Randomized Controlled Trial to Compare Two Bone Substitutes in the Treatment of Bony Dehiscences
Identifieur interne : 006618 ( Istex/Corpus ); précédent : 006617; suivant : 006619Randomized Controlled Trial to Compare Two Bone Substitutes in the Treatment of Bony Dehiscences
Auteurs : Nele Van Assche ; Sofie Michels ; Ignace Naert ; Marc QuirynenSource :
- Clinical Implant Dentistry and Related Research [ 1523-0899 ] ; 2013-08.
English descriptors
- KwdEn :
- Abutment, Abutment connection, Abutment installation, Abutment surgery, Alveolar bone, Augmentation, Autogenous, Autogenous bone, Barrier membranes, Bone augmentation, Bone crest, Bone level, Bone levels, Bone loss, Bone regeneration, Bone substitutes, Boneceramic, Bovine bone mineral, Buccal defects, Catholic university leuven, Clin, Clin periodontol, Clinical attachment level, Clinical implant dentistry, Clinical outcomes, Clinical parameters, Clinical trial, Complete closure, Control group, Control implants, Cumulative percentage, Defect, Defect height, Defect reduction, Dehiscence, Dental implants, Early membrane exposure, Edentulous, Edentulous maxilla, Edentulous patients, Experimental study, Full professor, Geistlich, Geistlich group, Gingival recession, Healing period, Horizontal defect depth, Horizontal defect width, Impl, Implant, Implant insertion, Implant installation, Implant placement, Implant shoulder, Implant surface, Institut straumann, Leuven, Maxillofac, Membrane, Natural bone mineral, Nonresorbable membranes, Oral maxillofac implants, Oral maxillofac surg, Periodontol, Pilot study, Present study, Prospective study, Prosthetic research cluster, Randomized, Reference point, Regenerated bone, Regeneration, Resorbable, Resorbable membrane, Rough implant surface, Slactive, Slactive surface, Smooth collar, Standard deviation, Straumann, Straumann boneceramic, Survival rate, Synthetic bone substitute, Systematic review, Test group, Titanium implants, Treatment groups, Vertical defect height, Vertical height.
- Teeft :
- Abutment, Abutment connection, Abutment installation, Abutment surgery, Alveolar bone, Augmentation, Autogenous, Autogenous bone, Barrier membranes, Bone augmentation, Bone crest, Bone level, Bone levels, Bone loss, Bone regeneration, Bone substitutes, Boneceramic, Bovine bone mineral, Buccal defects, Catholic university leuven, Clin, Clin periodontol, Clinical attachment level, Clinical implant dentistry, Clinical outcomes, Clinical parameters, Clinical trial, Complete closure, Control group, Control implants, Cumulative percentage, Defect, Defect height, Defect reduction, Dehiscence, Dental implants, Early membrane exposure, Edentulous, Edentulous maxilla, Edentulous patients, Experimental study, Full professor, Geistlich, Geistlich group, Gingival recession, Healing period, Horizontal defect depth, Horizontal defect width, Impl, Implant, Implant insertion, Implant installation, Implant placement, Implant shoulder, Implant surface, Institut straumann, Leuven, Maxillofac, Membrane, Natural bone mineral, Nonresorbable membranes, Oral maxillofac implants, Oral maxillofac surg, Periodontol, Pilot study, Present study, Prospective study, Prosthetic research cluster, Randomized, Reference point, Regenerated bone, Regeneration, Resorbable, Resorbable membrane, Rough implant surface, Slactive, Slactive surface, Smooth collar, Standard deviation, Straumann, Straumann boneceramic, Survival rate, Synthetic bone substitute, Systematic review, Test group, Titanium implants, Treatment groups, Vertical defect height, Vertical height.
Abstract
Aim: This in vivo split‐mouth randomized controlled trial compared a synthetic bone substitute with a bovine bone mineral to cover bone dehiscences after implant insertion.
Url:
DOI: 10.1111/j.1708-8208.2011.00408.x
Links to Exploration step
ISTEX:CD6EEDCFE2CDC88E363FF767F47C2B2A3A35C4E0Le document en format XML
<record><TEI wicri:istexFullTextTei="biblStruct"><teiHeader><fileDesc><titleStmt><title xml:lang="en">Randomized Controlled Trial to Compare Two Bone Substitutes in the Treatment of Bony Dehiscences</title><author><name sortKey="Van Assche, Nele" sort="Van Assche, Nele" uniqKey="Van Assche N" first="Nele" last="Van Assche">Nele Van Assche</name><affiliation><mods:affiliation>Periodontologist, Department of Periodontology, Faculty of Medicine, Catholic University Leuven, Leuven, Belgium;</mods:affiliation></affiliation></author><author><name sortKey="Michels, Sofie" sort="Michels, Sofie" uniqKey="Michels S" first="Sofie" last="Michels">Sofie Michels</name><affiliation><mods:affiliation>assistant professor, prosthodontist, Department of Prosthetic Dentistry/BIOMAT Research Cluster, Faculty of Medicine, Catholic University Leuven, Leuven, Belgium;</mods:affiliation></affiliation></author><author><name sortKey="Naert, Ignace" sort="Naert, Ignace" uniqKey="Naert I" first="Ignace" last="Naert">Ignace Naert</name><affiliation><mods:affiliation>full professor, prosthodontist, Department of Prosthetic Dentistry/BIOMAT Research Cluster, Faculty of Medicine, Catholic University Leuven, Leuven, Belgium;</mods:affiliation></affiliation></author><author><name sortKey="Quirynen, Marc" sort="Quirynen, Marc" uniqKey="Quirynen M" first="Marc" last="Quirynen">Marc Quirynen</name><affiliation><mods:affiliation>full professor, periodontologist, Department of Periodontology, Faculty of Medicine, Catholic University Leuven, Leuven, Belgium</mods:affiliation></affiliation><affiliation><mods:affiliation>E-mail: marc.quirynen@med.kuleuven.be</mods:affiliation></affiliation></author></titleStmt><publicationStmt><idno type="wicri:source">ISTEX</idno><idno type="RBID">ISTEX:CD6EEDCFE2CDC88E363FF767F47C2B2A3A35C4E0</idno><date when="2013" year="2013">2013</date><idno type="doi">10.1111/j.1708-8208.2011.00408.x</idno><idno type="url">https://api.istex.fr/document/CD6EEDCFE2CDC88E363FF767F47C2B2A3A35C4E0/fulltext/pdf</idno><idno type="wicri:Area/Istex/Corpus">006618</idno><idno type="wicri:explorRef" wicri:stream="Istex" wicri:step="Corpus" wicri:corpus="ISTEX">006618</idno></publicationStmt><sourceDesc><biblStruct><analytic><title level="a" type="main">Randomized Controlled Trial to Compare Two Bone Substitutes in the Treatment of Bony Dehiscences</title><author><name sortKey="Van Assche, Nele" sort="Van Assche, Nele" uniqKey="Van Assche N" first="Nele" last="Van Assche">Nele Van Assche</name><affiliation><mods:affiliation>Periodontologist, Department of Periodontology, Faculty of Medicine, Catholic University Leuven, Leuven, Belgium;</mods:affiliation></affiliation></author><author><name sortKey="Michels, Sofie" sort="Michels, Sofie" uniqKey="Michels S" first="Sofie" last="Michels">Sofie Michels</name><affiliation><mods:affiliation>assistant professor, prosthodontist, Department of Prosthetic Dentistry/BIOMAT Research Cluster, Faculty of Medicine, Catholic University Leuven, Leuven, Belgium;</mods:affiliation></affiliation></author><author><name sortKey="Naert, Ignace" sort="Naert, Ignace" uniqKey="Naert I" first="Ignace" last="Naert">Ignace Naert</name><affiliation><mods:affiliation>full professor, prosthodontist, Department of Prosthetic Dentistry/BIOMAT Research Cluster, Faculty of Medicine, Catholic University Leuven, Leuven, Belgium;</mods:affiliation></affiliation></author><author><name sortKey="Quirynen, Marc" sort="Quirynen, Marc" uniqKey="Quirynen M" first="Marc" last="Quirynen">Marc Quirynen</name><affiliation><mods:affiliation>full professor, periodontologist, Department of Periodontology, Faculty of Medicine, Catholic University Leuven, Leuven, Belgium</mods:affiliation></affiliation><affiliation><mods:affiliation>E-mail: marc.quirynen@med.kuleuven.be</mods:affiliation></affiliation></author></analytic><monogr></monogr><series><title level="j" type="main">Clinical Implant Dentistry and Related Research</title><title level="j" type="alt">CLINICAL IMPLANT DENTISTRY RELATED RESEARCH</title><idno type="ISSN">1523-0899</idno><idno type="eISSN">1708-8208</idno><imprint><biblScope unit="vol">15</biblScope><biblScope unit="issue">4</biblScope><biblScope unit="page" from="558">558</biblScope><biblScope unit="page" to="568">568</biblScope><biblScope unit="page-count">11</biblScope><publisher>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</publisher><pubPlace>Oxford, UK</pubPlace><date type="published" when="2013-08">2013-08</date></imprint><idno type="ISSN">1523-0899</idno></series></biblStruct></sourceDesc><seriesStmt><idno type="ISSN">1523-0899</idno></seriesStmt></fileDesc><profileDesc><textClass><keywords scheme="KwdEn" xml:lang="en"><term>Abutment</term><term>Abutment connection</term><term>Abutment installation</term><term>Abutment surgery</term><term>Alveolar bone</term><term>Augmentation</term><term>Autogenous</term><term>Autogenous bone</term><term>Barrier membranes</term><term>Bone augmentation</term><term>Bone crest</term><term>Bone level</term><term>Bone levels</term><term>Bone loss</term><term>Bone regeneration</term><term>Bone substitutes</term><term>Boneceramic</term><term>Bovine bone mineral</term><term>Buccal defects</term><term>Catholic university leuven</term><term>Clin</term><term>Clin periodontol</term><term>Clinical attachment level</term><term>Clinical implant dentistry</term><term>Clinical outcomes</term><term>Clinical parameters</term><term>Clinical trial</term><term>Complete closure</term><term>Control group</term><term>Control implants</term><term>Cumulative percentage</term><term>Defect</term><term>Defect height</term><term>Defect reduction</term><term>Dehiscence</term><term>Dental implants</term><term>Early membrane exposure</term><term>Edentulous</term><term>Edentulous maxilla</term><term>Edentulous patients</term><term>Experimental study</term><term>Full professor</term><term>Geistlich</term><term>Geistlich group</term><term>Gingival recession</term><term>Healing period</term><term>Horizontal defect depth</term><term>Horizontal defect width</term><term>Impl</term><term>Implant</term><term>Implant insertion</term><term>Implant installation</term><term>Implant placement</term><term>Implant shoulder</term><term>Implant surface</term><term>Institut straumann</term><term>Leuven</term><term>Maxillofac</term><term>Membrane</term><term>Natural bone mineral</term><term>Nonresorbable membranes</term><term>Oral maxillofac implants</term><term>Oral maxillofac surg</term><term>Periodontol</term><term>Pilot study</term><term>Present study</term><term>Prospective study</term><term>Prosthetic research cluster</term><term>Randomized</term><term>Reference point</term><term>Regenerated bone</term><term>Regeneration</term><term>Resorbable</term><term>Resorbable membrane</term><term>Rough implant surface</term><term>Slactive</term><term>Slactive surface</term><term>Smooth collar</term><term>Standard deviation</term><term>Straumann</term><term>Straumann boneceramic</term><term>Survival rate</term><term>Synthetic bone substitute</term><term>Systematic review</term><term>Test group</term><term>Titanium implants</term><term>Treatment groups</term><term>Vertical defect height</term><term>Vertical height</term></keywords><keywords scheme="Teeft" xml:lang="en"><term>Abutment</term><term>Abutment connection</term><term>Abutment installation</term><term>Abutment surgery</term><term>Alveolar bone</term><term>Augmentation</term><term>Autogenous</term><term>Autogenous bone</term><term>Barrier membranes</term><term>Bone augmentation</term><term>Bone crest</term><term>Bone level</term><term>Bone levels</term><term>Bone loss</term><term>Bone regeneration</term><term>Bone substitutes</term><term>Boneceramic</term><term>Bovine bone mineral</term><term>Buccal defects</term><term>Catholic university leuven</term><term>Clin</term><term>Clin periodontol</term><term>Clinical attachment level</term><term>Clinical implant dentistry</term><term>Clinical outcomes</term><term>Clinical parameters</term><term>Clinical trial</term><term>Complete closure</term><term>Control group</term><term>Control implants</term><term>Cumulative percentage</term><term>Defect</term><term>Defect height</term><term>Defect reduction</term><term>Dehiscence</term><term>Dental implants</term><term>Early membrane exposure</term><term>Edentulous</term><term>Edentulous maxilla</term><term>Edentulous patients</term><term>Experimental study</term><term>Full professor</term><term>Geistlich</term><term>Geistlich group</term><term>Gingival recession</term><term>Healing period</term><term>Horizontal defect depth</term><term>Horizontal defect width</term><term>Impl</term><term>Implant</term><term>Implant insertion</term><term>Implant installation</term><term>Implant placement</term><term>Implant shoulder</term><term>Implant surface</term><term>Institut straumann</term><term>Leuven</term><term>Maxillofac</term><term>Membrane</term><term>Natural bone mineral</term><term>Nonresorbable membranes</term><term>Oral maxillofac implants</term><term>Oral maxillofac surg</term><term>Periodontol</term><term>Pilot study</term><term>Present study</term><term>Prospective study</term><term>Prosthetic research cluster</term><term>Randomized</term><term>Reference point</term><term>Regenerated bone</term><term>Regeneration</term><term>Resorbable</term><term>Resorbable membrane</term><term>Rough implant surface</term><term>Slactive</term><term>Slactive surface</term><term>Smooth collar</term><term>Standard deviation</term><term>Straumann</term><term>Straumann boneceramic</term><term>Survival rate</term><term>Synthetic bone substitute</term><term>Systematic review</term><term>Test group</term><term>Titanium implants</term><term>Treatment groups</term><term>Vertical defect height</term><term>Vertical height</term></keywords></textClass></profileDesc></teiHeader><front><div type="abstract">Aim: This in vivo split‐mouth randomized controlled trial compared a synthetic bone substitute with a bovine bone mineral to cover bone dehiscences after implant insertion.</div></front></TEI><istex><corpusName>wiley</corpusName><keywords><teeft><json:string>implant</json:string><json:string>dehiscence</json:string><json:string>clin</json:string><json:string>augmentation</json:string><json:string>abutment</json:string><json:string>bone regeneration</json:string><json:string>straumann</json:string><json:string>autogenous</json:string><json:string>maxillofac</json:string><json:string>leuven</json:string><json:string>autogenous bone</json:string><json:string>straumann boneceramic</json:string><json:string>boneceramic</json:string><json:string>implant shoulder</json:string><json:string>implant placement</json:string><json:string>impl</json:string><json:string>randomized</json:string><json:string>geistlich</json:string><json:string>regeneration</json:string><json:string>oral maxillofac implants</json:string><json:string>resorbable</json:string><json:string>periodontol</json:string><json:string>abutment connection</json:string><json:string>catholic university leuven</json:string><json:string>slactive</json:string><json:string>defect</json:string><json:string>geistlich group</json:string><json:string>vertical height</json:string><json:string>implant surface</json:string><json:string>bone crest</json:string><json:string>dental implants</json:string><json:string>implant installation</json:string><json:string>clinical implant dentistry</json:string><json:string>bone substitutes</json:string><json:string>vertical defect height</json:string><json:string>early membrane exposure</json:string><json:string>institut straumann</json:string><json:string>prospective study</json:string><json:string>oral maxillofac surg</json:string><json:string>clin periodontol</json:string><json:string>rough implant surface</json:string><json:string>present study</json:string><json:string>edentulous</json:string><json:string>experimental study</json:string><json:string>survival rate</json:string><json:string>bone levels</json:string><json:string>bone loss</json:string><json:string>bone level</json:string><json:string>standard deviation</json:string><json:string>reference point</json:string><json:string>edentulous patients</json:string><json:string>titanium implants</json:string><json:string>buccal defects</json:string><json:string>bone augmentation</json:string><json:string>slactive surface</json:string><json:string>resorbable membrane</json:string><json:string>systematic review</json:string><json:string>barrier membranes</json:string><json:string>synthetic bone substitute</json:string><json:string>healing period</json:string><json:string>horizontal defect depth</json:string><json:string>membrane</json:string><json:string>complete closure</json:string><json:string>full professor</json:string><json:string>abutment surgery</json:string><json:string>cumulative percentage</json:string><json:string>natural bone mineral</json:string><json:string>implant insertion</json:string><json:string>clinical attachment level</json:string><json:string>clinical parameters</json:string><json:string>regenerated bone</json:string><json:string>nonresorbable membranes</json:string><json:string>control implants</json:string><json:string>defect height</json:string><json:string>alveolar bone</json:string><json:string>horizontal defect width</json:string><json:string>defect reduction</json:string><json:string>bovine bone mineral</json:string><json:string>gingival recession</json:string><json:string>edentulous maxilla</json:string><json:string>smooth collar</json:string><json:string>prosthetic research cluster</json:string><json:string>treatment groups</json:string><json:string>test group</json:string><json:string>clinical outcomes</json:string><json:string>control group</json:string><json:string>pilot study</json:string><json:string>clinical trial</json:string><json:string>abutment installation</json:string></teeft></keywords><author><json:item><name>Nele Van Assche PhD</name><affiliations><json:string>Periodontologist, Department of Periodontology, Faculty of Medicine, Catholic University Leuven, Leuven, Belgium;</json:string></affiliations></json:item><json:item><name>Sofie Michels</name><affiliations><json:string>assistant professor, prosthodontist, Department of Prosthetic Dentistry/BIOMAT Research Cluster, Faculty of Medicine, Catholic University Leuven, Leuven, Belgium;</json:string></affiliations></json:item><json:item><name>Ignace Naert PhD</name><affiliations><json:string>full professor, prosthodontist, Department of Prosthetic Dentistry/BIOMAT Research Cluster, Faculty of Medicine, Catholic University Leuven, Leuven, Belgium;</json:string></affiliations></json:item><json:item><name>Marc Quirynen PhD</name><affiliations><json:string>full professor, periodontologist, Department of Periodontology, Faculty of Medicine, Catholic University Leuven, Leuven, Belgium</json:string><json:string>E-mail: marc.quirynen@med.kuleuven.be</json:string></affiliations></json:item></author><subject><json:item><lang><json:string>eng</json:string></lang><value>bone augmentation</value></json:item><json:item><lang><json:string>eng</json:string></lang><value>guided bone regeneration</value></json:item><json:item><lang><json:string>eng</json:string></lang><value>maxilla</value></json:item><json:item><lang><json:string>eng</json:string></lang><value>SLActive</value></json:item><json:item><lang><json:string>eng</json:string></lang><value>two stage</value></json:item></subject><articleId><json:string>CID408</json:string></articleId><arkIstex>ark:/67375/WNG-6D5JGHTQ-V</arkIstex><language><json:string>eng</json:string></language><originalGenre><json:string>article</json:string></originalGenre><abstract>Aim: This in vivo split‐mouth randomized controlled trial compared a synthetic bone substitute with a bovine bone mineral to cover bone dehiscences after implant insertion.</abstract><qualityIndicators><refBibsNative>true</refBibsNative><abstractWordCount>25</abstractWordCount><abstractCharCount>172</abstractCharCount><keywordCount>5</keywordCount><score>7.3</score><pdfWordCount>5115</pdfWordCount><pdfCharCount>32908</pdfCharCount><pdfVersion>1.3</pdfVersion><pdfPageCount>11</pdfPageCount><pdfPageSize>585 x 783 pts</pdfPageSize></qualityIndicators><title>Randomized Controlled Trial to Compare Two Bone Substitutes in the Treatment of Bony Dehiscences</title><pmid><json:string>22236044</json:string></pmid><genre><json:string>article</json:string></genre><host><title>Clinical Implant Dentistry and Related Research</title><language><json:string>unknown</json:string></language><doi><json:string>10.1111/(ISSN)1708-8208</json:string></doi><issn><json:string>1523-0899</json:string></issn><eissn><json:string>1708-8208</json:string></eissn><publisherId><json:string>CID</json:string></publisherId><volume>15</volume><issue>4</issue><pages><first>558</first><last>568</last><total>11</total></pages><genre><json:string>journal</json:string></genre><subject><json:item><value>ARTICLE</value></json:item></subject></host><namedEntities><unitex><date><json:string>2013</json:string></date><geogName></geogName><orgName><json:string>Wiley Periodicals, Inc.</json:string><json:string>Related Research, Volume</json:string><json:string>Department of Periodontology, Catholic University Leuven, Kapucijnenvoer</json:string><json:string>Department of Periodontology, Faculty of Medicine, Catholic University Leuven, Leuven, Belgium Reprint</json:string><json:string>Department of Prosthetic Dentistry/BIOMAT Research Cluster, Faculty of Medicine, Catholic University Leuven, Leuven, Belgium</json:string><json:string>Integration Diagnostics</json:string><json:string>XPC Instruments</json:string><json:string>Catholic University</json:string><json:string>University of Bern</json:string><json:string>GC America Inc.</json:string><json:string>Working Group 3</json:string><json:string>University of Bern, Switzerland</json:string></orgName><orgName_funder></orgName_funder><orgName_provider></orgName_provider><persName><json:string>Systematic</json:string><json:string>Marc Quirynen</json:string><json:string>Buser</json:string><json:string>Rigmor Persson</json:string><json:string>Jung</json:string><json:string>Number</json:string><json:string>Dahlin</json:string><json:string>Manfred Klasser</json:string><json:string>Ignace Naert</json:string><json:string>Zitzmann</json:string></persName><placeName><json:string>IL</json:string><json:string>Switzerland</json:string><json:string>Germany</json:string><json:string>Elgin</json:string><json:string>Alsip</json:string><json:string>USA</json:string><json:string>Basel</json:string><json:string>Chicago</json:string><json:string>Leuven</json:string><json:string>Italy</json:string><json:string>Sweden</json:string><json:string>Belgium</json:string></placeName><ref_url></ref_url><ref_bibl></ref_bibl><bibl></bibl></unitex></namedEntities><ark><json:string>ark:/67375/WNG-6D5JGHTQ-V</json:string></ark><categories><wos><json:string>1 - science</json:string><json:string>2 - dentistry, oral surgery & medicine</json:string></wos><scienceMetrix><json:string>1 - health sciences</json:string><json:string>2 - clinical medicine</json:string><json:string>3 - dentistry</json:string></scienceMetrix><scopus><json:string>1 - Health Sciences</json:string><json:string>2 - Dentistry</json:string><json:string>3 - General Dentistry</json:string><json:string>1 - Health Sciences</json:string><json:string>2 - Dentistry</json:string><json:string>3 - Oral Surgery</json:string></scopus></categories><publicationDate>2013</publicationDate><copyrightDate>2013</copyrightDate><doi><json:string>10.1111/j.1708-8208.2011.00408.x</json:string></doi><id>CD6EEDCFE2CDC88E363FF767F47C2B2A3A35C4E0</id><score>1</score><fulltext><json:item><extension>pdf</extension><original>true</original><mimetype>application/pdf</mimetype><uri>https://api.istex.fr/document/CD6EEDCFE2CDC88E363FF767F47C2B2A3A35C4E0/fulltext/pdf</uri></json:item><json:item><extension>zip</extension><original>false</original><mimetype>application/zip</mimetype><uri>https://api.istex.fr/document/CD6EEDCFE2CDC88E363FF767F47C2B2A3A35C4E0/fulltext/zip</uri></json:item><istex:fulltextTEI uri="https://api.istex.fr/document/CD6EEDCFE2CDC88E363FF767F47C2B2A3A35C4E0/fulltext/tei"><teiHeader><fileDesc><titleStmt><title level="a" type="main">Randomized Controlled Trial to Compare Two Bone Substitutes in the Treatment of Bony Dehiscences</title></titleStmt><publicationStmt><authority>ISTEX</authority><publisher>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</publisher><pubPlace>Oxford, UK</pubPlace><availability><licence>© 2012 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.</licence></availability><date type="published" when="2013-08"></date></publicationStmt><notesStmt><note type="content-type" subtype="article" source="article" scheme="https://content-type.data.istex.fr/ark:/67375/XTP-6N5SZHKN-D">article</note><note type="publication-type" subtype="journal" scheme="https://publication-type.data.istex.fr/ark:/67375/JMC-0GLKJH51-B">journal</note></notesStmt><sourceDesc><biblStruct type="article"><analytic><title level="a" type="main">Randomized Controlled Trial to Compare Two Bone Substitutes in the Treatment of Bony Dehiscences</title><title level="a" type="short">Treatment of Dehiscence Along Implant</title><author xml:id="author-0000"><persName><forename type="first">Nele</forename><surname>Van Assche</surname><roleName type="degree">PhD</roleName></persName><affiliation>Periodontologist, Department of Periodontology, Faculty of Medicine, Catholic University Leuven, Leuven, Belgium;<address><country key="BE"></country></address></affiliation></author><author xml:id="author-0001"><persName><forename type="first">Sofie</forename><surname>Michels</surname></persName><affiliation>assistant professor, prosthodontist, Department of Prosthetic Dentistry/BIOMAT Research Cluster, Faculty of Medicine, Catholic University Leuven, Leuven, Belgium;<address><country key="BE"></country></address></affiliation></author><author xml:id="author-0002"><persName><forename type="first">Ignace</forename><surname>Naert</surname><roleName type="degree">PhD</roleName></persName><affiliation>full professor, prosthodontist, Department of Prosthetic Dentistry/BIOMAT Research Cluster, Faculty of Medicine, Catholic University Leuven, Leuven, Belgium;<address><country key="BE"></country></address></affiliation></author><author xml:id="author-0003" role="corresp"><persName><forename type="first">Marc</forename><surname>Quirynen</surname><roleName type="degree">PhD</roleName></persName><affiliation>full professor, periodontologist, Department of Periodontology, Faculty of Medicine, Catholic University Leuven, Leuven, Belgium<address><country key="BE"></country></address></affiliation><affiliation>Professor Marc Quirynen, Department of Periodontology, Catholic University Leuven, Kapucijnenvoer 7, Leuven 3000, Belgium; e‐mail: marc.quirynen@med.kuleuven.be</affiliation></author><idno type="istex">CD6EEDCFE2CDC88E363FF767F47C2B2A3A35C4E0</idno><idno type="ark">ark:/67375/WNG-6D5JGHTQ-V</idno><idno type="DOI">10.1111/j.1708-8208.2011.00408.x</idno><idno type="unit">CID408</idno><idno type="toTypesetVersion">file:CID.CID408.pdf</idno></analytic><monogr><title level="j" type="main">Clinical Implant Dentistry and Related Research</title><title level="j" type="alt">CLINICAL IMPLANT DENTISTRY RELATED RESEARCH</title><idno type="pISSN">1523-0899</idno><idno type="eISSN">1708-8208</idno><idno type="book-DOI">10.1111/(ISSN)1708-8208</idno><idno type="book-part-DOI">10.1111/cid.2013.15.issue-4</idno><idno type="product">CID</idno><idno type="publisherDivision">ST</idno><imprint><biblScope unit="vol">15</biblScope><biblScope unit="issue">4</biblScope><biblScope unit="page" from="558">558</biblScope><biblScope unit="page" to="568">568</biblScope><biblScope unit="page-count">11</biblScope><publisher>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</publisher><pubPlace>Oxford, UK</pubPlace><date type="published" when="2013-08"></date></imprint></monogr></biblStruct></sourceDesc></fileDesc><profileDesc><abstract xml:lang="en" style="main"><head>ABSTRACT</head><p><hi rend="bold">Aim:</hi> This in vivo split‐mouth randomized controlled trial compared a synthetic bone substitute with a bovine bone mineral to cover bone dehiscences after implant insertion.</p><p><hi rend="bold">Materials and Methods:</hi> Fourteen patients received four to six implants to support an overdenture. Two comparable dehiscences within the same patient were first covered with a layer of autogenous bone, followed by a layer of either Bio‐Oss® (group 1; Geistlich Pharma AG, Wolhusen, Switzerland) or Straumann BoneCeramic® (group 2; Institut Straumann AG, Basel, Switzerland) and sealed by a resorbable membrane. The change in vertical dimension of the defect was measured at implant placement and at abutment connection (6.5 months). Clinical and radiological parameters were evaluated up to 1 year of loading.</p><p><hi rend="bold">Results:</hi> The vertical size of the defect at surgery was 6.4 ± 1.6 mm for group 1 and 6.4 ± 2.2 mm for group 2 sites, measured from the implant shoulder. After 6.5 months, the depth of the defect was reduced to 1.5 ± 1.2 mm and 1.9 ± 1.2 mm for group 1 and group 2 sites, respectively (<hi rend="italic">p</hi> > 0.05). No implants failed during follow‐up. Mean marginal bone loss over the SLActive surface was 0.94 mm (group 1), 0.81 mm (group 2), and 0.93 mm (group 3, no dehiscence) after 1 year of loading.</p><p><hi rend="bold">Conclusion:</hi> Both bone substitutes behaved equally effectively.</p></abstract><textClass><keywords xml:lang="en"><term xml:id="k1">bone augmentation</term><term xml:id="k2">guided bone regeneration</term><term xml:id="k3">maxilla</term><term xml:id="k4">SLActive</term><term xml:id="k5">two stage</term></keywords><keywords rend="tocHeading1"><term>ARTICLES</term></keywords><keywords rend="articleCategory"><term>ARTICLE</term></keywords></textClass><langUsage><language ident="en"></language></langUsage></profileDesc></teiHeader></istex:fulltextTEI><json:item><extension>txt</extension><original>false</original><mimetype>text/plain</mimetype><uri>https://api.istex.fr/document/CD6EEDCFE2CDC88E363FF767F47C2B2A3A35C4E0/fulltext/txt</uri></json:item></fulltext><metadata><istex:metadataXml wicri:clean="Wiley, elements deleted: body"><istex:xmlDeclaration>version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" standalone="yes"</istex:xmlDeclaration><istex:document><component version="2.0" type="serialArticle" xml:lang="en"><header><publicationMeta level="product"><publisherInfo><publisherName>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</publisherName><publisherLoc>Oxford, UK</publisherLoc></publisherInfo><doi origin="wiley" registered="yes">10.1111/(ISSN)1708-8208</doi><issn type="print">1523-0899</issn><issn type="electronic">1708-8208</issn><idGroup><id type="product" value="CID"></id><id type="publisherDivision" value="ST"></id></idGroup><titleGroup><title type="main" sort="CLINICAL IMPLANT DENTISTRY RELATED RESEARCH">Clinical Implant Dentistry and Related Research</title></titleGroup></publicationMeta><publicationMeta level="part" position="08104"><doi>10.1111/cid.2013.15.issue-4</doi><copyright ownership="publisher">Copyright © 2013 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.</copyright><numberingGroup><numbering number="15" type="journalVolume">15</numbering><numbering type="journalIssue">4</numbering></numberingGroup><coverDate startDate="2013-08">August 2013</coverDate></publicationMeta><publicationMeta level="unit" type="article" position="100" status="forIssue"><doi origin="wiley">10.1111/j.1708-8208.2011.00408.x</doi><idGroup><id type="unit" value="CID408"></id></idGroup><countGroup><count type="pageTotal" number="11"></count></countGroup><titleGroup><title type="tocHeading1">ARTICLES</title><title type="articleCategory">ARTICLE</title></titleGroup><copyright>© 2012 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.</copyright><eventGroup><event type="xmlConverted" agent="Converter:BPG_TO_WML3G version:3.2.3 mode:FullText" date="2013-07-28"></event><event date="2013-07-29" type="xmlCorrected"></event><event type="publishedOnlineEarlyUnpaginated" date="2012-01-11"></event><event type="firstOnline" date="2012-01-11"></event><event type="publishedOnlineFinalForm" date="2013-08-01"></event><event type="xmlConverted" agent="Converter:WILEY_ML3G_TO_WILEY_ML3GV2 version:3.8.8" date="2014-01-15"></event><event type="xmlConverted" agent="Converter:WML3G_To_WML3G version:4.6.4 mode:FullText" date="2015-10-01"></event></eventGroup><numberingGroup><numbering type="pageFirst">558</numbering><numbering type="pageLast">568</numbering></numberingGroup><correspondenceTo>Professor Marc Quirynen, Department of Periodontology, Catholic University Leuven, Kapucijnenvoer 7, Leuven 3000, Belgium; e‐mail: <email>marc.quirynen@med.kuleuven.be</email></correspondenceTo><linkGroup><link type="toTypesetVersion" href="file:CID.CID408.pdf"></link></linkGroup></publicationMeta><contentMeta><countGroup><count type="figureTotal" number="2"></count><count type="tableTotal" number="5"></count><count type="formulaTotal" number="0"></count><count type="referenceTotal" number="42"></count><count type="wordTotal" number="5956"></count><count type="linksPubMed" number="0"></count><count type="linksCrossRef" number="0"></count></countGroup><titleGroup><title type="main">Randomized Controlled Trial to Compare Two Bone Substitutes in the Treatment of Bony Dehiscences</title><title type="shortAuthors">Clinical Implant Dentistry and Related Research, Volume *, Number *, 2012</title><title type="short">Treatment of Dehiscence Along Implant</title></titleGroup><creators><creator creatorRole="author" xml:id="cr1" affiliationRef="#a1"><personName><givenNames>Nele</givenNames><familyName>Van Assche</familyName><degrees>PhD</degrees></personName></creator><creator creatorRole="author" xml:id="cr2" affiliationRef="#a2"><personName><givenNames>Sofie</givenNames><familyName>Michels</familyName></personName></creator><creator creatorRole="author" xml:id="cr3" affiliationRef="#a3"><personName><givenNames>Ignace</givenNames><familyName>Naert</familyName><degrees>PhD</degrees></personName></creator><creator creatorRole="author" xml:id="cr4" affiliationRef="#a4" corresponding="yes"><personName><givenNames>Marc</givenNames><familyName>Quirynen</familyName><degrees>PhD</degrees></personName></creator></creators><affiliationGroup><affiliation xml:id="a1" countryCode="BE"><unparsedAffiliation>Periodontologist, Department of Periodontology, Faculty of Medicine, Catholic University Leuven, Leuven, Belgium;</unparsedAffiliation></affiliation><affiliation xml:id="a2" countryCode="BE"><unparsedAffiliation>assistant professor, prosthodontist, Department of Prosthetic Dentistry/BIOMAT Research Cluster, Faculty of Medicine, Catholic University Leuven, Leuven, Belgium;</unparsedAffiliation></affiliation><affiliation xml:id="a3" countryCode="BE"><unparsedAffiliation>full professor, prosthodontist, Department of Prosthetic Dentistry/BIOMAT Research Cluster, Faculty of Medicine, Catholic University Leuven, Leuven, Belgium;</unparsedAffiliation></affiliation><affiliation xml:id="a4" countryCode="BE"><unparsedAffiliation>full professor, periodontologist, Department of Periodontology, Faculty of Medicine, Catholic University Leuven, Leuven, Belgium</unparsedAffiliation></affiliation></affiliationGroup><keywordGroup xml:lang="en"><keyword xml:id="k1">bone augmentation</keyword><keyword xml:id="k2">guided bone regeneration</keyword><keyword xml:id="k3">maxilla</keyword><keyword xml:id="k4">SLActive</keyword><keyword xml:id="k5">two stage</keyword></keywordGroup><abstractGroup><abstract type="main" xml:lang="en"><title type="main">ABSTRACT</title><p><b>Aim:</b> This in vivo split‐mouth randomized controlled trial compared a synthetic bone substitute with a bovine bone mineral to cover bone dehiscences after implant insertion.</p><p><b>Materials and Methods:</b> Fourteen patients received four to six implants to support an overdenture. Two comparable dehiscences within the same patient were first covered with a layer of autogenous bone, followed by a layer of either Bio‐Oss® (group 1; Geistlich Pharma AG, Wolhusen, Switzerland) or Straumann BoneCeramic® (group 2; Institut Straumann AG, Basel, Switzerland) and sealed by a resorbable membrane. The change in vertical dimension of the defect was measured at implant placement and at abutment connection (6.5 months). Clinical and radiological parameters were evaluated up to 1 year of loading.</p><p><b>Results:</b> The vertical size of the defect at surgery was 6.4 ± 1.6 mm for group 1 and 6.4 ± 2.2 mm for group 2 sites, measured from the implant shoulder. After 6.5 months, the depth of the defect was reduced to 1.5 ± 1.2 mm and 1.9 ± 1.2 mm for group 1 and group 2 sites, respectively (<i>p</i> > 0.05). No implants failed during follow‐up. Mean marginal bone loss over the SLActive surface was 0.94 mm (group 1), 0.81 mm (group 2), and 0.93 mm (group 3, no dehiscence) after 1 year of loading.</p><p><b>Conclusion:</b> Both bone substitutes behaved equally effectively.</p></abstract></abstractGroup></contentMeta><noteGroup><note xml:id="fn5"><p>Source of funding: This research was partially sponsored by Institut Straumann AG, Basel, Switzerland, and the Department of Periodontology, Catholic University Leuven, Belgium.</p></note></noteGroup></header></component></istex:document></istex:metadataXml><mods version="3.6"><titleInfo lang="en"><title>Randomized Controlled Trial to Compare Two Bone Substitutes in the Treatment of Bony Dehiscences</title></titleInfo><titleInfo type="abbreviated" lang="en"><title>Treatment of Dehiscence Along Implant</title></titleInfo><titleInfo type="alternative" contentType="CDATA" lang="en"><title>Randomized Controlled Trial to Compare Two Bone Substitutes in the Treatment of Bony Dehiscences</title></titleInfo><name type="personal"><namePart type="given">Nele</namePart><namePart type="family">Van Assche</namePart><namePart type="termsOfAddress">PhD</namePart><affiliation>Periodontologist, Department of Periodontology, Faculty of Medicine, Catholic University Leuven, Leuven, Belgium;</affiliation><role><roleTerm type="text">author</roleTerm></role></name><name type="personal"><namePart type="given">Sofie</namePart><namePart type="family">Michels</namePart><affiliation>assistant professor, prosthodontist, Department of Prosthetic Dentistry/BIOMAT Research Cluster, Faculty of Medicine, Catholic University Leuven, Leuven, Belgium;</affiliation><role><roleTerm type="text">author</roleTerm></role></name><name type="personal"><namePart type="given">Ignace</namePart><namePart type="family">Naert</namePart><namePart type="termsOfAddress">PhD</namePart><affiliation>full professor, prosthodontist, Department of Prosthetic Dentistry/BIOMAT Research Cluster, Faculty of Medicine, Catholic University Leuven, Leuven, Belgium;</affiliation><role><roleTerm type="text">author</roleTerm></role></name><name type="personal"><namePart type="given">Marc</namePart><namePart type="family">Quirynen</namePart><namePart type="termsOfAddress">PhD</namePart><affiliation>full professor, periodontologist, Department of Periodontology, Faculty of Medicine, Catholic University Leuven, Leuven, Belgium</affiliation><affiliation>E-mail: marc.quirynen@med.kuleuven.be</affiliation><role><roleTerm type="text">author</roleTerm></role></name><typeOfResource>text</typeOfResource><genre type="article" displayLabel="article" authority="ISTEX" authorityURI="https://content-type.data.istex.fr" valueURI="https://content-type.data.istex.fr/ark:/67375/XTP-6N5SZHKN-D">article</genre><originInfo><publisher>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</publisher><place><placeTerm type="text">Oxford, UK</placeTerm></place><dateIssued encoding="w3cdtf">2013-08</dateIssued><copyrightDate encoding="w3cdtf">2013</copyrightDate></originInfo><language><languageTerm type="code" authority="rfc3066">en</languageTerm><languageTerm type="code" authority="iso639-2b">eng</languageTerm></language><physicalDescription><extent unit="figures">2</extent><extent unit="tables">5</extent><extent unit="formulas">0</extent><extent unit="references">42</extent><extent unit="linksCrossRef">0</extent><extent unit="words">5956</extent></physicalDescription><abstract>Aim: This in vivo split‐mouth randomized controlled trial compared a synthetic bone substitute with a bovine bone mineral to cover bone dehiscences after implant insertion.</abstract><abstract>Materials and Methods: Fourteen patients received four to six implants to support an overdenture. Two comparable dehiscences within the same patient were first covered with a layer of autogenous bone, followed by a layer of either Bio‐Oss® (group 1; Geistlich Pharma AG, Wolhusen, Switzerland) or Straumann BoneCeramic® (group 2; Institut Straumann AG, Basel, Switzerland) and sealed by a resorbable membrane. The change in vertical dimension of the defect was measured at implant placement and at abutment connection (6.5 months). Clinical and radiological parameters were evaluated up to 1 year of loading.</abstract><abstract>Results: The vertical size of the defect at surgery was 6.4 ± 1.6 mm for group 1 and 6.4 ± 2.2 mm for group 2 sites, measured from the implant shoulder. After 6.5 months, the depth of the defect was reduced to 1.5 ± 1.2 mm and 1.9 ± 1.2 mm for group 1 and group 2 sites, respectively (p > 0.05). No implants failed during follow‐up. Mean marginal bone loss over the SLActive surface was 0.94 mm (group 1), 0.81 mm (group 2), and 0.93 mm (group 3, no dehiscence) after 1 year of loading.</abstract><abstract>Conclusion: Both bone substitutes behaved equally effectively.</abstract><subject lang="en"><genre>keywords</genre><topic>bone augmentation</topic><topic>guided bone regeneration</topic><topic>maxilla</topic><topic>SLActive</topic><topic>two stage</topic></subject><relatedItem type="host"><titleInfo><title>Clinical Implant Dentistry and Related Research</title></titleInfo><genre type="journal" authority="ISTEX" authorityURI="https://publication-type.data.istex.fr" valueURI="https://publication-type.data.istex.fr/ark:/67375/JMC-0GLKJH51-B">journal</genre><subject><genre>article-category</genre><topic>ARTICLE</topic></subject><identifier type="ISSN">1523-0899</identifier><identifier type="eISSN">1708-8208</identifier><identifier type="DOI">10.1111/(ISSN)1708-8208</identifier><identifier type="PublisherID">CID</identifier><part><date>2013</date><detail type="volume"><caption>vol.</caption><number>15</number></detail><detail type="issue"><caption>no.</caption><number>4</number></detail><extent unit="pages"><start>558</start><end>568</end><total>11</total></extent></part></relatedItem><identifier type="istex">CD6EEDCFE2CDC88E363FF767F47C2B2A3A35C4E0</identifier><identifier type="ark">ark:/67375/WNG-6D5JGHTQ-V</identifier><identifier type="DOI">10.1111/j.1708-8208.2011.00408.x</identifier><identifier type="ArticleID">CID408</identifier><accessCondition type="use and reproduction" contentType="copyright">Copyright © 2013 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.© 2012 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.</accessCondition><recordInfo><recordContentSource authority="ISTEX" authorityURI="https://loaded-corpus.data.istex.fr" valueURI="https://loaded-corpus.data.istex.fr/ark:/67375/XBH-L0C46X92-X">wiley</recordContentSource><recordOrigin>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</recordOrigin></recordInfo></mods><json:item><extension>json</extension><original>false</original><mimetype>application/json</mimetype><uri>https://api.istex.fr/document/CD6EEDCFE2CDC88E363FF767F47C2B2A3A35C4E0/metadata/json</uri></json:item></metadata><serie></serie></istex></record>Pour manipuler ce document sous Unix (Dilib)
EXPLOR_STEP=$WICRI_ROOT/Wicri/Santé/explor/EdenteV2/Data/Istex/Corpus
HfdSelect -h $EXPLOR_STEP/biblio.hfd -nk 006618 | SxmlIndent | more
Ou
HfdSelect -h $EXPLOR_AREA/Data/Istex/Corpus/biblio.hfd -nk 006618 | SxmlIndent | more
Pour mettre un lien sur cette page dans le réseau Wicri
{{Explor lien
|wiki= Wicri/Santé
|area= EdenteV2
|flux= Istex
|étape= Corpus
|type= RBID
|clé= ISTEX:CD6EEDCFE2CDC88E363FF767F47C2B2A3A35C4E0
|texte= Randomized Controlled Trial to Compare Two Bone Substitutes in the Treatment of Bony Dehiscences
}}
| This area was generated with Dilib version V0.6.32. |  |