Dentist‐related factors influencing the amount of prosthodontic treatment provided
Identifieur interne : 006A03 ( Istex/Corpus ); précédent : 006A02; suivant : 006A04Dentist‐related factors influencing the amount of prosthodontic treatment provided
Auteurs : Mats Kronström ; Sigvard Palmqvist ; Björn Söderfeldt ; Gunnar E. CarlssonSource :
- Community Dentistry and Oral Epidemiology [ 0301-5661 ] ; 2000-06.
English descriptors
- KwdEn :
- Community dent, Demographic attributes, Dent, Dental care, Dental school, Dentist, Dentist delegation patient information patient, Dentistry, Denture, Dependent variables, Favorable attitude, Female dentists, Fpd, Gender, General dentists, Good income, Health service, High production, Higher production, Independent variables, Kronstrom, Likert scale, Logistic, Logistic regression model, Logistic regression models, Lower production, Male dentists, Malmo, Multiple regression models, Odds ratio, Other people, Other variables, Partial dentures, Pdhs, Pdhs dentists, Pdhs years, Present study, Private practice, Private practitioners, Profession size, Prosthetic dentistry, Prosthodontic, Prosthodontic services, Prosthodontic treatment, Prosthodontic units, Prosthodontics, Random sample, Reference category, Regression, Regression analysis, Removable, Removable dentures, Separate models, Single crowns, Situation treatment discussion, Stockholm gothenburg malmo, Total model, Treatment comprehensiveness.
- Teeft :
- Community dent, Demographic attributes, Dent, Dental care, Dental school, Dentist, Dentist delegation patient information patient, Dentistry, Denture, Dependent variables, Favorable attitude, Female dentists, Fpd, Gender, General dentists, Good income, Health service, High production, Higher production, Independent variables, Kronstrom, Likert scale, Logistic, Logistic regression model, Logistic regression models, Lower production, Male dentists, Malmo, Multiple regression models, Odds ratio, Other people, Other variables, Partial dentures, Pdhs, Pdhs dentists, Pdhs years, Present study, Private practice, Private practitioners, Profession size, Prosthetic dentistry, Prosthodontic, Prosthodontic services, Prosthodontic treatment, Prosthodontic units, Prosthodontics, Random sample, Reference category, Regression, Regression analysis, Removable, Removable dentures, Separate models, Single crowns, Situation treatment discussion, Stockholm gothenburg malmo, Total model, Treatment comprehensiveness.
Abstract
Abstract – Objectives: To evaluate, using multivariate methods, the associations between indicators of the amount of prosthodontic treatment and dentist‐related factors. Methods: Questionnaires were sent to a random sample of 2059 general dentists, response rate was 76%. Two indicators of prosthodontic activity were used as dependent variables: 1) reported weekly working hours used for prosthodontics and 2) reported numbers of produced single crowns, fixed partial dentures, and removable dentures. Independent variables were ‘social and demographic attributes’, ‘job situation’ and ‘attitudes of dentists’. Multiple regression analysis was used in models with continuous dependent variables and logistic regression analysis for categorical dependent variables. Results:‘Weekly working hours used for dental care of adults’ showed a strong association in all models with the dependent variable ‘weekly working hours used for prosthodontics’. Male dentists provided more prosthodontic services than female dentists, even if reporting less time used for prosthodontics. Private practitioners produced more fixed prosthodontics than dentists employed in the public dental health service. Dentists in the public dental health service reported a higher production of removable dentures than private practitioners. Conclusion: The results indicate that factors, besides those in the rational clinical model for decision‐making, e.g. gender and delivery system, play a role in the provision of prosthodontic services.
Url:
DOI: 10.1034/j.1600-0528.2000.280304.x
Links to Exploration step
ISTEX:D547097C1E7C028CFF3ACE123A902875C640DEF0Le document en format XML
<record><TEI wicri:istexFullTextTei="biblStruct"><teiHeader><fileDesc><titleStmt><title xml:lang="en">Dentist‐related factors influencing the amount of prosthodontic treatment provided</title><author><name sortKey="Kronstrom, Mats" sort="Kronstrom, Mats" uniqKey="Kronstrom M" first="Mats" last="Kronström">Mats Kronström</name><affiliation><mods:affiliation>Department of Prosthetic Dentistry, Central Hospital, Skövde, Sweden</mods:affiliation></affiliation><affiliation><mods:affiliation>Department of Prosthetic Dentistry, Lund University, Malmö, Sweden</mods:affiliation></affiliation></author><author><name sortKey="Palmqvist, Sigvard" sort="Palmqvist, Sigvard" uniqKey="Palmqvist S" first="Sigvard" last="Palmqvist">Sigvard Palmqvist</name><affiliation><mods:affiliation>Department of Prosthetic Dentistry, Lund University, Malmö, Sweden</mods:affiliation></affiliation><affiliation><mods:affiliation>Department of Prosthetic Dentistry, Copenhagen University, Copenhagen, Denmark</mods:affiliation></affiliation></author><author><name sortKey="Soderfeldt, Bjorn" sort="Soderfeldt, Bjorn" uniqKey="Soderfeldt B" first="Björn" last="Söderfeldt">Björn Söderfeldt</name><affiliation><mods:affiliation>Department of Dental Public Health, Lund University, Malmö, Sweden</mods:affiliation></affiliation></author><author><name sortKey="Carlsson, Gunnar E" sort="Carlsson, Gunnar E" uniqKey="Carlsson G" first="Gunnar E." last="Carlsson">Gunnar E. Carlsson</name><affiliation><mods:affiliation>Department of Prosthetic Dentistry, Göteborg University, Gothenburg, Sweden</mods:affiliation></affiliation></author></titleStmt><publicationStmt><idno type="wicri:source">ISTEX</idno><idno type="RBID">ISTEX:D547097C1E7C028CFF3ACE123A902875C640DEF0</idno><date when="2000" year="2000">2000</date><idno type="doi">10.1034/j.1600-0528.2000.280304.x</idno><idno type="url">https://api.istex.fr/document/D547097C1E7C028CFF3ACE123A902875C640DEF0/fulltext/pdf</idno><idno type="wicri:Area/Istex/Corpus">006A03</idno><idno type="wicri:explorRef" wicri:stream="Istex" wicri:step="Corpus" wicri:corpus="ISTEX">006A03</idno></publicationStmt><sourceDesc><biblStruct><analytic><title level="a" type="main">Dentist‐related factors influencing the amount of prosthodontic treatment provided</title><author><name sortKey="Kronstrom, Mats" sort="Kronstrom, Mats" uniqKey="Kronstrom M" first="Mats" last="Kronström">Mats Kronström</name><affiliation><mods:affiliation>Department of Prosthetic Dentistry, Central Hospital, Skövde, Sweden</mods:affiliation></affiliation><affiliation><mods:affiliation>Department of Prosthetic Dentistry, Lund University, Malmö, Sweden</mods:affiliation></affiliation></author><author><name sortKey="Palmqvist, Sigvard" sort="Palmqvist, Sigvard" uniqKey="Palmqvist S" first="Sigvard" last="Palmqvist">Sigvard Palmqvist</name><affiliation><mods:affiliation>Department of Prosthetic Dentistry, Lund University, Malmö, Sweden</mods:affiliation></affiliation><affiliation><mods:affiliation>Department of Prosthetic Dentistry, Copenhagen University, Copenhagen, Denmark</mods:affiliation></affiliation></author><author><name sortKey="Soderfeldt, Bjorn" sort="Soderfeldt, Bjorn" uniqKey="Soderfeldt B" first="Björn" last="Söderfeldt">Björn Söderfeldt</name><affiliation><mods:affiliation>Department of Dental Public Health, Lund University, Malmö, Sweden</mods:affiliation></affiliation></author><author><name sortKey="Carlsson, Gunnar E" sort="Carlsson, Gunnar E" uniqKey="Carlsson G" first="Gunnar E." last="Carlsson">Gunnar E. Carlsson</name><affiliation><mods:affiliation>Department of Prosthetic Dentistry, Göteborg University, Gothenburg, Sweden</mods:affiliation></affiliation></author></analytic><monogr></monogr><series><title level="j" type="main">Community Dentistry and Oral Epidemiology</title><title level="j" type="alt">COMMUNITY DENTISTRY ORAL EPIDEMIOLOGY</title><idno type="ISSN">0301-5661</idno><idno type="eISSN">1600-0528</idno><imprint><biblScope unit="vol">28</biblScope><biblScope unit="issue">3</biblScope><biblScope unit="page" from="185">185</biblScope><biblScope unit="page" to="194">194</biblScope><biblScope unit="page-count">10</biblScope><publisher>Munksgaard International Publishers</publisher><pubPlace>Copenhagen</pubPlace><date type="published" when="2000-06">2000-06</date></imprint><idno type="ISSN">0301-5661</idno></series></biblStruct></sourceDesc><seriesStmt><idno type="ISSN">0301-5661</idno></seriesStmt></fileDesc><profileDesc><textClass><keywords scheme="KwdEn" xml:lang="en"><term>Community dent</term><term>Demographic attributes</term><term>Dent</term><term>Dental care</term><term>Dental school</term><term>Dentist</term><term>Dentist delegation patient information patient</term><term>Dentistry</term><term>Denture</term><term>Dependent variables</term><term>Favorable attitude</term><term>Female dentists</term><term>Fpd</term><term>Gender</term><term>General dentists</term><term>Good income</term><term>Health service</term><term>High production</term><term>Higher production</term><term>Independent variables</term><term>Kronstrom</term><term>Likert scale</term><term>Logistic</term><term>Logistic regression model</term><term>Logistic regression models</term><term>Lower production</term><term>Male dentists</term><term>Malmo</term><term>Multiple regression models</term><term>Odds ratio</term><term>Other people</term><term>Other variables</term><term>Partial dentures</term><term>Pdhs</term><term>Pdhs dentists</term><term>Pdhs years</term><term>Present study</term><term>Private practice</term><term>Private practitioners</term><term>Profession size</term><term>Prosthetic dentistry</term><term>Prosthodontic</term><term>Prosthodontic services</term><term>Prosthodontic treatment</term><term>Prosthodontic units</term><term>Prosthodontics</term><term>Random sample</term><term>Reference category</term><term>Regression</term><term>Regression analysis</term><term>Removable</term><term>Removable dentures</term><term>Separate models</term><term>Single crowns</term><term>Situation treatment discussion</term><term>Stockholm gothenburg malmo</term><term>Total model</term><term>Treatment comprehensiveness</term></keywords><keywords scheme="Teeft" xml:lang="en"><term>Community dent</term><term>Demographic attributes</term><term>Dent</term><term>Dental care</term><term>Dental school</term><term>Dentist</term><term>Dentist delegation patient information patient</term><term>Dentistry</term><term>Denture</term><term>Dependent variables</term><term>Favorable attitude</term><term>Female dentists</term><term>Fpd</term><term>Gender</term><term>General dentists</term><term>Good income</term><term>Health service</term><term>High production</term><term>Higher production</term><term>Independent variables</term><term>Kronstrom</term><term>Likert scale</term><term>Logistic</term><term>Logistic regression model</term><term>Logistic regression models</term><term>Lower production</term><term>Male dentists</term><term>Malmo</term><term>Multiple regression models</term><term>Odds ratio</term><term>Other people</term><term>Other variables</term><term>Partial dentures</term><term>Pdhs</term><term>Pdhs dentists</term><term>Pdhs years</term><term>Present study</term><term>Private practice</term><term>Private practitioners</term><term>Profession size</term><term>Prosthetic dentistry</term><term>Prosthodontic</term><term>Prosthodontic services</term><term>Prosthodontic treatment</term><term>Prosthodontic units</term><term>Prosthodontics</term><term>Random sample</term><term>Reference category</term><term>Regression</term><term>Regression analysis</term><term>Removable</term><term>Removable dentures</term><term>Separate models</term><term>Single crowns</term><term>Situation treatment discussion</term><term>Stockholm gothenburg malmo</term><term>Total model</term><term>Treatment comprehensiveness</term></keywords></textClass></profileDesc></teiHeader><front><div type="abstract">Abstract – Objectives: To evaluate, using multivariate methods, the associations between indicators of the amount of prosthodontic treatment and dentist‐related factors. Methods: Questionnaires were sent to a random sample of 2059 general dentists, response rate was 76%. Two indicators of prosthodontic activity were used as dependent variables: 1) reported weekly working hours used for prosthodontics and 2) reported numbers of produced single crowns, fixed partial dentures, and removable dentures. Independent variables were ‘social and demographic attributes’, ‘job situation’ and ‘attitudes of dentists’. Multiple regression analysis was used in models with continuous dependent variables and logistic regression analysis for categorical dependent variables. Results:‘Weekly working hours used for dental care of adults’ showed a strong association in all models with the dependent variable ‘weekly working hours used for prosthodontics’. Male dentists provided more prosthodontic services than female dentists, even if reporting less time used for prosthodontics. Private practitioners produced more fixed prosthodontics than dentists employed in the public dental health service. Dentists in the public dental health service reported a higher production of removable dentures than private practitioners. Conclusion: The results indicate that factors, besides those in the rational clinical model for decision‐making, e.g. gender and delivery system, play a role in the provision of prosthodontic services.</div></front></TEI><istex><corpusName>wiley</corpusName><keywords><teeft><json:string>prosthodontic</json:string><json:string>prosthodontics</json:string><json:string>denture</json:string><json:string>female dentists</json:string><json:string>pdhs</json:string><json:string>dental care</json:string><json:string>fpd</json:string><json:string>removable dentures</json:string><json:string>kronstrom</json:string><json:string>single crowns</json:string><json:string>prosthodontic services</json:string><json:string>prosthodontic treatment</json:string><json:string>reference category</json:string><json:string>male dentists</json:string><json:string>removable</json:string><json:string>dental school</json:string><json:string>malmo</json:string><json:string>dentistry</json:string><json:string>demographic attributes</json:string><json:string>pdhs dentists</json:string><json:string>prosthodontic units</json:string><json:string>high production</json:string><json:string>health service</json:string><json:string>partial dentures</json:string><json:string>dependent variables</json:string><json:string>general dentists</json:string><json:string>independent variables</json:string><json:string>prosthetic dentistry</json:string><json:string>likert scale</json:string><json:string>logistic regression models</json:string><json:string>present study</json:string><json:string>total model</json:string><json:string>community dent</json:string><json:string>pdhs years</json:string><json:string>profession size</json:string><json:string>good income</json:string><json:string>stockholm gothenburg malmo</json:string><json:string>situation treatment discussion</json:string><json:string>treatment comprehensiveness</json:string><json:string>separate models</json:string><json:string>private practice</json:string><json:string>higher production</json:string><json:string>dentist</json:string><json:string>other people</json:string><json:string>random sample</json:string><json:string>favorable attitude</json:string><json:string>regression analysis</json:string><json:string>multiple regression models</json:string><json:string>dentist delegation patient information patient</json:string><json:string>private practitioners</json:string><json:string>lower production</json:string><json:string>logistic regression model</json:string><json:string>odds ratio</json:string><json:string>other variables</json:string><json:string>gender</json:string><json:string>logistic</json:string><json:string>dent</json:string><json:string>regression</json:string></teeft></keywords><author><json:item><name>Mats Kronström</name><affiliations><json:string>Department of Prosthetic Dentistry, Central Hospital, Skövde, Sweden</json:string><json:string>Department of Prosthetic Dentistry, Lund University, Malmö, Sweden</json:string></affiliations></json:item><json:item><name>Sigvard Palmqvist</name><affiliations><json:string>Department of Prosthetic Dentistry, Lund University, Malmö, Sweden</json:string><json:string>Department of Prosthetic Dentistry, Copenhagen University, Copenhagen, Denmark</json:string></affiliations></json:item><json:item><name>Björn Söderfeldt</name><affiliations><json:string>Department of Dental Public Health, Lund University, Malmö, Sweden</json:string></affiliations></json:item><json:item><name>Gunnar E. Carlsson</name><affiliations><json:string>Department of Prosthetic Dentistry, Göteborg University, Gothenburg, Sweden</json:string></affiliations></json:item></author><subject><json:item><lang><json:string>eng</json:string></lang><value>dental care</value></json:item><json:item><lang><json:string>eng</json:string></lang><value>prosthodontics</value></json:item><json:item><lang><json:string>eng</json:string></lang><value>regression analysis</value></json:item></subject><articleId><json:string>CDOE280304</json:string></articleId><arkIstex>ark:/67375/WNG-G58QW5GJ-P</arkIstex><language><json:string>eng</json:string></language><originalGenre><json:string>article</json:string></originalGenre><abstract>Abstract – Objectives: To evaluate, using multivariate methods, the associations between indicators of the amount of prosthodontic treatment and dentist‐related factors. Methods: Questionnaires were sent to a random sample of 2059 general dentists, response rate was 76%. Two indicators of prosthodontic activity were used as dependent variables: 1) reported weekly working hours used for prosthodontics and 2) reported numbers of produced single crowns, fixed partial dentures, and removable dentures. Independent variables were ‘social and demographic attributes’, ‘job situation’ and ‘attitudes of dentists’. Multiple regression analysis was used in models with continuous dependent variables and logistic regression analysis for categorical dependent variables. Results:‘Weekly working hours used for dental care of adults’ showed a strong association in all models with the dependent variable ‘weekly working hours used for prosthodontics’. Male dentists provided more prosthodontic services than female dentists, even if reporting less time used for prosthodontics. Private practitioners produced more fixed prosthodontics than dentists employed in the public dental health service. Dentists in the public dental health service reported a higher production of removable dentures than private practitioners. Conclusion: The results indicate that factors, besides those in the rational clinical model for decision‐making, e.g. gender and delivery system, play a role in the provision of prosthodontic services.</abstract><qualityIndicators><score>9.104</score><pdfWordCount>4644</pdfWordCount><pdfCharCount>32225</pdfCharCount><pdfVersion>1.2</pdfVersion><pdfPageCount>10</pdfPageCount><pdfPageSize>595 x 794 pts</pdfPageSize><refBibsNative>false</refBibsNative><abstractWordCount>205</abstractWordCount><abstractCharCount>1514</abstractCharCount><keywordCount>3</keywordCount></qualityIndicators><title>Dentist‐related factors influencing the amount of prosthodontic treatment provided</title><pmid><json:string>10830645</json:string></pmid><genre><json:string>article</json:string></genre><host><title>Community Dentistry and Oral Epidemiology</title><language><json:string>unknown</json:string></language><doi><json:string>10.1111/(ISSN)1600-0528</json:string></doi><issn><json:string>0301-5661</json:string></issn><eissn><json:string>1600-0528</json:string></eissn><publisherId><json:string>CDOE</json:string></publisherId><volume>28</volume><issue>3</issue><pages><first>185</first><last>194</last><total>10</total></pages><genre><json:string>journal</json:string></genre></host><namedEntities><unitex><date><json:string>2000</json:string><json:string>1</json:string><json:string>2059</json:string></date><geogName></geogName><orgName><json:string>Goteborg University</json:string><json:string>Lund University</json:string><json:string>Sweden Kronstrom</json:string><json:string>Department of Prosthetic</json:string><json:string>Department of Prosthetic Dentistry, Copenhagen University, Copenhagen, Denmark</json:string><json:string>Department of Dental Public Health, Lund University, Malmo, Sweden</json:string></orgName><orgName_funder></orgName_funder><orgName_provider></orgName_provider><persName><json:string>The</json:string><json:string>Umeå</json:string><json:string>E. Carlsson</json:string></persName><placeName><json:string>Malmo</json:string><json:string>Gothenburg</json:string><json:string>Stockholm</json:string><json:string>Umeå</json:string><json:string>Sweden</json:string></placeName><ref_url></ref_url><ref_bibl><json:string>Kronstrom et al.</json:string></ref_bibl><bibl></bibl></unitex></namedEntities><ark><json:string>ark:/67375/WNG-G58QW5GJ-P</json:string></ark><categories><wos><json:string>1 - social science</json:string><json:string>2 - public, environmental & occupational health</json:string><json:string>1 - science</json:string><json:string>2 - dentistry, oral surgery & medicine</json:string></wos><scienceMetrix><json:string>1 - health sciences</json:string><json:string>2 - clinical medicine</json:string><json:string>3 - dentistry</json:string></scienceMetrix><scopus><json:string>1 - Health Sciences</json:string><json:string>2 - Medicine</json:string><json:string>3 - Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health</json:string><json:string>1 - Health Sciences</json:string><json:string>2 - Dentistry</json:string><json:string>3 - General Dentistry</json:string></scopus></categories><publicationDate>2000</publicationDate><copyrightDate>2000</copyrightDate><doi><json:string>10.1034/j.1600-0528.2000.280304.x</json:string></doi><id>D547097C1E7C028CFF3ACE123A902875C640DEF0</id><score>1</score><fulltext><json:item><extension>pdf</extension><original>true</original><mimetype>application/pdf</mimetype><uri>https://api.istex.fr/document/D547097C1E7C028CFF3ACE123A902875C640DEF0/fulltext/pdf</uri></json:item><json:item><extension>zip</extension><original>false</original><mimetype>application/zip</mimetype><uri>https://api.istex.fr/document/D547097C1E7C028CFF3ACE123A902875C640DEF0/fulltext/zip</uri></json:item><istex:fulltextTEI uri="https://api.istex.fr/document/D547097C1E7C028CFF3ACE123A902875C640DEF0/fulltext/tei"><teiHeader><fileDesc><titleStmt><title level="a" type="main">Dentist‐related factors influencing the amount of prosthodontic treatment provided</title><respStmt><resp>Références bibliographiques récupérées via GROBID</resp><name resp="ISTEX-API">ISTEX-API (INIST-CNRS)</name></respStmt></titleStmt><publicationStmt><authority>ISTEX</authority><publisher>Munksgaard International Publishers</publisher><pubPlace>Copenhagen</pubPlace><date type="published" when="2000-06"></date></publicationStmt><notesStmt><note type="content-type" subtype="article" source="article" scheme="https://content-type.data.istex.fr/ark:/67375/XTP-6N5SZHKN-D">article</note><note type="publication-type" subtype="journal" scheme="https://publication-type.data.istex.fr/ark:/67375/JMC-0GLKJH51-B">journal</note></notesStmt><sourceDesc><biblStruct type="article"><analytic><title level="a" type="main">Dentist‐related factors influencing the amount of prosthodontic treatment provided</title><title level="a" type="short">Dentist‐related factors</title><author xml:id="author-0000"><persName><forename type="first">Mats</forename><surname>Kronström</surname></persName><affiliation>Department of Prosthetic Dentistry, Central Hospital, Skövde, Sweden<address><country key="SE"></country></address></affiliation><affiliation>Department of Prosthetic Dentistry, Lund University, Malmö, Sweden<address><country key="SE"></country></address></affiliation></author><author xml:id="author-0001"><persName><forename type="first">Sigvard</forename><surname>Palmqvist</surname></persName><affiliation>Department of Prosthetic Dentistry, Lund University, Malmö, Sweden<address><country key="SE"></country></address></affiliation><affiliation>Department of Prosthetic Dentistry, Copenhagen University, Copenhagen, Denmark<address><country key="DK"></country></address></affiliation></author><author xml:id="author-0002"><persName><forename type="first">Björn</forename><surname>Söderfeldt</surname></persName><affiliation>Department of Dental Public Health, Lund University, Malmö, Sweden<address><country key="SE"></country></address></affiliation></author><author xml:id="author-0003"><persName><forename type="first">Gunnar E.</forename><surname>Carlsson</surname></persName><affiliation>Department of Prosthetic Dentistry, Göteborg University, Gothenburg, Sweden<address><country key="SE"></country></address></affiliation></author><idno type="istex">D547097C1E7C028CFF3ACE123A902875C640DEF0</idno><idno type="ark">ark:/67375/WNG-G58QW5GJ-P</idno><idno type="DOI">10.1034/j.1600-0528.2000.280304.x</idno><idno type="unit">CDOE280304</idno><idno type="supplier">com9o053</idno><idno type="toTypesetVersion">file:CDOE.CDOE280304.pdf</idno></analytic><monogr><title level="j" type="main">Community Dentistry and Oral Epidemiology</title><title level="j" type="alt">COMMUNITY DENTISTRY ORAL EPIDEMIOLOGY</title><idno type="pISSN">0301-5661</idno><idno type="eISSN">1600-0528</idno><idno type="book-DOI">10.1111/(ISSN)1600-0528</idno><idno type="book-part-DOI">10.1111/com.2000.28.issue-3</idno><idno type="product">CDOE</idno><idno type="publisherDivision">ST</idno><imprint><biblScope unit="vol">28</biblScope><biblScope unit="issue">3</biblScope><biblScope unit="page" from="185">185</biblScope><biblScope unit="page" to="194">194</biblScope><biblScope unit="page-count">10</biblScope><publisher>Munksgaard International Publishers</publisher><pubPlace>Copenhagen</pubPlace><date type="published" when="2000-06"></date></imprint></monogr></biblStruct></sourceDesc></fileDesc><profileDesc><abstract xml:lang="en" style="main"><p><hi rend="bold">Abstract –</hi><hi rend="italic">Objectives:</hi><hi rend="italic">Methods:</hi><hi rend="italic">Results:</hi><hi rend="italic">Conclusion:</hi><:t>To evaluate, using multivariate methods, the associations between indicators of the amount of prosthodontic treatment and dentist‐related factors.</:t><:t>Questionnaires were sent to a random sample of 2059 general dentists, response rate was 76%. Two indicators of prosthodontic activity were used as dependent variables: 1) reported weekly working hours used for prosthodontics and 2) reported numbers of produced single crowns, fixed partial dentures, and removable dentures. Independent variables were ‘social and demographic attributes’, ‘job situation’ and ‘attitudes of dentists’. Multiple regression analysis was used in models with continuous dependent variables and logistic regression analysis for categorical dependent variables.</:t><:t>‘Weekly working hours used for dental care of adults’ showed a strong association in all models with the dependent variable ‘weekly working hours used for prosthodontics’. Male dentists provided more prosthodontic services than female dentists, even if reporting less time used for prosthodontics. Private practitioners produced more fixed prosthodontics than dentists employed in the public dental health service. Dentists in the public dental health service reported a higher production of removable dentures than private practitioners.</:t><:t>The results indicate that factors, besides those in the rational clinical model for decision‐making, e.g. gender and delivery system, play a role in the provision of prosthodontic services.</:t></p></abstract><textClass><keywords xml:lang="en"><term xml:id="k1">dental care</term><term xml:id="k2">prosthodontics</term><term xml:id="k3">regression analysis</term></keywords><keywords rend="tocHeading1"><term>Original Articles</term></keywords></textClass><langUsage><language ident="en"></language></langUsage></profileDesc><revisionDesc><change>undefined</change><change>[object Object]</change></revisionDesc></teiHeader></istex:fulltextTEI><json:item><extension>txt</extension><original>false</original><mimetype>text/plain</mimetype><uri>https://api.istex.fr/document/D547097C1E7C028CFF3ACE123A902875C640DEF0/fulltext/txt</uri></json:item></fulltext><metadata><istex:metadataXml wicri:clean="Wiley component found"><istex:xmlDeclaration>version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" standalone="yes"</istex:xmlDeclaration><istex:document><component version="2.0" type="serialArticle" xml:lang="en"><header><publicationMeta level="product"><publisherInfo><publisherName>Munksgaard International Publishers</publisherName><publisherLoc>Copenhagen</publisherLoc></publisherInfo><doi origin="wiley" registered="yes">10.1111/(ISSN)1600-0528</doi><issn type="print">0301-5661</issn><issn type="electronic">1600-0528</issn><idGroup><id type="product" value="CDOE"></id><id type="publisherDivision" value="ST"></id></idGroup><titleGroup><title type="main" sort="COMMUNITY DENTISTRY ORAL EPIDEMIOLOGY">Community Dentistry and Oral Epidemiology</title></titleGroup></publicationMeta><publicationMeta level="part" position="06003"><doi origin="wiley">10.1111/com.2000.28.issue-3</doi><numberingGroup><numbering type="journalVolume" number="28">28</numbering><numbering type="journalIssue" number="3">3</numbering></numberingGroup><coverDate startDate="2000-06">June 2000</coverDate></publicationMeta><publicationMeta level="unit" type="article" position="0018500" status="forIssue"><doi origin="wiley">10.1034/j.1600-0528.2000.280304.x</doi><idGroup><id type="unit" value="CDOE280304"></id><id type="supplier" value="com9o053"></id></idGroup><countGroup><count type="pageTotal" number="10"></count></countGroup><titleGroup><title type="tocHeading1">Original Articles</title></titleGroup><eventGroup><event type="firstOnline" date="2002-01-04"></event><event type="publishedOnlineFinalForm" date="2002-01-04"></event><event type="xmlConverted" agent="Converter:BPG_TO_WML3G version:2.3.2 mode:FullText source:Header result:Header" date="2010-03-04"></event><event type="xmlConverted" agent="Converter:WILEY_ML3G_TO_WILEY_ML3GV2 version:3.8.8" date="2014-01-08"></event><event type="xmlConverted" agent="Converter:WML3G_To_WML3G version:4.1.7 mode:FullText,remove_FC" date="2014-10-16"></event></eventGroup><numberingGroup><numbering type="pageFirst" number="185">185</numbering><numbering type="pageLast" number="194">194</numbering></numberingGroup><correspondenceTo>M. Kronström, Dept of Prosthetic Dentistry, Central Hospital, S‐541 85 Skövde, Sweden
Tel: +46 500 43 29 20
Fax: +46 500 43 29 30
e‐mail: <email>mats.kronstrom@ltskar.se</email></correspondenceTo><linkGroup><link type="toTypesetVersion" href="file:CDOE.CDOE280304.pdf"></link></linkGroup></publicationMeta><contentMeta><unparsedEditorialHistory>Submitted 3 December 1998; accepted 23 August 1999</unparsedEditorialHistory><countGroup><count type="figureTotal" number="0"></count><count type="tableTotal" number="0"></count><count type="formulaTotal" number="0"></count><count type="referenceTotal" number="0"></count><count type="wordTotal" number="6414"></count><count type="linksPubMed" number="0"></count><count type="linksCrossRef" number="0"></count></countGroup><titleGroup><title type="main">Dentist‐related factors influencing the amount of prosthodontic treatment provided</title><title type="shortAuthors">Kronström et al.</title><title type="short">Dentist‐related factors</title></titleGroup><creators><creator creatorRole="author" xml:id="cr1" affiliationRef="#a1 #a2"><personName><givenNames>Mats</givenNames><familyName>Kronström</familyName></personName></creator><creator creatorRole="author" xml:id="cr2" affiliationRef="#a2 #a3"><personName><givenNames>Sigvard</givenNames><familyName>Palmqvist</familyName></personName></creator><creator creatorRole="author" xml:id="cr3" affiliationRef="#a4"><personName><givenNames>Björn</givenNames><familyName>Söderfeldt</familyName></personName></creator><creator creatorRole="author" xml:id="cr4" affiliationRef="#a5"><personName><givenNames>Gunnar E.</givenNames><familyName>Carlsson</familyName></personName></creator></creators><affiliationGroup><affiliation xml:id="a1" countryCode="SE"><unparsedAffiliation>Department of Prosthetic Dentistry, Central Hospital, Skövde, Sweden</unparsedAffiliation></affiliation><affiliation xml:id="a2" countryCode="SE"><unparsedAffiliation>Department of Prosthetic Dentistry, Lund University, Malmö, Sweden</unparsedAffiliation></affiliation><affiliation xml:id="a3" countryCode="DK"><unparsedAffiliation>Department of Prosthetic Dentistry, Copenhagen University, Copenhagen, Denmark</unparsedAffiliation></affiliation><affiliation xml:id="a4" countryCode="SE"><unparsedAffiliation>Department of Dental Public Health, Lund University, Malmö, Sweden</unparsedAffiliation></affiliation><affiliation xml:id="a5" countryCode="SE"><unparsedAffiliation>Department of Prosthetic Dentistry, Göteborg University, Gothenburg, Sweden</unparsedAffiliation></affiliation></affiliationGroup><keywordGroup xml:lang="en"><keyword xml:id="k1">dental care</keyword><keyword xml:id="k2">prosthodontics</keyword><keyword xml:id="k3">regression analysis</keyword></keywordGroup><abstractGroup><abstract type="main" xml:lang="en"><p><b>Abstract –</b> <i>Objectives:</i> To evaluate, using multivariate methods, the associations between indicators of the amount of prosthodontic treatment and dentist‐related factors. <i>Methods:</i> Questionnaires were sent to a random sample of 2059 general dentists, response rate was 76%. Two indicators of prosthodontic activity were used as dependent variables: 1) reported weekly working hours used for prosthodontics and 2) reported numbers of produced single crowns, fixed partial dentures, and removable dentures. Independent variables were ‘social and demographic attributes’, ‘job situation’ and ‘attitudes of dentists’. Multiple regression analysis was used in models with continuous dependent variables and logistic regression analysis for categorical dependent variables. <i>Results:</i>‘Weekly working hours used for dental care of adults’ showed a strong association in all models with the dependent variable ‘weekly working hours used for prosthodontics’. Male dentists provided more prosthodontic services than female dentists, even if reporting less time used for prosthodontics. Private practitioners produced more fixed prosthodontics than dentists employed in the public dental health service. Dentists in the public dental health service reported a higher production of removable dentures than private practitioners. <i>Conclusion:</i> The results indicate that factors, besides those in the rational clinical model for decision‐making, e.g. gender and delivery system, play a role in the provision of prosthodontic services.</p></abstract></abstractGroup></contentMeta></header></component></istex:document></istex:metadataXml><mods version="3.6"><titleInfo lang="en"><title>Dentist‐related factors influencing the amount of prosthodontic treatment provided</title></titleInfo><titleInfo type="abbreviated" lang="en"><title>Dentist‐related factors</title></titleInfo><titleInfo type="alternative" contentType="CDATA" lang="en"><title>Dentist‐related factors influencing the amount of prosthodontic treatment provided</title></titleInfo><name type="personal"><namePart type="given">Mats</namePart><namePart type="family">Kronström</namePart><affiliation>Department of Prosthetic Dentistry, Central Hospital, Skövde, Sweden</affiliation><affiliation>Department of Prosthetic Dentistry, Lund University, Malmö, Sweden</affiliation><role><roleTerm type="text">author</roleTerm></role></name><name type="personal"><namePart type="given">Sigvard</namePart><namePart type="family">Palmqvist</namePart><affiliation>Department of Prosthetic Dentistry, Lund University, Malmö, Sweden</affiliation><affiliation>Department of Prosthetic Dentistry, Copenhagen University, Copenhagen, Denmark</affiliation><role><roleTerm type="text">author</roleTerm></role></name><name type="personal"><namePart type="given">Björn</namePart><namePart type="family">Söderfeldt</namePart><affiliation>Department of Dental Public Health, Lund University, Malmö, Sweden</affiliation><role><roleTerm type="text">author</roleTerm></role></name><name type="personal"><namePart type="given">Gunnar E.</namePart><namePart type="family">Carlsson</namePart><affiliation>Department of Prosthetic Dentistry, Göteborg University, Gothenburg, Sweden</affiliation><role><roleTerm type="text">author</roleTerm></role></name><typeOfResource>text</typeOfResource><genre type="article" displayLabel="article" authority="ISTEX" authorityURI="https://content-type.data.istex.fr" valueURI="https://content-type.data.istex.fr/ark:/67375/XTP-6N5SZHKN-D">article</genre><originInfo><publisher>Munksgaard International Publishers</publisher><place><placeTerm type="text">Copenhagen</placeTerm></place><dateIssued encoding="w3cdtf">2000-06</dateIssued><edition>Submitted 3 December 1998; accepted 23 August 1999</edition><copyrightDate encoding="w3cdtf">2000</copyrightDate></originInfo><language><languageTerm type="code" authority="rfc3066">en</languageTerm><languageTerm type="code" authority="iso639-2b">eng</languageTerm></language><physicalDescription><extent unit="figures">0</extent><extent unit="tables">0</extent><extent unit="formulas">0</extent><extent unit="references">0</extent><extent unit="linksCrossRef">0</extent><extent unit="words">6414</extent></physicalDescription><abstract>Abstract – Objectives: To evaluate, using multivariate methods, the associations between indicators of the amount of prosthodontic treatment and dentist‐related factors. Methods: Questionnaires were sent to a random sample of 2059 general dentists, response rate was 76%. Two indicators of prosthodontic activity were used as dependent variables: 1) reported weekly working hours used for prosthodontics and 2) reported numbers of produced single crowns, fixed partial dentures, and removable dentures. Independent variables were ‘social and demographic attributes’, ‘job situation’ and ‘attitudes of dentists’. Multiple regression analysis was used in models with continuous dependent variables and logistic regression analysis for categorical dependent variables. Results:‘Weekly working hours used for dental care of adults’ showed a strong association in all models with the dependent variable ‘weekly working hours used for prosthodontics’. Male dentists provided more prosthodontic services than female dentists, even if reporting less time used for prosthodontics. Private practitioners produced more fixed prosthodontics than dentists employed in the public dental health service. Dentists in the public dental health service reported a higher production of removable dentures than private practitioners. Conclusion: The results indicate that factors, besides those in the rational clinical model for decision‐making, e.g. gender and delivery system, play a role in the provision of prosthodontic services.</abstract><subject lang="en"><genre>keywords</genre><topic>dental care</topic><topic>prosthodontics</topic><topic>regression analysis</topic></subject><relatedItem type="host"><titleInfo><title>Community Dentistry and Oral Epidemiology</title></titleInfo><genre type="journal" authority="ISTEX" authorityURI="https://publication-type.data.istex.fr" valueURI="https://publication-type.data.istex.fr/ark:/67375/JMC-0GLKJH51-B">journal</genre><identifier type="ISSN">0301-5661</identifier><identifier type="eISSN">1600-0528</identifier><identifier type="DOI">10.1111/(ISSN)1600-0528</identifier><identifier type="PublisherID">CDOE</identifier><part><date>2000</date><detail type="volume"><caption>vol.</caption><number>28</number></detail><detail type="issue"><caption>no.</caption><number>3</number></detail><extent unit="pages"><start>185</start><end>194</end><total>10</total></extent></part></relatedItem><identifier type="istex">D547097C1E7C028CFF3ACE123A902875C640DEF0</identifier><identifier type="ark">ark:/67375/WNG-G58QW5GJ-P</identifier><identifier type="DOI">10.1034/j.1600-0528.2000.280304.x</identifier><identifier type="ArticleID">CDOE280304</identifier><recordInfo><recordContentSource authority="ISTEX" authorityURI="https://loaded-corpus.data.istex.fr" valueURI="https://loaded-corpus.data.istex.fr/ark:/67375/XBH-L0C46X92-X">wiley</recordContentSource><recordOrigin>Munksgaard International Publishers</recordOrigin></recordInfo></mods><json:item><extension>json</extension><original>false</original><mimetype>application/json</mimetype><uri>https://api.istex.fr/document/D547097C1E7C028CFF3ACE123A902875C640DEF0/metadata/json</uri></json:item></metadata><serie></serie></istex></record>Pour manipuler ce document sous Unix (Dilib)
EXPLOR_STEP=$WICRI_ROOT/Wicri/Santé/explor/EdenteV2/Data/Istex/Corpus
HfdSelect -h $EXPLOR_STEP/biblio.hfd -nk 006A03 | SxmlIndent | more
Ou
HfdSelect -h $EXPLOR_AREA/Data/Istex/Corpus/biblio.hfd -nk 006A03 | SxmlIndent | more
Pour mettre un lien sur cette page dans le réseau Wicri
{{Explor lien
|wiki= Wicri/Santé
|area= EdenteV2
|flux= Istex
|étape= Corpus
|type= RBID
|clé= ISTEX:D547097C1E7C028CFF3ACE123A902875C640DEF0
|texte= Dentist‐related factors influencing the amount of prosthodontic treatment provided
}}
| This area was generated with Dilib version V0.6.32. |  |