Maxillary sinus floor elevation using the (transalveolar) osteotome technique with or without grafting material. Part I: implant survival and patients' perception
Identifieur interne : 006940 ( Istex/Corpus ); précédent : 006939; suivant : 006941Maxillary sinus floor elevation using the (transalveolar) osteotome technique with or without grafting material. Part I: implant survival and patients' perception
Auteurs : Bjarni E. Pjetursson ; Claude Rast ; Urs Br Gger ; Kurt Schmidlin ; Marcel Zwahlen ; Niklaus P. LangSource :
- Clinical Oral Implants Research [ 0905-7161 ] ; 2009-07.
English descriptors
- KwdEn :
- Alveolar crest, Attachment levels, Biological complications, Bone height, Clin, Clinical examination, Compact bone, Control implants, Cumulative survival rate, Dental implants, Dental prosthesis, Diameter implant, Edentulous, Edentulous space, Elevation, Frequency analysis, Functional loading, Gger, Impl, Implant, Implant insertion, Implant length, Implant placement, Implant position, Implant shoulder, Implant site, Implant sites, Implant survival, Implant therapy, Implants implants, Implants research, Insertion, International journal, John wiley sons, Lang, Marginal bone level, Marginal bone levels, Maxilla, Maxillary, Maxillary sinus, Membrane perforation, Oblique sinus, Observation period, Oral impl, Osteotome, Osteotome implants, Osteotome sinus, Osteotome technique, Osteotomeinstalled implants, Osteotomes, Partial dentures, Perforation, Pjetursson, Pocket depth, Posterior maxilla, Present study, Residual, Residual bone height, Schneiderian membrane, Sinus, Sinus cavity, Sinus membrane, Soft tissue parameters, Standard implant placement, Standard implants, Straight osteotome, Success rates, Summers technique, Surgical, Surgical procedure, Survival rate, Survival rates, Systematic review, Systematic reviews, Tapered osteotome, Test implants, Transalveolar, Transalveolar approach, Valsalva manoeuvre, Visual analogue scale.
- Teeft :
- Alveolar crest, Attachment levels, Biological complications, Bone height, Clin, Clinical examination, Compact bone, Control implants, Cumulative survival rate, Dental implants, Dental prosthesis, Diameter implant, Edentulous, Edentulous space, Elevation, Frequency analysis, Functional loading, Gger, Impl, Implant, Implant insertion, Implant length, Implant placement, Implant position, Implant shoulder, Implant site, Implant sites, Implant survival, Implant therapy, Implants implants, Implants research, Insertion, International journal, John wiley sons, Lang, Marginal bone level, Marginal bone levels, Maxilla, Maxillary, Maxillary sinus, Membrane perforation, Oblique sinus, Observation period, Oral impl, Osteotome, Osteotome implants, Osteotome sinus, Osteotome technique, Osteotomeinstalled implants, Osteotomes, Partial dentures, Perforation, Pjetursson, Pocket depth, Posterior maxilla, Present study, Residual, Residual bone height, Schneiderian membrane, Sinus, Sinus cavity, Sinus membrane, Soft tissue parameters, Standard implant placement, Standard implants, Straight osteotome, Success rates, Summers technique, Surgical, Surgical procedure, Survival rate, Survival rates, Systematic review, Systematic reviews, Tapered osteotome, Test implants, Transalveolar, Transalveolar approach, Valsalva manoeuvre, Visual analogue scale.
Abstract
Objectives: To analyze the survival and success rates of implants installed utilizing the (transalveolar) osteotome technique, to compare peri‐implant soft tissue parameters and marginal bone levels of osteotome‐installed implants with implants placed using standard surgical procedures, and to evaluate patient‐centered outcomes.
Url:
DOI: 10.1111/j.1600-0501.2009.01704.x
Links to Exploration step
ISTEX:D42B7D27388328083BDB960AB5DAD9F3939FEDE1Le document en format XML
<record><TEI wicri:istexFullTextTei="biblStruct"><teiHeader><fileDesc><titleStmt><title xml:lang="en">Maxillary sinus floor elevation using the (transalveolar) osteotome technique with or without grafting material. Part I: implant survival and patients' perception</title><author><name sortKey="Pjetursson, Bjarni E" sort="Pjetursson, Bjarni E" uniqKey="Pjetursson B" first="Bjarni E." last="Pjetursson">Bjarni E. Pjetursson</name><affiliation><mods:affiliation>Faculty of Odontology, University of Iceland, Reykjavik, Iceland</mods:affiliation></affiliation><affiliation><mods:affiliation>University of Bern, School of Dental Medicine, Bern, Switzerland</mods:affiliation></affiliation></author><author><name sortKey="Rast, Claude" sort="Rast, Claude" uniqKey="Rast C" first="Claude" last="Rast">Claude Rast</name><affiliation><mods:affiliation>University of Bern, School of Dental Medicine, Bern, Switzerland</mods:affiliation></affiliation></author><author><name sortKey="Br Gger, Urs" sort="Br Gger, Urs" uniqKey="Br Gger U" first="Urs" last="Br Gger">Urs Br Gger</name><affiliation><mods:affiliation>University of Bern, School of Dental Medicine, Bern, Switzerland</mods:affiliation></affiliation></author><author><name sortKey="Schmidlin, Kurt" sort="Schmidlin, Kurt" uniqKey="Schmidlin K" first="Kurt" last="Schmidlin">Kurt Schmidlin</name><affiliation><mods:affiliation>Research Support Unit, Institute of Social and Preventive Medicine, University of Bern, Bern, Switzerland</mods:affiliation></affiliation></author><author><name sortKey="Zwahlen, Marcel" sort="Zwahlen, Marcel" uniqKey="Zwahlen M" first="Marcel" last="Zwahlen">Marcel Zwahlen</name><affiliation><mods:affiliation>Research Support Unit, Institute of Social and Preventive Medicine, University of Bern, Bern, Switzerland</mods:affiliation></affiliation></author><author><name sortKey="Lang, Niklaus P" sort="Lang, Niklaus P" uniqKey="Lang N" first="Niklaus P." last="Lang">Niklaus P. Lang</name><affiliation><mods:affiliation>University of Bern, School of Dental Medicine, Bern, Switzerland</mods:affiliation></affiliation><affiliation><mods:affiliation>Prince Philip Dental Hospital, University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong, SAR‐PRC</mods:affiliation></affiliation></author></titleStmt><publicationStmt><idno type="wicri:source">ISTEX</idno><idno type="RBID">ISTEX:D42B7D27388328083BDB960AB5DAD9F3939FEDE1</idno><date when="2009" year="2009">2009</date><idno type="doi">10.1111/j.1600-0501.2009.01704.x</idno><idno type="url">https://api.istex.fr/document/D42B7D27388328083BDB960AB5DAD9F3939FEDE1/fulltext/pdf</idno><idno type="wicri:Area/Istex/Corpus">006940</idno><idno type="wicri:explorRef" wicri:stream="Istex" wicri:step="Corpus" wicri:corpus="ISTEX">006940</idno></publicationStmt><sourceDesc><biblStruct><analytic><title level="a" type="main">Maxillary sinus floor elevation using the (transalveolar) osteotome technique with or without grafting material. Part I: implant survival and patients' perception</title><author><name sortKey="Pjetursson, Bjarni E" sort="Pjetursson, Bjarni E" uniqKey="Pjetursson B" first="Bjarni E." last="Pjetursson">Bjarni E. Pjetursson</name><affiliation><mods:affiliation>Faculty of Odontology, University of Iceland, Reykjavik, Iceland</mods:affiliation></affiliation><affiliation><mods:affiliation>University of Bern, School of Dental Medicine, Bern, Switzerland</mods:affiliation></affiliation></author><author><name sortKey="Rast, Claude" sort="Rast, Claude" uniqKey="Rast C" first="Claude" last="Rast">Claude Rast</name><affiliation><mods:affiliation>University of Bern, School of Dental Medicine, Bern, Switzerland</mods:affiliation></affiliation></author><author><name sortKey="Br Gger, Urs" sort="Br Gger, Urs" uniqKey="Br Gger U" first="Urs" last="Br Gger">Urs Br Gger</name><affiliation><mods:affiliation>University of Bern, School of Dental Medicine, Bern, Switzerland</mods:affiliation></affiliation></author><author><name sortKey="Schmidlin, Kurt" sort="Schmidlin, Kurt" uniqKey="Schmidlin K" first="Kurt" last="Schmidlin">Kurt Schmidlin</name><affiliation><mods:affiliation>Research Support Unit, Institute of Social and Preventive Medicine, University of Bern, Bern, Switzerland</mods:affiliation></affiliation></author><author><name sortKey="Zwahlen, Marcel" sort="Zwahlen, Marcel" uniqKey="Zwahlen M" first="Marcel" last="Zwahlen">Marcel Zwahlen</name><affiliation><mods:affiliation>Research Support Unit, Institute of Social and Preventive Medicine, University of Bern, Bern, Switzerland</mods:affiliation></affiliation></author><author><name sortKey="Lang, Niklaus P" sort="Lang, Niklaus P" uniqKey="Lang N" first="Niklaus P." last="Lang">Niklaus P. Lang</name><affiliation><mods:affiliation>University of Bern, School of Dental Medicine, Bern, Switzerland</mods:affiliation></affiliation><affiliation><mods:affiliation>Prince Philip Dental Hospital, University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong, SAR‐PRC</mods:affiliation></affiliation></author></analytic><monogr></monogr><series><title level="j" type="main">Clinical Oral Implants Research</title><title level="j" type="alt">CLINICAL ORAL IMPLANTS RESEARCH</title><idno type="ISSN">0905-7161</idno><idno type="eISSN">1600-0501</idno><imprint><biblScope unit="vol">20</biblScope><biblScope unit="issue">7</biblScope><biblScope unit="page" from="667">667</biblScope><biblScope unit="page" to="676">676</biblScope><biblScope unit="page-count">10</biblScope><publisher>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</publisher><pubPlace>Oxford, UK</pubPlace><date type="published" when="2009-07">2009-07</date></imprint><idno type="ISSN">0905-7161</idno></series></biblStruct></sourceDesc><seriesStmt><idno type="ISSN">0905-7161</idno></seriesStmt></fileDesc><profileDesc><textClass><keywords scheme="KwdEn" xml:lang="en"><term>Alveolar crest</term><term>Attachment levels</term><term>Biological complications</term><term>Bone height</term><term>Clin</term><term>Clinical examination</term><term>Compact bone</term><term>Control implants</term><term>Cumulative survival rate</term><term>Dental implants</term><term>Dental prosthesis</term><term>Diameter implant</term><term>Edentulous</term><term>Edentulous space</term><term>Elevation</term><term>Frequency analysis</term><term>Functional loading</term><term>Gger</term><term>Impl</term><term>Implant</term><term>Implant insertion</term><term>Implant length</term><term>Implant placement</term><term>Implant position</term><term>Implant shoulder</term><term>Implant site</term><term>Implant sites</term><term>Implant survival</term><term>Implant therapy</term><term>Implants implants</term><term>Implants research</term><term>Insertion</term><term>International journal</term><term>John wiley sons</term><term>Lang</term><term>Marginal bone level</term><term>Marginal bone levels</term><term>Maxilla</term><term>Maxillary</term><term>Maxillary sinus</term><term>Membrane perforation</term><term>Oblique sinus</term><term>Observation period</term><term>Oral impl</term><term>Osteotome</term><term>Osteotome implants</term><term>Osteotome sinus</term><term>Osteotome technique</term><term>Osteotomeinstalled implants</term><term>Osteotomes</term><term>Partial dentures</term><term>Perforation</term><term>Pjetursson</term><term>Pocket depth</term><term>Posterior maxilla</term><term>Present study</term><term>Residual</term><term>Residual bone height</term><term>Schneiderian membrane</term><term>Sinus</term><term>Sinus cavity</term><term>Sinus membrane</term><term>Soft tissue parameters</term><term>Standard implant placement</term><term>Standard implants</term><term>Straight osteotome</term><term>Success rates</term><term>Summers technique</term><term>Surgical</term><term>Surgical procedure</term><term>Survival rate</term><term>Survival rates</term><term>Systematic review</term><term>Systematic reviews</term><term>Tapered osteotome</term><term>Test implants</term><term>Transalveolar</term><term>Transalveolar approach</term><term>Valsalva manoeuvre</term><term>Visual analogue scale</term></keywords><keywords scheme="Teeft" xml:lang="en"><term>Alveolar crest</term><term>Attachment levels</term><term>Biological complications</term><term>Bone height</term><term>Clin</term><term>Clinical examination</term><term>Compact bone</term><term>Control implants</term><term>Cumulative survival rate</term><term>Dental implants</term><term>Dental prosthesis</term><term>Diameter implant</term><term>Edentulous</term><term>Edentulous space</term><term>Elevation</term><term>Frequency analysis</term><term>Functional loading</term><term>Gger</term><term>Impl</term><term>Implant</term><term>Implant insertion</term><term>Implant length</term><term>Implant placement</term><term>Implant position</term><term>Implant shoulder</term><term>Implant site</term><term>Implant sites</term><term>Implant survival</term><term>Implant therapy</term><term>Implants implants</term><term>Implants research</term><term>Insertion</term><term>International journal</term><term>John wiley sons</term><term>Lang</term><term>Marginal bone level</term><term>Marginal bone levels</term><term>Maxilla</term><term>Maxillary</term><term>Maxillary sinus</term><term>Membrane perforation</term><term>Oblique sinus</term><term>Observation period</term><term>Oral impl</term><term>Osteotome</term><term>Osteotome implants</term><term>Osteotome sinus</term><term>Osteotome technique</term><term>Osteotomeinstalled implants</term><term>Osteotomes</term><term>Partial dentures</term><term>Perforation</term><term>Pjetursson</term><term>Pocket depth</term><term>Posterior maxilla</term><term>Present study</term><term>Residual</term><term>Residual bone height</term><term>Schneiderian membrane</term><term>Sinus</term><term>Sinus cavity</term><term>Sinus membrane</term><term>Soft tissue parameters</term><term>Standard implant placement</term><term>Standard implants</term><term>Straight osteotome</term><term>Success rates</term><term>Summers technique</term><term>Surgical</term><term>Surgical procedure</term><term>Survival rate</term><term>Survival rates</term><term>Systematic review</term><term>Systematic reviews</term><term>Tapered osteotome</term><term>Test implants</term><term>Transalveolar</term><term>Transalveolar approach</term><term>Valsalva manoeuvre</term><term>Visual analogue scale</term></keywords></textClass></profileDesc></teiHeader><front><div type="abstract">Objectives: To analyze the survival and success rates of implants installed utilizing the (transalveolar) osteotome technique, to compare peri‐implant soft tissue parameters and marginal bone levels of osteotome‐installed implants with implants placed using standard surgical procedures, and to evaluate patient‐centered outcomes.</div></front></TEI><istex><corpusName>wiley</corpusName><keywords><teeft><json:string>implant</json:string><json:string>osteotome</json:string><json:string>sinus</json:string><json:string>osteotome technique</json:string><json:string>residual bone height</json:string><json:string>pjetursson</json:string><json:string>marginal bone levels</json:string><json:string>maxillary</json:string><json:string>control implants</json:string><json:string>residual</json:string><json:string>implant therapy</json:string><json:string>sinus cavity</json:string><json:string>perforation</json:string><json:string>impl</json:string><json:string>john wiley sons</json:string><json:string>oral impl</json:string><json:string>transalveolar</json:string><json:string>clin</json:string><json:string>maxillary sinus</json:string><json:string>present study</json:string><json:string>lang</json:string><json:string>implants research</json:string><json:string>gger</json:string><json:string>osteotomes</json:string><json:string>bone height</json:string><json:string>maxilla</json:string><json:string>survival rates</json:string><json:string>surgical</json:string><json:string>sinus membrane</json:string><json:string>frequency analysis</json:string><json:string>implant site</json:string><json:string>surgical procedure</json:string><json:string>dental implants</json:string><json:string>implant length</json:string><json:string>visual analogue scale</json:string><json:string>soft tissue parameters</json:string><json:string>alveolar crest</json:string><json:string>success rates</json:string><json:string>survival rate</json:string><json:string>systematic review</json:string><json:string>implant insertion</json:string><json:string>straight osteotome</json:string><json:string>membrane perforation</json:string><json:string>elevation</json:string><json:string>attachment levels</json:string><json:string>clinical examination</json:string><json:string>standard implants</json:string><json:string>observation period</json:string><json:string>implant placement</json:string><json:string>osteotome sinus</json:string><json:string>marginal bone level</json:string><json:string>pocket depth</json:string><json:string>insertion</json:string><json:string>edentulous</json:string><json:string>compact bone</json:string><json:string>implant position</json:string><json:string>tapered osteotome</json:string><json:string>implant sites</json:string><json:string>standard implant placement</json:string><json:string>cumulative survival rate</json:string><json:string>summers technique</json:string><json:string>valsalva manoeuvre</json:string><json:string>dental prosthesis</json:string><json:string>implant shoulder</json:string><json:string>schneiderian membrane</json:string><json:string>posterior maxilla</json:string><json:string>functional loading</json:string><json:string>edentulous space</json:string><json:string>osteotome implants</json:string><json:string>osteotomeinstalled implants</json:string><json:string>implants implants</json:string><json:string>diameter implant</json:string><json:string>test implants</json:string><json:string>biological complications</json:string><json:string>oblique sinus</json:string><json:string>systematic reviews</json:string><json:string>implant survival</json:string><json:string>partial dentures</json:string><json:string>transalveolar approach</json:string><json:string>international journal</json:string></teeft></keywords><author><json:item><name>Bjarni E. Pjetursson</name><affiliations><json:string>Faculty of Odontology, University of Iceland, Reykjavik, Iceland</json:string><json:string>University of Bern, School of Dental Medicine, Bern, Switzerland</json:string></affiliations></json:item><json:item><name>Claude Rast</name><affiliations><json:string>University of Bern, School of Dental Medicine, Bern, Switzerland</json:string></affiliations></json:item><json:item><name>Urs Brägger</name><affiliations><json:string>University of Bern, School of Dental Medicine, Bern, Switzerland</json:string></affiliations></json:item><json:item><name>Kurt Schmidlin</name><affiliations><json:string>Research Support Unit, Institute of Social and Preventive Medicine, University of Bern, Bern, Switzerland</json:string></affiliations></json:item><json:item><name>Marcel Zwahlen</name><affiliations><json:string>Research Support Unit, Institute of Social and Preventive Medicine, University of Bern, Bern, Switzerland</json:string></affiliations></json:item><json:item><name>Niklaus P. Lang</name><affiliations><json:string>University of Bern, School of Dental Medicine, Bern, Switzerland</json:string><json:string>Prince Philip Dental Hospital, University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong, SAR‐PRC</json:string></affiliations></json:item></author><subject><json:item><lang><json:string>eng</json:string></lang><value>biological complications</value></json:item><json:item><lang><json:string>eng</json:string></lang><value>bone augmentation</value></json:item><json:item><lang><json:string>eng</json:string></lang><value>bone grafting</value></json:item><json:item><lang><json:string>eng</json:string></lang><value>complications</value></json:item><json:item><lang><json:string>eng</json:string></lang><value>crestal approach</value></json:item><json:item><lang><json:string>eng</json:string></lang><value>dental implants</value></json:item><json:item><lang><json:string>eng</json:string></lang><value>failures</value></json:item><json:item><lang><json:string>eng</json:string></lang><value>longitudinal</value></json:item><json:item><lang><json:string>eng</json:string></lang><value>osteotome technique</value></json:item><json:item><lang><json:string>eng</json:string></lang><value>patients' perception</value></json:item><json:item><lang><json:string>eng</json:string></lang><value>patients' satisfaction</value></json:item><json:item><lang><json:string>eng</json:string></lang><value>peri‐implantitis</value></json:item><json:item><lang><json:string>eng</json:string></lang><value>sinus augmentation</value></json:item><json:item><lang><json:string>eng</json:string></lang><value>sinus floor elevation</value></json:item><json:item><lang><json:string>eng</json:string></lang><value>sinus grafting</value></json:item><json:item><lang><json:string>eng</json:string></lang><value>success</value></json:item><json:item><lang><json:string>eng</json:string></lang><value>survival</value></json:item><json:item><lang><json:string>eng</json:string></lang><value>transalveolar approach</value></json:item></subject><articleId><json:string>CLR1704</json:string></articleId><arkIstex>ark:/67375/WNG-S7RWDHW9-S</arkIstex><language><json:string>eng</json:string></language><originalGenre><json:string>article</json:string></originalGenre><abstract>Objectives: To analyze the survival and success rates of implants installed utilizing the (transalveolar) osteotome technique, to compare peri‐implant soft tissue parameters and marginal bone levels of osteotome‐installed implants with implants placed using standard surgical procedures, and to evaluate patient‐centered outcomes.</abstract><qualityIndicators><score>7.492</score><pdfWordCount>6317</pdfWordCount><pdfCharCount>40128</pdfCharCount><pdfVersion>1.3</pdfVersion><pdfPageCount>10</pdfPageCount><pdfPageSize>595.276 x 782.362 pts</pdfPageSize><refBibsNative>true</refBibsNative><abstractWordCount>41</abstractWordCount><abstractCharCount>330</abstractCharCount><keywordCount>18</keywordCount></qualityIndicators><title>Maxillary sinus floor elevation using the (transalveolar) osteotome technique with or without grafting material. Part I: implant survival and patients' perception</title><pmid><json:string>19486079</json:string></pmid><genre><json:string>article</json:string></genre><host><title>Clinical Oral Implants Research</title><language><json:string>unknown</json:string></language><doi><json:string>10.1111/(ISSN)1600-0501</json:string></doi><issn><json:string>0905-7161</json:string></issn><eissn><json:string>1600-0501</json:string></eissn><publisherId><json:string>CLR</json:string></publisherId><volume>20</volume><issue>7</issue><pages><first>667</first><last>676</last><total>10</total></pages><genre><json:string>journal</json:string></genre></host><namedEntities><unitex><date><json:string>2009</json:string><json:string>2000</json:string><json:string>1960s</json:string><json:string>2000 to 2005</json:string></date><geogName></geogName><orgName><json:string>Department of Periodontology and Fixed Prosthodontics</json:string><json:string>Matrox Electronic Systems</json:string><json:string>MAS Department of Prosthodontics University of Iceland Vatnsmyrarvegur</json:string><json:string>Hospital, University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong, SAR</json:string><json:string>XCP Instruments</json:string><json:string>Switzerland Kurt Schmidlin, Marcel Zwahlen, Research Support Unit, Institute of Social and Preventive Medicine</json:string><json:string>Rinn Corporation Elgin</json:string><json:string>BioOss Geistlich Sons Ltd</json:string><json:string>University of Bern</json:string><json:string>Switzerland Niklaus P</json:string><json:string>Iceland Tel</json:string><json:string>University of Bern, Switzerland</json:string><json:string>Stata Corporation</json:string></orgName><orgName_funder></orgName_funder><orgName_provider></orgName_provider><persName><json:string>Without</json:string><json:string>Philip Dental</json:string><json:string>John Wiley</json:string><json:string>Radiograph</json:string><json:string>E. Pjetursson</json:string><json:string>Claude Rast</json:string><json:string>Niklaus P. Lang</json:string></persName><placeName><json:string>TX</json:string><json:string>IL</json:string><json:string>College Station</json:string><json:string>Switzerland</json:string><json:string>Bern</json:string><json:string>Canada</json:string><json:string>USA</json:string><json:string>Japan</json:string><json:string>Tokyo</json:string><json:string>Chicago</json:string><json:string>Reykjavik</json:string></placeName><ref_url></ref_url><ref_bibl><json:string>Rosen et al. 1999</json:string><json:string>Engelke & Deckwer 1997</json:string><json:string>Kaplan & Meier 1958</json:string><json:string>Bruschi et al. 1998</json:string><json:string>Lang et al. 2004</json:string><json:string>Abrahamsson et al. 2004</json:string><json:string>Lekholm & Zarb 1985</json:string><json:string>Emmerich et al. (2005)</json:string><json:string>Pjetursson et al. 2004</json:string><json:string>Emmerich et al. 2005</json:string><json:string>Mombelli & Lang 1994</json:string><json:string>James (1980)</json:string><json:string>Ferrigno et al. 2006</json:string><json:string>Deporter et al. 2005</json:string><json:string>Boyne & James 1980</json:string><json:string>Jung et al. 2008</json:string><json:string>Pjetursson et al</json:string><json:string>Summers 1994</json:string><json:string>Lang et al. 1998</json:string><json:string>Lang et al. 2000</json:string></ref_bibl><bibl></bibl></unitex></namedEntities><ark><json:string>ark:/67375/WNG-S7RWDHW9-S</json:string></ark><categories><wos><json:string>1 - science</json:string><json:string>2 - engineering, biomedical</json:string><json:string>2 - dentistry, oral surgery & medicine</json:string></wos><scienceMetrix><json:string>1 - health sciences</json:string><json:string>2 - clinical medicine</json:string><json:string>3 - dentistry</json:string></scienceMetrix><scopus><json:string>1 - Health Sciences</json:string><json:string>2 - Dentistry</json:string><json:string>3 - Oral Surgery</json:string></scopus></categories><publicationDate>2009</publicationDate><copyrightDate>2009</copyrightDate><doi><json:string>10.1111/j.1600-0501.2009.01704.x</json:string></doi><id>D42B7D27388328083BDB960AB5DAD9F3939FEDE1</id><score>1</score><fulltext><json:item><extension>pdf</extension><original>true</original><mimetype>application/pdf</mimetype><uri>https://api.istex.fr/document/D42B7D27388328083BDB960AB5DAD9F3939FEDE1/fulltext/pdf</uri></json:item><json:item><extension>zip</extension><original>false</original><mimetype>application/zip</mimetype><uri>https://api.istex.fr/document/D42B7D27388328083BDB960AB5DAD9F3939FEDE1/fulltext/zip</uri></json:item><istex:fulltextTEI uri="https://api.istex.fr/document/D42B7D27388328083BDB960AB5DAD9F3939FEDE1/fulltext/tei"><teiHeader><fileDesc><titleStmt><title level="a" type="main">Maxillary sinus floor elevation using the (transalveolar) osteotome technique with or without grafting material. Part I: implant survival and patients' perception</title></titleStmt><publicationStmt><authority>ISTEX</authority><publisher>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</publisher><pubPlace>Oxford, UK</pubPlace><availability><licence>© 2009 John Wiley & Sons A/S</licence></availability><date type="published" when="2009-07"></date></publicationStmt><notesStmt><note type="content-type" subtype="article" source="article" scheme="https://content-type.data.istex.fr/ark:/67375/XTP-6N5SZHKN-D">article</note><note type="publication-type" subtype="journal" scheme="https://publication-type.data.istex.fr/ark:/67375/JMC-0GLKJH51-B">journal</note></notesStmt><sourceDesc><biblStruct type="article"><analytic><title level="a" type="main">Maxillary sinus floor elevation using the (transalveolar) osteotome technique with or without grafting material. Part I: implant survival and patients' perception</title><title level="a" type="short">Sinus floor elevation</title><author xml:id="author-0000"><persName><forename type="first">Bjarni E.</forename><surname>Pjetursson</surname></persName><affiliation>Faculty of Odontology, University of Iceland, Reykjavik, Iceland<address><country key="IS"></country></address></affiliation><affiliation>University of Bern, School of Dental Medicine, Bern, Switzerland<address><country key="CH"></country></address></affiliation></author><author xml:id="author-0001"><persName><forename type="first">Claude</forename><surname>Rast</surname></persName><affiliation>University of Bern, School of Dental Medicine, Bern, Switzerland<address><country key="CH"></country></address></affiliation></author><author xml:id="author-0002"><persName><forename type="first">Urs</forename><surname>Brägger</surname></persName><affiliation>University of Bern, School of Dental Medicine, Bern, Switzerland<address><country key="CH"></country></address></affiliation></author><author xml:id="author-0003"><persName><forename type="first">Kurt</forename><surname>Schmidlin</surname></persName><affiliation>Research Support Unit, Institute of Social and Preventive Medicine, University of Bern, Bern, Switzerland<address><country key="CH"></country></address></affiliation></author><author xml:id="author-0004"><persName><forename type="first">Marcel</forename><surname>Zwahlen</surname></persName><affiliation>Research Support Unit, Institute of Social and Preventive Medicine, University of Bern, Bern, Switzerland<address><country key="CH"></country></address></affiliation></author><author xml:id="author-0005"><persName><forename type="first">Niklaus P.</forename><surname>Lang</surname></persName><affiliation>University of Bern, School of Dental Medicine, Bern, Switzerland<address><country key="CH"></country></address></affiliation><affiliation>Prince Philip Dental Hospital, University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong, SAR‐PRC<address><country key="HK"></country></address></affiliation></author><idno type="istex">D42B7D27388328083BDB960AB5DAD9F3939FEDE1</idno><idno type="ark">ark:/67375/WNG-S7RWDHW9-S</idno><idno type="DOI">10.1111/j.1600-0501.2009.01704.x</idno><idno type="unit">CLR1704</idno><idno type="supplier">1704</idno><idno type="toTypesetVersion">file:CLR.CLR1704.pdf</idno></analytic><monogr><title level="j" type="main">Clinical Oral Implants Research</title><title level="j" type="alt">CLINICAL ORAL IMPLANTS RESEARCH</title><idno type="pISSN">0905-7161</idno><idno type="eISSN">1600-0501</idno><idno type="book-DOI">10.1111/(ISSN)1600-0501</idno><idno type="book-part-DOI">10.1111/clr.2009.20.issue-7</idno><idno type="product">CLR</idno><idno type="publisherDivision">ST</idno><imprint><biblScope unit="vol">20</biblScope><biblScope unit="issue">7</biblScope><biblScope unit="page" from="667">667</biblScope><biblScope unit="page" to="676">676</biblScope><biblScope unit="page-count">10</biblScope><publisher>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</publisher><pubPlace>Oxford, UK</pubPlace><date type="published" when="2009-07"></date></imprint></monogr></biblStruct></sourceDesc></fileDesc><profileDesc><abstract xml:lang="en" style="main"><head>Abstract</head><p><hi rend="bold">Objectives: </hi> To analyze the survival and success rates of implants installed utilizing the (transalveolar) osteotome technique, to compare peri‐implant soft tissue parameters and marginal bone levels of osteotome‐installed implants with implants placed using standard surgical procedures, and to evaluate patient‐centered outcomes.</p><p><hi rend="bold">Material and methods: </hi> During 2000 to 2005, 252 Straumann<hi rend="superscript">®</hi> dental implants were inserted in 181 patients. The surgical technique was a modification of the original osteotome technique presented by Summers. In addition to the clinical examination, the patients were asked to give their perception of the surgical procedure, utilizing a visual analogue scale.</p><p><hi rend="bold">Results: </hi> The cumulative survival rate of the osteotome‐installed implants after a mean follow‐up time of 3.2 years, was 97.4% (95% confidence intervals: 94.4–98.8%). From the 252 implants inserted, three were lost before loading and another three were lost in the first and second year. According to residual bone height the survival was 91.3% for implant sites with ≤4 mm residual bone height, and 90% for sites with 4 mm and 5 mm, when compared with that of 100% in sites with bone height of above 5 mm. According to implant length the survival rates were 100% for 12 mm, 98.7% for 10 mm, 98.7% for 8 mm and only 47.6% for 6 mm implants. Soft tissue parameters (pocket probing depth, probing attachment level, bleeding on probing and marginal bone levels) did not yield any differences between the osteotome‐installed and the conventionally placed implants. More than 90% of the patients were satisfied with the implant therapy and would undergo similar therapy again if necessary. The cost associated with implant therapy was considered to be justified.</p><p><hi rend="bold">Conclusion: </hi> In conclusion, the osteotome technique was a reliable method for implant insertion in the posterior maxilla, especially at sites with 5 mm or more of preoperative residual bone height and a relatively flat sinus floor.</p></abstract><textClass><keywords xml:lang="en"><term xml:id="k1">biological complications</term><term xml:id="k2">bone augmentation</term><term xml:id="k3">bone grafting</term><term xml:id="k4">complications</term><term xml:id="k5">crestal approach</term><term xml:id="k6">dental implants</term><term xml:id="k7">failures</term><term xml:id="k8">longitudinal</term><term xml:id="k9">osteotome technique</term><term xml:id="k10">patients' perception</term><term xml:id="k11">patients' satisfaction</term><term xml:id="k12">peri‐implantitis</term><term xml:id="k13">sinus augmentation</term><term xml:id="k14">sinus floor elevation</term><term xml:id="k15">sinus grafting</term><term xml:id="k16">success</term><term xml:id="k17">survival</term><term xml:id="k18">transalveolar approach</term></keywords><keywords rend="tocHeading1"><term>Original Articles</term></keywords></textClass><langUsage><language ident="en"></language></langUsage></profileDesc></teiHeader></istex:fulltextTEI><json:item><extension>txt</extension><original>false</original><mimetype>text/plain</mimetype><uri>https://api.istex.fr/document/D42B7D27388328083BDB960AB5DAD9F3939FEDE1/fulltext/txt</uri></json:item></fulltext><metadata><istex:metadataXml wicri:clean="Wiley, elements deleted: body"><istex:xmlDeclaration>version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" standalone="yes"</istex:xmlDeclaration><istex:document><component version="2.0" type="serialArticle" xml:lang="en"><header><publicationMeta level="product"><publisherInfo><publisherName>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</publisherName><publisherLoc>Oxford, UK</publisherLoc></publisherInfo><doi origin="wiley" registered="yes">10.1111/(ISSN)1600-0501</doi><issn type="print">0905-7161</issn><issn type="electronic">1600-0501</issn><idGroup><id type="product" value="CLR"></id><id type="publisherDivision" value="ST"></id></idGroup><titleGroup><title type="main" sort="CLINICAL ORAL IMPLANTS RESEARCH">Clinical Oral Implants Research</title></titleGroup></publicationMeta><publicationMeta level="part" position="07007"><doi origin="wiley">10.1111/clr.2009.20.issue-7</doi><numberingGroup><numbering type="journalVolume" number="20">20</numbering><numbering type="journalIssue" number="7">7</numbering></numberingGroup><coverDate startDate="2009-07">July 2009</coverDate></publicationMeta><publicationMeta level="unit" type="article" position="3" status="forIssue"><doi origin="wiley">10.1111/j.1600-0501.2009.01704.x</doi><idGroup><id type="unit" value="CLR1704"></id><id type="supplier" value="1704"></id></idGroup><countGroup><count type="pageTotal" number="10"></count></countGroup><titleGroup><title type="tocHeading1">Original Articles</title></titleGroup><copyright>© 2009 John Wiley & Sons A/S</copyright><eventGroup><event type="firstOnline" date="2009-05-26"></event><event type="publishedOnlineFinalForm" date="2009-06-04"></event><event type="xmlConverted" agent="Converter:BPG_TO_WML3G version:2.3.2 mode:FullText source:FullText result:FullText" date="2010-03-15"></event><event type="xmlConverted" agent="Converter:WILEY_ML3G_TO_WILEY_ML3GV2 version:4.0.1" date="2014-03-12"></event><event type="xmlConverted" agent="Converter:WML3G_To_WML3G version:4.1.7 mode:FullText,remove_FC" date="2014-10-16"></event></eventGroup><numberingGroup><numbering type="pageFirst" number="667">667</numbering><numbering type="pageLast" number="676">676</numbering></numberingGroup><correspondenceTo><b>Correspondence to:</b>
<i>Bjarni E Pjetursson</i>, DDS, Dr med. dent., MAS
Department of Prosthodontics
University of Iceland
Vatnsmyrarvegur 16
IS‐ 101 Reykjavik, Iceland
Tel.: +354 525 4850
Fax: +354 525 4874
e‐mail: <email normalForm="bep@hi.is">bep@hi.is</email></correspondenceTo><linkGroup><link type="toTypesetVersion" href="file:CLR.CLR1704.pdf"></link></linkGroup></publicationMeta><contentMeta><unparsedEditorialHistory><b>Date:</b> Accepted 15 December 2008</unparsedEditorialHistory><countGroup><count type="figureTotal" number="11"></count><count type="tableTotal" number="6"></count><count type="formulaTotal" number="0"></count><count type="referenceTotal" number="20"></count><count type="wordTotal" number="8031"></count><count type="linksCrossRef" number="38"></count></countGroup><titleGroup><title type="main">Maxillary sinus floor elevation using the (transalveolar) osteotome technique with or without grafting material. Part I: implant survival and patients' perception</title><title type="shortAuthors">Pjetursson et al.</title><title type="short">Sinus floor elevation</title></titleGroup><creators><creator creatorRole="author" xml:id="cr1" affiliationRef="#a1 #a2"><personName><givenNames>Bjarni E.</givenNames><familyName>Pjetursson</familyName></personName></creator><creator creatorRole="author" xml:id="cr2" affiliationRef="#a2"><personName><givenNames>Claude</givenNames><familyName>Rast</familyName></personName></creator><creator creatorRole="author" xml:id="cr3" affiliationRef="#a2"><personName><givenNames>Urs</givenNames><familyName>Brägger</familyName></personName></creator><creator creatorRole="author" xml:id="cr4" affiliationRef="#a3"><personName><givenNames>Kurt</givenNames><familyName>Schmidlin</familyName></personName></creator><creator creatorRole="author" xml:id="cr5" affiliationRef="#a3"><personName><givenNames>Marcel</givenNames><familyName>Zwahlen</familyName></personName></creator><creator creatorRole="author" xml:id="cr6" affiliationRef="#a2 #a4"><personName><givenNames>Niklaus P.</givenNames><familyName>Lang</familyName></personName></creator></creators><affiliationGroup><affiliation xml:id="a1" countryCode="IS"><unparsedAffiliation>Faculty of Odontology, University of Iceland, Reykjavik, Iceland</unparsedAffiliation></affiliation><affiliation xml:id="a2" countryCode="CH"><unparsedAffiliation>University of Bern, School of Dental Medicine, Bern, Switzerland</unparsedAffiliation></affiliation><affiliation xml:id="a3" countryCode="CH"><unparsedAffiliation>Research Support Unit, Institute of Social and Preventive Medicine, University of Bern, Bern, Switzerland</unparsedAffiliation></affiliation><affiliation xml:id="a4" countryCode="HK"><unparsedAffiliation>Prince Philip Dental Hospital, University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong, SAR‐PRC</unparsedAffiliation></affiliation></affiliationGroup><keywordGroup xml:lang="en"><keyword xml:id="k1">biological complications</keyword><keyword xml:id="k2">bone augmentation</keyword><keyword xml:id="k3">bone grafting</keyword><keyword xml:id="k4">complications</keyword><keyword xml:id="k5">crestal approach</keyword><keyword xml:id="k6">dental implants</keyword><keyword xml:id="k7">failures</keyword><keyword xml:id="k8">longitudinal</keyword><keyword xml:id="k9">osteotome technique</keyword><keyword xml:id="k10">patients' perception</keyword><keyword xml:id="k11">patients' satisfaction</keyword><keyword xml:id="k12">peri‐implantitis</keyword><keyword xml:id="k13">sinus augmentation</keyword><keyword xml:id="k14">sinus floor elevation</keyword><keyword xml:id="k15">sinus grafting</keyword><keyword xml:id="k16">success</keyword><keyword xml:id="k17">survival</keyword><keyword xml:id="k18">transalveolar approach</keyword></keywordGroup><abstractGroup><abstract type="main" xml:lang="en"><title type="main">Abstract</title><p><b>Objectives: </b> To analyze the survival and success rates of implants installed utilizing the (transalveolar) osteotome technique, to compare peri‐implant soft tissue parameters and marginal bone levels of osteotome‐installed implants with implants placed using standard surgical procedures, and to evaluate patient‐centered outcomes.</p><p><b>Material and methods: </b> During 2000 to 2005, 252 Straumann<sup>®</sup> dental implants were inserted in 181 patients. The surgical technique was a modification of the original osteotome technique presented by Summers. In addition to the clinical examination, the patients were asked to give their perception of the surgical procedure, utilizing a visual analogue scale.</p><p><b>Results: </b> The cumulative survival rate of the osteotome‐installed implants after a mean follow‐up time of 3.2 years, was 97.4% (95% confidence intervals: 94.4–98.8%). From the 252 implants inserted, three were lost before loading and another three were lost in the first and second year. According to residual bone height the survival was 91.3% for implant sites with ≤4 mm residual bone height, and 90% for sites with 4 mm and 5 mm, when compared with that of 100% in sites with bone height of above 5 mm. According to implant length the survival rates were 100% for 12 mm, 98.7% for 10 mm, 98.7% for 8 mm and only 47.6% for 6 mm implants. Soft tissue parameters (pocket probing depth, probing attachment level, bleeding on probing and marginal bone levels) did not yield any differences between the osteotome‐installed and the conventionally placed implants. More than 90% of the patients were satisfied with the implant therapy and would undergo similar therapy again if necessary. The cost associated with implant therapy was considered to be justified.</p><p><b>Conclusion: </b> In conclusion, the osteotome technique was a reliable method for implant insertion in the posterior maxilla, especially at sites with 5 mm or more of preoperative residual bone height and a relatively flat sinus floor.</p><!--
To cite this article:
Pjetursson BE, Rast C, Brägger U, Schmidlin K, Zwahlen M, Lang NP. Maxillary sinus floor elevation using the (transalveolar) osteotome technique with or without grafting material. Part I: implant survival and patients' perception.
Clin. Oral Impl. Res. 20, 2009; 667–676.
doi: 10.1111/j.1600-0501.2009.01704.x
--></abstract></abstractGroup></contentMeta></header></component></istex:document></istex:metadataXml><mods version="3.6"><titleInfo lang="en"><title>Maxillary sinus floor elevation using the (transalveolar) osteotome technique with or without grafting material. Part I: implant survival and patients' perception</title></titleInfo><titleInfo type="abbreviated" lang="en"><title>Sinus floor elevation</title></titleInfo><titleInfo type="alternative" contentType="CDATA" lang="en"><title>Maxillary sinus floor elevation using the (transalveolar) osteotome technique with or without grafting material. Part I: implant survival and patients' perception</title></titleInfo><name type="personal"><namePart type="given">Bjarni E.</namePart><namePart type="family">Pjetursson</namePart><affiliation>Faculty of Odontology, University of Iceland, Reykjavik, Iceland</affiliation><affiliation>University of Bern, School of Dental Medicine, Bern, Switzerland</affiliation><role><roleTerm type="text">author</roleTerm></role></name><name type="personal"><namePart type="given">Claude</namePart><namePart type="family">Rast</namePart><affiliation>University of Bern, School of Dental Medicine, Bern, Switzerland</affiliation><role><roleTerm type="text">author</roleTerm></role></name><name type="personal"><namePart type="given">Urs</namePart><namePart type="family">Brägger</namePart><affiliation>University of Bern, School of Dental Medicine, Bern, Switzerland</affiliation><role><roleTerm type="text">author</roleTerm></role></name><name type="personal"><namePart type="given">Kurt</namePart><namePart type="family">Schmidlin</namePart><affiliation>Research Support Unit, Institute of Social and Preventive Medicine, University of Bern, Bern, Switzerland</affiliation><role><roleTerm type="text">author</roleTerm></role></name><name type="personal"><namePart type="given">Marcel</namePart><namePart type="family">Zwahlen</namePart><affiliation>Research Support Unit, Institute of Social and Preventive Medicine, University of Bern, Bern, Switzerland</affiliation><role><roleTerm type="text">author</roleTerm></role></name><name type="personal"><namePart type="given">Niklaus P.</namePart><namePart type="family">Lang</namePart><affiliation>University of Bern, School of Dental Medicine, Bern, Switzerland</affiliation><affiliation>Prince Philip Dental Hospital, University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong, SAR‐PRC</affiliation><role><roleTerm type="text">author</roleTerm></role></name><typeOfResource>text</typeOfResource><genre type="article" displayLabel="article" authority="ISTEX" authorityURI="https://content-type.data.istex.fr" valueURI="https://content-type.data.istex.fr/ark:/67375/XTP-6N5SZHKN-D">article</genre><originInfo><publisher>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</publisher><place><placeTerm type="text">Oxford, UK</placeTerm></place><dateIssued encoding="w3cdtf">2009-07</dateIssued><edition>Date: Accepted 15 December 2008</edition><copyrightDate encoding="w3cdtf">2009</copyrightDate></originInfo><language><languageTerm type="code" authority="rfc3066">en</languageTerm><languageTerm type="code" authority="iso639-2b">eng</languageTerm></language><physicalDescription><extent unit="figures">11</extent><extent unit="tables">6</extent><extent unit="formulas">0</extent><extent unit="references">20</extent><extent unit="linksCrossRef">38</extent><extent unit="words">8031</extent></physicalDescription><abstract>Objectives: To analyze the survival and success rates of implants installed utilizing the (transalveolar) osteotome technique, to compare peri‐implant soft tissue parameters and marginal bone levels of osteotome‐installed implants with implants placed using standard surgical procedures, and to evaluate patient‐centered outcomes.</abstract><abstract>Material and methods: During 2000 to 2005, 252 Straumann® dental implants were inserted in 181 patients. The surgical technique was a modification of the original osteotome technique presented by Summers. In addition to the clinical examination, the patients were asked to give their perception of the surgical procedure, utilizing a visual analogue scale.</abstract><abstract>Results: The cumulative survival rate of the osteotome‐installed implants after a mean follow‐up time of 3.2 years, was 97.4% (95% confidence intervals: 94.4–98.8%). From the 252 implants inserted, three were lost before loading and another three were lost in the first and second year. According to residual bone height the survival was 91.3% for implant sites with ≤4 mm residual bone height, and 90% for sites with 4 mm and 5 mm, when compared with that of 100% in sites with bone height of above 5 mm. According to implant length the survival rates were 100% for 12 mm, 98.7% for 10 mm, 98.7% for 8 mm and only 47.6% for 6 mm implants. Soft tissue parameters (pocket probing depth, probing attachment level, bleeding on probing and marginal bone levels) did not yield any differences between the osteotome‐installed and the conventionally placed implants. More than 90% of the patients were satisfied with the implant therapy and would undergo similar therapy again if necessary. The cost associated with implant therapy was considered to be justified.</abstract><abstract>Conclusion: In conclusion, the osteotome technique was a reliable method for implant insertion in the posterior maxilla, especially at sites with 5 mm or more of preoperative residual bone height and a relatively flat sinus floor.</abstract><subject lang="en"><genre>keywords</genre><topic>biological complications</topic><topic>bone augmentation</topic><topic>bone grafting</topic><topic>complications</topic><topic>crestal approach</topic><topic>dental implants</topic><topic>failures</topic><topic>longitudinal</topic><topic>osteotome technique</topic><topic>patients' perception</topic><topic>patients' satisfaction</topic><topic>peri‐implantitis</topic><topic>sinus augmentation</topic><topic>sinus floor elevation</topic><topic>sinus grafting</topic><topic>success</topic><topic>survival</topic><topic>transalveolar approach</topic></subject><relatedItem type="host"><titleInfo><title>Clinical Oral Implants Research</title></titleInfo><genre type="journal" authority="ISTEX" authorityURI="https://publication-type.data.istex.fr" valueURI="https://publication-type.data.istex.fr/ark:/67375/JMC-0GLKJH51-B">journal</genre><identifier type="ISSN">0905-7161</identifier><identifier type="eISSN">1600-0501</identifier><identifier type="DOI">10.1111/(ISSN)1600-0501</identifier><identifier type="PublisherID">CLR</identifier><part><date>2009</date><detail type="volume"><caption>vol.</caption><number>20</number></detail><detail type="issue"><caption>no.</caption><number>7</number></detail><extent unit="pages"><start>667</start><end>676</end><total>10</total></extent></part></relatedItem><identifier type="istex">D42B7D27388328083BDB960AB5DAD9F3939FEDE1</identifier><identifier type="ark">ark:/67375/WNG-S7RWDHW9-S</identifier><identifier type="DOI">10.1111/j.1600-0501.2009.01704.x</identifier><identifier type="ArticleID">CLR1704</identifier><accessCondition type="use and reproduction" contentType="copyright">© 2009 John Wiley & Sons A/S</accessCondition><recordInfo><recordContentSource authority="ISTEX" authorityURI="https://loaded-corpus.data.istex.fr" valueURI="https://loaded-corpus.data.istex.fr/ark:/67375/XBH-L0C46X92-X">wiley</recordContentSource><recordOrigin>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</recordOrigin></recordInfo></mods><json:item><extension>json</extension><original>false</original><mimetype>application/json</mimetype><uri>https://api.istex.fr/document/D42B7D27388328083BDB960AB5DAD9F3939FEDE1/metadata/json</uri></json:item></metadata><serie></serie></istex></record>Pour manipuler ce document sous Unix (Dilib)
EXPLOR_STEP=$WICRI_ROOT/Wicri/Santé/explor/EdenteV2/Data/Istex/Corpus
HfdSelect -h $EXPLOR_STEP/biblio.hfd -nk 006940 | SxmlIndent | more
Ou
HfdSelect -h $EXPLOR_AREA/Data/Istex/Corpus/biblio.hfd -nk 006940 | SxmlIndent | more
Pour mettre un lien sur cette page dans le réseau Wicri
{{Explor lien
|wiki= Wicri/Santé
|area= EdenteV2
|flux= Istex
|étape= Corpus
|type= RBID
|clé= ISTEX:D42B7D27388328083BDB960AB5DAD9F3939FEDE1
|texte= Maxillary sinus floor elevation using the (transalveolar) osteotome technique with or without grafting material. Part I: implant survival and patients' perception
}}
| This area was generated with Dilib version V0.6.32. |  |