State of the art in oral implants
Identifieur interne : 006A06 ( Istex/Corpus ); précédent : 006A05; suivant : 006A07State of the art in oral implants
Auteurs : Tomas Albrektsson ; Lars SennerbySource :
- Journal of Clinical Periodontology [ 0303-6979 ] ; 1991-07.
English descriptors
- KwdEn :
- Albrektsson, Albrektsson sennerby, Allgemeine grundlagen, Blade implants, Blade vent implants, Bodine yanase, Bone height, Bone loss, Branemark, Branemark implant, Bridge stability rate, Ceramic implants, Clinical data, Clinical results, Clinical standpoint, Consecutively, Consensus conference, Dent, Dental clinics, Dental implant, Dental implants, Edentulous, Edentulous jaws, Edentulous patients, Flemmig holtje, Georg thieme verlag, High success rate, Hollow basket implant, Human beings, Hydroxyapatite, Implant, Implant design, Implant devices, Implant mobility, Implant success, Implant system, Implant systems, Integral implants, Malmquist sennerby, Mandible, Mandibular, Mandibular implants, Many cases, Maxillofac, Mental foraminae, Multicenter, Multicenter study, Nobelpharma implants, Oral implant designs, Oral implant systems, Oral implants, Oral maxillofac, Orale implantologie, Osseointegrated, Other implant systems, Palm springs, Partial edentulism, Patient control, Preprosthetic surgery, Present authors, Present paper, Progressive saucerization, Prospective study, Prosthetic dentistry, Pure titanium, Quintessence publ, Range years, Retrospective study, Schnitman shulman, Sennerby, Shulman, Single replacements, Smith zarb, Smithloff fritz, Soft tissue, Staple, Subperiosteal, Subperiosteal implants, Success criteria, Success rate, Success rates, Surg, Survival figures, Survival rate, Titanium implants exfoliated, Transmandibular, Transmandibular implant, Tubingen, Valuable data, Zarb.
- Teeft :
- Albrektsson, Albrektsson sennerby, Allgemeine grundlagen, Blade implants, Blade vent implants, Bodine yanase, Bone height, Bone loss, Branemark, Branemark implant, Bridge stability rate, Ceramic implants, Clinical data, Clinical results, Clinical standpoint, Consecutively, Consensus conference, Dent, Dental clinics, Dental implant, Dental implants, Edentulous, Edentulous jaws, Edentulous patients, Flemmig holtje, Georg thieme verlag, High success rate, Hollow basket implant, Human beings, Hydroxyapatite, Implant, Implant design, Implant devices, Implant mobility, Implant success, Implant system, Implant systems, Integral implants, Malmquist sennerby, Mandible, Mandibular, Mandibular implants, Many cases, Maxillofac, Mental foraminae, Multicenter, Multicenter study, Nobelpharma implants, Oral implant designs, Oral implant systems, Oral implants, Oral maxillofac, Orale implantologie, Osseointegrated, Other implant systems, Palm springs, Partial edentulism, Patient control, Preprosthetic surgery, Present authors, Present paper, Progressive saucerization, Prospective study, Prosthetic dentistry, Pure titanium, Quintessence publ, Range years, Retrospective study, Schnitman shulman, Sennerby, Shulman, Single replacements, Smith zarb, Smithloff fritz, Soft tissue, Staple, Subperiosteal, Subperiosteal implants, Success criteria, Success rate, Success rates, Surg, Survival figures, Survival rate, Titanium implants exfoliated, Transmandibular, Transmandibular implant, Tubingen, Valuable data, Zarb.
Abstract
Abstract. Uncontrolled oral implant devices are still being widely used. The documentation of most oral implant systems is poorly backed up or not followed up for an adequate time period. Success rates are being quoted without reference to any defined success criteria. Frequently used oral implant designs such as the Core‐Vent, IMZ and Calcitek hydroxyapatite coated implants are in neither case supported by any adequate clinical reports from minimally 5‐years of follow‐up. Other implant systems such as the ITI, some subperiosteal designs and the Tubingen implant demonstrate well‐controlled and acceptable 5‐year data but are not followed up in a sufficient number or have demonstrated less good results in the 10‐year evaluation. The Small transosteal staple has been adequately reported for more than 10 years of follow‐up, whereas the Branemark implant is the only endosseous design that has demonstrated acceptable 15‐year success rates.
Url:
DOI: 10.1111/j.1600-051X.1991.tb02319.x
Links to Exploration step
ISTEX:D568FF38E73C4C076ACE4C0F22A09D6C09131962Le document en format XML
<record><TEI wicri:istexFullTextTei="biblStruct"><teiHeader><fileDesc><titleStmt><title xml:lang="en">State of the art in oral implants</title><author><name sortKey="Albrektsson, Tomas" sort="Albrektsson, Tomas" uniqKey="Albrektsson T" first="Tomas" last="Albrektsson">Tomas Albrektsson</name><affiliation><mods:affiliation>Biomaterials Group, Department of Handicap Research, Gothenburg University, Brunnsgatan 2, S‐41312 Gothenburg, Sweden</mods:affiliation></affiliation><affiliation><mods:affiliation>Correspondence address: T. Albrektsson, Biomaterials Group, Department of Handicap Research, Gothenburg University, Brunnsgatan 2, S‐413 12 Gothenburg, Sweden</mods:affiliation></affiliation></author><author><name sortKey="Sennerby, Lars" sort="Sennerby, Lars" uniqKey="Sennerby L" first="Lars" last="Sennerby">Lars Sennerby</name><affiliation><mods:affiliation>Biomaterials Group, Department of Handicap Research, Gothenburg University, Brunnsgatan 2, S‐41312 Gothenburg, Sweden</mods:affiliation></affiliation></author></titleStmt><publicationStmt><idno type="wicri:source">ISTEX</idno><idno type="RBID">ISTEX:D568FF38E73C4C076ACE4C0F22A09D6C09131962</idno><date when="1991" year="1991">1991</date><idno type="doi">10.1111/j.1600-051X.1991.tb02319.x</idno><idno type="url">https://api.istex.fr/document/D568FF38E73C4C076ACE4C0F22A09D6C09131962/fulltext/pdf</idno><idno type="wicri:Area/Istex/Corpus">006A06</idno><idno type="wicri:explorRef" wicri:stream="Istex" wicri:step="Corpus" wicri:corpus="ISTEX">006A06</idno></publicationStmt><sourceDesc><biblStruct><analytic><title level="a" type="main">State of the art in oral implants</title><author><name sortKey="Albrektsson, Tomas" sort="Albrektsson, Tomas" uniqKey="Albrektsson T" first="Tomas" last="Albrektsson">Tomas Albrektsson</name><affiliation><mods:affiliation>Biomaterials Group, Department of Handicap Research, Gothenburg University, Brunnsgatan 2, S‐41312 Gothenburg, Sweden</mods:affiliation></affiliation><affiliation><mods:affiliation>Correspondence address: T. Albrektsson, Biomaterials Group, Department of Handicap Research, Gothenburg University, Brunnsgatan 2, S‐413 12 Gothenburg, Sweden</mods:affiliation></affiliation></author><author><name sortKey="Sennerby, Lars" sort="Sennerby, Lars" uniqKey="Sennerby L" first="Lars" last="Sennerby">Lars Sennerby</name><affiliation><mods:affiliation>Biomaterials Group, Department of Handicap Research, Gothenburg University, Brunnsgatan 2, S‐41312 Gothenburg, Sweden</mods:affiliation></affiliation></author></analytic><monogr></monogr><series><title level="j" type="main">Journal of Clinical Periodontology</title><title level="j" type="alt">JOURNAL OF CLINICAL PERIODONTOLOGY</title><idno type="ISSN">0303-6979</idno><idno type="eISSN">1600-051X</idno><imprint><biblScope unit="vol">18</biblScope><biblScope unit="issue">6</biblScope><biblScope unit="page" from="474">474</biblScope><biblScope unit="page" to="481">481</biblScope><biblScope unit="page-count">8</biblScope><publisher>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</publisher><pubPlace>Oxford, UK</pubPlace><date type="published" when="1991-07">1991-07</date></imprint><idno type="ISSN">0303-6979</idno></series></biblStruct></sourceDesc><seriesStmt><idno type="ISSN">0303-6979</idno></seriesStmt></fileDesc><profileDesc><textClass><keywords scheme="KwdEn" xml:lang="en"><term>Albrektsson</term><term>Albrektsson sennerby</term><term>Allgemeine grundlagen</term><term>Blade implants</term><term>Blade vent implants</term><term>Bodine yanase</term><term>Bone height</term><term>Bone loss</term><term>Branemark</term><term>Branemark implant</term><term>Bridge stability rate</term><term>Ceramic implants</term><term>Clinical data</term><term>Clinical results</term><term>Clinical standpoint</term><term>Consecutively</term><term>Consensus conference</term><term>Dent</term><term>Dental clinics</term><term>Dental implant</term><term>Dental implants</term><term>Edentulous</term><term>Edentulous jaws</term><term>Edentulous patients</term><term>Flemmig holtje</term><term>Georg thieme verlag</term><term>High success rate</term><term>Hollow basket implant</term><term>Human beings</term><term>Hydroxyapatite</term><term>Implant</term><term>Implant design</term><term>Implant devices</term><term>Implant mobility</term><term>Implant success</term><term>Implant system</term><term>Implant systems</term><term>Integral implants</term><term>Malmquist sennerby</term><term>Mandible</term><term>Mandibular</term><term>Mandibular implants</term><term>Many cases</term><term>Maxillofac</term><term>Mental foraminae</term><term>Multicenter</term><term>Multicenter study</term><term>Nobelpharma implants</term><term>Oral implant designs</term><term>Oral implant systems</term><term>Oral implants</term><term>Oral maxillofac</term><term>Orale implantologie</term><term>Osseointegrated</term><term>Other implant systems</term><term>Palm springs</term><term>Partial edentulism</term><term>Patient control</term><term>Preprosthetic surgery</term><term>Present authors</term><term>Present paper</term><term>Progressive saucerization</term><term>Prospective study</term><term>Prosthetic dentistry</term><term>Pure titanium</term><term>Quintessence publ</term><term>Range years</term><term>Retrospective study</term><term>Schnitman shulman</term><term>Sennerby</term><term>Shulman</term><term>Single replacements</term><term>Smith zarb</term><term>Smithloff fritz</term><term>Soft tissue</term><term>Staple</term><term>Subperiosteal</term><term>Subperiosteal implants</term><term>Success criteria</term><term>Success rate</term><term>Success rates</term><term>Surg</term><term>Survival figures</term><term>Survival rate</term><term>Titanium implants exfoliated</term><term>Transmandibular</term><term>Transmandibular implant</term><term>Tubingen</term><term>Valuable data</term><term>Zarb</term></keywords><keywords scheme="Teeft" xml:lang="en"><term>Albrektsson</term><term>Albrektsson sennerby</term><term>Allgemeine grundlagen</term><term>Blade implants</term><term>Blade vent implants</term><term>Bodine yanase</term><term>Bone height</term><term>Bone loss</term><term>Branemark</term><term>Branemark implant</term><term>Bridge stability rate</term><term>Ceramic implants</term><term>Clinical data</term><term>Clinical results</term><term>Clinical standpoint</term><term>Consecutively</term><term>Consensus conference</term><term>Dent</term><term>Dental clinics</term><term>Dental implant</term><term>Dental implants</term><term>Edentulous</term><term>Edentulous jaws</term><term>Edentulous patients</term><term>Flemmig holtje</term><term>Georg thieme verlag</term><term>High success rate</term><term>Hollow basket implant</term><term>Human beings</term><term>Hydroxyapatite</term><term>Implant</term><term>Implant design</term><term>Implant devices</term><term>Implant mobility</term><term>Implant success</term><term>Implant system</term><term>Implant systems</term><term>Integral implants</term><term>Malmquist sennerby</term><term>Mandible</term><term>Mandibular</term><term>Mandibular implants</term><term>Many cases</term><term>Maxillofac</term><term>Mental foraminae</term><term>Multicenter</term><term>Multicenter study</term><term>Nobelpharma implants</term><term>Oral implant designs</term><term>Oral implant systems</term><term>Oral implants</term><term>Oral maxillofac</term><term>Orale implantologie</term><term>Osseointegrated</term><term>Other implant systems</term><term>Palm springs</term><term>Partial edentulism</term><term>Patient control</term><term>Preprosthetic surgery</term><term>Present authors</term><term>Present paper</term><term>Progressive saucerization</term><term>Prospective study</term><term>Prosthetic dentistry</term><term>Pure titanium</term><term>Quintessence publ</term><term>Range years</term><term>Retrospective study</term><term>Schnitman shulman</term><term>Sennerby</term><term>Shulman</term><term>Single replacements</term><term>Smith zarb</term><term>Smithloff fritz</term><term>Soft tissue</term><term>Staple</term><term>Subperiosteal</term><term>Subperiosteal implants</term><term>Success criteria</term><term>Success rate</term><term>Success rates</term><term>Surg</term><term>Survival figures</term><term>Survival rate</term><term>Titanium implants exfoliated</term><term>Transmandibular</term><term>Transmandibular implant</term><term>Tubingen</term><term>Valuable data</term><term>Zarb</term></keywords></textClass></profileDesc></teiHeader><front><div type="abstract">Abstract. Uncontrolled oral implant devices are still being widely used. The documentation of most oral implant systems is poorly backed up or not followed up for an adequate time period. Success rates are being quoted without reference to any defined success criteria. Frequently used oral implant designs such as the Core‐Vent, IMZ and Calcitek hydroxyapatite coated implants are in neither case supported by any adequate clinical reports from minimally 5‐years of follow‐up. Other implant systems such as the ITI, some subperiosteal designs and the Tubingen implant demonstrate well‐controlled and acceptable 5‐year data but are not followed up in a sufficient number or have demonstrated less good results in the 10‐year evaluation. The Small transosteal staple has been adequately reported for more than 10 years of follow‐up, whereas the Branemark implant is the only endosseous design that has demonstrated acceptable 15‐year success rates.</div></front></TEI><istex><corpusName>wiley</corpusName><keywords><teeft><json:string>implant</json:string><json:string>albrektsson</json:string><json:string>oral implants</json:string><json:string>branemark</json:string><json:string>success criteria</json:string><json:string>success rates</json:string><json:string>zarb</json:string><json:string>maxillofac</json:string><json:string>consecutively</json:string><json:string>mandibular</json:string><json:string>success rate</json:string><json:string>sennerby</json:string><json:string>oral maxillofac</json:string><json:string>osseointegrated</json:string><json:string>subperiosteal</json:string><json:string>shulman</json:string><json:string>surg</json:string><json:string>mandible</json:string><json:string>transmandibular</json:string><json:string>dental implants</json:string><json:string>multicenter</json:string><json:string>tubingen</json:string><json:string>hydroxyapatite</json:string><json:string>branemark implant</json:string><json:string>bone loss</json:string><json:string>implant success</json:string><json:string>smith zarb</json:string><json:string>survival rate</json:string><json:string>edentulous</json:string><json:string>subperiosteal implants</json:string><json:string>present authors</json:string><json:string>implant systems</json:string><json:string>staple</json:string><json:string>soft tissue</json:string><json:string>edentulous patients</json:string><json:string>bodine yanase</json:string><json:string>schnitman shulman</json:string><json:string>georg thieme verlag</json:string><json:string>orale implantologie</json:string><json:string>mental foraminae</json:string><json:string>transmandibular implant</json:string><json:string>blade implants</json:string><json:string>multicenter study</json:string><json:string>clinical results</json:string><json:string>range years</json:string><json:string>smithloff fritz</json:string><json:string>implant mobility</json:string><json:string>progressive saucerization</json:string><json:string>single replacements</json:string><json:string>consensus conference</json:string><json:string>retrospective study</json:string><json:string>implant design</json:string><json:string>prospective study</json:string><json:string>valuable data</json:string><json:string>survival figures</json:string><json:string>patient control</json:string><json:string>malmquist sennerby</json:string><json:string>high success rate</json:string><json:string>bone height</json:string><json:string>pure titanium</json:string><json:string>present paper</json:string><json:string>flemmig holtje</json:string><json:string>hollow basket implant</json:string><json:string>many cases</json:string><json:string>albrektsson sennerby</json:string><json:string>nobelpharma implants</json:string><json:string>mandibular implants</json:string><json:string>blade vent implants</json:string><json:string>bridge stability rate</json:string><json:string>human beings</json:string><json:string>implant system</json:string><json:string>integral implants</json:string><json:string>clinical data</json:string><json:string>edentulous jaws</json:string><json:string>prosthetic dentistry</json:string><json:string>dental clinics</json:string><json:string>quintessence publ</json:string><json:string>preprosthetic surgery</json:string><json:string>palm springs</json:string><json:string>clinical standpoint</json:string><json:string>other implant systems</json:string><json:string>oral implant designs</json:string><json:string>ceramic implants</json:string><json:string>dental implant</json:string><json:string>titanium implants exfoliated</json:string><json:string>allgemeine grundlagen</json:string><json:string>oral implant systems</json:string><json:string>implant devices</json:string><json:string>partial edentulism</json:string><json:string>dent</json:string></teeft></keywords><author><json:item><name>Tomas Albrektsson</name><affiliations><json:string>Biomaterials Group, Department of Handicap Research, Gothenburg University, Brunnsgatan 2, S‐41312 Gothenburg, Sweden</json:string><json:string>Correspondence address: T. Albrektsson, Biomaterials Group, Department of Handicap Research, Gothenburg University, Brunnsgatan 2, S‐413 12 Gothenburg, Sweden</json:string></affiliations></json:item><json:item><name>Lars Sennerby</name><affiliations><json:string>Biomaterials Group, Department of Handicap Research, Gothenburg University, Brunnsgatan 2, S‐41312 Gothenburg, Sweden</json:string></affiliations></json:item></author><subject><json:item><lang><json:string>eng</json:string></lang><value>oral implants</value></json:item><json:item><lang><json:string>eng</json:string></lang><value>success criteria</value></json:item><json:item><lang><json:string>eng</json:string></lang><value>clinical outcome</value></json:item></subject><articleId><json:string>JCPE474</json:string></articleId><arkIstex>ark:/67375/WNG-9K7HB271-R</arkIstex><language><json:string>eng</json:string></language><originalGenre><json:string>article</json:string></originalGenre><abstract>Abstract. Uncontrolled oral implant devices are still being widely used. The documentation of most oral implant systems is poorly backed up or not followed up for an adequate time period. Success rates are being quoted without reference to any defined success criteria. Frequently used oral implant designs such as the Core‐Vent, IMZ and Calcitek hydroxyapatite coated implants are in neither case supported by any adequate clinical reports from minimally 5‐years of follow‐up. Other implant systems such as the ITI, some subperiosteal designs and the Tubingen implant demonstrate well‐controlled and acceptable 5‐year data but are not followed up in a sufficient number or have demonstrated less good results in the 10‐year evaluation. The Small transosteal staple has been adequately reported for more than 10 years of follow‐up, whereas the Branemark implant is the only endosseous design that has demonstrated acceptable 15‐year success rates.</abstract><qualityIndicators><score>8.704</score><pdfWordCount>5995</pdfWordCount><pdfCharCount>35785</pdfCharCount><pdfVersion>1.4</pdfVersion><pdfPageCount>9</pdfPageCount><pdfPageSize>673 x 970 pts</pdfPageSize><refBibsNative>true</refBibsNative><abstractWordCount>142</abstractWordCount><abstractCharCount>947</abstractCharCount><keywordCount>3</keywordCount></qualityIndicators><title>State of the art in oral implants</title><pmid><json:string>1890231</json:string></pmid><genre><json:string>article</json:string></genre><host><title>Journal of Clinical Periodontology</title><language><json:string>unknown</json:string></language><doi><json:string>10.1111/(ISSN)1600-051X</json:string></doi><issn><json:string>0303-6979</json:string></issn><eissn><json:string>1600-051X</json:string></eissn><publisherId><json:string>JCPE</json:string></publisherId><volume>18</volume><issue>6</issue><pages><first>474</first><last>481</last><total>8</total></pages><genre><json:string>journal</json:string></genre></host><namedEntities><unitex><date><json:string>1992</json:string><json:string>1990s</json:string><json:string>1986</json:string><json:string>1960s</json:string><json:string>3088</json:string><json:string>1988</json:string><json:string>1990</json:string><json:string>1401</json:string><json:string>70s</json:string><json:string>1991</json:string></date><geogName></geogName><orgName><json:string>American Dental Association</json:string><json:string>Sweden Albrektsson T</json:string><json:string>American FDA</json:string></orgName><orgName_funder></orgName_funder><orgName_provider></orgName_provider><persName><json:string>Van Dijk</json:string><json:string>Lars Sennerby</json:string></persName><placeName><json:string>America</json:string></placeName><ref_url></ref_url><ref_bibl><json:string>Liithy et al. (1987)</json:string><json:string>Shulman et al. (1986)</json:string><json:string>Maxson et al. 1989</json:string><json:string>Davenport et al. 1985</json:string><json:string>Cranin et al. (1982)</json:string><json:string>Maeglin (1988)</json:string><json:string>Albrektsson et al. (1988a, b)</json:string><json:string>Zarb (1989)</json:string><json:string>Krekeler (1988)</json:string><json:string>Mercier et al. (1981)</json:string><json:string>Branemark et al. 1985</json:string><json:string>Mito et al. 1989</json:string><json:string>James et al. (1988)</json:string><json:string>Sawa et al. (1980)</json:string><json:string>James et al. 1988</json:string><json:string>Albrektsson et al. 1986</json:string><json:string>Schrdder et al. 1988</json:string><json:string>Cranin et al, (1987)</json:string><json:string>James et al, (1988)</json:string><json:string>Lill et al. (1988)</json:string><json:string>McGlumphy et al. (1989)</json:string><json:string>Albrektsson et al (1986)</json:string><json:string>1987, 1989</json:string><json:string>Schnitman et al. 1988</json:string><json:string>Lemons et al. (1989)</json:string><json:string>Koth et al, (1988)</json:string><json:string>Branemark et al. (1977)</json:string><json:string>Albrektsson et al.</json:string><json:string>Moy (1987)</json:string><json:string>Albrektsson et al. (1986)</json:string><json:string>Schroder et al. 1988</json:string><json:string>Nevins et al. 1989</json:string><json:string>McKinney et al. (1984)</json:string><json:string>Liithy & Strub 1988</json:string><json:string>Golec (1988)</json:string><json:string>Kondell 1989</json:string><json:string>Patrick et al. (1989)</json:string><json:string>Powers et al. 1989</json:string><json:string>Buser et al. 1988</json:string><json:string>1982, 1987</json:string><json:string>Adell et al. 1981</json:string><json:string>AlbreJctsson et al. (1986)</json:string><json:string>Van Steenberghe et al. (1989)</json:string><json:string>Lekholm (1989)</json:string><json:string>Dennisen et al. (1989)</json:string><json:string>Kondell et al. (1988)</json:string><json:string>Steflik et al. 1988</json:string></ref_bibl><bibl></bibl></unitex></namedEntities><ark><json:string>ark:/67375/WNG-9K7HB271-R</json:string></ark><categories><wos><json:string>1 - science</json:string><json:string>2 - dentistry, oral surgery & medicine</json:string></wos><scienceMetrix><json:string>1 - health sciences</json:string><json:string>2 - clinical medicine</json:string><json:string>3 - dentistry</json:string></scienceMetrix><scopus><json:string>1 - Health Sciences</json:string><json:string>2 - Dentistry</json:string><json:string>3 - Periodontics</json:string></scopus></categories><publicationDate>1991</publicationDate><copyrightDate>1991</copyrightDate><doi><json:string>10.1111/j.1600-051X.1991.tb02319.x</json:string></doi><id>D568FF38E73C4C076ACE4C0F22A09D6C09131962</id><score>1</score><fulltext><json:item><extension>pdf</extension><original>true</original><mimetype>application/pdf</mimetype><uri>https://api.istex.fr/document/D568FF38E73C4C076ACE4C0F22A09D6C09131962/fulltext/pdf</uri></json:item><json:item><extension>zip</extension><original>false</original><mimetype>application/zip</mimetype><uri>https://api.istex.fr/document/D568FF38E73C4C076ACE4C0F22A09D6C09131962/fulltext/zip</uri></json:item><istex:fulltextTEI uri="https://api.istex.fr/document/D568FF38E73C4C076ACE4C0F22A09D6C09131962/fulltext/tei"><teiHeader><fileDesc><titleStmt><title level="a" type="main">State of the art in oral implants</title></titleStmt><publicationStmt><authority>ISTEX</authority><publisher>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</publisher><pubPlace>Oxford, UK</pubPlace><date type="published" when="1991-07"></date></publicationStmt><notesStmt><note type="content-type" subtype="article" source="article" scheme="https://content-type.data.istex.fr/ark:/67375/XTP-6N5SZHKN-D">article</note><note type="publication-type" subtype="journal" scheme="https://publication-type.data.istex.fr/ark:/67375/JMC-0GLKJH51-B">journal</note></notesStmt><sourceDesc><biblStruct type="article"><analytic><title level="a" type="main">State of the art in oral implants</title><author xml:id="author-0000" role="corresp"><persName><forename type="first">Tomas</forename><surname>Albrektsson</surname></persName><affiliation>Biomaterials Group, Department of Handicap Research, Gothenburg University, Brunnsgatan 2, S‐41312 Gothenburg, Sweden<address><country key="SE"></country></address></affiliation><affiliation>T. Albrektsson, Biomaterials Group, Department of Handicap Research, Gothenburg University, Brunnsgatan 2, S‐413 12 Gothenburg, Sweden</affiliation></author><author xml:id="author-0001"><persName><forename type="first">Lars</forename><surname>Sennerby</surname></persName><affiliation>Biomaterials Group, Department of Handicap Research, Gothenburg University, Brunnsgatan 2, S‐41312 Gothenburg, Sweden<address><country key="SE"></country></address></affiliation></author><idno type="istex">D568FF38E73C4C076ACE4C0F22A09D6C09131962</idno><idno type="ark">ark:/67375/WNG-9K7HB271-R</idno><idno type="DOI">10.1111/j.1600-051X.1991.tb02319.x</idno><idno type="unit">JCPE474</idno><idno type="toTypesetVersion">file:JCPE.JCPE474.pdf</idno></analytic><monogr><title level="j" type="main">Journal of Clinical Periodontology</title><title level="j" type="alt">JOURNAL OF CLINICAL PERIODONTOLOGY</title><idno type="pISSN">0303-6979</idno><idno type="eISSN">1600-051X</idno><idno type="book-DOI">10.1111/(ISSN)1600-051X</idno><idno type="book-part-DOI">10.1111/cpe.1991.18.issue-6</idno><idno type="product">JCPE</idno><idno type="publisherDivision">ST</idno><imprint><biblScope unit="vol">18</biblScope><biblScope unit="issue">6</biblScope><biblScope unit="page" from="474">474</biblScope><biblScope unit="page" to="481">481</biblScope><biblScope unit="page-count">8</biblScope><publisher>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</publisher><pubPlace>Oxford, UK</pubPlace><date type="published" when="1991-07"></date></imprint></monogr></biblStruct></sourceDesc></fileDesc><profileDesc><abstract xml:lang="en" style="main"><p><hi rend="bold">Abstract. </hi> Uncontrolled oral implant devices are still being widely used. The documentation of most oral implant systems is poorly backed up or not followed up for an adequate time period. Success rates are being quoted without reference to any defined success criteria. Frequently used oral implant designs such as the Core‐Vent, IMZ and Calcitek hydroxyapatite coated implants are in neither case supported by any adequate clinical reports from minimally 5‐years of follow‐up. Other implant systems such as the ITI, some subperiosteal designs and the Tubingen implant demonstrate well‐controlled and acceptable 5‐year data but are not followed up in a sufficient number or have demonstrated less good results in the 10‐year evaluation. The Small transosteal staple has been adequately reported for more than 10 years of follow‐up, whereas the Branemark implant is the only endosseous design that has demonstrated acceptable 15‐year success rates.</p></abstract><textClass><keywords xml:lang="en"><term xml:id="k1">oral implants</term><term xml:id="k2">success criteria</term><term xml:id="k3">clinical outcome</term></keywords><keywords rend="tocHeading1"><term>Original Articles</term></keywords></textClass><langUsage><language ident="en"></language></langUsage></profileDesc></teiHeader></istex:fulltextTEI><json:item><extension>txt</extension><original>false</original><mimetype>text/plain</mimetype><uri>https://api.istex.fr/document/D568FF38E73C4C076ACE4C0F22A09D6C09131962/fulltext/txt</uri></json:item></fulltext><metadata><istex:metadataXml wicri:clean="Wiley, elements deleted: body"><istex:xmlDeclaration>version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" standalone="yes"</istex:xmlDeclaration><istex:document><component version="2.0" type="serialArticle" xml:lang="en"><header><publicationMeta level="product"><publisherInfo><publisherName>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</publisherName><publisherLoc>Oxford, UK</publisherLoc></publisherInfo><doi origin="wiley" registered="yes">10.1111/(ISSN)1600-051X</doi><issn type="print">0303-6979</issn><issn type="electronic">1600-051X</issn><idGroup><id type="product" value="JCPE"></id><id type="publisherDivision" value="ST"></id></idGroup><titleGroup><title type="main" sort="JOURNAL OF CLINICAL PERIODONTOLOGY">Journal of Clinical Periodontology</title></titleGroup></publicationMeta><publicationMeta level="part" position="07006"><doi origin="wiley">10.1111/cpe.1991.18.issue-6</doi><numberingGroup><numbering type="journalVolume" number="18">18</numbering><numbering type="journalIssue" number="6">6</numbering></numberingGroup><coverDate startDate="1991-07">July 1991</coverDate></publicationMeta><publicationMeta level="unit" type="article" position="0047400" status="forIssue"><doi origin="wiley">10.1111/j.1600-051X.1991.tb02319.x</doi><idGroup><id type="unit" value="JCPE474"></id></idGroup><countGroup><count type="pageTotal" number="8"></count></countGroup><titleGroup><title type="tocHeading1">Original Articles</title></titleGroup><eventGroup><event type="firstOnline" date="2005-12-13"></event><event type="publishedOnlineFinalForm" date="2005-12-13"></event><event type="xmlConverted" agent="Converter:BPG_TO_WML3G version:2.3.2 mode:FullText source:HeaderRef result:HeaderRef" date="2010-03-09"></event><event type="xmlConverted" agent="Converter:WILEY_ML3G_TO_WILEY_ML3GV2 version:4.0.1" date="2014-03-19"></event><event type="xmlConverted" agent="Converter:WML3G_To_WML3G version:4.1.7 mode:FullText,remove_FC" date="2014-10-24"></event></eventGroup><numberingGroup><numbering type="pageFirst" number="474">474</numbering><numbering type="pageLast" number="481">481</numbering></numberingGroup><correspondenceTo>T. Albrektsson, Biomaterials Group, Department of Handicap Research, Gothenburg University, Brunnsgatan 2, S‐413 12 Gothenburg, Sweden</correspondenceTo><linkGroup><link type="toTypesetVersion" href="file:JCPE.JCPE474.pdf"></link></linkGroup></publicationMeta><contentMeta><unparsedEditorialHistory>Accepted for publication 5 June 1990</unparsedEditorialHistory><countGroup><count type="referenceTotal" number="57"></count><count type="linksCrossRef" number="3"></count></countGroup><titleGroup><title type="main">State of the art in oral implants</title></titleGroup><creators><creator creatorRole="author" xml:id="cr1" affiliationRef="#a1" corresponding="yes"><personName><givenNames>Tomas</givenNames><familyName>Albrektsson</familyName></personName></creator><creator creatorRole="author" xml:id="cr2" affiliationRef="#a1"><personName><givenNames>Lars</givenNames><familyName>Sennerby</familyName></personName></creator></creators><affiliationGroup><affiliation xml:id="a1" countryCode="SE"><unparsedAffiliation>Biomaterials Group, Department of Handicap Research, Gothenburg University, Brunnsgatan 2, S‐41312 Gothenburg, Sweden</unparsedAffiliation></affiliation></affiliationGroup><keywordGroup xml:lang="en"><keyword xml:id="k1">oral implants</keyword><keyword xml:id="k2">success criteria</keyword><keyword xml:id="k3">clinical outcome</keyword></keywordGroup><abstractGroup><abstract type="main" xml:lang="en"><p><b>Abstract. </b> Uncontrolled oral implant devices are still being widely used. The documentation of most oral implant systems is poorly backed up or not followed up for an adequate time period. Success rates are being quoted without reference to any defined success criteria. Frequently used oral implant designs such as the Core‐Vent, IMZ and Calcitek hydroxyapatite coated implants are in neither case supported by any adequate clinical reports from minimally 5‐years of follow‐up. Other implant systems such as the ITI, some subperiosteal designs and the Tubingen implant demonstrate well‐controlled and acceptable 5‐year data but are not followed up in a sufficient number or have demonstrated less good results in the 10‐year evaluation. The Small transosteal staple has been adequately reported for more than 10 years of follow‐up, whereas the Branemark implant is the only endosseous design that has demonstrated acceptable 15‐year success rates.</p></abstract></abstractGroup></contentMeta></header></component></istex:document></istex:metadataXml><mods version="3.6"><titleInfo lang="en"><title>State of the art in oral implants</title></titleInfo><titleInfo type="alternative" contentType="CDATA" lang="en"><title>State of the art in oral implants</title></titleInfo><name type="personal"><namePart type="given">Tomas</namePart><namePart type="family">Albrektsson</namePart><affiliation>Biomaterials Group, Department of Handicap Research, Gothenburg University, Brunnsgatan 2, S‐41312 Gothenburg, Sweden</affiliation><affiliation>Correspondence address: T. Albrektsson, Biomaterials Group, Department of Handicap Research, Gothenburg University, Brunnsgatan 2, S‐413 12 Gothenburg, Sweden</affiliation><role><roleTerm type="text">author</roleTerm></role></name><name type="personal"><namePart type="given">Lars</namePart><namePart type="family">Sennerby</namePart><affiliation>Biomaterials Group, Department of Handicap Research, Gothenburg University, Brunnsgatan 2, S‐41312 Gothenburg, Sweden</affiliation><role><roleTerm type="text">author</roleTerm></role></name><typeOfResource>text</typeOfResource><genre type="article" displayLabel="article" authority="ISTEX" authorityURI="https://content-type.data.istex.fr" valueURI="https://content-type.data.istex.fr/ark:/67375/XTP-6N5SZHKN-D">article</genre><originInfo><publisher>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</publisher><place><placeTerm type="text">Oxford, UK</placeTerm></place><dateIssued encoding="w3cdtf">1991-07</dateIssued><edition>Accepted for publication 5 June 1990</edition><copyrightDate encoding="w3cdtf">1991</copyrightDate></originInfo><language><languageTerm type="code" authority="rfc3066">en</languageTerm><languageTerm type="code" authority="iso639-2b">eng</languageTerm></language><physicalDescription><extent unit="references">57</extent><extent unit="linksCrossRef">3</extent></physicalDescription><abstract>Abstract. Uncontrolled oral implant devices are still being widely used. The documentation of most oral implant systems is poorly backed up or not followed up for an adequate time period. Success rates are being quoted without reference to any defined success criteria. Frequently used oral implant designs such as the Core‐Vent, IMZ and Calcitek hydroxyapatite coated implants are in neither case supported by any adequate clinical reports from minimally 5‐years of follow‐up. Other implant systems such as the ITI, some subperiosteal designs and the Tubingen implant demonstrate well‐controlled and acceptable 5‐year data but are not followed up in a sufficient number or have demonstrated less good results in the 10‐year evaluation. The Small transosteal staple has been adequately reported for more than 10 years of follow‐up, whereas the Branemark implant is the only endosseous design that has demonstrated acceptable 15‐year success rates.</abstract><subject lang="en"><genre>keywords</genre><topic>oral implants</topic><topic>success criteria</topic><topic>clinical outcome</topic></subject><relatedItem type="host"><titleInfo><title>Journal of Clinical Periodontology</title></titleInfo><genre type="journal" authority="ISTEX" authorityURI="https://publication-type.data.istex.fr" valueURI="https://publication-type.data.istex.fr/ark:/67375/JMC-0GLKJH51-B">journal</genre><identifier type="ISSN">0303-6979</identifier><identifier type="eISSN">1600-051X</identifier><identifier type="DOI">10.1111/(ISSN)1600-051X</identifier><identifier type="PublisherID">JCPE</identifier><part><date>1991</date><detail type="volume"><caption>vol.</caption><number>18</number></detail><detail type="issue"><caption>no.</caption><number>6</number></detail><extent unit="pages"><start>474</start><end>481</end><total>8</total></extent></part></relatedItem><identifier type="istex">D568FF38E73C4C076ACE4C0F22A09D6C09131962</identifier><identifier type="ark">ark:/67375/WNG-9K7HB271-R</identifier><identifier type="DOI">10.1111/j.1600-051X.1991.tb02319.x</identifier><identifier type="ArticleID">JCPE474</identifier><recordInfo><recordContentSource authority="ISTEX" authorityURI="https://loaded-corpus.data.istex.fr" valueURI="https://loaded-corpus.data.istex.fr/ark:/67375/XBH-L0C46X92-X">wiley</recordContentSource><recordOrigin>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</recordOrigin></recordInfo></mods><json:item><extension>json</extension><original>false</original><mimetype>application/json</mimetype><uri>https://api.istex.fr/document/D568FF38E73C4C076ACE4C0F22A09D6C09131962/metadata/json</uri></json:item></metadata><serie></serie></istex></record>Pour manipuler ce document sous Unix (Dilib)
EXPLOR_STEP=$WICRI_ROOT/Wicri/Santé/explor/EdenteV2/Data/Istex/Corpus
HfdSelect -h $EXPLOR_STEP/biblio.hfd -nk 006A06 | SxmlIndent | more
Ou
HfdSelect -h $EXPLOR_AREA/Data/Istex/Corpus/biblio.hfd -nk 006A06 | SxmlIndent | more
Pour mettre un lien sur cette page dans le réseau Wicri
{{Explor lien
|wiki= Wicri/Santé
|area= EdenteV2
|flux= Istex
|étape= Corpus
|type= RBID
|clé= ISTEX:D568FF38E73C4C076ACE4C0F22A09D6C09131962
|texte= State of the art in oral implants
}}
| This area was generated with Dilib version V0.6.32. |  |