Patient satisfaction and chewing ability with implant-retained mandibular overdentures: A comparison with new complete dentures with or without preprosthetic surgery
Identifieur interne : 006557 ( Istex/Corpus ); précédent : 006556; suivant : 006558Patient satisfaction and chewing ability with implant-retained mandibular overdentures: A comparison with new complete dentures with or without preprosthetic surgery
Auteurs : E. M Boerrigter ; B. Stegenga ; G. M Raghoebar ; G. BoeringSource :
- Journal of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery [ 0278-2391 ] ; 1995.
English descriptors
- KwdEn :
- Ability questionnaire, Ability questionnaires, Baseline data, Better scores, Clinical trial, Complaints questionnaire, Complete dentures, Control group, Dental implants, Denture, Denture complaints, Denture satisfaction, Edentulous, Edentulous patients, Full dentures, Functional complaints, Functional problems, Groningen, Hard food, Healing period, Implant, Lateral cephalogram, Lower denture, Mandible, Mandibular, Maxillofac, Maxillofacial, Maxillofacial prosthodontics, Maxillofacial surgery, Neutral space, Oral maxillofac implants, Osseointegrated, Osseointegrated implants, Overall denture satisfaction rate, Overall denture satisfaction rating, Overdenture, Overdentures, Patient satisfaction, Preprosthetic, Preprosthetic surgery, Prosthet dent, Rating scale, Satisfaction rate, Soft food, Surgical groups, Tough food, University hospital groningen, Upper denture.
- Teeft :
- Ability questionnaire, Ability questionnaires, Baseline data, Better scores, Clinical trial, Complaints questionnaire, Complete dentures, Control group, Dental implants, Denture, Denture complaints, Denture satisfaction, Edentulous, Edentulous patients, Full dentures, Functional complaints, Functional problems, Groningen, Hard food, Healing period, Implant, Lateral cephalogram, Lower denture, Mandible, Mandibular, Maxillofac, Maxillofacial, Maxillofacial prosthodontics, Maxillofacial surgery, Neutral space, Oral maxillofac implants, Osseointegrated, Osseointegrated implants, Overall denture satisfaction rate, Overall denture satisfaction rating, Overdenture, Overdentures, Patient satisfaction, Preprosthetic, Preprosthetic surgery, Prosthet dent, Rating scale, Satisfaction rate, Soft food, Surgical groups, Tough food, University hospital groningen, Upper denture.
Abstract
Abstract: Purpose: The objective of this study was to compare denture satisfaction and chewing ability of edentulous patients treated with dental implant-retained overdentures or with full dentures with or without previous preprosthetic surgery. Patients and Methods: This study was a controlled clinical trial. Thirty-eight men and 52 women participated in the study. The mean height of the anterior mandible was 21 mm (range, 16 to 25 mm), measured on a lateral cephalometric radiograph. The subjects were randomly assigned to the three treatment modalities. The main outcome measures were denture satisfaction and chewing ability, which were assessed using questionnaires focusing on denturerelated complaints and the ability to chew different types of food, and an overall denture satisfaction score. Results: Based on the baseline data from the “denture complaints” and “chewing ability” questionnaires, nine interpretable factors could be extracted. Two factors did not vary following treatment and were excluded from the outcome analysis. At the 1-year evaluation five of seven factors showed significantly better scores for the two surgical groups than for the control group. The same was found for the overall denture satisfaction rate. Conclusion: Overdentures retained by dental implants or complete dentures made after a vestibuloplasty and deepening of the floor of the mouth provide a more satisfactory solution for denture-related problems than complete dentures alone. For the scale “functional complaints lower denture,” the overdenture group showed even a significantly better score than the preprosthetic surgery group.
Url:
DOI: 10.1016/0278-2391(95)90627-4
Links to Exploration step
ISTEX:CC505B836C06289DD1CE0132658E66A447D59F78Le document en format XML
<record><TEI wicri:istexFullTextTei="biblStruct"><teiHeader><fileDesc><titleStmt><title>Patient satisfaction and chewing ability with implant-retained mandibular overdentures: A comparison with new complete dentures with or without preprosthetic surgery</title><author><name sortKey="Boerrigter, E M" sort="Boerrigter, E M" uniqKey="Boerrigter E" first="E. M" last="Boerrigter">E. M Boerrigter</name></author><author><name sortKey="Stegenga, B" sort="Stegenga, B" uniqKey="Stegenga B" first="B" last="Stegenga">B. Stegenga</name></author><author><name sortKey="Raghoebar, G M" sort="Raghoebar, G M" uniqKey="Raghoebar G" first="G. M" last="Raghoebar">G. M Raghoebar</name></author><author><name sortKey="Boering, G" sort="Boering, G" uniqKey="Boering G" first="G" last="Boering">G. Boering</name></author></titleStmt><publicationStmt><idno type="wicri:source">ISTEX</idno><idno type="RBID">ISTEX:CC505B836C06289DD1CE0132658E66A447D59F78</idno><date when="1995" year="1995">1995</date><idno type="doi">10.1016/0278-2391(95)90627-4</idno><idno type="url">https://api.istex.fr/document/CC505B836C06289DD1CE0132658E66A447D59F78/fulltext/pdf</idno><idno type="wicri:Area/Istex/Corpus">006557</idno><idno type="wicri:explorRef" wicri:stream="Istex" wicri:step="Corpus" wicri:corpus="ISTEX">006557</idno></publicationStmt><sourceDesc><biblStruct><analytic><title level="a">Patient satisfaction and chewing ability with implant-retained mandibular overdentures: A comparison with new complete dentures with or without preprosthetic surgery</title><author><name sortKey="Boerrigter, E M" sort="Boerrigter, E M" uniqKey="Boerrigter E" first="E. M" last="Boerrigter">E. M Boerrigter</name></author><author><name sortKey="Stegenga, B" sort="Stegenga, B" uniqKey="Stegenga B" first="B" last="Stegenga">B. Stegenga</name></author><author><name sortKey="Raghoebar, G M" sort="Raghoebar, G M" uniqKey="Raghoebar G" first="G. M" last="Raghoebar">G. M Raghoebar</name></author><author><name sortKey="Boering, G" sort="Boering, G" uniqKey="Boering G" first="G" last="Boering">G. Boering</name></author></analytic><monogr></monogr><series><title level="j">Journal of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery</title><title level="j" type="abbrev">YJOMS</title><idno type="ISSN">0278-2391</idno><imprint><publisher>ELSEVIER</publisher><date type="published" when="1995">1995</date><biblScope unit="volume">53</biblScope><biblScope unit="issue">10</biblScope><biblScope unit="page" from="1167">1167</biblScope><biblScope unit="page" to="1173">1173</biblScope></imprint><idno type="ISSN">0278-2391</idno></series></biblStruct></sourceDesc><seriesStmt><idno type="ISSN">0278-2391</idno></seriesStmt></fileDesc><profileDesc><textClass><keywords scheme="KwdEn" xml:lang="en"><term>Ability questionnaire</term><term>Ability questionnaires</term><term>Baseline data</term><term>Better scores</term><term>Clinical trial</term><term>Complaints questionnaire</term><term>Complete dentures</term><term>Control group</term><term>Dental implants</term><term>Denture</term><term>Denture complaints</term><term>Denture satisfaction</term><term>Edentulous</term><term>Edentulous patients</term><term>Full dentures</term><term>Functional complaints</term><term>Functional problems</term><term>Groningen</term><term>Hard food</term><term>Healing period</term><term>Implant</term><term>Lateral cephalogram</term><term>Lower denture</term><term>Mandible</term><term>Mandibular</term><term>Maxillofac</term><term>Maxillofacial</term><term>Maxillofacial prosthodontics</term><term>Maxillofacial surgery</term><term>Neutral space</term><term>Oral maxillofac implants</term><term>Osseointegrated</term><term>Osseointegrated implants</term><term>Overall denture satisfaction rate</term><term>Overall denture satisfaction rating</term><term>Overdenture</term><term>Overdentures</term><term>Patient satisfaction</term><term>Preprosthetic</term><term>Preprosthetic surgery</term><term>Prosthet dent</term><term>Rating scale</term><term>Satisfaction rate</term><term>Soft food</term><term>Surgical groups</term><term>Tough food</term><term>University hospital groningen</term><term>Upper denture</term></keywords><keywords scheme="Teeft" xml:lang="en"><term>Ability questionnaire</term><term>Ability questionnaires</term><term>Baseline data</term><term>Better scores</term><term>Clinical trial</term><term>Complaints questionnaire</term><term>Complete dentures</term><term>Control group</term><term>Dental implants</term><term>Denture</term><term>Denture complaints</term><term>Denture satisfaction</term><term>Edentulous</term><term>Edentulous patients</term><term>Full dentures</term><term>Functional complaints</term><term>Functional problems</term><term>Groningen</term><term>Hard food</term><term>Healing period</term><term>Implant</term><term>Lateral cephalogram</term><term>Lower denture</term><term>Mandible</term><term>Mandibular</term><term>Maxillofac</term><term>Maxillofacial</term><term>Maxillofacial prosthodontics</term><term>Maxillofacial surgery</term><term>Neutral space</term><term>Oral maxillofac implants</term><term>Osseointegrated</term><term>Osseointegrated implants</term><term>Overall denture satisfaction rate</term><term>Overall denture satisfaction rating</term><term>Overdenture</term><term>Overdentures</term><term>Patient satisfaction</term><term>Preprosthetic</term><term>Preprosthetic surgery</term><term>Prosthet dent</term><term>Rating scale</term><term>Satisfaction rate</term><term>Soft food</term><term>Surgical groups</term><term>Tough food</term><term>University hospital groningen</term><term>Upper denture</term></keywords></textClass><langUsage><language ident="en">en</language></langUsage></profileDesc></teiHeader><front><div type="abstract" xml:lang="en">Abstract: Purpose: The objective of this study was to compare denture satisfaction and chewing ability of edentulous patients treated with dental implant-retained overdentures or with full dentures with or without previous preprosthetic surgery. Patients and Methods: This study was a controlled clinical trial. Thirty-eight men and 52 women participated in the study. The mean height of the anterior mandible was 21 mm (range, 16 to 25 mm), measured on a lateral cephalometric radiograph. The subjects were randomly assigned to the three treatment modalities. The main outcome measures were denture satisfaction and chewing ability, which were assessed using questionnaires focusing on denturerelated complaints and the ability to chew different types of food, and an overall denture satisfaction score. Results: Based on the baseline data from the “denture complaints” and “chewing ability” questionnaires, nine interpretable factors could be extracted. Two factors did not vary following treatment and were excluded from the outcome analysis. At the 1-year evaluation five of seven factors showed significantly better scores for the two surgical groups than for the control group. The same was found for the overall denture satisfaction rate. Conclusion: Overdentures retained by dental implants or complete dentures made after a vestibuloplasty and deepening of the floor of the mouth provide a more satisfactory solution for denture-related problems than complete dentures alone. For the scale “functional complaints lower denture,” the overdenture group showed even a significantly better score than the preprosthetic surgery group.</div></front></TEI><istex><corpusName>elsevier</corpusName><keywords><teeft><json:string>denture</json:string><json:string>functional complaints</json:string><json:string>overdentures</json:string><json:string>implant</json:string><json:string>preprosthetic</json:string><json:string>mandibular</json:string><json:string>denture satisfaction</json:string><json:string>complete dentures</json:string><json:string>maxillofacial</json:string><json:string>overdenture</json:string><json:string>denture complaints</json:string><json:string>osseointegrated</json:string><json:string>overall denture satisfaction rating</json:string><json:string>dental implants</json:string><json:string>lower denture</json:string><json:string>hard food</json:string><json:string>control group</json:string><json:string>mandible</json:string><json:string>groningen</json:string><json:string>patient satisfaction</json:string><json:string>maxillofac</json:string><json:string>edentulous</json:string><json:string>better scores</json:string><json:string>tough food</json:string><json:string>preprosthetic surgery</json:string><json:string>ability questionnaire</json:string><json:string>neutral space</json:string><json:string>edentulous patients</json:string><json:string>maxillofacial surgery</json:string><json:string>osseointegrated implants</json:string><json:string>ability questionnaires</json:string><json:string>soft food</json:string><json:string>baseline data</json:string><json:string>prosthet dent</json:string><json:string>oral maxillofac implants</json:string><json:string>university hospital groningen</json:string><json:string>functional problems</json:string><json:string>overall denture satisfaction rate</json:string><json:string>lateral cephalogram</json:string><json:string>surgical groups</json:string><json:string>healing period</json:string><json:string>rating scale</json:string><json:string>clinical trial</json:string><json:string>satisfaction rate</json:string><json:string>complaints questionnaire</json:string><json:string>full dentures</json:string><json:string>maxillofacial prosthodontics</json:string><json:string>upper denture</json:string></teeft></keywords><author><json:item><name>E.M Boerrigter DDS, PhD</name></json:item><json:item><name>B Stegenga DDS, PhD</name></json:item><json:item><name>G.M Raghoebar DDS, MD, PhD</name></json:item><json:item><name>G Boering DDS, PhD</name></json:item></author><arkIstex>ark:/67375/6H6-31T760ZV-6</arkIstex><language><json:string>eng</json:string></language><originalGenre><json:string>Full-length article</json:string></originalGenre><abstract>Abstract: Purpose: The objective of this study was to compare denture satisfaction and chewing ability of edentulous patients treated with dental implant-retained overdentures or with full dentures with or without previous preprosthetic surgery. Patients and Methods: This study was a controlled clinical trial. Thirty-eight men and 52 women participated in the study. The mean height of the anterior mandible was 21 mm (range, 16 to 25 mm), measured on a lateral cephalometric radiograph. The subjects were randomly assigned to the three treatment modalities. The main outcome measures were denture satisfaction and chewing ability, which were assessed using questionnaires focusing on denturerelated complaints and the ability to chew different types of food, and an overall denture satisfaction score. Results: Based on the baseline data from the “denture complaints” and “chewing ability” questionnaires, nine interpretable factors could be extracted. Two factors did not vary following treatment and were excluded from the outcome analysis. At the 1-year evaluation five of seven factors showed significantly better scores for the two surgical groups than for the control group. The same was found for the overall denture satisfaction rate. Conclusion: Overdentures retained by dental implants or complete dentures made after a vestibuloplasty and deepening of the floor of the mouth provide a more satisfactory solution for denture-related problems than complete dentures alone. For the scale “functional complaints lower denture,” the overdenture group showed even a significantly better score than the preprosthetic surgery group.</abstract><qualityIndicators><score>8.405</score><pdfWordCount>3561</pdfWordCount><pdfCharCount>25493</pdfCharCount><pdfVersion>1.3</pdfVersion><pdfPageCount>7</pdfPageCount><pdfPageSize>576.28 x 828 pts</pdfPageSize><refBibsNative>true</refBibsNative><abstractWordCount>237</abstractWordCount><abstractCharCount>1638</abstractCharCount><keywordCount>0</keywordCount></qualityIndicators><title>Patient satisfaction and chewing ability with implant-retained mandibular overdentures: A comparison with new complete dentures with or without preprosthetic surgery</title><pmid><json:string>7562170</json:string></pmid><pii><json:string>0278-2391(95)90627-4</json:string></pii><genre><json:string>research-article</json:string></genre><serie><title>Doctoral thesis</title><language><json:string>unknown</json:string></language></serie><host><title>Journal of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery</title><language><json:string>unknown</json:string></language><publicationDate>1995</publicationDate><issn><json:string>0278-2391</json:string></issn><pii><json:string>S0278-2391(00)X0222-4</json:string></pii><volume>53</volume><issue>10</issue><pages><first>1167</first><last>1173</last></pages><genre><json:string>journal</json:string></genre></host><namedEntities><unitex><date><json:string>from December 1989 to September 1991</json:string><json:string>1995</json:string></date><geogName></geogName><orgName><json:string>University of Nijmegen</json:string><json:string>Department of Medical</json:string><json:string>Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery</json:string><json:string>National Health Insurance Council</json:string><json:string>University Hospital Groningen, Groningen, The Netherlands</json:string><json:string>Department of Oral Function and Prosthetic Dentistry</json:string><json:string>University Hospital, Groningen, the Netherlands</json:string><json:string>University Hospital Groningen, PO Box</json:string></orgName><orgName_funder></orgName_funder><orgName_provider></orgName_provider><persName><json:string>Professor</json:string><json:string>Boerrigter</json:string><json:string>Informed</json:string><json:string>M.A. Statistics</json:string><json:string>o They</json:string></persName><placeName><json:string>Groningen</json:string><json:string>Germany</json:string><json:string>Mannheim</json:string><json:string>American</json:string><json:string>Hof</json:string><json:string>Sweden</json:string><json:string>Netherlands</json:string></placeName><ref_url></ref_url><ref_bibl><json:string>Haraldson et al</json:string><json:string>Kiyak et al</json:string></ref_bibl><bibl></bibl></unitex></namedEntities><ark><json:string>ark:/67375/6H6-31T760ZV-6</json:string></ark><categories><wos><json:string>1 - science</json:string><json:string>2 - dentistry, oral surgery & medicine</json:string></wos><scienceMetrix><json:string>1 - health sciences</json:string><json:string>2 - clinical medicine</json:string><json:string>3 - dentistry</json:string></scienceMetrix><scopus><json:string>1 - Health Sciences</json:string><json:string>2 - Medicine</json:string><json:string>3 - Otorhinolaryngology</json:string><json:string>1 - Health Sciences</json:string><json:string>2 - Dentistry</json:string><json:string>3 - Oral Surgery</json:string><json:string>1 - Health Sciences</json:string><json:string>2 - Medicine</json:string><json:string>3 - Surgery</json:string></scopus><inist><json:string>1 - sciences appliquees, technologies et medecines</json:string><json:string>2 - sciences biologiques et medicales</json:string><json:string>3 - sciences medicales</json:string></inist></categories><publicationDate>1995</publicationDate><copyrightDate>1995</copyrightDate><doi><json:string>10.1016/0278-2391(95)90627-4</json:string></doi><id>CC505B836C06289DD1CE0132658E66A447D59F78</id><score>1</score><fulltext><json:item><extension>pdf</extension><original>true</original><mimetype>application/pdf</mimetype><uri>https://api.istex.fr/document/CC505B836C06289DD1CE0132658E66A447D59F78/fulltext/pdf</uri></json:item><json:item><extension>zip</extension><original>false</original><mimetype>application/zip</mimetype><uri>https://api.istex.fr/document/CC505B836C06289DD1CE0132658E66A447D59F78/fulltext/zip</uri></json:item><istex:fulltextTEI uri="https://api.istex.fr/document/CC505B836C06289DD1CE0132658E66A447D59F78/fulltext/tei"><teiHeader><fileDesc><titleStmt><title level="a">Patient satisfaction and chewing ability with implant-retained mandibular overdentures: A comparison with new complete dentures with or without preprosthetic surgery</title></titleStmt><publicationStmt><authority>ISTEX</authority><publisher>ELSEVIER</publisher><availability><p>ELSEVIER</p></availability><date>1995</date></publicationStmt><notesStmt><note>Received from the Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery and Maxillofacial Prosthodontics, University Hospital Groningen, Groningen, The Netherlands.</note><note>This study is part of the Academic Dutch Implant-Overdenture Study, supported by The National Health Insurance Council (Grant OG: 89-76).</note><note type="content">Section title: Clinical article</note></notesStmt><sourceDesc><biblStruct type="inbook"><analytic><title level="a">Patient satisfaction and chewing ability with implant-retained mandibular overdentures: A comparison with new complete dentures with or without preprosthetic surgery</title><author xml:id="author-0000"><persName><forename type="first">E.M</forename><surname>Boerrigter</surname></persName><roleName type="degree">DDS, PhD</roleName><note type="biography">Student.</note><affiliation>Student.</affiliation></author><author xml:id="author-0001"><persName><forename type="first">B</forename><surname>Stegenga</surname></persName><roleName type="degree">DDS, PhD</roleName><note type="biography">Assistant Professor.</note><affiliation>Assistant Professor.</affiliation></author><author xml:id="author-0002"><persName><forename type="first">G.M</forename><surname>Raghoebar</surname></persName><roleName type="degree">DDS, MD, PhD</roleName><note type="biography">Assistant Professor.</note><affiliation>Assistant Professor.</affiliation></author><author xml:id="author-0003"><persName><forename type="first">G</forename><surname>Boering</surname></persName><roleName type="degree">DDS, PhD</roleName><note type="biography">Assistant Professor.</note><affiliation>Assistant Professor.</affiliation></author><idno type="istex">CC505B836C06289DD1CE0132658E66A447D59F78</idno><idno type="DOI">10.1016/0278-2391(95)90627-4</idno><idno type="PII">0278-2391(95)90627-4</idno></analytic><monogr><title level="j">Journal of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery</title><title level="j" type="abbrev">YJOMS</title><idno type="pISSN">0278-2391</idno><idno type="PII">S0278-2391(00)X0222-4</idno><imprint><publisher>ELSEVIER</publisher><date type="published" when="1995"></date><biblScope unit="volume">53</biblScope><biblScope unit="issue">10</biblScope><biblScope unit="page" from="1167">1167</biblScope><biblScope unit="page" to="1173">1173</biblScope></imprint></monogr></biblStruct></sourceDesc></fileDesc><profileDesc><creation><date>1995</date></creation><langUsage><language ident="en">en</language></langUsage><abstract xml:lang="en"><p>Purpose: The objective of this study was to compare denture satisfaction and chewing ability of edentulous patients treated with dental implant-retained overdentures or with full dentures with or without previous preprosthetic surgery. Patients and Methods: This study was a controlled clinical trial. Thirty-eight men and 52 women participated in the study. The mean height of the anterior mandible was 21 mm (range, 16 to 25 mm), measured on a lateral cephalometric radiograph. The subjects were randomly assigned to the three treatment modalities. The main outcome measures were denture satisfaction and chewing ability, which were assessed using questionnaires focusing on denturerelated complaints and the ability to chew different types of food, and an overall denture satisfaction score. Results: Based on the baseline data from the “denture complaints” and “chewing ability” questionnaires, nine interpretable factors could be extracted. Two factors did not vary following treatment and were excluded from the outcome analysis. At the 1-year evaluation five of seven factors showed significantly better scores for the two surgical groups than for the control group. The same was found for the overall denture satisfaction rate. Conclusion: Overdentures retained by dental implants or complete dentures made after a vestibuloplasty and deepening of the floor of the mouth provide a more satisfactory solution for denture-related problems than complete dentures alone. For the scale “functional complaints lower denture,” the overdenture group showed even a significantly better score than the preprosthetic surgery group.</p></abstract></profileDesc><revisionDesc><change when="1995">Published</change></revisionDesc></teiHeader></istex:fulltextTEI><json:item><extension>txt</extension><original>false</original><mimetype>text/plain</mimetype><uri>https://api.istex.fr/document/CC505B836C06289DD1CE0132658E66A447D59F78/fulltext/txt</uri></json:item></fulltext><metadata><istex:metadataXml wicri:clean="Elsevier, elements deleted: tail"><istex:xmlDeclaration>version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"</istex:xmlDeclaration><istex:docType PUBLIC="-//ES//DTD journal article DTD version 4.5.2//EN//XML" URI="art452.dtd" name="istex:docType"></istex:docType><istex:document><converted-article version="4.5.2" docsubtype="fla"><item-info><jid>YJOMS</jid><aid>95906274</aid><ce:pii>0278-2391(95)90627-4</ce:pii><ce:doi>10.1016/0278-2391(95)90627-4</ce:doi><ce:copyright type="unknown" year="1995"></ce:copyright></item-info><head><ce:article-footnote><ce:label>☆</ce:label><ce:note-para>Received from the Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery and Maxillofacial Prosthodontics, University Hospital Groningen, Groningen, The Netherlands.</ce:note-para></ce:article-footnote><ce:article-footnote><ce:label>☆☆</ce:label><ce:note-para>This study is part of the Academic Dutch Implant-Overdenture Study, supported by The National Health Insurance Council (Grant OG: 89-76).</ce:note-para></ce:article-footnote><ce:dochead><ce:textfn>Clinical article</ce:textfn></ce:dochead><ce:title>Patient satisfaction and chewing ability with implant-retained mandibular overdentures: A comparison with new complete dentures with or without preprosthetic surgery</ce:title><ce:author-group><ce:author><ce:given-name>E.M</ce:given-name><ce:surname>Boerrigter</ce:surname><ce:degrees>DDS, PhD</ce:degrees><ce:cross-ref refid="COR1"><ce:sup>∗</ce:sup></ce:cross-ref><ce:cross-ref refid="FN1"><ce:sup>∗</ce:sup></ce:cross-ref></ce:author><ce:author><ce:given-name>B</ce:given-name><ce:surname>Stegenga</ce:surname><ce:degrees>DDS, PhD</ce:degrees><ce:cross-ref refid="FN2"><ce:sup>†</ce:sup></ce:cross-ref></ce:author><ce:author><ce:given-name>G.M</ce:given-name><ce:surname>Raghoebar</ce:surname><ce:degrees>DDS, MD, PhD</ce:degrees><ce:cross-ref refid="FN2"><ce:sup>†</ce:sup></ce:cross-ref></ce:author><ce:author><ce:given-name>G</ce:given-name><ce:surname>Boering</ce:surname><ce:degrees>DDS, PhD</ce:degrees><ce:cross-ref refid="FN2"><ce:sup>‡</ce:sup></ce:cross-ref></ce:author><ce:correspondence id="COR1"><ce:label>∗</ce:label><ce:text>Address correspondence and reprint requests to Dr Boerrigter: Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery and Maxillofacial Prosthodontics, University Hospital Groningen, PO Box 30.001, 9700 RB Groningen, The Netherlands.</ce:text></ce:correspondence><ce:footnote id="FN1"><ce:label>∗</ce:label><ce:note-para>Student.</ce:note-para></ce:footnote><ce:footnote id="FN2"><ce:label>†</ce:label><ce:note-para>Assistant Professor.</ce:note-para></ce:footnote></ce:author-group><ce:abstract><ce:section-title>Abstract</ce:section-title><ce:abstract-sec><ce:simple-para><math altimg="si1.gif"><rm><unl type="bar">Purpose</unl></rm></math>: The objective of this study was to compare denture satisfaction and chewing ability of edentulous patients treated with dental implant-retained overdentures or with full dentures with or without previous preprosthetic surgery.</ce:simple-para><ce:simple-para><math altimg="si2.gif"><rm><unl type="bar">Patients and Methods</unl></rm></math>: This study was a controlled clinical trial. Thirty-eight men and 52 women participated in the study. The mean height of the anterior mandible was 21 mm (range, 16 to 25 mm), measured on a lateral cephalometric radiograph. The subjects were randomly assigned to the three treatment modalities. The main outcome measures were denture satisfaction and chewing ability, which were assessed using questionnaires focusing on denturerelated complaints and the ability to chew different types of food, and an overall denture satisfaction score.</ce:simple-para><ce:simple-para><math altimg="si3.gif"><rm><unl type="bar">Results</unl></rm></math>: Based on the baseline data from the “denture complaints” and “chewing ability” questionnaires, nine interpretable factors could be extracted. Two factors did not vary following treatment and were excluded from the outcome analysis. At the 1-year evaluation five of seven factors showed significantly better scores for the two surgical groups than for the control group. The same was found for the overall denture satisfaction rate.</ce:simple-para><ce:simple-para><math altimg="si4.gif"><rm><unl type="bar">Conclusion</unl></rm></math>: Overdentures retained by dental implants or complete dentures made after a vestibuloplasty and deepening of the floor of the mouth provide a more satisfactory solution for denture-related problems than complete dentures alone. For the scale “functional complaints lower denture,” the overdenture group showed even a significantly better score than the preprosthetic surgery group.</ce:simple-para></ce:abstract-sec></ce:abstract></head></converted-article></istex:document></istex:metadataXml><mods version="3.6"><titleInfo><title>Patient satisfaction and chewing ability with implant-retained mandibular overdentures: A comparison with new complete dentures with or without preprosthetic surgery</title></titleInfo><titleInfo type="alternative" contentType="CDATA"><title>Patient satisfaction and chewing ability with implant-retained mandibular overdentures: A comparison with new complete dentures with or without preprosthetic surgery</title></titleInfo><name type="personal"><namePart type="given">E.M</namePart><namePart type="family">Boerrigter</namePart><namePart type="termsOfAddress">DDS, PhD</namePart><description>Student.</description><role><roleTerm type="text">author</roleTerm></role></name><name type="personal"><namePart type="given">B</namePart><namePart type="family">Stegenga</namePart><namePart type="termsOfAddress">DDS, PhD</namePart><description>Assistant Professor.</description><role><roleTerm type="text">author</roleTerm></role></name><name type="personal"><namePart type="given">G.M</namePart><namePart type="family">Raghoebar</namePart><namePart type="termsOfAddress">DDS, MD, PhD</namePart><description>Assistant Professor.</description><role><roleTerm type="text">author</roleTerm></role></name><name type="personal"><namePart type="given">G</namePart><namePart type="family">Boering</namePart><namePart type="termsOfAddress">DDS, PhD</namePart><description>Assistant Professor.</description><role><roleTerm type="text">author</roleTerm></role></name><typeOfResource>text</typeOfResource><genre type="research-article" displayLabel="Full-length article" authority="ISTEX" authorityURI="https://content-type.data.istex.fr" valueURI="https://content-type.data.istex.fr/ark:/67375/XTP-1JC4F85T-7">research-article</genre><originInfo><publisher>ELSEVIER</publisher><dateIssued encoding="w3cdtf">1995</dateIssued><copyrightDate encoding="w3cdtf">1995</copyrightDate></originInfo><language><languageTerm type="code" authority="iso639-2b">eng</languageTerm><languageTerm type="code" authority="rfc3066">en</languageTerm></language><abstract lang="en">Abstract: Purpose: The objective of this study was to compare denture satisfaction and chewing ability of edentulous patients treated with dental implant-retained overdentures or with full dentures with or without previous preprosthetic surgery. Patients and Methods: This study was a controlled clinical trial. Thirty-eight men and 52 women participated in the study. The mean height of the anterior mandible was 21 mm (range, 16 to 25 mm), measured on a lateral cephalometric radiograph. The subjects were randomly assigned to the three treatment modalities. The main outcome measures were denture satisfaction and chewing ability, which were assessed using questionnaires focusing on denturerelated complaints and the ability to chew different types of food, and an overall denture satisfaction score. Results: Based on the baseline data from the “denture complaints” and “chewing ability” questionnaires, nine interpretable factors could be extracted. Two factors did not vary following treatment and were excluded from the outcome analysis. At the 1-year evaluation five of seven factors showed significantly better scores for the two surgical groups than for the control group. The same was found for the overall denture satisfaction rate. Conclusion: Overdentures retained by dental implants or complete dentures made after a vestibuloplasty and deepening of the floor of the mouth provide a more satisfactory solution for denture-related problems than complete dentures alone. For the scale “functional complaints lower denture,” the overdenture group showed even a significantly better score than the preprosthetic surgery group.</abstract><note>Received from the Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery and Maxillofacial Prosthodontics, University Hospital Groningen, Groningen, The Netherlands.</note><note>This study is part of the Academic Dutch Implant-Overdenture Study, supported by The National Health Insurance Council (Grant OG: 89-76).</note><note type="content">Section title: Clinical article</note><relatedItem type="host"><titleInfo><title>Journal of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery</title></titleInfo><titleInfo type="abbreviated"><title>YJOMS</title></titleInfo><genre type="journal" authority="ISTEX" authorityURI="https://publication-type.data.istex.fr" valueURI="https://publication-type.data.istex.fr/ark:/67375/JMC-0GLKJH51-B">journal</genre><originInfo><publisher>ELSEVIER</publisher><dateIssued encoding="w3cdtf">199510</dateIssued></originInfo><identifier type="ISSN">0278-2391</identifier><identifier type="PII">S0278-2391(00)X0222-4</identifier><part><date>199510</date><detail type="volume"><number>53</number><caption>vol.</caption></detail><detail type="issue"><number>10</number><caption>no.</caption></detail><extent unit="issue-pages"><start>1133</start><end>1238</end></extent><extent unit="pages"><start>1167</start><end>1173</end></extent></part></relatedItem><identifier type="istex">CC505B836C06289DD1CE0132658E66A447D59F78</identifier><identifier type="ark">ark:/67375/6H6-31T760ZV-6</identifier><identifier type="DOI">10.1016/0278-2391(95)90627-4</identifier><identifier type="PII">0278-2391(95)90627-4</identifier><recordInfo><recordContentSource authority="ISTEX" authorityURI="https://loaded-corpus.data.istex.fr" valueURI="https://loaded-corpus.data.istex.fr/ark:/67375/XBH-HKKZVM7B-M">elsevier</recordContentSource></recordInfo></mods><json:item><extension>json</extension><original>false</original><mimetype>application/json</mimetype><uri>https://api.istex.fr/document/CC505B836C06289DD1CE0132658E66A447D59F78/metadata/json</uri></json:item></metadata></istex></record>Pour manipuler ce document sous Unix (Dilib)
EXPLOR_STEP=$WICRI_ROOT/Wicri/Santé/explor/EdenteV2/Data/Istex/Corpus
HfdSelect -h $EXPLOR_STEP/biblio.hfd -nk 006557 | SxmlIndent | more
Ou
HfdSelect -h $EXPLOR_AREA/Data/Istex/Corpus/biblio.hfd -nk 006557 | SxmlIndent | more
Pour mettre un lien sur cette page dans le réseau Wicri
{{Explor lien
|wiki= Wicri/Santé
|area= EdenteV2
|flux= Istex
|étape= Corpus
|type= RBID
|clé= ISTEX:CC505B836C06289DD1CE0132658E66A447D59F78
|texte= Patient satisfaction and chewing ability with implant-retained mandibular overdentures: A comparison with new complete dentures with or without preprosthetic surgery
}}
| This area was generated with Dilib version V0.6.32. |  |