Implant image quality in dental radiographs recorded using a customized imaging guide or a standard film holder
Identifieur interne : 006449 ( Istex/Corpus ); précédent : 006448; suivant : 006450Implant image quality in dental radiographs recorded using a customized imaging guide or a standard film holder
Auteurs : Lars Schropp ; Andreas Stavropoulos ; Rubens Spin-Neto ; Ann WenzelSource :
- Clinical Oral Implants Research [ 0905-7161 ] ; 2012-01.
English descriptors
- KwdEn :
- Aarhus, Aarhus university, Acceptable image, Acceptable images, Adjacent teeth, Alveolar process, Beam direction, Bone level, Cast model, Clinical periodontology, Dental implants, Dental radiographs, Dentistry, Different inclination, Distal inclination, Exposure method scores, Exposures method scores, Fewer exposures, Holder method, Imaging, Imaging guide, Imaging guide film holder maxilla imaging guide film holder mandible imaging guide film holder, Imaging guide method, Imaging methods, Implant, Implant image quality, Implant images, Implant sides, Implant threads, Intraoral, Intraoral radiographs, John wiley sons, Long axis, Median, Minor variation, Mnemonic rule, Nobel biocare, Occlusal plate, Optimal projection, Oral impl, Other half, Other hand, Palatal inclination, Perfect image, Phantom head, Previous studies, Prosthetic dentistry, Quality categories, Radiation beam, Radiograph, Radiographic examination, Right side, Same frequency, Same number, Schropp, Second exposure, Sharp threads, Vertical plane, Vertical plate.
- Teeft :
- Aarhus, Aarhus university, Acceptable image, Acceptable images, Adjacent teeth, Alveolar process, Beam direction, Bone level, Cast model, Clinical periodontology, Dental implants, Dental radiographs, Dentistry, Different inclination, Distal inclination, Exposure method scores, Exposures method scores, Fewer exposures, Holder method, Imaging, Imaging guide, Imaging guide film holder maxilla imaging guide film holder mandible imaging guide film holder, Imaging guide method, Imaging methods, Implant, Implant image quality, Implant images, Implant sides, Implant threads, Intraoral, Intraoral radiographs, John wiley sons, Long axis, Median, Minor variation, Mnemonic rule, Nobel biocare, Occlusal plate, Optimal projection, Oral impl, Other half, Other hand, Palatal inclination, Perfect image, Phantom head, Previous studies, Prosthetic dentistry, Quality categories, Radiation beam, Radiograph, Radiographic examination, Right side, Same frequency, Same number, Schropp, Second exposure, Sharp threads, Vertical plane, Vertical plate.
Abstract
Objective: To compare a customized imaging guide and a standard film holder for obtaining optimally projected intraoral radiographs of dental implants.
Url:
DOI: 10.1111/j.1600-0501.2011.02180.x
Links to Exploration step
ISTEX:CA1E92F94B47705DE9A27E46B4A1A024D4BE492DLe document en format XML
<record><TEI wicri:istexFullTextTei="biblStruct"><teiHeader><fileDesc><titleStmt><title xml:lang="en">Implant image quality in dental radiographs recorded using a customized imaging guide or a standard film holder</title><author><name sortKey="Schropp, Lars" sort="Schropp, Lars" uniqKey="Schropp L" first="Lars" last="Schropp">Lars Schropp</name><affiliation><mods:affiliation>Department of Prosthetic Dentistry, School of Dentistry, Aarhus University, Aarhus C, Denmark</mods:affiliation></affiliation></author><author><name sortKey="Stavropoulos, Andreas" sort="Stavropoulos, Andreas" uniqKey="Stavropoulos A" first="Andreas" last="Stavropoulos">Andreas Stavropoulos</name><affiliation><mods:affiliation>Department of Periodontology, School of Dentistry, Aarhus University, Aarhus C, Denmark</mods:affiliation></affiliation></author><author><name sortKey="Spin Eto, Rubens" sort="Spin Eto, Rubens" uniqKey="Spin Eto R" first="Rubens" last="Spin-Neto">Rubens Spin-Neto</name><affiliation><mods:affiliation>Department of Periodontology, Araraquara Dental School, UNESP – Univ. Estadual Paulista, Sao Paulo, SP, Brazil</mods:affiliation></affiliation></author><author><name sortKey="Wenzel, Ann" sort="Wenzel, Ann" uniqKey="Wenzel A" first="Ann" last="Wenzel">Ann Wenzel</name><affiliation><mods:affiliation>Department of Oral Radiology, School of Dentistry, Aarhus University, Aarhus C, Denmark</mods:affiliation></affiliation></author></titleStmt><publicationStmt><idno type="wicri:source">ISTEX</idno><idno type="RBID">ISTEX:CA1E92F94B47705DE9A27E46B4A1A024D4BE492D</idno><date when="2012" year="2012">2012</date><idno type="doi">10.1111/j.1600-0501.2011.02180.x</idno><idno type="url">https://api.istex.fr/document/CA1E92F94B47705DE9A27E46B4A1A024D4BE492D/fulltext/pdf</idno><idno type="wicri:Area/Istex/Corpus">006449</idno><idno type="wicri:explorRef" wicri:stream="Istex" wicri:step="Corpus" wicri:corpus="ISTEX">006449</idno></publicationStmt><sourceDesc><biblStruct><analytic><title level="a" type="main">Implant image quality in dental radiographs recorded using a customized imaging guide or a standard film holder</title><author><name sortKey="Schropp, Lars" sort="Schropp, Lars" uniqKey="Schropp L" first="Lars" last="Schropp">Lars Schropp</name><affiliation><mods:affiliation>Department of Prosthetic Dentistry, School of Dentistry, Aarhus University, Aarhus C, Denmark</mods:affiliation></affiliation></author><author><name sortKey="Stavropoulos, Andreas" sort="Stavropoulos, Andreas" uniqKey="Stavropoulos A" first="Andreas" last="Stavropoulos">Andreas Stavropoulos</name><affiliation><mods:affiliation>Department of Periodontology, School of Dentistry, Aarhus University, Aarhus C, Denmark</mods:affiliation></affiliation></author><author><name sortKey="Spin Eto, Rubens" sort="Spin Eto, Rubens" uniqKey="Spin Eto R" first="Rubens" last="Spin-Neto">Rubens Spin-Neto</name><affiliation><mods:affiliation>Department of Periodontology, Araraquara Dental School, UNESP – Univ. Estadual Paulista, Sao Paulo, SP, Brazil</mods:affiliation></affiliation></author><author><name sortKey="Wenzel, Ann" sort="Wenzel, Ann" uniqKey="Wenzel A" first="Ann" last="Wenzel">Ann Wenzel</name><affiliation><mods:affiliation>Department of Oral Radiology, School of Dentistry, Aarhus University, Aarhus C, Denmark</mods:affiliation></affiliation></author></analytic><monogr></monogr><series><title level="j" type="main">Clinical Oral Implants Research</title><title level="j" type="alt">CLINICAL ORAL IMPLANTS RESEARCH</title><idno type="ISSN">0905-7161</idno><idno type="eISSN">1600-0501</idno><imprint><biblScope unit="vol">23</biblScope><biblScope unit="issue">1</biblScope><biblScope unit="page" from="55">55</biblScope><biblScope unit="page" to="59">59</biblScope><biblScope unit="page-count">5</biblScope><publisher>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</publisher><pubPlace>Oxford, UK</pubPlace><date type="published" when="2012-01">2012-01</date></imprint><idno type="ISSN">0905-7161</idno></series></biblStruct></sourceDesc><seriesStmt><idno type="ISSN">0905-7161</idno></seriesStmt></fileDesc><profileDesc><textClass><keywords scheme="KwdEn" xml:lang="en"><term>Aarhus</term><term>Aarhus university</term><term>Acceptable image</term><term>Acceptable images</term><term>Adjacent teeth</term><term>Alveolar process</term><term>Beam direction</term><term>Bone level</term><term>Cast model</term><term>Clinical periodontology</term><term>Dental implants</term><term>Dental radiographs</term><term>Dentistry</term><term>Different inclination</term><term>Distal inclination</term><term>Exposure method scores</term><term>Exposures method scores</term><term>Fewer exposures</term><term>Holder method</term><term>Imaging</term><term>Imaging guide</term><term>Imaging guide film holder maxilla imaging guide film holder mandible imaging guide film holder</term><term>Imaging guide method</term><term>Imaging methods</term><term>Implant</term><term>Implant image quality</term><term>Implant images</term><term>Implant sides</term><term>Implant threads</term><term>Intraoral</term><term>Intraoral radiographs</term><term>John wiley sons</term><term>Long axis</term><term>Median</term><term>Minor variation</term><term>Mnemonic rule</term><term>Nobel biocare</term><term>Occlusal plate</term><term>Optimal projection</term><term>Oral impl</term><term>Other half</term><term>Other hand</term><term>Palatal inclination</term><term>Perfect image</term><term>Phantom head</term><term>Previous studies</term><term>Prosthetic dentistry</term><term>Quality categories</term><term>Radiation beam</term><term>Radiograph</term><term>Radiographic examination</term><term>Right side</term><term>Same frequency</term><term>Same number</term><term>Schropp</term><term>Second exposure</term><term>Sharp threads</term><term>Vertical plane</term><term>Vertical plate</term></keywords><keywords scheme="Teeft" xml:lang="en"><term>Aarhus</term><term>Aarhus university</term><term>Acceptable image</term><term>Acceptable images</term><term>Adjacent teeth</term><term>Alveolar process</term><term>Beam direction</term><term>Bone level</term><term>Cast model</term><term>Clinical periodontology</term><term>Dental implants</term><term>Dental radiographs</term><term>Dentistry</term><term>Different inclination</term><term>Distal inclination</term><term>Exposure method scores</term><term>Exposures method scores</term><term>Fewer exposures</term><term>Holder method</term><term>Imaging</term><term>Imaging guide</term><term>Imaging guide film holder maxilla imaging guide film holder mandible imaging guide film holder</term><term>Imaging guide method</term><term>Imaging methods</term><term>Implant</term><term>Implant image quality</term><term>Implant images</term><term>Implant sides</term><term>Implant threads</term><term>Intraoral</term><term>Intraoral radiographs</term><term>John wiley sons</term><term>Long axis</term><term>Median</term><term>Minor variation</term><term>Mnemonic rule</term><term>Nobel biocare</term><term>Occlusal plate</term><term>Optimal projection</term><term>Oral impl</term><term>Other half</term><term>Other hand</term><term>Palatal inclination</term><term>Perfect image</term><term>Phantom head</term><term>Previous studies</term><term>Prosthetic dentistry</term><term>Quality categories</term><term>Radiation beam</term><term>Radiograph</term><term>Radiographic examination</term><term>Right side</term><term>Same frequency</term><term>Same number</term><term>Schropp</term><term>Second exposure</term><term>Sharp threads</term><term>Vertical plane</term><term>Vertical plate</term></keywords></textClass></profileDesc></teiHeader><front><div type="abstract">Objective: To compare a customized imaging guide and a standard film holder for obtaining optimally projected intraoral radiographs of dental implants.</div></front></TEI><istex><corpusName>wiley</corpusName><keywords><teeft><json:string>implant</json:string><json:string>radiograph</json:string><json:string>imaging guide method</json:string><json:string>holder method</json:string><json:string>imaging guide</json:string><json:string>imaging</json:string><json:string>intraoral</json:string><json:string>aarhus</json:string><json:string>schropp</json:string><json:string>acceptable image</json:string><json:string>intraoral radiographs</json:string><json:string>implant image quality</json:string><json:string>dental implants</json:string><json:string>oral impl</json:string><json:string>implant sides</json:string><json:string>john wiley sons</json:string><json:string>implant threads</json:string><json:string>acceptable images</json:string><json:string>median</json:string><json:string>dentistry</json:string><json:string>imaging methods</json:string><json:string>imaging guide film holder maxilla imaging guide film holder mandible imaging guide film holder</json:string><json:string>aarhus university</json:string><json:string>mnemonic rule</json:string><json:string>other hand</json:string><json:string>sharp threads</json:string><json:string>dental radiographs</json:string><json:string>alveolar process</json:string><json:string>clinical periodontology</json:string><json:string>other half</json:string><json:string>bone level</json:string><json:string>radiation beam</json:string><json:string>long axis</json:string><json:string>prosthetic dentistry</json:string><json:string>vertical plane</json:string><json:string>previous studies</json:string><json:string>right side</json:string><json:string>beam direction</json:string><json:string>implant images</json:string><json:string>quality categories</json:string><json:string>phantom head</json:string><json:string>nobel biocare</json:string><json:string>adjacent teeth</json:string><json:string>same frequency</json:string><json:string>cast model</json:string><json:string>vertical plate</json:string><json:string>occlusal plate</json:string><json:string>same number</json:string><json:string>second exposure</json:string><json:string>minor variation</json:string><json:string>distal inclination</json:string><json:string>palatal inclination</json:string><json:string>radiographic examination</json:string><json:string>exposure method scores</json:string><json:string>different inclination</json:string><json:string>exposures method scores</json:string><json:string>perfect image</json:string><json:string>fewer exposures</json:string><json:string>optimal projection</json:string></teeft></keywords><author><json:item><name>Lars Schropp</name><affiliations><json:string>Department of Prosthetic Dentistry, School of Dentistry, Aarhus University, Aarhus C, Denmark</json:string></affiliations></json:item><json:item><name>Andreas Stavropoulos</name><affiliations><json:string>Department of Periodontology, School of Dentistry, Aarhus University, Aarhus C, Denmark</json:string></affiliations></json:item><json:item><name>Rubens Spin‐Neto</name><affiliations><json:string>Department of Periodontology, Araraquara Dental School, UNESP – Univ. Estadual Paulista, Sao Paulo, SP, Brazil</json:string></affiliations></json:item><json:item><name>Ann Wenzel</name><affiliations><json:string>Department of Oral Radiology, School of Dentistry, Aarhus University, Aarhus C, Denmark</json:string></affiliations></json:item></author><subject><json:item><lang><json:string>eng</json:string></lang><value>dental</value></json:item><json:item><lang><json:string>eng</json:string></lang><value>imaging guide</value></json:item><json:item><lang><json:string>eng</json:string></lang><value>implant</value></json:item><json:item><lang><json:string>eng</json:string></lang><value>intraoral</value></json:item><json:item><lang><json:string>eng</json:string></lang><value>radiography</value></json:item></subject><articleId><json:string>CLR2180</json:string></articleId><arkIstex>ark:/67375/WNG-9V2J0QS0-9</arkIstex><language><json:string>eng</json:string></language><originalGenre><json:string>article</json:string></originalGenre><abstract>Objective: To compare a customized imaging guide and a standard film holder for obtaining optimally projected intraoral radiographs of dental implants.</abstract><qualityIndicators><score>5.651</score><pdfWordCount>3399</pdfWordCount><pdfCharCount>20752</pdfCharCount><pdfVersion>1.3</pdfVersion><pdfPageCount>5</pdfPageCount><pdfPageSize>595.276 x 782.362 pts</pdfPageSize><refBibsNative>true</refBibsNative><abstractWordCount>21</abstractWordCount><abstractCharCount>151</abstractCharCount><keywordCount>5</keywordCount></qualityIndicators><title>Implant image quality in dental radiographs recorded using a customized imaging guide or a standard film holder</title><pmid><json:string>21488967</json:string></pmid><genre><json:string>article</json:string></genre><host><title>Clinical Oral Implants Research</title><language><json:string>unknown</json:string></language><doi><json:string>10.1111/(ISSN)1600-0501</json:string></doi><issn><json:string>0905-7161</json:string></issn><eissn><json:string>1600-0501</json:string></eissn><publisherId><json:string>CLR</json:string></publisherId><volume>23</volume><issue>1</issue><pages><first>55</first><last>59</last><total>5</total></pages><genre><json:string>journal</json:string></genre></host><namedEntities><unitex><date><json:string>2012</json:string></date><geogName></geogName><orgName><json:string>Lars Schropp Department of Prosthetic Dentistry School of Dentistry Aarhus University Vennelyst Boulevard</json:string><json:string>C Denmark Tel</json:string><json:string>Brazil Ann Wenzel, Department of Oral Radiology, School of Dentistry, Aarhus University, Aarhus</json:string><json:string>Denmark Andreas Stavropoulos, Department of Periodontology, School of Dentistry, Aarhus University, Aarhus</json:string><json:string>Denmark Rubens Spin-Neto, Department of Periodontology, Araraquara Dental School, UNESP</json:string><json:string>Dentsply International, York</json:string><json:string>Denmark Implant</json:string><json:string>Denbur Inc.</json:string></orgName><orgName_funder></orgName_funder><orgName_provider></orgName_provider><persName><json:string>Film</json:string><json:string>John Wiley</json:string><json:string>Min</json:string><json:string>Table</json:string><json:string>If</json:string><json:string>Lars Schropp</json:string></persName><placeName><json:string>IL</json:string><json:string>Germany</json:string><json:string>Finland</json:string><json:string>USA</json:string><json:string>Gothenburg</json:string><json:string>Oak Brook</json:string><json:string>Sweden</json:string></placeName><ref_url></ref_url><ref_bibl><json:string>Meijndert et al. (2004)</json:string><json:string>Schropp et al</json:string><json:string>Meijer et al. 1992</json:string><json:string>Landis & Koch 1977</json:string><json:string>Meijndert et al. 2004</json:string><json:string>Larheim et al. 1979</json:string><json:string>Larheim & Eggen 1982</json:string></ref_bibl><bibl></bibl></unitex></namedEntities><ark><json:string>ark:/67375/WNG-9V2J0QS0-9</json:string></ark><categories><wos><json:string>1 - science</json:string><json:string>2 - engineering, biomedical</json:string><json:string>2 - dentistry, oral surgery & medicine</json:string></wos><scienceMetrix><json:string>1 - health sciences</json:string><json:string>2 - clinical medicine</json:string><json:string>3 - dentistry</json:string></scienceMetrix><scopus><json:string>1 - Health Sciences</json:string><json:string>2 - Dentistry</json:string><json:string>3 - Oral Surgery</json:string></scopus></categories><publicationDate>2012</publicationDate><copyrightDate>2012</copyrightDate><doi><json:string>10.1111/j.1600-0501.2011.02180.x</json:string></doi><id>CA1E92F94B47705DE9A27E46B4A1A024D4BE492D</id><score>1</score><fulltext><json:item><extension>pdf</extension><original>true</original><mimetype>application/pdf</mimetype><uri>https://api.istex.fr/document/CA1E92F94B47705DE9A27E46B4A1A024D4BE492D/fulltext/pdf</uri></json:item><json:item><extension>zip</extension><original>false</original><mimetype>application/zip</mimetype><uri>https://api.istex.fr/document/CA1E92F94B47705DE9A27E46B4A1A024D4BE492D/fulltext/zip</uri></json:item><istex:fulltextTEI uri="https://api.istex.fr/document/CA1E92F94B47705DE9A27E46B4A1A024D4BE492D/fulltext/tei"><teiHeader><fileDesc><titleStmt><title level="a" type="main">Implant image quality in dental radiographs recorded using a customized imaging guide or a standard film holder</title></titleStmt><publicationStmt><authority>ISTEX</authority><publisher>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</publisher><pubPlace>Oxford, UK</pubPlace><availability><licence>© 2011 John Wiley & Sons A/S</licence></availability><date type="published" when="2012-01"></date></publicationStmt><notesStmt><note type="content-type" subtype="article" source="article" scheme="https://content-type.data.istex.fr/ark:/67375/XTP-6N5SZHKN-D">article</note><note type="publication-type" subtype="journal" scheme="https://publication-type.data.istex.fr/ark:/67375/JMC-0GLKJH51-B">journal</note></notesStmt><sourceDesc><biblStruct type="article"><analytic><title level="a" type="main">Implant image quality in dental radiographs recorded using a customized imaging guide or a standard film holder</title><title level="a" type="short">Implant image quality in radiographs using a customized imaging guide</title><author xml:id="author-0000"><persName><forename type="first">Lars</forename><surname>Schropp</surname></persName><affiliation>Department of Prosthetic Dentistry, School of Dentistry, Aarhus University, Aarhus C, Denmark<address><country key="DK"></country></address></affiliation></author><author xml:id="author-0001"><persName><forename type="first">Andreas</forename><surname>Stavropoulos</surname></persName><affiliation>Department of Periodontology, School of Dentistry, Aarhus University, Aarhus C, Denmark<address><country key="DK"></country></address></affiliation></author><author xml:id="author-0002"><persName><forename type="first">Rubens</forename><surname>Spin‐Neto</surname></persName><affiliation>Department of Periodontology, Araraquara Dental School, UNESP – Univ. Estadual Paulista, Sao Paulo, SP, Brazil<address><country key="BR"></country></address></affiliation></author><author xml:id="author-0003"><persName><forename type="first">Ann</forename><surname>Wenzel</surname></persName><affiliation>Department of Oral Radiology, School of Dentistry, Aarhus University, Aarhus C, Denmark<address><country key="DK"></country></address></affiliation></author><idno type="istex">CA1E92F94B47705DE9A27E46B4A1A024D4BE492D</idno><idno type="ark">ark:/67375/WNG-9V2J0QS0-9</idno><idno type="DOI">10.1111/j.1600-0501.2011.02180.x</idno><idno type="unit">CLR2180</idno><idno type="toTypesetVersion">file:CLR.CLR2180.pdf</idno></analytic><monogr><title level="j" type="main">Clinical Oral Implants Research</title><title level="j" type="alt">CLINICAL ORAL IMPLANTS RESEARCH</title><idno type="pISSN">0905-7161</idno><idno type="eISSN">1600-0501</idno><idno type="book-DOI">10.1111/(ISSN)1600-0501</idno><idno type="book-part-DOI">10.1111/clr.2011.23.issue-1</idno><idno type="product">CLR</idno><idno type="publisherDivision">ST</idno><imprint><biblScope unit="vol">23</biblScope><biblScope unit="issue">1</biblScope><biblScope unit="page" from="55">55</biblScope><biblScope unit="page" to="59">59</biblScope><biblScope unit="page-count">5</biblScope><publisher>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</publisher><pubPlace>Oxford, UK</pubPlace><date type="published" when="2012-01"></date></imprint></monogr></biblStruct></sourceDesc></fileDesc><profileDesc><abstract xml:lang="en" style="main"><head>Abstract</head><p><hi rend="bold">Objective: </hi> To compare a customized imaging guide and a standard film holder for obtaining optimally projected intraoral radiographs of dental implants.</p><p><hi rend="bold">Material and methods: </hi> Intraoral radiographs of four screw‐type implants with different inclination placed in an upper or lower dental phantom model were recorded by 32 groups of examiners after a short instruction in the use of the RB‐RB/LB‐LB mnemonic rule. Half of the examiners recorded the images using a standard film holder and the other half used a customized imaging guide. Each radiograph was assessed under blinded conditions with regard to rendering of the implant threads and was assigned to one of four quality categories: (1) perfect, (2) not perfect, but clinically acceptable, (3) not acceptable, and (4) hopeless.</p><p><hi rend="bold">Results: </hi> For the upper jaw, the same number of exposures per implant were made to achieve an acceptable image (<hi rend="italic">P</hi>=0.86) by the <hi rend="italic">standard film holder method</hi> (median=2) and the <hi rend="italic">imaging guide method</hi> (median=2). For the lower jaw, medians for the <hi rend="italic">imaging guide method</hi> and the <hi rend="italic">film holder method</hi> were 1 and 2, respectively (<hi rend="italic">P</hi>=0.004). For the <hi rend="italic">imaging guide method</hi>, the first exposure was rated as perfect/acceptable in 62% of the cases and for the <hi rend="italic">film holder method</hi> in 41% of the cases (<hi rend="italic">P</hi>=0.013). After ≤2 exposures, 78% (<hi rend="italic">imaging guide method</hi>) and 69% (<hi rend="italic">film holder method</hi>) of the implant images were perfect/acceptable (<hi rend="italic">P</hi>=0.23). The implant inclination did not have a major influence on the outcomes.</p><p><hi rend="bold">Conclusion: </hi> Perfect or acceptable images were achieved after two exposures with the same frequency either using a customized imaging guide method or a <hi rend="italic">standard film holder method</hi>. However, the use of a <hi rend="italic">customized imaging guide method</hi> was overall significantly superior to a <hi rend="italic">standard film holder method</hi> in terms of obtaining perfect or acceptable images with only one exposure.</p><p><hi rend="bold">To cite this article:</hi>
Schropp L, Stavropoulos A, Spin‐Neto R, Wenzel A. Implant image quality in dental radiographs recorded using a customized imaging guide or a standard film holder.
<hi rend="italic">Clin. Oral Impl. Res</hi>. <hi rend="bold">23</hi>, 2012; 55–59.
doi: 10.1111/j.1600‐0501.2011.02180.x</p></abstract><textClass><keywords xml:lang="en"><term xml:id="k1">dental</term><term xml:id="k2">imaging guide</term><term xml:id="k3">implant</term><term xml:id="k4">intraoral</term><term xml:id="k5">radiography</term></keywords><keywords rend="tocHeading1"><term>Original Articles</term></keywords></textClass><langUsage><language ident="en"></language></langUsage></profileDesc></teiHeader></istex:fulltextTEI><json:item><extension>txt</extension><original>false</original><mimetype>text/plain</mimetype><uri>https://api.istex.fr/document/CA1E92F94B47705DE9A27E46B4A1A024D4BE492D/fulltext/txt</uri></json:item></fulltext><metadata><istex:metadataXml wicri:clean="Wiley, elements deleted: body"><istex:xmlDeclaration>version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" standalone="yes"</istex:xmlDeclaration><istex:document><component version="2.0" type="serialArticle" xml:lang="en"><header><publicationMeta level="product"><publisherInfo><publisherName>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</publisherName><publisherLoc>Oxford, UK</publisherLoc></publisherInfo><doi origin="wiley" registered="yes">10.1111/(ISSN)1600-0501</doi><issn type="print">0905-7161</issn><issn type="electronic">1600-0501</issn><idGroup><id type="product" value="CLR"></id><id type="publisherDivision" value="ST"></id></idGroup><titleGroup><title type="main" sort="CLINICAL ORAL IMPLANTS RESEARCH">Clinical Oral Implants Research</title></titleGroup></publicationMeta><publicationMeta level="part" position="01101"><doi origin="wiley">10.1111/clr.2011.23.issue-1</doi><numberingGroup><numbering type="journalVolume" number="23">23</numbering><numbering type="journalIssue" number="1">1</numbering></numberingGroup><coverDate startDate="2012-01">January 2012</coverDate></publicationMeta><publicationMeta level="unit" type="article" position="9" status="forIssue"><doi origin="wiley">10.1111/j.1600-0501.2011.02180.x</doi><idGroup><id type="unit" value="CLR2180"></id></idGroup><countGroup><count type="pageTotal" number="5"></count></countGroup><titleGroup><title type="tocHeading1">Original Articles</title></titleGroup><copyright>© 2011 John Wiley & Sons A/S</copyright><eventGroup><event type="xmlConverted" agent="Converter:BPG_TO_WML3G version:2.9.1 mode:FullText" date="2011-12-15"></event><event agent="SPS" date="2011-12-15" type="xmlCorrected"></event><event type="publishedOnlineEarlyUnpaginated" date="2011-04-13"></event><event type="firstOnline" date="2011-04-13"></event><event type="publishedOnlineFinalForm" date="2011-12-19"></event><event type="xmlConverted" agent="Converter:WILEY_ML3G_TO_WILEY_ML3GV2 version:4.0.1" date="2014-03-12"></event><event type="xmlConverted" agent="Converter:WML3G_To_WML3G version:4.3.4 mode:FullText" date="2015-02-25"></event></eventGroup><numberingGroup><numbering type="pageFirst" number="55">55</numbering><numbering type="pageLast" number="59">59</numbering></numberingGroup><correspondenceTo><b>Corresponding author:</b>
<i>Lars Schropp</i>
Department of Prosthetic Dentistry
School of Dentistry
Aarhus University
Vennelyst Boulevard 9
8000 Aarhus C
Denmark
Tel.: +0045 89 42 40 48
Fax: +0045 86 19 56 65
e‐mail: <email normalForm="lars.schropp@odontologi.au.dk">lars.schropp@odontologi.au.dk</email></correspondenceTo><linkGroup><link type="toTypesetVersion" href="file:CLR.CLR2180.pdf"></link></linkGroup></publicationMeta><contentMeta><unparsedEditorialHistory><b>Date:</b>, Accepted 23 January 2011</unparsedEditorialHistory><countGroup><count type="figureTotal" number="3"></count><count type="tableTotal" number="5"></count><count type="formulaTotal" number="0"></count><count type="referenceTotal" number="8"></count><count type="wordTotal" number="4469"></count><count type="linksCrossRef" number="17"></count></countGroup><titleGroup><title type="main">Implant image quality in dental radiographs recorded using a customized imaging guide or a standard film holder</title><title type="shortAuthors">Schropp et al.</title><title type="short">Implant image quality in radiographs using a customized imaging guide</title></titleGroup><creators><creator creatorRole="author" xml:id="cr1" affiliationRef="#a1"><personName><givenNames>Lars</givenNames><familyName>Schropp</familyName></personName></creator><creator creatorRole="author" xml:id="cr2" affiliationRef="#a2"><personName><givenNames>Andreas</givenNames><familyName>Stavropoulos</familyName></personName></creator><creator creatorRole="author" xml:id="cr3" affiliationRef="#a3"><personName><givenNames>Rubens</givenNames><familyName>Spin‐Neto</familyName></personName></creator><creator creatorRole="author" xml:id="cr4" affiliationRef="#a4"><personName><givenNames>Ann</givenNames><familyName>Wenzel</familyName></personName></creator></creators><affiliationGroup><affiliation xml:id="a1" countryCode="DK"><unparsedAffiliation>Department of Prosthetic Dentistry, School of Dentistry, Aarhus University, Aarhus C, Denmark</unparsedAffiliation></affiliation><affiliation xml:id="a2" countryCode="DK"><unparsedAffiliation>Department of Periodontology, School of Dentistry, Aarhus University, Aarhus C, Denmark</unparsedAffiliation></affiliation><affiliation xml:id="a3" countryCode="BR"><unparsedAffiliation>Department of Periodontology, Araraquara Dental School, UNESP – Univ. Estadual Paulista, Sao Paulo, SP, Brazil</unparsedAffiliation></affiliation><affiliation xml:id="a4" countryCode="DK"><unparsedAffiliation>Department of Oral Radiology, School of Dentistry, Aarhus University, Aarhus C, Denmark</unparsedAffiliation></affiliation></affiliationGroup><keywordGroup xml:lang="en"><keyword xml:id="k1">dental</keyword><keyword xml:id="k2">imaging guide</keyword><keyword xml:id="k3">implant</keyword><keyword xml:id="k4">intraoral</keyword><keyword xml:id="k5">radiography</keyword></keywordGroup><abstractGroup><abstract type="main" xml:lang="en"><title type="main">Abstract</title><p><b>Objective: </b> To compare a customized imaging guide and a standard film holder for obtaining optimally projected intraoral radiographs of dental implants.</p><p><b>Material and methods: </b> Intraoral radiographs of four screw‐type implants with different inclination placed in an upper or lower dental phantom model were recorded by 32 groups of examiners after a short instruction in the use of the RB‐RB/LB‐LB mnemonic rule. Half of the examiners recorded the images using a standard film holder and the other half used a customized imaging guide. Each radiograph was assessed under blinded conditions with regard to rendering of the implant threads and was assigned to one of four quality categories: (1) perfect, (2) not perfect, but clinically acceptable, (3) not acceptable, and (4) hopeless.</p><p><b>Results: </b> For the upper jaw, the same number of exposures per implant were made to achieve an acceptable image (<i>P</i>=0.86) by the <i>standard film holder method</i> (median=2) and the <i>imaging guide method</i> (median=2). For the lower jaw, medians for the <i>imaging guide method</i> and the <i>film holder method</i> were 1 and 2, respectively (<i>P</i>=0.004). For the <i>imaging guide method</i>, the first exposure was rated as perfect/acceptable in 62% of the cases and for the <i>film holder method</i> in 41% of the cases (<i>P</i>=0.013). After ≤2 exposures, 78% (<i>imaging guide method</i>) and 69% (<i>film holder method</i>) of the implant images were perfect/acceptable (<i>P</i>=0.23). The implant inclination did not have a major influence on the outcomes.</p><p><b>Conclusion: </b> Perfect or acceptable images were achieved after two exposures with the same frequency either using a customized imaging guide method or a <i>standard film holder method</i>. However, the use of a <i>customized imaging guide method</i> was overall significantly superior to a <i>standard film holder method</i> in terms of obtaining perfect or acceptable images with only one exposure.</p><p><b>To cite this article:</b>
Schropp L, Stavropoulos A, Spin‐Neto R, Wenzel A. Implant image quality in dental radiographs recorded using a customized imaging guide or a standard film holder.
<i>Clin. Oral Impl. Res</i>. <b>23</b>, 2012; 55–59.
doi: 10.1111/j.1600‐0501.2011.02180.x</p></abstract></abstractGroup></contentMeta></header></component></istex:document></istex:metadataXml><mods version="3.6"><titleInfo lang="en"><title>Implant image quality in dental radiographs recorded using a customized imaging guide or a standard film holder</title></titleInfo><titleInfo type="abbreviated" lang="en"><title>Implant image quality in radiographs using a customized imaging guide</title></titleInfo><titleInfo type="alternative" contentType="CDATA" lang="en"><title>Implant image quality in dental radiographs recorded using a customized imaging guide or a standard film holder</title></titleInfo><name type="personal"><namePart type="given">Lars</namePart><namePart type="family">Schropp</namePart><affiliation>Department of Prosthetic Dentistry, School of Dentistry, Aarhus University, Aarhus C, Denmark</affiliation><role><roleTerm type="text">author</roleTerm></role></name><name type="personal"><namePart type="given">Andreas</namePart><namePart type="family">Stavropoulos</namePart><affiliation>Department of Periodontology, School of Dentistry, Aarhus University, Aarhus C, Denmark</affiliation><role><roleTerm type="text">author</roleTerm></role></name><name type="personal"><namePart type="given">Rubens</namePart><namePart type="family">Spin‐Neto</namePart><affiliation>Department of Periodontology, Araraquara Dental School, UNESP – Univ. Estadual Paulista, Sao Paulo, SP, Brazil</affiliation><role><roleTerm type="text">author</roleTerm></role></name><name type="personal"><namePart type="given">Ann</namePart><namePart type="family">Wenzel</namePart><affiliation>Department of Oral Radiology, School of Dentistry, Aarhus University, Aarhus C, Denmark</affiliation><role><roleTerm type="text">author</roleTerm></role></name><typeOfResource>text</typeOfResource><genre type="article" displayLabel="article" authority="ISTEX" authorityURI="https://content-type.data.istex.fr" valueURI="https://content-type.data.istex.fr/ark:/67375/XTP-6N5SZHKN-D">article</genre><originInfo><publisher>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</publisher><place><placeTerm type="text">Oxford, UK</placeTerm></place><dateIssued encoding="w3cdtf">2012-01</dateIssued><edition>Date:, Accepted 23 January 2011</edition><copyrightDate encoding="w3cdtf">2012</copyrightDate></originInfo><language><languageTerm type="code" authority="rfc3066">en</languageTerm><languageTerm type="code" authority="iso639-2b">eng</languageTerm></language><physicalDescription><extent unit="figures">3</extent><extent unit="tables">5</extent><extent unit="formulas">0</extent><extent unit="references">8</extent><extent unit="linksCrossRef">17</extent><extent unit="words">4469</extent></physicalDescription><abstract>Objective: To compare a customized imaging guide and a standard film holder for obtaining optimally projected intraoral radiographs of dental implants.</abstract><abstract>Material and methods: Intraoral radiographs of four screw‐type implants with different inclination placed in an upper or lower dental phantom model were recorded by 32 groups of examiners after a short instruction in the use of the RB‐RB/LB‐LB mnemonic rule. Half of the examiners recorded the images using a standard film holder and the other half used a customized imaging guide. Each radiograph was assessed under blinded conditions with regard to rendering of the implant threads and was assigned to one of four quality categories: (1) perfect, (2) not perfect, but clinically acceptable, (3) not acceptable, and (4) hopeless.</abstract><abstract>Results: For the upper jaw, the same number of exposures per implant were made to achieve an acceptable image (P=0.86) by the standard film holder method (median=2) and the imaging guide method (median=2). For the lower jaw, medians for the imaging guide method and the film holder method were 1 and 2, respectively (P=0.004). For the imaging guide method, the first exposure was rated as perfect/acceptable in 62% of the cases and for the film holder method in 41% of the cases (P=0.013). After ≤2 exposures, 78% (imaging guide method) and 69% (film holder method) of the implant images were perfect/acceptable (P=0.23). The implant inclination did not have a major influence on the outcomes.</abstract><abstract>Conclusion: Perfect or acceptable images were achieved after two exposures with the same frequency either using a customized imaging guide method or a standard film holder method. However, the use of a customized imaging guide method was overall significantly superior to a standard film holder method in terms of obtaining perfect or acceptable images with only one exposure.</abstract><abstract>To cite this article:
Schropp L, Stavropoulos A, Spin‐Neto R, Wenzel A. Implant image quality in dental radiographs recorded using a customized imaging guide or a standard film holder.
Clin. Oral Impl. Res. 23, 2012; 55–59.
doi: 10.1111/j.1600‐0501.2011.02180.x</abstract><subject lang="en"><genre>keywords</genre><topic>dental</topic><topic>imaging guide</topic><topic>implant</topic><topic>intraoral</topic><topic>radiography</topic></subject><relatedItem type="host"><titleInfo><title>Clinical Oral Implants Research</title></titleInfo><genre type="journal" authority="ISTEX" authorityURI="https://publication-type.data.istex.fr" valueURI="https://publication-type.data.istex.fr/ark:/67375/JMC-0GLKJH51-B">journal</genre><identifier type="ISSN">0905-7161</identifier><identifier type="eISSN">1600-0501</identifier><identifier type="DOI">10.1111/(ISSN)1600-0501</identifier><identifier type="PublisherID">CLR</identifier><part><date>2012</date><detail type="volume"><caption>vol.</caption><number>23</number></detail><detail type="issue"><caption>no.</caption><number>1</number></detail><extent unit="pages"><start>55</start><end>59</end><total>5</total></extent></part></relatedItem><identifier type="istex">CA1E92F94B47705DE9A27E46B4A1A024D4BE492D</identifier><identifier type="ark">ark:/67375/WNG-9V2J0QS0-9</identifier><identifier type="DOI">10.1111/j.1600-0501.2011.02180.x</identifier><identifier type="ArticleID">CLR2180</identifier><accessCondition type="use and reproduction" contentType="copyright">© 2011 John Wiley & Sons A/S</accessCondition><recordInfo><recordContentSource authority="ISTEX" authorityURI="https://loaded-corpus.data.istex.fr" valueURI="https://loaded-corpus.data.istex.fr/ark:/67375/XBH-L0C46X92-X">wiley</recordContentSource><recordOrigin>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</recordOrigin></recordInfo></mods><json:item><extension>json</extension><original>false</original><mimetype>application/json</mimetype><uri>https://api.istex.fr/document/CA1E92F94B47705DE9A27E46B4A1A024D4BE492D/metadata/json</uri></json:item></metadata><serie></serie></istex></record>Pour manipuler ce document sous Unix (Dilib)
EXPLOR_STEP=$WICRI_ROOT/Wicri/Santé/explor/EdenteV2/Data/Istex/Corpus
HfdSelect -h $EXPLOR_STEP/biblio.hfd -nk 006449 | SxmlIndent | more
Ou
HfdSelect -h $EXPLOR_AREA/Data/Istex/Corpus/biblio.hfd -nk 006449 | SxmlIndent | more
Pour mettre un lien sur cette page dans le réseau Wicri
{{Explor lien
|wiki= Wicri/Santé
|area= EdenteV2
|flux= Istex
|étape= Corpus
|type= RBID
|clé= ISTEX:CA1E92F94B47705DE9A27E46B4A1A024D4BE492D
|texte= Implant image quality in dental radiographs recorded using a customized imaging guide or a standard film holder
}}
| This area was generated with Dilib version V0.6.32. |  |