Serveur d'exploration sur le patient édenté

Attention, ce site est en cours de développement !
Attention, site généré par des moyens informatiques à partir de corpus bruts.
Les informations ne sont donc pas validées.

The forest issue in post-UNCED international negotiations: conflicting interests and fora for reconciliation

Identifieur interne : 006868 ( Istex/Corpus ); précédent : 006867; suivant : 006869

The forest issue in post-UNCED international negotiations: conflicting interests and fora for reconciliation

Auteurs : G. Kristin Rosendal

Source :

RBID : ISTEX:D2A839B1B8B6092128D0F96A4CFDD6C3DE76094A

English descriptors

Abstract

Abstract: The article is concerned with the international deliberations for a follow-up mechanism of the UNCED Statement of Forest Principles. The forest issue is complicated by the different scientific approaches to the deforestation problem, as represented by climate change and biodiversity respectively. From the former perspective, reforestation may seem an adequate remedy to solve the problem, while from the latter, biodiversity, much more weight must be put on conservation and sustainable utilization. An additional complication is presented by the political divide between developing and industrialized countries concerning the approach to the problem of deforestation. The focus of the article is on the current three main international arenas in which the issue is being discussed: (i) addressing the forest issue within the framework of the Convention on Biological Diversity, (ii) enlarging the scope of the International Agreement on Tropical Timber (ITTA) to include all types of forests, and (iii) pursuing the forest issue in a World Commission on Forests and Sustainable Development. The feasibility of achieving agreement and effective implementation within the framework of the various options is the focal point of the discussion.

Url:
DOI: 10.1007/BF00115315

Links to Exploration step

ISTEX:D2A839B1B8B6092128D0F96A4CFDD6C3DE76094A

Le document en format XML

<record>
<TEI wicri:istexFullTextTei="biblStruct">
<teiHeader>
<fileDesc>
<titleStmt>
<title xml:lang="en">The forest issue in post-UNCED international negotiations: conflicting interests and fora for reconciliation</title>
<author>
<name sortKey="Rosendal, G Kristin" sort="Rosendal, G Kristin" uniqKey="Rosendal G" first="G. Kristin" last="Rosendal">G. Kristin Rosendal</name>
<affiliation>
<mods:affiliation>The Fridtjof Nansen Institute, PO Box 326, N-1324, Lysaker, Norway</mods:affiliation>
</affiliation>
</author>
</titleStmt>
<publicationStmt>
<idno type="wicri:source">ISTEX</idno>
<idno type="RBID">ISTEX:D2A839B1B8B6092128D0F96A4CFDD6C3DE76094A</idno>
<date when="1995" year="1995">1995</date>
<idno type="doi">10.1007/BF00115315</idno>
<idno type="url">https://api.istex.fr/document/D2A839B1B8B6092128D0F96A4CFDD6C3DE76094A/fulltext/pdf</idno>
<idno type="wicri:Area/Istex/Corpus">006868</idno>
<idno type="wicri:explorRef" wicri:stream="Istex" wicri:step="Corpus" wicri:corpus="ISTEX">006868</idno>
</publicationStmt>
<sourceDesc>
<biblStruct>
<analytic>
<title level="a" type="main" xml:lang="en">The forest issue in post-UNCED international negotiations: conflicting interests and fora for reconciliation</title>
<author>
<name sortKey="Rosendal, G Kristin" sort="Rosendal, G Kristin" uniqKey="Rosendal G" first="G. Kristin" last="Rosendal">G. Kristin Rosendal</name>
<affiliation>
<mods:affiliation>The Fridtjof Nansen Institute, PO Box 326, N-1324, Lysaker, Norway</mods:affiliation>
</affiliation>
</author>
</analytic>
<monogr></monogr>
<series>
<title level="j">Biodiversity & Conservation</title>
<title level="j" type="abbrev">Biodivers Conserv</title>
<idno type="ISSN">0960-3115</idno>
<idno type="eISSN">1572-9710</idno>
<imprint>
<publisher>Kluwer Academic Publishers</publisher>
<pubPlace>Dordrecht</pubPlace>
<date type="published" when="1995-02-01">1995-02-01</date>
<biblScope unit="volume">4</biblScope>
<biblScope unit="issue">1</biblScope>
<biblScope unit="page" from="91">91</biblScope>
<biblScope unit="page" to="107">107</biblScope>
</imprint>
<idno type="ISSN">0960-3115</idno>
</series>
</biblStruct>
</sourceDesc>
<seriesStmt>
<idno type="ISSN">0960-3115</idno>
</seriesStmt>
</fileDesc>
<profileDesc>
<textClass>
<keywords scheme="KwdEn" xml:lang="en">
<term>Actor interests</term>
<term>Biodiversity</term>
<term>Biodiversity convention</term>
<term>Biological diversity</term>
<term>Climate change</term>
<term>Clinton administration</term>
<term>Conflict line</term>
<term>Conflict lines</term>
<term>Conservation areas</term>
<term>Consumer countries</term>
<term>Contracting parties</term>
<term>Controversial issue linkages</term>
<term>Controversial items</term>
<term>Council meeting</term>
<term>Deforestation</term>
<term>Deforestation problem</term>
<term>Delhi declaration</term>
<term>Different perspectives</term>
<term>Ecological sense</term>
<term>Ecological standards</term>
<term>Environmental impact assessments</term>
<term>European council</term>
<term>Export earnings</term>
<term>Feasibility</term>
<term>Financial mechanisms</term>
<term>Forest</term>
<term>Forest commission</term>
<term>Forest commission proposal</term>
<term>Forest conservation</term>
<term>Forest convention</term>
<term>Forest initiatives</term>
<term>Forest instrument</term>
<term>Forest issue</term>
<term>Forest management</term>
<term>Forest options</term>
<term>Forest principles</term>
<term>Forest protocol</term>
<term>Forest resources</term>
<term>Forest statement</term>
<term>Forestry</term>
<term>Forestry forum</term>
<term>Forestry sector</term>
<term>Former minister</term>
<term>Future action</term>
<term>General assembly</term>
<term>Genetic resources</term>
<term>Global</term>
<term>Global forest conference</term>
<term>Global forest strategy</term>
<term>Guideline</term>
<term>High score</term>
<term>Important part</term>
<term>Institutional mechanisms</term>
<term>International agreement</term>
<term>International arena</term>
<term>International arrangement</term>
<term>International forest instrument</term>
<term>International forest negotiations</term>
<term>International level</term>
<term>International negotiations</term>
<term>International trade</term>
<term>Itt0</term>
<term>Itt0 council decision</term>
<term>Itta</term>
<term>June</term>
<term>Large areas</term>
<term>Large number</term>
<term>Local interests</term>
<term>Local level</term>
<term>Local participation</term>
<term>Member states</term>
<term>Ministerial conference</term>
<term>National interests</term>
<term>National obligations</term>
<term>Negotiation</term>
<term>Option</term>
<term>Political environment</term>
<term>Political feasibility</term>
<term>Previous proposals</term>
<term>Producer countries</term>
<term>Qualitative aspects</term>
<term>Recent years</term>
<term>Resource</term>
<term>Rosendal</term>
<term>Same time</term>
<term>Scientific input</term>
<term>Similar standards</term>
<term>Successful implementation</term>
<term>Sustainable</term>
<term>Sustainable development</term>
<term>Sustainable forest management</term>
<term>Sustainable management</term>
<term>Swedish ambassador</term>
<term>Temperate</term>
<term>Temperate countries</term>
<term>Temperate forest countries</term>
<term>Temperate forests</term>
<term>Temperate zones</term>
<term>Timber agreement</term>
<term>Timber organization</term>
<term>Timber trade</term>
<term>Traditional focus</term>
<term>Transaction costs</term>
<term>Tropical</term>
<term>Tropical countries</term>
<term>Tropical forest countries</term>
<term>Tropical forests</term>
<term>Tropical timber</term>
<term>Ullstein</term>
<term>Unced</term>
<term>Unced prepcom meetings</term>
<term>Various proposals</term>
<term>Watershed protection</term>
<term>World commission</term>
<term>World resources institute</term>
<term>Wrong tree</term>
</keywords>
<keywords scheme="Teeft" xml:lang="en">
<term>Actor interests</term>
<term>Biodiversity</term>
<term>Biodiversity convention</term>
<term>Biological diversity</term>
<term>Climate change</term>
<term>Clinton administration</term>
<term>Conflict line</term>
<term>Conflict lines</term>
<term>Conservation areas</term>
<term>Consumer countries</term>
<term>Contracting parties</term>
<term>Controversial issue linkages</term>
<term>Controversial items</term>
<term>Council meeting</term>
<term>Deforestation</term>
<term>Deforestation problem</term>
<term>Delhi declaration</term>
<term>Different perspectives</term>
<term>Ecological sense</term>
<term>Ecological standards</term>
<term>Environmental impact assessments</term>
<term>European council</term>
<term>Export earnings</term>
<term>Feasibility</term>
<term>Financial mechanisms</term>
<term>Forest</term>
<term>Forest commission</term>
<term>Forest commission proposal</term>
<term>Forest conservation</term>
<term>Forest convention</term>
<term>Forest initiatives</term>
<term>Forest instrument</term>
<term>Forest issue</term>
<term>Forest management</term>
<term>Forest options</term>
<term>Forest principles</term>
<term>Forest protocol</term>
<term>Forest resources</term>
<term>Forest statement</term>
<term>Forestry</term>
<term>Forestry forum</term>
<term>Forestry sector</term>
<term>Former minister</term>
<term>Future action</term>
<term>General assembly</term>
<term>Genetic resources</term>
<term>Global</term>
<term>Global forest conference</term>
<term>Global forest strategy</term>
<term>Guideline</term>
<term>High score</term>
<term>Important part</term>
<term>Institutional mechanisms</term>
<term>International agreement</term>
<term>International arena</term>
<term>International arrangement</term>
<term>International forest instrument</term>
<term>International forest negotiations</term>
<term>International level</term>
<term>International negotiations</term>
<term>International trade</term>
<term>Itt0</term>
<term>Itt0 council decision</term>
<term>Itta</term>
<term>June</term>
<term>Large areas</term>
<term>Large number</term>
<term>Local interests</term>
<term>Local level</term>
<term>Local participation</term>
<term>Member states</term>
<term>Ministerial conference</term>
<term>National interests</term>
<term>National obligations</term>
<term>Negotiation</term>
<term>Option</term>
<term>Political environment</term>
<term>Political feasibility</term>
<term>Previous proposals</term>
<term>Producer countries</term>
<term>Qualitative aspects</term>
<term>Recent years</term>
<term>Resource</term>
<term>Rosendal</term>
<term>Same time</term>
<term>Scientific input</term>
<term>Similar standards</term>
<term>Successful implementation</term>
<term>Sustainable</term>
<term>Sustainable development</term>
<term>Sustainable forest management</term>
<term>Sustainable management</term>
<term>Swedish ambassador</term>
<term>Temperate</term>
<term>Temperate countries</term>
<term>Temperate forest countries</term>
<term>Temperate forests</term>
<term>Temperate zones</term>
<term>Timber agreement</term>
<term>Timber organization</term>
<term>Timber trade</term>
<term>Traditional focus</term>
<term>Transaction costs</term>
<term>Tropical</term>
<term>Tropical countries</term>
<term>Tropical forest countries</term>
<term>Tropical forests</term>
<term>Tropical timber</term>
<term>Ullstein</term>
<term>Unced</term>
<term>Unced prepcom meetings</term>
<term>Various proposals</term>
<term>Watershed protection</term>
<term>World commission</term>
<term>World resources institute</term>
<term>Wrong tree</term>
</keywords>
</textClass>
<langUsage>
<language ident="en">en</language>
</langUsage>
</profileDesc>
</teiHeader>
<front>
<div type="abstract" xml:lang="en">Abstract: The article is concerned with the international deliberations for a follow-up mechanism of the UNCED Statement of Forest Principles. The forest issue is complicated by the different scientific approaches to the deforestation problem, as represented by climate change and biodiversity respectively. From the former perspective, reforestation may seem an adequate remedy to solve the problem, while from the latter, biodiversity, much more weight must be put on conservation and sustainable utilization. An additional complication is presented by the political divide between developing and industrialized countries concerning the approach to the problem of deforestation. The focus of the article is on the current three main international arenas in which the issue is being discussed: (i) addressing the forest issue within the framework of the Convention on Biological Diversity, (ii) enlarging the scope of the International Agreement on Tropical Timber (ITTA) to include all types of forests, and (iii) pursuing the forest issue in a World Commission on Forests and Sustainable Development. The feasibility of achieving agreement and effective implementation within the framework of the various options is the focal point of the discussion.</div>
</front>
</TEI>
<istex>
<corpusName>springer</corpusName>
<keywords>
<teeft>
<json:string>biodiversity</json:string>
<json:string>forest statement</json:string>
<json:string>sustainable</json:string>
<json:string>forest management</json:string>
<json:string>deforestation</json:string>
<json:string>climate change</json:string>
<json:string>itt0</json:string>
<json:string>tropical forests</json:string>
<json:string>actor interests</json:string>
<json:string>forest resources</json:string>
<json:string>rosendal</json:string>
<json:string>biodiversity convention</json:string>
<json:string>forest principles</json:string>
<json:string>international negotiations</json:string>
<json:string>biological diversity</json:string>
<json:string>forestry</json:string>
<json:string>june</json:string>
<json:string>itta</json:string>
<json:string>unced</json:string>
<json:string>tropical countries</json:string>
<json:string>tropical timber</json:string>
<json:string>sustainable development</json:string>
<json:string>guideline</json:string>
<json:string>political feasibility</json:string>
<json:string>ullstein</json:string>
<json:string>high score</json:string>
<json:string>forest issue</json:string>
<json:string>forest convention</json:string>
<json:string>forest commission</json:string>
<json:string>world commission</json:string>
<json:string>producer countries</json:string>
<json:string>forest options</json:string>
<json:string>local interests</json:string>
<json:string>temperate countries</json:string>
<json:string>temperate</json:string>
<json:string>general assembly</json:string>
<json:string>institutional mechanisms</json:string>
<json:string>successful implementation</json:string>
<json:string>large number</json:string>
<json:string>global</json:string>
<json:string>financial mechanisms</json:string>
<json:string>transaction costs</json:string>
<json:string>forest instrument</json:string>
<json:string>deforestation problem</json:string>
<json:string>forest conservation</json:string>
<json:string>national interests</json:string>
<json:string>temperate forests</json:string>
<json:string>various proposals</json:string>
<json:string>scientific input</json:string>
<json:string>delhi declaration</json:string>
<json:string>member states</json:string>
<json:string>global forest strategy</json:string>
<json:string>similar standards</json:string>
<json:string>timber trade</json:string>
<json:string>forest protocol</json:string>
<json:string>sustainable management</json:string>
<json:string>sustainable forest management</json:string>
<json:string>ministerial conference</json:string>
<json:string>international level</json:string>
<json:string>european council</json:string>
<json:string>negotiation</json:string>
<json:string>conflict lines</json:string>
<json:string>watershed protection</json:string>
<json:string>international forest negotiations</json:string>
<json:string>conflict line</json:string>
<json:string>tropical forest countries</json:string>
<json:string>temperate forest countries</json:string>
<json:string>large areas</json:string>
<json:string>temperate zones</json:string>
<json:string>forestry sector</json:string>
<json:string>important part</json:string>
<json:string>wrong tree</json:string>
<json:string>controversial items</json:string>
<json:string>export earnings</json:string>
<json:string>unced prepcom meetings</json:string>
<json:string>clinton administration</json:string>
<json:string>contracting parties</json:string>
<json:string>genetic resources</json:string>
<json:string>political environment</json:string>
<json:string>timber agreement</json:string>
<json:string>international trade</json:string>
<json:string>previous proposals</json:string>
<json:string>international arrangement</json:string>
<json:string>consumer countries</json:string>
<json:string>local level</json:string>
<json:string>traditional focus</json:string>
<json:string>controversial issue linkages</json:string>
<json:string>qualitative aspects</json:string>
<json:string>recent years</json:string>
<json:string>local participation</json:string>
<json:string>environmental impact assessments</json:string>
<json:string>itt0 council decision</json:string>
<json:string>same time</json:string>
<json:string>council meeting</json:string>
<json:string>forest commission proposal</json:string>
<json:string>ecological standards</json:string>
<json:string>national obligations</json:string>
<json:string>swedish ambassador</json:string>
<json:string>timber organization</json:string>
<json:string>global forest conference</json:string>
<json:string>former minister</json:string>
<json:string>ecological sense</json:string>
<json:string>forest initiatives</json:string>
<json:string>international forest instrument</json:string>
<json:string>world resources institute</json:string>
<json:string>different perspectives</json:string>
<json:string>international agreement</json:string>
<json:string>international arena</json:string>
<json:string>conservation areas</json:string>
<json:string>future action</json:string>
<json:string>forestry forum</json:string>
<json:string>feasibility</json:string>
<json:string>tropical</json:string>
<json:string>resource</json:string>
<json:string>forest</json:string>
<json:string>option</json:string>
</teeft>
</keywords>
<author>
<json:item>
<name>G. Kristin Rosendal</name>
<affiliations>
<json:string>The Fridtjof Nansen Institute, PO Box 326, N-1324, Lysaker, Norway</json:string>
</affiliations>
</json:item>
</author>
<articleId>
<json:string>BF00115315</json:string>
<json:string>Art5</json:string>
</articleId>
<arkIstex>ark:/67375/1BB-K79G2TXG-8</arkIstex>
<language>
<json:string>eng</json:string>
</language>
<originalGenre>
<json:string>OriginalPaper</json:string>
</originalGenre>
<abstract>Abstract: The article is concerned with the international deliberations for a follow-up mechanism of the UNCED Statement of Forest Principles. The forest issue is complicated by the different scientific approaches to the deforestation problem, as represented by climate change and biodiversity respectively. From the former perspective, reforestation may seem an adequate remedy to solve the problem, while from the latter, biodiversity, much more weight must be put on conservation and sustainable utilization. An additional complication is presented by the political divide between developing and industrialized countries concerning the approach to the problem of deforestation. The focus of the article is on the current three main international arenas in which the issue is being discussed: (i) addressing the forest issue within the framework of the Convention on Biological Diversity, (ii) enlarging the scope of the International Agreement on Tropical Timber (ITTA) to include all types of forests, and (iii) pursuing the forest issue in a World Commission on Forests and Sustainable Development. The feasibility of achieving agreement and effective implementation within the framework of the various options is the focal point of the discussion.</abstract>
<qualityIndicators>
<score>9.196</score>
<pdfWordCount>8060</pdfWordCount>
<pdfCharCount>51234</pdfCharCount>
<pdfVersion>1.3</pdfVersion>
<pdfPageCount>17</pdfPageCount>
<pdfPageSize>467.84 x 684.28 pts</pdfPageSize>
<refBibsNative>false</refBibsNative>
<abstractWordCount>183</abstractWordCount>
<abstractCharCount>1253</abstractCharCount>
<keywordCount>0</keywordCount>
</qualityIndicators>
<title>The forest issue in post-UNCED international negotiations: conflicting interests and fora for reconciliation</title>
<genre>
<json:string>research-article</json:string>
</genre>
<host>
<title>Biodiversity & Conservation</title>
<language>
<json:string>unknown</json:string>
</language>
<publicationDate>1995</publicationDate>
<copyrightDate>1995</copyrightDate>
<issn>
<json:string>0960-3115</json:string>
</issn>
<eissn>
<json:string>1572-9710</json:string>
</eissn>
<journalId>
<json:string>10531</json:string>
</journalId>
<volume>4</volume>
<issue>1</issue>
<pages>
<first>91</first>
<last>107</last>
</pages>
<genre>
<json:string>journal</json:string>
</genre>
<subject>
<json:item>
<value>Evolutionary Biology</value>
</json:item>
<json:item>
<value>Tree Biology</value>
</json:item>
<json:item>
<value>Plant Sciences</value>
</json:item>
</subject>
</host>
<namedEntities>
<unitex>
<date>
<json:string>2000</json:string>
<json:string>1993</json:string>
<json:string>1982</json:string>
<json:string>1987</json:string>
<json:string>November-December 1990</json:string>
<json:string>1994</json:string>
<json:string>1990</json:string>
<json:string>1995</json:string>
<json:string>1989</json:string>
<json:string>1994-04-20</json:string>
</date>
<geogName>
<json:string>Sea Convention</json:string>
</geogName>
<orgName>
<json:string>World Bank</json:string>
<json:string>International Tropical Timber Organization</json:string>
<json:string>Australia, the Pacific Northwest of USA and Canada, Chile</json:string>
<json:string>Inter-Governmental Committee on Biological Diversity</json:string>
<json:string>Indonesia, Professor Jose Goldemberg</json:string>
<json:string>World Commission on Forests and Sustainable Development</json:string>
<json:string>ITTA The International</json:string>
<json:string>Brundtland Commission, and George Woodwell</json:string>
<json:string>Norway/UNEP</json:string>
<json:string>Committee on the Environment, Public Health and Consumer Protection</json:string>
<json:string>Organization</json:string>
<json:string>Committee on Forestry and Agriculture</json:string>
<json:string>US and the EC</json:string>
<json:string>Ministry of Environment</json:string>
<json:string>Sweden, Canada, Germany, USA</json:string>
<json:string>Preparatory Committee for the UNCED</json:string>
<json:string>World Commission for Forests and Sustainable Development</json:string>
<json:string>IGC</json:string>
<json:string>UN Commission on Sustainable Development</json:string>
<json:string>Environmental Imperative Declaration</json:string>
<json:string>Switzerland, IUCN</json:string>
<json:string>European Parliament</json:string>
<json:string>Brazil, General</json:string>
<json:string>Nigeria, Ashok Khosla of Development Alternatives</json:string>
<json:string>ITTO</json:string>
</orgName>
<orgName_funder></orgName_funder>
<orgName_provider></orgName_provider>
<persName>
<json:string>Emil Salem</json:string>
<json:string>Jim McNeill</json:string>
<json:string>General</json:string>
<json:string>Convention</json:string>
<json:string>Presentation</json:string>
<json:string>Ola Ullstein</json:string>
<json:string>Clinton Administration</json:string>
<json:string>J.P. Borring</json:string>
</persName>
<placeName>
<json:string>Geneva</json:string>
<json:string>Switzerland</json:string>
<json:string>Yugoslavia</json:string>
<json:string>Finland</json:string>
<json:string>Australia</json:string>
<json:string>New Delhi</json:string>
<json:string>Brazil</json:string>
<json:string>Montreal</json:string>
<json:string>Canada</json:string>
<json:string>Houston</json:string>
<json:string>Helsinki</json:string>
<json:string>Trondheim</json:string>
<json:string>Wettestad</json:string>
<json:string>India</json:string>
<json:string>Perth</json:string>
<json:string>Europe</json:string>
<json:string>America</json:string>
<json:string>Indonesia</json:string>
<json:string>Dublin</json:string>
<json:string>Portugal</json:string>
<json:string>France</json:string>
<json:string>Iceland</json:string>
<json:string>Sao Paulo</json:string>
<json:string>Italy</json:string>
<json:string>Sweden</json:string>
<json:string>Delhi</json:string>
</placeName>
<ref_url></ref_url>
<ref_bibl>
<json:string>Miles et al., 1989</json:string>
<json:string>Wilson, 1988</json:string>
<json:string>Rio, 1992</json:string>
<json:string>Underdal, 1980</json:string>
<json:string>Ullstein, 1993</json:string>
<json:string>Houghton et al., 1983</json:string>
<json:string>Objective 2000</json:string>
<json:string>Mittermeier and International negotiations on forest management 99 Bowles, 1993</json:string>
<json:string>Houghton, 1990</json:string>
<json:string>May 1992</json:string>
<json:string>Young, 1982</json:string>
<json:string>Myers, 1992</json:string>
<json:string>Dudley, 1992</json:string>
<json:string>Helsinki, June, 1993</json:string>
<json:string>IPCC, 1990</json:string>
<json:string>Rosendal, 1993</json:string>
<json:string>Roychowdhury and Sharma, 1993</json:string>
<json:string>Chase, 1993</json:string>
<json:string>Jager and Ferguson, 1991</json:string>
<json:string>Rosendal, 1992</json:string>
<json:string>Humphreys, 1992</json:string>
<json:string>Sedjo, 1992</json:string>
<json:string>May 1990</json:string>
<json:string>MacKenzie, 1993</json:string>
<json:string>March 1994</json:string>
</ref_bibl>
<bibl></bibl>
</unitex>
</namedEntities>
<ark>
<json:string>ark:/67375/1BB-K79G2TXG-8</json:string>
</ark>
<categories>
<wos>
<json:string>1 - science</json:string>
<json:string>2 - environmental sciences</json:string>
<json:string>2 - ecology</json:string>
<json:string>2 - biodiversity conservation</json:string>
</wos>
<scienceMetrix>
<json:string>1 - natural sciences</json:string>
<json:string>2 - biology</json:string>
<json:string>3 - ecology</json:string>
</scienceMetrix>
<scopus>
<json:string>1 - Physical Sciences</json:string>
<json:string>2 - Environmental Science</json:string>
<json:string>3 - Nature and Landscape Conservation</json:string>
<json:string>1 - Physical Sciences</json:string>
<json:string>2 - Environmental Science</json:string>
<json:string>3 - Ecology</json:string>
<json:string>1 - Life Sciences</json:string>
<json:string>2 - Agricultural and Biological Sciences</json:string>
<json:string>3 - Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics</json:string>
</scopus>
<inist>
<json:string>1 - sciences appliquees, technologies et medecines</json:string>
<json:string>2 - sciences biologiques et medicales</json:string>
<json:string>3 - sciences biologiques fondamentales et appliquees. psychologie</json:string>
<json:string>4 - psychologie. psychophysiologie</json:string>
</inist>
</categories>
<publicationDate>1995</publicationDate>
<copyrightDate>1995</copyrightDate>
<doi>
<json:string>10.1007/BF00115315</json:string>
</doi>
<id>D2A839B1B8B6092128D0F96A4CFDD6C3DE76094A</id>
<score>1</score>
<fulltext>
<json:item>
<extension>pdf</extension>
<original>true</original>
<mimetype>application/pdf</mimetype>
<uri>https://api.istex.fr/document/D2A839B1B8B6092128D0F96A4CFDD6C3DE76094A/fulltext/pdf</uri>
</json:item>
<json:item>
<extension>zip</extension>
<original>false</original>
<mimetype>application/zip</mimetype>
<uri>https://api.istex.fr/document/D2A839B1B8B6092128D0F96A4CFDD6C3DE76094A/fulltext/zip</uri>
</json:item>
<istex:fulltextTEI uri="https://api.istex.fr/document/D2A839B1B8B6092128D0F96A4CFDD6C3DE76094A/fulltext/tei">
<teiHeader>
<fileDesc>
<titleStmt>
<title level="a" type="main" xml:lang="en">The forest issue in post-UNCED international negotiations: conflicting interests and fora for reconciliation</title>
<respStmt>
<resp>Références bibliographiques récupérées via GROBID</resp>
<name resp="ISTEX-API">ISTEX-API (INIST-CNRS)</name>
</respStmt>
</titleStmt>
<publicationStmt>
<authority>ISTEX</authority>
<publisher scheme="https://publisher-list.data.istex.fr">Kluwer Academic Publishers</publisher>
<pubPlace>Dordrecht</pubPlace>
<availability>
<licence>
<p>Chapman & Hall, 1995</p>
</licence>
<p scheme="https://loaded-corpus.data.istex.fr/ark:/67375/XBH-3XSW68JL-F">springer</p>
</availability>
<date>1994-04-20</date>
</publicationStmt>
<notesStmt>
<note type="research-article" scheme="https://content-type.data.istex.fr/ark:/67375/XTP-1JC4F85T-7">research-article</note>
<note type="journal" scheme="https://publication-type.data.istex.fr/ark:/67375/JMC-0GLKJH51-B">journal</note>
<note>Papers</note>
</notesStmt>
<sourceDesc>
<biblStruct type="inbook">
<analytic>
<title level="a" type="main" xml:lang="en">The forest issue in post-UNCED international negotiations: conflicting interests and fora for reconciliation</title>
<author xml:id="author-0000">
<persName>
<forename type="first">G.</forename>
<surname>Rosendal</surname>
</persName>
<affiliation>The Fridtjof Nansen Institute, PO Box 326, N-1324, Lysaker, Norway</affiliation>
</author>
<idno type="istex">D2A839B1B8B6092128D0F96A4CFDD6C3DE76094A</idno>
<idno type="ark">ark:/67375/1BB-K79G2TXG-8</idno>
<idno type="DOI">10.1007/BF00115315</idno>
<idno type="article-id">BF00115315</idno>
<idno type="article-id">Art5</idno>
</analytic>
<monogr>
<title level="j">Biodiversity & Conservation</title>
<title level="j" type="abbrev">Biodivers Conserv</title>
<idno type="pISSN">0960-3115</idno>
<idno type="eISSN">1572-9710</idno>
<idno type="journal-ID">true</idno>
<idno type="issue-article-count">7</idno>
<idno type="volume-issue-count">9</idno>
<imprint>
<publisher>Kluwer Academic Publishers</publisher>
<pubPlace>Dordrecht</pubPlace>
<date type="published" when="1995-02-01"></date>
<biblScope unit="volume">4</biblScope>
<biblScope unit="issue">1</biblScope>
<biblScope unit="page" from="91">91</biblScope>
<biblScope unit="page" to="107">107</biblScope>
</imprint>
</monogr>
</biblStruct>
</sourceDesc>
</fileDesc>
<profileDesc>
<creation>
<date>1994-04-20</date>
</creation>
<langUsage>
<language ident="en">en</language>
</langUsage>
<abstract xml:lang="en">
<p>Abstract: The article is concerned with the international deliberations for a follow-up mechanism of the UNCED Statement of Forest Principles. The forest issue is complicated by the different scientific approaches to the deforestation problem, as represented by climate change and biodiversity respectively. From the former perspective, reforestation may seem an adequate remedy to solve the problem, while from the latter, biodiversity, much more weight must be put on conservation and sustainable utilization. An additional complication is presented by the political divide between developing and industrialized countries concerning the approach to the problem of deforestation. The focus of the article is on the current three main international arenas in which the issue is being discussed: (i) addressing the forest issue within the framework of the Convention on Biological Diversity, (ii) enlarging the scope of the International Agreement on Tropical Timber (ITTA) to include all types of forests, and (iii) pursuing the forest issue in a World Commission on Forests and Sustainable Development. The feasibility of achieving agreement and effective implementation within the framework of the various options is the focal point of the discussion.</p>
</abstract>
<textClass>
<keywords scheme="Journal Subject">
<list>
<head>Life Sciences</head>
<item>
<term>Evolutionary Biology</term>
</item>
<item>
<term>Tree Biology</term>
</item>
<item>
<term>Plant Sciences</term>
</item>
</list>
</keywords>
</textClass>
</profileDesc>
<revisionDesc>
<change when="1994-04-20">Created</change>
<change when="1995-02-01">Published</change>
<change xml:id="refBibs-istex" who="#ISTEX-API" when="2017-10-4">References added</change>
</revisionDesc>
</teiHeader>
</istex:fulltextTEI>
<json:item>
<extension>txt</extension>
<original>false</original>
<mimetype>text/plain</mimetype>
<uri>https://api.istex.fr/document/D2A839B1B8B6092128D0F96A4CFDD6C3DE76094A/fulltext/txt</uri>
</json:item>
</fulltext>
<metadata>
<istex:metadataXml wicri:clean="Springer, Publisher found" wicri:toSee="no header">
<istex:xmlDeclaration>version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"</istex:xmlDeclaration>
<istex:docType PUBLIC="-//Springer-Verlag//DTD A++ V2.4//EN" URI="http://devel.springer.de/A++/V2.4/DTD/A++V2.4.dtd" name="istex:docType"></istex:docType>
<istex:document>
<Publisher>
<PublisherInfo>
<PublisherName>Kluwer Academic Publishers</PublisherName>
<PublisherLocation>Dordrecht</PublisherLocation>
</PublisherInfo>
<Journal>
<JournalInfo JournalProductType="ArchiveJournal" NumberingStyle="Unnumbered">
<JournalID>10531</JournalID>
<JournalPrintISSN>0960-3115</JournalPrintISSN>
<JournalElectronicISSN>1572-9710</JournalElectronicISSN>
<JournalTitle>Biodiversity & Conservation</JournalTitle>
<JournalAbbreviatedTitle>Biodivers Conserv</JournalAbbreviatedTitle>
<JournalSubjectGroup>
<JournalSubject Type="Primary">Life Sciences</JournalSubject>
<JournalSubject Type="Secondary">Evolutionary Biology</JournalSubject>
<JournalSubject Type="Secondary">Tree Biology</JournalSubject>
<JournalSubject Type="Secondary">Plant Sciences</JournalSubject>
</JournalSubjectGroup>
</JournalInfo>
<Volume>
<VolumeInfo VolumeType="Regular" TocLevels="0">
<VolumeIDStart>4</VolumeIDStart>
<VolumeIDEnd>4</VolumeIDEnd>
<VolumeIssueCount>9</VolumeIssueCount>
</VolumeInfo>
<Issue IssueType="Regular">
<IssueInfo TocLevels="0">
<IssueIDStart>1</IssueIDStart>
<IssueIDEnd>1</IssueIDEnd>
<IssueArticleCount>7</IssueArticleCount>
<IssueHistory>
<CoverDate>
<Year>1995</Year>
<Month>2</Month>
</CoverDate>
</IssueHistory>
<IssueCopyright>
<CopyrightHolderName>Chapman & Hall</CopyrightHolderName>
<CopyrightYear>1995</CopyrightYear>
</IssueCopyright>
</IssueInfo>
<Article ID="Art5">
<ArticleInfo Language="En" ArticleType="OriginalPaper" NumberingStyle="Unnumbered" TocLevels="0" ContainsESM="No">
<ArticleID>BF00115315</ArticleID>
<ArticleDOI>10.1007/BF00115315</ArticleDOI>
<ArticleSequenceNumber>5</ArticleSequenceNumber>
<ArticleTitle Language="En">The forest issue in post-UNCED international negotiations: conflicting interests and fora for reconciliation</ArticleTitle>
<ArticleCategory>Papers</ArticleCategory>
<ArticleFirstPage>91</ArticleFirstPage>
<ArticleLastPage>107</ArticleLastPage>
<ArticleHistory>
<RegistrationDate>
<Year>2004</Year>
<Month>5</Month>
<Day>13</Day>
</RegistrationDate>
<Received>
<Year>1994</Year>
<Month>4</Month>
<Day>20</Day>
</Received>
<Accepted>
<Year>1994</Year>
<Month>8</Month>
<Day>9</Day>
</Accepted>
</ArticleHistory>
<ArticleCopyright>
<CopyrightHolderName>Chapman & Hall</CopyrightHolderName>
<CopyrightYear>1995</CopyrightYear>
</ArticleCopyright>
<ArticleGrants Type="Regular">
<MetadataGrant Grant="OpenAccess"></MetadataGrant>
<AbstractGrant Grant="OpenAccess"></AbstractGrant>
<BodyPDFGrant Grant="Restricted"></BodyPDFGrant>
<BodyHTMLGrant Grant="Restricted"></BodyHTMLGrant>
<BibliographyGrant Grant="Restricted"></BibliographyGrant>
<ESMGrant Grant="Restricted"></ESMGrant>
</ArticleGrants>
<ArticleContext>
<JournalID>10531</JournalID>
<VolumeIDStart>4</VolumeIDStart>
<VolumeIDEnd>4</VolumeIDEnd>
<IssueIDStart>1</IssueIDStart>
<IssueIDEnd>1</IssueIDEnd>
</ArticleContext>
</ArticleInfo>
<ArticleHeader>
<AuthorGroup>
<Author AffiliationIDS="Aff1">
<AuthorName DisplayOrder="Western">
<GivenName>G.</GivenName>
<GivenName>Kristin</GivenName>
<FamilyName>Rosendal</FamilyName>
</AuthorName>
</Author>
<Affiliation ID="Aff1">
<OrgName>The Fridtjof Nansen Institute</OrgName>
<OrgAddress>
<Postbox>PO Box 326</Postbox>
<Postcode>N-1324</Postcode>
<City>Lysaker</City>
<Country>Norway</Country>
</OrgAddress>
</Affiliation>
</AuthorGroup>
<Abstract ID="Abs1" Language="En">
<Heading>Abstract</Heading>
<Para>The article is concerned with the international deliberations for a follow-up mechanism of the UNCED Statement of Forest Principles. The forest issue is complicated by the different scientific approaches to the deforestation problem, as represented by climate change and biodiversity respectively. From the former perspective, reforestation may seem an adequate remedy to solve the problem, while from the latter, biodiversity, much more weight must be put on conservation and sustainable utilization. An additional complication is presented by the political divide between developing and industrialized countries concerning the approach to the problem of deforestation. The focus of the article is on the current three main international arenas in which the issue is being discussed: (i) addressing the forest issue within the framework of the Convention on Biological Diversity, (ii) enlarging the scope of the International Agreement on Tropical Timber (ITTA) to include all types of forests, and (iii) pursuing the forest issue in a World Commission on Forests and Sustainable Development. The feasibility of achieving agreement and effective implementation within the framework of the various options is the focal point of the discussion.</Para>
</Abstract>
<KeywordGroup Language="En">
<Heading>Key words</Heading>
<Keyword>forest management</Keyword>
<Keyword>biodiversity conservation</Keyword>
<Keyword>international negotiations</Keyword>
<Keyword>UNCED</Keyword>
<Keyword>ITTO</Keyword>
</KeywordGroup>
<ArticleNote Type="Misc">
<SimplePara>This paper is a condensed and updated version of the FNI report:
<Emphasis Type="Italic">The Quest for a Global Forest Strategy: Barking up the Wrong Tree?</Emphasis>
(Rosendal, 1993). Parts of the material were presented at the International Symposium on Management of Rain Forest in Asia, organized in Norway in March 1994, by the University of Oslo.</SimplePara>
</ArticleNote>
</ArticleHeader>
<NoBody></NoBody>
</Article>
</Issue>
</Volume>
</Journal>
</Publisher>
</istex:document>
</istex:metadataXml>
<mods version="3.6">
<titleInfo lang="en">
<title>The forest issue in post-UNCED international negotiations: conflicting interests and fora for reconciliation</title>
</titleInfo>
<titleInfo type="alternative" contentType="CDATA" lang="en">
<title>The forest issue in post-UNCED international negotiations: conflicting interests and fora for reconciliation</title>
</titleInfo>
<name type="personal">
<namePart type="given">G.</namePart>
<namePart type="given">Kristin</namePart>
<namePart type="family">Rosendal</namePart>
<affiliation>The Fridtjof Nansen Institute, PO Box 326, N-1324, Lysaker, Norway</affiliation>
<role>
<roleTerm type="text">author</roleTerm>
</role>
</name>
<typeOfResource>text</typeOfResource>
<genre type="research-article" displayLabel="OriginalPaper" authority="ISTEX" authorityURI="https://content-type.data.istex.fr" valueURI="https://content-type.data.istex.fr/ark:/67375/XTP-1JC4F85T-7">research-article</genre>
<originInfo>
<publisher>Kluwer Academic Publishers</publisher>
<place>
<placeTerm type="text">Dordrecht</placeTerm>
</place>
<dateCreated encoding="w3cdtf">1994-04-20</dateCreated>
<dateIssued encoding="w3cdtf">1995-02-01</dateIssued>
<dateIssued encoding="w3cdtf">1995</dateIssued>
<copyrightDate encoding="w3cdtf">1995</copyrightDate>
</originInfo>
<language>
<languageTerm type="code" authority="rfc3066">en</languageTerm>
<languageTerm type="code" authority="iso639-2b">eng</languageTerm>
</language>
<abstract lang="en">Abstract: The article is concerned with the international deliberations for a follow-up mechanism of the UNCED Statement of Forest Principles. The forest issue is complicated by the different scientific approaches to the deforestation problem, as represented by climate change and biodiversity respectively. From the former perspective, reforestation may seem an adequate remedy to solve the problem, while from the latter, biodiversity, much more weight must be put on conservation and sustainable utilization. An additional complication is presented by the political divide between developing and industrialized countries concerning the approach to the problem of deforestation. The focus of the article is on the current three main international arenas in which the issue is being discussed: (i) addressing the forest issue within the framework of the Convention on Biological Diversity, (ii) enlarging the scope of the International Agreement on Tropical Timber (ITTA) to include all types of forests, and (iii) pursuing the forest issue in a World Commission on Forests and Sustainable Development. The feasibility of achieving agreement and effective implementation within the framework of the various options is the focal point of the discussion.</abstract>
<note>Papers</note>
<relatedItem type="host">
<titleInfo>
<title>Biodiversity & Conservation</title>
</titleInfo>
<titleInfo type="abbreviated">
<title>Biodivers Conserv</title>
</titleInfo>
<genre type="journal" displayLabel="Archive Journal" authority="ISTEX" valueURI="https://publication-type.data.istex.fr/ark:/67375/JMC-0GLKJH51-B">journal</genre>
<originInfo>
<publisher>Springer</publisher>
<dateIssued encoding="w3cdtf">1995-02-01</dateIssued>
<copyrightDate encoding="w3cdtf">1995</copyrightDate>
</originInfo>
<subject>
<genre>Life Sciences</genre>
<topic>Evolutionary Biology</topic>
<topic>Tree Biology</topic>
<topic>Plant Sciences</topic>
</subject>
<identifier type="ISSN">0960-3115</identifier>
<identifier type="eISSN">1572-9710</identifier>
<identifier type="JournalID">10531</identifier>
<identifier type="IssueArticleCount">7</identifier>
<identifier type="VolumeIssueCount">9</identifier>
<part>
<date>1995</date>
<detail type="volume">
<number>4</number>
<caption>vol.</caption>
</detail>
<detail type="issue">
<number>1</number>
<caption>no.</caption>
</detail>
<extent unit="pages">
<start>91</start>
<end>107</end>
</extent>
</part>
<recordInfo>
<recordOrigin>Chapman & Hall, 1995</recordOrigin>
</recordInfo>
</relatedItem>
<identifier type="istex">D2A839B1B8B6092128D0F96A4CFDD6C3DE76094A</identifier>
<identifier type="ark">ark:/67375/1BB-K79G2TXG-8</identifier>
<identifier type="DOI">10.1007/BF00115315</identifier>
<identifier type="ArticleID">BF00115315</identifier>
<identifier type="ArticleID">Art5</identifier>
<accessCondition type="use and reproduction" contentType="copyright">Chapman & Hall, 1995</accessCondition>
<recordInfo>
<recordContentSource authority="ISTEX" authorityURI="https://loaded-corpus.data.istex.fr" valueURI="https://loaded-corpus.data.istex.fr/ark:/67375/XBH-3XSW68JL-F">springer</recordContentSource>
<recordOrigin>Chapman & Hall, 1995</recordOrigin>
</recordInfo>
</mods>
<json:item>
<extension>json</extension>
<original>false</original>
<mimetype>application/json</mimetype>
<uri>https://api.istex.fr/document/D2A839B1B8B6092128D0F96A4CFDD6C3DE76094A/metadata/json</uri>
</json:item>
</metadata>
<serie></serie>
</istex>
</record>

Pour manipuler ce document sous Unix (Dilib)

EXPLOR_STEP=$WICRI_ROOT/Wicri/Santé/explor/EdenteV2/Data/Istex/Corpus
HfdSelect -h $EXPLOR_STEP/biblio.hfd -nk 006868 | SxmlIndent | more

Ou

HfdSelect -h $EXPLOR_AREA/Data/Istex/Corpus/biblio.hfd -nk 006868 | SxmlIndent | more

Pour mettre un lien sur cette page dans le réseau Wicri

{{Explor lien
   |wiki=    Wicri/Santé
   |area=    EdenteV2
   |flux=    Istex
   |étape=   Corpus
   |type=    RBID
   |clé=     ISTEX:D2A839B1B8B6092128D0F96A4CFDD6C3DE76094A
   |texte=   The forest issue in post-UNCED international negotiations: conflicting interests and fora for reconciliation
}}

Wicri

This area was generated with Dilib version V0.6.32.
Data generation: Thu Nov 30 15:26:48 2017. Site generation: Tue Mar 8 16:36:20 2022