Long‐Term Follow‐Up of CeraOne™ Single‐Implant Restorations: An 18‐Year Follow‐Up Study Based on a Prospective Patient Cohort
Identifieur interne : 006774 ( Istex/Corpus ); précédent : 006773; suivant : 006775Long‐Term Follow‐Up of CeraOne™ Single‐Implant Restorations: An 18‐Year Follow‐Up Study Based on a Prospective Patient Cohort
Auteurs : Sibel Bergenblock ; Bernt Andersson ; Björn Fürst ; Torsten JemtSource :
- Clinical Implant Dentistry and Related Research [ 1523-0899 ] ; 2012-08.
English descriptors
- KwdEn :
- Abutment, Abutment screws, Adjacent teeth, Anterior maxilla, Average time, Baseline, Bone level, Bone levels, Bone loss, Ceraone, Ceraone abutments, Ceraone restorations, Ceraone technique, Clin, Clin implant dent relat, Clin periodontol, Clinical examination, Clinical implant dentistry, Clinical performance, Common reason, Conical implants, Crown margins, Crown placement, Crown replacement, Crown restoration, Crown restorations, Dent, Development period, Different periods, Distal side, Health service, Implant, Implant crown, Implant crown infraposition, Implant crowns, Implant failures, Implant head, Implant patients, Implant placement, Implant restorations, Implant sites, Implant treatment, Infraposition, Jemt, Life table, Marginal bone levels, Marginal bone loss, Maxillofac, Nobel biocare, Oral maxillofac implants, Original crown restorations, Original crowns, Original restorations, Osseointegrated, Osseointegrated implants, Partial dentures, Pioneer group, Pocket depths, Present study, Prospective multicenter study, Prospective part, Prospective study, Prosthetic dentistry, Prosthodont, Radiographic examination, Retrospective study, Second stage surgery, Sibel bergenblock, Single crowns, Single implant restorations, Single implants, Specialist clinic, Standard implants, Success criteria, System implants, Tooth extraction, Various signs, Vertical distance.
- Teeft :
- Abutment, Abutment screws, Adjacent teeth, Anterior maxilla, Average time, Baseline, Bone level, Bone levels, Bone loss, Ceraone, Ceraone abutments, Ceraone restorations, Ceraone technique, Clin, Clin implant dent relat, Clin periodontol, Clinical examination, Clinical implant dentistry, Clinical performance, Common reason, Conical implants, Crown margins, Crown placement, Crown replacement, Crown restoration, Crown restorations, Dent, Development period, Different periods, Distal side, Health service, Implant, Implant crown, Implant crown infraposition, Implant crowns, Implant failures, Implant head, Implant patients, Implant placement, Implant restorations, Implant sites, Implant treatment, Infraposition, Jemt, Life table, Marginal bone levels, Marginal bone loss, Maxillofac, Nobel biocare, Oral maxillofac implants, Original crown restorations, Original crowns, Original restorations, Osseointegrated, Osseointegrated implants, Partial dentures, Pioneer group, Pocket depths, Present study, Prospective multicenter study, Prospective part, Prospective study, Prosthetic dentistry, Prosthodont, Radiographic examination, Retrospective study, Second stage surgery, Sibel bergenblock, Single crowns, Single implant restorations, Single implants, Specialist clinic, Standard implants, Success criteria, System implants, Tooth extraction, Various signs, Vertical distance.
Abstract
Background: Knowledge on long‐term clinical performance of more than 5 years on the single‐implant CeraOne™ (Nobel Biocare AB, Gothenburg, Sweden) concept is limited.
Url:
DOI: 10.1111/j.1708-8208.2010.00290.x
Links to Exploration step
ISTEX:D06A62A8E43235482B9B61B34DA4280755626455Le document en format XML
<record><TEI wicri:istexFullTextTei="biblStruct"><teiHeader><fileDesc><titleStmt><title xml:lang="en">Long‐Term Follow‐Up of CeraOne™ Single‐Implant Restorations: An 18‐Year Follow‐Up Study Based on a Prospective Patient Cohort</title><author><name sortKey="Bergenblock, Sibel" sort="Bergenblock, Sibel" uniqKey="Bergenblock S" first="Sibel" last="Bergenblock">Sibel Bergenblock</name><affiliation><mods:affiliation>Prosthodontist, Specialist Clinic of Prosthetic Dentistry, Public Dental Health Service, Mölndal Hospital, Västra Götaland, Sweden;</mods:affiliation></affiliation><affiliation><mods:affiliation>E-mail: sibel.bergenblock@vgregion.se</mods:affiliation></affiliation></author><author><name sortKey="Andersson, Bernt" sort="Andersson, Bernt" uniqKey="Andersson B" first="Bernt" last="Andersson">Bernt Andersson</name><affiliation><mods:affiliation>Prosthodontist, Specialist Clinic of Prosthetic Dentistry, Public Dental Health Service, Mölndal Hospital, Västra Götaland, Sweden;</mods:affiliation></affiliation></author><author><name sortKey="Furst, Bjorn" sort="Furst, Bjorn" uniqKey="Furst B" first="Björn" last="Fürst">Björn Fürst</name><affiliation><mods:affiliation>Prosthodontist, Specialist Clinic of Prosthetic Dentistry, Public Dental Health Service, Mölndal Hospital, Västra Götaland, Sweden;</mods:affiliation></affiliation><affiliation><mods:affiliation>chairman, Specialist Clinic of Prosthetic Dentistry, Public Dental Health Service, Mölndal Hospital, Västra Götaland, Sweden;</mods:affiliation></affiliation></author><author><name sortKey="Jemt, Torsten" sort="Jemt, Torsten" uniqKey="Jemt T" first="Torsten" last="Jemt">Torsten Jemt</name><affiliation><mods:affiliation>professor, Department of Prosthetic Dentistry/Dental Material Science, Institute of Odontology, Sahlgrenska Academy at Göteborg University, Göteborg, Sweden;</mods:affiliation></affiliation><affiliation><mods:affiliation>prosthodontist, Brånemark Clinic, Public Dental Health Service, Västra Götaland, Sweden</mods:affiliation></affiliation></author></titleStmt><publicationStmt><idno type="wicri:source">ISTEX</idno><idno type="RBID">ISTEX:D06A62A8E43235482B9B61B34DA4280755626455</idno><date when="2012" year="2012">2012</date><idno type="doi">10.1111/j.1708-8208.2010.00290.x</idno><idno type="url">https://api.istex.fr/document/D06A62A8E43235482B9B61B34DA4280755626455/fulltext/pdf</idno><idno type="wicri:Area/Istex/Corpus">006774</idno><idno type="wicri:explorRef" wicri:stream="Istex" wicri:step="Corpus" wicri:corpus="ISTEX">006774</idno></publicationStmt><sourceDesc><biblStruct><analytic><title level="a" type="main">Long‐Term Follow‐Up of CeraOne™ Single‐Implant Restorations: An 18‐Year Follow‐Up Study Based on a Prospective Patient Cohort</title><author><name sortKey="Bergenblock, Sibel" sort="Bergenblock, Sibel" uniqKey="Bergenblock S" first="Sibel" last="Bergenblock">Sibel Bergenblock</name><affiliation><mods:affiliation>Prosthodontist, Specialist Clinic of Prosthetic Dentistry, Public Dental Health Service, Mölndal Hospital, Västra Götaland, Sweden;</mods:affiliation></affiliation><affiliation><mods:affiliation>E-mail: sibel.bergenblock@vgregion.se</mods:affiliation></affiliation></author><author><name sortKey="Andersson, Bernt" sort="Andersson, Bernt" uniqKey="Andersson B" first="Bernt" last="Andersson">Bernt Andersson</name><affiliation><mods:affiliation>Prosthodontist, Specialist Clinic of Prosthetic Dentistry, Public Dental Health Service, Mölndal Hospital, Västra Götaland, Sweden;</mods:affiliation></affiliation></author><author><name sortKey="Furst, Bjorn" sort="Furst, Bjorn" uniqKey="Furst B" first="Björn" last="Fürst">Björn Fürst</name><affiliation><mods:affiliation>Prosthodontist, Specialist Clinic of Prosthetic Dentistry, Public Dental Health Service, Mölndal Hospital, Västra Götaland, Sweden;</mods:affiliation></affiliation><affiliation><mods:affiliation>chairman, Specialist Clinic of Prosthetic Dentistry, Public Dental Health Service, Mölndal Hospital, Västra Götaland, Sweden;</mods:affiliation></affiliation></author><author><name sortKey="Jemt, Torsten" sort="Jemt, Torsten" uniqKey="Jemt T" first="Torsten" last="Jemt">Torsten Jemt</name><affiliation><mods:affiliation>professor, Department of Prosthetic Dentistry/Dental Material Science, Institute of Odontology, Sahlgrenska Academy at Göteborg University, Göteborg, Sweden;</mods:affiliation></affiliation><affiliation><mods:affiliation>prosthodontist, Brånemark Clinic, Public Dental Health Service, Västra Götaland, Sweden</mods:affiliation></affiliation></author></analytic><monogr></monogr><series><title level="j" type="main">Clinical Implant Dentistry and Related Research</title><title level="j" type="alt">CLINICAL IMPLANT DENTISTRY RELATED RESEARCH</title><idno type="ISSN">1523-0899</idno><idno type="eISSN">1708-8208</idno><imprint><biblScope unit="vol">14</biblScope><biblScope unit="issue">4</biblScope><biblScope unit="page" from="471">471</biblScope><biblScope unit="page" to="479">479</biblScope><biblScope unit="page-count">9</biblScope><publisher>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</publisher><pubPlace>Oxford, UK</pubPlace><date type="published" when="2012-08">2012-08</date></imprint><idno type="ISSN">1523-0899</idno></series></biblStruct></sourceDesc><seriesStmt><idno type="ISSN">1523-0899</idno></seriesStmt></fileDesc><profileDesc><textClass><keywords scheme="KwdEn" xml:lang="en"><term>Abutment</term><term>Abutment screws</term><term>Adjacent teeth</term><term>Anterior maxilla</term><term>Average time</term><term>Baseline</term><term>Bone level</term><term>Bone levels</term><term>Bone loss</term><term>Ceraone</term><term>Ceraone abutments</term><term>Ceraone restorations</term><term>Ceraone technique</term><term>Clin</term><term>Clin implant dent relat</term><term>Clin periodontol</term><term>Clinical examination</term><term>Clinical implant dentistry</term><term>Clinical performance</term><term>Common reason</term><term>Conical implants</term><term>Crown margins</term><term>Crown placement</term><term>Crown replacement</term><term>Crown restoration</term><term>Crown restorations</term><term>Dent</term><term>Development period</term><term>Different periods</term><term>Distal side</term><term>Health service</term><term>Implant</term><term>Implant crown</term><term>Implant crown infraposition</term><term>Implant crowns</term><term>Implant failures</term><term>Implant head</term><term>Implant patients</term><term>Implant placement</term><term>Implant restorations</term><term>Implant sites</term><term>Implant treatment</term><term>Infraposition</term><term>Jemt</term><term>Life table</term><term>Marginal bone levels</term><term>Marginal bone loss</term><term>Maxillofac</term><term>Nobel biocare</term><term>Oral maxillofac implants</term><term>Original crown restorations</term><term>Original crowns</term><term>Original restorations</term><term>Osseointegrated</term><term>Osseointegrated implants</term><term>Partial dentures</term><term>Pioneer group</term><term>Pocket depths</term><term>Present study</term><term>Prospective multicenter study</term><term>Prospective part</term><term>Prospective study</term><term>Prosthetic dentistry</term><term>Prosthodont</term><term>Radiographic examination</term><term>Retrospective study</term><term>Second stage surgery</term><term>Sibel bergenblock</term><term>Single crowns</term><term>Single implant restorations</term><term>Single implants</term><term>Specialist clinic</term><term>Standard implants</term><term>Success criteria</term><term>System implants</term><term>Tooth extraction</term><term>Various signs</term><term>Vertical distance</term></keywords><keywords scheme="Teeft" xml:lang="en"><term>Abutment</term><term>Abutment screws</term><term>Adjacent teeth</term><term>Anterior maxilla</term><term>Average time</term><term>Baseline</term><term>Bone level</term><term>Bone levels</term><term>Bone loss</term><term>Ceraone</term><term>Ceraone abutments</term><term>Ceraone restorations</term><term>Ceraone technique</term><term>Clin</term><term>Clin implant dent relat</term><term>Clin periodontol</term><term>Clinical examination</term><term>Clinical implant dentistry</term><term>Clinical performance</term><term>Common reason</term><term>Conical implants</term><term>Crown margins</term><term>Crown placement</term><term>Crown replacement</term><term>Crown restoration</term><term>Crown restorations</term><term>Dent</term><term>Development period</term><term>Different periods</term><term>Distal side</term><term>Health service</term><term>Implant</term><term>Implant crown</term><term>Implant crown infraposition</term><term>Implant crowns</term><term>Implant failures</term><term>Implant head</term><term>Implant patients</term><term>Implant placement</term><term>Implant restorations</term><term>Implant sites</term><term>Implant treatment</term><term>Infraposition</term><term>Jemt</term><term>Life table</term><term>Marginal bone levels</term><term>Marginal bone loss</term><term>Maxillofac</term><term>Nobel biocare</term><term>Oral maxillofac implants</term><term>Original crown restorations</term><term>Original crowns</term><term>Original restorations</term><term>Osseointegrated</term><term>Osseointegrated implants</term><term>Partial dentures</term><term>Pioneer group</term><term>Pocket depths</term><term>Present study</term><term>Prospective multicenter study</term><term>Prospective part</term><term>Prospective study</term><term>Prosthetic dentistry</term><term>Prosthodont</term><term>Radiographic examination</term><term>Retrospective study</term><term>Second stage surgery</term><term>Sibel bergenblock</term><term>Single crowns</term><term>Single implant restorations</term><term>Single implants</term><term>Specialist clinic</term><term>Standard implants</term><term>Success criteria</term><term>System implants</term><term>Tooth extraction</term><term>Various signs</term><term>Vertical distance</term></keywords></textClass></profileDesc></teiHeader><front><div type="abstract">Background: Knowledge on long‐term clinical performance of more than 5 years on the single‐implant CeraOne™ (Nobel Biocare AB, Gothenburg, Sweden) concept is limited.</div></front></TEI><istex><corpusName>wiley</corpusName><keywords><teeft><json:string>implant</json:string><json:string>abutment</json:string><json:string>ceraone</json:string><json:string>jemt</json:string><json:string>bone loss</json:string><json:string>clin</json:string><json:string>prosthodont</json:string><json:string>single implants</json:string><json:string>original crowns</json:string><json:string>maxillofac</json:string><json:string>infraposition</json:string><json:string>adjacent teeth</json:string><json:string>bone levels</json:string><json:string>osseointegrated</json:string><json:string>crown restorations</json:string><json:string>oral maxillofac implants</json:string><json:string>prospective study</json:string><json:string>nobel biocare</json:string><json:string>implant sites</json:string><json:string>osseointegrated implants</json:string><json:string>present study</json:string><json:string>baseline</json:string><json:string>implant failures</json:string><json:string>original restorations</json:string><json:string>ceraone restorations</json:string><json:string>clinical implant dentistry</json:string><json:string>clin implant dent relat</json:string><json:string>single crowns</json:string><json:string>second stage surgery</json:string><json:string>conical implants</json:string><json:string>health service</json:string><json:string>implant crown</json:string><json:string>implant placement</json:string><json:string>implant treatment</json:string><json:string>abutment screws</json:string><json:string>ceraone abutments</json:string><json:string>life table</json:string><json:string>clin periodontol</json:string><json:string>implant head</json:string><json:string>marginal bone loss</json:string><json:string>clinical examination</json:string><json:string>standard implants</json:string><json:string>original crown restorations</json:string><json:string>vertical distance</json:string><json:string>crown placement</json:string><json:string>clinical performance</json:string><json:string>single implant restorations</json:string><json:string>dent</json:string><json:string>bone level</json:string><json:string>pocket depths</json:string><json:string>radiographic examination</json:string><json:string>success criteria</json:string><json:string>prospective part</json:string><json:string>sibel bergenblock</json:string><json:string>crown restoration</json:string><json:string>system implants</json:string><json:string>tooth extraction</json:string><json:string>implant restorations</json:string><json:string>marginal bone levels</json:string><json:string>ceraone technique</json:string><json:string>crown margins</json:string><json:string>development period</json:string><json:string>implant crowns</json:string><json:string>different periods</json:string><json:string>pioneer group</json:string><json:string>partial dentures</json:string><json:string>distal side</json:string><json:string>prosthetic dentistry</json:string><json:string>specialist clinic</json:string><json:string>implant crown infraposition</json:string><json:string>prospective multicenter study</json:string><json:string>various signs</json:string><json:string>crown replacement</json:string><json:string>anterior maxilla</json:string><json:string>common reason</json:string><json:string>implant patients</json:string><json:string>average time</json:string><json:string>retrospective study</json:string></teeft></keywords><author><json:item><name>Sibel Bergenblock DDS</name><affiliations><json:string>Prosthodontist, Specialist Clinic of Prosthetic Dentistry, Public Dental Health Service, Mölndal Hospital, Västra Götaland, Sweden;</json:string><json:string>E-mail: sibel.bergenblock@vgregion.se</json:string></affiliations></json:item><json:item><name>Bernt Andersson DDS, Odont Dr/PhD</name><affiliations><json:string>Prosthodontist, Specialist Clinic of Prosthetic Dentistry, Public Dental Health Service, Mölndal Hospital, Västra Götaland, Sweden;</json:string></affiliations></json:item><json:item><name>Björn Fürst DDS</name><affiliations><json:string>Prosthodontist, Specialist Clinic of Prosthetic Dentistry, Public Dental Health Service, Mölndal Hospital, Västra Götaland, Sweden;</json:string><json:string>chairman, Specialist Clinic of Prosthetic Dentistry, Public Dental Health Service, Mölndal Hospital, Västra Götaland, Sweden;</json:string></affiliations></json:item><json:item><name>Torsten Jemt DDS, Odont Dr/PhD</name><affiliations><json:string>professor, Department of Prosthetic Dentistry/Dental Material Science, Institute of Odontology, Sahlgrenska Academy at Göteborg University, Göteborg, Sweden;</json:string><json:string>prosthodontist, Brånemark Clinic, Public Dental Health Service, Västra Götaland, Sweden</json:string></affiliations></json:item></author><subject><json:item><lang><json:string>eng</json:string></lang><value>bone loss</value></json:item><json:item><lang><json:string>eng</json:string></lang><value>ceramic crowns</value></json:item><json:item><lang><json:string>eng</json:string></lang><value>complications</value></json:item><json:item><lang><json:string>eng</json:string></lang><value>dental implants</value></json:item><json:item><lang><json:string>eng</json:string></lang><value>follow‐up</value></json:item><json:item><lang><json:string>eng</json:string></lang><value>infraposition</value></json:item><json:item><lang><json:string>eng</json:string></lang><value>single‐tooth</value></json:item></subject><articleId><json:string>CID290</json:string></articleId><arkIstex>ark:/67375/WNG-WQ5B3TXL-C</arkIstex><language><json:string>eng</json:string></language><originalGenre><json:string>article</json:string></originalGenre><abstract>Background: Knowledge on long‐term clinical performance of more than 5 years on the single‐implant CeraOne™ (Nobel Biocare AB, Gothenburg, Sweden) concept is limited.</abstract><qualityIndicators><score>6.765</score><pdfWordCount>4489</pdfWordCount><pdfCharCount>28437</pdfCharCount><pdfVersion>1.3</pdfVersion><pdfPageCount>9</pdfPageCount><pdfPageSize>585 x 783 pts</pdfPageSize><refBibsNative>true</refBibsNative><abstractWordCount>23</abstractWordCount><abstractCharCount>166</abstractCharCount><keywordCount>7</keywordCount></qualityIndicators><title>Long‐Term Follow‐Up of CeraOne™ Single‐Implant Restorations: An 18‐Year Follow‐Up Study Based on a Prospective Patient Cohort</title><pmid><json:string>20586784</json:string></pmid><genre><json:string>article</json:string></genre><host><title>Clinical Implant Dentistry and Related Research</title><language><json:string>unknown</json:string></language><doi><json:string>10.1111/(ISSN)1708-8208</json:string></doi><issn><json:string>1523-0899</json:string></issn><eissn><json:string>1708-8208</json:string></eissn><publisherId><json:string>CID</json:string></publisherId><volume>14</volume><issue>4</issue><pages><first>471</first><last>479</last><total>9</total></pages><genre><json:string>journal</json:string></genre></host><namedEntities><unitex><date><json:string>2012</json:string><json:string>1980s</json:string></date><geogName></geogName><orgName><json:string>Mölndal Hospital, Västra Götaland, Sweden</json:string><json:string>Related Research, Volume</json:string><json:string>Dentsply Ltd, Konstanz, Germany</json:string><json:string>Department of Prosthetic Dentistry/Dental Material Science, Institute of Odontology, Sahlgrenska Academy</json:string><json:string>Sweden Earlier</json:string><json:string>Göteborg University</json:string></orgName><orgName_funder></orgName_funder><orgName_provider></orgName_provider><persName><json:string>Sibel Bergenblock</json:string><json:string>Trey Division</json:string><json:string>BoP</json:string><json:string>Lost</json:string><json:string>Implants</json:string></persName><placeName><json:string>Gothenburg</json:string><json:string>Sweden</json:string></placeName><ref_url></ref_url><ref_bibl></ref_bibl><bibl></bibl></unitex></namedEntities><ark><json:string>ark:/67375/WNG-WQ5B3TXL-C</json:string></ark><categories><wos><json:string>1 - science</json:string><json:string>2 - dentistry, oral surgery & medicine</json:string></wos><scienceMetrix><json:string>1 - health sciences</json:string><json:string>2 - clinical medicine</json:string><json:string>3 - dentistry</json:string></scienceMetrix><scopus><json:string>1 - Health Sciences</json:string><json:string>2 - Dentistry</json:string><json:string>3 - General Dentistry</json:string><json:string>1 - Health Sciences</json:string><json:string>2 - Dentistry</json:string><json:string>3 - Oral Surgery</json:string></scopus></categories><publicationDate>2012</publicationDate><copyrightDate>2012</copyrightDate><doi><json:string>10.1111/j.1708-8208.2010.00290.x</json:string></doi><id>D06A62A8E43235482B9B61B34DA4280755626455</id><score>1</score><fulltext><json:item><extension>pdf</extension><original>true</original><mimetype>application/pdf</mimetype><uri>https://api.istex.fr/document/D06A62A8E43235482B9B61B34DA4280755626455/fulltext/pdf</uri></json:item><json:item><extension>zip</extension><original>false</original><mimetype>application/zip</mimetype><uri>https://api.istex.fr/document/D06A62A8E43235482B9B61B34DA4280755626455/fulltext/zip</uri></json:item><istex:fulltextTEI uri="https://api.istex.fr/document/D06A62A8E43235482B9B61B34DA4280755626455/fulltext/tei"><teiHeader><fileDesc><titleStmt><title level="a" type="main">Long‐Term Follow‐Up of CeraOne™ Single‐Implant Restorations: An 18‐Year Follow‐Up Study Based on a Prospective Patient Cohort</title></titleStmt><publicationStmt><authority>ISTEX</authority><publisher>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</publisher><pubPlace>Oxford, UK</pubPlace><availability><licence>© 2010 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.</licence></availability><date type="published" when="2012-08"></date></publicationStmt><notesStmt><note type="content-type" subtype="article" source="article" scheme="https://content-type.data.istex.fr/ark:/67375/XTP-6N5SZHKN-D">article</note><note type="publication-type" subtype="journal" scheme="https://publication-type.data.istex.fr/ark:/67375/JMC-0GLKJH51-B">journal</note></notesStmt><sourceDesc><biblStruct type="article"><analytic><title level="a" type="main">Long‐Term Follow‐Up of CeraOne™ Single‐Implant Restorations: An 18‐Year Follow‐Up Study Based on a Prospective Patient Cohort</title><title level="a" type="short">Long‐Term Follow‐Up of CeraOne™ Single‐Implant Restorations</title><author xml:id="author-0000" role="corresp"><persName><forename type="first">Sibel</forename><surname>Bergenblock</surname><roleName type="degree">DDS</roleName></persName><affiliation>Prosthodontist, Specialist Clinic of Prosthetic Dentistry, Public Dental Health Service, Mölndal Hospital, Västra Götaland, Sweden;<address><country key="SE"></country></address></affiliation><affiliation>Dr. Sibel Bergenblock, Specialistkliniken för Oral Protetik, SU/Mölndal, 431 80 Mölndal, Sweden; e‐mail: sibel.bergenblock@vgregion.se</affiliation></author><author xml:id="author-0001"><persName><forename type="first">Bernt</forename><surname>Andersson</surname><roleName type="degree">DDS, Odont Dr/PhD</roleName></persName><affiliation>Prosthodontist, Specialist Clinic of Prosthetic Dentistry, Public Dental Health Service, Mölndal Hospital, Västra Götaland, Sweden;<address><country key="SE"></country></address></affiliation></author><author xml:id="author-0002"><persName><forename type="first">Björn</forename><surname>Fürst</surname><roleName type="degree">DDS</roleName></persName><affiliation>Prosthodontist, Specialist Clinic of Prosthetic Dentistry, Public Dental Health Service, Mölndal Hospital, Västra Götaland, Sweden;<address><country key="SE"></country></address></affiliation><affiliation>chairman, Specialist Clinic of Prosthetic Dentistry, Public Dental Health Service, Mölndal Hospital, Västra Götaland, Sweden;<address><country key="SE"></country></address></affiliation></author><author xml:id="author-0003"><persName><forename type="first">Torsten</forename><surname>Jemt</surname><roleName type="degree">DDS, Odont Dr/PhD</roleName></persName><affiliation>professor, Department of Prosthetic Dentistry/Dental Material Science, Institute of Odontology, Sahlgrenska Academy at Göteborg University, Göteborg, Sweden;<address><country key="SE"></country></address></affiliation><affiliation>prosthodontist, Brånemark Clinic, Public Dental Health Service, Västra Götaland, Sweden<address><country key="SE"></country></address></affiliation></author><idno type="istex">D06A62A8E43235482B9B61B34DA4280755626455</idno><idno type="ark">ark:/67375/WNG-WQ5B3TXL-C</idno><idno type="DOI">10.1111/j.1708-8208.2010.00290.x</idno><idno type="unit">CID290</idno><idno type="toTypesetVersion">file:CID.CID290.pdf</idno></analytic><monogr><title level="j" type="main">Clinical Implant Dentistry and Related Research</title><title level="j" type="alt">CLINICAL IMPLANT DENTISTRY RELATED RESEARCH</title><idno type="pISSN">1523-0899</idno><idno type="eISSN">1708-8208</idno><idno type="book-DOI">10.1111/(ISSN)1708-8208</idno><idno type="book-part-DOI">10.1111/cid.2012.14.issue-4</idno><idno type="product">CID</idno><idno type="publisherDivision">ST</idno><imprint><biblScope unit="vol">14</biblScope><biblScope unit="issue">4</biblScope><biblScope unit="page" from="471">471</biblScope><biblScope unit="page" to="479">479</biblScope><biblScope unit="page-count">9</biblScope><publisher>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</publisher><pubPlace>Oxford, UK</pubPlace><date type="published" when="2012-08"></date></imprint></monogr></biblStruct></sourceDesc></fileDesc><profileDesc><abstract xml:lang="en" style="main"><head>ABSTRACT</head><p><hi rend="bold">Background:</hi> Knowledge on long‐term clinical performance of more than 5 years on the single‐implant CeraOne™ (Nobel Biocare AB, Gothenburg, Sweden) concept is limited.</p><p><hi rend="bold">Purpose:</hi> The aim of this study is to report the long‐term clinical performance of the first CeraOne single‐implant restorations, installed 17 to 19 years ago.</p><p><hi rend="bold">Materials and Methods:</hi> The group comprised 57 patients provided with 65 CeraOne single‐tooth restorations. Sixty‐two all‐ceramic and three metal‐ceramic crowns were cemented between 1989 and 1991. Patients were followed up clinically and with intraoral radiographs at placement, after 1, 5, and between 17 and 19 years after placement.</p><p><hi rend="bold">Results:</hi> Data were available for altogether 48 patients, followed up on an average time of 18 years. Excluding deceased patients (<hi rend="italic">n</hi> = 2) and failed implant patients (<hi rend="italic">n</hi> = 2), only five patients were lost to follow‐up (8.8%). Two implants failed, resulting in an 18‐year implant cumulative success rate (CSR) of 96.8%, and altogether eight original single‐crown restorations were replaced (CSR 83.8%). The most common reason for crown replacement was infra‐position of the implant crown (<hi rend="italic">n</hi> = 3). Many of the remaining original crowns showed various signs of implant crown infraposition at the termination of the study. In general, the soft tissue at the restorations was assessed to be healthy and comparable with the gingiva at the adjacent natural teeth. Bone levels were on an average stable with only few patients exhibiting bone loss of more than 2 mm during 18 years in function.</p><p><hi rend="bold">Conclusion:</hi> This long‐term follow‐up study of single‐implant restorations shows encouraging results with few implant failures and minimal bone loss over an 18‐year period. Original single‐crown restorations were replaced more frequently, because of, for example, implant crown infraposition and veneer fractures. The CeraOne concept proved to be a highly predictable and safe prosthodontic treatment.</p></abstract><textClass><keywords xml:lang="en"><term xml:id="k1">bone loss</term><term xml:id="k2">ceramic crowns</term><term xml:id="k3">complications</term><term xml:id="k4">dental implants</term><term xml:id="k5">follow‐up</term><term xml:id="k6">infraposition</term><term xml:id="k7">single‐tooth</term></keywords><keywords rend="tocHeading1"><term>ARTICLES</term></keywords></textClass><langUsage><language ident="en"></language></langUsage></profileDesc></teiHeader></istex:fulltextTEI><json:item><extension>txt</extension><original>false</original><mimetype>text/plain</mimetype><uri>https://api.istex.fr/document/D06A62A8E43235482B9B61B34DA4280755626455/fulltext/txt</uri></json:item></fulltext><metadata><istex:metadataXml wicri:clean="Wiley, elements deleted: body"><istex:xmlDeclaration>version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" standalone="yes"</istex:xmlDeclaration><istex:document><component version="2.0" type="serialArticle" xml:lang="en"><header><publicationMeta level="product"><publisherInfo><publisherName>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</publisherName><publisherLoc>Oxford, UK</publisherLoc></publisherInfo><doi origin="wiley" registered="yes">10.1111/(ISSN)1708-8208</doi><issn type="print">1523-0899</issn><issn type="electronic">1708-8208</issn><idGroup><id type="product" value="CID"></id><id type="publisherDivision" value="ST"></id></idGroup><titleGroup><title type="main" sort="CLINICAL IMPLANT DENTISTRY RELATED RESEARCH">Clinical Implant Dentistry and Related Research</title></titleGroup></publicationMeta><publicationMeta level="part" position="08104"><doi origin="wiley">10.1111/cid.2012.14.issue-4</doi><numberingGroup><numbering type="journalVolume" number="14">14</numbering><numbering type="journalIssue" number="4">4</numbering></numberingGroup><coverDate startDate="2012-08">August 2012</coverDate></publicationMeta><publicationMeta level="unit" type="article" position="1" status="forIssue"><doi origin="wiley">10.1111/j.1708-8208.2010.00290.x</doi><idGroup><id type="unit" value="CID290"></id></idGroup><countGroup><count type="pageTotal" number="9"></count></countGroup><titleGroup><title type="tocHeading1">ARTICLES</title></titleGroup><copyright>© 2010 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.</copyright><eventGroup><event type="firstOnline" date="2010-06-25"></event><event type="publishedOnlineAcceptedOrEarlyUnpaginated" date="2010-06-25"></event><event type="xmlConverted" agent="Converter:BPG_TO_WML3G version:3.1.6 mode:FullText" date="2012-08-01"></event><event type="publishedOnlineFinalForm" date="2012-08-01"></event><event type="xmlConverted" agent="Converter:WILEY_ML3G_TO_WILEY_ML3GV2 version:3.8.8" date="2014-01-15"></event><event type="xmlConverted" agent="Converter:WML3G_To_WML3G version:4.3.4 mode:FullText" date="2015-02-25"></event></eventGroup><numberingGroup><numbering type="pageFirst" number="471">471</numbering><numbering type="pageLast" number="479">479</numbering></numberingGroup><correspondenceTo>Dr. Sibel Bergenblock, Specialistkliniken för Oral Protetik, SU/Mölndal, 431 80 Mölndal, Sweden; e‐mail: <email>sibel.bergenblock@vgregion.se</email></correspondenceTo><linkGroup><link type="toTypesetVersion" href="file:CID.CID290.pdf"></link></linkGroup></publicationMeta><contentMeta><countGroup><count type="figureTotal" number="1"></count><count type="tableTotal" number="4"></count><count type="formulaTotal" number="0"></count><count type="referenceTotal" number="33"></count><count type="wordTotal" number="0"></count><count type="linksPubMed" number="0"></count><count type="linksCrossRef" number="0"></count></countGroup><titleGroup><title type="main">Long‐Term Follow‐Up of CeraOne™ Single‐Implant Restorations: An 18‐Year Follow‐Up Study Based on a Prospective Patient Cohort</title><title type="shortAuthors">Clinical Implant Dentistry and Related Research, Volume *, Number *, 2010</title><title type="short">Long‐Term Follow‐Up of CeraOne™ Single‐Implant Restorations</title></titleGroup><creators><creator creatorRole="author" xml:id="cr1" affiliationRef="#a1" corresponding="yes"><personName><givenNames>Sibel</givenNames><familyName>Bergenblock</familyName><degrees>DDS</degrees></personName></creator><creator creatorRole="author" xml:id="cr2" affiliationRef="#a1"><personName><givenNames>Bernt</givenNames><familyName>Andersson</familyName><degrees>DDS, Odont Dr/PhD</degrees></personName></creator><creator creatorRole="author" xml:id="cr3" affiliationRef="#a1 #a2"><personName><givenNames>Björn</givenNames><familyName>Fürst</familyName><degrees>DDS</degrees></personName></creator><creator creatorRole="author" xml:id="cr4" affiliationRef="#a3 #a4"><personName><givenNames>Torsten</givenNames><familyName>Jemt</familyName><degrees>DDS, Odont Dr/PhD</degrees></personName></creator></creators><affiliationGroup><affiliation xml:id="a1" countryCode="SE"><unparsedAffiliation>Prosthodontist, Specialist Clinic of Prosthetic Dentistry, Public Dental Health Service, Mölndal Hospital, Västra Götaland, Sweden;</unparsedAffiliation></affiliation><affiliation xml:id="a2" countryCode="SE"><unparsedAffiliation>chairman, Specialist Clinic of Prosthetic Dentistry, Public Dental Health Service, Mölndal Hospital, Västra Götaland, Sweden;</unparsedAffiliation></affiliation><affiliation xml:id="a3" countryCode="SE"><unparsedAffiliation>professor, Department of Prosthetic Dentistry/Dental Material Science, Institute of Odontology, Sahlgrenska Academy at Göteborg University, Göteborg, Sweden;</unparsedAffiliation></affiliation><affiliation xml:id="a4" countryCode="SE"><unparsedAffiliation>prosthodontist, Brånemark Clinic, Public Dental Health Service, Västra Götaland, Sweden</unparsedAffiliation></affiliation></affiliationGroup><keywordGroup xml:lang="en"><keyword xml:id="k1">bone loss</keyword><keyword xml:id="k2">ceramic crowns</keyword><keyword xml:id="k3">complications</keyword><keyword xml:id="k4">dental implants</keyword><keyword xml:id="k5">follow‐up</keyword><keyword xml:id="k6">infraposition</keyword><keyword xml:id="k7">single‐tooth</keyword></keywordGroup><abstractGroup><abstract type="main" xml:lang="en"><title type="main">ABSTRACT</title><p><b>Background:</b> Knowledge on long‐term clinical performance of more than 5 years on the single‐implant CeraOne™ (Nobel Biocare AB, Gothenburg, Sweden) concept is limited.</p><p><b>Purpose:</b> The aim of this study is to report the long‐term clinical performance of the first CeraOne single‐implant restorations, installed 17 to 19 years ago.</p><p><b>Materials and Methods:</b> The group comprised 57 patients provided with 65 CeraOne single‐tooth restorations. Sixty‐two all‐ceramic and three metal‐ceramic crowns were cemented between 1989 and 1991. Patients were followed up clinically and with intraoral radiographs at placement, after 1, 5, and between 17 and 19 years after placement.</p><p><b>Results:</b> Data were available for altogether 48 patients, followed up on an average time of 18 years. Excluding deceased patients (<i>n</i> = 2) and failed implant patients (<i>n</i> = 2), only five patients were lost to follow‐up (8.8%). Two implants failed, resulting in an 18‐year implant cumulative success rate (CSR) of 96.8%, and altogether eight original single‐crown restorations were replaced (CSR 83.8%). The most common reason for crown replacement was infra‐position of the implant crown (<i>n</i> = 3). Many of the remaining original crowns showed various signs of implant crown infraposition at the termination of the study. In general, the soft tissue at the restorations was assessed to be healthy and comparable with the gingiva at the adjacent natural teeth. Bone levels were on an average stable with only few patients exhibiting bone loss of more than 2 mm during 18 years in function.</p><p><b>Conclusion:</b> This long‐term follow‐up study of single‐implant restorations shows encouraging results with few implant failures and minimal bone loss over an 18‐year period. Original single‐crown restorations were replaced more frequently, because of, for example, implant crown infraposition and veneer fractures. The CeraOne concept proved to be a highly predictable and safe prosthodontic treatment.</p></abstract></abstractGroup></contentMeta></header></component></istex:document></istex:metadataXml><mods version="3.6"><titleInfo lang="en"><title>Long‐Term Follow‐Up of CeraOne™ Single‐Implant Restorations: An 18‐Year Follow‐Up Study Based on a Prospective Patient Cohort</title></titleInfo><titleInfo type="abbreviated" lang="en"><title>Long‐Term Follow‐Up of CeraOne™ Single‐Implant Restorations</title></titleInfo><titleInfo type="alternative" contentType="CDATA" lang="en"><title>Long‐Term Follow‐Up of CeraOne™ Single‐Implant Restorations: An 18‐Year Follow‐Up Study Based on a Prospective Patient Cohort</title></titleInfo><name type="personal"><namePart type="given">Sibel</namePart><namePart type="family">Bergenblock</namePart><namePart type="termsOfAddress">DDS</namePart><affiliation>Prosthodontist, Specialist Clinic of Prosthetic Dentistry, Public Dental Health Service, Mölndal Hospital, Västra Götaland, Sweden;</affiliation><affiliation>E-mail: sibel.bergenblock@vgregion.se</affiliation><role><roleTerm type="text">author</roleTerm></role></name><name type="personal"><namePart type="given">Bernt</namePart><namePart type="family">Andersson</namePart><namePart type="termsOfAddress">DDS, Odont Dr/PhD</namePart><affiliation>Prosthodontist, Specialist Clinic of Prosthetic Dentistry, Public Dental Health Service, Mölndal Hospital, Västra Götaland, Sweden;</affiliation><role><roleTerm type="text">author</roleTerm></role></name><name type="personal"><namePart type="given">Björn</namePart><namePart type="family">Fürst</namePart><namePart type="termsOfAddress">DDS</namePart><affiliation>Prosthodontist, Specialist Clinic of Prosthetic Dentistry, Public Dental Health Service, Mölndal Hospital, Västra Götaland, Sweden;</affiliation><affiliation>chairman, Specialist Clinic of Prosthetic Dentistry, Public Dental Health Service, Mölndal Hospital, Västra Götaland, Sweden;</affiliation><role><roleTerm type="text">author</roleTerm></role></name><name type="personal"><namePart type="given">Torsten</namePart><namePart type="family">Jemt</namePart><namePart type="termsOfAddress">DDS, Odont Dr/PhD</namePart><affiliation>professor, Department of Prosthetic Dentistry/Dental Material Science, Institute of Odontology, Sahlgrenska Academy at Göteborg University, Göteborg, Sweden;</affiliation><affiliation>prosthodontist, Brånemark Clinic, Public Dental Health Service, Västra Götaland, Sweden</affiliation><role><roleTerm type="text">author</roleTerm></role></name><typeOfResource>text</typeOfResource><genre type="article" displayLabel="article" authority="ISTEX" authorityURI="https://content-type.data.istex.fr" valueURI="https://content-type.data.istex.fr/ark:/67375/XTP-6N5SZHKN-D">article</genre><originInfo><publisher>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</publisher><place><placeTerm type="text">Oxford, UK</placeTerm></place><dateIssued encoding="w3cdtf">2012-08</dateIssued><copyrightDate encoding="w3cdtf">2012</copyrightDate></originInfo><language><languageTerm type="code" authority="rfc3066">en</languageTerm><languageTerm type="code" authority="iso639-2b">eng</languageTerm></language><physicalDescription><extent unit="figures">1</extent><extent unit="tables">4</extent><extent unit="formulas">0</extent><extent unit="references">33</extent><extent unit="linksCrossRef">0</extent><extent unit="words">0</extent></physicalDescription><abstract>Background: Knowledge on long‐term clinical performance of more than 5 years on the single‐implant CeraOne™ (Nobel Biocare AB, Gothenburg, Sweden) concept is limited.</abstract><abstract>Purpose: The aim of this study is to report the long‐term clinical performance of the first CeraOne single‐implant restorations, installed 17 to 19 years ago.</abstract><abstract>Materials and Methods: The group comprised 57 patients provided with 65 CeraOne single‐tooth restorations. Sixty‐two all‐ceramic and three metal‐ceramic crowns were cemented between 1989 and 1991. Patients were followed up clinically and with intraoral radiographs at placement, after 1, 5, and between 17 and 19 years after placement.</abstract><abstract>Results: Data were available for altogether 48 patients, followed up on an average time of 18 years. Excluding deceased patients (n = 2) and failed implant patients (n = 2), only five patients were lost to follow‐up (8.8%). Two implants failed, resulting in an 18‐year implant cumulative success rate (CSR) of 96.8%, and altogether eight original single‐crown restorations were replaced (CSR 83.8%). The most common reason for crown replacement was infra‐position of the implant crown (n = 3). Many of the remaining original crowns showed various signs of implant crown infraposition at the termination of the study. In general, the soft tissue at the restorations was assessed to be healthy and comparable with the gingiva at the adjacent natural teeth. Bone levels were on an average stable with only few patients exhibiting bone loss of more than 2 mm during 18 years in function.</abstract><abstract>Conclusion: This long‐term follow‐up study of single‐implant restorations shows encouraging results with few implant failures and minimal bone loss over an 18‐year period. Original single‐crown restorations were replaced more frequently, because of, for example, implant crown infraposition and veneer fractures. The CeraOne concept proved to be a highly predictable and safe prosthodontic treatment.</abstract><subject lang="en"><genre>keywords</genre><topic>bone loss</topic><topic>ceramic crowns</topic><topic>complications</topic><topic>dental implants</topic><topic>follow‐up</topic><topic>infraposition</topic><topic>single‐tooth</topic></subject><relatedItem type="host"><titleInfo><title>Clinical Implant Dentistry and Related Research</title></titleInfo><genre type="journal" authority="ISTEX" authorityURI="https://publication-type.data.istex.fr" valueURI="https://publication-type.data.istex.fr/ark:/67375/JMC-0GLKJH51-B">journal</genre><identifier type="ISSN">1523-0899</identifier><identifier type="eISSN">1708-8208</identifier><identifier type="DOI">10.1111/(ISSN)1708-8208</identifier><identifier type="PublisherID">CID</identifier><part><date>2012</date><detail type="volume"><caption>vol.</caption><number>14</number></detail><detail type="issue"><caption>no.</caption><number>4</number></detail><extent unit="pages"><start>471</start><end>479</end><total>9</total></extent></part></relatedItem><identifier type="istex">D06A62A8E43235482B9B61B34DA4280755626455</identifier><identifier type="ark">ark:/67375/WNG-WQ5B3TXL-C</identifier><identifier type="DOI">10.1111/j.1708-8208.2010.00290.x</identifier><identifier type="ArticleID">CID290</identifier><accessCondition type="use and reproduction" contentType="copyright">© 2010 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.</accessCondition><recordInfo><recordContentSource authority="ISTEX" authorityURI="https://loaded-corpus.data.istex.fr" valueURI="https://loaded-corpus.data.istex.fr/ark:/67375/XBH-L0C46X92-X">wiley</recordContentSource><recordOrigin>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</recordOrigin></recordInfo></mods><json:item><extension>json</extension><original>false</original><mimetype>application/json</mimetype><uri>https://api.istex.fr/document/D06A62A8E43235482B9B61B34DA4280755626455/metadata/json</uri></json:item></metadata><serie></serie></istex></record>Pour manipuler ce document sous Unix (Dilib)
EXPLOR_STEP=$WICRI_ROOT/Wicri/Santé/explor/EdenteV2/Data/Istex/Corpus
HfdSelect -h $EXPLOR_STEP/biblio.hfd -nk 006774 | SxmlIndent | more
Ou
HfdSelect -h $EXPLOR_AREA/Data/Istex/Corpus/biblio.hfd -nk 006774 | SxmlIndent | more
Pour mettre un lien sur cette page dans le réseau Wicri
{{Explor lien
|wiki= Wicri/Santé
|area= EdenteV2
|flux= Istex
|étape= Corpus
|type= RBID
|clé= ISTEX:D06A62A8E43235482B9B61B34DA4280755626455
|texte= Long‐Term Follow‐Up of CeraOne™ Single‐Implant Restorations: An 18‐Year Follow‐Up Study Based on a Prospective Patient Cohort
}}
| This area was generated with Dilib version V0.6.32. |  |