Peri‐implant maintenance of immediate function implants: a pilot study comparing hyaluronic acid and chlorhexidine
Identifieur interne : 006436 ( Istex/Corpus ); précédent : 006435; suivant : 006437Peri‐implant maintenance of immediate function implants: a pilot study comparing hyaluronic acid and chlorhexidine
Auteurs : M. De Araújo Nobre ; N. Cintra ; P. MalSource :
- International Journal of Dental Hygiene [ 1601-5029 ] ; 2007-05.
English descriptors
- KwdEn :
- Abutment teeth, Anterior implants, Araujo, Araujo nobre, Axial implant, Axial implants, Bacteriostatic effect, Buccal epithelial cells, Chlorhexidine, Clin, Clin impl dent relat, Clinical evaluation parameters, Clinical study, Clinical trial, Daily implant, Days postoperatively, Delmopinol hydrochloride, Dent, Dent hygiene, Dental plaque, Fourth observation, Gingival, Good results, Groups group, Healing period, Healing phase, Health status, Home care, Hyaluronic, Hyaluronic acid, Hygiene, Immediate function, Immediate function implants, Implant, Implant level, Implant maintenance, Implant maintenance protocol, Keltjens hmam, Maintenance appointments, Maintenance protocol, Malo, Months observation mpli, Mpli, Negative correlation, Nobre, Oral hygiene, Oral implants, Osseointegrated implants, Patient level, Patient procedures, Periodontal, Periodontal disease, Periodontal healing, Periodontal treatment, Pilot study, Plaque, Positive correlation, Possible mechanisms, Potential role, Private practice, Quadrant, Radiological, Radiological parameters, Same distribution, Second observation, Soft tissues, Spearman correlation, Study population, Time frame, Transl attualita terapeutica.
- Teeft :
- Abutment teeth, Anterior implants, Araujo, Araujo nobre, Axial implant, Axial implants, Bacteriostatic effect, Buccal epithelial cells, Chlorhexidine, Clin, Clin impl dent relat, Clinical evaluation parameters, Clinical study, Clinical trial, Daily implant, Days postoperatively, Delmopinol hydrochloride, Dent, Dent hygiene, Dental plaque, Fourth observation, Gingival, Good results, Groups group, Healing period, Healing phase, Health status, Home care, Hyaluronic, Hyaluronic acid, Hygiene, Immediate function, Immediate function implants, Implant, Implant level, Implant maintenance, Implant maintenance protocol, Keltjens hmam, Maintenance appointments, Maintenance protocol, Malo, Months observation mpli, Mpli, Negative correlation, Nobre, Oral hygiene, Oral implants, Osseointegrated implants, Patient level, Patient procedures, Periodontal, Periodontal disease, Periodontal healing, Periodontal treatment, Pilot study, Plaque, Positive correlation, Possible mechanisms, Potential role, Private practice, Quadrant, Radiological, Radiological parameters, Same distribution, Second observation, Soft tissues, Spearman correlation, Study population, Time frame, Transl attualita terapeutica.
Abstract
Abstract: Introduction: In implants, maintenance assumes an important role. The role of chlorhexidine (CHX) is well known in maintenance, while only limited evidence exists on the practical use of hyaluronic acid (HA). The objective of this study was to compare the health status of the peri‐implant complex (hard and soft tissues surrounding the implant) during the healing period of immediate function implants, using HA or CHX gels in the patient's maintenance protocol.Study population and methodology: Thirty complete edentulous patients, with four immediate function Brånemark System implants placed in the mandible (total of 120 implants), were randomly assigned to two groups (HA and CHX) using only these two chemicals in their daily implant self‐care. Both groups were followed up for 6 months, with clinical observations on the 10th day, 2 months, 4 months and 6 months post‐surgically.Results: During the course of the study, HA and CHX produced good results in maintaining a healthy peri‐implant complex in immediate function implants for complete rehabilitations in the edentulous mandible. Statistically significant differences were found in favour of the HA group in the modified bleeding index on the second observation (P = 0.003). The difference was more marked in the axial implants placed in the fifth sextant (P = 0.05). Correlation coefficient between plaque and bleeding index revealed a potentially better result for CHX at 6 months.Conclusion: The findings point out the importance of a maintenance protocol in immediate function implants. Both chemicals are valid tools for implant maintenance. The authors suggest that it might be advantageous to administer HA in the first 2 months and CHX between 2 and 6 months.
Url:
DOI: 10.1111/j.1601-5037.2007.00239.x
Links to Exploration step
ISTEX:C9D749CC50E692B020B183074C53AAF15BA6E5C4Le document en format XML
<record><TEI wicri:istexFullTextTei="biblStruct"><teiHeader><fileDesc><titleStmt><title xml:lang="en">Peri‐implant maintenance of immediate function implants: a pilot study comparing hyaluronic acid and chlorhexidine</title><author><name sortKey="De Araujo Nobre, M" sort="De Araujo Nobre, M" uniqKey="De Araujo Nobre M" first="M" last="De Araújo Nobre">M. De Araújo Nobre</name><affiliation><mods:affiliation>Miguel de Araújo Nobre, Private Practice, Department of Oral Hygiene, Department of Clinical Research, Clínica Maló, Lisbon, PortugalNuno Cintra, Private Practice, Department of Oral Surgery, Clínica Maló, Lisbon, PortugalPaulo Maló, Private Practice, Department of Implantology and Prosthodontics, Clínica Maló, Lisbon, Portugal</mods:affiliation></affiliation></author><author><name sortKey="Cintra, N" sort="Cintra, N" uniqKey="Cintra N" first="N" last="Cintra">N. Cintra</name><affiliation><mods:affiliation>Miguel de Araújo Nobre, Private Practice, Department of Oral Hygiene, Department of Clinical Research, Clínica Maló, Lisbon, PortugalNuno Cintra, Private Practice, Department of Oral Surgery, Clínica Maló, Lisbon, PortugalPaulo Maló, Private Practice, Department of Implantology and Prosthodontics, Clínica Maló, Lisbon, Portugal</mods:affiliation></affiliation></author><author><name sortKey="Mal, P" sort="Mal, P" uniqKey="Mal P" first="P" last="Mal">P. Mal</name><affiliation><mods:affiliation>Miguel de Araújo Nobre, Private Practice, Department of Oral Hygiene, Department of Clinical Research, Clínica Maló, Lisbon, PortugalNuno Cintra, Private Practice, Department of Oral Surgery, Clínica Maló, Lisbon, PortugalPaulo Maló, Private Practice, Department of Implantology and Prosthodontics, Clínica Maló, Lisbon, Portugal</mods:affiliation></affiliation></author></titleStmt><publicationStmt><idno type="wicri:source">ISTEX</idno><idno type="RBID">ISTEX:C9D749CC50E692B020B183074C53AAF15BA6E5C4</idno><date when="2007" year="2007">2007</date><idno type="doi">10.1111/j.1601-5037.2007.00239.x</idno><idno type="url">https://api.istex.fr/document/C9D749CC50E692B020B183074C53AAF15BA6E5C4/fulltext/pdf</idno><idno type="wicri:Area/Istex/Corpus">006436</idno><idno type="wicri:explorRef" wicri:stream="Istex" wicri:step="Corpus" wicri:corpus="ISTEX">006436</idno></publicationStmt><sourceDesc><biblStruct><analytic><title level="a" type="main">Peri‐implant maintenance of immediate function implants: a pilot study comparing hyaluronic acid and chlorhexidine</title><author><name sortKey="De Araujo Nobre, M" sort="De Araujo Nobre, M" uniqKey="De Araujo Nobre M" first="M" last="De Araújo Nobre">M. De Araújo Nobre</name><affiliation><mods:affiliation>Miguel de Araújo Nobre, Private Practice, Department of Oral Hygiene, Department of Clinical Research, Clínica Maló, Lisbon, PortugalNuno Cintra, Private Practice, Department of Oral Surgery, Clínica Maló, Lisbon, PortugalPaulo Maló, Private Practice, Department of Implantology and Prosthodontics, Clínica Maló, Lisbon, Portugal</mods:affiliation></affiliation></author><author><name sortKey="Cintra, N" sort="Cintra, N" uniqKey="Cintra N" first="N" last="Cintra">N. Cintra</name><affiliation><mods:affiliation>Miguel de Araújo Nobre, Private Practice, Department of Oral Hygiene, Department of Clinical Research, Clínica Maló, Lisbon, PortugalNuno Cintra, Private Practice, Department of Oral Surgery, Clínica Maló, Lisbon, PortugalPaulo Maló, Private Practice, Department of Implantology and Prosthodontics, Clínica Maló, Lisbon, Portugal</mods:affiliation></affiliation></author><author><name sortKey="Mal, P" sort="Mal, P" uniqKey="Mal P" first="P" last="Mal">P. Mal</name><affiliation><mods:affiliation>Miguel de Araújo Nobre, Private Practice, Department of Oral Hygiene, Department of Clinical Research, Clínica Maló, Lisbon, PortugalNuno Cintra, Private Practice, Department of Oral Surgery, Clínica Maló, Lisbon, PortugalPaulo Maló, Private Practice, Department of Implantology and Prosthodontics, Clínica Maló, Lisbon, Portugal</mods:affiliation></affiliation></author></analytic><monogr></monogr><series><title level="j" type="main">International Journal of Dental Hygiene</title><title level="j" type="alt">INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF DENTAL HYGIENE</title><idno type="ISSN">1601-5029</idno><idno type="eISSN">1601-5037</idno><imprint><biblScope unit="vol">5</biblScope><biblScope unit="issue">2</biblScope><biblScope unit="page" from="87">87</biblScope><biblScope unit="page" to="94">94</biblScope><biblScope unit="page-count">8</biblScope><publisher>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</publisher><pubPlace>Oxford, UK</pubPlace><date type="published" when="2007-05">2007-05</date></imprint><idno type="ISSN">1601-5029</idno></series></biblStruct></sourceDesc><seriesStmt><idno type="ISSN">1601-5029</idno></seriesStmt></fileDesc><profileDesc><textClass><keywords scheme="KwdEn" xml:lang="en"><term>Abutment teeth</term><term>Anterior implants</term><term>Araujo</term><term>Araujo nobre</term><term>Axial implant</term><term>Axial implants</term><term>Bacteriostatic effect</term><term>Buccal epithelial cells</term><term>Chlorhexidine</term><term>Clin</term><term>Clin impl dent relat</term><term>Clinical evaluation parameters</term><term>Clinical study</term><term>Clinical trial</term><term>Daily implant</term><term>Days postoperatively</term><term>Delmopinol hydrochloride</term><term>Dent</term><term>Dent hygiene</term><term>Dental plaque</term><term>Fourth observation</term><term>Gingival</term><term>Good results</term><term>Groups group</term><term>Healing period</term><term>Healing phase</term><term>Health status</term><term>Home care</term><term>Hyaluronic</term><term>Hyaluronic acid</term><term>Hygiene</term><term>Immediate function</term><term>Immediate function implants</term><term>Implant</term><term>Implant level</term><term>Implant maintenance</term><term>Implant maintenance protocol</term><term>Keltjens hmam</term><term>Maintenance appointments</term><term>Maintenance protocol</term><term>Malo</term><term>Months observation mpli</term><term>Mpli</term><term>Negative correlation</term><term>Nobre</term><term>Oral hygiene</term><term>Oral implants</term><term>Osseointegrated implants</term><term>Patient level</term><term>Patient procedures</term><term>Periodontal</term><term>Periodontal disease</term><term>Periodontal healing</term><term>Periodontal treatment</term><term>Pilot study</term><term>Plaque</term><term>Positive correlation</term><term>Possible mechanisms</term><term>Potential role</term><term>Private practice</term><term>Quadrant</term><term>Radiological</term><term>Radiological parameters</term><term>Same distribution</term><term>Second observation</term><term>Soft tissues</term><term>Spearman correlation</term><term>Study population</term><term>Time frame</term><term>Transl attualita terapeutica</term></keywords><keywords scheme="Teeft" xml:lang="en"><term>Abutment teeth</term><term>Anterior implants</term><term>Araujo</term><term>Araujo nobre</term><term>Axial implant</term><term>Axial implants</term><term>Bacteriostatic effect</term><term>Buccal epithelial cells</term><term>Chlorhexidine</term><term>Clin</term><term>Clin impl dent relat</term><term>Clinical evaluation parameters</term><term>Clinical study</term><term>Clinical trial</term><term>Daily implant</term><term>Days postoperatively</term><term>Delmopinol hydrochloride</term><term>Dent</term><term>Dent hygiene</term><term>Dental plaque</term><term>Fourth observation</term><term>Gingival</term><term>Good results</term><term>Groups group</term><term>Healing period</term><term>Healing phase</term><term>Health status</term><term>Home care</term><term>Hyaluronic</term><term>Hyaluronic acid</term><term>Hygiene</term><term>Immediate function</term><term>Immediate function implants</term><term>Implant</term><term>Implant level</term><term>Implant maintenance</term><term>Implant maintenance protocol</term><term>Keltjens hmam</term><term>Maintenance appointments</term><term>Maintenance protocol</term><term>Malo</term><term>Months observation mpli</term><term>Mpli</term><term>Negative correlation</term><term>Nobre</term><term>Oral hygiene</term><term>Oral implants</term><term>Osseointegrated implants</term><term>Patient level</term><term>Patient procedures</term><term>Periodontal</term><term>Periodontal disease</term><term>Periodontal healing</term><term>Periodontal treatment</term><term>Pilot study</term><term>Plaque</term><term>Positive correlation</term><term>Possible mechanisms</term><term>Potential role</term><term>Private practice</term><term>Quadrant</term><term>Radiological</term><term>Radiological parameters</term><term>Same distribution</term><term>Second observation</term><term>Soft tissues</term><term>Spearman correlation</term><term>Study population</term><term>Time frame</term><term>Transl attualita terapeutica</term></keywords></textClass></profileDesc></teiHeader><front><div type="abstract">Abstract: Introduction: In implants, maintenance assumes an important role. The role of chlorhexidine (CHX) is well known in maintenance, while only limited evidence exists on the practical use of hyaluronic acid (HA). The objective of this study was to compare the health status of the peri‐implant complex (hard and soft tissues surrounding the implant) during the healing period of immediate function implants, using HA or CHX gels in the patient's maintenance protocol.Study population and methodology: Thirty complete edentulous patients, with four immediate function Brånemark System implants placed in the mandible (total of 120 implants), were randomly assigned to two groups (HA and CHX) using only these two chemicals in their daily implant self‐care. Both groups were followed up for 6 months, with clinical observations on the 10th day, 2 months, 4 months and 6 months post‐surgically.Results: During the course of the study, HA and CHX produced good results in maintaining a healthy peri‐implant complex in immediate function implants for complete rehabilitations in the edentulous mandible. Statistically significant differences were found in favour of the HA group in the modified bleeding index on the second observation (P = 0.003). The difference was more marked in the axial implants placed in the fifth sextant (P = 0.05). Correlation coefficient between plaque and bleeding index revealed a potentially better result for CHX at 6 months.Conclusion: The findings point out the importance of a maintenance protocol in immediate function implants. Both chemicals are valid tools for implant maintenance. The authors suggest that it might be advantageous to administer HA in the first 2 months and CHX between 2 and 6 months.</div></front></TEI><istex><corpusName>wiley</corpusName><keywords><teeft><json:string>implant</json:string><json:string>mpli</json:string><json:string>chlorhexidine</json:string><json:string>nobre</json:string><json:string>hyaluronic</json:string><json:string>hyaluronic acid</json:string><json:string>clin</json:string><json:string>araujo</json:string><json:string>malo</json:string><json:string>periodontal</json:string><json:string>araujo nobre</json:string><json:string>quadrant</json:string><json:string>immediate function implants</json:string><json:string>gingival</json:string><json:string>dental plaque</json:string><json:string>dent hygiene</json:string><json:string>oral hygiene</json:string><json:string>radiological</json:string><json:string>implant maintenance protocol</json:string><json:string>plaque</json:string><json:string>hygiene</json:string><json:string>immediate function</json:string><json:string>second observation</json:string><json:string>fourth observation</json:string><json:string>health status</json:string><json:string>private practice</json:string><json:string>dent</json:string><json:string>patient level</json:string><json:string>radiological parameters</json:string><json:string>months observation mpli</json:string><json:string>clinical evaluation parameters</json:string><json:string>periodontal disease</json:string><json:string>implant maintenance</json:string><json:string>implant level</json:string><json:string>anterior implants</json:string><json:string>soft tissues</json:string><json:string>osseointegrated implants</json:string><json:string>groups group</json:string><json:string>same distribution</json:string><json:string>healing phase</json:string><json:string>oral implants</json:string><json:string>days postoperatively</json:string><json:string>maintenance appointments</json:string><json:string>axial implants</json:string><json:string>good results</json:string><json:string>patient procedures</json:string><json:string>daily implant</json:string><json:string>study population</json:string><json:string>maintenance protocol</json:string><json:string>spearman correlation</json:string><json:string>positive correlation</json:string><json:string>healing period</json:string><json:string>bacteriostatic effect</json:string><json:string>negative correlation</json:string><json:string>periodontal treatment</json:string><json:string>axial implant</json:string><json:string>home care</json:string><json:string>pilot study</json:string><json:string>possible mechanisms</json:string><json:string>time frame</json:string><json:string>clin impl dent relat</json:string><json:string>potential role</json:string><json:string>periodontal healing</json:string><json:string>clinical trial</json:string><json:string>transl attualita terapeutica</json:string><json:string>buccal epithelial cells</json:string><json:string>keltjens hmam</json:string><json:string>abutment teeth</json:string><json:string>clinical study</json:string><json:string>delmopinol hydrochloride</json:string></teeft></keywords><author><json:item><name>M De Araújo Nobre</name><affiliations><json:string>Miguel de Araújo Nobre, Private Practice, Department of Oral Hygiene, Department of Clinical Research, Clínica Maló, Lisbon, PortugalNuno Cintra, Private Practice, Department of Oral Surgery, Clínica Maló, Lisbon, PortugalPaulo Maló, Private Practice, Department of Implantology and Prosthodontics, Clínica Maló, Lisbon, Portugal</json:string></affiliations></json:item><json:item><name>N Cintra</name><affiliations><json:string>Miguel de Araújo Nobre, Private Practice, Department of Oral Hygiene, Department of Clinical Research, Clínica Maló, Lisbon, PortugalNuno Cintra, Private Practice, Department of Oral Surgery, Clínica Maló, Lisbon, PortugalPaulo Maló, Private Practice, Department of Implantology and Prosthodontics, Clínica Maló, Lisbon, Portugal</json:string></affiliations></json:item><json:item><name>P Maló</name><affiliations><json:string>Miguel de Araújo Nobre, Private Practice, Department of Oral Hygiene, Department of Clinical Research, Clínica Maló, Lisbon, PortugalNuno Cintra, Private Practice, Department of Oral Surgery, Clínica Maló, Lisbon, PortugalPaulo Maló, Private Practice, Department of Implantology and Prosthodontics, Clínica Maló, Lisbon, Portugal</json:string></affiliations></json:item></author><subject><json:item><lang><json:string>eng</json:string></lang><value>axial implants</value></json:item><json:item><lang><json:string>eng</json:string></lang><value>chlorhexidine</value></json:item><json:item><lang><json:string>eng</json:string></lang><value>gel</value></json:item><json:item><lang><json:string>eng</json:string></lang><value>hyaluronic acid</value></json:item><json:item><lang><json:string>eng</json:string></lang><value>immediate function</value></json:item><json:item><lang><json:string>eng</json:string></lang><value>maintenance</value></json:item><json:item><lang><json:string>eng</json:string></lang><value>oral hygiene</value></json:item><json:item><lang><json:string>eng</json:string></lang><value>oral implants</value></json:item><json:item><lang><json:string>eng</json:string></lang><value>tilted implants</value></json:item></subject><articleId><json:string>IDH239</json:string></articleId><arkIstex>ark:/67375/WNG-7G7KJQKX-9</arkIstex><language><json:string>eng</json:string></language><originalGenre><json:string>article</json:string></originalGenre><abstract>Abstract: Introduction: In implants, maintenance assumes an important role. The role of chlorhexidine (CHX) is well known in maintenance, while only limited evidence exists on the practical use of hyaluronic acid (HA). The objective of this study was to compare the health status of the peri‐implant complex (hard and soft tissues surrounding the implant) during the healing period of immediate function implants, using HA or CHX gels in the patient's maintenance protocol.Study population and methodology: Thirty complete edentulous patients, with four immediate function Brånemark System implants placed in the mandible (total of 120 implants), were randomly assigned to two groups (HA and CHX) using only these two chemicals in their daily implant self‐care. Both groups were followed up for 6 months, with clinical observations on the 10th day, 2 months, 4 months and 6 months post‐surgically.Results: During the course of the study, HA and CHX produced good results in maintaining a healthy peri‐implant complex in immediate function implants for complete rehabilitations in the edentulous mandible. Statistically significant differences were found in favour of the HA group in the modified bleeding index on the second observation (P = 0.003). The difference was more marked in the axial implants placed in the fifth sextant (P = 0.05). Correlation coefficient between plaque and bleeding index revealed a potentially better result for CHX at 6 months.Conclusion: The findings point out the importance of a maintenance protocol in immediate function implants. Both chemicals are valid tools for implant maintenance. The authors suggest that it might be advantageous to administer HA in the first 2 months and CHX between 2 and 6 months.</abstract><qualityIndicators><score>9.107</score><pdfWordCount>4107</pdfWordCount><pdfCharCount>26836</pdfCharCount><pdfVersion>1.3</pdfVersion><pdfPageCount>8</pdfPageCount><pdfPageSize>595.276 x 782.362 pts</pdfPageSize><refBibsNative>true</refBibsNative><abstractWordCount>252</abstractWordCount><abstractCharCount>1743</abstractCharCount><keywordCount>9</keywordCount></qualityIndicators><title>Peri‐implant maintenance of immediate function implants: a pilot study comparing hyaluronic acid and chlorhexidine</title><pmid><json:string>17461960</json:string></pmid><genre><json:string>article</json:string></genre><host><title>International Journal of Dental Hygiene</title><language><json:string>unknown</json:string></language><doi><json:string>10.1111/(ISSN)1601-5037</json:string></doi><issn><json:string>1601-5029</json:string></issn><eissn><json:string>1601-5037</json:string></eissn><publisherId><json:string>IDH</json:string></publisherId><volume>5</volume><issue>2</issue><pages><first>87</first><last>94</last><total>8</total></pages><genre><json:string>journal</json:string></genre></host><namedEntities><unitex><date><json:string>2007</json:string><json:string>2004</json:string></date><geogName></geogName><orgName><json:string>Portugal Abstract</json:string><json:string>Lisbon Portugal Tel</json:string><json:string>Portugal, Methodology</json:string><json:string>Portugal Nuno Cintra, Private Practice, Department</json:string><json:string>Clinical Research, Cl</json:string><json:string>Ratiopharm</json:string></orgName><orgName_funder></orgName_funder><orgName_provider></orgName_provider><persName><json:string>Miguel de Araujo</json:string><json:string>Paulo Malo</json:string><json:string>Portugal</json:string></persName><placeName><json:string>Rochester</json:string><json:string>NY</json:string><json:string>USA</json:string><json:string>Gothenburg</json:string><json:string>Lisbon</json:string><json:string>Portugal</json:string><json:string>Italy</json:string><json:string>Sweden</json:string></placeName><ref_url></ref_url><ref_bibl><json:string>Nobre et al.</json:string></ref_bibl><bibl></bibl></unitex></namedEntities><ark><json:string>ark:/67375/WNG-7G7KJQKX-9</json:string></ark><categories><wos><json:string>1 - science</json:string><json:string>2 - dentistry, oral surgery & medicine</json:string></wos><scienceMetrix></scienceMetrix><scopus><json:string>1 - Health Sciences</json:string><json:string>2 - Dentistry</json:string><json:string>3 - Dentistry (miscellaneous)</json:string></scopus></categories><publicationDate>2007</publicationDate><copyrightDate>2007</copyrightDate><doi><json:string>10.1111/j.1601-5037.2007.00239.x</json:string></doi><id>C9D749CC50E692B020B183074C53AAF15BA6E5C4</id><score>1</score><fulltext><json:item><extension>pdf</extension><original>true</original><mimetype>application/pdf</mimetype><uri>https://api.istex.fr/document/C9D749CC50E692B020B183074C53AAF15BA6E5C4/fulltext/pdf</uri></json:item><json:item><extension>zip</extension><original>false</original><mimetype>application/zip</mimetype><uri>https://api.istex.fr/document/C9D749CC50E692B020B183074C53AAF15BA6E5C4/fulltext/zip</uri></json:item><istex:fulltextTEI uri="https://api.istex.fr/document/C9D749CC50E692B020B183074C53AAF15BA6E5C4/fulltext/tei"><teiHeader><fileDesc><titleStmt><title level="a" type="main">Peri‐implant maintenance of immediate function implants: a pilot study comparing hyaluronic acid and chlorhexidine</title></titleStmt><publicationStmt><authority>ISTEX</authority><publisher>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</publisher><pubPlace>Oxford, UK</pubPlace><date type="published" when="2007-05"></date></publicationStmt><notesStmt><note type="content-type" subtype="article" source="article" scheme="https://content-type.data.istex.fr/ark:/67375/XTP-6N5SZHKN-D">article</note><note type="publication-type" subtype="journal" scheme="https://publication-type.data.istex.fr/ark:/67375/JMC-0GLKJH51-B">journal</note></notesStmt><sourceDesc><biblStruct type="article"><analytic><title level="a" type="main">Peri‐implant maintenance of immediate function implants: a pilot study comparing hyaluronic acid and chlorhexidine</title><title level="a" type="short">Evaluation of an implant maintenance protocol</title><author xml:id="author-0000"><persName><forename type="first">M</forename><surname>De Araújo Nobre</surname></persName><affiliation>Miguel de Araújo Nobre, Private Practice, Department of Oral Hygiene, Department of Clinical Research, Clínica Maló, Lisbon, Portugal
Nuno Cintra, Private Practice, Department of Oral Surgery, Clínica Maló, Lisbon, Portugal
Paulo Maló, Private Practice, Department of Implantology and Prosthodontics, Clínica Maló, Lisbon, Portugal<address><country key="PT"></country></address></affiliation></author><author xml:id="author-0001"><persName><forename type="first">N</forename><surname>Cintra</surname></persName><affiliation>Miguel de Araújo Nobre, Private Practice, Department of Oral Hygiene, Department of Clinical Research, Clínica Maló, Lisbon, Portugal
Nuno Cintra, Private Practice, Department of Oral Surgery, Clínica Maló, Lisbon, Portugal
Paulo Maló, Private Practice, Department of Implantology and Prosthodontics, Clínica Maló, Lisbon, Portugal<address><country key="PT"></country></address></affiliation></author><author xml:id="author-0002"><persName><forename type="first">P</forename><surname>Maló</surname></persName><affiliation>Miguel de Araújo Nobre, Private Practice, Department of Oral Hygiene, Department of Clinical Research, Clínica Maló, Lisbon, Portugal
Nuno Cintra, Private Practice, Department of Oral Surgery, Clínica Maló, Lisbon, Portugal
Paulo Maló, Private Practice, Department of Implantology and Prosthodontics, Clínica Maló, Lisbon, Portugal<address><country key="PT"></country></address></affiliation></author><idno type="istex">C9D749CC50E692B020B183074C53AAF15BA6E5C4</idno><idno type="ark">ark:/67375/WNG-7G7KJQKX-9</idno><idno type="DOI">10.1111/j.1601-5037.2007.00239.x</idno><idno type="unit">IDH239</idno><idno type="toTypesetVersion">file:IDH.IDH239.pdf</idno></analytic><monogr><title level="j" type="main">International Journal of Dental Hygiene</title><title level="j" type="alt">INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF DENTAL HYGIENE</title><idno type="pISSN">1601-5029</idno><idno type="eISSN">1601-5037</idno><idno type="book-DOI">10.1111/(ISSN)1601-5037</idno><idno type="book-part-DOI">10.1111/idh.2007.5.issue-2</idno><idno type="product">IDH</idno><idno type="publisherDivision">ST</idno><imprint><biblScope unit="vol">5</biblScope><biblScope unit="issue">2</biblScope><biblScope unit="page" from="87">87</biblScope><biblScope unit="page" to="94">94</biblScope><biblScope unit="page-count">8</biblScope><publisher>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</publisher><pubPlace>Oxford, UK</pubPlace><date type="published" when="2007-05"></date></imprint></monogr></biblStruct></sourceDesc></fileDesc><profileDesc><abstract xml:lang="en" style="main"><p><hi rend="bold">Abstract: </hi>
<hi rend="italic">Introduction: </hi>In implants, maintenance assumes an important role. The role of chlorhexidine (CHX) is well known in maintenance, while only limited evidence exists on the practical use of hyaluronic acid (HA). The objective of this study was to compare the health status of the peri‐implant complex (hard and soft tissues surrounding the implant) during the healing period of immediate function implants, using HA or CHX gels in the patient's maintenance protocol.<hi rend="italic">Study population and methodology: </hi>Thirty complete edentulous patients, with four immediate function Brånemark System implants placed in the mandible (total of 120 implants), were randomly assigned to two groups (HA and CHX) using only these two chemicals in their daily implant self‐care. Both groups were followed up for 6 months, with clinical observations on the 10th day, 2 months, 4 months and 6 months post‐surgically.<hi rend="italic">Results: </hi>During the course of the study, HA and CHX produced good results in maintaining a healthy peri‐implant complex in immediate function implants for complete rehabilitations in the edentulous mandible. Statistically significant differences were found in favour of the HA group in the modified bleeding index on the second observation (<hi rend="italic">P</hi> = 0.003). The difference was more marked in the axial implants placed in the fifth sextant (<hi rend="italic">P</hi> = 0.05). Correlation coefficient between plaque and bleeding index revealed a potentially better result for CHX at 6 months.<hi rend="italic">Conclusion: </hi>The findings point out the importance of a maintenance protocol in immediate function implants. Both chemicals are valid tools for implant maintenance. The authors suggest that it might be advantageous to administer HA in the first 2 months and CHX between 2 and 6 months.</p></abstract><textClass><keywords xml:lang="en"><term xml:id="k1">axial implants</term><term xml:id="k2">chlorhexidine</term><term xml:id="k3">gel</term><term xml:id="k4">hyaluronic acid</term><term xml:id="k5">immediate function</term><term xml:id="k6">maintenance</term><term xml:id="k7">oral hygiene</term><term xml:id="k8">oral implants</term><term xml:id="k9">tilted implants</term></keywords><keywords rend="tocHeading1"><term>ORIGINAL ARTICLES</term></keywords></textClass><langUsage><language ident="en"></language></langUsage></profileDesc></teiHeader></istex:fulltextTEI><json:item><extension>txt</extension><original>false</original><mimetype>text/plain</mimetype><uri>https://api.istex.fr/document/C9D749CC50E692B020B183074C53AAF15BA6E5C4/fulltext/txt</uri></json:item></fulltext><metadata><istex:metadataXml wicri:clean="Wiley, elements deleted: body"><istex:xmlDeclaration>version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" standalone="yes"</istex:xmlDeclaration><istex:document><component version="2.0" type="serialArticle" xml:lang="en"><header><publicationMeta level="product"><publisherInfo><publisherName>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</publisherName><publisherLoc>Oxford, UK</publisherLoc></publisherInfo><doi origin="wiley" registered="yes">10.1111/(ISSN)1601-5037</doi><issn type="print">1601-5029</issn><issn type="electronic">1601-5037</issn><idGroup><id type="product" value="IDH"></id><id type="publisherDivision" value="ST"></id></idGroup><titleGroup><title type="main" sort="INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF DENTAL HYGIENE">International Journal of Dental Hygiene</title></titleGroup></publicationMeta><publicationMeta level="part" position="05002"><doi origin="wiley">10.1111/idh.2007.5.issue-2</doi><numberingGroup><numbering type="journalVolume" number="5">5</numbering><numbering type="journalIssue" number="2">2</numbering></numberingGroup><coverDate startDate="2007-05">May 2007</coverDate></publicationMeta><publicationMeta level="unit" type="article" position="6" status="forIssue"><doi origin="wiley">10.1111/j.1601-5037.2007.00239.x</doi><idGroup><id type="unit" value="IDH239"></id></idGroup><countGroup><count type="pageTotal" number="8"></count></countGroup><titleGroup><title type="tocHeading1">ORIGINAL ARTICLES</title></titleGroup><eventGroup><event type="firstOnline" date="2007-04-24"></event><event type="publishedOnlineFinalForm" date="2007-04-24"></event><event type="xmlConverted" agent="Converter:BPG_TO_WML3G version:2.3.5 mode:FullText source:FullText result:FullText" date="2010-04-08"></event><event type="xmlConverted" agent="Converter:WILEY_ML3G_TO_WILEY_ML3GV2 version:3.8.8" date="2014-01-27"></event><event type="xmlConverted" agent="Converter:WML3G_To_WML3G version:4.1.7 mode:FullText,remove_FC" date="2014-10-24"></event></eventGroup><numberingGroup><numbering type="pageFirst" number="87">87</numbering><numbering type="pageLast" number="94">94</numbering></numberingGroup><correspondenceTo><i>Miguel de Araújo Nobre</i>
Clínica Malo
Avenida Dos Combatentes
43, 9C, Edifício Green Park
1600‐042 Lisbon
Portugal
Tel.: +351 21 722 81 00
Fax: +351 21 726 69 65
E‐mail: <email>mignobre@gmail.com</email>; <email>mnobre@clinicamalo.pt</email></correspondenceTo><linkGroup><link type="toTypesetVersion" href="file:IDH.IDH239.pdf"></link></linkGroup></publicationMeta><contentMeta><unparsedEditorialHistory><b>Dates:</b> Accepted 15 February 2007</unparsedEditorialHistory><countGroup><count type="figureTotal" number="2"></count><count type="tableTotal" number="2"></count></countGroup><titleGroup><title type="main">Peri‐implant maintenance of immediate function implants: a pilot study comparing hyaluronic acid and chlorhexidine</title><title type="shortAuthors">de Araújo Nobre et al</title><title type="short">Evaluation of an implant maintenance protocol</title></titleGroup><creators><creator creatorRole="author" xml:id="cr1" affiliationRef="#aff-1-1"><personName><givenNames>M</givenNames><familyName>De Araújo Nobre</familyName></personName></creator><creator creatorRole="author" xml:id="cr2" affiliationRef="#aff-1-1"><personName><givenNames>N</givenNames><familyName>Cintra</familyName></personName></creator><creator creatorRole="author" xml:id="cr3" affiliationRef="#aff-1-1"><personName><givenNames>P</givenNames><familyName>Maló</familyName></personName></creator></creators><affiliationGroup><affiliation xml:id="aff-1-1" countryCode="PT"><unparsedAffiliation><i>Miguel de Araújo Nobre</i>, Private Practice, Department of Oral Hygiene, Department of Clinical Research, Clínica Maló, Lisbon, Portugal
<i>Nuno Cintra</i>, Private Practice, Department of Oral Surgery, Clínica Maló, Lisbon, Portugal
<i>Paulo Maló</i>, Private Practice, Department of Implantology and Prosthodontics, Clínica Maló, Lisbon, Portugal</unparsedAffiliation></affiliation></affiliationGroup><keywordGroup xml:lang="en"><keyword xml:id="k1">axial implants</keyword><keyword xml:id="k2">chlorhexidine</keyword><keyword xml:id="k3">gel</keyword><keyword xml:id="k4">hyaluronic acid</keyword><keyword xml:id="k5">immediate function</keyword><keyword xml:id="k6">maintenance</keyword><keyword xml:id="k7">oral hygiene</keyword><keyword xml:id="k8">oral implants</keyword><keyword xml:id="k9">tilted implants</keyword></keywordGroup><abstractGroup><abstract type="main" xml:lang="en"><p><b>Abstract: </b> <i>Introduction: </i>In implants, maintenance assumes an important role. The role of chlorhexidine (CHX) is well known in maintenance, while only limited evidence exists on the practical use of hyaluronic acid (HA). The objective of this study was to compare the health status of the peri‐implant complex (hard and soft tissues surrounding the implant) during the healing period of immediate function implants, using HA or CHX gels in the patient's maintenance protocol.<i>Study population and methodology: </i>Thirty complete edentulous patients, with four immediate function Brånemark System implants placed in the mandible (total of 120 implants), were randomly assigned to two groups (HA and CHX) using only these two chemicals in their daily implant self‐care. Both groups were followed up for 6 months, with clinical observations on the 10th day, 2 months, 4 months and 6 months post‐surgically.<i>Results: </i>During the course of the study, HA and CHX produced good results in maintaining a healthy peri‐implant complex in immediate function implants for complete rehabilitations in the edentulous mandible. Statistically significant differences were found in favour of the HA group in the modified bleeding index on the second observation (<i>P</i> = 0.003). The difference was more marked in the axial implants placed in the fifth sextant (<i>P</i> = 0.05). Correlation coefficient between plaque and bleeding index revealed a potentially better result for CHX at 6 months.<i>Conclusion: </i>The findings point out the importance of a maintenance protocol in immediate function implants. Both chemicals are valid tools for implant maintenance. The authors suggest that it might be advantageous to administer HA in the first 2 months and CHX between 2 and 6 months.</p></abstract></abstractGroup></contentMeta></header></component></istex:document></istex:metadataXml><mods version="3.6"><titleInfo lang="en"><title>Peri‐implant maintenance of immediate function implants: a pilot study comparing hyaluronic acid and chlorhexidine</title></titleInfo><titleInfo type="abbreviated" lang="en"><title>Evaluation of an implant maintenance protocol</title></titleInfo><titleInfo type="alternative" contentType="CDATA" lang="en"><title>Peri‐implant maintenance of immediate function implants: a pilot study comparing hyaluronic acid and chlorhexidine</title></titleInfo><name type="personal"><namePart type="given">M</namePart><namePart type="family">De Araújo Nobre</namePart><affiliation>Miguel de Araújo Nobre, Private Practice, Department of Oral Hygiene, Department of Clinical Research, Clínica Maló, Lisbon, PortugalNuno Cintra, Private Practice, Department of Oral Surgery, Clínica Maló, Lisbon, PortugalPaulo Maló, Private Practice, Department of Implantology and Prosthodontics, Clínica Maló, Lisbon, Portugal</affiliation><role><roleTerm type="text">author</roleTerm></role></name><name type="personal"><namePart type="given">N</namePart><namePart type="family">Cintra</namePart><affiliation>Miguel de Araújo Nobre, Private Practice, Department of Oral Hygiene, Department of Clinical Research, Clínica Maló, Lisbon, PortugalNuno Cintra, Private Practice, Department of Oral Surgery, Clínica Maló, Lisbon, PortugalPaulo Maló, Private Practice, Department of Implantology and Prosthodontics, Clínica Maló, Lisbon, Portugal</affiliation><role><roleTerm type="text">author</roleTerm></role></name><name type="personal"><namePart type="given">P</namePart><namePart type="family">Maló</namePart><affiliation>Miguel de Araújo Nobre, Private Practice, Department of Oral Hygiene, Department of Clinical Research, Clínica Maló, Lisbon, PortugalNuno Cintra, Private Practice, Department of Oral Surgery, Clínica Maló, Lisbon, PortugalPaulo Maló, Private Practice, Department of Implantology and Prosthodontics, Clínica Maló, Lisbon, Portugal</affiliation><role><roleTerm type="text">author</roleTerm></role></name><typeOfResource>text</typeOfResource><genre type="article" displayLabel="article" authority="ISTEX" authorityURI="https://content-type.data.istex.fr" valueURI="https://content-type.data.istex.fr/ark:/67375/XTP-6N5SZHKN-D">article</genre><originInfo><publisher>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</publisher><place><placeTerm type="text">Oxford, UK</placeTerm></place><dateIssued encoding="w3cdtf">2007-05</dateIssued><edition>Dates: Accepted 15 February 2007</edition><copyrightDate encoding="w3cdtf">2007</copyrightDate></originInfo><language><languageTerm type="code" authority="rfc3066">en</languageTerm><languageTerm type="code" authority="iso639-2b">eng</languageTerm></language><physicalDescription><extent unit="figures">2</extent><extent unit="tables">2</extent></physicalDescription><abstract>Abstract: Introduction: In implants, maintenance assumes an important role. The role of chlorhexidine (CHX) is well known in maintenance, while only limited evidence exists on the practical use of hyaluronic acid (HA). The objective of this study was to compare the health status of the peri‐implant complex (hard and soft tissues surrounding the implant) during the healing period of immediate function implants, using HA or CHX gels in the patient's maintenance protocol.Study population and methodology: Thirty complete edentulous patients, with four immediate function Brånemark System implants placed in the mandible (total of 120 implants), were randomly assigned to two groups (HA and CHX) using only these two chemicals in their daily implant self‐care. Both groups were followed up for 6 months, with clinical observations on the 10th day, 2 months, 4 months and 6 months post‐surgically.Results: During the course of the study, HA and CHX produced good results in maintaining a healthy peri‐implant complex in immediate function implants for complete rehabilitations in the edentulous mandible. Statistically significant differences were found in favour of the HA group in the modified bleeding index on the second observation (P = 0.003). The difference was more marked in the axial implants placed in the fifth sextant (P = 0.05). Correlation coefficient between plaque and bleeding index revealed a potentially better result for CHX at 6 months.Conclusion: The findings point out the importance of a maintenance protocol in immediate function implants. Both chemicals are valid tools for implant maintenance. The authors suggest that it might be advantageous to administer HA in the first 2 months and CHX between 2 and 6 months.</abstract><subject lang="en"><genre>keywords</genre><topic>axial implants</topic><topic>chlorhexidine</topic><topic>gel</topic><topic>hyaluronic acid</topic><topic>immediate function</topic><topic>maintenance</topic><topic>oral hygiene</topic><topic>oral implants</topic><topic>tilted implants</topic></subject><relatedItem type="host"><titleInfo><title>International Journal of Dental Hygiene</title></titleInfo><genre type="journal" authority="ISTEX" authorityURI="https://publication-type.data.istex.fr" valueURI="https://publication-type.data.istex.fr/ark:/67375/JMC-0GLKJH51-B">journal</genre><identifier type="ISSN">1601-5029</identifier><identifier type="eISSN">1601-5037</identifier><identifier type="DOI">10.1111/(ISSN)1601-5037</identifier><identifier type="PublisherID">IDH</identifier><part><date>2007</date><detail type="volume"><caption>vol.</caption><number>5</number></detail><detail type="issue"><caption>no.</caption><number>2</number></detail><extent unit="pages"><start>87</start><end>94</end><total>8</total></extent></part></relatedItem><identifier type="istex">C9D749CC50E692B020B183074C53AAF15BA6E5C4</identifier><identifier type="ark">ark:/67375/WNG-7G7KJQKX-9</identifier><identifier type="DOI">10.1111/j.1601-5037.2007.00239.x</identifier><identifier type="ArticleID">IDH239</identifier><recordInfo><recordContentSource authority="ISTEX" authorityURI="https://loaded-corpus.data.istex.fr" valueURI="https://loaded-corpus.data.istex.fr/ark:/67375/XBH-L0C46X92-X">wiley</recordContentSource><recordOrigin>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</recordOrigin></recordInfo></mods><json:item><extension>json</extension><original>false</original><mimetype>application/json</mimetype><uri>https://api.istex.fr/document/C9D749CC50E692B020B183074C53AAF15BA6E5C4/metadata/json</uri></json:item></metadata><serie></serie></istex></record>Pour manipuler ce document sous Unix (Dilib)
EXPLOR_STEP=$WICRI_ROOT/Wicri/Santé/explor/EdenteV2/Data/Istex/Corpus
HfdSelect -h $EXPLOR_STEP/biblio.hfd -nk 006436 | SxmlIndent | more
Ou
HfdSelect -h $EXPLOR_AREA/Data/Istex/Corpus/biblio.hfd -nk 006436 | SxmlIndent | more
Pour mettre un lien sur cette page dans le réseau Wicri
{{Explor lien
|wiki= Wicri/Santé
|area= EdenteV2
|flux= Istex
|étape= Corpus
|type= RBID
|clé= ISTEX:C9D749CC50E692B020B183074C53AAF15BA6E5C4
|texte= Peri‐implant maintenance of immediate function implants: a pilot study comparing hyaluronic acid and chlorhexidine
}}
| This area was generated with Dilib version V0.6.32. |  |