Clinical Experiences of CNC‐Milled Titanium Frameworks Supported by Implants in the Edentulous Jaw: 1‐Year Prospective Study
Identifieur interne : 006A01 ( Istex/Corpus ); précédent : 006A00; suivant : 006A02Clinical Experiences of CNC‐Milled Titanium Frameworks Supported by Implants in the Edentulous Jaw: 1‐Year Prospective Study
Auteurs : Anders Örtorp ; Torsten JemtSource :
- Clinical Implant Dentistry and Related Research [ 1523-0899 ] ; 2000-01.
English descriptors
- KwdEn :
- Bone quality, Bone resorption, Brinemark, Brinemark clinic, Clinical dentistry, Clinical experiences, Computer numeric, Control group, Control groups, Conventional cast frameworks, Dentistry, Edentulous, Edentulous mandible, Edentulous patients, First surgery, First year, Fracture, Framework, Gold alloy, Implant, Implant failure, Implant treatment, Insertion, Jemt, Lekholm, Lower jaws, Mandible, Marginal bone loss, Maxilla, Maxillofac, Nobel biocare, Oral maxillofac implants, Osseointegrated, Osseointegrated implants, Present study, Prosthesis, Prosthesis connection, Prosthesis insertion, Radiologic performances, Resin pattern, Resin teeth, Resin veneer fractures, Resorption, Similar pattern, Smoking habits, Test group, Titanium, Titanium framework, Titanium frameworks, Veneer, Welding joints.
- Teeft :
- Bone quality, Bone resorption, Brinemark, Brinemark clinic, Clinical dentistry, Clinical experiences, Computer numeric, Control group, Control groups, Conventional cast frameworks, Dentistry, Edentulous, Edentulous mandible, Edentulous patients, First surgery, First year, Fracture, Framework, Gold alloy, Implant, Implant failure, Implant treatment, Insertion, Jemt, Lekholm, Lower jaws, Mandible, Marginal bone loss, Maxilla, Maxillofac, Nobel biocare, Oral maxillofac implants, Osseointegrated, Osseointegrated implants, Present study, Prosthesis, Prosthesis connection, Prosthesis insertion, Radiologic performances, Resin pattern, Resin teeth, Resin veneer fractures, Resorption, Similar pattern, Smoking habits, Test group, Titanium, Titanium framework, Titanium frameworks, Veneer, Welding joints.
Abstract
Background: A new type of titanium framework has been introduced, but so far no clinical reports have been made in this treatment modality. Purpose: The aim of this study was to report the clinical performance of implant‐supported prostheses with computer numeric controlled (CNC)‐milled titanium frameworks in the edentulous jaw and to compare the results with prostheses provided with conventional cast frameworks during the first year of function. Material and Methods: A consecutive group of 65 patients with 67 prostheses were provided with CNC‐milled titanium frameworks in 23 upper and 44 lower jaws. During the same period, 61 consecutive patients were treated on a routine basis with 31 upper and 31 lower conventional gold alloy casting prostheses. Clinical and radiographic 1‐year data were collected for both the test and control groups. Results: A total of 14 of 729 inserted implants were lost during the follow‐up period (1.9%). All prostheses were functioning after 1 year except a conventional prosthesis with a cast framework, which was replaced by an implant‐supported over‐denture due to implant loss. The 1‐year cumulative survival rate (CSR) was 100% and 97.8% for CNC prostheses and implants, respectively. The corresponding CSR for the control group was 98.3% and 98.3%, respectively. Few problems were reported in both groups, and the clinical and the radiologic performances were similar for both groups. No mechanical complications except some resin veneer fractures (n = 6) were observed. The mean marginal bone loss for the test group during the first year in function was 0.4 mm (SD = 0.35) and 0.4 mm (SD = 0.33) in the upper and lower jaws, respectively. A similar pattern of bone reaction was also observed in the control group. Conclusion: CNC‐milled titanium frameworks can be used as an alternative to conventional castings in the edentulous jaw, presenting similar clinical and radiologic performances as conventional cast frameworks during the first year of function.
Url:
DOI: 10.1111/j.1708-8208.2000.tb00101.x
Links to Exploration step
ISTEX:D53E8D6F05D813EBD64D98D79F1F41CF56177C35Le document en format XML
<record><TEI wicri:istexFullTextTei="biblStruct"><teiHeader><fileDesc><titleStmt><title xml:lang="en">Clinical Experiences of CNC‐Milled Titanium Frameworks Supported by Implants in the Edentulous Jaw: 1‐Year Prospective Study</title><author><name sortKey="Ortorp, Anders" sort="Ortorp, Anders" uniqKey="Ortorp A" first="Anders" last="Örtorp">Anders Örtorp</name><affiliation><mods:affiliation>The Brånemark Clinic, Public Dental Health, Göteborg, Sweden</mods:affiliation></affiliation></author><author><name sortKey="Jemt, Torsten" sort="Jemt, Torsten" uniqKey="Jemt T" first="Torsten" last="Jemt">Torsten Jemt</name><affiliation><mods:affiliation>The Brånemark Clinic, Public Dental Health, Göteborg, Sweden</mods:affiliation></affiliation><affiliation><mods:affiliation>E-mail: torsten.jemt@odontologi.gu.se</mods:affiliation></affiliation></author></titleStmt><publicationStmt><idno type="wicri:source">ISTEX</idno><idno type="RBID">ISTEX:D53E8D6F05D813EBD64D98D79F1F41CF56177C35</idno><date when="2000" year="2000">2000</date><idno type="doi">10.1111/j.1708-8208.2000.tb00101.x</idno><idno type="url">https://api.istex.fr/document/D53E8D6F05D813EBD64D98D79F1F41CF56177C35/fulltext/pdf</idno><idno type="wicri:Area/Istex/Corpus">006A01</idno><idno type="wicri:explorRef" wicri:stream="Istex" wicri:step="Corpus" wicri:corpus="ISTEX">006A01</idno></publicationStmt><sourceDesc><biblStruct><analytic><title level="a" type="main">Clinical Experiences of CNC‐Milled Titanium Frameworks Supported by Implants in the Edentulous Jaw: 1‐Year Prospective Study</title><author><name sortKey="Ortorp, Anders" sort="Ortorp, Anders" uniqKey="Ortorp A" first="Anders" last="Örtorp">Anders Örtorp</name><affiliation><mods:affiliation>The Brånemark Clinic, Public Dental Health, Göteborg, Sweden</mods:affiliation></affiliation></author><author><name sortKey="Jemt, Torsten" sort="Jemt, Torsten" uniqKey="Jemt T" first="Torsten" last="Jemt">Torsten Jemt</name><affiliation><mods:affiliation>The Brånemark Clinic, Public Dental Health, Göteborg, Sweden</mods:affiliation></affiliation><affiliation><mods:affiliation>E-mail: torsten.jemt@odontologi.gu.se</mods:affiliation></affiliation></author></analytic><monogr></monogr><series><title level="j" type="main">Clinical Implant Dentistry and Related Research</title><title level="j" type="alt">CLINICAL IMPLANT DENTISTRY RELATED RESEARCH</title><idno type="ISSN">1523-0899</idno><idno type="eISSN">1708-8208</idno><imprint><biblScope unit="vol">2</biblScope><biblScope unit="issue">1</biblScope><biblScope unit="page" from="2">2</biblScope><biblScope unit="page" to="9">9</biblScope><biblScope unit="page-count">8</biblScope><publisher>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</publisher><pubPlace>Oxford, UK</pubPlace><date type="published" when="2000-01">2000-01</date></imprint><idno type="ISSN">1523-0899</idno></series></biblStruct></sourceDesc><seriesStmt><idno type="ISSN">1523-0899</idno></seriesStmt></fileDesc><profileDesc><textClass><keywords scheme="KwdEn" xml:lang="en"><term>Bone quality</term><term>Bone resorption</term><term>Brinemark</term><term>Brinemark clinic</term><term>Clinical dentistry</term><term>Clinical experiences</term><term>Computer numeric</term><term>Control group</term><term>Control groups</term><term>Conventional cast frameworks</term><term>Dentistry</term><term>Edentulous</term><term>Edentulous mandible</term><term>Edentulous patients</term><term>First surgery</term><term>First year</term><term>Fracture</term><term>Framework</term><term>Gold alloy</term><term>Implant</term><term>Implant failure</term><term>Implant treatment</term><term>Insertion</term><term>Jemt</term><term>Lekholm</term><term>Lower jaws</term><term>Mandible</term><term>Marginal bone loss</term><term>Maxilla</term><term>Maxillofac</term><term>Nobel biocare</term><term>Oral maxillofac implants</term><term>Osseointegrated</term><term>Osseointegrated implants</term><term>Present study</term><term>Prosthesis</term><term>Prosthesis connection</term><term>Prosthesis insertion</term><term>Radiologic performances</term><term>Resin pattern</term><term>Resin teeth</term><term>Resin veneer fractures</term><term>Resorption</term><term>Similar pattern</term><term>Smoking habits</term><term>Test group</term><term>Titanium</term><term>Titanium framework</term><term>Titanium frameworks</term><term>Veneer</term><term>Welding joints</term></keywords><keywords scheme="Teeft" xml:lang="en"><term>Bone quality</term><term>Bone resorption</term><term>Brinemark</term><term>Brinemark clinic</term><term>Clinical dentistry</term><term>Clinical experiences</term><term>Computer numeric</term><term>Control group</term><term>Control groups</term><term>Conventional cast frameworks</term><term>Dentistry</term><term>Edentulous</term><term>Edentulous mandible</term><term>Edentulous patients</term><term>First surgery</term><term>First year</term><term>Fracture</term><term>Framework</term><term>Gold alloy</term><term>Implant</term><term>Implant failure</term><term>Implant treatment</term><term>Insertion</term><term>Jemt</term><term>Lekholm</term><term>Lower jaws</term><term>Mandible</term><term>Marginal bone loss</term><term>Maxilla</term><term>Maxillofac</term><term>Nobel biocare</term><term>Oral maxillofac implants</term><term>Osseointegrated</term><term>Osseointegrated implants</term><term>Present study</term><term>Prosthesis</term><term>Prosthesis connection</term><term>Prosthesis insertion</term><term>Radiologic performances</term><term>Resin pattern</term><term>Resin teeth</term><term>Resin veneer fractures</term><term>Resorption</term><term>Similar pattern</term><term>Smoking habits</term><term>Test group</term><term>Titanium</term><term>Titanium framework</term><term>Titanium frameworks</term><term>Veneer</term><term>Welding joints</term></keywords></textClass></profileDesc></teiHeader><front><div type="abstract" xml:lang="en">Background: A new type of titanium framework has been introduced, but so far no clinical reports have been made in this treatment modality. Purpose: The aim of this study was to report the clinical performance of implant‐supported prostheses with computer numeric controlled (CNC)‐milled titanium frameworks in the edentulous jaw and to compare the results with prostheses provided with conventional cast frameworks during the first year of function. Material and Methods: A consecutive group of 65 patients with 67 prostheses were provided with CNC‐milled titanium frameworks in 23 upper and 44 lower jaws. During the same period, 61 consecutive patients were treated on a routine basis with 31 upper and 31 lower conventional gold alloy casting prostheses. Clinical and radiographic 1‐year data were collected for both the test and control groups. Results: A total of 14 of 729 inserted implants were lost during the follow‐up period (1.9%). All prostheses were functioning after 1 year except a conventional prosthesis with a cast framework, which was replaced by an implant‐supported over‐denture due to implant loss. The 1‐year cumulative survival rate (CSR) was 100% and 97.8% for CNC prostheses and implants, respectively. The corresponding CSR for the control group was 98.3% and 98.3%, respectively. Few problems were reported in both groups, and the clinical and the radiologic performances were similar for both groups. No mechanical complications except some resin veneer fractures (n = 6) were observed. The mean marginal bone loss for the test group during the first year in function was 0.4 mm (SD = 0.35) and 0.4 mm (SD = 0.33) in the upper and lower jaws, respectively. A similar pattern of bone reaction was also observed in the control group. Conclusion: CNC‐milled titanium frameworks can be used as an alternative to conventional castings in the edentulous jaw, presenting similar clinical and radiologic performances as conventional cast frameworks during the first year of function.</div></front></TEI><istex><corpusName>wiley</corpusName><keywords><teeft><json:string>prosthesis</json:string><json:string>implant</json:string><json:string>maxilla</json:string><json:string>mandible</json:string><json:string>titanium frameworks</json:string><json:string>control group</json:string><json:string>jemt</json:string><json:string>edentulous</json:string><json:string>titanium</json:string><json:string>first year</json:string><json:string>test group</json:string><json:string>lekholm</json:string><json:string>fracture</json:string><json:string>lower jaws</json:string><json:string>maxillofac</json:string><json:string>brinemark</json:string><json:string>titanium framework</json:string><json:string>osseointegrated</json:string><json:string>resorption</json:string><json:string>oral maxillofac implants</json:string><json:string>osseointegrated implants</json:string><json:string>conventional cast frameworks</json:string><json:string>edentulous patients</json:string><json:string>bone quality</json:string><json:string>prosthesis insertion</json:string><json:string>first surgery</json:string><json:string>control groups</json:string><json:string>smoking habits</json:string><json:string>insertion</json:string><json:string>resin teeth</json:string><json:string>edentulous mandible</json:string><json:string>radiologic performances</json:string><json:string>clinical experiences</json:string><json:string>implant treatment</json:string><json:string>dentistry</json:string><json:string>veneer</json:string><json:string>resin pattern</json:string><json:string>marginal bone loss</json:string><json:string>nobel biocare</json:string><json:string>resin veneer fractures</json:string><json:string>welding joints</json:string><json:string>similar pattern</json:string><json:string>brinemark clinic</json:string><json:string>bone resorption</json:string><json:string>gold alloy</json:string><json:string>prosthesis connection</json:string><json:string>implant failure</json:string><json:string>present study</json:string><json:string>computer numeric</json:string><json:string>clinical dentistry</json:string><json:string>framework</json:string></teeft></keywords><author><json:item><name>Anders Örtorp LDS</name><affiliations><json:string>The Brånemark Clinic, Public Dental Health, Göteborg, Sweden</json:string></affiliations></json:item><json:item><name>Torsten Jemt LDS, Odont Dr</name><affiliations><json:string>The Brånemark Clinic, Public Dental Health, Göteborg, Sweden</json:string><json:string>E-mail: torsten.jemt@odontologi.gu.se</json:string></affiliations></json:item></author><subject><json:item><lang><json:string>eng</json:string></lang><value>computer numeric controlled</value></json:item><json:item><lang><json:string>eng</json:string></lang><value>implant‐supported</value></json:item><json:item><lang><json:string>eng</json:string></lang><value>prostheses</value></json:item><json:item><lang><json:string>eng</json:string></lang><value>titanium</value></json:item></subject><articleId><json:string>CID2</json:string></articleId><arkIstex>ark:/67375/WNG-TT0TC8FN-1</arkIstex><language><json:string>eng</json:string></language><originalGenre><json:string>article</json:string></originalGenre><abstract>Background: A new type of titanium framework has been introduced, but so far no clinical reports have been made in this treatment modality. Purpose: The aim of this study was to report the clinical performance of implant‐supported prostheses with computer numeric controlled (CNC)‐milled titanium frameworks in the edentulous jaw and to compare the results with prostheses provided with conventional cast frameworks during the first year of function. Material and Methods: A consecutive group of 65 patients with 67 prostheses were provided with CNC‐milled titanium frameworks in 23 upper and 44 lower jaws. During the same period, 61 consecutive patients were treated on a routine basis with 31 upper and 31 lower conventional gold alloy casting prostheses. Clinical and radiographic 1‐year data were collected for both the test and control groups. Results: A total of 14 of 729 inserted implants were lost during the follow‐up period (1.9%). All prostheses were functioning after 1 year except a conventional prosthesis with a cast framework, which was replaced by an implant‐supported over‐denture due to implant loss. The 1‐year cumulative survival rate (CSR) was 100% and 97.8% for CNC prostheses and implants, respectively. The corresponding CSR for the control group was 98.3% and 98.3%, respectively. Few problems were reported in both groups, and the clinical and the radiologic performances were similar for both groups. No mechanical complications except some resin veneer fractures (n = 6) were observed. The mean marginal bone loss for the test group during the first year in function was 0.4 mm (SD = 0.35) and 0.4 mm (SD = 0.33) in the upper and lower jaws, respectively. A similar pattern of bone reaction was also observed in the control group. Conclusion: CNC‐milled titanium frameworks can be used as an alternative to conventional castings in the edentulous jaw, presenting similar clinical and radiologic performances as conventional cast frameworks during the first year of function.</abstract><qualityIndicators><score>9.076</score><pdfWordCount>4076</pdfWordCount><pdfCharCount>25138</pdfCharCount><pdfVersion>1.4</pdfVersion><pdfPageCount>8</pdfPageCount><pdfPageSize>576 x 792 pts</pdfPageSize><refBibsNative>true</refBibsNative><abstractWordCount>312</abstractWordCount><abstractCharCount>2005</abstractCharCount><keywordCount>4</keywordCount></qualityIndicators><title>Clinical Experiences of CNC‐Milled Titanium Frameworks Supported by Implants in the Edentulous Jaw: 1‐Year Prospective Study</title><pmid><json:string>11359272</json:string></pmid><genre><json:string>article</json:string></genre><host><title>Clinical Implant Dentistry and Related Research</title><language><json:string>unknown</json:string></language><doi><json:string>10.1111/(ISSN)1708-8208</json:string></doi><issn><json:string>1523-0899</json:string></issn><eissn><json:string>1708-8208</json:string></eissn><publisherId><json:string>CID</json:string></publisherId><volume>2</volume><issue>1</issue><pages><first>2</first><last>9</last><total>8</total></pages><genre><json:string>journal</json:string></genre></host><namedEntities><unitex><date><json:string>2000</json:string><json:string>1986</json:string><json:string>from November 1996 to February 1998</json:string></date><geogName></geogName><orgName><json:string>Related Research, Volume</json:string><json:string>Decker Inc.</json:string></orgName><orgName_funder></orgName_funder><orgName_provider></orgName_provider><persName><json:string>Characteristics</json:string><json:string>Withdrawn</json:string><json:string>Treated</json:string><json:string>Lost</json:string><json:string>Maxilla</json:string></persName><placeName><json:string>Sweden</json:string></placeName><ref_url></ref_url><ref_bibl><json:string>Jemt et aL</json:string></ref_bibl><bibl></bibl></unitex></namedEntities><ark><json:string>ark:/67375/WNG-TT0TC8FN-1</json:string></ark><categories><wos><json:string>1 - science</json:string><json:string>2 - dentistry, oral surgery & medicine</json:string></wos><scienceMetrix><json:string>1 - health sciences</json:string><json:string>2 - clinical medicine</json:string><json:string>3 - dentistry</json:string></scienceMetrix><scopus><json:string>1 - Health Sciences</json:string><json:string>2 - Dentistry</json:string><json:string>3 - General Dentistry</json:string><json:string>1 - Health Sciences</json:string><json:string>2 - Dentistry</json:string><json:string>3 - Oral Surgery</json:string></scopus><inist><json:string>1 - sciences appliquees, technologies et medecines</json:string><json:string>2 - sciences biologiques et medicales</json:string><json:string>3 - sciences medicales</json:string></inist></categories><publicationDate>2000</publicationDate><copyrightDate>2000</copyrightDate><doi><json:string>10.1111/j.1708-8208.2000.tb00101.x</json:string></doi><id>D53E8D6F05D813EBD64D98D79F1F41CF56177C35</id><score>1</score><fulltext><json:item><extension>pdf</extension><original>true</original><mimetype>application/pdf</mimetype><uri>https://api.istex.fr/document/D53E8D6F05D813EBD64D98D79F1F41CF56177C35/fulltext/pdf</uri></json:item><json:item><extension>zip</extension><original>false</original><mimetype>application/zip</mimetype><uri>https://api.istex.fr/document/D53E8D6F05D813EBD64D98D79F1F41CF56177C35/fulltext/zip</uri></json:item><istex:fulltextTEI uri="https://api.istex.fr/document/D53E8D6F05D813EBD64D98D79F1F41CF56177C35/fulltext/tei"><teiHeader><fileDesc><titleStmt><title level="a" type="main">Clinical Experiences of CNC‐Milled Titanium Frameworks Supported by Implants in the Edentulous Jaw: 1‐Year Prospective Study</title></titleStmt><publicationStmt><authority>ISTEX</authority><publisher>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</publisher><pubPlace>Oxford, UK</pubPlace><date type="published" when="2000-01"></date></publicationStmt><notesStmt><note type="content-type" subtype="article" source="article" scheme="https://content-type.data.istex.fr/ark:/67375/XTP-6N5SZHKN-D">article</note><note type="publication-type" subtype="journal" scheme="https://publication-type.data.istex.fr/ark:/67375/JMC-0GLKJH51-B">journal</note></notesStmt><sourceDesc><biblStruct type="article"><analytic><title level="a" type="main">Clinical Experiences of CNC‐Milled Titanium Frameworks Supported by Implants in the Edentulous Jaw: 1‐Year Prospective Study</title><author xml:id="author-0000"><persName><forename type="first">Anders</forename><surname>Örtorp</surname><roleName type="degree">LDS</roleName></persName><affiliation>The Brånemark Clinic, Public Dental Health, Göteborg, Sweden<address><country key="SE"></country></address></affiliation></author><author xml:id="author-0001" role="corresp"><persName><forename type="first">Torsten</forename><surname>Jemt</surname><roleName type="degree">LDS, Odont Dr</roleName></persName><affiliation>The Brånemark Clinic, Public Dental Health, Göteborg, Sweden<address><country key="SE"></country></address></affiliation><affiliation>Reprint requests: Torsten Jemt, LDS, Odont Dr, The Brånemark Clinic, Public Dental Health, Medicinaregatan 12 C, S‐413 90 Göteborg, Sweden. E‐mail: torsten.jemt@odontologi.gu.se</affiliation></author><idno type="istex">D53E8D6F05D813EBD64D98D79F1F41CF56177C35</idno><idno type="ark">ark:/67375/WNG-TT0TC8FN-1</idno><idno type="DOI">10.1111/j.1708-8208.2000.tb00101.x</idno><idno type="unit">CID2</idno><idno type="toTypesetVersion">file:CID.CID2.pdf</idno></analytic><monogr><title level="j" type="main">Clinical Implant Dentistry and Related Research</title><title level="j" type="alt">CLINICAL IMPLANT DENTISTRY RELATED RESEARCH</title><idno type="pISSN">1523-0899</idno><idno type="eISSN">1708-8208</idno><idno type="book-DOI">10.1111/(ISSN)1708-8208</idno><idno type="book-part-DOI">10.1111/cid.2000.2.issue-1</idno><idno type="product">CID</idno><idno type="publisherDivision">ST</idno><imprint><biblScope unit="vol">2</biblScope><biblScope unit="issue">1</biblScope><biblScope unit="page" from="2">2</biblScope><biblScope unit="page" to="9">9</biblScope><biblScope unit="page-count">8</biblScope><publisher>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</publisher><pubPlace>Oxford, UK</pubPlace><date type="published" when="2000-01"></date></imprint></monogr></biblStruct></sourceDesc></fileDesc><profileDesc><abstract xml:lang="en" style="main"><head>ABSTRACT</head><p>
<hi rend="italic">Background</hi>: A new type of titanium framework has been introduced, but so far no clinical reports have been made in this treatment modality.</p><p>
<hi rend="italic">Purpose</hi>: The aim of this study was to report the clinical performance of implant‐supported prostheses with computer numeric controlled (CNC)‐milled titanium frameworks in the edentulous jaw and to compare the results with prostheses provided with conventional cast frameworks during the first year of function.</p><p>
<hi rend="italic">Material and Methods</hi>: A consecutive group of 65 patients with 67 prostheses were provided with CNC‐milled titanium frameworks in 23 upper and 44 lower jaws. During the same period, 61 consecutive patients were treated on a routine basis with 31 upper and 31 lower conventional gold alloy casting prostheses. Clinical and radiographic 1‐year data were collected for both the test and control groups.</p><p>
<hi rend="italic">Results</hi>: A total of 14 of 729 inserted implants were lost during the follow‐up period (1.9%). All prostheses were functioning after 1 year except a conventional prosthesis with a cast framework, which was replaced by an implant‐supported over‐denture due to implant loss. The 1‐year cumulative survival rate (CSR) was 100% and 97.8% for CNC prostheses and implants, respectively. The corresponding CSR for the control group was 98.3% and 98.3%, respectively. Few problems were reported in both groups, and the clinical and the radiologic performances were similar for both groups. No mechanical complications except some resin veneer fractures (n = 6) were observed. The mean marginal bone loss for the test group during the first year in function was 0.4 mm (SD = 0.35) and 0.4 mm (SD = 0.33) in the upper and lower jaws, respectively. A similar pattern of bone reaction was also observed in the control group.</p><p>
<hi rend="italic">Conclusion</hi>: CNC‐milled titanium frameworks can be used as an alternative to conventional castings in the edentulous jaw, presenting similar clinical and radiologic performances as conventional cast frameworks during the first year of function.</p></abstract><textClass><keywords xml:lang="en"><term xml:id="k1">computer numeric controlled</term><term xml:id="k2">implant‐supported</term><term xml:id="k3">prostheses</term><term xml:id="k4">titanium</term></keywords></textClass><langUsage><language ident="en"></language></langUsage></profileDesc></teiHeader></istex:fulltextTEI><json:item><extension>txt</extension><original>false</original><mimetype>text/plain</mimetype><uri>https://api.istex.fr/document/D53E8D6F05D813EBD64D98D79F1F41CF56177C35/fulltext/txt</uri></json:item></fulltext><metadata><istex:metadataXml wicri:clean="Wiley, elements deleted: body"><istex:xmlDeclaration>version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" standalone="yes"</istex:xmlDeclaration><istex:document><component version="2.0" type="serialArticle" xml:lang="en"><header><publicationMeta level="product"><publisherInfo><publisherName>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</publisherName><publisherLoc>Oxford, UK</publisherLoc></publisherInfo><doi origin="wiley" registered="yes">10.1111/(ISSN)1708-8208</doi><issn type="print">1523-0899</issn><issn type="electronic">1708-8208</issn><idGroup><id type="product" value="CID"></id><id type="publisherDivision" value="ST"></id></idGroup><titleGroup><title type="main" sort="CLINICAL IMPLANT DENTISTRY RELATED RESEARCH">Clinical Implant Dentistry and Related Research</title></titleGroup></publicationMeta><publicationMeta level="part" position="01001"><doi origin="wiley">10.1111/cid.2000.2.issue-1</doi><numberingGroup><numbering type="journalVolume" number="2">2</numbering><numbering type="journalIssue" number="1">1</numbering></numberingGroup><coverDate startDate="2000-01">January 2000</coverDate></publicationMeta><publicationMeta level="unit" type="article" position="0000200" status="forIssue"><doi origin="wiley">10.1111/j.1708-8208.2000.tb00101.x</doi><idGroup><id type="unit" value="CID2"></id></idGroup><countGroup><count type="pageTotal" number="8"></count></countGroup><eventGroup><event type="firstOnline" date="2007-04-10"></event><event type="publishedOnlineFinalForm" date="2007-04-10"></event><event type="xmlConverted" agent="Converter:BPG_TO_WML3G version:2.3.2 mode:FullText source:HeaderRef result:HeaderRef" date="2010-03-13"></event><event type="xmlConverted" agent="Converter:WILEY_ML3G_TO_WILEY_ML3GV2 version:3.8.8" date="2014-01-15"></event><event type="xmlConverted" agent="Converter:WML3G_To_WML3G version:4.1.7 mode:FullText,remove_FC" date="2014-10-17"></event></eventGroup><numberingGroup><numbering type="pageFirst" number="2">2</numbering><numbering type="pageLast" number="9">9</numbering></numberingGroup><correspondenceTo>Reprint requests: Torsten Jemt, LDS, Odont Dr, The Brånemark Clinic, Public Dental Health, Medicinaregatan 12 C, S‐413 90 Göteborg, Sweden. E‐mail: <email>torsten.jemt@odontologi.gu.se</email></correspondenceTo><linkGroup><link type="toTypesetVersion" href="file:CID.CID2.pdf"></link></linkGroup></publicationMeta><contentMeta><countGroup><count type="referenceTotal" number="27"></count><count type="linksCrossRef" number="3"></count></countGroup><titleGroup><title type="main">Clinical Experiences of CNC‐Milled Titanium Frameworks Supported by Implants in the Edentulous Jaw: 1‐Year Prospective Study</title></titleGroup><creators><creator creatorRole="author" xml:id="cr1" affiliationRef="#a1"><personName><givenNames>Anders</givenNames><familyName>Örtorp</familyName><degrees>LDS</degrees></personName></creator><creator creatorRole="author" xml:id="cr2" affiliationRef="#a1" corresponding="yes"><personName><givenNames>Torsten</givenNames><familyName>Jemt</familyName><degrees>LDS, Odont Dr</degrees></personName></creator></creators><affiliationGroup><affiliation xml:id="a1" countryCode="SE"><unparsedAffiliation>The Brånemark Clinic, Public Dental Health, Göteborg, Sweden</unparsedAffiliation></affiliation></affiliationGroup><keywordGroup xml:lang="en"><keyword xml:id="k1">computer numeric controlled</keyword><keyword xml:id="k2">implant‐supported</keyword><keyword xml:id="k3">prostheses</keyword><keyword xml:id="k4">titanium</keyword></keywordGroup><abstractGroup><abstract type="main" xml:lang="en"><title type="main">ABSTRACT</title><p> <i>Background</i>: A new type of titanium framework has been introduced, but so far no clinical reports have been made in this treatment modality.</p><p> <i>Purpose</i>: The aim of this study was to report the clinical performance of implant‐supported prostheses with computer numeric controlled (CNC)‐milled titanium frameworks in the edentulous jaw and to compare the results with prostheses provided with conventional cast frameworks during the first year of function.</p><p> <i>Material and Methods</i>: A consecutive group of 65 patients with 67 prostheses were provided with CNC‐milled titanium frameworks in 23 upper and 44 lower jaws. During the same period, 61 consecutive patients were treated on a routine basis with 31 upper and 31 lower conventional gold alloy casting prostheses. Clinical and radiographic 1‐year data were collected for both the test and control groups.</p><p> <i>Results</i>: A total of 14 of 729 inserted implants were lost during the follow‐up period (1.9%). All prostheses were functioning after 1 year except a conventional prosthesis with a cast framework, which was replaced by an implant‐supported over‐denture due to implant loss. The 1‐year cumulative survival rate (CSR) was 100% and 97.8% for CNC prostheses and implants, respectively. The corresponding CSR for the control group was 98.3% and 98.3%, respectively. Few problems were reported in both groups, and the clinical and the radiologic performances were similar for both groups. No mechanical complications except some resin veneer fractures (n = 6) were observed. The mean marginal bone loss for the test group during the first year in function was 0.4 mm (SD = 0.35) and 0.4 mm (SD = 0.33) in the upper and lower jaws, respectively. A similar pattern of bone reaction was also observed in the control group.</p><p> <i>Conclusion</i>: CNC‐milled titanium frameworks can be used as an alternative to conventional castings in the edentulous jaw, presenting similar clinical and radiologic performances as conventional cast frameworks during the first year of function.</p></abstract></abstractGroup></contentMeta></header></component></istex:document></istex:metadataXml><mods version="3.6"><titleInfo lang="en"><title>Clinical Experiences of CNC‐Milled Titanium Frameworks Supported by Implants in the Edentulous Jaw: 1‐Year Prospective Study</title></titleInfo><titleInfo type="alternative" contentType="CDATA" lang="en"><title>Clinical Experiences of CNC‐Milled Titanium Frameworks Supported by Implants in the Edentulous Jaw: 1‐Year Prospective Study</title></titleInfo><name type="personal"><namePart type="given">Anders</namePart><namePart type="family">Örtorp</namePart><namePart type="termsOfAddress">LDS</namePart><affiliation>The Brånemark Clinic, Public Dental Health, Göteborg, Sweden</affiliation><role><roleTerm type="text">author</roleTerm></role></name><name type="personal"><namePart type="given">Torsten</namePart><namePart type="family">Jemt</namePart><namePart type="termsOfAddress">LDS, Odont Dr</namePart><affiliation>The Brånemark Clinic, Public Dental Health, Göteborg, Sweden</affiliation><affiliation>E-mail: torsten.jemt@odontologi.gu.se</affiliation><role><roleTerm type="text">author</roleTerm></role></name><typeOfResource>text</typeOfResource><genre type="article" displayLabel="article" authority="ISTEX" authorityURI="https://content-type.data.istex.fr" valueURI="https://content-type.data.istex.fr/ark:/67375/XTP-6N5SZHKN-D">article</genre><originInfo><publisher>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</publisher><place><placeTerm type="text">Oxford, UK</placeTerm></place><dateIssued encoding="w3cdtf">2000-01</dateIssued><copyrightDate encoding="w3cdtf">2000</copyrightDate></originInfo><language><languageTerm type="code" authority="rfc3066">en</languageTerm><languageTerm type="code" authority="iso639-2b">eng</languageTerm></language><physicalDescription><extent unit="references">27</extent><extent unit="linksCrossRef">3</extent></physicalDescription><abstract lang="en">Background: A new type of titanium framework has been introduced, but so far no clinical reports have been made in this treatment modality. Purpose: The aim of this study was to report the clinical performance of implant‐supported prostheses with computer numeric controlled (CNC)‐milled titanium frameworks in the edentulous jaw and to compare the results with prostheses provided with conventional cast frameworks during the first year of function. Material and Methods: A consecutive group of 65 patients with 67 prostheses were provided with CNC‐milled titanium frameworks in 23 upper and 44 lower jaws. During the same period, 61 consecutive patients were treated on a routine basis with 31 upper and 31 lower conventional gold alloy casting prostheses. Clinical and radiographic 1‐year data were collected for both the test and control groups. Results: A total of 14 of 729 inserted implants were lost during the follow‐up period (1.9%). All prostheses were functioning after 1 year except a conventional prosthesis with a cast framework, which was replaced by an implant‐supported over‐denture due to implant loss. The 1‐year cumulative survival rate (CSR) was 100% and 97.8% for CNC prostheses and implants, respectively. The corresponding CSR for the control group was 98.3% and 98.3%, respectively. Few problems were reported in both groups, and the clinical and the radiologic performances were similar for both groups. No mechanical complications except some resin veneer fractures (n = 6) were observed. The mean marginal bone loss for the test group during the first year in function was 0.4 mm (SD = 0.35) and 0.4 mm (SD = 0.33) in the upper and lower jaws, respectively. A similar pattern of bone reaction was also observed in the control group. Conclusion: CNC‐milled titanium frameworks can be used as an alternative to conventional castings in the edentulous jaw, presenting similar clinical and radiologic performances as conventional cast frameworks during the first year of function.</abstract><subject lang="en"><genre>keywords</genre><topic>computer numeric controlled</topic><topic>implant‐supported</topic><topic>prostheses</topic><topic>titanium</topic></subject><relatedItem type="host"><titleInfo><title>Clinical Implant Dentistry and Related Research</title></titleInfo><genre type="journal" authority="ISTEX" authorityURI="https://publication-type.data.istex.fr" valueURI="https://publication-type.data.istex.fr/ark:/67375/JMC-0GLKJH51-B">journal</genre><identifier type="ISSN">1523-0899</identifier><identifier type="eISSN">1708-8208</identifier><identifier type="DOI">10.1111/(ISSN)1708-8208</identifier><identifier type="PublisherID">CID</identifier><part><date>2000</date><detail type="volume"><caption>vol.</caption><number>2</number></detail><detail type="issue"><caption>no.</caption><number>1</number></detail><extent unit="pages"><start>2</start><end>9</end><total>8</total></extent></part></relatedItem><identifier type="istex">D53E8D6F05D813EBD64D98D79F1F41CF56177C35</identifier><identifier type="ark">ark:/67375/WNG-TT0TC8FN-1</identifier><identifier type="DOI">10.1111/j.1708-8208.2000.tb00101.x</identifier><identifier type="ArticleID">CID2</identifier><recordInfo><recordContentSource authority="ISTEX" authorityURI="https://loaded-corpus.data.istex.fr" valueURI="https://loaded-corpus.data.istex.fr/ark:/67375/XBH-L0C46X92-X">wiley</recordContentSource><recordOrigin>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</recordOrigin></recordInfo></mods><json:item><extension>json</extension><original>false</original><mimetype>application/json</mimetype><uri>https://api.istex.fr/document/D53E8D6F05D813EBD64D98D79F1F41CF56177C35/metadata/json</uri></json:item></metadata><serie></serie></istex></record>Pour manipuler ce document sous Unix (Dilib)
EXPLOR_STEP=$WICRI_ROOT/Wicri/Santé/explor/EdenteV2/Data/Istex/Corpus
HfdSelect -h $EXPLOR_STEP/biblio.hfd -nk 006A01 | SxmlIndent | more
Ou
HfdSelect -h $EXPLOR_AREA/Data/Istex/Corpus/biblio.hfd -nk 006A01 | SxmlIndent | more
Pour mettre un lien sur cette page dans le réseau Wicri
{{Explor lien
|wiki= Wicri/Santé
|area= EdenteV2
|flux= Istex
|étape= Corpus
|type= RBID
|clé= ISTEX:D53E8D6F05D813EBD64D98D79F1F41CF56177C35
|texte= Clinical Experiences of CNC‐Milled Titanium Frameworks Supported by Implants in the Edentulous Jaw: 1‐Year Prospective Study
}}
| This area was generated with Dilib version V0.6.32. |  |