Comparison of Fit Accuracy between Procera® Custom Abutments and Three Implant Systems
Identifieur interne : 006678 ( Istex/Corpus ); précédent : 006677; suivant : 006679Comparison of Fit Accuracy between Procera® Custom Abutments and Three Implant Systems
Auteurs : Tiago De Morais Alves Da Cunha ; Roberto Paulo Correia De Araújo ; Paulo Vicente Barbosa Da Rocha ; Rosa Maria Pazos AmoedoSource :
- Clinical Implant Dentistry and Related Research [ 1523-0899 ] ; 2012-12.
English descriptors
- KwdEn :
- Abutment, Biocare, Bone response, Central area, Clin implant dent relat, Clinical implant dentistry, Current study, Custom abutments, Dent, Dental implants, Different manufacturers, Experimental group, Experimental groups, Federal university, Horizontal discrepancies, Ideal level, Implant, Implant systems, Implants sistema, Interface, Master screw, Microbial colonization, Microgap, Morais alves, Nite element analysis, Nobel biocare, Nobel biocare group, Occlusal forces, Oral maxillofac implants, Other implant systems, Photoelastic analysis, Procera, Procera abutment, Procera abutments, Procera custom abutment, Procera custom abutments, Procera zirconia abutment, Prosthesis, Prosthet, Prosthet dent, Right edges, Same manufacturer, Statistical differences, Stress distribution, Stress transfer, System implants, Vivo study, Zirconia, Zirconia abutments.
- Teeft :
- Abutment, Biocare, Bone response, Central area, Clin implant dent relat, Clinical implant dentistry, Current study, Custom abutments, Dent, Dental implants, Different manufacturers, Experimental group, Experimental groups, Federal university, Horizontal discrepancies, Ideal level, Implant, Implant systems, Implants sistema, Interface, Master screw, Microbial colonization, Microgap, Morais alves, Nite element analysis, Nobel biocare, Nobel biocare group, Occlusal forces, Oral maxillofac implants, Other implant systems, Photoelastic analysis, Procera, Procera abutment, Procera abutments, Procera custom abutment, Procera custom abutments, Procera zirconia abutment, Prosthesis, Prosthet, Prosthet dent, Right edges, Same manufacturer, Statistical differences, Stress distribution, Stress transfer, System implants, Vivo study, Zirconia, Zirconia abutments.
Abstract
Background: Although increase of misfit has been reported when associating implant and abutment from different manufacturers, Procera custom abutment has been universally used in clinical practice.
Url:
DOI: 10.1111/j.1708-8208.2010.00323.x
Links to Exploration step
ISTEX:CEA615F09F0C926799A741F4F967552A4171A78FLe document en format XML
<record><TEI wicri:istexFullTextTei="biblStruct"><teiHeader><fileDesc><titleStmt><title xml:lang="en">Comparison of Fit Accuracy between Procera® Custom Abutments and Three Implant Systems</title><author><name sortKey="De Morais Alves Da Cunha, Tiago" sort="De Morais Alves Da Cunha, Tiago" uniqKey="De Morais Alves Da Cunha T" first="Tiago" last="De Morais Alves Da Cunha">Tiago De Morais Alves Da Cunha</name><affiliation><mods:affiliation>Professor, Department of Prosthodontics, School of Dentistry, UNIME, Bahia, Brazil;</mods:affiliation></affiliation><affiliation><mods:affiliation>E-mail: tiagoalvescunha@hotmail.com</mods:affiliation></affiliation></author><author><name sortKey="De Araujo, Roberto Paulo Correia" sort="De Araujo, Roberto Paulo Correia" uniqKey="De Araujo R" first="Roberto Paulo Correia" last="De Araújo">Roberto Paulo Correia De Araújo</name><affiliation><mods:affiliation>associate professor, Department of Biochemistry, Federal University of Bahia, Brazil;</mods:affiliation></affiliation></author><author><name sortKey="Da Rocha, Paulo Vicente Barbosa" sort="Da Rocha, Paulo Vicente Barbosa" uniqKey="Da Rocha P" first="Paulo Vicente Barbosa" last="Da Rocha">Paulo Vicente Barbosa Da Rocha</name><affiliation><mods:affiliation>adjunct professor of prosthodontics, Federal University of Bahia, Brazil;</mods:affiliation></affiliation></author><author><name sortKey="Amoedo, Rosa Maria Pazos" sort="Amoedo, Rosa Maria Pazos" uniqKey="Amoedo R" first="Rosa Maria Pazos" last="Amoedo">Rosa Maria Pazos Amoedo</name><affiliation><mods:affiliation>professor, Department of Prosthodontics, School of Dentistry, UNIME, Bahia, Brazil</mods:affiliation></affiliation></author></titleStmt><publicationStmt><idno type="wicri:source">ISTEX</idno><idno type="RBID">ISTEX:CEA615F09F0C926799A741F4F967552A4171A78F</idno><date when="2012" year="2012">2012</date><idno type="doi">10.1111/j.1708-8208.2010.00323.x</idno><idno type="url">https://api.istex.fr/document/CEA615F09F0C926799A741F4F967552A4171A78F/fulltext/pdf</idno><idno type="wicri:Area/Istex/Corpus">006678</idno><idno type="wicri:explorRef" wicri:stream="Istex" wicri:step="Corpus" wicri:corpus="ISTEX">006678</idno></publicationStmt><sourceDesc><biblStruct><analytic><title level="a" type="main">Comparison of Fit Accuracy between Procera® Custom Abutments and Three Implant Systems</title><author><name sortKey="De Morais Alves Da Cunha, Tiago" sort="De Morais Alves Da Cunha, Tiago" uniqKey="De Morais Alves Da Cunha T" first="Tiago" last="De Morais Alves Da Cunha">Tiago De Morais Alves Da Cunha</name><affiliation><mods:affiliation>Professor, Department of Prosthodontics, School of Dentistry, UNIME, Bahia, Brazil;</mods:affiliation></affiliation><affiliation><mods:affiliation>E-mail: tiagoalvescunha@hotmail.com</mods:affiliation></affiliation></author><author><name sortKey="De Araujo, Roberto Paulo Correia" sort="De Araujo, Roberto Paulo Correia" uniqKey="De Araujo R" first="Roberto Paulo Correia" last="De Araújo">Roberto Paulo Correia De Araújo</name><affiliation><mods:affiliation>associate professor, Department of Biochemistry, Federal University of Bahia, Brazil;</mods:affiliation></affiliation></author><author><name sortKey="Da Rocha, Paulo Vicente Barbosa" sort="Da Rocha, Paulo Vicente Barbosa" uniqKey="Da Rocha P" first="Paulo Vicente Barbosa" last="Da Rocha">Paulo Vicente Barbosa Da Rocha</name><affiliation><mods:affiliation>adjunct professor of prosthodontics, Federal University of Bahia, Brazil;</mods:affiliation></affiliation></author><author><name sortKey="Amoedo, Rosa Maria Pazos" sort="Amoedo, Rosa Maria Pazos" uniqKey="Amoedo R" first="Rosa Maria Pazos" last="Amoedo">Rosa Maria Pazos Amoedo</name><affiliation><mods:affiliation>professor, Department of Prosthodontics, School of Dentistry, UNIME, Bahia, Brazil</mods:affiliation></affiliation></author></analytic><monogr></monogr><series><title level="j" type="main">Clinical Implant Dentistry and Related Research</title><title level="j" type="alt">CLINICAL IMPLANT DENTISTRY RELATED RESEARCH</title><idno type="ISSN">1523-0899</idno><idno type="eISSN">1708-8208</idno><imprint><biblScope unit="vol">14</biblScope><biblScope unit="issue">6</biblScope><biblScope unit="page" from="890">890</biblScope><biblScope unit="page" to="895">895</biblScope><biblScope unit="page-count">6</biblScope><publisher>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</publisher><pubPlace>Oxford, UK</pubPlace><date type="published" when="2012-12">2012-12</date></imprint><idno type="ISSN">1523-0899</idno></series></biblStruct></sourceDesc><seriesStmt><idno type="ISSN">1523-0899</idno></seriesStmt></fileDesc><profileDesc><textClass><keywords scheme="KwdEn" xml:lang="en"><term>Abutment</term><term>Biocare</term><term>Bone response</term><term>Central area</term><term>Clin implant dent relat</term><term>Clinical implant dentistry</term><term>Current study</term><term>Custom abutments</term><term>Dent</term><term>Dental implants</term><term>Different manufacturers</term><term>Experimental group</term><term>Experimental groups</term><term>Federal university</term><term>Horizontal discrepancies</term><term>Ideal level</term><term>Implant</term><term>Implant systems</term><term>Implants sistema</term><term>Interface</term><term>Master screw</term><term>Microbial colonization</term><term>Microgap</term><term>Morais alves</term><term>Nite element analysis</term><term>Nobel biocare</term><term>Nobel biocare group</term><term>Occlusal forces</term><term>Oral maxillofac implants</term><term>Other implant systems</term><term>Photoelastic analysis</term><term>Procera</term><term>Procera abutment</term><term>Procera abutments</term><term>Procera custom abutment</term><term>Procera custom abutments</term><term>Procera zirconia abutment</term><term>Prosthesis</term><term>Prosthet</term><term>Prosthet dent</term><term>Right edges</term><term>Same manufacturer</term><term>Statistical differences</term><term>Stress distribution</term><term>Stress transfer</term><term>System implants</term><term>Vivo study</term><term>Zirconia</term><term>Zirconia abutments</term></keywords><keywords scheme="Teeft" xml:lang="en"><term>Abutment</term><term>Biocare</term><term>Bone response</term><term>Central area</term><term>Clin implant dent relat</term><term>Clinical implant dentistry</term><term>Current study</term><term>Custom abutments</term><term>Dent</term><term>Dental implants</term><term>Different manufacturers</term><term>Experimental group</term><term>Experimental groups</term><term>Federal university</term><term>Horizontal discrepancies</term><term>Ideal level</term><term>Implant</term><term>Implant systems</term><term>Implants sistema</term><term>Interface</term><term>Master screw</term><term>Microbial colonization</term><term>Microgap</term><term>Morais alves</term><term>Nite element analysis</term><term>Nobel biocare</term><term>Nobel biocare group</term><term>Occlusal forces</term><term>Oral maxillofac implants</term><term>Other implant systems</term><term>Photoelastic analysis</term><term>Procera</term><term>Procera abutment</term><term>Procera abutments</term><term>Procera custom abutment</term><term>Procera custom abutments</term><term>Procera zirconia abutment</term><term>Prosthesis</term><term>Prosthet</term><term>Prosthet dent</term><term>Right edges</term><term>Same manufacturer</term><term>Statistical differences</term><term>Stress distribution</term><term>Stress transfer</term><term>System implants</term><term>Vivo study</term><term>Zirconia</term><term>Zirconia abutments</term></keywords></textClass></profileDesc></teiHeader><front><div type="abstract">Background: Although increase of misfit has been reported when associating implant and abutment from different manufacturers, Procera custom abutment has been universally used in clinical practice.</div></front></TEI><istex><corpusName>wiley</corpusName><keywords><teeft><json:string>abutment</json:string><json:string>implant</json:string><json:string>procera</json:string><json:string>biocare</json:string><json:string>nobel biocare</json:string><json:string>prosthesis</json:string><json:string>zirconia</json:string><json:string>procera abutment</json:string><json:string>implant systems</json:string><json:string>microgap</json:string><json:string>prosthet</json:string><json:string>prosthet dent</json:string><json:string>oral maxillofac implants</json:string><json:string>other implant systems</json:string><json:string>experimental group</json:string><json:string>stress distribution</json:string><json:string>procera abutments</json:string><json:string>nite element analysis</json:string><json:string>right edges</json:string><json:string>dent</json:string><json:string>interface</json:string><json:string>central area</json:string><json:string>experimental groups</json:string><json:string>current study</json:string><json:string>horizontal discrepancies</json:string><json:string>procera custom abutments</json:string><json:string>dental implants</json:string><json:string>different manufacturers</json:string><json:string>system implants</json:string><json:string>zirconia abutments</json:string><json:string>same manufacturer</json:string><json:string>clinical implant dentistry</json:string><json:string>statistical differences</json:string><json:string>morais alves</json:string><json:string>procera zirconia abutment</json:string><json:string>photoelastic analysis</json:string><json:string>bone response</json:string><json:string>ideal level</json:string><json:string>procera custom abutment</json:string><json:string>occlusal forces</json:string><json:string>federal university</json:string><json:string>nobel biocare group</json:string><json:string>custom abutments</json:string><json:string>microbial colonization</json:string><json:string>clin implant dent relat</json:string><json:string>master screw</json:string><json:string>vivo study</json:string><json:string>implants sistema</json:string><json:string>stress transfer</json:string></teeft></keywords><author><json:item><name>Tiago de Morais Alves da Cunha MSCD</name><affiliations><json:string>Professor, Department of Prosthodontics, School of Dentistry, UNIME, Bahia, Brazil;</json:string><json:string>E-mail: tiagoalvescunha@hotmail.com</json:string></affiliations></json:item><json:item><name>Roberto Paulo Correia de Araújo</name><affiliations><json:string>associate professor, Department of Biochemistry, Federal University of Bahia, Brazil;</json:string></affiliations></json:item><json:item><name>Paulo Vicente Barbosa da Rocha</name><affiliations><json:string>adjunct professor of prosthodontics, Federal University of Bahia, Brazil;</json:string></affiliations></json:item><json:item><name>Rosa Maria Pazos Amoedo</name><affiliations><json:string>professor, Department of Prosthodontics, School of Dentistry, UNIME, Bahia, Brazil</json:string></affiliations></json:item></author><subject><json:item><lang><json:string>eng</json:string></lang><value>dental implants</value></json:item><json:item><lang><json:string>eng</json:string></lang><value>implant‐supported prosthesis</value></json:item><json:item><lang><json:string>eng</json:string></lang><value>misfit</value></json:item><json:item><lang><json:string>eng</json:string></lang><value>prosthodontic planning</value></json:item></subject><articleId><json:string>CID323</json:string></articleId><arkIstex>ark:/67375/WNG-XG1DMSVW-L</arkIstex><language><json:string>eng</json:string></language><originalGenre><json:string>article</json:string></originalGenre><abstract>Background: Although increase of misfit has been reported when associating implant and abutment from different manufacturers, Procera custom abutment has been universally used in clinical practice.</abstract><qualityIndicators><score>5.166</score><pdfWordCount>2854</pdfWordCount><pdfCharCount>19103</pdfCharCount><pdfVersion>1.3</pdfVersion><pdfPageCount>6</pdfPageCount><pdfPageSize>585 x 783 pts</pdfPageSize><refBibsNative>true</refBibsNative><abstractWordCount>26</abstractWordCount><abstractCharCount>197</abstractCharCount><keywordCount>4</keywordCount></qualityIndicators><title>Comparison of Fit Accuracy between Procera® Custom Abutments and Three Implant Systems</title><pmid><json:string>21176100</json:string></pmid><genre><json:string>article</json:string></genre><host><title>Clinical Implant Dentistry and Related Research</title><language><json:string>unknown</json:string></language><doi><json:string>10.1111/(ISSN)1708-8208</json:string></doi><issn><json:string>1523-0899</json:string></issn><eissn><json:string>1708-8208</json:string></eissn><publisherId><json:string>CID</json:string></publisherId><volume>14</volume><issue>6</issue><pages><first>890</first><last>895</last><total>6</total></pages><genre><json:string>journal</json:string></genre><subject><json:item><value>ARTICLE</value></json:item></subject></host><namedEntities><unitex><date><json:string>2012</json:string></date><geogName></geogName><orgName><json:string>Wiley Periodicals, Inc.</json:string><json:string>SPSS Inc., Chicago</json:string><json:string>Department of Prosthodontics, School of Dentistry, UNIME, Bahia, Brazil Reprint</json:string><json:string>Implant Systems</json:string><json:string>Related Research, Volume</json:string><json:string>Department of Prosthodontics, School of Dentistry, UNIME, Bahia, Brazil</json:string><json:string>Zimmer Dental Inc.</json:string><json:string>Federal University</json:string><json:string>Department of Biochemistry, Federal University of Bahia, Brazil</json:string></orgName><orgName_funder></orgName_funder><orgName_provider></orgName_provider><persName><json:string>Piattelli</json:string><json:string>Jansen</json:string><json:string>Paulo Vicente</json:string><json:string>Tiago de Morais</json:string><json:string>Rosa Maria</json:string><json:string>Roberto Paulo</json:string><json:string>Assunção</json:string></persName><placeName><json:string>Carlsbad</json:string><json:string>Germany</json:string><json:string>Brazil</json:string><json:string>Austria</json:string><json:string>USA</json:string><json:string>CA</json:string><json:string>Palm Beach</json:string><json:string>Sweden</json:string><json:string>São Paulo</json:string></placeName><ref_url></ref_url><ref_bibl><json:string>Department of Prosthodontics, School of Dentistry, Avenue Antônio Carlos Magalhães, 3359</json:string></ref_bibl><bibl></bibl></unitex></namedEntities><ark><json:string>ark:/67375/WNG-XG1DMSVW-L</json:string></ark><categories><wos><json:string>1 - science</json:string><json:string>2 - dentistry, oral surgery & medicine</json:string></wos><scienceMetrix><json:string>1 - health sciences</json:string><json:string>2 - clinical medicine</json:string><json:string>3 - dentistry</json:string></scienceMetrix><scopus><json:string>1 - Health Sciences</json:string><json:string>2 - Dentistry</json:string><json:string>3 - General Dentistry</json:string><json:string>1 - Health Sciences</json:string><json:string>2 - Dentistry</json:string><json:string>3 - Oral Surgery</json:string></scopus></categories><publicationDate>2012</publicationDate><copyrightDate>2012</copyrightDate><doi><json:string>10.1111/j.1708-8208.2010.00323.x</json:string></doi><id>CEA615F09F0C926799A741F4F967552A4171A78F</id><score>1</score><fulltext><json:item><extension>pdf</extension><original>true</original><mimetype>application/pdf</mimetype><uri>https://api.istex.fr/document/CEA615F09F0C926799A741F4F967552A4171A78F/fulltext/pdf</uri></json:item><json:item><extension>zip</extension><original>false</original><mimetype>application/zip</mimetype><uri>https://api.istex.fr/document/CEA615F09F0C926799A741F4F967552A4171A78F/fulltext/zip</uri></json:item><istex:fulltextTEI uri="https://api.istex.fr/document/CEA615F09F0C926799A741F4F967552A4171A78F/fulltext/tei"><teiHeader><fileDesc><titleStmt><title level="a" type="main">Comparison of Fit Accuracy between Procera® Custom Abutments and Three Implant Systems</title></titleStmt><publicationStmt><authority>ISTEX</authority><publisher>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</publisher><pubPlace>Oxford, UK</pubPlace><availability><licence>© 2010 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.</licence></availability><date type="published" when="2012-12"></date></publicationStmt><notesStmt><note type="content-type" subtype="article" source="article" scheme="https://content-type.data.istex.fr/ark:/67375/XTP-6N5SZHKN-D">article</note><note type="publication-type" subtype="journal" scheme="https://publication-type.data.istex.fr/ark:/67375/JMC-0GLKJH51-B">journal</note></notesStmt><sourceDesc><biblStruct type="article"><analytic><title level="a" type="main">Comparison of Fit Accuracy between Procera® Custom Abutments and Three Implant Systems</title><title level="a" type="short">Comparison of Fit Accuracy between Procera Custom Abutments and Three Implant Systems</title><author xml:id="author-0000" role="corresp"><persName><forename type="first">Tiago</forename><surname>de Morais Alves da Cunha</surname><roleName type="degree">MSCD</roleName></persName><affiliation>Professor, Department of Prosthodontics, School of Dentistry, UNIME, Bahia, Brazil;<address><country key="BR"></country></address></affiliation><affiliation>Dr. Tiago de Morais Alves da Cunha, MSCD, Department of Prosthodontics, School of Dentistry, Avenue Antônio Carlos Magalhães, 3359, Ap 1104N, Salvador, Bahia 41800‐700, Brazil; e‐mail: tiagoalvescunha@hotmail.com</affiliation></author><author xml:id="author-0001"><persName><forename type="first">Roberto Paulo Correia</forename><surname>de Araújo</surname></persName><affiliation>associate professor, Department of Biochemistry, Federal University of Bahia, Brazil;<address><country key="BR"></country></address></affiliation></author><author xml:id="author-0002"><persName><forename type="first">Paulo Vicente Barbosa</forename><surname>da Rocha</surname></persName><affiliation>adjunct professor of prosthodontics, Federal University of Bahia, Brazil;<address><country key="BR"></country></address></affiliation></author><author xml:id="author-0003"><persName><forename type="first">Rosa Maria Pazos</forename><surname>Amoedo</surname></persName><affiliation>professor, Department of Prosthodontics, School of Dentistry, UNIME, Bahia, Brazil<address><country key="BR"></country></address></affiliation></author><idno type="istex">CEA615F09F0C926799A741F4F967552A4171A78F</idno><idno type="ark">ark:/67375/WNG-XG1DMSVW-L</idno><idno type="DOI">10.1111/j.1708-8208.2010.00323.x</idno><idno type="unit">CID323</idno><idno type="toTypesetVersion">file:CID.CID323.pdf</idno></analytic><monogr><title level="j" type="main">Clinical Implant Dentistry and Related Research</title><title level="j" type="alt">CLINICAL IMPLANT DENTISTRY RELATED RESEARCH</title><idno type="pISSN">1523-0899</idno><idno type="eISSN">1708-8208</idno><idno type="book-DOI">10.1111/(ISSN)1708-8208</idno><idno type="book-part-DOI">10.1111/cid.2012.14.issue-6</idno><idno type="product">CID</idno><idno type="publisherDivision">ST</idno><imprint><biblScope unit="vol">14</biblScope><biblScope unit="issue">6</biblScope><biblScope unit="page" from="890">890</biblScope><biblScope unit="page" to="895">895</biblScope><biblScope unit="page-count">6</biblScope><publisher>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</publisher><pubPlace>Oxford, UK</pubPlace><date type="published" when="2012-12"></date></imprint></monogr></biblStruct></sourceDesc></fileDesc><profileDesc><abstract xml:lang="en" style="main"><head>ABSTRACT</head><p><hi rend="bold">Background:</hi> Although increase of misfit has been reported when associating implant and abutment from different manufacturers, Procera custom abutment has been universally used in clinical practice.</p><p><hi rend="bold">Purpose:</hi> The purpose of this investigation was to compare the vertical gap of zirconia Procera® abutment associated with implants from the same manufacturer (Procera manufacturer) and two other implant systems.</p><p><hi rend="bold">Materials and Methods:</hi> Twenty‐four zirconia Procera abutments were produced using computer‐assisted design and manufacture and paired with (a) eight MK III, RP 4.1 × 10 mm implants (Nobel Biocare™, Göteborg, Sweden) – GNB group (Nobel Biocare group); (b) eight Try on, 4.1 × 10 mm implants (Sistema de Implantes, São Paulo, Brazil) – ES group (SIN experimental group) ; and (c) eight Master screw, 4.1 × 10 mm implants (Conexão® Sistema de Prótese, São Paulo, Brazil) – EC group (Conexão experimental group). A comparison of the vertical misfit at the implant–abutment interface was taken at six measuring sites on each sample using scanning electron microscopy with a magnification of 408×. One‐way analysis of variance was used to test for differences, and Tukey's test was used for pair‐wise comparison of groups (α = 0.05).</p><p><hi rend="bold">Results:</hi> Significant differences relative to average misfit were found when Procera abutments were associated with other implant manufacturers. The ES group and EC group did not differ significantly, but both demonstrated significantly larger average misfit than the GNB group (<hi rend="italic">p</hi> = .001). The average misfit was 5.7 µm ± 0.39, 9.53 µm ± 0.52, and 10.62 µm ± 2.16, respectively, for groups GNB, ES, and EC.</p><p><hi rend="bold">Conclusion:</hi> The association of Procera zirconia abutment with other implant systems different from its manufacturer demonstrated significant alteration of vertical misfit at implant–abutment interface.</p></abstract><textClass><keywords xml:lang="en"><term xml:id="k1">dental implants</term><term xml:id="k2">implant‐supported prosthesis</term><term xml:id="k3">misfit</term><term xml:id="k4">prosthodontic planning</term></keywords><keywords rend="tocHeading1"><term>ARTICLES</term></keywords><keywords rend="articleCategory"><term>ARTICLE</term></keywords></textClass><langUsage><language ident="en"></language></langUsage></profileDesc></teiHeader></istex:fulltextTEI><json:item><extension>txt</extension><original>false</original><mimetype>text/plain</mimetype><uri>https://api.istex.fr/document/CEA615F09F0C926799A741F4F967552A4171A78F/fulltext/txt</uri></json:item></fulltext><metadata><istex:metadataXml wicri:clean="Wiley, elements deleted: body"><istex:xmlDeclaration>version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" standalone="yes"</istex:xmlDeclaration><istex:document><component version="2.0" type="serialArticle" xml:lang="en"><header><publicationMeta level="product"><publisherInfo><publisherName>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</publisherName><publisherLoc>Oxford, UK</publisherLoc></publisherInfo><doi origin="wiley" registered="yes">10.1111/(ISSN)1708-8208</doi><issn type="print">1523-0899</issn><issn type="electronic">1708-8208</issn><idGroup><id type="product" value="CID"></id><id type="publisherDivision" value="ST"></id></idGroup><titleGroup><title type="main" sort="CLINICAL IMPLANT DENTISTRY RELATED RESEARCH">Clinical Implant Dentistry and Related Research</title></titleGroup></publicationMeta><publicationMeta level="part" position="12106"><doi>10.1111/cid.2012.14.issue-6</doi><copyright ownership="publisher">Copyright © 2012 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.</copyright><numberingGroup><numbering number="14" type="journalVolume">14</numbering><numbering type="journalIssue">6</numbering></numberingGroup><coverDate startDate="2012-12">December 2012</coverDate></publicationMeta><publicationMeta level="unit" position="130" status="forIssue" type="article"><doi origin="wiley">10.1111/j.1708-8208.2010.00323.x</doi><idGroup><id type="unit" value="CID323"></id></idGroup><countGroup><count type="pageTotal" number="6"></count></countGroup><titleGroup><title type="tocHeading1">ARTICLES</title><title type="articleCategory">ARTICLE</title></titleGroup><copyright>© 2010 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.</copyright><eventGroup><event type="xmlConverted" agent="Converter:BPG_TO_WML3G version:3.1.9 mode:FullText" date="2012-12-02"></event><event date="2012-12-03" type="xmlCorrected"></event><event type="publishedOnlineEarlyUnpaginated" date="2010-12-22"></event><event type="firstOnline" date="2010-12-22"></event><event type="publishedOnlineFinalForm" date="2012-12-03"></event><event type="xmlConverted" agent="Converter:WILEY_ML3G_TO_WILEY_ML3GV2 version:3.8.8" date="2014-01-15"></event><event type="xmlConverted" agent="Converter:WML3G_To_WML3G version:4.3.4 mode:FullText" date="2015-02-25"></event></eventGroup><numberingGroup><numbering type="pageFirst">890</numbering><numbering type="pageLast">895</numbering></numberingGroup><correspondenceTo>Dr. Tiago de Morais Alves da Cunha, MSCD, Department of Prosthodontics, School of Dentistry, Avenue Antônio Carlos Magalhães, 3359, Ap 1104N, Salvador, Bahia 41800‐700, Brazil; e‐mail: <email>tiagoalvescunha@hotmail.com</email></correspondenceTo><linkGroup><link type="toTypesetVersion" href="file:CID.CID323.pdf"></link></linkGroup></publicationMeta><contentMeta><countGroup><count type="figureTotal" number="4"></count><count type="tableTotal" number="1"></count><count type="formulaTotal" number="0"></count><count type="referenceTotal" number="32"></count><count type="wordTotal" number="3303"></count><count type="linksPubMed" number="0"></count><count type="linksCrossRef" number="0"></count></countGroup><titleGroup><title type="main">Comparison of Fit Accuracy between Procera® Custom Abutments and Three Implant Systems</title><title type="shortAuthors">Clinical Implant Dentistry and Related Research, Volume *, Number *, 2010</title><title type="short">Comparison of Fit Accuracy between Procera Custom Abutments and Three Implant Systems</title></titleGroup><creators><creator creatorRole="author" xml:id="cr1" affiliationRef="#a1" corresponding="yes"><personName><givenNames>Tiago</givenNames><familyName>de Morais Alves da Cunha</familyName><degrees>MSCD</degrees></personName></creator><creator creatorRole="author" xml:id="cr2" affiliationRef="#a2"><personName><givenNames>Roberto Paulo Correia</givenNames><familyName>de Araújo</familyName></personName></creator><creator creatorRole="author" xml:id="cr3" affiliationRef="#a3"><personName><givenNames>Paulo Vicente Barbosa</givenNames><familyName>da Rocha</familyName></personName></creator><creator creatorRole="author" xml:id="cr4" affiliationRef="#a4"><personName><givenNames>Rosa Maria Pazos</givenNames><familyName>Amoedo</familyName></personName></creator></creators><affiliationGroup><affiliation xml:id="a1" countryCode="BR"><unparsedAffiliation>Professor, Department of Prosthodontics, School of Dentistry, UNIME, Bahia, Brazil;</unparsedAffiliation></affiliation><affiliation xml:id="a2" countryCode="BR"><unparsedAffiliation>associate professor, Department of Biochemistry, Federal University of Bahia, Brazil;</unparsedAffiliation></affiliation><affiliation xml:id="a3" countryCode="BR"><unparsedAffiliation>adjunct professor of prosthodontics, Federal University of Bahia, Brazil;</unparsedAffiliation></affiliation><affiliation xml:id="a4" countryCode="BR"><unparsedAffiliation>professor, Department of Prosthodontics, School of Dentistry, UNIME, Bahia, Brazil</unparsedAffiliation></affiliation></affiliationGroup><keywordGroup xml:lang="en"><keyword xml:id="k1">dental implants</keyword><keyword xml:id="k2">implant‐supported prosthesis</keyword><keyword xml:id="k3">misfit</keyword><keyword xml:id="k4">prosthodontic planning</keyword></keywordGroup><abstractGroup><abstract type="main" xml:lang="en"><title type="main">ABSTRACT</title><p><b>Background:</b> Although increase of misfit has been reported when associating implant and abutment from different manufacturers, Procera custom abutment has been universally used in clinical practice.</p><p><b>Purpose:</b> The purpose of this investigation was to compare the vertical gap of zirconia Procera® abutment associated with implants from the same manufacturer (Procera manufacturer) and two other implant systems.</p><p><b>Materials and Methods:</b> Twenty‐four zirconia Procera abutments were produced using computer‐assisted design and manufacture and paired with (a) eight MK III, RP 4.1 × 10 mm implants (Nobel Biocare™, Göteborg, Sweden) – GNB group (Nobel Biocare group); (b) eight Try on, 4.1 × 10 mm implants (Sistema de Implantes, São Paulo, Brazil) – ES group (SIN experimental group) ; and (c) eight Master screw, 4.1 × 10 mm implants (Conexão® Sistema de Prótese, São Paulo, Brazil) – EC group (Conexão experimental group). A comparison of the vertical misfit at the implant–abutment interface was taken at six measuring sites on each sample using scanning electron microscopy with a magnification of 408×. One‐way analysis of variance was used to test for differences, and Tukey's test was used for pair‐wise comparison of groups (α = 0.05).</p><p><b>Results:</b> Significant differences relative to average misfit were found when Procera abutments were associated with other implant manufacturers. The ES group and EC group did not differ significantly, but both demonstrated significantly larger average misfit than the GNB group (<i>p</i> = .001). The average misfit was 5.7 µm ± 0.39, 9.53 µm ± 0.52, and 10.62 µm ± 2.16, respectively, for groups GNB, ES, and EC.</p><p><b>Conclusion:</b> The association of Procera zirconia abutment with other implant systems different from its manufacturer demonstrated significant alteration of vertical misfit at implant–abutment interface.</p></abstract></abstractGroup></contentMeta></header></component></istex:document></istex:metadataXml><mods version="3.6"><titleInfo lang="en"><title>Comparison of Fit Accuracy between Procera® Custom Abutments and Three Implant Systems</title></titleInfo><titleInfo type="abbreviated" lang="en"><title>Comparison of Fit Accuracy between Procera Custom Abutments and Three Implant Systems</title></titleInfo><titleInfo type="alternative" contentType="CDATA" lang="en"><title>Comparison of Fit Accuracy between Procera® Custom Abutments and Three Implant Systems</title></titleInfo><name type="personal"><namePart type="given">Tiago</namePart><namePart type="family">de Morais Alves da Cunha</namePart><namePart type="termsOfAddress">MSCD</namePart><affiliation>Professor, Department of Prosthodontics, School of Dentistry, UNIME, Bahia, Brazil;</affiliation><affiliation>E-mail: tiagoalvescunha@hotmail.com</affiliation><role><roleTerm type="text">author</roleTerm></role></name><name type="personal"><namePart type="given">Roberto Paulo Correia</namePart><namePart type="family">de Araújo</namePart><affiliation>associate professor, Department of Biochemistry, Federal University of Bahia, Brazil;</affiliation><role><roleTerm type="text">author</roleTerm></role></name><name type="personal"><namePart type="given">Paulo Vicente Barbosa</namePart><namePart type="family">da Rocha</namePart><affiliation>adjunct professor of prosthodontics, Federal University of Bahia, Brazil;</affiliation><role><roleTerm type="text">author</roleTerm></role></name><name type="personal"><namePart type="given">Rosa Maria Pazos</namePart><namePart type="family">Amoedo</namePart><affiliation>professor, Department of Prosthodontics, School of Dentistry, UNIME, Bahia, Brazil</affiliation><role><roleTerm type="text">author</roleTerm></role></name><typeOfResource>text</typeOfResource><genre type="article" displayLabel="article" authority="ISTEX" authorityURI="https://content-type.data.istex.fr" valueURI="https://content-type.data.istex.fr/ark:/67375/XTP-6N5SZHKN-D">article</genre><originInfo><publisher>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</publisher><place><placeTerm type="text">Oxford, UK</placeTerm></place><dateIssued encoding="w3cdtf">2012-12</dateIssued><copyrightDate encoding="w3cdtf">2012</copyrightDate></originInfo><language><languageTerm type="code" authority="rfc3066">en</languageTerm><languageTerm type="code" authority="iso639-2b">eng</languageTerm></language><physicalDescription><extent unit="figures">4</extent><extent unit="tables">1</extent><extent unit="formulas">0</extent><extent unit="references">32</extent><extent unit="linksCrossRef">0</extent><extent unit="words">3303</extent></physicalDescription><abstract>Background: Although increase of misfit has been reported when associating implant and abutment from different manufacturers, Procera custom abutment has been universally used in clinical practice.</abstract><abstract>Purpose: The purpose of this investigation was to compare the vertical gap of zirconia Procera® abutment associated with implants from the same manufacturer (Procera manufacturer) and two other implant systems.</abstract><abstract>Materials and Methods: Twenty‐four zirconia Procera abutments were produced using computer‐assisted design and manufacture and paired with (a) eight MK III, RP 4.1 × 10 mm implants (Nobel Biocare™, Göteborg, Sweden) – GNB group (Nobel Biocare group); (b) eight Try on, 4.1 × 10 mm implants (Sistema de Implantes, São Paulo, Brazil) – ES group (SIN experimental group) ; and (c) eight Master screw, 4.1 × 10 mm implants (Conexão® Sistema de Prótese, São Paulo, Brazil) – EC group (Conexão experimental group). A comparison of the vertical misfit at the implant–abutment interface was taken at six measuring sites on each sample using scanning electron microscopy with a magnification of 408×. One‐way analysis of variance was used to test for differences, and Tukey's test was used for pair‐wise comparison of groups (α = 0.05).</abstract><abstract>Results: Significant differences relative to average misfit were found when Procera abutments were associated with other implant manufacturers. The ES group and EC group did not differ significantly, but both demonstrated significantly larger average misfit than the GNB group (p = .001). The average misfit was 5.7 µm ± 0.39, 9.53 µm ± 0.52, and 10.62 µm ± 2.16, respectively, for groups GNB, ES, and EC.</abstract><abstract>Conclusion: The association of Procera zirconia abutment with other implant systems different from its manufacturer demonstrated significant alteration of vertical misfit at implant–abutment interface.</abstract><subject lang="en"><genre>keywords</genre><topic>dental implants</topic><topic>implant‐supported prosthesis</topic><topic>misfit</topic><topic>prosthodontic planning</topic></subject><relatedItem type="host"><titleInfo><title>Clinical Implant Dentistry and Related Research</title></titleInfo><genre type="journal" authority="ISTEX" authorityURI="https://publication-type.data.istex.fr" valueURI="https://publication-type.data.istex.fr/ark:/67375/JMC-0GLKJH51-B">journal</genre><subject><genre>article-category</genre><topic>ARTICLE</topic></subject><identifier type="ISSN">1523-0899</identifier><identifier type="eISSN">1708-8208</identifier><identifier type="DOI">10.1111/(ISSN)1708-8208</identifier><identifier type="PublisherID">CID</identifier><part><date>2012</date><detail type="volume"><caption>vol.</caption><number>14</number></detail><detail type="issue"><caption>no.</caption><number>6</number></detail><extent unit="pages"><start>890</start><end>895</end><total>6</total></extent></part></relatedItem><identifier type="istex">CEA615F09F0C926799A741F4F967552A4171A78F</identifier><identifier type="ark">ark:/67375/WNG-XG1DMSVW-L</identifier><identifier type="DOI">10.1111/j.1708-8208.2010.00323.x</identifier><identifier type="ArticleID">CID323</identifier><accessCondition type="use and reproduction" contentType="copyright">Copyright © 2012 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.© 2010 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.</accessCondition><recordInfo><recordContentSource authority="ISTEX" authorityURI="https://loaded-corpus.data.istex.fr" valueURI="https://loaded-corpus.data.istex.fr/ark:/67375/XBH-L0C46X92-X">wiley</recordContentSource><recordOrigin>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</recordOrigin></recordInfo></mods><json:item><extension>json</extension><original>false</original><mimetype>application/json</mimetype><uri>https://api.istex.fr/document/CEA615F09F0C926799A741F4F967552A4171A78F/metadata/json</uri></json:item></metadata><serie></serie></istex></record>Pour manipuler ce document sous Unix (Dilib)
EXPLOR_STEP=$WICRI_ROOT/Wicri/Santé/explor/EdenteV2/Data/Istex/Corpus
HfdSelect -h $EXPLOR_STEP/biblio.hfd -nk 006678 | SxmlIndent | more
Ou
HfdSelect -h $EXPLOR_AREA/Data/Istex/Corpus/biblio.hfd -nk 006678 | SxmlIndent | more
Pour mettre un lien sur cette page dans le réseau Wicri
{{Explor lien
|wiki= Wicri/Santé
|area= EdenteV2
|flux= Istex
|étape= Corpus
|type= RBID
|clé= ISTEX:CEA615F09F0C926799A741F4F967552A4171A78F
|texte= Comparison of Fit Accuracy between Procera® Custom Abutments and Three Implant Systems
}}
| This area was generated with Dilib version V0.6.32. |  |