The influence of margin location on the amount of undetected cement excess after delivery of cement‐retained implant restorations
Identifieur interne : 006A16 ( Istex/Corpus ); précédent : 006A15; suivant : 006A17The influence of margin location on the amount of undetected cement excess after delivery of cement‐retained implant restorations
Auteurs : Tomas Linkevicius ; Egle Vindasiute ; Algirdas Puisys ; Vytaute PeciulieneSource :
- Clinical Oral Implants Research [ 0905-7161 ] ; 2011-12.
English descriptors
- KwdEn :
- Abutment, Abutment screw, Adobe photoshop, Algirdas puisys, Belser, Cement, Cement cleaning, Cement remnants, Cement remnants area, Cement removal, Cement weight, Cementation, Cementation margins, Chronic disease, Clinical situation, Crestal bone loss, Deeper subgingivally, Dental calculus, Dental implants, Excess cement, Excess luting agent, Exible gingiva mask, Gingival, Gingival level, Gold inlay castings, Greatest amount, Implant, Implant prostheses, Implant restoration, Implant restorations, Implants research, Individual abutments, International journal, Intracrevicular restoration margins, John wiley sons, Linkevicius, Luting, Luting agent, Many clinicians, Margin, Margin location, Maxillofacial, Metal crowns, More subgingivally, Null hypothesis, Oral impl, Oral maxillofacial implants, Osseointegrated implants, Palatal openings, Prospective study, Prosthesis, Prosthetic, Prosthetic dentistry, Prosthetic management, Remnant, Residual, Residual cement, Restoration margin, Restoration margins, Single crowns, Soft tissues, Statistical unit, Subgingival, Subgingival margins, Subgingival margins table, Subgingival spaces, Subgingivally, Surface area, Tissue level, Tomas linkevicius, Total surface, Total surface area, Undetected, Undetected cement, Undetected cement remnants, Various positions, Vilnius, Visible margins.
- Teeft :
- Abutment, Abutment screw, Adobe photoshop, Algirdas puisys, Belser, Cement, Cement cleaning, Cement remnants, Cement remnants area, Cement removal, Cement weight, Cementation, Cementation margins, Chronic disease, Clinical situation, Crestal bone loss, Deeper subgingivally, Dental calculus, Dental implants, Excess cement, Excess luting agent, Exible gingiva mask, Gingival, Gingival level, Gold inlay castings, Greatest amount, Implant, Implant prostheses, Implant restoration, Implant restorations, Implants research, Individual abutments, International journal, Intracrevicular restoration margins, John wiley sons, Linkevicius, Luting, Luting agent, Many clinicians, Margin, Margin location, Maxillofacial, Metal crowns, More subgingivally, Null hypothesis, Oral impl, Oral maxillofacial implants, Osseointegrated implants, Palatal openings, Prospective study, Prosthesis, Prosthetic, Prosthetic dentistry, Prosthetic management, Remnant, Residual, Residual cement, Restoration margin, Restoration margins, Single crowns, Soft tissues, Statistical unit, Subgingival, Subgingival margins, Subgingival margins table, Subgingival spaces, Subgingivally, Surface area, Tissue level, Tomas linkevicius, Total surface, Total surface area, Undetected, Undetected cement, Undetected cement remnants, Various positions, Vilnius, Visible margins.
Abstract
Objectives: The aim of this study was to evaluate the amount of the residual cement excess after cementation and cleaning of implant‐supported restorations with various positions of the margins.
Url:
DOI: 10.1111/j.1600-0501.2010.02119.x
Links to Exploration step
ISTEX:D5A23A7C7AAB4739A5F4B89FEDF33CC2996FEB0ALe document en format XML
<record><TEI wicri:istexFullTextTei="biblStruct"><teiHeader><fileDesc><titleStmt><title xml:lang="en">The influence of margin location on the amount of undetected cement excess after delivery of cement‐retained implant restorations</title><author><name sortKey="Linkevicius, Tomas" sort="Linkevicius, Tomas" uniqKey="Linkevicius T" first="Tomas" last="Linkevicius">Tomas Linkevicius</name><affiliation><mods:affiliation>Vilnius Research Group, Vilnius, Lithuania</mods:affiliation></affiliation><affiliation><mods:affiliation>Institute of Odontology, Faculty of Medicine, Vilnius University, Vilnius, Lithuania</mods:affiliation></affiliation></author><author><name sortKey="Vindasiute, Egle" sort="Vindasiute, Egle" uniqKey="Vindasiute E" first="Egle" last="Vindasiute">Egle Vindasiute</name><affiliation><mods:affiliation>Vilnius Research Group, Vilnius, Lithuania</mods:affiliation></affiliation><affiliation><mods:affiliation>Vilnius Implantology Center, Vilnius, Lithuania</mods:affiliation></affiliation></author><author><name sortKey="Puisys, Algirdas" sort="Puisys, Algirdas" uniqKey="Puisys A" first="Algirdas" last="Puisys">Algirdas Puisys</name><affiliation><mods:affiliation>Vilnius Research Group, Vilnius, Lithuania</mods:affiliation></affiliation></author><author><name sortKey="Peciuliene, Vytaute" sort="Peciuliene, Vytaute" uniqKey="Peciuliene V" first="Vytaute" last="Peciuliene">Vytaute Peciuliene</name><affiliation><mods:affiliation>Institute of Odontology, Faculty of Medicine, Vilnius University, Vilnius, Lithuania</mods:affiliation></affiliation></author></titleStmt><publicationStmt><idno type="wicri:source">ISTEX</idno><idno type="RBID">ISTEX:D5A23A7C7AAB4739A5F4B89FEDF33CC2996FEB0A</idno><date when="2011" year="2011">2011</date><idno type="doi">10.1111/j.1600-0501.2010.02119.x</idno><idno type="url">https://api.istex.fr/document/D5A23A7C7AAB4739A5F4B89FEDF33CC2996FEB0A/fulltext/pdf</idno><idno type="wicri:Area/Istex/Corpus">006A16</idno><idno type="wicri:explorRef" wicri:stream="Istex" wicri:step="Corpus" wicri:corpus="ISTEX">006A16</idno></publicationStmt><sourceDesc><biblStruct><analytic><title level="a" type="main">The influence of margin location on the amount of undetected cement excess after delivery of cement‐retained implant restorations</title><author><name sortKey="Linkevicius, Tomas" sort="Linkevicius, Tomas" uniqKey="Linkevicius T" first="Tomas" last="Linkevicius">Tomas Linkevicius</name><affiliation><mods:affiliation>Vilnius Research Group, Vilnius, Lithuania</mods:affiliation></affiliation><affiliation><mods:affiliation>Institute of Odontology, Faculty of Medicine, Vilnius University, Vilnius, Lithuania</mods:affiliation></affiliation></author><author><name sortKey="Vindasiute, Egle" sort="Vindasiute, Egle" uniqKey="Vindasiute E" first="Egle" last="Vindasiute">Egle Vindasiute</name><affiliation><mods:affiliation>Vilnius Research Group, Vilnius, Lithuania</mods:affiliation></affiliation><affiliation><mods:affiliation>Vilnius Implantology Center, Vilnius, Lithuania</mods:affiliation></affiliation></author><author><name sortKey="Puisys, Algirdas" sort="Puisys, Algirdas" uniqKey="Puisys A" first="Algirdas" last="Puisys">Algirdas Puisys</name><affiliation><mods:affiliation>Vilnius Research Group, Vilnius, Lithuania</mods:affiliation></affiliation></author><author><name sortKey="Peciuliene, Vytaute" sort="Peciuliene, Vytaute" uniqKey="Peciuliene V" first="Vytaute" last="Peciuliene">Vytaute Peciuliene</name><affiliation><mods:affiliation>Institute of Odontology, Faculty of Medicine, Vilnius University, Vilnius, Lithuania</mods:affiliation></affiliation></author></analytic><monogr></monogr><series><title level="j" type="main">Clinical Oral Implants Research</title><title level="j" type="alt">CLINICAL ORAL IMPLANTS RESEARCH</title><idno type="ISSN">0905-7161</idno><idno type="eISSN">1600-0501</idno><imprint><biblScope unit="vol">22</biblScope><biblScope unit="issue">12</biblScope><biblScope unit="page" from="1379">1379</biblScope><biblScope unit="page" to="1384">1384</biblScope><biblScope unit="page-count">6</biblScope><publisher>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</publisher><pubPlace>Oxford, UK</pubPlace><date type="published" when="2011-12">2011-12</date></imprint><idno type="ISSN">0905-7161</idno></series></biblStruct></sourceDesc><seriesStmt><idno type="ISSN">0905-7161</idno></seriesStmt></fileDesc><profileDesc><textClass><keywords scheme="KwdEn" xml:lang="en"><term>Abutment</term><term>Abutment screw</term><term>Adobe photoshop</term><term>Algirdas puisys</term><term>Belser</term><term>Cement</term><term>Cement cleaning</term><term>Cement remnants</term><term>Cement remnants area</term><term>Cement removal</term><term>Cement weight</term><term>Cementation</term><term>Cementation margins</term><term>Chronic disease</term><term>Clinical situation</term><term>Crestal bone loss</term><term>Deeper subgingivally</term><term>Dental calculus</term><term>Dental implants</term><term>Excess cement</term><term>Excess luting agent</term><term>Exible gingiva mask</term><term>Gingival</term><term>Gingival level</term><term>Gold inlay castings</term><term>Greatest amount</term><term>Implant</term><term>Implant prostheses</term><term>Implant restoration</term><term>Implant restorations</term><term>Implants research</term><term>Individual abutments</term><term>International journal</term><term>Intracrevicular restoration margins</term><term>John wiley sons</term><term>Linkevicius</term><term>Luting</term><term>Luting agent</term><term>Many clinicians</term><term>Margin</term><term>Margin location</term><term>Maxillofacial</term><term>Metal crowns</term><term>More subgingivally</term><term>Null hypothesis</term><term>Oral impl</term><term>Oral maxillofacial implants</term><term>Osseointegrated implants</term><term>Palatal openings</term><term>Prospective study</term><term>Prosthesis</term><term>Prosthetic</term><term>Prosthetic dentistry</term><term>Prosthetic management</term><term>Remnant</term><term>Residual</term><term>Residual cement</term><term>Restoration margin</term><term>Restoration margins</term><term>Single crowns</term><term>Soft tissues</term><term>Statistical unit</term><term>Subgingival</term><term>Subgingival margins</term><term>Subgingival margins table</term><term>Subgingival spaces</term><term>Subgingivally</term><term>Surface area</term><term>Tissue level</term><term>Tomas linkevicius</term><term>Total surface</term><term>Total surface area</term><term>Undetected</term><term>Undetected cement</term><term>Undetected cement remnants</term><term>Various positions</term><term>Vilnius</term><term>Visible margins</term></keywords><keywords scheme="Teeft" xml:lang="en"><term>Abutment</term><term>Abutment screw</term><term>Adobe photoshop</term><term>Algirdas puisys</term><term>Belser</term><term>Cement</term><term>Cement cleaning</term><term>Cement remnants</term><term>Cement remnants area</term><term>Cement removal</term><term>Cement weight</term><term>Cementation</term><term>Cementation margins</term><term>Chronic disease</term><term>Clinical situation</term><term>Crestal bone loss</term><term>Deeper subgingivally</term><term>Dental calculus</term><term>Dental implants</term><term>Excess cement</term><term>Excess luting agent</term><term>Exible gingiva mask</term><term>Gingival</term><term>Gingival level</term><term>Gold inlay castings</term><term>Greatest amount</term><term>Implant</term><term>Implant prostheses</term><term>Implant restoration</term><term>Implant restorations</term><term>Implants research</term><term>Individual abutments</term><term>International journal</term><term>Intracrevicular restoration margins</term><term>John wiley sons</term><term>Linkevicius</term><term>Luting</term><term>Luting agent</term><term>Many clinicians</term><term>Margin</term><term>Margin location</term><term>Maxillofacial</term><term>Metal crowns</term><term>More subgingivally</term><term>Null hypothesis</term><term>Oral impl</term><term>Oral maxillofacial implants</term><term>Osseointegrated implants</term><term>Palatal openings</term><term>Prospective study</term><term>Prosthesis</term><term>Prosthetic</term><term>Prosthetic dentistry</term><term>Prosthetic management</term><term>Remnant</term><term>Residual</term><term>Residual cement</term><term>Restoration margin</term><term>Restoration margins</term><term>Single crowns</term><term>Soft tissues</term><term>Statistical unit</term><term>Subgingival</term><term>Subgingival margins</term><term>Subgingival margins table</term><term>Subgingival spaces</term><term>Subgingivally</term><term>Surface area</term><term>Tissue level</term><term>Tomas linkevicius</term><term>Total surface</term><term>Total surface area</term><term>Undetected</term><term>Undetected cement</term><term>Undetected cement remnants</term><term>Various positions</term><term>Vilnius</term><term>Visible margins</term></keywords></textClass></profileDesc></teiHeader><front><div type="abstract">Objectives: The aim of this study was to evaluate the amount of the residual cement excess after cementation and cleaning of implant‐supported restorations with various positions of the margins.</div></front></TEI><istex><corpusName>wiley</corpusName><keywords><teeft><json:string>implant</json:string><json:string>abutment</json:string><json:string>cement remnants</json:string><json:string>subgingivally</json:string><json:string>subgingival</json:string><json:string>prosthetic</json:string><json:string>cementation</json:string><json:string>international journal</json:string><json:string>belser</json:string><json:string>linkevicius</json:string><json:string>luting</json:string><json:string>maxillofacial</json:string><json:string>oral maxillofacial implants</json:string><json:string>implant restorations</json:string><json:string>prosthesis</json:string><json:string>gingival</json:string><json:string>gingival level</json:string><json:string>vilnius</json:string><json:string>excess cement</json:string><json:string>undetected cement</json:string><json:string>subgingival margins</json:string><json:string>residual cement</json:string><json:string>undetected</json:string><json:string>implant restoration</json:string><json:string>john wiley sons</json:string><json:string>oral impl</json:string><json:string>remnant</json:string><json:string>prosthetic dentistry</json:string><json:string>cement</json:string><json:string>restoration margins</json:string><json:string>abutment screw</json:string><json:string>luting agent</json:string><json:string>implants research</json:string><json:string>residual</json:string><json:string>margin</json:string><json:string>dental implants</json:string><json:string>individual abutments</json:string><json:string>margin location</json:string><json:string>osseointegrated implants</json:string><json:string>prospective study</json:string><json:string>undetected cement remnants</json:string><json:string>tomas linkevicius</json:string><json:string>cement removal</json:string><json:string>tissue level</json:string><json:string>null hypothesis</json:string><json:string>exible gingiva mask</json:string><json:string>palatal openings</json:string><json:string>deeper subgingivally</json:string><json:string>more subgingivally</json:string><json:string>metal crowns</json:string><json:string>cementation margins</json:string><json:string>surface area</json:string><json:string>total surface area</json:string><json:string>statistical unit</json:string><json:string>subgingival margins table</json:string><json:string>greatest amount</json:string><json:string>total surface</json:string><json:string>cement weight</json:string><json:string>visible margins</json:string><json:string>cement remnants area</json:string><json:string>restoration margin</json:string><json:string>gold inlay castings</json:string><json:string>subgingival spaces</json:string><json:string>crestal bone loss</json:string><json:string>intracrevicular restoration margins</json:string><json:string>implant prostheses</json:string><json:string>clinical situation</json:string><json:string>excess luting agent</json:string><json:string>adobe photoshop</json:string><json:string>cement cleaning</json:string><json:string>dental calculus</json:string><json:string>algirdas puisys</json:string><json:string>soft tissues</json:string><json:string>chronic disease</json:string><json:string>prosthetic management</json:string><json:string>single crowns</json:string><json:string>various positions</json:string><json:string>many clinicians</json:string></teeft></keywords><author><json:item><name>Tomas Linkevicius</name><affiliations><json:string>Vilnius Research Group, Vilnius, Lithuania</json:string><json:string>Institute of Odontology, Faculty of Medicine, Vilnius University, Vilnius, Lithuania</json:string></affiliations></json:item><json:item><name>Egle Vindasiute</name><affiliations><json:string>Vilnius Research Group, Vilnius, Lithuania</json:string><json:string>Vilnius Implantology Center, Vilnius, Lithuania</json:string></affiliations></json:item><json:item><name>Algirdas Puisys</name><affiliations><json:string>Vilnius Research Group, Vilnius, Lithuania</json:string></affiliations></json:item><json:item><name>Vytaute Peciuliene</name><affiliations><json:string>Institute of Odontology, Faculty of Medicine, Vilnius University, Vilnius, Lithuania</json:string></affiliations></json:item></author><subject><json:item><lang><json:string>eng</json:string></lang><value>cast abutments</value></json:item><json:item><lang><json:string>eng</json:string></lang><value>cement cleaning</value></json:item><json:item><lang><json:string>eng</json:string></lang><value>cement excess</value></json:item><json:item><lang><json:string>eng</json:string></lang><value>cement‐retained implant restorations</value></json:item><json:item><lang><json:string>eng</json:string></lang><value>subgingival margins</value></json:item></subject><articleId><json:string>CLR2119</json:string></articleId><arkIstex>ark:/67375/WNG-5PB6X29Z-4</arkIstex><language><json:string>eng</json:string></language><originalGenre><json:string>article</json:string></originalGenre><abstract>Objectives: The aim of this study was to evaluate the amount of the residual cement excess after cementation and cleaning of implant‐supported restorations with various positions of the margins.</abstract><qualityIndicators><score>6.35</score><pdfWordCount>4002</pdfWordCount><pdfCharCount>25784</pdfCharCount><pdfVersion>1.3</pdfVersion><pdfPageCount>6</pdfPageCount><pdfPageSize>595.276 x 782.362 pts</pdfPageSize><refBibsNative>true</refBibsNative><abstractWordCount>29</abstractWordCount><abstractCharCount>194</abstractCharCount><keywordCount>5</keywordCount></qualityIndicators><title>The influence of margin location on the amount of undetected cement excess after delivery of cement‐retained implant restorations</title><pmid><json:string>21382089</json:string></pmid><genre><json:string>article</json:string></genre><host><title>Clinical Oral Implants Research</title><language><json:string>unknown</json:string></language><doi><json:string>10.1111/(ISSN)1600-0501</json:string></doi><issn><json:string>0905-7161</json:string></issn><eissn><json:string>1600-0501</json:string></eissn><publisherId><json:string>CLR</json:string></publisherId><volume>22</volume><issue>12</issue><pages><first>1379</first><last>1384</last><total>6</total></pages><genre><json:string>journal</json:string></genre></host><namedEntities><unitex><date><json:string>2011</json:string></date><geogName></geogName><orgName><json:string>Adobe Systems Ltd, Europe</json:string><json:string>SPSS Inc., Chicago</json:string><json:string>Tomas Linkevicius Institute of Odontology Faculty of Medicine Vilnius University Zalgirio</json:string><json:string>Dentsply International Inc.</json:string><json:string>The International Journal</json:string><json:string>Vilnius Lithuania Tel</json:string></orgName><orgName_funder></orgName_funder><orgName_provider></orgName_provider><persName><json:string>Tomas Linkevicius</json:string><json:string>Results</json:string><json:string>John Wiley</json:string><json:string>Buser</json:string></persName><placeName><json:string>Switzerland</json:string><json:string>Germany</json:string><json:string>Blanes</json:string><json:string>UK</json:string><json:string>Unna</json:string><json:string>USA</json:string><json:string>Japan</json:string><json:string>DE</json:string><json:string>Tokyo</json:string><json:string>CA</json:string><json:string>AL</json:string><json:string>Monrovia</json:string><json:string>Hanau</json:string><json:string>Mainz</json:string><json:string>Milford</json:string></placeName><ref_url></ref_url><ref_bibl><json:string>Gapski et al. 2008</json:string><json:string>Linkevicius et al</json:string><json:string>Chee et al. 1999</json:string><json:string>Agar et al. 1997</json:string><json:string>Pauletto et al. 1999</json:string><json:string>Aleksejuniene et al. 2006</json:string><json:string>Keller et al. (1998)</json:string><json:string>Blanes et al. (2007)</json:string><json:string>Patel et al. 2009</json:string><json:string>Wadhwani & Pineryo 2009</json:string><json:string>Schedle et al. 1998</json:string><json:string>Agar et al. (1997)</json:string><json:string>Dumbrigue et al. 2002</json:string><json:string>Ishikiriama et al. 1981</json:string><json:string>Jung et al. 2008</json:string><json:string>Andersson et al. (1998)</json:string><json:string>Andersson et al. 1995</json:string><json:string>Assenza et al. (2006)</json:string><json:string>Wilson 2009</json:string><json:string>Michalakis et al. 2003</json:string><json:string>Tan et al. 2004</json:string><json:string>Higginbottom et al. 2004</json:string><json:string>Belser et al. 1998</json:string><json:string>Giannopoulou et al. (2003)</json:string><json:string>Nedir et al. 2006</json:string><json:string>Belser et al. 2000</json:string><json:string>Christensen 1966</json:string><json:string>White 1997</json:string><json:string>Belser et al. 2004a, 2004b</json:string></ref_bibl><bibl></bibl></unitex></namedEntities><ark><json:string>ark:/67375/WNG-5PB6X29Z-4</json:string></ark><categories><wos><json:string>1 - science</json:string><json:string>2 - engineering, biomedical</json:string><json:string>2 - dentistry, oral surgery & medicine</json:string></wos><scienceMetrix><json:string>1 - health sciences</json:string><json:string>2 - clinical medicine</json:string><json:string>3 - dentistry</json:string></scienceMetrix><scopus><json:string>1 - Health Sciences</json:string><json:string>2 - Dentistry</json:string><json:string>3 - Oral Surgery</json:string></scopus></categories><publicationDate>2011</publicationDate><copyrightDate>2011</copyrightDate><doi><json:string>10.1111/j.1600-0501.2010.02119.x</json:string></doi><id>D5A23A7C7AAB4739A5F4B89FEDF33CC2996FEB0A</id><score>1</score><fulltext><json:item><extension>pdf</extension><original>true</original><mimetype>application/pdf</mimetype><uri>https://api.istex.fr/document/D5A23A7C7AAB4739A5F4B89FEDF33CC2996FEB0A/fulltext/pdf</uri></json:item><json:item><extension>zip</extension><original>false</original><mimetype>application/zip</mimetype><uri>https://api.istex.fr/document/D5A23A7C7AAB4739A5F4B89FEDF33CC2996FEB0A/fulltext/zip</uri></json:item><istex:fulltextTEI uri="https://api.istex.fr/document/D5A23A7C7AAB4739A5F4B89FEDF33CC2996FEB0A/fulltext/tei"><teiHeader><fileDesc><titleStmt><title level="a" type="main">The influence of margin location on the amount of undetected cement excess after delivery of cement‐retained implant restorations</title></titleStmt><publicationStmt><authority>ISTEX</authority><publisher>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</publisher><pubPlace>Oxford, UK</pubPlace><availability><licence>© 2011 John Wiley & Sons A/S</licence></availability><date type="published" when="2011-12"></date></publicationStmt><notesStmt><note type="content-type" subtype="article" source="article" scheme="https://content-type.data.istex.fr/ark:/67375/XTP-6N5SZHKN-D">article</note><note type="publication-type" subtype="journal" scheme="https://publication-type.data.istex.fr/ark:/67375/JMC-0GLKJH51-B">journal</note></notesStmt><sourceDesc><biblStruct type="article"><analytic><title level="a" type="main">The influence of margin location on the amount of undetected cement excess after delivery of cement‐retained implant restorations</title><title level="a" type="short">Cement excess around subgingival margins</title><author xml:id="author-0000"><persName><forename type="first">Tomas</forename><surname>Linkevicius</surname></persName><affiliation>Vilnius Research Group, Vilnius, Lithuania<address><country key="LT"></country></address></affiliation><affiliation>Institute of Odontology, Faculty of Medicine, Vilnius University, Vilnius, Lithuania<address><country key="LT"></country></address></affiliation></author><author xml:id="author-0001"><persName><forename type="first">Egle</forename><surname>Vindasiute</surname></persName><affiliation>Vilnius Research Group, Vilnius, Lithuania<address><country key="LT"></country></address></affiliation><affiliation>Vilnius Implantology Center, Vilnius, Lithuania<address><country key="LT"></country></address></affiliation></author><author xml:id="author-0002"><persName><forename type="first">Algirdas</forename><surname>Puisys</surname></persName><affiliation>Vilnius Research Group, Vilnius, Lithuania<address><country key="LT"></country></address></affiliation></author><author xml:id="author-0003"><persName><forename type="first">Vytaute</forename><surname>Peciuliene</surname></persName><affiliation>Institute of Odontology, Faculty of Medicine, Vilnius University, Vilnius, Lithuania<address><country key="LT"></country></address></affiliation></author><idno type="istex">D5A23A7C7AAB4739A5F4B89FEDF33CC2996FEB0A</idno><idno type="ark">ark:/67375/WNG-5PB6X29Z-4</idno><idno type="DOI">10.1111/j.1600-0501.2010.02119.x</idno><idno type="unit">CLR2119</idno><idno type="supplier">2119</idno><idno type="toTypesetVersion">file:CLR.CLR2119.pdf</idno></analytic><monogr><title level="j" type="main">Clinical Oral Implants Research</title><title level="j" type="alt">CLINICAL ORAL IMPLANTS RESEARCH</title><idno type="pISSN">0905-7161</idno><idno type="eISSN">1600-0501</idno><idno type="book-DOI">10.1111/(ISSN)1600-0501</idno><idno type="book-part-DOI">10.1111/clr.2011.22.issue-12</idno><idno type="product">CLR</idno><idno type="publisherDivision">ST</idno><imprint><biblScope unit="vol">22</biblScope><biblScope unit="issue">12</biblScope><biblScope unit="page" from="1379">1379</biblScope><biblScope unit="page" to="1384">1384</biblScope><biblScope unit="page-count">6</biblScope><publisher>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</publisher><pubPlace>Oxford, UK</pubPlace><date type="published" when="2011-12"></date></imprint></monogr></biblStruct></sourceDesc></fileDesc><profileDesc><abstract xml:lang="en" style="main"><head>Abstract</head><p><hi rend="bold">Objectives: </hi> The aim of this study was to evaluate the amount of the residual cement excess after cementation and cleaning of implant‐supported restorations with various positions of the margins.</p><p><hi rend="bold">Material and methods: </hi> Twenty‐five casts with embedded implant analogs and flexible soft‐tissue imitation were used in the study. Individual abutments with different position of the margin – from 1 mm supragingivally to 3 mm below the gingival level – were modelled and divided equally into five groups. The same amount of polished metal crowns was luted to prosthetic abutments, excess cement was cleaned and the restorations were removed for evaluation of the undetected cement remnants. All quadrants of each specimen were photographed for calculation of the ratio between the cement remnants area and the total specimen area using Adobe Photoshop. Afterwards, cement remnants were cleared from each specimen and weighed with analytical balances.</p><p><hi rend="bold">Results: </hi> The measurements in all the groups consisted of (1) the relation between the cement remnants area and the total area of the specimen; and (2) cement excess weight in grams after cleaning: group 1 (0.0111 ± 0.021; 0.0003 ± 0.0001 g); group 2 (0.0165 ± 0.019; 0.0008 ± 0.0003 g); group 3 (0.0572 ± 0.028; 0.0013 ± 0.0005 g); group 4 (0.1158 ± 0.054; 0.0051 ± 0.0013 g); and group 5 (0.1171 ± 0.059; 0.0063 ± 0.0021 g). Results showed significant increase of undetected cement quantity, as the restoration margins were located deeper subgingivally, using weighting (<hi rend="italic">P</hi>=0) and calculation of proportion (<hi rend="italic">P</hi>=0). There was a significant correlation between evaluation techniques (<hi rend="italic">r</hi>=0.889; <hi rend="italic">P</hi>=0).</p><p><hi rend="bold">Conclusions: </hi> The amount of residual cement after cleaning increased as the restoration margins were located more subgingivally.</p><p><hi rend="bold">To cite this article:</hi>
Linkevicius T, Vindasiute E, Puisys A, Peciuliene, V. The influence of margin location on the amount of undetected cement excess after delivery of cement‐retained implant restorations.
<hi rend="italic">Clin. Oral Impl. Res</hi>. <hi rend="bold">xx</hi>, 2011; 000–000.</p></abstract><textClass><keywords xml:lang="en"><term xml:id="k1">cast abutments</term><term xml:id="k2">cement cleaning</term><term xml:id="k3">cement excess</term><term xml:id="k4">cement‐retained implant restorations</term><term xml:id="k5">subgingival margins</term></keywords><keywords rend="tocHeading1"><term>Original Articles</term></keywords></textClass><langUsage><language ident="en"></language></langUsage></profileDesc></teiHeader></istex:fulltextTEI><json:item><extension>txt</extension><original>false</original><mimetype>text/plain</mimetype><uri>https://api.istex.fr/document/D5A23A7C7AAB4739A5F4B89FEDF33CC2996FEB0A/fulltext/txt</uri></json:item></fulltext><metadata><istex:metadataXml wicri:clean="Wiley, elements deleted: body"><istex:xmlDeclaration>version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" standalone="yes"</istex:xmlDeclaration><istex:document><component version="2.0" type="serialArticle" xml:lang="en"><header><publicationMeta level="product"><publisherInfo><publisherName>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</publisherName><publisherLoc>Oxford, UK</publisherLoc></publisherInfo><doi origin="wiley" registered="yes">10.1111/(ISSN)1600-0501</doi><issn type="print">0905-7161</issn><issn type="electronic">1600-0501</issn><idGroup><id type="product" value="CLR"></id><id type="publisherDivision" value="ST"></id></idGroup><titleGroup><title type="main" sort="CLINICAL ORAL IMPLANTS RESEARCH">Clinical Oral Implants Research</title></titleGroup></publicationMeta><publicationMeta level="part" position="12112"><doi origin="wiley">10.1111/clr.2011.22.issue-12</doi><numberingGroup><numbering type="journalVolume" number="22">22</numbering><numbering type="journalIssue" number="12">12</numbering></numberingGroup><coverDate startDate="2011-12">December 2011</coverDate></publicationMeta><publicationMeta level="unit" type="article" position="7" status="forIssue"><doi origin="wiley">10.1111/j.1600-0501.2010.02119.x</doi><idGroup><id type="unit" value="CLR2119"></id><id type="supplier" value="2119"></id></idGroup><countGroup><count type="pageTotal" number="6"></count></countGroup><titleGroup><title type="tocHeading1">Original Articles</title></titleGroup><copyright>© 2011 John Wiley & Sons A/S</copyright><eventGroup><event type="xmlConverted" agent="Converter:BPG_TO_WML3G version:2.10 mode:FullText" date="2011-11-07"></event><event type="publishedOnlineEarlyUnpaginated" date="2011-03-08"></event><event type="firstOnline" date="2011-03-08"></event><event type="publishedOnlineFinalForm" date="2011-11-07"></event><event type="xmlConverted" agent="Converter:WILEY_ML3G_TO_WILEY_ML3GV2 version:4.0.1" date="2014-03-12"></event><event type="xmlConverted" agent="Converter:WML3G_To_WML3G version:4.1.7 mode:FullText,remove_FC" date="2014-10-16"></event></eventGroup><numberingGroup><numbering type="pageFirst" number="1379">1379</numbering><numbering type="pageLast" number="1384">1384</numbering></numberingGroup><correspondenceTo><b>Corresponding author:</b>
<i>Tomas Linkevicius</i>
Institute of Odontology
Faculty of Medicine
Vilnius University
Zalgirio str. 115/117
LT‐ 08217, Vilnius
Lithuania
Tel.: +370 687 72840
Fax: +370 527 60725
e‐mail: <email normalForm="linktomo@gmail.com">linktomo@gmail.com</email></correspondenceTo><linkGroup><link type="toTypesetVersion" href="file:CLR.CLR2119.pdf"></link></linkGroup></publicationMeta><contentMeta><unparsedEditorialHistory><b>Date:</b> , Accepted 26 October 2010</unparsedEditorialHistory><countGroup><count type="figureTotal" number="9"></count><count type="tableTotal" number="3"></count><count type="formulaTotal" number="0"></count><count type="referenceTotal" number="28"></count><count type="wordTotal" number="5182"></count><count type="linksCrossRef" number="46"></count></countGroup><titleGroup><title type="main">The influence of margin location on the amount of undetected cement excess after delivery of cement‐retained implant restorations</title><title type="shortAuthors">Linkevicius et al.</title><title type="short">Cement excess around subgingival margins</title></titleGroup><creators><creator creatorRole="author" xml:id="cr1" affiliationRef="#a1 #a3"><personName><givenNames>Tomas</givenNames><familyName>Linkevicius</familyName></personName></creator><creator creatorRole="author" xml:id="cr2" affiliationRef="#a1 #a2"><personName><givenNames>Egle</givenNames><familyName>Vindasiute</familyName></personName></creator><creator creatorRole="author" xml:id="cr3" affiliationRef="#a1"><personName><givenNames>Algirdas</givenNames><familyName>Puisys</familyName></personName></creator><creator creatorRole="author" xml:id="cr4" affiliationRef="#a3"><personName><givenNames>Vytaute</givenNames><familyName>Peciuliene</familyName></personName></creator></creators><affiliationGroup><affiliation xml:id="a1" countryCode="LT"><unparsedAffiliation>Vilnius Research Group, Vilnius, Lithuania</unparsedAffiliation></affiliation><affiliation xml:id="a2" countryCode="LT"><unparsedAffiliation>Vilnius Implantology Center, Vilnius, Lithuania</unparsedAffiliation></affiliation><affiliation xml:id="a3" countryCode="LT"><unparsedAffiliation>Institute of Odontology, Faculty of Medicine, Vilnius University, Vilnius, Lithuania</unparsedAffiliation></affiliation></affiliationGroup><keywordGroup xml:lang="en"><keyword xml:id="k1">cast abutments</keyword><keyword xml:id="k2">cement cleaning</keyword><keyword xml:id="k3">cement excess</keyword><keyword xml:id="k4">cement‐retained implant restorations</keyword><keyword xml:id="k5">subgingival margins</keyword></keywordGroup><abstractGroup><abstract type="main" xml:lang="en"><title type="main">Abstract</title><p><b>Objectives: </b> The aim of this study was to evaluate the amount of the residual cement excess after cementation and cleaning of implant‐supported restorations with various positions of the margins.</p><p><b>Material and methods: </b> Twenty‐five casts with embedded implant analogs and flexible soft‐tissue imitation were used in the study. Individual abutments with different position of the margin – from 1 mm supragingivally to 3 mm below the gingival level – were modelled and divided equally into five groups. The same amount of polished metal crowns was luted to prosthetic abutments, excess cement was cleaned and the restorations were removed for evaluation of the undetected cement remnants. All quadrants of each specimen were photographed for calculation of the ratio between the cement remnants area and the total specimen area using Adobe Photoshop. Afterwards, cement remnants were cleared from each specimen and weighed with analytical balances.</p><p><b>Results: </b> The measurements in all the groups consisted of (1) the relation between the cement remnants area and the total area of the specimen; and (2) cement excess weight in grams after cleaning: group 1 (0.0111 ± 0.021; 0.0003 ± 0.0001 g); group 2 (0.0165 ± 0.019; 0.0008 ± 0.0003 g); group 3 (0.0572 ± 0.028; 0.0013 ± 0.0005 g); group 4 (0.1158 ± 0.054; 0.0051 ± 0.0013 g); and group 5 (0.1171 ± 0.059; 0.0063 ± 0.0021 g). Results showed significant increase of undetected cement quantity, as the restoration margins were located deeper subgingivally, using weighting (<i>P</i>=0) and calculation of proportion (<i>P</i>=0). There was a significant correlation between evaluation techniques (<i>r</i>=0.889; <i>P</i>=0).</p><p><b>Conclusions: </b> The amount of residual cement after cleaning increased as the restoration margins were located more subgingivally.</p><p><b>To cite this article:</b>
Linkevicius T, Vindasiute E, Puisys A, Peciuliene, V. The influence of margin location on the amount of undetected cement excess after delivery of cement‐retained implant restorations.
<i>Clin. Oral Impl. Res</i>. <b>xx</b>, 2011; 000–000.</p></abstract></abstractGroup></contentMeta></header></component></istex:document></istex:metadataXml><mods version="3.6"><titleInfo lang="en"><title>The influence of margin location on the amount of undetected cement excess after delivery of cement‐retained implant restorations</title></titleInfo><titleInfo type="abbreviated" lang="en"><title>Cement excess around subgingival margins</title></titleInfo><titleInfo type="alternative" contentType="CDATA" lang="en"><title>The influence of margin location on the amount of undetected cement excess after delivery of cement‐retained implant restorations</title></titleInfo><name type="personal"><namePart type="given">Tomas</namePart><namePart type="family">Linkevicius</namePart><affiliation>Vilnius Research Group, Vilnius, Lithuania</affiliation><affiliation>Institute of Odontology, Faculty of Medicine, Vilnius University, Vilnius, Lithuania</affiliation><role><roleTerm type="text">author</roleTerm></role></name><name type="personal"><namePart type="given">Egle</namePart><namePart type="family">Vindasiute</namePart><affiliation>Vilnius Research Group, Vilnius, Lithuania</affiliation><affiliation>Vilnius Implantology Center, Vilnius, Lithuania</affiliation><role><roleTerm type="text">author</roleTerm></role></name><name type="personal"><namePart type="given">Algirdas</namePart><namePart type="family">Puisys</namePart><affiliation>Vilnius Research Group, Vilnius, Lithuania</affiliation><role><roleTerm type="text">author</roleTerm></role></name><name type="personal"><namePart type="given">Vytaute</namePart><namePart type="family">Peciuliene</namePart><affiliation>Institute of Odontology, Faculty of Medicine, Vilnius University, Vilnius, Lithuania</affiliation><role><roleTerm type="text">author</roleTerm></role></name><typeOfResource>text</typeOfResource><genre type="article" displayLabel="article" authority="ISTEX" authorityURI="https://content-type.data.istex.fr" valueURI="https://content-type.data.istex.fr/ark:/67375/XTP-6N5SZHKN-D">article</genre><originInfo><publisher>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</publisher><place><placeTerm type="text">Oxford, UK</placeTerm></place><dateIssued encoding="w3cdtf">2011-12</dateIssued><edition>Date: , Accepted 26 October 2010</edition><copyrightDate encoding="w3cdtf">2011</copyrightDate></originInfo><language><languageTerm type="code" authority="rfc3066">en</languageTerm><languageTerm type="code" authority="iso639-2b">eng</languageTerm></language><physicalDescription><extent unit="figures">9</extent><extent unit="tables">3</extent><extent unit="formulas">0</extent><extent unit="references">28</extent><extent unit="linksCrossRef">46</extent><extent unit="words">5182</extent></physicalDescription><abstract>Objectives: The aim of this study was to evaluate the amount of the residual cement excess after cementation and cleaning of implant‐supported restorations with various positions of the margins.</abstract><abstract>Material and methods: Twenty‐five casts with embedded implant analogs and flexible soft‐tissue imitation were used in the study. Individual abutments with different position of the margin – from 1 mm supragingivally to 3 mm below the gingival level – were modelled and divided equally into five groups. The same amount of polished metal crowns was luted to prosthetic abutments, excess cement was cleaned and the restorations were removed for evaluation of the undetected cement remnants. All quadrants of each specimen were photographed for calculation of the ratio between the cement remnants area and the total specimen area using Adobe Photoshop. Afterwards, cement remnants were cleared from each specimen and weighed with analytical balances.</abstract><abstract>Results: The measurements in all the groups consisted of (1) the relation between the cement remnants area and the total area of the specimen; and (2) cement excess weight in grams after cleaning: group 1 (0.0111 ± 0.021; 0.0003 ± 0.0001 g); group 2 (0.0165 ± 0.019; 0.0008 ± 0.0003 g); group 3 (0.0572 ± 0.028; 0.0013 ± 0.0005 g); group 4 (0.1158 ± 0.054; 0.0051 ± 0.0013 g); and group 5 (0.1171 ± 0.059; 0.0063 ± 0.0021 g). Results showed significant increase of undetected cement quantity, as the restoration margins were located deeper subgingivally, using weighting (P=0) and calculation of proportion (P=0). There was a significant correlation between evaluation techniques (r=0.889; P=0).</abstract><abstract>Conclusions: The amount of residual cement after cleaning increased as the restoration margins were located more subgingivally.</abstract><abstract>To cite this article:
Linkevicius T, Vindasiute E, Puisys A, Peciuliene, V. The influence of margin location on the amount of undetected cement excess after delivery of cement‐retained implant restorations.
Clin. Oral Impl. Res. xx, 2011; 000–000.</abstract><subject lang="en"><genre>keywords</genre><topic>cast abutments</topic><topic>cement cleaning</topic><topic>cement excess</topic><topic>cement‐retained implant restorations</topic><topic>subgingival margins</topic></subject><relatedItem type="host"><titleInfo><title>Clinical Oral Implants Research</title></titleInfo><genre type="journal" authority="ISTEX" authorityURI="https://publication-type.data.istex.fr" valueURI="https://publication-type.data.istex.fr/ark:/67375/JMC-0GLKJH51-B">journal</genre><identifier type="ISSN">0905-7161</identifier><identifier type="eISSN">1600-0501</identifier><identifier type="DOI">10.1111/(ISSN)1600-0501</identifier><identifier type="PublisherID">CLR</identifier><part><date>2011</date><detail type="volume"><caption>vol.</caption><number>22</number></detail><detail type="issue"><caption>no.</caption><number>12</number></detail><extent unit="pages"><start>1379</start><end>1384</end><total>6</total></extent></part></relatedItem><identifier type="istex">D5A23A7C7AAB4739A5F4B89FEDF33CC2996FEB0A</identifier><identifier type="ark">ark:/67375/WNG-5PB6X29Z-4</identifier><identifier type="DOI">10.1111/j.1600-0501.2010.02119.x</identifier><identifier type="ArticleID">CLR2119</identifier><accessCondition type="use and reproduction" contentType="copyright">© 2011 John Wiley & Sons A/S</accessCondition><recordInfo><recordContentSource authority="ISTEX" authorityURI="https://loaded-corpus.data.istex.fr" valueURI="https://loaded-corpus.data.istex.fr/ark:/67375/XBH-L0C46X92-X">wiley</recordContentSource><recordOrigin>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</recordOrigin></recordInfo></mods><json:item><extension>json</extension><original>false</original><mimetype>application/json</mimetype><uri>https://api.istex.fr/document/D5A23A7C7AAB4739A5F4B89FEDF33CC2996FEB0A/metadata/json</uri></json:item></metadata><serie></serie></istex></record>Pour manipuler ce document sous Unix (Dilib)
EXPLOR_STEP=$WICRI_ROOT/Wicri/Santé/explor/EdenteV2/Data/Istex/Corpus
HfdSelect -h $EXPLOR_STEP/biblio.hfd -nk 006A16 | SxmlIndent | more
Ou
HfdSelect -h $EXPLOR_AREA/Data/Istex/Corpus/biblio.hfd -nk 006A16 | SxmlIndent | more
Pour mettre un lien sur cette page dans le réseau Wicri
{{Explor lien
|wiki= Wicri/Santé
|area= EdenteV2
|flux= Istex
|étape= Corpus
|type= RBID
|clé= ISTEX:D5A23A7C7AAB4739A5F4B89FEDF33CC2996FEB0A
|texte= The influence of margin location on the amount of undetected cement excess after delivery of cement‐retained implant restorations
}}
| This area was generated with Dilib version V0.6.32. |  |