><keywordCount>6</keywordCount></qualityIndicators><title>Laser‐Welded Titanium Frameworks Supported by Implants in the Partially Edentulous Mandible: A 10‐Year Comparative Follow‐Up Study</title><pmid><json:string>18218053</json:string></pmid><genre><json:string>article</json:string></genre><host><title>Clinical Implant Dentistry and Related Research</title><language><json:string>unknown</json:string></language><doi><json:string>10.1111/(ISSN)1708-8208</json:string></doi><issn><json:string>1523-0899</json:string></issn><eissn><json:string>1708-8208</json:string></eissn><publisherId><json:string>CID</json:string></publisherId><volume>10</volume><issue>3</issue><pages><first>128</first><last>139</last><total>12</total></pages><genre><json:string>journal</json:string></genre></host><namedEntities><unitex><date><json:string>80s</json:string><json:string>from November 1990 to September 1993</json:string><json:string>1</json:string><json:string>2008</json:string></date><geogName></geogName><orgName><json:string>Wiley Periodicals, Inc.</json:string><json:string>Related Research, Volume</json:string></orgName><orgName_funder></orgName_funder><orgName_provider></orgName_provider><persName><json:string>Oskar Räntfors</json:string><json:string>Marianne Spångberg</json:string><json:string>The</json:string><json:string>Anders Örtorp</json:string><json:string>Lost</json:string><json:string>To</json:string></persName><placeName><json:string>Germany</json:string><json:string>Sweden</json:string></placeName><ref_url></ref_url><ref_bibl></ref_bibl><bibl></bibl></unitex></namedEntities><ark><json:string>ark:/67375/WNG-G323BB3N-T</json:string></ark><categories><wos><json:string>1 - science</json:string><json:string>2 - dentistry, oral surgery & medicine</json:string></wos><scienceMetrix><json:string>1 - health sciences</json:string><json:string>2 - clinical medicine</json:string><json:string>3 - dentistry</json:string></scienceMetrix><scopus><json:string>1 - Health Sciences</json:string><json:string>2 - Dentistry</json:string><json:string>3 - General Dentistry</json:string><json:string>1 - Health Sciences</json:string><json:string>2 - Dentistry</json:string><json:string>3 - Oral Surgery</json:string></scopus></categories><publicationDate>2008</publicationDate><copyrightDate>2008</copyrightDate><doi><json:string>10.1111/j.1708-8208.2007.00073.x</json:string></doi><id>D69033F116AB9A4C7EE809D4BC183935EAD810BF</id><score>1</score><fulltext><json:item><extension>pdf</extension><original>true</original><mimetype>application/pdf</mimetype><uri>https://api.istex.fr/document/D69033F116AB9A4C7EE809D4BC183935EAD810BF/fulltext/pdf</uri></json:item><json:item><extension>zip</extension><original>false</original><mimetype>application/zip</mimetype><uri>https://api.istex.fr/document/D69033F116AB9A4C7EE809D4BC183935EAD810BF/fulltext/zip</uri></json:item><istex:fulltextTEI uri="https://api.istex.fr/document/D69033F116AB9A4C7EE809D4BC183935EAD810BF/fulltext/tei"><teiHeader><fileDesc><titleStmt><title level="a" type="main">Laser‐Welded Titanium Frameworks Supported by Implants in the Partially Edentulous Mandible: A 10‐Year Comparative Follow‐Up Study</title></titleStmt><publicationStmt><authority>ISTEX</authority><publisher>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</publisher><pubPlace>Oxford, UK</pubPlace><availability><licence>© 2008, Copyright the Authors. Journal Compilation © 2008, Wiley Periodicals, Inc.</licence></availability><date type="published" when="2008-09"></date></publicationStmt><notesStmt><note type="content-type" subtype="article" source="article" scheme="https://content-type.data.istex.fr/ark:/67375/XTP-6N5SZHKN-D">article</note><note type="publication-type" subtype="journal" scheme="https://publication-type.data.istex.fr/ark:/67375/JMC-0GLKJH51-B">journal</note></notesStmt><sourceDesc><biblStruct type="article"><analytic><title level="a" type="main">Laser‐Welded Titanium Frameworks Supported by Implants in the Partially Edentulous Mandible: A 10‐Year Comparative Follow‐Up Study</title><title level="a" type="short">Titanium Frameworks in the Partially Edentulous Mandible</title><author xml:id="author-0000" role="corresp"><persName><forename type="first">Anders</forename><surname>Örtorp</surname><roleName type="degree">DDS, PhD/Odont Dr</roleName></persName><affiliation>Prosthodontist, The Brånemark Clinic, Public Dental Health Service, Göteborg, Sweden;<address><country key="SE"></country></address></affiliation><affiliation>Dr. Anders Örtorp, The Brånemark Clinic, Public Dental Health Service, Medicinaregatan 12 C, S – 413 90 Göteborg, Sweden; e‐mail: anders.ortorp@vgregion.se</affiliation></author><author xml:id="author-0001"><persName><forename type="first">Torsten</forename><surname>Jemt</surname><roleName type="degree">DDS, PhD/Odont Dr</roleName></persName><affiliation>chairman, The Brånemark Clinic, Public Dental Health Service, Göteborg, Sweden, and professor, Department Prosthetic Dentistry/Dental Material Science, Institute of Odontology, the Sahlgrenska Academy, Göteborg, Sweden<address><country key="SE"></country></address></affiliation></author><idno type="istex">D69033F116AB9A4C7EE809D4BC183935EAD810BF</idno><idno type="ark">ark:/67375/WNG-G323BB3N-T</idno><idno type="DOI">10.1111/j.1708-8208.2007.00073.x</idno><idno type="unit">CID073</idno><idno type="toTypesetVersion">file:CID.CID073.pdf</idno></analytic><monogr><title level="j" type="main">Clinical Implant Dentistry and Related Research</title><title level="j" type="alt">CLINICAL IMPLANT DENTISTRY RELATED RESEARCH</title><idno type="pISSN">1523-0899</idno><idno type="eISSN">1708-8208</idno><idno type="book-DOI">10.1111/(ISSN)1708-8208</idno><idno type="book-part-DOI">10.1111/cid.2008.10.issue-3</idno><idno type="product">CID</idno><idno type="publisherDivision">ST</idno><imprint><biblScope unit="vol">10</biblScope><biblScope unit="issue">3</biblScope><biblScope unit="page" from="128">128</biblScope><biblScope unit="page" to="139">139</biblScope><biblScope unit="page-count">12</biblScope><publisher>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</publisher><pubPlace>Oxford, UK</pubPlace><date type="published" when="2008-09"></date></imprint></monogr></biblStruct></sourceDesc></fileDesc><profileDesc><abstract xml:lang="en" style="main"><head>ABSTRACT</head><p><hi rend="bold">Background:</hi> Comparative long‐term knowledge of different framework materials in the partially edentulous implant patient is not available.</p><p><hi rend="bold">Purpose:</hi> To report and compare 10‐year data on free‐standing implant‐supported partial prostheses with laser‐welded titanium (test) and conventional gold alloy (control) frameworks.</p><p><hi rend="bold">Materials and Methods:</hi> Altogether, 52 partially edentulous patients were consecutively provided with laser‐welded prostheses (<hi rend="italic">n</hi> = 60) in the partially edentulous lower jaw (test group). A control group of 52 randomly selected patients with gold alloy castings (<hi rend="italic">n</hi> = 60) was used for comparison. Clinical and radiographic 10‐year data were retrospectively collected and evaluated for both groups.</p><p><hi rend="bold">Results:</hi> The overall 10‐year implant cumulative survival rate (CSR) was 93.0% (loaded implants, 96.4%), with a 10‐year implant CSR of 91.5 and 94.7% for test and control implants, respectively (<hi rend="italic">p</hi> > .05). Out of a total of 22 lost implants, 17 implants (77.3%) were shorter than 10 mm. The overall 10‐year prosthesis CSR was 93.7%, with a corresponding 10‐year CSR of 88.4 and 100% for test and control groups, respectively (<hi rend="italic">p</hi> < .05). Average 10‐year bone loss was 0.46 mm (SD 0.47) and 0.69 mm (SD 0.53) for the test and control groups (<hi rend="italic">p</hi> < .001), respectively. Only 1% of the implants had >3 mm accumulated bone loss after 10 years. Altogether, 10 of the prostheses in both groups had implant component mechanical problems (8.3%). None of the frameworks or implants fractured, but more fractures of porcelain veneers were observed in the test group (<hi rend="italic">p</hi> < .05).</p><p><hi rend="bold">Conclusion:</hi> The protocol of implant treatment in the partially edentulous jaw functioned well during 10 years, although prosthodontic maintenance was required. However, laser‐welded titanium frameworks presented more problems as compared with gold alloy frameworks. More loaded implants were lost (<hi rend="italic">p</hi> < .05), and higher incidence of porcelain chipping was noted in the test group (<hi rend="italic">p</hi> < .05). However, bone loss was on an average lower for the test group during the 10 years of follow‐up (<hi rend="italic">p</hi> < .001).</p></abstract><textClass><keywords xml:lang="en"><term xml:id="k1">complications</term><term xml:id="k2">fixed prostheses</term><term xml:id="k3">framework design</term><term xml:id="k4">implants</term><term xml:id="k5">laser‐welding</term><term xml:id="k6">veneering material</term></keywords><keywords rend="tocHeading1"><term>ARTICLES</term></keywords></textClass><langUsage><language ident="en"></language></langUsage></profileDesc></teiHeader></istex:fulltextTEI><json:item><extension>txt</extension><original>false</original><mimetype>text/plain</mimetype><uri>https://api.istex.fr/document/D69033F116AB9A4C7EE809D4BC183935EAD810BF/fulltext/txt</uri></json:item></fulltext><metadata><istex:metadataXml wicri:clean="Wiley, elements deleted: body"><istex:xmlDeclaration>version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" standalone="yes"</istex:xmlDeclaration><istex:document><component version="2.0" type="serialArticle" xml:lang="en"><header><publicationMeta level="product"><publisherInfo><publisherName>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</publisherName><publisherLoc>Oxford, UK</publisherLoc></publisherInfo><doi origin="wiley" registered="yes">10.1111/(ISSN)1708-8208</doi><issn type="print">1523-0899</issn><issn type="electronic">1708-8208</issn><idGroup><id type="product" value="CID"></id><id type="publisherDivision" value="ST"></id></idGroup><titleGroup><title type="main" sort="CLINICAL IMPLANT DENTISTRY RELATED RESEARCH">Clinical Implant Dentistry and Related Research</title></titleGroup></publicationMeta><publicationMeta level="part" position="09003"><doi origin="wiley">10.1111/cid.2008.10.issue-3</doi><numberingGroup><numbering type="journalVolume" number="10">10</numbering><numbering type="journalIssue" number="3">3</numbering></numberingGroup><coverDate startDate="2008-09">September 2008</coverDate></publicationMeta><publicationMeta level="unit" type="article" position="2" status="forIssue"><doi origin="wiley">10.1111/j.1708-8208.2007.00073.x</doi><idGroup><id type="unit" value="CID073"></id></idGroup><countGroup><count type="pageTotal" number="12"></count></countGroup><titleGroup><title type="tocHeading1">ARTICLES</title></titleGroup><copyright>© 2008, Copyright the Authors. Journal Compilation © 2008, Wiley Periodicals, Inc.</copyright><eventGroup><event type="firstOnline" date="2008-01-24"></event><event type="publishedOnlineFinalForm" date="2008-07-29"></event><event type="xmlConverted" agent="Converter:BPG_TO_WML3G version:2.3.5 mode:FullText source:FullText result:FullText" date="2010-04-08"></event><event type="xmlConverted" agent="Converter:WILEY_ML3G_TO_WILEY_ML3GV2 version:3.8.8" date="2014-01-15"></event><event type="xmlConverted" agent="Converter:WML3G_To_WML3G version:4.1.7 mode:FullText,remove_FC" date="2014-10-16"></event></eventGroup><numberingGroup><numbering type="pageFirst" number="128">128</numbering><numbering type="pageLast" number="139">139</numbering></numberingGroup><correspondenceTo>Dr. Anders Örtorp, The Brånemark Clinic, Public Dental Health Service, Medicinaregatan 12 C, S – 413 90 Göteborg, Sweden; e‐mail: <email>anders.ortorp@vgregion.se</email></correspondenceTo><linkGroup><link type="toTypesetVersion" href="file:CID.CID073.pdf"></link></linkGroup></publicationMeta><contentMeta><countGroup><count type="figureTotal" number="4"></count><count type="tableTotal" number="8"></count><count type="formulaTotal" number="0"></count><count type="referenceTotal" number="44"></count><count type="wordTotal" number="6639"></count><count type="linksPubMed" number="0"></count><count type="linksCrossRef" number="0"></count></countGroup><titleGroup><title type="main">Laser‐Welded Titanium Frameworks Supported by Implants in the Partially Edentulous Mandible: A 10‐Year Comparative Follow‐Up Study</title><title type="shortAuthors">Clinical Implant Dentistry and Related Research, Volume *, Number *</title><title type="short">Titanium Frameworks in the Partially Edentulous Mandible</title></titleGroup><creators><creator creatorRole="author" xml:id="cr1" affiliationRef="#a1" corresponding="yes"><personName><givenNames>Anders</givenNames><familyName>Örtorp</familyName><degrees>DDS, PhD/Odont Dr</degrees></personName></creator><creator creatorRole="author" xml:id="cr2" affiliationRef="#a2"><personName><givenNames>Torsten</givenNames><familyName>Jemt</familyName><degrees>DDS, PhD/Odont Dr</degrees></personName></creator></creators><affiliationGroup><affiliation xml:id="a1" countryCode="SE"><unparsedAffiliation>Prosthodontist, The Brånemark Clinic, Public Dental Health Service, Göteborg, Sweden;</unparsedAffiliation></affiliation><affiliation xml:id="a2" countryCode="SE"><unparsedAffiliation>chairman, The Brånemark Clinic, Public Dental Health Service, Göteborg, Sweden, and professor, Department Prosthetic Dentistry/Dental Material Science, Institute of Odontology, the Sahlgrenska Academy, Göteborg, Sweden</unparsedAffiliation></affiliation></affiliationGroup><keywordGroup xml:lang="en"><keyword xml:id="k1">complications</keyword><keyword xml:id="k2">fixed prostheses</keyword><keyword xml:id="k3">framework design</keyword><keyword xml:id="k4">implants</keyword><keyword xml:id="k5">laser‐welding</keyword><keyword xml:id="k6">veneering material</keyword></keywordGroup><abstractGroup><abstract type="main" xml:lang="en"><title type="main">ABSTRACT</title><p><b>Background:</b> Comparative long‐term knowledge of different framework materials in the partially edentulous implant patient is not available.</p><p><b>Purpose:</b> To report and compare 10‐year data on free‐standing implant‐supported partial prostheses with laser‐welded titanium (test) and conventional gold alloy (control) frameworks.</p><p><b>Materials and Methods:</b> Altogether, 52 partially edentulous patients were consecutively provided with laser‐welded prostheses (<i>n</i> = 60) in the partially edentulous lower jaw (test group). A control group of 52 randomly selected patients with gold alloy castings (<i>n</i> = 60) was used for comparison. Clinical and radiographic 10‐year data were retrospectively collected and evaluated for both groups.</p><p><b>Results:</b> The overall 10‐year implant cumulative survival rate (CSR) was 93.0% (loaded implants, 96.4%), with a 10‐year implant CSR of 91.5 and 94.7% for test and control implants, respectively (<i>p</i> > .05). Out of a total of 22 lost implants, 17 implants (77.3%) were shorter than 10 mm. The overall 10‐year prosthesis CSR was 93.7%, with a corresponding 10‐year CSR of 88.4 and 100% for test and control groups, respectively (<i>p</i> < .05). Average 10‐year bone loss was 0.46 mm (SD 0.47) and 0.69 mm (SD 0.53) for the test and control groups (<i>p</i> < .001), respectively. Only 1% of the implants had >3 mm accumulated bone loss after 10 years. Altogether, 10 of the prostheses in both groups had implant component mechanical problems (8.3%). None of the frameworks or implants fractured, but more fractures of porcelain veneers were observed in the test group (<i>p</i> < .05).</p><p><b>Conclusion:</b> The protocol of implant treatment in the partially edentulous jaw functioned well during 10 years, although prosthodontic maintenance was required. However, laser‐welded titanium frameworks presented more problems as compared with gold alloy frameworks. More loaded implants were lost (<i>p</i> < .05), and higher incidence of porcelain chipping was noted in the test group (<i>p</i> < .05). However, bone loss was on an average lower for the test group during the 10 years of follow‐up (<i>p</i> < .001).</p></abstract></abstractGroup></contentMeta></header></component></istex:document></istex:metadataXml><mods version="3.6"><titleInfo lang="en"><title>Laser‐Welded Titanium Frameworks Supported by Implants in the Partially Edentulous Mandible: A 10‐Year Comparative Follow‐Up Study</title></titleInfo><titleInfo type="abbreviated" lang="en"><title>Titanium Frameworks in the Partially Edentulous Mandible</title></titleInfo><titleInfo type="alternative" contentType="CDATA" lang="en"><title>Laser‐Welded Titanium Frameworks Supported by Implants in the Partially Edentulous Mandible: A 10‐Year Comparative Follow‐Up Study</title></titleInfo><name type="personal"><namePart type="given">Anders</namePart><namePart type="family">Örtorp</namePart><namePart type="termsOfAddress">DDS, PhD/Odont Dr</namePart><affiliation>Prosthodontist, The Brånemark Clinic, Public Dental Health Service, Göteborg, Sweden;</affiliation><affiliation>E-mail: anders.ortorp@vgregion.se</affiliation><role><roleTerm type="text">author</roleTerm></role></name><name type="personal"><namePart type="given">Torsten</namePart><namePart type="family">Jemt</namePart><namePart type="termsOfAddress">DDS, PhD/Odont Dr</namePart><affiliation>chairman, The Brånemark Clinic, Public Dental Health Service, Göteborg, Sweden, and professor, Department Prosthetic Dentistry/Dental Material Science, Institute of Odontology, the Sahlgrenska Academy, Göteborg, Sweden</affiliation><role><roleTerm type="text">author</roleTerm></role></name><typeOfResource>text</typeOfResource><genre type="article" displayLabel="article" authority="ISTEX" authorityURI="https://content-type.data.istex.fr" valueURI="https://content-type.data.istex.fr/ark:/67375/XTP-6N5SZHKN-D">article</genre><originInfo><publisher>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</publisher><place><placeTerm type="text">Oxford, UK</placeTerm></place><dateIssued encoding="w3cdtf">2008-09</dateIssued><copyrightDate encoding="w3cdtf">2008</copyrightDate></originInfo><language><languageTerm type="code" authority="rfc3066">en</languageTerm><languageTerm type="code" authority="iso639-2b">eng</languageTerm></language><physicalDescription><extent unit="figures">4</extent><extent unit="tables">8</extent><extent unit="formulas">0</extent><extent unit="references">44</extent><extent unit="linksCrossRef">0</extent><extent unit="words">6639</extent></physicalDescription><abstract>Background: Comparative long‐term knowledge of different framework materials in the partially edentulous implant patient is not available.</abstract><abstract>Purpose: To report and compare 10‐year data on free‐standing implant‐supported partial prostheses with laser‐welded titanium (test) and conventional gold alloy (control) frameworks.</abstract><abstract>Materials and Methods: Altogether, 52 partially edentulous patients were consecutively provided with laser‐welded prostheses (n = 60) in the partially edentulous lower jaw (test group). A control group of 52 randomly selected patients with gold alloy castings (n = 60) was used for comparison. Clinical and radiographic 10‐year data were retrospectively collected and evaluated for both groups.</abstract><abstract>Results: The overall 10‐year implant cumulative survival rate (CSR) was 93.0% (loaded implants, 96.4%), with a 10‐year implant CSR of 91.5 and 94.7% for test and control implants, respectively (p > .05). Out of a total of 22 lost implants, 17 implants (77.3%) were shorter than 10 mm. The overall 10‐year prosthesis CSR was 93.7%, with a corresponding 10‐year CSR of 88.4 and 100% for test and control groups, respectively (p < .05). Average 10‐year bone loss was 0.46 mm (SD 0.47) and 0.69 mm (SD 0.53) for the test and control groups (p < .001), respectively. Only 1% of the implants had >3 mm accumulated bone loss after 10 years. Altogether, 10 of the prostheses in both groups had implant component mechanical problems (8.3%). None of the frameworks or implants fractured, but more fractures of porcelain veneers were observed in the test group (p < .05).</abstract><abstract>Conclusion: The protocol of implant treatment in the partially edentulous jaw functioned well during 10 years, although prosthodontic maintenance was required. However, laser‐welded titanium frameworks presented more problems as compared with gold alloy frameworks. More loaded implants were lost (p < .05), and higher incidence of porcelain chipping was noted in the test group (p < .05). However, bone loss was on an average lower for the test group during the 10 years of follow‐up (p < .001).</abstract><subject lang="en"><genre>keywords</genre><topic>complications</topic><topic>fixed prostheses</topic><topic>framework design</topic><topic>implants</topic><topic>laser‐welding</topic><topic>veneering material</topic></subject><relatedItem type="host"><titleInfo><title>Clinical Implant Dentistry and Related Research</title></titleInfo><genre type="journal" authority="ISTEX" authorityURI="https://publication-type.data.istex.fr" valueURI="https://publication-type.data.istex.fr/ark:/67375/JMC-0GLKJH51-B">journal</genre><identifier type="ISSN">1523-0899</identifier><identifier type="eISSN">1708-8208</identifier><identifier type="DOI">10.1111/(ISSN)1708-8208</identifier><identifier type="PublisherID">CID</identifier><part><date>2008</date><detail type="volume"><caption>vol.</caption><number>10</number></detail><detail type="issue"><caption>no.</caption><number>3</number></detail><extent unit="pages"><start>128</start><end>139</end><total>12</total></extent></part></relatedItem><identifier type="istex">D69033F116AB9A4C7EE809D4BC183935EAD810BF</identifier><identifier type="ark">ark:/67375/WNG-G323BB3N-T</identifier><identifier type="DOI">10.1111/j.1708-8208.2007.00073.x</identifier><identifier type="ArticleID">CID073</identifier><accessCondition type="use and reproduction" contentType="copyright">© 2008, Copyright the Authors. Journal Compilation © 2008, Wiley Periodicals, Inc.</accessCondition><recordInfo><recordContentSource authority="ISTEX" authorityURI="https://loaded-corpus.data.istex.fr" valueURI="https://loaded-corpus.data.istex.fr/ark:/67375/XBH-L0C46X92-X">wiley</recordContentSource><recordOrigin>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</recordOrigin></recordInfo></mods><json:item><extension>json</extension><original>false</original><mimetype>application/json</mimetype><uri>https://api.istex.fr/document/D69033F116AB9A4C7EE809D4BC183935EAD810BF/metadata/json</uri></json:item></metadata><serie></serie></istex></record>Pour manipuler ce document sous Unix (Dilib)
EXPLOR_STEP=$WICRI_ROOT/Wicri/Santé/explor/EdenteV2/Data/Istex/Corpus
HfdSelect -h $EXPLOR_STEP/biblio.hfd -nk 006A51 | SxmlIndent | more
Ou
HfdSelect -h $EXPLOR_AREA/Data/Istex/Corpus/biblio.hfd -nk 006A51 | SxmlIndent | more
Pour mettre un lien sur cette page dans le réseau Wicri
{{Explor lien
|wiki= Wicri/Santé
|area= EdenteV2
|flux= Istex
|étape= Corpus
|type= RBID
|clé= ISTEX:D69033F116AB9A4C7EE809D4BC183935EAD810BF
|texte= Laser‐Welded Titanium Frameworks Supported by Implants in the Partially Edentulous Mandible: A 10‐Year Comparative Follow‐Up Study
}}
| This area was generated with Dilib version V0.6.32. |  |